Skip to main content
Nature Portfolio logoLink to Nature Portfolio
. 2022 Nov 18;37(8):718–725. doi: 10.1038/s41371-022-00772-z

Inflammation, sex, blood pressure changes and hypertension in midlife: the Hordaland Health Study

Ester Kringeland 1,, Eva Gerdts 1, Arve Ulvik 2, Grethe S Tell 3, Jannicke Igland 3, Teresa R Haugsgjerd 1, Per Magne Ueland 2, Helga Midtbø 1,4
PMCID: PMC10403349  PMID: 36400946

Abstract

Our aim was to test sex-specific associations of circulating markers of inflammation with blood pressure (BP) and incident hypertension in midlife. Participants in the Hordaland Health study (n = 3280, 56% women, mean age 48 years) were examined at baseline and followed for 6 years. Circulating levels of inflammatory markers including high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), neopterin, and pyridoxic acid ratio (PAr) index were measured at follow-up. The associations with systolic/diastolic BP and incident hypertension were tested in sex-specific linear- or logistic-regression analyses adjusted for body mass index, serum triglycerides, creatinine, physical activity, smoking and diabetes. At follow-up, women had lower mean BP than men (124/72 vs. 130/78 mmHg, p < 0.001). Higher hs-CRP was significantly associated with greater systolic and diastolic BP (standardized β = 0.07 and β = 0.09, both p < 0.01) in women, but not in men. Higher neopterin was associated with higher diastolic BP in women and higher PAr index was associated with higher diastolic BP in women and higher systolic and diastolic BP in men (all p < 0.01). Compared to hs-CRP < 1 mg/l, higher levels of hs-CRP 1–<3 mg/l and hs-CRP ≥ 3 mg/l were associated with new-onset hypertension only in women (odds ratio (OR) 1.74, 95% CI 1.20–2.53 and OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.20–2.90). Sex-interactions were found for hs-CRP and neopterin in models on incident hypertension and diastolic BP, respectively (both p < 0.05). Higher levels of circulating markers of inflammation were associated with higher BP and incident hypertension in a sex-specific manner. Our results suggest a sex-specific interaction between cardiovascular inflammation and BP in midlife.

Subject terms: Risk factors, Diseases

Introduction

Elevated blood pressure (BP) is the leading risk factor for cardiovascular disease and mortality [1]. Sex differences in BP development over the life course have been identified, where women have a steeper increase in BP with aging, starting already in the third decade of life [2]. Further, we recently reported that the risk for acute coronary syndromes

increased at a lower BP level in women than in men participating in the community-based Hordaland Health Study [3]. The underlying causes for these sex-differences in BP development have not been established; however, evidence from experimental studies indicates that sex-specific activation of the immune system may contribute [4, 5]. In particular, vascular activation of T cells in response to stimuli like angiotensin 2 and high salt intake seems to be central for BP development in animal studies [4]. These activated T cells may modulate the BP response through production of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interferon gamma (IFN-γ) that stimulates production of neopterin by macrophages, and metabolism of the essential amino acid tryptophan through the kynurenine pathway [6, 7]. The degree of T cell activation may be assessed through measurement of neopterin and the kynurenine-tryptophan ratio (KTR) [8].

Previous studies in community-based cohorts have documented that elevated circulating levels of high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), neopterin, KTR and the pyridoxic acid ratio (PAr index), the latter reflecting altered vitamin B6 catabolism during inflammation, are associated with high BP [914]. Furthermore, elevated circulating levels of these inflammatory markers have been reported to be associated with risk of cardiovascular disease [11, 12, 14, 15, 16]. However, there is a paucity of clinical information on the sex-specific associations between these prognostic inflammatory markers and BP development. In the present analysis, we explored the sex-specific associations of prognostically validated circulating markers of inflammation with systolic and diastolic BP and new onset hypertension over the past 6 years in middle-aged women and men participating in the Hordaland Health Study [17].

Methods

Study population

The community-based Hordaland Health Study was initiated in Hordaland County in Western Norway as a collaboration between the National Health Screening Service, the University of Bergen and local health services in 1992 (https://husk-en.w.uib.no/). Eligible subjects were identified from the National Population Registry based on year of birth and site of residence. The cohort used in the present analysis includes 3700 women and men born in 1950–1951 participating in the 1st and 2nd Hordaland Health Survey in 1992–1993 and 1997–1999, respectively [17]. Participation rate was above 70% in both surveys. We excluded participants with missing data on BP (n = 6), circulating markers of inflammation (n = 264) body mass index (BMI) (n = 4), serum creatinine (n = 1) and physical activity (n = 164), leaving 1829 women and 1451 men eligible for the present study. The study was performed according to the declaration of Helsinki, and the study protocol was approved by the Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics (2017/294). All participants provided written informed consent.

Blood pressure measurement

Study participants were examined following standardized protocols in 1992–1993 and 1997–1999. Attended brachial BP was measured in seated position after a minimum of 2 min rest with calibrated sphygmomanometers (Dinamap 845 XT or Dinamap 8100, Criticon, Tampa, FL, USA). BP was measured three times by trained health care workers, and the average of the two last measurements was used for analyses. Hypertension was defined as BP ≥ 130/80 mmHg or self-reported use of antihypertensive drugs [18].

Other cardiovascular disease risk factors

Information about use of antihypertensive medication in 1992–1993 (baseline) was collected in self-reported questionnaires. Likewise, information about physical activity, smoking, medical history and use of medication in 1997–1999 (follow-up) was collected in self-reported questionnaires. Physical activity was categorized as none, <1 h, 1–2 h or ≥3 h per week of vigorous physical activity resulting in sweating or shortness of breath. Smoking was defined as self-reported daily smoking or serum cotinine ≥85 nmol/l [19]. Diabetes was defined as self-reported diabetes, use of antidiabetic medication, a serum glucose level ≥11.1 mmol/l in participants who had eaten during the last 8 h and/or a serum glucose level ≥7.0 mmol/l in participants who had been fasting for at least 8 h. Weight was measured with light clothing to the nearest half-kilogram, and height was measured without shoes to the nearest centimeter. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight in kg/height in meters2 and obesity was defined as BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2. Serum triglycerides were measured in non-fasting blood samples.

Biochemical analyses

Non-fasting blood samples were collected at follow-up, kept on ice before centrifugation (for less than 3 h), and stored at −80 °C before analysis.

Plasma concentrations of tryptophan, kynurenine, neopterin, 4-pyridoxic acid, pyridoxal 5’-phosphate, pyridoxal, cotinine, and creatinine were quantified by LC-tandem MS at Bevital, Bergen, Norway (www.bevital.no) [20]. Plasma hs-CRP was measured with an immuno-Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization–based assay [21]. KTR was calculated by dividing the plasma concentration of kynurenine (nmol/l) by the concentration of tryptophan (mmol/l), and the PAr index was defined as the ratio plasma 4-pyridoxic acid: (pyridoxal + pyridoxal-5’-phosphate) [10].

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were done using STATA, version 17 (Stata Corp LP, College Station, TX, USA). Continuous variables are expressed as means and standard deviations (SD) or medians and interquartile ranges (IQR) for variables (serum triglycerides, hs-CRP, neopterin, KTR and PAr) not normally distributed. Categorical variables are presented as numbers and percentages. Comparisons between groups were done using the Student’s t-test or the Chi-square test. For non-normally distributed variables comparisons of medians between groups were done using quantile regression. Cross-sectional associations between inflammatory markers and systolic and diastolic BP measured at follow-up were tested in univariable and multivariable linear regression analyses. Likewise, associations between inflammatory markers measured at follow-up with changes in systolic and diastolic BP during the past 6 years were tested by linear regression analyses. Results are reported as standardized β-coefficients and p values. For the analysis of new onset hypertension at follow-up, participants with hypertension at baseline were excluded (n = 1599). Associations between inflammatory markers and new onset hypertension at follow-up were tested by logistic regression analyses. Results are reported as odds ratios (OR), 95% confidence intervals (CI) and p values. The inflammatory markers were all non-normally distributed and log-transformed before inclusion in linear or logistic regression analyses. Separate analyses were performed for women and men. To test for interactions with sex in the associations between circulating markers of inflammation and blood pressure/hypertension, we compared a model with and without an interaction term, using the likelihood-ratio test. Multivariable model 1 was adjusted for BMI. Model 2 was adjusted for BMI, serum creatinine, physical activity, daily smoking, diabetes, and non-fasting serum triglycerides. In addition, multivariable models on changes in systolic and diastolic BP were adjusted for systolic or diastolic BP measured at baseline, respectively. We performed sensitivity analyses after exclusion of participants taking antihypertensive medication at baseline and/or follow up (n = 169) and of participants with prior myocardial infarction and stroke (n = 32).

Results

Characteristics of the study population in the Hordaland Health Study

At follow-up, women had lower systolic and diastolic BP and lower prevalence of hypertension compared to men (all p < 0.001) (Table 1). In participants with hypertension, 13% of women and 9% of men were taking antihypertensive medication (p = 0.03). Women had lower hs-CRP and higher neopterin and PAr levels than men (all p < 0.05), while KTR did not differ according to sex (p < 0.05) (Table 1). Women also had lower BMI and serum creatinine (both p < 0.001) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Characteristics of the study population at follow-up in 1997–1999: the Hordaland Health Study.

Women n = 1829 Men n = 1451 p for sex difference
Age, years 48 ± 1 48 ± 1 0.36
Systolic BP, mmHg 124 ± 16 130 ± 14 <0.01
Diastolic BP, mmHg 72 ± 11 78 ± 10 <0.01
Δ systolic BP during 6 years follow-up 1.8 ± 12 −1.3 ± 11 <0.01
Δ diastolic BP during 6 years follow-up −3.8 ± 8.4 −1.7 ± 8.6 <0.01
Hypertension, n (%) 670 (37) 836 (58) <0.01
Patients with treated hypertension, n (%) 85 (13) 77 (9) 0.03
Body mass index, kg/m2 24.8 ± 4.0 26.1 ± 3.1 <0.01
Obesity, n (%) 195 (10) 184 (11) 0.13
Creatinine, mmol/l 82 ± 9 95 ± 11 <0.01
Serum triglycerides, median (IQR), mmol/l 1.2 (0.9–1.7) 1.8 (1.2–2.5) <0.01
Smoking, n (%) 673 (37) 552 (38) 0.46
Diabetes, n (%) 10 (0.55) 27 (1.9) <0.01
Physical activity, n (%) <0.01
     None 554 (30) 336 (23)
     <1 h/week 480 (26) 443 (31)
     1–2 h/week 580 (32) 425 (29)
     ≥3 h/week 215 (12) 247 (17)
Myocardial infarction, n (%) 1 (0.06) 16 (1.11) <0.01
Stroke, n (%) 10 (0.55) 5 (0.34) 0.56
hs-CRP, median (IQR) mg/l 1.01 (0.43–2.56) 1.15 (0.53–2.62) 0.02
Neopterin, median (IQR) nmol/l 7.07 (6.02–8.36) 6.69 (5.72–7.86) <0.01
Kynurenine, median (IQR) µmol/l 1.39 (1.23–1.57) 1.53 (1.36–1.71) <0.01
Tryptophan, median (IQR) µmol/l 68.2 (60.8–76.6) 75.8 (67.5–84.1) <0.01
KTR, median (IQR) nmol/µmol 20.1 (18.0–22.6) 20.3 (18.0–22.5) 0.38
PAr, median (IQR) 0.36 (0.28–0.47) 0.31 (0.25–0.41) <0.01

Values are given as means (SD) unless otherwise indicated.

BP blood pressure, Hypertension BP ≥ 130/80 mmHg or use of antihypertensive medication, hs-CRP high-sensitive C-reactive protein, KTR kynurenine:tryptophan ratio, PAr index ratio 4-pyridoxic acid/(pyridoxal 5’-phosphate + pyridoxal), SD standard deviation, IQR interquartile range.

Association of BP with circulating markers of inflammation in women and men

Women

Univariable results are presented in Table 2 and Figs. 1 and 2. Higher hs-CRP was significantly associated with higher systolic and diastolic BP after adjustment for creatinine, physical activity, daily smoking, diabetes, and non-fasting serum triglycerides (Table 2, model 2) (β = 0.07 for systolic, and β = 0.09 for diastolic BP, respectively, both p < 0.01). Higher plasma neopterin and higher PAr index was associated with higher diastolic BP (β = 0.09, and β = 0.05, both p < 0.01). No significant associations between KTR and systolic (β = −0.03) or diastolic (β = 0.02) BP was found (both p > 0.05) (Table 2).

Table 2.

Association of systolic and diastolic BP with levels of circulating markers of inflammation in 46–49 years old women and men: the Hordaland Health study.

Women Men Interaction biomarker and sex
Variable Univariable Model 1 Model 2 Univariable Model 1 Model 2 Univariable Model 1 Model 2
β p β p β p β p β p β p p p p
Systolic BP
    hs-CRP 0.172 <0.01 0.081 <0.01 0.072 <0.01 0.102 <0.01 0.036 0.17 0.038 0.16 0.03 0.37 0.50
    Neopterin −0.001 0.98 0.001 0.97 −0.004 0.85 −0.039 0.13 −0.037 0.14 −0.038 0.15 0.30 0.29 0.38
    KTR 0.013 0.58 −0.032 0.16 −0.031 0.18 −0.009 0.72 −0.025 0.32 −0.027 0.31 0.53 0.67 0.79
    PAR index −0.002 0.95 0.004 0.87 0.007 0.75 0.065 0.01 0.065 <0.01 0.066 <0.01 0.07 0.07 0.08
Diastolic BP
    hs-CRP 0.165 <0.01 0.101 <0.01 0.087 <0.01 0.094 <0.01 0.04 0.13 0.042 0.13 0.04 0.14 0.20
    Neopterin 0.084 <0.01 0.085 <0.01 0.087 <0.01 −0.004 0.87 −0.002 0.93 0.008 0.76 0.01 0.02 0.01
    KTR 0.049 0.04 0.015 0.51 0.021 0.38 0.023 0.38 0.010 0.70 0.019 0.49 0.41 0.99 0.97
    PAR index 0.045 0.06 0.049 0.03 0.049 0.03 0.079 <0.01 0.084 <0.01 0.089 <0.01 0.34 0.35 0.39

Model 1 is adjusted for body mass index. Model 2 is in addition adjusted for serum creatinine, physical activity, daily smoking, diabetes, and non-fasting serum triglycerides.

BP blood pressure, hs-CRP high-sensitive C-reactive protein, PAr index ratio: 4-pyridoxic acid/(pyridoxal 5’-phosphate + pyridoxal), KTR kynurenin:tryptophan ratio.

Significant associations are printed in bold.

Fig. 1. GAM plots demonstrating univariable associations of hs-CRP with systolic and diastolic blood pressure in 46–49 years old women and men in the Hordaland Health Study.

Fig. 1

The solid lines indicate blood pressure and the shaded areas 95% confidence intervals. Density plots indicate distributions, and the vertical white lines indicate the 5th, 20th, 50th, 80th and 95th percentiles of hs-CRP. CRP high-sensitive C-reactive protein.

Fig. 2. Associations of four circulating markers of inflammation (hs-CRP, neopterin, PAr index and KTR) with systolic and diastolic blood pressure in 46–49 years old women and men in the Hordaland Health Study.

Fig. 2

Red (women) and blue (men) diamonds indicate standardized beta coefficients and lines 95% confidence intervals from univariable linear regression analysis, respectively. p p for interaction between biomarker and sex, CRP high-sensitive C-reactive protein, PAr the ratio plasma 4-pyridoxic acid: (pyridoxal + pyridoxal-5’-phosphate), KTR kynurenine:tryptophan ratio.

Men

Univariable results are presented in Table 2 and Figs. 1 and 2. In adjusted analyses, higher hs-CRP was neither associated with higher systolic nor diastolic BP (both β = 0.04, p > 0.05) (Table 2, model 2). A higher plasma PAr index was associated with higher systolic (β = 0.07) and diastolic (β = 0.09) BP (both p < 0.01) (Table 2). There were no significant associations between plasma neopterin with systolic (β = −0.04) or diastolic (β = 0.008) BP (both p > 0.05) (Table 2, model 2). Further, there were no associations between KTR with systolic (β = −0.03) or diastolic (β = 0.02) BP in men (both p > 0.05) (Table 2, model 2).

Significant interactions between plasma hs-CRP and sex were found in univariable analyses for systolic and diastolic BP (both p < 0.05). A significant sex-interaction with neopterin was found in the model on diastolic BP (p = 0.01) (Table 2), indicating that neopterin has a significantly stronger association with diastolic BP in women compared to men.

Association of BP changes over the prior 6 years with circulating markers of inflammation in women and men

Over 6 years follow-up, women had an increase in systolic BP and a decrease in diastolic BP, while men had decreases in both systolic and diastolic BP (both p < 0.01 for sex-difference) (Table 1).

Women

Univariable results are presented in Table 3. In adjusted analysis, higher hs-CRP at follow-up was associated with larger increases in systolic (β = 0.07) and diastolic (β = 0.08) BP over the prior 6 years (both p < 0.01) (Table 3, model 2). Higher plasma neopterin was associated with a larger increase in diastolic BP (β = 0.07) over the prior 6 years (p < 0.01) (Table 3). Neither the PAr index nor KTR ratio were associated with changes in systolic or diastolic BP over the prior 6 years (all p > 0.05).

Table 3.

Association of changes in systolic and diastolic BP over the prior 6 years with levels of circulating markers of inflammation in 46–49 years old women and men: the Hordaland Health Study.

Women Men Interaction biomarker and sex
Variable Univariable Model 1 Model 2 Univariable Model 1 Model 2 Univariable Model 1 Model 2
β p β p β p β p β p β p p p p
Δ systolic BP
    hs-CRP 0.102 <0.01 0.067 <0.01 0.072 <0.01 0.016 0.54 −0.005 0.87 0.015 0.66 0.01 0.047 0.10
    Neopterin 0.023 0.32 0.024 0.30 0.018 0.40 −0.012 0.64 −0.011 0.66 0.008 0.75 0.32 0.32 0.27
    KTR −0.006 0.81 −0.026 0.27 −0.037 0.11 −0.039 0.14 −0.044 0.093 −0.043 0.09 0.38 0.64 0.73
    PAR index 0.012 0.60 0.015 0.53 0.011 0.63 0.024 0.36 0.026 0.33 0.047 0.05 0.76 0.76 0.37
Δ diastolic BP
    hs-CRP 0.054 0.02 0.058 0.02 0.079 <0.01 −0.023 0.38 −0.029 0.28 0.006 0.80 0.03 0.03 0.09
    Neopterin 0.065 <0.01 0.065 <0.01 0.074 <0.01 0.026 0.33 0.026 0.32 0.022 0.37 0.02 0.30 0.08
    KTR 0.006 0.81 0.004 0.88 0.005 0.83 0.001 0.98 −0.0004 0.99 0.008 0.74 0.89 0.93 0.81
    PAR index 0.014 0.54 0.014 0.54 0.027 0.22 0.039 0.14 0.039 0.14 0.072 <0.01 0.45 0.45 0.31

Model 1 is adjusted for body mass index. Model 2 is adjusted for body mass index, serum creatinine, physical activity, daily smoking, diabetes, and non-fasting serum triglycerides. In addition model 2 is adjusted systolic or diastolic BP at baseline in the models on change in systolic and diastolic BP, respectively.

β standardized B coefficient, BP blood pressure, hs-CRP high-sensitive C-reactive protein, PAr index ratio: 4-pyridoxic acid/(pyridoxal 5’-phosphate + pyridoxal), KTR kynurenin:tryptophan ratio.

Significant associations are printed in bold.

Men

Univariable results are presented in Table 3. In contrast to findings in women, hs-CRP was not associated with increases in systolic (β = 0.02) or diastolic (β = 0.006) BP over the prior 6 years in men (p > 0.05) (Table 3, model 2). Neopterin was also not associated with prior increases in systolic (β = 0.008) or diastolic (β = 0.02) BP. Higher PAr index was associated with a larger increase in diastolic BP (β = 0.07) (p < 0.05) over the prior 6 years, while KTR was not associated with change in systolic or diastolic BP (p > 0.05) (Table 3).

A significant sex-interaction with hs-CRP was found in univariable analyses for changes in systolic and diastolic BP (both p < 0.05).

Associations of new onset hypertension with circulating markers of inflammation in women and men

Among 1155 women and 526 men who were normotensive and free from antihypertensive medication at baseline, 17% of women and 30% of men developed new-onset hypertension during 6 years follow-up (p < 0.01). Only 7% of women and 5% of men with new onset hypertension at follow-up were taking antihypertensive medication (p = 0.37). Among participants not taking antihypertensive medication, 12% of women and 23% of men had stage 1 hypertension (BP 130–139/80–89 mmHg) (p < 0.01), and 5% of women and 6% of men had stage 2 hypertension (BP ≥ 140/90 mmHg) (p = 0.32).

Among women, new-onset hypertension was associated with higher plasma hs-CRP (OR 1.18 95% CI 1.04–1.34) (Model 2, Table 4). Both women with hs-CRP 1–<3 mg/l (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.20–2.53) and hs-CRP ≥ 3 mg/l (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.20–2.90) had an increased risk of new-onset hypertension compared to women having hs-CRP < 1 mg/l (Model 2, Table 4). Neopterin, KTR or the PAr index were not associated with new onset hypertension in women (all p > 0.05). Among men, neither hs-CRP, neopterin, KTR nor the PAr index were associated with new onset hypertension (all p > 0.05) (Table 4). A significant interaction between hs-CRP and sex was found in models on incident hypertension, confirming a sex-specific association between hs-CRP and hypertension (all p < 0.05).

Table 4.

Association of new onset hypertension with levels of circulating markers of inflammation in 46–49 years old women and men: the Hordaland Health Study.

Women n = 1155 Men n = 526 Interaction biomarker and sex
Variable Univariable Model 2 Univariable Model 2 Univariable Model 2
OR 95% CI p OR 95% CI p OR 95% CI p OR 95% CI p p p
hs-CRPa 1.34 (1.20–1.50) <0.01 1.18 (1.04–1.34) <0.01 1.04 (0.91–1.18) <0.61 0.97 (0.84–1.12) 0.71 <0.01 0.046
hs-CRP
    <1 mg/l Ref Ref Ref Ref <0.01 0.04
    1–<3 mg/l 2.02 (1.41–2.90) <0.01 1.74 (1.20–2.53) <0.01 1.40 (0.93–2.14) 0.11 1.22 (0.79–1.90) 0.37
    ≥3 mg/l 2.91 (1.98–4.29) <0.01 1.87 (1.20–2.90) <0.01 1.08 (0.65–1.79) 0.78 0.87 (0.49–1.53) 0.62
Neopterina 1.06 (0.61–1.84) 0.83 1.02 (0.58–1.81) 0.97 0.90 (0.45–1.82) 0.77 0.83 (0.39–1.74) 0.85 0.71 0.69
KTRa 1.92 (0.85–4.32) 0.11 1.11 (0.46–2.67) 0.82 0.90 (0.32–2.49) 0.83 0.71 (0.24–2.09) 0.53 0.25 0.59
PAr indexa 1.34 (0.93–1.93) 0.11 1.31 (0.90–1.90) 0.16 0.99 (0.60–1.63) 0.97 1.00 (0.59–1.68) 0.99 0.34 0.43

Model 2 is adjusted for body mass index, creatinine, physical activity, daily smoking, diabetes, and non-fasting serum triglycerides. For this analysis participants with hypertension at baseline were excluded.Hypertension BP ≥ 130/80 mmHg or use of antihypertensive medication, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, hs-CRP high-sensitive C-reactive protein, PAr index ratio: 4-pyridoxic acid/(pyridoxal 5’-phosphate + pyridoxal), KTR kynurenin:tryptophan ratio.

aOR per 1 unit increase on log-transformed scale for each inflammation marker.

Significant associations are printed in bold.

Associations of antihypertensive medication with circulating markers of inflammation

In univariable analyses in women, use of antihypertensive medication was associated with higher levels of hs-CRP, neopterin and KTR (all p < 0.05) (data not shown). In adjusted analysis, antihypertensive medication was only associated with higher levels of neopterin in women (p < 0.05) (data not shown). In univariable analyses in men, antihypertensive medication was associated with higher levels of hs-CRP (p < 0.05) (data not shown). After multivariable adjustments, antihypertensive medication was not associated with circulating markers of inflammation in men (all p > 0.05) (data not shown). We did not have power to look at individual antihypertensive medications.

Subgroup analyses among participants with an increase in BP during follow-up

Over 6 years follow-up, 54% of women and 44% of men had an increase >0 mmHg in systolic BP. Our main results remained significant among participants with an increase in systolic BP during follow-up; higher levels of hs-CPR remained significantly associated with higher systolic and diastolic BP and increases in systolic and diastolic BP in women (all p < 0.05) and was still not associated with BP or increases in systolic or diastolic BP in men (all p > 0.05) (data not shown). Likewise, higher levels of neopterin remained associated with higher levels of diastolic BP and increase in diastolic BP in women (both p < 0.05) and was still not associated with diastolic BP or increase in diastolic BP in men (both p > 0.05). In contrast, in this subgroup, higher levels of PAr were associated with higher systolic and diastolic BP and increases in systolic and diastolic BP in women (all p < 0.05) but was not associated with BP or increase in BP among men (all p > 0.05) (data not shown).

Only 30% of women and 40% of men had an increase >0 mmHg in diastolic BP during follow-up. No significant associations between the circulating markers of inflammation and diastolic BP or increase in diastolic BP was found in this subset in either sex (all p > 0.05) (data not shown).

Sensitivity analysis

In sensitivity analysis excluding participants with previous myocardial infarction or stroke and participants taking antihypertensive medication, the associations between hs-CRP and neopterin with BP, BP change and new-onset hypertension did not change significantly. The sex-neopterin interaction in the multivariable model for diastolic BP was attenuated p = 0.07, while there was a significant sex-hs-CPR interaction in the multivariable model on change in diastolic BP.

Discussion

The present study adds novel information on sex-specific associations between prognostically validated markers of inflammation and BP in early midlife. Among women, higher hs-CRP levels were independently associated with higher BP, larger 6-year BP increase and new-onset hypertension in early midlife. Likewise, higher neopterin, a marker of T cell activation, was associated with both higher diastolic BP and higher 6-year increase in diastolic BP in women. In contrast, a higher PAr index was associated with higher diastolic BP in women and with both higher systolic and diastolic BP in men.

The role of inflammation in BP development has been reported in experimental studies [5, 22]. Common hypertensive stimuli like angiotensin II and high dietary salt intake activate pro-inflammatory T cells which infiltrate the arterial wall and promote peripheral arterial dysfunction, resulting in increased vascular resistance which contributes to BP elevation [22, 23]. However, there is a paucity of clinical studies of this topic, in particular of studies using a sex-specific approach. Although healthy young women have lower average systolic and diastolic BP than their male counterparts [24], women have a steeper increase in BP than men with aging, starting already in the third decade [2]. In the current study, women experienced an increase in systolic BP, whereas men had decreasing levels of both systolic and diastolic BP over 6 years in their forties. Our study expands earlier findings by demonstrating that circulating markers of inflammation are associated with BP and BP change in early midlife in a sex-specific manner. Taken together these results suggests a sex specific interaction between inflammation, vascular injury, and BP increase.

Chronic low grade cardiovascular inflammation is a hallmark of obesity [25]. Obesity is a common co-morbidity in hypertension, particularly in women [26]. It is therefore of special interest that the associations of higher hs-CRP with BP-increase and new onset hypertension in early midlife were independent of BMI and only found in women in the present study. These results add to knowledge from previous studies [27, 28]. In the Women’s Health Study, higher levels of CRP was associated with incident hypertension in 20,525 women aged 45 years or older [27]. However, in the Physician’s Health Study performed in men only, CRP was not associated with a higher risk of hypertension among individuals age 40–84 years [28]. Taken together these findings are in line with results from the present study, where the association between hs-CRP and systolic and diastolic BP in men was explained by higher BMI. In contrast, the association between hs-CRP and systolic and diastolic BP was independent of BMI in women.

Higher plasma neopterin was associated with higher diastolic BP, and increase in diastolic BP in women only, suggesting that T-cell-mediated inflammation may be involved in diastolic BP increase in middle-aged women. Increased level of plasma neopterin has been associated with vascular dysfunction and atherosclerosis [29]. In a small study by Zhang et al. in 24 middle-aged subjects with hypertension, higher neopterin was associated with endothelial dysfunction and higher arterial stiffness [29]. Furthermore, in 121 patients with diabetes type 2, higher circulating level of neopterin was associated with higher prevalence of carotid plaques [30]. In the Hordaland Health study, we recently demonstrated a strong association between stage 1 diastolic hypertension in early midlife and risk of acute coronary syndromes during 16 years follow-up in women [3]. In line with this, in the UK biobank study, isolated diastolic hypertension was associated with increased risk of myocardial infarction and CVD death in women, but not in men [31]. Taken together, these results indicate that vascular inflammation may contribute to increased risk for acute coronary events through diastolic BP elevation in young and middle aged women [3].

