Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2023 Mar 23;260(5):1339–1347. doi: 10.1007/s00709-023-01853-7

Ultrastructural changes during nectar secretion from extrafloral nectaries of Pithecellobium dulce Benth

Pramod Sivan 1,, Karumanchi S Rao 2
PMCID: PMC10403400  PMID: 36949343

Abstract

The structural changes in the secretory cells are important to understand the ontogeny and nectar secretion process from the nectaries. In this study, we investigated the ultrastructural changes during different developmental/secretion stages of extrafloral nectaries (EFNs) of Pithecellobium dulce. The dense cytoplasm with active biosynthesis mechanisms such as ribosomes, mitochondria, large nucleus, and plastids with accumulated starch grains characterized the pre-secretion stage of young nectariferous cells. During the secretory phase, the cytoplasm showed distinct changes associated with endomembrane transport such as the predominant occurrence of Golgi, secretory vesicles, and ER resulting in the subsequent appearance of secretions in the intercellular and subcuticular spaces. Cell wall loosening following the dissolution of middle lamellae leading to the formation of subcuticular spaces was evident during advanced stages of nectar secretion. The characteristic cytoplasmic and apoplastic changes associated with cell death were noticed during the post-secretory stages. The structural evidence from the present study suggests the occurrence of two modes of secretion (merocrine and holocrine) during the early and late stages of secretion in the EFNs of P. dulce.

Keywords: Extrafloral nectaries, Ultrastructure, Developmental changes, Nectar secretion

Introduction

The specialized structures found on the plant surface for the secretion of sugar, water, and amino acids are called nectaries (Nicolson and Thornburg 2007; Coutinho et al. 2012). According to the topography, the nectaries associated with floral parts are referred to as floral nectaries, while the glands associated with vegetative portions of plants and which secretes primarily sugars are called extrafloral nectaries (EFNs) (Durkee 1982; Coutinho et al. 2012). EFNs proved to have importance in taxonomic studies and the establishment of phylogenetic relationships within taxonomic groups (Marazzi et al. 2019, Dalvi et al. 2013, 2020; Souza et al. 2021; Coutinho et al., 2022). Furthermore, the chemical nature of the secretion of EFNs has been considered to be an ecologically significant indicator for understanding the relationship between visiting ants and plants (Coutinho et al. 2022). The functional significance of the ontogeny of EFNs is attributed to the support of the mutualists of plants such as ants in Acacia drepanolobium (Young et al. 1997) and Opuntia imbricata (Miller 2007). The ontogenetic pattern of EFNs has been mostly explained in terms of resource limitation for young plants to produce such traits (Izzo and Vasconcelos 2005; Miller 2007) or due to the architectural constraints associated with the ability of a plant to attract a whole colony of ants (Boege et al. 2007). The occurrence EFNs as complex structures is a characteristic feature of Mimosaceae and is believed to function in attracting aggressive insects such as ants which disturb the herbivores and reduce the damage to plants (Dave and Menon 1987). Previous studies have proposed two methods of nectar secretion based on the cytology of secretory cells; the transport of individual sugar molecules across the secretory cell membrane is called eccrine secretion, whereas the second mode is termed as granulocrine secretion which involves the transport of sugar through vesicles, presumably derived from ER or dictyosomes to the plasmalemma where the fusion of these elements occurs followed by the release of sugar exterior of the nectaries (Fahn and Banouaiche 1979); Durkee 1982).

Due to the attractive role in reproduction, floral nectaries have been studied extensively, while developmental studies of EFNs have received relatively little attention (Delgado et al. 2011; Villamil et al. 2013). The complex biology of EFNs development and their functional importance in various plants have been studied through analysis of various aspects such as emergence, differentiation, senescence, changes in cytoplasm and nuclei density, chemical nature of nectar, the axis of mitotic divisions, and physiological and anatomical constraints limiting EFNs development (Durkee 1982; Thadeo et al. 2008; Villamil et al. 2013). The EFNs mediating ant-plant protection mutualisms are reported to be quite common and unusually diverse in the Leguminosae (Marazzi et al. 2019). Morphological and anatomical characteristics are key indicators of the taxonomic importance of EFNs during plant evolution. For instance, the flat glandular type of EFNs with sap connectivity closer to the phloem of nearby vascular strand are considered to be primitive, while the development of phloem traces into the more definitive glandular structure results in the increase of distance between secretory tissues and vascular strands (Elias 1972). In a recent review on phylogenetic reconstruction of EFNs in leguminosae suggests occurence of diverse EFN types within different genera might have independent evolutionary trajectories (Marazzi et al. 2019). Among different Leguminosae members, Caesalpinioideae group representing maximum morphological diversification is almost exclusively with elevated EFNs, Detarioideae members with flat EFNs, Papilionoideae with swollen scar, and intrastipular EFNs is predominant in Cercidoideae (Marazzi et al. 2019). The genera Pithecellobium belongs to Caesalpinioideae. However, the complexity of the nectar secretion process is further increased by the different types of cellular processes, i.e., holocrine (the entire cell disintegrates to release its substances ) and merocrine (glands remain alive and secrete their substances by exocytosis). The majority of recent studies on the EFNs in plants are mainly dealt with their morphology, anatomy, and ecological significance; however, the lacunae of ultrastructural studies hinder our knowledge on the complex biology of the cellular mechanism of nectar secretion in EFNs. This aspect is very critical in unraveling the science behind nectar secretion from EFNs of various species. The genus Pithecellobium (Caesalpinioideae) is a large assemblage of tropical and subtropical trees and shrubs. The occurrence of EFNs has been reported in a few species of Pithecellobium. Pithecellobium dulce is an evergreen medium-sized, spiny tree having vast nutritional and pharmacognosy value for its various parts such as leaves, bark, fruits, and seeds (Kulkarni and Jamakhandi 2018; Murugesan et al. 2019). Although the morphological and anatomical studies in Pithecellobium demonstrated the presence of advanced type of EFNs in P. macradenium (Elias 1972) and in P. dulce (Dave and Menon 1987), but how these phylogenetic advancements are reflected in the EFNs developments, especially the type of glandular secretion in Pithecellobium dulce, remain unknown. This information is important to understand the developmental biology of taxonomically advanced type of EFNs in Pithecellobium which might have a contributory role in its efficiency in ant-plant mutualism process. Considering the necessity of deciphering the mechanism of nectar secretion, the present study was undertaken to elucidate the ultrastructural changes which occur prior to, during, and post-secretion stages of nectariferous cells in the EFNs of Pithecellobium dulce.

Materials and methods

Plant material

EFNs of various ages were collected from the rachis of P. dulce Benth, growing in the Botanical garden of Sardar Patel University, Gujarat, India. The young nectaries were located on leaves close to the shoot tips, and the mature ones with a tiny droplet of nectar indicating an active secretion stage were located on leaves closer to young leaves. The old and partially dried nectaries without nectar droplets were found on mature leaves away from the shoot tip.

Sample preparation for microscopy

Samples were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH 7.2) for 2 days. They were then post-fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide for overnight, dehydrated in graded acetone series, and embedded in Spurr’s epoxy resin (Spurr 1969).

Light microscopy

One-micrometer-thick longitudinal sections of the nectaries taken from resin embedded samples were stained with calcofluor white ST (0.1% in distilled water, American Cyanamid Company, Wayne, NY) and observed under a Zeiss fluorescence microscope.

Transmission electron microscopy

Ultrathin sections were cut on an ultramicrotome (Reichert OM U3, Austria), stained with a saturated solution of uranyl acetate in 50% ethanol for 30 min and in Reynold’s lead citrate for 5 min. Stained sections were examined with a Philips 300 transmission electron microscope.

Scanning electron microscopy

Samples were dehydrated in ethanol-isoamyl alcohol series, critical-point dried using liquid CO2, coated with gold using a sputter coating unit, and observed in a Philips SEM 505 at 10 kv.

Results

Structure of nectary

The small copular (urn-shaped) nectaries in P. dulce are generally sessile to sub-sessile with conspicuous rims and cup cavities (Fig. 1a–d). Stomata with guard cells were observed on the lateral surface of the nectary wall (Fig 1b). The dried remains of drops of sticky nectar were noticed in the active nectary cavity (Fig. 1c). The ruptured cuticle was evident on the cup region during secretion stage (Fig. 1c). The mature nectary at post-secretion stage showed the presence of fungal mycelia on the cuticle surface (Fig. 1d). Nectaries are located on the primary rachis between the insertions of each pair of the leaflet. A thick cuticle layer was found on the tangential wall of epidermal cells. Beneath the several layered nectariferous cells zone, vascular traces originated from the petiolar vascular bundles girdle was observed (Fig. 1e). The phloem traces reaches the nectariferous tissue at the tip of the nectary. During the late stages of secretion, the nectariferous cells showed thick wall with intense fluorescence after calcofluor staining indicating apoplastic secretion (Fig. 1f, g). The glandular region of the nectary consists of highly vacuolated cells (Fig. 1g).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Scanning electron microscopy (ad) and fluorescence microscopy (eg) images showing surface morphology and internal anatomy of EFNs. a The urn shaped nectary at pre-secretory stage. b The lateral surface of stalk region showing presence of stomata. c The concave surface of mature nectary showing dried nectar oozed out of ruptured cuticle of epidermal cells. d The mature nectary after secretion showing the presence of fungal hyphae on the surface. e Longitudinally cut nectary showing vascular strand extending from the base to the nectariferous tissue. f Secretory tissue in old nectary showing the presence of parenchymatous and sclerenchymatous zones. g Enlarged view of F showing sclerenchymatous nectariferous zones. Scale bar: a, cg = 50 μm, b = 20 μm

Ultrastructure of nectary

The ultrastructural changes during different developmental stages (pre-secretory, secretory, late secretory, and post-secretory stages) of nectariferous cells in P. dulce were observed using transmission electron microscopy.

Pre-secretory stage

The epidermal and subepidermal nectariferous cells were characterized by dense cytoplasm containing large nuclei, sometimes with more than one nucleolus (Fig. 2a–c) and the presence of long narrow profiles of rough ER cisternae in the periphery of cytoplasm (Fig. 2b, c). Dictyosome in small groups and numerous mitochondria were noticed in these cells (Fig. 2b). Plastids showed the presence of starch grains and plastoglobuli (Fig. 2b). Vacuoles containing electron-dense osmophilic droplets were apparent in the cytoplasm of young nectariferous cells (Fig. 1b, c). The cell walls are irregularly thickened (Fig. 2b, d). The cytoplasmic connection is maintained in the non-thickened areas of the cell wall by plasmodesmata, ER, and RER (Fig. 2c).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

ah TEM images of extrafloral nectariferous cells showing ultrastructural changes during the pre-secretory stage. a The epidermal and subepidermal nectariferous cells showing dense cytoplasm. b The nectariferous cells showing dense cytoplasm containing a large nucleus (N), mitochondria (M), plastid with starch grains (S), and large vacuoles (V) with electron-dense osmophilic bodies. c An enlarged view of “b” showing the presence of Golgi bodies (G) and rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER) near the cell wall plasmodesmata region. Arrow indicates the vesicles fused with the plasma membrane. d The cell corners showing loosening of middle lamellae prior to nectar secretion. Note the nucleus (N) with nucleolus (Nu) and plastids (P) with plastoglobuli. e The cell wall between two adjacent nectariferous cells showing loosening of middle lamellae (arrows). f Formation of large intercellular space (arrow) through loosening of middle lamellae. M mitochondria, P plastid, V vacuole. g Wide intercellular gap areas formed through the merging of middle lamellae loosened spaces. h Fusiform to oval-shaped plastids (P) showing thylakoids and plastoglobuli. Note the presence of rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER) near the plasmodesmata (Pd) and round to oval-shaped mitochondria (M). Scale bar: a =10 μm, b–g = 2 μm

Secretory stage

The cell wall underwent drastic ultrastructural changes during this stage. Loosening of cellulose microfibrils followed by separation of middle lamellae resulted in the appearance of intercellular spaces and subcuticular spaces (Fig. 2e, f, g). The accumulation of nectar lead to further expansion of these spaces, giving the appearance of wide gap areas between cells (Fig. 2g). The plastids appeared darkly stained, fusiform to oval-shaped containing well-developed thylakoids and many plastoglobuli (Fig. 2h). Many of the vacuoles showed the presence of granular materials and osmophilic materials (Fig. 2h). The RER cisternae were unevenly dilated in the form of small rows and are often closely associated with plasmodesmata (Fig. 2h). The intercellular spaces showed the presence of granular and fibrillar secretions (Fig. 2h). An increase in the number of mitochondria with well-developed cristae was apparent during this stage (Fig. 3a). Association of rough ER, smooth ER (tubular), and secretory vesicles near the plasmalemma was noticed (Fig. 3b). Interestingly, the adjacent loosely organized cell wall area without plasmodesmata showed abundant accumulation of fibrillar secretions in the subcuticular spaces (Fig. 3b). The examination of loosely organized cell wall also revealed the presence of granular substances in the spaces between microfibrils (Fig. 3c). Vesicular structures were also noticed in space between plasmalemma and cell wall (Fig. 3d). Nucleus appeared smaller in size, while large vacuoles containing electron dense osmiophilic substances were noticed in the cytoplasm of subepidermal cells (Fig. 3e). Disappearance of starch from plastids was a conspicuous feature of nectariferous cells during the secretory stages (Fig. 3e). The sieve plate region of sieve cells connecting rachis to nectariferous cells showed the presence of callose in the sieve pore region (Fig. 3f).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

af TEM images of nectariferous cells showing ultrastructural changes during the secretory stage. a Nectariferous cells during the secretory stage showing the presence of numerous mitochondria (M) and rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER) near the cell wall. b Association of rough endoplasmic reticulum, smooth endoplasmic reticulum, and vesicles near the cell wall. Arrow indicates vesicles fused with the plasma membrane. c The loosely organized cell wall showing the presence of granular substances between microfibrils. d Presence of vesicular structures (arrows) in the space between the plasmalemma and cell wall. e Cells during the secretion stage showing a small-sized nucleus, rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER), and large vacuoles (V) containing osmiophilic substances. Note the absence of starch grains in plastids (P). f A sieve tube from phloem strand of nectary showing sieve plate with sieve pores and callose (arrows). Scale bar: ad = 0.5 μm, ef = 1 μm

Late secretory stage

This stage is characterized by the disintegration of nectariferous cells which occurs progressively towards the vascular bundle. Cell disintegration starts with the degradation of the cell wall (Fig. 4a). The adjacent cell below the degraded cell wall showed very dark cytoplasm (Fig. 4a). Cells often showed the presence of large vacuoles which occupies the majority of cell volume (Fig. 4a). Many of the vacuoles were free of osmiophilic substances, while few showed the presence of granular materials. Rough ER was stalked in layers, and ER cisternae were long and convoluted (Fig. 4b).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

af TEM images of nectariferous cells showing ultrastructural changes during the late-secretory (ab) and post-secretory stage (cf). a Nectariferous cells showing degradation of the cell walls (arrows). Note the presence of large vacuoles. b A cell showing stalked rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER). Note the long and convoluted shape of ER cisternae. c Cells in the late secretory stage showing the presence of autophagous vacuoles (V) containing partially degraded cell organelles. d A disorganized plastid (P) showing a few membranes of thylakoids and plastoglobuli. e, f Disorganized nectariferous cells (e) with intercellular spaces (f) filled with cytoplasmic debris. Scale bar: a = 10 μm, bf = 2 μm

Post-secretion stage

Extensive degradation of plastids, nuclei, and mitochondria was evident. Autophagous vacuoles containing partially degraded cell organelles were often noticed in the cytoplasm (Fig. 4d). Increase in vacuolar volume through the fusion of small vacuoles following more cell sap production was observed (Fig. 4c). The thylakoid structures of plastids were disorganized, while the presence of plastoglobuli was apparent even in the plastid lumen (Fig. 4d). The cytoplasmic contents released after cell wall degradation moved to intercellular and subcuticular spaces where it appeared as granular and floccular secretions (Fig. 4e, f).

Discussion

The extrafloral nectary of P. dulce is an urn-like structure with a concave surface lined by epidermal cells. When the nectary is active, a drop of transparent and sticky nectar oozes out from the pit, and the dried nectar gives a brownish appearance to the mature nectary (Dave and Menon 1987). Similar type of cupular EFNs have been reported in P. macradenium and in closely related genus Inga which correlates with advanced nature of pollinia or polyads, and these specialized and unspecialized nature of foliar nectaries helps to determine the phylogenetic advancement of genera within mimosoid legumes (Elias, 1972). Elevated type of EFNs is found in 85 genera of legumes in which 81 belongs to Caesalpinioideae (Marazzi et al. 2019). The general histology of nectary in P. dulce is characterized by a single-layered epidermis with cuticle, nectariferous zone composed of outer parenchymatous and inner sclerenchymatous cells followed by highly vacuolated glandular cells. These anatomical characteristics in P. macradenium were described as indicators of foliar nectaries as highly specialized organs (Elias, 1972). The typical structural EFNs are characterized by the presence of parenchymatous nectariferous tissue composed of densely packed, thin-walled cells with dense cytoplasm and a glandular epidermal tissue through which exudation of nectar occurs (Marazzi et al. 2019). Single-layered non-secretory epidermal cells are characteristic features of EFNs from other reported species of the Leguminosae family (Pascal et al. 2000; Coutinho et al. 2012) and could be a taxonomic character for this family (Coutinho et al. 2022). Multilayered nectariferous parenchyma surrounded by a few layers of highly vacuolated cells where vascular tissues end is a common feature reported in the EFNs of Leguminosae (Durkee et al. 1999; Melo et al. 2010; Marazzi et al. 2013; Coutinho et al. 2022). The presence of two abaxial veins on either side of nectariferous cells making a continuous rim throughout the secondary rachis constitutes the vascular connection between EFNs and petiole in P. dulce. The vasculature in EFNs of P. dulce reported to be typical in its mode of branching pattern facilitating phloem connectivity for sugar supply to the secretary tissue at the tip of the nectary (Dave and Menon 1987). This type of vasculature pattern in P. dulce is an indicator of specialized EFN (Sharma and Pillai 1982; Dave and Menon 1987). A similar pattern of the vascular system comprised of the main vascular system of the petiole along with accessory bundles ensuring the exclusive supply of photoassimilates towards EFNs has been reported in Chamaecrista species (Coutinho et al. 2012, 2022).

In the majority of plants, the nectariferous cells (both floral and extrafloral) remain intact during the whole period of secretion (merocrine). The nectar secretion may occur through a transport pathway between nectariferous parenchyma to secretory cells or between nectariferous parenchyma to intercellular space and final exudation through modified stomata (Fahn 1987). On the contrary, the mature nectary in P. dulce showed nectar secretion associated with the dissolution of nectariferous cells. Hence, nectar secretion in P. dulce occurs in a holocrine manner. A similar kind of secretion has been previously reported in extrafloral nectaries of Sambucus sp. (Morini 1886), Opuntia monacantha (Daumann 1930), and Sambucus nigra (Fahn 1987).

The examination of changes in the cell wall and cytoplasm at different developmental stages of the nectariferous cells of P. dulce revealed characteristic features associated with the transport and secretion of nectar and subsequent autolysis of cells. During the pre-secretion stage, nectariferous cells showed dense cytoplasm rich in ribosomes, mitochondria, large nuclei often with more than one nucleoli, and plastids with accumulated starch grains. These cytological features indicate the active metabolic status of the cells. In poplar, the nectariferous parenchyma is distinguished from ground parenchyma by the presence of a dense granular cytoplasm rich in ribosome, mitochondria, and chloroplast suggesting high metabolic activity required for nectar production (Escalante-Perez et al. 2012). The presence of chloroplasts in the nectariferous cells is an indication of the contribution of plastids to the bulk of sugar secretion in floral nectaries (Pacini et al. 2003; Nepi 2007). In P. dulce, rough ER and smooth ER are abundantly found in the secretory stage. The RER is commonly attributed to the bulk production of protein (Werker and Voughan 1976), whereas SER has been attributed to lipid production in various secretory cells (Werker and Fahn 1981). In the present study, the occurrence of Golgi, secretory vesicles, ER, and plasmalemma near the plasmodesmata and the subsequent appearance of secretions in the intercellular and subcuticular spaces have been noticed during the secretory phase. Therefore, the abundance of ER cisternae which coincides with the onset of secretory activity suggests that ER is the principal organelle involved in secretion. The presence of vesicular structures between the cell wall and plasmalemma (multivesicular lomasomes) is likely to be related to the maintenance of constancy in the plasmalemma surface which plausibly increased during secretion (Bosabalidis and Tsekos 1982; Mohan and Inamdar 1986). These observations suggest that, in EFNs of P. dulce, granulocrine secretion is involved in the transfer of secretory materials to intercellular locations. The granulocrine secretion in poplar is marked by the presence of extrafloral nectary vesicles located in the outer apoplastic space as well as in the tip of the secretory cells (Escalante-Perez et al., 2012). The increase in the density of mitochondria and the disappearance of starch grains from plastids towards the secretion stage indicates increased carbohydrate metabolism and energy transfer in nectariferous cells (Findlay and Mercer 1971; Mohan and Inamdar 1986). The utilization of starch for the supply of sugar reserve to the nectary parenchyma makes the presence of chloroplasts even more meaningful in the supply of energy for nectar production (Coutinho et al. 2012).

One of the major ultrastructural changes observed in the nectariferous cell during the pre-secretory and secretory stages is the cell wall structure. The pre-secretory stage is characterized by cells with intact cell walls and small intercellular spaces. During advanced stages, the loosening of cellulose microfibrils and dissolution of middle lamellae leads to a wide gap between the cells (subcuticular space). These spaces are filled with granular and fibrillar secretions plausibly through the granulocrine mode of secretion. Similar events have been reported in extrafloral nectaries of Plumeria sp. (Mohan and Inamdar 1986) and are proposed to help in enhancing the effectiveness of secretion. The assembly of endomembrane components, RER, SER, secretory vesicles, and plasmalemma near the loosely organized cell wall area devoid of plasmodesmata and the presence of fibrillar secretions in the adjacent subcuticular space suggest the possible apoplastic secretory pathway independent of plasmodesmata. The granular secretory products may penetrate through the space between loosely organized cellulose microfibrils and enter into subcuticular space.

The late secretory stages of EFNs in P. dulce are characterized by an increase in vascular volume, a distinct increase in convoluted ER cisternae, autophagic vacuoles, and cell wall disintegration. The disintegration of the cell wall facilitates the wide passage for floccular secretion into the intercellular and subcuticular spaces. The pressure produced by the accumulation of secretory products in the subcuticular spaces in granulocrine mode and cell wall disintegration causes the cuticle to burst open, releasing the secretory material to the outside (Findlay and Mercer 1971). Figure 1c demonstrates that the mature nectaries in P. dulce shows breaks in the cuticle suggesting cuticular rupture might also facilitate the active secretion during late stages. The proliferation of the ER and autophagic vacuoles at the late stages of nectary development appears to be related to the lytic process of the disintegrating cells. An increase in ER cisternae at the late stages of secretion has been reported in septal nectaries of banana (Fahn and Banouaiche 1979) and in extrafloral nectaries of Sambucus (Fahn 1987). Cellular autolysis is believed to be initiated by the breakdown of the tonoplast. The appearance of autophagic vacuoles during the cessation of secretion indicates that they play a major role in the cellular breakdown and ensures post-secretory changes in the cell and finally the cell death (Butler and Simon 1971; Dodge 1971; Mohan and Inamdar 1986).

The results of the present study on the cellular mechanism of nectar secretion in advanced type of EFNs in P. dulce suggest that the symplastic continuity through ER, vesicles, and plasmalemma either with plasmodesmata or with loosely organized cell wall plays an important role in nectar secretion during early stages, while the advanced stage is characterized by typical holocrine mode where cell death, disintegration of cell wall, and rupture of cuticle facilitates the late stages of secretion.

Funding

Open access funding provided by Royal Institute of Technology.

Declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. Boege K, Dirzo R, Siemens D, Brown P. Ontogenetic switches from plant resistance to tolerance: Minimizing costs with age? Ecol Lett. 2007;10:177–187. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.01012.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bosabalidis A, Teskos I. Ultrastructural studies on the secretory cavities of Citrus deliciosa ten. II. Development of essential oil accumulating central space of the gland and process of active secretion. Protoplasma. 1982;112:63–70. doi: 10.1007/BF01280216. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Butler RR, Simon EW. Ultrastructural aspects of senescence in plants. Adv Gerontol Res. 1971;3:73–129. [Google Scholar]
  4. Coutinho ÍAC, Francino DMT, Azevedo AA, Strozi Alves Meira RM. Anatomy of the extrafloral nectaries in species of Chamaecrista section Absus subsection Baseophyllum (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae) Flora. 2012;207:427–435. doi: 10.1016/j.flora.2012.03.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Coutinho ÍAC, Francino DMT, Dalvi VC, Strozi Alves Meira RM. Extrafloral nectary development, characterization and secretion in Chamaecrista debilis and Chamaecrista desvauxii var. langsdorfii (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae) Nord J Bot. 2022;2022:e03430. doi: 10.1111/njb.03430. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Daumann U. Die extrafloralen Nectarien an Sambucus nigra. Oesterr Bot Z. 1930;40:261–264. [Google Scholar]
  7. Dave YS, Menon ARS. Structure, origin and development of the extra floral nectaries of Pithecellobium dulce Benth. (Mimosaceae) Acta Bot Hung. 1987;33:117–123. [Google Scholar]
  8. Dalvi VC, Meira RM, Azevedo AA (2013) Extrafloral nectaries in neotropical Gentianaceae: occurrence, distribution patterns and anatomical characterization. Am J Bot 100:1779–1789 [DOI] [PubMed]
  9. Dalvi VC, de Faria GS, Azevedo AA. Calycinal secretory structures in Calolisianthus pedunculatus (Cham. & Schltdl) Gilg (Gentianaceae): anatomy, histochemistry, and functional aspects. Protoplasma. 2020;257:275–284. doi: 10.1007/s00709-019-01436-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Delgado MN, Da Silva LC, Báo SN, Morais HC, Azevedo AA. Distribution, structural and ecological aspects of the unusual leaf nectaries of Calolisianthus species (Gentaniaceae) Flora. 2011;206:676–683. doi: 10.1016/j.flora.2010.11.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dodge AD. The mode of action of bipyridylum herbicides, paraquat and diquat. Endeavour. 1971;30:130–135. doi: 10.1016/0160-9327(71)90039-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Durkee LT. The floral and extra-floral nectaries of Passiflora. II. The extra-floral nectary. Am J Bot. 1982;69:1420–1428. doi: 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1982.tb13390.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Durkee LT, Haber MH, Dorn L, Remington A. Morphology, ultrastructure and function of extrafloral nectaries in three species of Caesalpiniaceae. J Iowa Acad Sci. 1999;106:82–88. [Google Scholar]
  14. Elias TS. Morphology and anatomy of foliar nectaries of Pithecellobium macradenium (Leguminosae) Bot Gaz. 1972;133:38–42. doi: 10.1086/336611. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Escalante-Perez M, Jaborsky M, Lautan S, Fromm J, Muller T, Dittrich M, Kunert M, Boland W, Hedrich R, Ache P. Poplar extrafloral nectaries; two types, two strategies of indirect defenses against herbivores. Plant Physiol. 2012;159:1176–1191. doi: 10.1104/pp.112.196014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fahn A. The extra-floral nectaries of Sambucus nigra. Ann Bot. 1987;60:209–308. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a087448. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Fahn A, Banouaiche P. Ultrastructure of the nectary of Musa paradisiaca L. var. Sapientum Kuntze and its relation to nectar secretion. Ann Bot. 1979;44:85–93. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a085710. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Findlay N, Mercer FV. Nectar production in Abutilon. I. Movement of nectar through the cuticle. Aust J Biol Sci. 1971;24:647–656. doi: 10.1071/BI9710647. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Izzo TJ, Vasconcelos HL. Ants and plant size shape the structure of the arthropod community of Hirtella myrmecophila, an Amazonian ant-plant. Ecol Entomol. 2005;30:650–656. doi: 10.1111/j.0307-6946.2005.00736.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kulkarni KV, Jamakhandi VR. Medicinal uses of Pithecellobium dulce and its health benefits. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2018;7:700–704. [Google Scholar]
  21. Marazzi B, Bronstein JL, Koptur S. The diversity, ecology and evolution of extrafloral nectaries: current perspectives and future challenges. Ann Bot. 2013;111:1243–1450. doi: 10.1093/aob/mct109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Marazzi B, Gonzalez AM, Degado-Salinas A, Luckow MA, Ringelberg JJ, Hughes CE. Extrafloral nectaries in Leguminosae: phylogenetic distribution, morphological diversity and evolution. Aust Syst Bot. 2019;6:409–458. doi: 10.1071/SB19012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Melo Y, Machado SR, Alves M. Anatomy of extrafloral nectaries in Fabaceae from dry seasonal forest in Brazil. Bot J Linn Soc. 2010;163:87–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2010.01047.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Miller TEX. Does having multiple partners weaken the benefits of facultative mutualism? A test with cacti and cactus-tending ants. Oikos. 2007;116:500–512. doi: 10.1111/j.2007.0030-1299.15317.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Mohan JSS, Inamdar JA. Ultrastructure and secretion of extrafloral nectaries of Plumaria rubra L. Ann Bot. 1986;57:389–401. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a087121. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Morini F. Memorie della Real Academia di Bologna, Serie 4. Toma; 1886. Contributo all'anatomia ed alla fisiologia dei nettarii estranuziali; pp. 325–391. [Google Scholar]
  27. Murugesan S, Lakshmanan DK, Arumugam V, Alexander RA (2019) Nutritional and therapeutic benefits of medicinal plant Pithecellobium dulce (Fabaceae): a review. J Appl Pharm Sci 9:130–139
  28. Nepi M. Nectary structure and ultrastructure. In: Nicolson SW, Nepi M, Pacini E, editors. Nectaries and Nectar. Dordrecht: Springer; 2007. pp. 129–166. [Google Scholar]
  29. Nicolson SW, Thornburg RW. Nectar chemistry. In: Pacini E, editor. Nicolson SW, NepiM. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Nectaries and Nectar. Springer; 2007. pp. 167–214. [Google Scholar]
  30. Pacini E, Nepi M, Vesprini JL. Nectar biodiversity: a short review. Plant Syst Evol. 2003;238:7–21. doi: 10.1007/s00606-002-0277-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Pascal LM, Motte-Florac EF, McKey DB (2000) Secretory structures on the leaf rachis of Caesalpinieae and Mimosoideae (Leguminosae): implications for the evolution of nectary gland. Am J Bot 87:327–338 [PubMed]
  32. Sharma KC, Pillai A. The stem-node continuum in Pithecellobium dulce Benth. Indian J Bot. 1982;5:37–40. [Google Scholar]
  33. Souza AO, Lewis GP, José da Silva M. A new infrageneric classification of the pantropical genus Chamaecrista (Fabaceae: Caesalpinioideae) based on a comprehensive molecular phylogenetic analysis and morphology. Bot J Linn Soc. 2021;197:1–46. doi: 10.1093/botlinnean/boab029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Spurr AR. A low viscosity embedding medium for electron microscopy. J Ultrastruct Res. 1969;26:31–43. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5320(69)90033-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Thadeo M, Cassino MF, Vitarelli NC, Azevedo AA, Araújo JM, Valente VMM, Meira RMSA. Anatomical and histochemical characterization of extrafloral nectaries of Prockia cruces (Salicaceae) Am J Bot. 2008;95:1515–1522. doi: 10.3732/ajb.0800120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Villamil N, Marquez-Guzman J, Boege K. Understanding ontogenetic traits of indirect defense; ecological and anatomical constraints in the production of extrafloral nectaries. Ann Bot. 2013;112:701–709. doi: 10.1093/aob/mct005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Werker E, Fahn A. Secretory hairs of Inula viscosa (L.) Ait.- development, ultrastructure and secretion. Bot Gaz. 1981;142:461–476. doi: 10.1086/337247. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Werker E, Voughan JG. Ontogeny and distribution of myrosin cells in the shoot of Sinapis alba L. A light and electron microscope study. Israel J Bot. 1976;25:140–151. [Google Scholar]
  39. Young TP, Stubblefield CH, Isbell LA. Ants on swollen-thorn acacias: species coexistence in a simple system. Oecologia. 1997;109:98–107. doi: 10.1007/s004420050063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Protoplasma are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES