Skip to main content
The British Journal of Ophthalmology logoLink to The British Journal of Ophthalmology
. 1983 Mar;67(3):178–180. doi: 10.1136/bjo.67.3.178

Controlled study comparing CAM treatment with occlusion therapy.

K G Nyman, G Singh, A Rydberg, M Fornander
PMCID: PMC1040004  PMID: 6337623

Full text

PDF
178

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Campbell F. W., Hess R. F., Watson P. G., Banks R. Preliminary results of a physiologically based treatment of amblyopia. Br J Ophthalmol. 1978 Nov;62(11):748–755. doi: 10.1136/bjo.62.11.748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. HUBEL D. H., WIESEL T. N. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J Physiol. 1962 Jan;160:106–154. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Keith C. G., Howell E. R., Mitchell D. E., Smith S. Clinical trial of the use of rotating grating patterns in the treatment of amblyopia. Br J Ophthalmol. 1980 Aug;64(8):597–606. doi: 10.1136/bjo.64.8.597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Mackensen G., Kröner B., Postic G., Kelck W. Untersuchungen zum Problem der exzentrischen Fixation. Doc Ophthalmol. 1967;23:228–passim. doi: 10.1007/BF02550751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Tytla M. E., Labow-Daily L. S. Evaluation of the CAM treatment for amblyopia: a controlled study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1981 Mar;20(3):400–406. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Véronneau-Troutman S., Dayanoff S. S., Stohler T., Clahane A. C. Conventional occlusion vs. pleoptics in the treatment of amblyopia. Am J Ophthalmol. 1974 Jul;78(1):117–120. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(74)90019-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES