Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Res. 2022 Jul 11;214(Pt 1):113881. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.113881

Ambient air pollution during pregnancy and DNA methylation in umbilical cord blood, with potential mediation of associations with infant adiposity: The Healthy Start study

Anne P Starling a,b,*, Cheyret Wood c, Cuining Liu c, Katerina Kechris c, Ivana V Yang a,d,e, Chloe Friedman a,b, Deborah SK Thomas f, Jennifer L Peel g, John L Adgate h, Sheryl Magzamen g,i, Sheena E Martenies g,j, William B Allshouse h, Dana Dabelea a,b,k
PMCID: PMC10402394  NIHMSID: NIHMS1919953  PMID: 35835166

Abstract

Background:

Prenatal exposure to ambient air pollution has been associated with adverse offspring health outcomes. Childhood health effects of prenatal exposures may be mediated through changes to DNA methylation detectable at birth.

Methods:

Among 429 non-smoking women in a cohort study of mother-infant pairs in Colorado, USA, we estimated associations between prenatal exposure to ambient fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and ozone (O3), and epigenome-wide DNA methylation of umbilical cord blood cells at delivery (2010–2014). We calculated average PM2.5 and O3 in each trimester of pregnancy and the full pregnancy using inverse-distance-weighted interpolation. We fit linear regression models adjusted for potential confounders and cell proportions to estimate associations between air pollutants and methylation at each of 432,943 CpGs. Differentially methylated regions (DMRs) were identified using comb-p. Previously in this cohort, we reported positive associations between 3rd trimester O3 exposure and infant adiposity at 5 months of age. Here, we quantified the potential for mediation of that association by changes in DNA methylation in cord blood.

Results:

We identified several DMRs for each pollutant and period of pregnancy. The greatest number of significant DMRs were associated with third trimester PM2.5 (21 DMRs). No single CpGs were associated with air pollutants at a false discovery rate <0.05. We found that up to 8% of the effect of 3rd trimester O3 on 5-month adiposity may be mediated by locus-specific methylation changes, but mediation estimates were not statistically significant.

Conclusions:

Differentially methylated regions in cord blood were identified in association with maternal exposure to PM2.5 and O3. Genes annotated to the significant sites played roles in cardiometabolic disease, immune function and inflammation, and neurologic disorders. We found limited evidence of mediation by DNA methylation of associations between third trimester O3 exposure and 5-month infant adiposity.

Keywords: Air pollution, particulate matter, ozone, DNA methylation, epigenetics, cord blood

Introduction

Exposure to ambient air pollution during pregnancy has been linked to adverse offspring health outcomes, including greater risk of infant low birth weight and preterm birth (18). The strength of such associations may differ by the timing of exposure during gestation (915). Air pollution exposures in utero have also been associated with childhood health outcomes, including altered growth and body composition (1618) and increased blood pressure (19). Prenatal environmental exposures may have delayed or lasting effects on offspring phenotype by causing epigenetic modifications to offspring DNA at sensitive periods of development (20).

Short-term and long-term exposures to various air pollutants have been linked to differences in DNA methylation in peripheral blood of adults (2126) and children (27). Furthermore, epidemiologic studies of air pollution exposures during pregnancy have demonstrated epigenetic changes to the placenta, which may be particularly relevant for impacts on fetal growth (2836). However, relatively few studies have examined air pollution-associated changes to DNA methylation in umbilical cord blood cells collected at birth. DNA methylation differences in cord blood may reflect in utero programming of the child’s DNA by the intrauterine environment, with consequences for childhood health outcomes including body weight and excess adiposity (3740), asthma (41), and cognitive and psychiatric disorders (42, 43).

A limited number of previous studies have reported air pollution-associated epigenetic differences in cord blood. Some have analyzed global methylation (44, 45) or methylation at long interspersed nuclear elements (LINE-1) (4648), while others have examined methylation at target sites within selected genes (4954). Still fewer studies have examined epigenome-wide associations in cord blood with air pollution measures or proxies (29, 55, 56), including two meta-analyses of ambient nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and fine particulate matter (PM2.5), respectively, in several US and European cohorts (57, 58). However, previous studies have not examined trimester-specific exposures to identify potential sensitive windows, nor have they explored the potential for locus-specific differences in cord blood DNA methylation to mediate associations between prenatal air pollution exposure and offspring obesity-related outcomes. Previous studies focused on other exposures have identified differentially methylated positions in cord blood DNA that predict adiposity in infancy (38), early childhood (3740) and mid-childhood (37).

In our previous work in the Denver, Colorado-based Healthy Start cohort, we observed a positive association between maternal exposure to ozone (O3), but not PM2.5, in the 3rd trimester and greater offspring adiposity at 5 months of age, but no exposure-related differences in infant weight or adiposity at birth (59). Notably, the Colorado Front Range region including Denver has been classified as a “serious nonattainment area” by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency due to O3 levels routinely exceeding federal air quality standards (60). We hypothesized that prenatal air pollution exposures may produce delayed effects on offspring growth and body composition, potentially via changes to DNA methylation detectable in cord blood at delivery. In this study, we aimed to estimate associations between trimester-specific and full-pregnancy ambient PM2.5 and O3, and umbilical cord blood DNA methylation in the Healthy Start cohort. Additionally, we estimated the potential for mediation by cord blood methylation at selected CpGs of the previously observed association between prenatal exposure to O3 and infant adiposity at 5 months of age.

Methods

Study population and eligibility

Pregnant women at ≤24 weeks of gestation were recruited into the Healthy Start cohort study (2009–2014) from the University of Colorado Hospital clinics. Women were excluded from enrollment if they had multiple gestation, were younger than 16 years of age, had a history of stillbirth or preterm birth prior to 25 weeks of gestation, or were currently receiving treatment for any of the following conditions: diabetes, cancer, asthma, or psychiatric illness. Participants provided written informed consent. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board.

A total of 1,410 pregnant women enrolled in the Healthy Start cohort. For this study, eligible participants were identified among 600 women who previously had cord blood analyzed for DNA methylation markers as described below. Participants were not eligible for this analysis if their residential address was located outside of the Denver, Colorado metropolitan area or if we were unable to geographically locate the address (n=39). Additionally, we excluded women who reported sustained maternal smoking during pregnancy (n=51) or had missing data on smoking during pregnancy (n=77), leading to a potentially eligible sample size of 433 mother-infant pairs, with 4 subsequent exclusions for methylation quality control and some additional missing period-specific exposure data, as described below.

Prenatal ambient air pollution exposure assessment

We obtained and geocoded participant residential addresses at study enrollment. We obtained daily or hourly monitoring data for the entire study period (2009–2014) from the US EPA AQS Data Mart and the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. As previously described in detail (59), we calculated average daily values from each monitor for the first trimester, second trimester, third trimester, and across the full pregnancy (estimated conception to delivery date). We averaged hourly O3 values across each 8-hour interval to obtain the maximum daily 8-hour average for each 24-hour period. We applied the following weighting formula in averaging values from all monitors for a given residence: 1/distance-squared. All monitors with non-missing data within 50km of the participant’s address were included in the inverse-distance-weighted average (up to 10 monitors for PM2.5 and 19 for O3). For most periods of pregnancy, data from a median of 6 PM2.5 monitors and 11 O3 monitors was included in the weighted average (Supplemental Table S1).

Infant adiposity at 5 months of age

Infant body composition was evaluated at approximately 5 months of age using air displacement plethysmography (PEA POD, COSMED, Rome, Italy). Infants wore a dry diaper and a tight-fitting synthetic cap to cover the hair. The PEA POD uses measured body density to estimate fat mass and fat-free mass using an infant-specific algorithm. We defined adiposity as fat mass as a percentage of total body mass. Each infant was evaluated twice, and a third measurement was taken if adiposity estimates differed by >2%. The closest two measures were then averaged to obtain the infant adiposity variable used in this study.

Other variables

At study enrollment, participants reported their race, ethnicity, smoking history, and educational level attained via questionnaire. Participants repeatedly reported recent smoking behavior, twice during pregnancy and once shortly after delivery. Smoking was classified as “sustained” during pregnancy if women reported smoking at least 100 cigarettes during their lifetime in addition to any smoking after study enrollment; if women quit smoking early in pregnancy (prior to enrollment) then they were considered not sustained smokers and therefore eligible for this analysis. We obtained information on infant sex and gestational age at birth from medical records. Season of birth was based on the month of delivery and was classified as winter (December-February), spring (March-May), summer (June-August), or fall (September-November). We obtained hourly temperature data from up to 16 monitors within 50km of any participant residential address and calculated inverse-distance-weighted daily average temperature for each pregnancy period, using an approach parallel to that described above for the air pollutants.

Analysis of DNA Methylation in Cord Blood

We used the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 array to evaluate genome-wide DNA methylation in umbilical cord blood (61). Methods and quality control procedures for DNA extraction and bisulfite conversion are described in our previous publication (62). Briefly, the QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit (Qiagen) was used for extraction of DNA from stored buffy coats. Quality control checks excluded samples that did not meet the following criteria: 260/280 ratio >1.8 indicating DNA purity, DNA integrity score >7, and at least 500 ng of DNA available. We estimated the relative proportions of seven cell types in umbilical cord blood based on a combined cord blood reference dataset (63) using the R package FlowSorted.CordBloodCombined.450k (R version 3.6.2, R Foundation for Statistical Computing). After initial quality control procedures to exclude probes with high detection p-value or low bead count (62), we then excluded 11,335 probes located on the X or Y chromosome, and 39,983 cross-reactive or polymorphic probes using the rmSNPandCH function in the R package DMRcate (version 2.2.3), based on Chen et al. (64). We logit-transformed raw methylation (beta) values to M-values to meet modeling assumptions. We performed stratified quantile normalization with the preprocessQuantile function in minfi (65).

We removed extreme methylation outliers, defined as M-values more than three times the interquartile range above the 75th percentile or below the 25th percentile (66, 67). This resulted in missing values (0.1% of all M-values), which we replaced using single imputation with the R package impute, version 1.62.0 (68) to facilitate surrogate variable analysis, described below. We excluded 4 participants for whom the reported sex of the infant did not match the predicted sex based on methylation data (n=4).

Statistical Analysis

We employed univariate analyses and visualizations to check for missing or implausible values of predictor variables. We used separate linear regression models to estimate associations between continuous PM2.5 or O3 averaged across trimester 1, trimester 2, trimester 3, or the full pregnancy, and methylation (M-values) at each of 432,943 CpG sites remaining after filtering. We addressed potential confounding by technical batch by adjusting for one batch variable and for 5 surrogate variables generated with the R package sva, version 3.36.0 (69). We constructed a directed acyclic graph based on previous literature (Supplemental Figure S1), and all models were additionally adjusted for the following potential confounders: maternal education (2 categories: completed high school or less, more than high school education), maternal race/ethnicity (3 categories: non-Hispanic white, Hispanic, and all others), season of birth (4 categories: winter, spring, summer, fall), and average temperature during the pregnancy period of interest. Models were additionally adjusted for the following precision variables: infant sex, gestational age at birth (days), and estimated proportions of seven cell types (CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, B cells, granulocytes, monocytes, NK cells, nucleated red blood cells). Because cell type proportions were not associated with air pollution exposures (Supplemental Table S2) and therefore not traditional confounders, we also examined results from models without cell type adjustment. We adjusted p-values for multiple testing using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure (70) to control the false discovery rate (FDR). We performed gene set analysis using the methylglm function from the R package methylgsa (71) to identify enrichment of pathways from the Gene Ontology (GO) and Reactome databases.

We additionally compared our PM2.5 results to the findings of a previously published meta-analysis of full-pregnancy PM2.5 exposure and epigenome-wide methylation in umbilical cord blood (57). For each of the 11 CpGs significantly associated with PM2.5 in the previous study and not excluded from our analysis, we examined whether the association between PM2.5 in each pregnancy period and cord blood DNA methylation at that CpG was nominally significant (p<0.05) in our results.

Differentially methylated regions (DMRs) were identified using comb-p (72), using as seeds the CpGs with raw p-values <0.1 from analysis of differentially methylated positions (DMPs). We merged peaks within 750 bps into a single DMR. We excluded DMRs containing fewer than 3 probes. We defined significance for DMRs as Šidák-adjusted p-value <0.05. We calculated the proportion of CpGs in each region with methylation positively associated with the exposure, and we confirmed that >80% of probes in each region had a consistent direction. We annotated DMRs via chromosome and location to associated genes using BioMART (73). We searched the NCBI Gene database to identify functions of genes annotated to each significant DMR, with a specific focus on health outcomes previously linked to air pollution exposure: adiposity, cardiometabolic disease, inflammation and neurologic function.

In a previous analysis in the same cohort using the same exposure data, we observed a positive association between 3rd trimester O3 concentrations (but not PM2.5) and infant adiposity at 5 months of age (59). Here, we explored the potential for epigenetic markers to mediate the previously observed association, among the subset of participants with complete data on both cord blood DNA methylation and 5-month adiposity. We evaluated as potential mediators the top CpG (by p-value) from each of the 9 significant DMRs associated with 3rd trimester O3 concentrations. We first confirmed that 3rd trimester O3 remained associated with 5-month adiposity in the subset of participants with complete adiposity data, and using the same covariate set employed in the epigenome-wide analysis but excluding surrogate variable adjustment. We then included two additional variables as precision covariates for the outcome of 5-month adiposity: infant age at the time of body composition measurement, and maternal pre-pregnancy BMI.

For those CpGs with consistent direction of association with both the exposure (third trimester O3) and the outcome (5-month adiposity), we estimated the proportion of the total effect mediated through changes in DNA methylation, using the model-based tools for causal mediation analysis as implemented in the R package mediation (74). The mediate function calculates the average causal mediation effect, or indirect effect, using a potential outcomes framework. Specifically, the indirect effect is the expected difference in the outcome when treatment (exposure) is held constant but the mediator is changed from its expected value in the absence of exposure, to its expected value in the presence of exposure. The total effect of third trimester O3 on 5-month adiposity was decomposed into a direct effect and an average causal mediation effect, or indirect effect, by separately fitting a mediator model and an outcome model.

We constructed a separate directed acyclic graph to represent the hypothesized associations between the exposure, mediator, outcome, and potential confounders of the exposure-outcome association, exposure-mediator association, and mediator-outcome association (Supplemental Figure S2). The mediator model regressed methylation (M-value) at each CpG on average 3rd trimester O3, adjusted for maternal education, race/ethnicity, pre-pregnancy BMI, infant sex, gestational age at birth, season of birth, average temperature during the 3rd trimester of pregnancy, age at infant adiposity measurement, one technical batch variable and seven estimated cell proportions. The outcome model regressed infant adiposity on 3rd trimester O3 adjusted for all of the covariates in the mediator model, and additionally adjusted for the M-value at the CpG (the hypothesized mediator). We tested for exposure-mediator interaction using the test.TMint function within the mediation R package.

Results

Following exclusions, there were 429 mother-infant pairs included in this analysis. Characteristics of these 429, and of the subset of 294 with complete data on infant adiposity at 5 months of age, are presented in Table 1. The participants included in this analysis were generally representative of the larger Healthy Start cohort (Supplemental Table S3), with the notable exception that we excluded women who reported sustained smoking during pregnancy from this analysis.

Table 1.

Characteristics of 429 eligible mother-infant pairs in epigenome-wide analysis, and a subset of 294 with infant adiposity assessed at 5 months of age.

Mean ± SD or N (%)
Main analysis (n=429) With 5-month infant adiposity data (n=294)
Infant sex
 Male 224 (52) 149 (51)
 Female 205 (48) 145 (49)
Race/ethnicity
 Non-Hispanic white 218 (51) 156 (53)
 Hispanic 115 (27) 77 (26)
 Non-Hispanic Black 69 (16) 45 (15)
 All other race/ethnicity groups 27 (6) 16 (5)
Birth weight (g) 3279 ± 431 3267 ± 445
Gestational age at birth (days) 276 ± 9 276 ± 9
Season of birth
 Winter 98 (23) 71 (24)
 Spring 103 (24) 71 (24)
 Summer 132 (31) 77 (26)
 Fall 96 (22) 75 (26)
Maternal educational level attained
 More than high school 289 (67) 210 (71)
 High school or less 140 (33) 84 (29)
Maternal age at delivery (years) 27 ± 6 28 ± 6
Maternal BMI prior to pregnancy (kg/m2) 26 ± 7 26 ± 7
Infant age (days) at follow-up -- 152 ± 35
Infant adiposity (%) at follow-up -- 25 ± 6
Mean PM2.5 in trimester 1 (μg/m3)a, b 7.6 ± 1.0 7.5 ± 0.9
Mean PM2.5 in trimester 2 (μg/m3)a, b 7.5 ± 1.0 7.4 ± 1.0
Mean PM2.5 in trimester 3 (μg/m3)a, b 7.5 ± 1.1 7.6 ± 1.1
Mean PM2.5 across full pregnancy (μg/m3) 7.5 ± 0.6 7.5 ± 0.5
Mean O3 in trimester 1 (ppb) 43 ± 11 44 ± 11
Mean O3 in trimester 2 (ppb) 43 ± 10 43 ± 10
Mean O3 in trimester 3 (ppb) 45 ± 11 44 ± 11
Mean O3 across full pregnancy (ppb) 44 ± 4 44 ± 4
a

Missing data by variable among the 429 participants in the main analysis: PM2.5 in trimester 1, 40; Mean PM2.5 in trimester 2, 29; PM2.5 in trimester 3, 8.

b

Missing data by variable among the 294 participants in the main analysis: PM2.5 in trimester 1, 30; Mean PM2.5 in trimester 2, 17; PM2.5 in trimester 3, 6.

Average concentrations of PM2.5 during the pregnancy periods were relatively low in the study area compared to many other urban areas in the US, with a median 24-hour average concentration of 7.5 μg/m3 (standard deviation 0.6 μg/m3) across the full pregnancy (Table 1). Average daily 8-hour maximum concentrations of O3 had a mean ± standard deviation of 44 ± 4 ppb across the full pregnancy. Due to strong seasonal trends in air pollution, exposures tended to be negatively correlated between trimesters and PM2.5 and O3 measures were negatively correlated with each other within the same trimester, as expected (Supplemental Table S4).

Epigenome-wide analyses showed no notable evidence of genomic inflation, with all lambda values between 0.968 and 1.015 (Supplemental Table S5). Models without cell type adjustment had a slightly wider range of lambda values (0.951–1.057). In fully adjusted models, there were no differentially methylated positions associated with PM2.5 or O3 at a false discovery rate (FDR) of <0.05. All CpGs with p<0.05 for each pollutant and period are presented in Supplemental Tables S6S13. Although we present the cell type-adjusted estimates as the primary results, we also provide results from models without cell type adjustment (Supplemental Tables S14S21). Manhattan and volcano plots for all models are provided (Supplemental Figures S3S34). Enrichment analyses identified only one significant pathway; the GO pathway for “organelle fusion” (GO:0048284) was associated with full pregnancy O3.

We identified several differentially methylated regions (DMRs) with FDR<0.05 for each pollutant and period of pregnancy exposure. For PM2.5 exposure, there were 13 DMRs for trimester 1, 5 for trimester 2, 21 for trimester 3, and 4 for full pregnancy average PM2.5 (Table 2). Genes annotated to these regions included some with previously reported associations with cardiometabolic disease (PON1 (75), NKAPL (76), KLB (77), HOOK2 (78), TYW3 (79)) and others associated with neurologic disorders (SLC6A3 (80), LOXHD1 (81), DLGAP2 (82, 83)), immunologic functions (CD6 (84), POU2AF1 (85)), and certain cancers (MGMT (86) ZFP57 (87), PAX8 (88)). While some genes were associated with both full pregnancy PM2.5 exposure and one other period, no genes were associated with more than one trimester of PM2.5 exposure. Differentially methylated regions for PM2.5 from models without cell type adjustment are presented in Supplemental Tables S22S25.

Table 2.

Differentially methylated regions (false discovery rate [FDR] <0.05) in cord blood associated with exposure to PM2.5 during pregnancy among 429 eligible mother-infant pairs in the Healthy Start study (2010–2014).

Chromosome Start position End position Raw p-value Šidák-adjusted p-value Annotated Gene(s) Top CpG (lowest p-value) from region Number of probes in region Proportion of probes with positive association Pregnancy period
18 44236847 44237852 1.41E-14 2.78E-10 LOXHD1 cg05264816 11 0 Trimester 1
7 94953653 94954253 2.85E-14 9.41E-10 PON1 cg04155289 9 1 Trimester 1
6 33282624 33283344 5.34E-11 1.47E-06 ZBTB22 cg04415168 25 0.11 Trimester 1
1 159825552 159825812 2.27E-11 1.73E-06 VSIG8 cg12217625 4 0 Trimester 1
2 72079276 72079660 3.17E-10 1.63E-05 DYSF cg09467436 6 0 Trimester 1
15 89959984 89960794 3.40E-09 8.29E-05 LOC105371031 cg17326095 7 0 Trimester 1
17 48911983 48912815 2.36E-08 0.00056 WFIKKN2 cg14074284 11 0 Trimester 1
6 29404667 29404784 9.94E-09 0.00168 OR10C1 cg03554196 4 0 Trimester 1
4 46126066 46126424 5.64E-08 0.003109 GABRG1 cg22324939 6 0 Trimester 1
5 1394296 1394684 6.65E-08 0.003384 SLC6A3 cg26924408 5 0 Trimester 1
6 28226885 28227271 7.86E-08 0.004019 NKAPL; ZKSCAN4 cg09523275 9 0 Trimester 1
13 112860420 112860558 1.55E-07 0.02198 LINC01070 cg04038089 3 0 Trimester 1
3 23244051 23244176 1.87E-07 0.0292 UBE2E2-AS1 cg18257541 4 0 Trimester 1
2 113992762 113993364 1.85E-11 6.09E-07 PAX8; PAX8-AS1 cg07594247 8 0 Trimester 2
17 43222106 43222309 4.37E-09 0.0004253 ACBD4 cg00625783 4 0 Trimester 2
11 111250093 111250482 1.48E-08 0.0007502 POU2AF1 cg11362935 9 0 Trimester 2
16 1583810 1584169 1.73E-08 0.0009529 IFT140; TMEM204 cg00463982 6 1 Trimester 2
14 81421983 81422211 4.48E-08 0.003882 TSHR cg19563130 5 0 Trimester 2
6 32063394 32065094 1.08E-17 1.25E-13 TNXB cg01033871 55 1 Trimester 3
11 60775545 60776175 1.83E-12 5.75E-08 CD6 cg10981907 4 0 Trimester 3
16 85362963 85363260 6.60E-12 4.39E-07 MIR5093 cg08428188 4 0 Trimester 3
4 39448432 39449181 1.85E-11 4.88E-07 KLB cg06235390 6 0 Trimester 3
6 31650735 31651413 4.45E-10 1.30E-05 LY6G5C cg25417675 21 0 Trimester 3
6 29648161 29648952 1.62E-09 4.05E-05 ZFP57 cg08022281 20 0 Trimester 3
1 75198403 75199168 2.22E-09 5.73E-05 TYW3; CRYZ cg26855724 10 1 Trimester 3
12 54070378 54070661 3.10E-09 0.0002166 ATP5MC2 cg22997177 6 0.17 Trimester 3
10 131193104 131193323 3.92E-09 0.0003536 MGMT cg13420320 3 1 Trimester 3
22 50482925 50483596 3.31E-08 0.0009761 TTLL8 cg02879960 5 0 Trimester 3
16 57831745 57832360 3.07E-08 0.0009879 KIFC3 cg27312338 6 0 Trimester 3
2 468737 469265 2.67E-08 0.0009977 LINC01874 cg22490454 5 1 Trimester 3
7 155584080 155584470 3.48E-08 0.001765 SHH cg09322003 4 1 Trimester 3
4 77723057 77723466 4.65E-08 0.002245 SHROOM3 cg14095959 4 0 Trimester 3
11 2890319 2890776 7.63E-08 0.003297 KCNQ1DN cg13081704 23 1 Trimester 3
16 88590325 88590518 3.52E-08 0.003604 LOC100128882; ZFPM1 cg06913337 5 0 Trimester 3
19 12876846 12877239 9.30E-08 0.004668 HOOK2 cg23899408 4 1 Trimester 3
8 637909 638381 1.65E-07 0.006871 ERICH1 cg12641240 3 0 Trimester 3
5 50673033 50673859 4.68E-07 0.01115 LOC642366 cg10536898 5 0 Trimester 3
1 201979478 201979815 8.41E-07 0.04816 ELF3; ELF3-AS1 cg18966401 5 0 Trimester 3
8 1094575 1094955 9.75E-07 0.04948 DLGAP2 cg03636930 4 0 Trimester 3
11 89867385 89868027 2.78E-12 8.57E-08 NAALAD2 cg05500015 10 0 Full
15 89959984 89960794 4.16E-11 1.02E-06 LOC105371031 cg06059461 7 0 Full
6 29404667 29404784 1.27E-07 0.02116 OR10C1 cg03554196 4 0 Full
6 29648345 29648952 1.15E-06 0.03669 ZFP57 cg08041448 16 0 Full

In one previous meta-analysis of prenatal exposure to PM2.5 and epigenome-wide cord blood DNA methylation (57), 14 CpGs were identified as differentially methylated. Of these, 11 were included in our analysis and we examined the coefficients and p-values for each of these CpGs in association with PM2.5 in different periods of pregnancy. Three of the 11 CpGs were nominally associated (p<0.05) with PM2.5 exposure in our data: one was associated with PM2.5 exposure during trimester 2 only (cg05479174) and the other two (cg24709511, cg16811875) were associated with PM2.5 exposure throughout the full pregnancy (Table 3). However, in each of these cases, the direction of association in our study was opposite to that reported in the previous meta-analysis.

Table 3.

Associationsa with PM2.5 by pregnancy period for CpGs reported as significant in previous meta-analysis by Gruzieva et al.b

Trimester 1 (n=389) Trimester 2 (n=400) Trimester 3 (n=421) Full pregnancy (n=429)
CpG Coefficient from Gruzieva et al. (2019) Coefficient p-value Coefficient p-value Coefficient p-value Coefficient p-value
cg24709511 −0.001 0.0142 0.17 0.0171 0.07 0.0083 0.31 0.0349 0.02
cg02236896 −0.003 0.0012 0.92 −0.0100 0.37 0.0051 0.61 −0.0028 0.87
cg16253537 0.001 0.0038 0.89 −0.0188 0.44 0.0089 0.68 0.0160 0.68
cg06846669 −0.002 0.0149 0.34 −0.0110 0.42 −0.0134 0.27 −0.0171 0.43
cg16811875 −0.003 0.0109 0.39 0.0221 0.05 0.0191 0.06 0.0358 0.04
cg22038738 −0.004 −0.0036 0.91 0.0089 0.76 −0.0129 0.61 0.0024 0.96
cg12044654 −0.001 −0.0100 0.19 0.0030 0.64 0.0003 0.96 −0.0064 0.54
cg05479174 −0.001 −0.0067 0.60 0.0275 0.01 0.0016 0.87 0.0253 0.15
cg19120073 −0.001 −0.0045 0.62 −0.0045 0.58 −0.0018 0.80 −0.0055 0.66
cg11886880 −0.001 0.0305 0.20 0.0214 0.33 0.0131 0.49 0.0522 0.12
cg23270359 −0.001 −0.0137 0.40 −0.0106 0.45 −0.0036 0.78 −0.0232 0.29
a

Coefficients from linear regression models, adjusted for average temperature during the exposure period of interest, infant sex, maternal education, maternal race/ethnicity, season of birth, infant gestational age at birth, technical batch, estimated proportions of seven cell types (B cells, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, granulocytes, monocytes, NK cells, and nucleated red blood cells), and five surrogate variables.

b

Gruzieva et al. (2019) Environmental Health Perspectives 127(5):057012.