Systemic inflammation leads to altered metabolism of vitamin B6 [10]. The newly developed PAr index reflects impaired vitamin B6 metabolism and is both a marker of acute phase reaction and cellular inflammation [10]. This marker has been associated with increased risk of stroke and all-cause mortality in community based cohorts [11, 14, 32]. The present study adds to this by demonstrating that among subjects experiencing an increase in systolic BP during follow-up, higher levels of PAr were associated with higher systolic and diastolic BP in women. In the total study population, the PAr index was positively associated with systolic and diastolic BP in men, and with diastolic BP in women.

Limitations and strengths

Our study has some important limitations. Sex hormones influence BP development and regulation through a number of mechanisms. In midlife, women experience a transition in female sex hormones. Sex hormones were not measured in our study cohort. However, the average age was 42 years at baseline, 10 years less than the average menopausal age in Norwegian women. Furthermore, inflammatory markers were only measured at the end of the 6 years follow-up. Thus, the prospective associations between circulating levels of inflammatory markers and BP development could not be tested. The strengths of the study include the wide selection of inflammatory markers, the relatively large and unselected community-based study population and the sex-specific analysis approach.

Conclusion

In the Hordaland Health study, higher levels of circulating markers of inflammation, including hs-CRP, neopterin and the PAr index, were associated with higher BP, BP change and new onset hypertension in a sex-specific manner. After adjustment for BMI, higher hs-CRP was associated with higher BP and new onset hypertension only in women. Neopterin was associated with diastolic BP in women, while PAr was associated with BP in women and men. Our results suggest that there is a sex-specific interaction between vascular inflammation and BP in midlife.

Summary table

What is known about the topic

  • Age-associated blood pressure (BP) development differs between women and men. Among young adults, women have lower BP than men. Then, starting from the 3rd decade, women have a steeper increase in BP than men.

  • BP is a stronger risk factor for coronary heart disease in women than men, and this risk initiates at a lower BP level in women than men.

  • Inflammation is associated with higher risk of hypertension.

What this study adds

  • Among 48-year-old participants in the Hordaland Health study, higher levels of circulating markers of inflammation were associated with higher BP and new-onset hypertension in a sex-specific manner.

  • Higher levels of plasma hs-CRP and neopterin were associated with new onset hypertension and higher BP only in women. Our results suggest a sex-specific interaction between BP and vascular inflammation in midlife.

Author contributions

EK, GST, HM, EG, AU and PMU contributed to the conception or design of the work. EK, GST, HM, JI, TRH and EG contributed to the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work. EK drafted the manuscript. All authors critically revised and gave final approval to the manuscript.

Funding

The study was funded by the University of Bergen.