For O3 exposure, there were 12 DMRs associated with trimester 1 exposure, 12 associated with trimester 2, 9 associated with trimester 3, and 8 regions associated with full-pregnancy exposure (Table 4). Genes annotated to O3-associated DMRs included some previously linked to lipid metabolism and atherosclerosis (ALOX12 (89), PON3 (90)), inflammation and immune response (MACROD1 (91), NCR1, RNF39, RAET1L), as well as neurologic disease (MCCC1 (92), DLGAP2 (82)) and one previously linked to preterm birth (VTRNA2-1 (93)). Some genes were linked to more than one trimester of exposure for O3 (FBXO27, RUFY1). Differentially methylated regions for O3 from models without cell type adjustment are presented in Supplemental Tables S26S29. There were two genes in common between the PM2.5-associated DMRs and the O3-associated DMRs: DLGAP2, which plays a role in neuronal cell signaling and has been linked to cognitive decline (82) and schizophrenia (83), and OR10C1, which codes for an olfactory receptor protein.

Table 4.

Differentially methylated regions (false discovery rate [FDR] <0.05) in cord blood associated with exposure to O3 during pregnancy among 429 eligible mother-infant pairs in the Healthy Start study (2010–2014).

Chromosome Start position End position Raw p-value Šidák-adjusted p-value Annotated Gene(s) Top CpG (lowest p-value) from region Number of probes in region Proportion of probes with positive association Pregnancy period
5 178986131 178986957 3.16E-11 7.57E-07 RUFY1 cg00080972 9 0 Trimester 1
17 6899085 6899628 1.63E-10 5.94E-06 ALOX12-AS1; ALOX12 cg03407747 11 1 Trimester 1
6 30038859 30039651 5.28E-10 1.32E-05 RNF39 cg03293507 35 0.03 Trimester 1
6 29404667 29404784 1.33E-10 2.24E-05 OR10C1 cg02270518 4 1 Trimester 1
16 2848409 2848881 1.32E-09 5.53E-05 PRSS41 cg27561907 4 1 Trimester 1
11 368351 368763 4.61E-09 0.0002213 B4GALNT4 cg15971656 12 1 Trimester 1
4 1523074 1523377 1.11E-08 0.0007214 FAM53A cg04300684 3 1 Trimester 1
2 241075915 241076652 3.01E-08 0.0008075 COPS9 cg22062537 21 0.90 Trimester 1
8 119086580 119086813 1.44E-08 0.001225 EXT1 cg20547777 3 0 Trimester 1
19 39523158 39523677 5.84E-08 0.002224 FBXO27 cg02197293 5 0 Trimester 1
11 1036677 1036989 6.30E-08 0.003984 MUC6 cg22685816 7 1 Trimester 1
7 95025829 95026299 4.78E-07 0.01993 PON3 cg04080282 17 0 Trimester 1
8 143859669 143860041 1.77E-11 9.42E-07 LYNX1-SLURP2; LYNX1 cg08090164 7 0 Trimester 2
5 178986131 178986957 1.34E-09 3.21E-05 RUFY1 cg22764044 9 0 Trimester 2
1 2885085 2885295 9.66E-09 0.0009094 ACTRT2 cg27537199 4 0 Trimester 2
19 55417361 55417698 2.38E-08 0.001396 NCR1 cg12952132 6 1 Trimester 2
1 1003126 1003580 6.82E-08 0.002966 LOC105378948 cg08709360 4 0 Trimester 2
19 39523158 39523487 2.45E-07 0.01464 FBXO27 cg08404221 4 0 Trimester 2
6 150346721 150347104 3.13E-07 0.01602 RAET1L cg20226154 10 0 Trimester 2
11 34460107 34460608 4.22E-07 0.0165 CAT cg01847719 10 0 Trimester 2
5 135416331 135416664 4.01E-07 0.02353 VTRNA2–1 cg18797653 9 0 Trimester 2
13 113540400 113540682 4.38E-07 0.03025 ATP11A cg11520003 5 0 Trimester 2
11 63775071 63775487 8.37E-07 0.03903 MACROD1 cg14085017 4 0 Trimester 2
10 48416781 48417028 5.82E-07 0.04555 GDF2 cg06840491 7 1 Trimester 2
3 182817190 182817677 3.99E-23 1.62E-18 MCCC1 cg03344955 11 0 Trimester 3
5 102898223 102898784 6.32E-13 2.23E-08 NUDT12 cg02976617 6 0 Trimester 3
8 689326 690110 1.81E-09 4.56E-05 LOC401442; DLGAP2 cg05022059 5 0 Trimester 3
5 178986131 178986957 3.80E-09 9.10E-05 RUFY1 cg19626725 9 0 Trimester 3
1 1003126 1003580 2.74E-08 0.001192 LOC105378948 cg08709360 4 0 Trimester 3
5 177366867 177367064 1.92E-08 0.001921 LOC100128340 cg07372500 2 0 Trimester 3
20 47013687 47013892 8.77E-08 0.008422 LINC00494 cg25181043 3 0 Trimester 3
8 23162162 23162434 1.75E-07 0.01262 LOXL2 cg07396746 3 0 Trimester 3
13 36871754 36872217 1.13E-06 0.04724 CCDC169; CCDC169-SOHLH2 cg11678027 11 0.09 Trimester 3
5 178986131 178986957 3.24E-13 7.76E-09 RUFY1 cg00080972 9 0 Full pregnancy
17 6899085 6899628 1.03E-09 3.74E-05 ALOX12-AS1; ALOX12 cg03407747 11 1 Full pregnancy
19 39523158 39523677 1.79E-08 0.00068 FBXO27 cg02197293 5 0 Full pregnancy
6 29404667 29404784 7.62E-09 0.001287 OR10C1 cg02270518 4 1 Full pregnancy
2 241076131 241076652 6.92E-08 0.002623 COPS9 cg20221591 15 1 Full pregnancy
4 1523074 1523377 1.22E-07 0.007932 FAM53A cg04300684 3 1 Full pregnancy
1 2885085 2885295 2.11E-07 0.0197 ACTRT2 cg11737757 4 0 Full pregnancy
8 143859734 143860041 6.56E-07 0.04139 LYNX1-SLURP2; LYNX1 cg10555383 5 0 Full pregnancy

Mediation by DNA methylation of associations between O3 and 5-month infant adiposity

Of the nine DMRs associated with 3rd trimester O3, the top CpGs (by p-value) from six of these DMRs were identified as potential candidates for mediation analysis, based on a consistent direction of association with both the exposure (3rd trimester O3) and the outcome (5-month adiposity). The estimated percentage of the total effect mediated by changes in methylation ranged from approximately 0 to 8%, although confidence intervals were wide and all included the null (Table 5).

Table 5.

Mediation analysisa for the top CpGs from DMRs significantly associated with 3rd trimester O3, and with consistent direction of association with the outcome of adiposity at 5 months of age among 294 infants.

CpG Annotated gene(s) Direction of association with 3rd trimester O3 Direction of association with 5-month adiposity Indirect effect (95% CI)b Direct effect (95% CI)b Proportion mediated (95% CI)b
cg03344955 MCCC1 negative negative 19.95 (−43.94, 89.47) 197.32 (−28.09, 421.17) 0.08 (−0.46, 0.89)
cg19626725 RUFY1 negative negative −4.2 (−47.76, 37.70) 223.38 (4.50, 437.28) −0.01 (−0.43, 0.35)
cg07372500 LOC100128340 negative negative −1.90 (−48.47, 45.10) 221.39 (−0.61, 438.99) −0.01 (−0.45, 0.38)
cg25181043 LINC00494 negative negative 6.31 (−34.21, 49.29) 210.86 (−10.89, 427.14) 0.02 (−0.33, 0.45)
cg07396746 LOXL2 negative negative 8.31 (−11.90, 40.50) 210.72 (−3.35, 427.21) 0.02 (−0.10, 0.32)
cg11678027 CCDC169; CCDC169-SOHLH2 negative negative 4.43 (−22.90, 36.45) 214.81 (1.35, 428.05) 0.01 (−0.21, 0.31)
a

Conducted using the R package mediation, as described in Tingley et al. (2014).

b

Estimate and 95% quasi-Bayesian confidence interval, from models adjusted for average temperature during the exposure period of interest, infant sex, maternal education, maternal race/ethnicity, season of birth, infant gestational age at birth, technical batch, and estimated proportions of seven cell types (B cells, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, granulocytes, monocytes, NK cells, and nucleated red blood cells).

Discussion

In a population of non-smoking women from a Colorado-based cohort study, we conducted an epigenome-wide analysis of associations between pregnancy-average and trimester-specific ambient concentrations of O3 and PM2.5, and DNA methylation in umbilical cord blood. We did not identify any single differentially methylated CpGs with epigenome-wide significance; however, we did identify several differentially methylated regions. Many of these regions were annotated to genes with roles in disease processes previously linked to air pollution exposure, including cardiometabolic disease, inflammation and immune function, and neurologic disorders.

The greatest number of DMRs in cord blood were associated with maternal exposure to PM2.5 in the third trimester of pregnancy. Genes annotated to PM2.5-associated regions included the following with previously reported cardiometabolic activities: PON1, involved in metabolism of oxidized lipids (94) and implicated in coronary artery disease (75);; KLB, associated with obesity and fatty liver disease (77); HOOK2, previously linked to type 2 diabetes (78); and TYW3, linked to circulating resistin levels (79). Other notable genes include SLC6A3 (also called DAT1), a dopamine transporter implicated in several neuropsychiatric disorders including schizophrenia (95), Parkinson’s disease (96) and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (97); DLGAP2, associated with cognitive decline (82) and schizophrenia (83); and CD6, linked to multiple sclerosis (98).

Our results were not consistent with those of a previous meta-analysis that examined associations between full-pregnancy PM2.5 and epigenome-wide DNA methylation in umbilical cord blood (57). The Healthy Start cohort data was not included in the previous meta-analysis. Of the 11 differentially methylated CpGs reported in that study and also analyzed here, two had nominal significance (p<0.05). However, in all of these cases, the direction of association was opposite to that reported previously. Possible reasons why our results differ from that of the meta-analysis, which included 1,551 mother-infant pairs from nine cohorts in the USA and Europe, may include: geographic differences in composition of PM2.5; additional confounder adjustment in our study including maternal education, season, and temperature; and heterogeneity between the populations in other unmeasured characteristics. Our analysis excluded women with sustained smoking during pregnancy, while women who smoked were included in the meta-analysis. The smaller sample size of our study may have also limited our ability to detect small effect sizes, although we evaluated replication using a generous threshold of p<0.05 without adjustment for multiple testing.

Compared to the PM2.5 results, there were fewer genes with reported cardiometabolic functions annotated to O3-associated DMRs; notable exceptions were PON3, involved in oxidation of LDL cholesterol and linked to coronary artery disease (90), and ALOX12, involved in lipid metabolism and platelet function and previously identified as an epigenetic marker of atherosclerosis (89). DMRs associated with O3 were annotated to some genes involved in inflammatory and immune functions including MACROD1, reported to enhance inflammation in adipocytes (91), and RNF39, at which methylation has been previously linked to multiple sclerosis (99). Some O3-associated DMRs were annotated to genes linked to neurologic disorders, including MCCC1, associated with susceptibility to Parkinson’s disease (92), and DLGAP2, involved in neuronal signaling and linked with cognitive decline (82). There were also suggestive associations with respiratory diseases among the genes annotated to ozone-associated DMRs. A previous study reported that methylation of nasal epithelial cells at a CpG in ATP11A, associated with 2nd trimester O3 in our study, predicted lung function and BMI in cystic fibrosis patients (100). The LYNX1 gene, also associated with 2nd trimester O3 exposure, is involved in regulation of nicotinic cholinergic signaling in the lung and has been proposed as a target for treatment of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (101).

Our epigenome-wide results share some common findings with previous studies. One previous study including 175 cord blood samples from the Early Autism Risk Longitudinal Investigation (EARLI) study identified differentially methylated regions (DMRs) in cord blood cells associated with prenatal O3 and NO2 exposures (29). Of note, one of the four DMRs associated with prenatal O3 in that study was located at the RNF39 gene and this gene was also annotated to one of the DMRs associated with first trimester O3 exposure in our study. RNF39 is located in the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) I region and methylation at this locus has been previously linked with immunological outcomes including multiple sclerosis (99) and cutaneous manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus (102).

We additionally examined the potential for differentially methylated CpGs in cord blood to act as mediators of the effect of prenatal air pollution exposure on infant and child health. In a previous publication using data from the Healthy Start cohort, we reported a positive association between 3rd trimester average 8-hour maximum O3 concentrations, and infant adiposity at a 5-month follow-up visit (59). There was no association in our previous study between average PM2.5 concentrations during pregnancy and infant adiposity. We therefore examined the potential for top CpGs from differentially methylated regions identified in this study to mediate the effect of prenatal O3 on 5-month infant adiposity. The top CpGs from six DMRs were identified as potential candidate mediators, and the percent of the total effect mediated ranged from 0–8%. However, the 95% quasi-Bayesian confidence intervals included the null. The CpG estimated to mediate 8% of the effect of third trimester O3 on 5-month adiposity (cg03344955) was annotated to the gene MCCC1, variants of which have been associated with Parkinson’s disease risk (92, 103).

Previous literature suggests multiple pathways by which maternal air pollution exposure may influence offspring health outcomes, and particularly those related to obesity and cardiometabolic disease. Exposures to ozone and particulate matter during pregnancy have been associated with impaired maternal glucose metabolism and gestational diabetes risk (104, 105); however, this is not consistent across studies (106, 107). A large study in southern California found positive associations of O3 and PM2.5 with gestational diabetes risk in single-pollutant models, but observed that the associations were attenuated after adjusting for other pollutants, suggesting that a different component of the air pollution mixture (such as NO2) may be responsible for observed associations (108). Offspring exposed in utero to maternal diabetes and hyperglycemia experience greater risk of obesity and metabolic disease later in life (109112).

Other maternal cardiometabolic effects associated with ambient concentrations of O3 and PM2.5 during pregnancy include higher blood pressure (113) and risk of gestational hypertension (114116), which could in turn influence fetal growth and epigenetic marks in cord blood. In a European study of 361 pregnant women, 2nd trimester PM2.5 exposure was associated with hypomethylation of the LEP gene promoter in placental tissue (36). The LEP gene codes for the protein leptin, which is an important regulator of energy intake and expenditure. Leptin dysregulation or resistance is associated with obesity (117). Finally, multiple studies of non-pregnant individuals have reported positive associations between air pollution exposure and blood lipids (118), and these effects may be more pronounced among participants with obesity (119, 120).

Extensive previous literature has examined epigenetic markers of childhood obesity, growth, and adiposity. A systematic review conducted in 2021 identified >100 studies reporting on DNA methylation in association with childhood obesity (121). Among 23 epigenome-wide association studies included in the review (most using child peripheral blood rather than cord blood), only a small number of genes were identified in more than one study as differentially methylated in association with obesity (HDAC4, PRLHR, TNXB, and PRDM16); none of these were annotated to differentially methylated regions associated with air pollutants in our study.

Our study has some limitations. Ambient air pollution exposure during pregnancy was estimated using inverse-distance-weighted averages of concentrations from stationary monitors, which may not accurately reflect concentrations inside the maternal residence. The available network of stationary monitors is not sufficiently dense to capture PM2.5 variation on a fine scale, such as residences with locally high exposure due to a nearby high-traffic road (122). Furthermore, we were unable to estimate pregnant women’s exposure to air pollution at locations other than the residential address, such as employment, commuting, or recreation sites.

DNA methylation was evaluated in umbilical cord blood, which includes a combination of cell types. Although we adjusted for seven cell types, methylation profiles may differ in other relevant offspring cell types including those in adipose tissue. Estimated proportions of cell types were not associated with the exposure in our data, however we included cell type adjustment in our main results to minimize genomic inflation and for comparability with other studies. Umbilical cord blood was collected from a convenience sample of participants in the Healthy Start cohort, but the characteristics of this sample were similar to those of the larger study population.

Additionally, this study was restricted to women who reported no sustained smoking during pregnancy, representing >90% of the Healthy Start cohort, but this exclusion may limit the generalizability of the study. Although the sample size was fairly large compared to many previous studies, statistical power to detect epigenome-wide associations after correction for multiple comparisons was limited. Finally, we adjusted for several hypothesized confounding variables, but we cannot rule out residual confounding of the results by unmeasured variables. This is particularly important for the mediation analysis, which relies on a number of strong assumptions for causal interpretation, including no unmeasured confounders of the exposure-mediator relationship or the mediator-outcome relationship (123). The degree of bias introduced by unmeasured confounders depends on the plausible magnitude of associations between the confounder and exposure, mediator, and outcome variables (123).

Notable contributions of this study include the examination of both PM2.5 and O3 in each trimester of pregnancy in relation to cord blood DNA methylation, in a relatively understudied geographic location with low PM2.5 but O3 levels that regularly exceeds federal air quality standards. We compared our epigenome-wide results to those of previous studies to attempt replication, and we examined the potential for locus-specific methylation changes to mediate previously observed associations between prenatal exposure to O3 and infant adiposity.

Conclusions

We identified several differentially methylated regions in cord blood associated with trimester-specific concentrations of ambient PM2.5 and O3 among mother-infant pairs in a Denver, Colorado-based cohort. Genes annotated to these regions are involved in health outcomes plausibly linked to air pollution exposure, including cardiometabolic disease, inflammation and neurologic disorders. We found limited evidence that differential methylation could partially mediate the previously observed association between 3rd trimester O3 concentrations and infant adiposity at 5 months of age (59); all confidence intervals included the null. Future studies will examine whether methylation differences detected at birth are associated with offspring health outcomes later in childhood and early adulthood, and therefore may serve as useful markers of adverse environmental programming received during gestation.

Supplementary Material

1
2

Highlights.

  • Air pollution during pregnancy was associated with DNA methylation in cord blood.

  • Associated genes were linked to cardiometabolic, immune, and neurologic diseases.

  • Limited support for mediation by methylation of associations with infant adiposity.

Funding Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R00ES025817, R01ES022934), the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK076648), and the National Institutes of Health Office of the Director (UH3OD023248). Funders had no involvement in the data collection, analysis, or interpretation of results, and were not involved in the writing of the article or the decision to submit the article for publication. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Declaration of interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  • 1.Lamichhane DK, Leem JH, Lee JY, Kim HC. A meta-analysis of exposure to particulate matter and adverse birth outcomes. Environ Health Toxicol. 2015;30:e2015011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Stieb DM, Chen L, Eshoul M, Judek S. Ambient air pollution, birth weight and preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Res. 2012;117:100–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Yuan L, Zhang Y, Gao Y, Tian Y. Maternal fine particulate matter (PM2.5) exposure and adverse birth outcomes: an updated systematic review based on cohort studies. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019;26(14):13963–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Smith RB, Beevers SD, Gulliver J, Dajnak D, Fecht D, Blangiardo M, et al. Impacts of air pollution and noise on risk of preterm birth and stillbirth in London. Environ Int. 2020;134:105290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Guo P, Chen Y, Wu H, Zeng J, Zeng Z, Li W, et al. Ambient air pollution and markers of fetal growth: A retrospective population-based cohort study of 2.57 million term singleton births in China. Environ Int. 2020;135:105410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Siddika N, Rantala AK, Antikainen H, Balogun H, Amegah AK, Ryti NRI, et al. Synergistic effects of prenatal exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and ozone (O3) on the risk of preterm birth: A population-based cohort study. Environ Res. 2019;176:108549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Smith RB, Fecht D, Gulliver J, Beevers SD, Dajnak D, Blangiardo M, et al. Impact of London’s road traffic air and noise pollution on birth weight: retrospective population based cohort study. BMJ. 2017;359:j5299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Li X, Huang S, Jiao A, Yang X, Yun J, Wang Y, et al. Association between ambient fine particulate matter and preterm birth or term low birth weight: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Pollut. 2017;227:596–605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Symanski E, Davila M, McHugh MK, Waller DK, Zhang X, Lai D. Maternal exposure to fine particulate pollution during narrow gestational periods and newborn health in Harris County, Texas. Matern Child Health J. 2014;18(8):2003–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Symanski E, McHugh MK, Zhang X, Craft ES, Lai D. Evaluating narrow windows of maternal exposure to ozone and preterm birth in a large urban area in Southeast Texas. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2016;26(2):167–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ritz B, Wilhelm M. Ambient air pollution and adverse birth outcomes: methodologic issues in an emerging field. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2008;102(2):182–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Darrow LA, Klein M, Flanders WD, Waller LA, Correa A, Marcus M, et al. Ambient air pollution and preterm birth: a time-series analysis. Epidemiology. 2009;20(5):689–98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Woodruff TJ, Parker JD, Darrow LA, Slama R, Bell ML, Choi H, et al. Methodological issues in studies of air pollution and reproductive health. Environ Res. 2009;109(3):311–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rappazzo KM, Daniels JL, Messer LC, Poole C, Lobdell DT. Exposure to fine particulate matter during pregnancy and risk of preterm birth among women in New Jersey, Ohio, and Pennsylvania, 2000–2005. Environ Health Perspect. 2014;122(9):992–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wang Q, Benmarhnia T, Zhang H, Knibbs LD, Sheridan P, Li C, et al. Identifying windows of susceptibility for maternal exposure to ambient air pollution and preterm birth. Environ Int. 2018;121(Pt 1):317–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Fossati S, Valvi D, Martinez D, Cirach M, Estarlich M, Fernandez-Somoano A, et al. Prenatal air pollution exposure and growth and cardio-metabolic risk in preschoolers. Environ Int. 2020;138:105619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chiu YM, Hsu HL, Wilson A, Coull BA, Pendo MP, Baccarelli A, et al. Prenatal particulate air pollution exposure and body composition in urban preschool children: Examining sensitive windows and sex-specific associations. Environ Res. 2017;158:798–805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Fleisch AF, Luttmann-Gibson H, Perng W, Rifas-Shiman SL, Coull BA, Kloog I, et al. Prenatal and early life exposure to traffic pollution and cardiometabolic health in childhood. Pediatr Obes. 2017;12(1):48–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rosa MJ, Hair GM, Just AC, Kloog I, Svensson K, Pizano-Zarate ML, et al. Identifying critical windows of prenatal particulate matter (PM2.5) exposure and early childhood blood pressure. Environ Res. 2020;182:109073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Martin EM, Fry RC. Environmental Influences on the Epigenome: Exposure- Associated DNA Methylation in Human Populations. Annu Rev Public Health. 2018;39:309–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Baccarelli A, Wright RO, Bollati V, Tarantini L, Litonjua AA, Suh HH, et al. Rapid DNA methylation changes after exposure to traffic particles. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;179(7):572–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.De Prins S, Koppen G, Jacobs G, Dons E, Van de Mieroop E, Nelen V, et al. Influence of ambient air pollution on global DNA methylation in healthy adults: a seasonal follow-up. Environ Int. 2013;59:418–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lee MK, Xu CJ, Carnes MU, Nichols CE, Ward JM, consortium B, et al. Genome-wide DNA methylation and long-term ambient air pollution exposure in Korean adults. Clin Epigenetics. 2019;11(1):37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Nwanaji-Enwerem JC, Colicino E, Trevisi L, Kloog I, Just AC, Shen J, et al. Long-term ambient particle exposures and blood DNA methylation age: findings from the VA normative aging study. Environ Epigenet. 2016;2(2). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Panni T, Mehta AJ, Schwartz JD, Baccarelli AA, Just AC, Wolf K, et al. Genome-Wide Analysis of DNA Methylation and Fine Particulate Matter Air Pollution in Three Study Populations: KORA F3, KORA F4, and the Normative Aging Study. Environ Health Perspect. 2016;124(7):983–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.G CC, Liu Y, MacDonald JW, L MR, Enquobahrie DA, A LF, et al. Epigenome-wide analysis of long-term air pollution exposure and DNA methylation in monocytes: results from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Epigenetics. 2021:1–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sordillo JE, Cardenas A, Qi C, Rifas-Shiman SL, Coull B, Luttmann-Gibson H, et al. Residential PM(2.5) exposure and the nasal methylome in children. Environ Int. 2021;153:106505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Cai J, Zhao Y, Liu P, Xia B, Zhu Q, Wang X, et al. Exposure to particulate air pollution during early pregnancy is associated with placental DNA methylation. Sci Total Environ. 2017;607–608:1103–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ladd-Acosta C, Feinberg JI, Brown SC, Lurmann FW, Croen LA, Hertz-Picciotto I, et al. Epigenetic marks of prenatal air pollution exposure found in multiple tissues relevant for child health. Environ Int. 2019;126:363–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Janssen BG, Godderis L, Pieters N, Poels K, Kicinski M, Cuypers A, et al. Placental DNA hypomethylation in association with particulate air pollution in early life. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2013;10:22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Maghbooli Z, Hossein-Nezhad A, Adabi E, Asadollah-Pour E, Sadeghi M, Mohammad-Nabi S, et al. Air pollution during pregnancy and placental adaptation in the levels of global DNA methylation. PLoS One. 2018;13(7):e0199772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kingsley SL, Eliot MN, Whitsel EA, Huang YT, Kelsey KT, Marsit CJ, et al. Maternal residential proximity to major roadways, birth weight, and placental DNA methylation. Environ Int. 2016;92–93:43–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Abraham E, Rousseaux S, Agier L, Giorgis-Allemand L, Tost J, Galineau J, et al. Pregnancy exposure to atmospheric pollution and meteorological conditions and placental DNA methylation. Environment International. 2018;118:334–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zhao Y, Wang P, Zhou Y, Xia B, Zhu Q, Ge W, et al. Prenatal fine particulate matter exposure, placental DNA methylation changes, and fetal growth. Environ Int. 2021;147:106313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Deyssenroth MA, Rosa MJ, Eliot MN, Kelsey KT, Kloog I, Schwartz JD, et al. Placental gene networks at the interface between maternal PM(2.5) exposure early in gestation and reduced infant birthweight. Environ Res. 2021;199:111342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Saenen ND, Vrijens K, Janssen BG, Roels HA, Neven KY, Vanden Berghe W, et al. Lower Placental Leptin Promoter Methylation in Association with Fine Particulate Matter Air Pollution during Pregnancy and Placental Nitrosative Stress at Birth in the ENVIRONAGE Cohort. Environ Health Perspect. 2017;125(2):262–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kresovich JK, Zheng Y, Cardenas A, Joyce BT, Rifas-Shiman SL, Oken E, et al. Cord blood DNA methylation and adiposity measures in early and mid-childhood. Clin Epigenetics. 2017;9:86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Gonzalez-Nahm S, Mendez MA, Benjamin-Neelon SE, Murphy SK, Hogan VK, Rowley DL, et al. DNA methylation of imprinted genes at birth is associated with child weight status at birth, 1 year, and 3 years. Clin Epigenetics. 2018;10:90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wu S, Gennings C, Wright RJ, Wilson A, Burris HH, Just AC, et al. Prenatal Stress, Methylation in Inflammation-Related Genes, and Adiposity Measures in Early Childhood: the Programming Research in Obesity, Growth Environment and Social Stress Cohort Study. Psychosom Med. 2018;80(1):34–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Martin CL, Jima D, Sharp GC, McCullough LE, Park SS, Gowdy KM, et al. Maternal pre-pregnancy obesity, offspring cord blood DNA methylation, and offspring cardiometabolic health in early childhood: an epigenome-wide association study. Epigenetics. 2019;14(4):325–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Reese SE, Xu CJ, den Dekker HT, Lee MK, Sikdar S, Ruiz-Arenas C, et al. Epigenome-wide meta-analysis of DNA methylation and childhood asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019;143(6):2062–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Cardenas A, Rifas-Shiman SL, Agha G, Hivert MF, Litonjua AA, DeMeo DL, et al. Persistent DNA methylation changes associated with prenatal mercury exposure and cognitive performance during childhood. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Suarez A, Lahti J, Czamara D, Lahti-Pulkkinen M, Knight AK, Girchenko P, et al. The Epigenetic Clock at Birth: Associations With Maternal Antenatal Depression and Child Psychiatric Problems. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2018;57(5):321–8 e2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Herbstman JB, Tang D, Zhu D, Qu L, Sjodin A, Li Z, et al. Prenatal exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, benzo[a]pyrene-DNA adducts, and genomic DNA methylation in cord blood. Environ Health Perspect. 2012;120(5):733–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Yang P, Gong YJ, Cao WC, Wang RX, Wang YX, Liu C, et al. Prenatal urinary polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon metabolites, global DNA methylation in cord blood, and birth outcomes: A cohort study in China. Environ Pollut. 2018;234:396–405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Breton CV, Yao J, Millstein J, Gao L, Siegmund KD, Mack W, et al. Prenatal Air Pollution Exposures, DNA Methyl Transferase Genotypes, and Associations with Newborn LINE1 and Alu Methylation and Childhood Blood Pressure and Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in the Children’s Health Study. Environ Health Perspect. 2016;124(12):1905–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Liu X, Ye Y, Chen Y, Li X, Feng B, Cao G, et al. Effects of prenatal exposure to air particulate matter on the risk of preterm birth and roles of maternal and cord blood LINE-1 methylation: A birth cohort study in Guangzhou, China. Environ Int. 2019;133(Pt A):105177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Lee J, Kalia V, Perera F, Herbstman J, Li T, Nie J, et al. Prenatal airborne polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposure, LINE1 methylation and child development in a Chinese cohort. Environ Int. 2017;99:315–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.He T, Zhu J, Wang J, Ren X, Cheng G, Liu X, et al. Ambient air pollution, H19/DMR methylation in cord blood and newborn size: A pilot study in Zhengzhou City, China. Chemosphere. 2018;212:863–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Zhou G, He T, Huang H, Feng F, Liu X, Li Z, et al. Prenatal ambient air pollution exposure and SOD2 promoter methylation in maternal and cord blood. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2019;181:428–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Feng F, Huang L, Zhou G, Wang J, Zhang R, Li Z, et al. GPR61 methylation in cord blood: a potential target of prenatal exposure to air pollutants. Int J Environ Health Res. 2020:1–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Wang C, Plusquin M, Ghantous A, Herceg Z, Alfano R, Cox B, et al. DNA methylation of insulin-like growth factor 2 and H19 cluster in cord blood and prenatal air pollution exposure to fine particulate matter. Environ Health. 2020;19(1):129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Tang WY, Levin L, Talaska G, Cheung YY, Herbstman J, Tang D, et al. Maternal exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and 5’-CpG methylation of interferon-gamma in cord white blood cells. Environ Health Perspect. 2012;120(8):1195–200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Perera F, Tang WY, Herbstman J, Tang D, Levin L, Miller R, et al. Relation of DNA methylation of 5’-CpG island of ACSL3 to transplacental exposure to airborne polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and childhood asthma. PLoS One. 2009;4(2):e4488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Plusquin M, Chadeau-Hyam M, Ghantous A, Alfano R, Bustamante M, Chatzi L, et al. DNA Methylome Marks of Exposure to Particulate Matter at Three Time Points in Early Life. Environ Sci Technol. 2018;52(9):5427–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Peng C, den Dekker M, Cardenas A, Rifas-Shiman SL, Gibson H, Agha G, et al. Residential Proximity to Major Roadways at Birth, DNA Methylation at Birth and Midchildhood, and Childhood Cognitive Test Scores: Project Viva (Massachusetts, USA). Environmental Health Perspectives. 2018;126(9). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Gruzieva O, Xu CJ, Yousefi P, Relton C, Merid SK, Breton CV, et al. Prenatal Particulate Air Pollution and DNA Methylation in Newborns: An Epigenome-Wide Meta-Analysis. Environ Health Perspect. 2019;127(5):57012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Gruzieva O, Xu CJ, Breton CV, Annesi-Maesano I, Anto JM, Auffray C, et al. Epigenome-Wide Meta-Analysis of Methylation in Children Related to Prenatal NO2 Air Pollution Exposure. Environ Health Perspect. 2017;125(1):104–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Starling AP, Moore BF, Thomas DSK, Peel JL, Zhang W, Adgate JL, et al. Prenatal exposure to traffic and ambient air pollution and infant weight and adiposity: The Healthy Start study. Environ Res. 2020;182:109130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.EPA U. Determinations of Attainment by the Attainment Date, Extension of the Attainment Date, and Reclassification of Areas Classified as Serious for the 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards. Federal Register; 2022. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Yang IV, Pedersen BS, Liu AH, O’Connor GT, Pillai D, Kattan M, et al. The nasal methylome and childhood atopic asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;139(5):1478–88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Starling AP, Liu C, Shen G, Yang IV, Kechris K, Borengasser SJ, et al. Prenatal Exposure to Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances, Umbilical Cord Blood DNA Methylation, and Cardio-Metabolic Indicators in Newborns: The Healthy Start Study. Environ Health Perspect. 2020;128(12):127014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Gervin K, Salas LA, Bakulski KM, van Zelm MC, Koestler DC, Wiencke JK, et al. Systematic evaluation and validation of reference and library selection methods for deconvolution of cord blood DNA methylation data. Clin Epigenetics. 2019;11(1):125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Chen YA, Lemire M, Choufani S, Butcher DT, Grafodatskaya D, Zanke BW, et al. Discovery of cross-reactive probes and polymorphic CpGs in the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 microarray. Epigenetics. 2013;8(2):203–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Touleimat N, Tost J. Complete pipeline for Infinium(®) Human Methylation 450K BeadChip data processing using subset quantile normalization for accurate DNA methylation estimation. Epigenomics. 2012;4(3):325–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Hoaglin DC, Iglewicz B, Tukey JW. Performance of some resistant rules for outlier labeling. J Am Stat Assoc. 1986;81:991–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Merid SK, Novoloaca A, Sharp GC, Kupers LK, Kho AT, Roy R, et al. Epigenome-wide meta-analysis of blood DNA methylation in newborns and children identifies numerous loci related to gestational age. Genome Med. 2020;12(1):17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Narasimhan B, Chu G. impute: impute: Imputation for microarray data. R package version 1.64.0. . 2020.
  • 69.Leek JT, Johnson WE, Parker HS, Jaffe AE, Storey JD. The sva package for removing batch effects and other unwanted variation in high-throughput experiments. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(6):882–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate - a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B-Methodological. 1995;57(1):289–300. [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Ren X, Kuan PF. methylGSA: a Bioconductor package and Shiny app for DNA methylation data length bias adjustment in gene set testing. Bioinformatics. 2019;35(11):1958–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Pedersen BS, Schwartz DA, Yang IV, Kechris KJ. Comb-p: software for combining, analyzing, grouping and correcting spatially correlated P-values. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(22):2986–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Durinck S, Spellman PT, Birney E, Huber W. Mapping identifiers for the integration of genomic datasets with the R/Bioconductor package biomaRt. Nat Protoc. 2009;4(8):1184–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Tingley D, Yamamoto T, Hirose K, Keele L, Imai K. mediation: R Package for Causal Mediation Analysis. Journal of Statistical Software. 2014;59(5):1–38.26917999 [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Ashiq S, Ashiq K. The Role of Paraoxonase 1 (PON1) Gene Polymorphisms in Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Biochem Genet. 2021;59(4):919–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Wu S, Teng MS, Er LK, Hsiao WY, Hsu LA, Yeh CH, et al. Association between NF-κB Pathway Gene Variants and sICAM1 Levels in Taiwanese. PLoS One. 2017;12(1):e0169516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Ji F, Liu Y, Hao JG, Wang LP, Dai MJ, Shen GF, et al. KLB gene polymorphism is associated with obesity and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in the Han Chinese. Aging (Albany NY). 2019;11(18):7847–58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Rodríguez-Rodero S, Menéndez-Torre E, Fernández-Bayón G, Morales-Sánchez P, Sanz L, Turienzo E, et al. Altered intragenic DNA methylation of HOOK2 gene in adipose tissue from individuals with obesity and type 2 diabetes. PLoS One. 2017;12(12):e0189153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Qi Q, Menzaghi C, Smith S, Liang L, de Rekeneire N, Garcia ME, et al. Genome-wide association analysis identifies TYW3/CRYZ and NDST4 loci associated with circulating resistin levels. Hum Mol Genet. 2012;21(21):4774–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Zhai D, Li S, Zhao Y, Lin Z. SLC6A3 is a risk factor for Parkinson’s disease: a meta-analysis of sixteen years’ studies. Neurosci Lett. 2014;564:99–104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Mori K, Moteki H, Kobayashi Y, Azaiez H, Booth KT, Nishio SY, et al. Mutations in LOXHD1 gene cause various types and severities of hearing loss. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2015;124 Suppl 1(1 0):135s–41s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Ouellette AR, Neuner SM, Dumitrescu L, Anderson LC, Gatti DM, Mahoney ER, et al. Cross-Species Analyses Identify Dlgap2 as a Regulator of Age-Related Cognitive Decline and Alzheimer’s Dementia. Cell reports. 2020;32(9):108091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Li JM, Lu CL, Cheng MC, Luu SU, Hsu SH, Hu TM, et al. Role of the DLGAP2 gene encoding the SAP90/PSD-95-associated protein 2 in schizophrenia. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e85373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Kofler DM, Severson CA, Mousissian N, De Jager PL, Hafler DA. The CD6 multiple sclerosis susceptibility allele is associated with alterations in CD4+ T cell proliferation. J Immunol. 2011;187(6):3286–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Zhou H, Brekman A, Zuo WL, Ou X, Shaykhiev R, Agosto-Perez FJ, et al. POU2AF1 Functions in the Human Airway Epithelium To Regulate Expression of Host Defense Genes. J Immunol. 2016;196(7):3159–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Chen B, Ying X, Bao L. MGMT gene promoter methylation in humoral tissue as biomarker for lung cancer diagnosis: An update meta-analysis. Thorac Cancer. 2021;12(23):3194–200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Tada Y, Yamaguchi Y, Kinjo T, Song X, Akagi T, Takamura H, et al. The stem cell transcription factor ZFP57 induces IGF2 expression to promote anchorage-independent growth in cancer cells. Oncogene. 2015;34(6):752–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Gokulnath P, Soriano AA, de Cristofaro T, Di Palma T, Zannini M. PAX8, an Emerging Player in Ovarian Cancer. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2021;1330:95–112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Kim JY, Choi BG, Jelinek J, Kim DH, Lee SH, Cho K, et al. Promoter methylation changes in ALOX12 and AIRE1: novel epigenetic markers for atherosclerosis. Clin Epigenetics. 2020;12(1):66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Priyanka K, Singh S, Gill K. Paraoxonase 3: Structure and Its Role in Pathophysiology of Coronary Artery Disease. Biomolecules. 2019;9(12). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Zang L, Hong Q, Yang G, Gu W, Wang A, Dou J, et al. MACROD1/LRP16 Enhances LPS-Stimulated Inflammatory Responses by Up-Regulating a Rac1-Dependent Pathway in Adipocytes. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018;51(6):2591–603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Li NN, Tan EK, Chang XL, Mao XY, Zhao DM, Zhang JH, et al. MCCC1/LAMP3 reduces risk of sporadic Parkinson’s disease in Han Chinese. Acta Neurol Scand. 2013;128(2):136–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.You YA, Kwon EJ, Hwang HS, Choi SJ, Choi SK, Kim YJ. Elevated methylation of the vault RNA2–1 promoter in maternal blood is associated with preterm birth. BMC Genomics. 2021;22(1):528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Furlong CE, Suzuki SM, Stevens RC, Marsillach J, Richter RJ, Jarvik GP, et al. Human PON1, a biomarker of risk of disease and exposure. Chem Biol Interact. 2010;187(1–3):355–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Xu FL, Ding M, Wu X, Liu YP, Xia X, Yao J, et al. A Meta-analysis of the Association Between SLC6A3 Gene Polymorphisms and Schizophrenia. J Mol Neurosci. 2020;70(2):155–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Rubino A, D’Addario C, Di Bartolomeo M, Michele Salamone E, Locuratolo N, Fattapposta F, et al. DNA methylation of the 5’-UTR DAT 1 gene in Parkinson’s disease patients. Acta Neurol Scand. 2020;142(3):275–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Lambacher G, Pascale E, Pucci M, Mangiapelo S, D’Addario C, Adriani W. Search for an epigenetic biomarker in ADHD diagnosis, based on the DAT1 gene 5’-UTR methylation: a new possible approach. Psychiatry Res. 2020;291:113154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.De Jager PL, Jia X, Wang J, de Bakker PI, Ottoboni L, Aggarwal NT, et al. Meta-analysis of genome scans and replication identify CD6, IRF8 and TNFRSF1A as new multiple sclerosis susceptibility loci. Nat Genet. 2009;41(7):776–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Maltby VE, Lea RA, Sanders KA, White N, Benton MC, Scott RJ, et al. Differential methylation at MHC in CD4(+) T cells is associated with multiple sclerosis independently of HLA-DRB1. Clin Epigenetics. 2017;9:71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Pineau F, Caimmi D, Taviaux S, Reveil M, Brosseau L, Rivals I, et al. DNA Methylation at ATP11A cg11702988 Is a Biomarker of Lung Disease Severity in Cystic Fibrosis: A Longitudinal Study. Genes (Basel). 2021;12(3). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Fu XW, Song PF, Spindel ER. Role of Lynx1 and related Ly6 proteins as modulators of cholinergic signaling in normal and neoplastic bronchial epithelium. Int Immunopharmacol. 2015;29(1):93–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Renauer P, Coit P, Jeffries MA, Merrill JT, McCune WJ, Maksimowicz-McKinnon K, et al. DNA methylation patterns in naïve CD4+ T cells identify epigenetic susceptibility loci for malar rash and discoid rash in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus Sci Med. 2015;2(1):e000101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Zhao A, Li Y, Niu M, Li G, Luo N, Zhou L, et al. SNPs in SNCA, MCCC1, DLG2, GBF1 and MBNL2 are associated with Parkinson’s disease in southern Chinese population. J Cell Mol Med. 2020;24(15):8744–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Yao M, Liu Y, Jin D, Yin W, Ma S, Tao R, et al. Relationship betweentemporal distribution of air pollution exposure and glucose homeostasis during pregnancy. Environ Res. 2020;185:109456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Robledo CA, Mendola P, Yeung E, Mannisto T, Sundaram R, Liu D, et al. Preconception and early pregnancy air pollution exposures and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus. Environ Res. 2015;137:316–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Tang X, Zhou JB, Luo F, Han Y, Heianza Y, Cardoso MA, et al. Air pollution and gestational diabetes mellitus: evidence from cohort studies. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020;8(1). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Zhang H, Wang Q, He S, Wu K, Ren M, Dong H, et al. Ambient air pollution and gestational diabetes mellitus: A review of evidence from biological mechanisms to population epidemiology. Sci Total Environ. 2020;719:137349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Jo H, Eckel SP, Chen JC, Cockburn M, Martinez MP, Chow T, et al. Associations of gestational diabetes mellitus with residential air pollution exposure in a large Southern California pregnancy cohort. Environ Int. 2019;130:104933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Crume TL, Ogden L, Daniels S, Hamman RF, Norris JM, Dabelea D. The impact of in utero exposure to diabetes on childhood body mass index growth trajectories: the EPOCH study. J Pediatr. 2011;158(6):941–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Dabelea D, Hanson RL, Lindsay RS, Pettitt DJ, Imperatore G, Gabir MM, et al. Intrauterine exposure to diabetes conveys risks for type 2 diabetes and obesity: a study of discordant sibships. Diabetes. 2000;49(12):2208–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Dabelea D, Pettitt DJ. Intrauterine diabetic environment confers risks for type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity in the offspring, in addition to genetic susceptibility. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2001;14(8):1085–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Josefson JL, Catalano PM, Lowe WL, Scholtens DM, Kuang A, Dyer AR, et al. The Joint Associations of Maternal BMI and Glycemia with Childhood Adiposity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Cao W, Dong M, Sun X, Liu X, Xiao J, Feng B, et al. Associations of maternal ozone exposures during pregnancy with maternal blood pressure and risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: A birth cohort study in Guangzhou, China. Environ Res. 2020;183:109207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Yang R, Luo D, Zhang YM, Hu K, Qian ZM, Hu LQ, et al. Adverse Effects of Exposure to Fine Particulate Matters and Ozone on Gestational Hypertension. Current medical science. 2019;39(6):1019–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Nobles CJ, Williams A, Ouidir M, Sherman S, Mendola P. Differential Effect of Ambient Air Pollution Exposure on Risk of Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia. Hypertension. 2019;74(2):384–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Hu H, Ha S, Roth J, Kearney G, Talbott EO, Xu X. Ambient Air Pollution and Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Atmos Environ (1994). 2014;97:336–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Crujeiras AB, Carreira MC, Cabia B, Andrade S, Amil M, Casanueva FF. Leptin resistance in obesity: An epigenetic landscape. Life Sci. 2015;140:57–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Gaio V, Roquette R, Dias CM, Nunes B. Ambient air pollution and lipid profile: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Pollut. 2019;254(Pt B):113036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Kim JS, Chen Z, Alderete TL, Toledo-Corral C, Lurmann F, Berhane K, et al. Associations of air pollution, obesity and cardiometabolic health in young adults: The Meta-AIR study. Environ Int. 2019;133(Pt A):105180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Yang BY, Bloom MS, Markevych I, Qian ZM, Vaughn MG, Cummings-Vaughn LA, et al. Exposure to ambient air pollution and blood lipids in adults: The 33 Communities Chinese Health Study. Environ Int. 2018;119:485–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Alfano R, Robinson O, Handakas E, Nawrot TS, Vineis P, Plusquin M. Perspectives and challenges of epigenetic determinants of childhood obesity: A systematic review. Obes Rev. 2021:e13389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Pollution HPotHEoT-RA. Traffic-related air pollution: a critical review of the literature on emissions, exposure, and health effects. HEI Special Report 17.: Health Effects Institute; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Lutz SM, Thwing A, Schmiege S, Kroehl M, Baker CD, Starling AP, et al. Examining the role of unmeasured confounding in mediation analysis with genetic and genomic applications. BMC Bioinformatics. 2017;18(1):344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1
2

RESOURCES