Data availability

The dataset used in this study contains potentially sensitive information. The Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics does not allow for public deposition of the data. Application for access to the data can be done on the HUSK website: https://husk-en.w.uib.no/how-to-apply-for-data-access/.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.GBD 2019 Risk Factors Collaborators. Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396:1223–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 2.Ji H, Kim A, Ebinger JE, Niiranen TJ, Claggett BL, Bairey Merz CN, et al. Sex differences in blood pressure trajectories over the life course. JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5:19–26. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.5306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kringeland E, Tell GS, Midtbø H, Igland J, Haugsgjerd TR, Gerdts E. Stage 1 hypertension, sex, and acute coronary syndromes during midlife: the Hordaland Health Study. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2022;29:147–54. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwab068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sylvester MA, Brooks HL. Sex-specific mechanisms in inflammation and hypertension. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2019;21:53. doi: 10.1007/s11906-019-0959-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mikolajczyk TP, Guzik TJ. Adaptive immunity in hypertension. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2019;2:68. doi: 10.1007/s11906-019-0971-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Huber C, Batchelor JR, Fuchs D, Hausen A, Lang A, Niederwieser D, et al. Immune response-associated production of neopterin. Release from macrophages primarily under control of interferon-gamma. J Exp Med. 1984;160:310–6. doi: 10.1084/jem.160.1.310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Taylor MW, Feng G. Relationship between interferon‐γ, indoleamine 2,3‐dioxygenase, and tryptophan catabolism. FASEB J. 1991;5:2516–22. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.5.11.1907934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Schröcksnadel K, Wirleitner B, Winkler C, Fuchs D. Monitoring tryptophan metabolism in chronic immune activation. Clin Chim Acta. 2006;364:82–90. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2005.06.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Miller M, Zhan M, Havas S. High attributable risk of elevated C-reactive protein level to conventional coronary heart disease risk factors: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:2063–8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.18.2063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ulvik A, Midttun Ø, Pedersen ER, Eussen SJPM, Nygård O, Ueland PM. Evidence for increased catabolism of vitamin B-6 during systemic inflammation. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;100:250–5. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.114.083196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zuo H, Tell GS, Ueland PM, Nygard O, Vollset SE, Midttun O, et al. The PAr index, an indicator reflecting altered Vitamin B-6 homeostasis, is associated with long-term risk of stroke in the general population: the Hordaland Health Study (HUSK) Am J Clin Nutr. 2018;107:105–12. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqx012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sulo G, Vollset SE, Nygard O, Midttun O, Ueland PM, Eussen SJPM, et al. Neopterin and kynurenine-tryptophan ratio as predictors of coronary events in older adults, the Hordaland Health Study. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168:1435–40. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.12.090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ueland M, Ulvik A, Rios-Avila L, Midttun Ø, Gregory JF. Direct and functional biomarkers of vitamin B6 status. Annu Rev Nutr. 2015;35:33–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 14.Ulvik A, Pedersen ER, Svingen GFT, McCann A, Midttun Ø, Nygård O, et al. Vitamin B-6 catabolism and long-term mortality risk in patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016;103:1417–25. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.115.126342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Blake GJ, Rifai N, Buring JE, Ridker PM. Blood pressure, C-reactive protein, and risk of future cardiovascular events. Circulation. 2003;108:2993–9. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000104566.10178.AF. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zuo H, Ueland PM, Ulvik A, Eussen SJPM, Vollset SE, Nygård O, et al. Plasma biomarkers of inflammation, the kynurenine pathway, and risks of all-cause, cancer, and cardiovascular disease mortality: the Hordaland Health Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2016;183:249–58. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwv242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Refsum H, Nurk E, Smith AD, Ueland PM, Gjesdal CG, Bjelland I, et al. The Hordaland Homocysteine Study: a community-based study of homocysteine, its determinants, and associations with disease. J Nutr. 2006;136:1731S–40S. doi: 10.1093/jn/136.6.1731S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, Casey DE, Collins KJ, Dennison Himmelfarb C, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Hypertension. 2018;71:1269–324. e139. doi: 10.1161/HYP.0000000000000066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jarvis MJ, Tunstall-Pedoe H, Feyerabend C, Vesey C, Saloojee Y. Comparison of tests used to distinguish smokers from nonsmokers. Am J Public Health. 1987;77:1435. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.77.11.1435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Midttun O, Hustad S, Ueland PM. Quantitative profiling of biomarkers related to B-vitamin status, tryptophan metabolism and inflammation in human plasma by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2009;23:1371–9. doi: 10.1002/rcm.4013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gao J, Meyer K, Borucki K, Ueland PM. Multiplex immuno-MALDI-TOF MS for targeted quantification of protein biomarkers and their proteoforms related to inflammation and renal dysfunction. Anal Chem. 2018;90:3366–73. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b04975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Guzik TJ, Hoch NE, Brown KA, McCann LA, Rahman A, Dikalov S, et al. Role of the T cell in the genesis of angiotensin II-induced hypertension and vascular dysfunction. J Exp Med. 2007;204:2449–60. doi: 10.1084/jem.20070657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rizzoni D, De Ciuceis C, Szczepaniak P, Paradis P, Schiffrin EL, Guzik TJ. Immune system and microvascular remodeling in humans. Hypertension. 2022;79:691–705. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.121.17955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kringeland E, Tell GS, Midtbø H, Haugsgjerd TR, Igland J, Gerdts E. Factors associated with increase in blood pressure and incident hypertension in early midlife: the Hordaland Health Study. Blood Press. 2020;29:267–75. doi: 10.1080/08037051.2020.1762070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hall JE, Mouton AJ, Da Silva AA, Omoto ACM, Wang Z, Li X, et al. Obesity, kidney dysfunction, and inflammation: interactions in hypertension. Cardiovasc Res. 2021;117:1859–76. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvaa336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sharabi Y, Grotto I, Huerta M, Grossman E. Susceptibility of the influence of weight on blood pressure in men versus women: lessons from a large-scale study of young adults. Am J Hypertens. 2004;17:404–8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2003.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sesso HD, Buring JE, Rifai N, Blake GJ, Gaziano JM, Ridker PM. C-Reactive protein and the risk of developing hypertension. JAMA. 2003;290:2945–51. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.22.2945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sesso HD, Jiméenez MC, Wang L, Ridker PM, Buring JE, Michael Gaziano J. Plasma inflammatory markers and the risk of developing hypertension in men. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015;4:1–9. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.001802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zhang Y-Y, Tong X-Z, Xia W-H, Xie W-L, Yu B-B, Zhang B, et al. Increased plasma neopterin levels are associated with reduced endothelial function and arterial elasticity in hypertension. J Hum Hypertens. 2016;30:436–41. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2015.72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wan RH, Yuan Y, Hao W, Zheng LY, Lu J. Relationship between serum neopterin level and peripheral arterial plaque in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2021;14:2871–8. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S315986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Li FR, He Y, Yang HL, Liu HM, Zhou R, Chen GC, et al. Isolated systolic and diastolic hypertension by the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines and risk of cardiovascular disease: a large prospective cohort study. J Hypertens. 2021;39:1594–601. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Dugué P-A, Hodge AM, Ulvik A, Ueland PM, Midttun Ø, Rinaldi S, et al. Association of markers of inflammation, the kynurenine pathway and B vitamins with age and mortality, and a signature of inflammaging. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2022;77:826–36. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glab163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The dataset used in this study contains potentially sensitive information. The Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics does not allow for public deposition of the data. Application for access to the data can be done on the HUSK website: https://husk-en.w.uib.no/how-to-apply-for-data-access/.


Articles from Journal of Human Hypertension are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES