Abstract
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a member of the β-herpesviruses and is ubiquitous, infecting 50%–99% of the human population depending on ethnic and socioeconomic conditions. CMV establishes lifelong, latent infections in their host. Spontaneous reactivation of CMV is usually asymptomatic, but reactivation events in immunocompromised or immunosuppressed individuals can lead to severe morbidity and mortality. Moreover, herpesvirus infections have been associated with several cardiovascular and post-transplant diseases (stroke, atherosclerosis, post-transplant vasculopathy, and hypertension). Herpesviruses, including CMV, encode viral G-protein-coupled receptors (vGPCRs) that alter the host cell by hijacking signaling pathways that play important roles in the viral life cycle and these cardiovascular diseases. In this brief review, we discuss the pharmacology and signaling properties of these vGPCRs, and their contribution to hypertension. Overall, these vGPCRs can be considered attractive targets moving forward in the development of novel hypertensive therapies.
Keywords: blood pressure, cardiovascular diseases, chemokine receptors, cytomegalovirus, hypertension, US28, viral G-protein-coupled receptors
Graphical abstract
Graphical Abstract.
Upon reactivation of cytomegalovirus, chemokines bind to US28 to initiate RhoA/Rho kinase signaling in endothelium and smooth muscle leading to reduced dilation and constriction, respectively.
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a DNA virus that belongs to the herpes family of viruses [(β-herpesviruses)1]. CMV is widely distributed in the population and CMV infection has been associated with several cardiovascular diseases including stroke, atherosclerosis, post-transplant vasculopathy, and hypertension.2 Herpesviruses, including CMV encode viral G-protein-coupled receptors (vGPCRs) that alter the host cell by hijacking signaling pathways important to the viral life cycle and these cardiovascular disease conditions.3 In this brief review, we discuss the pharmacology and signaling properties of these vGPCRs, and their contribution to hypertension. Because of their prominent role, vGPCRs are promising drug targets for the treatment of hypertension. For those individuals desiring a more in-depth treatment of the subject several recent reviews are recommended.
FAMILY OF vGPCRs
Herpesvirus-encoded GPCRs
Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is a member of the β-herpesviruses and is ubiquitous, infecting 50%–99% of the human population depending on ethnic and socioeconomic conditions.3 It causes immediate, life-threatening diseases only in individuals with impaired, immature, or senescent immunity. However, the severity of HCMV on human health is understated since HCMV is associated with hypertension, and uncontrolled, elevated arterial pressure can lead to disability, poor quality of life or even a deadly heart attack or stroke.3–7
HCMV has a large double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) genome that encodes over 200 proteins involved in control of viral gene expression, DNA replication (e.g., DNA polymerase), viral entry, cell-to-cell spread, immune evasion, and pathogenesis.2 Among these regulatory proteins, HCMV encodes G-protein-coupled receptors (viral GPCRs). HCMV encodes 4 vGPCRs that alter the host cell by hijacking cellular pathways and play important roles in the viral life cycle: US28, US27, JL33, and UL78—the first 3 have similarities to chemokine receptor structure.
Other important information about vGPCRs2:
Mouse and rat CMV encode homologs of UL33 and UL78, but not US28 and US27.
vGPCRs can signal in a ligand-independent, constitutively active manner via several G proteins (Gαq, Gαi, Gαs, and Gα12/13).
US28 is activated by chemokines (natural and chimeric).
UL33, M33, and R33 activate PLCβ via coupling to Gq/11 subunits and via βγ subunits released from αi/o proteins.
HCMV productively infects multiple cell types including macrophages, smooth muscle cells, and endothelial cells.
Pharmacological properties of vGPCRs
Homology to chemokine receptors
As noted above, HCMV encodes 4 vGPCRs (US27, US28, UL33, and UL78). These viral receptors share homology with human chemokine receptors, and US28 has the highest homology [(35% with CX3CR1)8]. Due to this homology with human chemokine receptors, chemokines can bind to vGPCRs. Also, as with human chemokine receptors, the N terminus of the vGPCRs is necessary for ligand binding.9
Chemokine scavengers or sinks
It is possible that some vGPCRs could act as “chemokine scavengers” or “chemokine sinks.”3 Respectively, scavenging would change chemokine activity in a negative way and a sink would act to store chemokines for recruitment to amplify a chemokine signal.
Constitutively active receptors
Unlike most mammalian GPCRs, some vGPCRs (US28 and UL33) can signal in a ligand-independent manner and thus they have constitutive activity.3 Additionally, vGPCRs can couple, in a promiscuous manner, to several G proteins (Gαq, Gαi, Gαs, and Gα12/13) and signal constitutively.
Heteromerization or cross-talk with chemokine receptors
Cellular signaling mechanisms of human GPCRs can be positively or negatively modulated by vGPCRs. This occurs by either direct means (heterodimerization) or by indirect mechanisms [(signaling cross-talk; sharing of downstream signaling proteins; or transcriptional regulation of the GPCRs, ligands, or signaling proteins)3,10–14].
Downstream signaling of vGPCRs
Downstream signaling of vGPCRs (Figure 1) occurs via known pathways of mammalian GPCRs to include US28 activation of phospholipase C via Gαi/0 leading to elevated inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) and activation of diacylglycerol (DAG). IP3 leads to increased calcium release from intracellular stores and DAG activates protein kinase C (PKC) which phosphorylates specific target proteins. US28 also activates ERK2 (extracellular signal-regulated kinase 2), RhoA/Rho-associated protein kinase (RhoA/ROCK), Src (tyrosine kinase), nuclear localization of cytoplasmic NFAT (nuclear factor of activated T cells), NF-κB (nuclear factor κB), and p38-MAPK (p38 mitogen-activated kinase). These signaling pathways are known to play roles in vascular contraction and smooth muscle cell migration.
Figure 1.
Downstream signaling of vGPCRs occurs via known pathways of mammalian GPCRs to include US28 activation of phospholipase C via Gαi/0 leading to elevated IP3 and activation of DAG. IP3 leads to increased calcium release from intracellular stores and DAG activates PKC which phosphorylates specific target proteins. US28 also activates ERK2, RhoA/ROC), Src (tyrosine kinase), nuclear localization of cytoplasmic NFAT NF-κB, and p38-MAPK. These signaling pathways are known to play roles in vascular contraction and smooth muscle cell migration. Abbreviations: DAG, diacylglycerol; IP3, 1,4,5-trisphosphate; PKC, protein kinase C; vGPCRs, viral G-protein-coupled receptors.
CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE AND CMV
Hypertension and vascular dysfunction
CMV infection is associated with various chronic inflammatory diseases, including cardiovascular diseases.15 Hypertension is an important risk factor for morbidity and mortality caused by cardiovascular diseases, and many studies5,6,16 have shown that patients with a CMV infection have an increased risk of hypertension. Furthermore, given that 31% of normotensive subjects and 53% of hypertensive subjects are infected with CMV, CMV may be a risk factor for but not necessarily an independent cause of hypertension. However, the association between CMV and hypertension remains unclear, and thus the effect of CMV infection on blood pressure is controversial.
In healthy individuals, both primary infection and the reactivation of latent virus rarely cause any significant clinical manifestations, owing to the robust immune response of the host. One of the mechanisms involved in the virus latency is dependent of BMPR2/YY1 (bone morphogenetic protein receptor type 2/yin yang 1) signaling axis in progenitor cells.17 Maintenance of viral latency requires a vigorous and vigilant immune system, highly dependent upon competent cytotoxic T cells, and any changes in immune status tend to promote viral reactivation.18
To clarify the association between CMV infection and hypertension, meta-analysis studies were conducted.5,19 The largest one included a total of 11,878 participants to 9 trials, of whom 3,864 were patients with hypertension and 8,014 were normotensive controls. The 9 studies included were conducted in various geographical areas: 1 in Denmark,20 5 in China,6,16,21,22 1 in Iran,23 and 2 in United States.7,24 All studies from China described an association between CMV and hypertension; however, the study from Denmark and one of the studies from United States did not reach the same conclusion.20,24 The other study conducted in the United States found an association between CMV antibodies and hypertension only in women.7 The meta-analysis indicated that CMV is closely associated with human hypertension, but only in Chinese individuals.19
Infection with CMV as a cause of hypertension was discussed by Cheng et al. Using a mouse model infected with CMV for 10 weeks, this study demonstrated that infection was associated with an increase in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, independent of atherosclerotic plaque formation in the aorta. The authors suggested that the increase in blood pressure was mediated by inflammation and activation of the renin–angiotensin system. As evidence for this mechanism, infected mice exhibited increased serum concentration of IL-6 (interleukin-6), TNF-α (tumor necrosis factor-alpha), MCP-1 (monocyte-chemoattractant protein-1), and Ang II (angiotensin-II). Additionally, human and mouse renal cells and human endothelial cells infected with CMV displayed a concentration-dependent increase in renin expression.25 The authors concluded that CMV infection is a risk factor for increased blood pressure.
An elegant study by Li et al. using a microarray-based miRNA expression profiling found high expression of hcmv-miR-UL112, which is a HCMV-encoded miRNA, in hypertensive patients. Interestingly, there were no differences in the miRNA expression levels between hypertensive patients receiving antihypertensive treatments and those that were not. In addition, seropositivity, log-transformed copies of HCMV, and hcmv-miR-UL112 were independently associated with an increased risk of hypertension. The authors also showed that IRF-1 (Interferon Regulatory Factor 1), which plays a role in inflammation and vascular disease pathogenesis, is a direct target of hcmv-miR-UL112.16
Vascular dysfunction is one of the main causes and complications of hypertension.26 The origin of vascular dysfunction in hypertension has been studied for many decades and CMV infection is a potential contributing factor to this disorder.5 Grahame-Clarke et al. analyzed vascular function in patients with positive and negative HCMV serology using venous occlusion plethysmography and responses to different agonists. Individuals who were seropositive for HCMV had reduced responses to bradykinin and glyceryl trinitrate, suggesting that HCMV-seropositive individuals have endothelial dysfunction and impaired responses to NO (nitric oxide).27 Moreover, a negative correlation between CMV DNA in plasma and endothelial function, independent of other cardiovascular risk factors, was found in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.28
In fact, CMV can infect endothelial cells and activate mechanisms that lead to inflammation and dysfunction. HCMV infection of endothelial cells leads to decreased expression of RGS5 (regulator of G-protein signaling 5) and promotes proliferation.29 In addition, CMV can activate coagulation cascades and contribute to thrombus formation by increasing von Willebrand factor, ICAM-1 (intercellular adhesion molecule-1), and VCAM-1 (vascular cell adhesion molecule-1) in endothelial cells.30 Hypertensive patients with positive CMV IgM antibodies presented high plasma levels of endothelin and P-selectin, suggesting that active CMV infection may aggravate vascular endothelium lesions in hypertension.22
The release of inflammatory mediators by endothelial cells can be caused by nearby tissue inflammation or by direct infection of endothelial cells. Endothelial cells are activated by a wide range of stimuli, including shear stress, DAMPs (damage-associated molecular patterns), PAMPs (pathogen-associated molecular patterns), and inflammatory mediators.26 van de Berg et al. proposed a model for noninfected endothelial cell damage during CMV latency. Local reactivation of CMV leads to maintenance of CD4- and CD8-specific effector T cells, which conduct to systemic immune and endothelial cells activation, leading to the production of chemokines and adhesion molecules.31 Pachnio et al. confirmed that CMV-specific CD4 T cells carry a chemokine receptor (CX3CR1) that directs the T cells to activate endothelial cells within blood vessels, suggesting that CMV immune response activation may lead to vascular dysfunction.32
CMV infection also impairs the nitric oxide synthase (NOS)/NO signaling in human microvascular and aortic endothelial cells.33 There are 3 isoforms of NOS: endothelial NOS (eNOS), neuronal NOS (nNOS), and inducible NOS (iNOS); the first 2 are constitutive enzymes that contribute to vascular homeostasis, and iNOS is activated mainly by stress signals/stimuli.34 Infection of endothelial cells induces iNOS expression and leads to increased superoxide anion generation, reduced DDAH (dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase) activity and thereby increased ADMA (asymmetric dimethylarginine) formation. ADMA is an endogenous inhibitor of eNOS, and CMV-induced accumulation of ADMA is linked to reduced activity of DDAH, the enzyme that degrades ADMA.35 In addition, CMV also suppresses Akt and activates p38 MAPK causing eNOS inhibition and aortic endothelial cell dysfunction.
Despite the fact that endothelial cells can be infected by CMV and this viral infection can cause endothelial dysfunction, some studies have shown that endothelial cells do not contribute to HCMV dissemination.36 A study showed that vascular endothelial and smooth muscle cells are unlikely to be important sites of CMV latency in vivo.37 Nevertheless, pericytes, which are multipotent cells of the vascular system and direct interaction with endothelial cells, can be infected by CMV, and the virus can replicate within pericytes, thus contributing to vascular inflammation.38
Although the contribution of CMV to hypertension is evident, the mechanisms that lead to viral infection, causing vascular dysfunction and increased blood pressure still need to be investigated.
Sympathetic activation
Stressful conditions induce hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal and sympathetic–adrenal–medullary axes activation, leading to the release of several mediators, such as catecholamines and glucocorticoids. Epinephrine may induce molecular events that promote (re)activation of CMV expression and replication. Prosch et al. described that within a few days following the highly stressful event of acute myocardial infarction, all patients developed CMV antigenemia.39 The authors observed a strong correlation between plasma catecholamine peak levels in the early postinfarction period and the frequency of CMV antigen-positive cells after 1 week.
Though acute responses to stress can be positive, long duration or chronically high levels of stress hormones negatively affect the regulation of the immune system and its individual components.40 Changes, both in form (phenotype) and function (killing capacity), of many immune cells result in decreased cell-mediated immunity, which facilitates opportunistic reactivation of latent viruses.41 CMV is the only β-herpesvirus known to reactivate in astronauts and this finding coincided with high cortisol levels and immune system dysregulation.18 Hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal and sympathetic–adrenal–medullary axes activation occurs during spaceflight, as indicated by increased levels of stress hormones, including cortisol, dehydroepiandrosterone, epinephrine, and norepinephrine. These changes, along with decreased cell-mediated immunity, contribute to the reactivation of latent herpes viruses in astronauts.
Evidence have also shown that CMV infection impairs arterial activity by activation of the sympathetic nervous system. In a rat model of irradiation-induced immunosuppression, CMV infection was found to alter heart rate regulation causing tachycardia, changes in arterial reactivity, and marked blood pressure reduction.42 The arterial changes were more marked in small arteries than in the aorta, which was hyporesponsive to adrenergic stimulus. These alterations could not be reversed by the NOS inhibitor l-NAME, but were prevented by the alpha-1 antagonist prazosin, demonstrating that excessive α1 adrenergic stimulation of arterial smooth muscle contributes to the selective alteration of excitation–contraction coupling. This suggests that CMV infection results in vascular failure independently of NOS, but via activation of the sympathetic nervous system.42
Vascular stiffness
Recent research has shown that CMV seropositivity is independently associated with increased arterial stiffness in patients with chronic kidney disease. The exact mechanisms by which CMV infection contributes to vascular stiffness remain unclear, but there is evidence of the contribution of certain immune cell subsets, particularly memory T cells,43 Th1,44 senescent CD8 T cells,45 and inducible Tregs.46
CD4 and CD8 effector memory T cells have a destabilizing effect on atherosclerotic plaques, mainly in older men.43 CMV infection has a positive association with memory T cells subsets, that is associated with carotid-to-femoral pulse-wave velocity (PVW), a cardiovascular risk factor to atherosclerosis. Interestingly, this finding was described only in older white men and not in women.47
Chanouzas et al. described that one of the host cellular immune responses to CMV, namely the cytotoxic CD4+CD28null T cell, is a Th1-skewed proinflammatory T cell that produces IFN-γ (interferon-gamma) and TNF-α in response to stimulation with CMV lysate.44 The expansion of this cell type is independently linked to PVW and arterial stiffness in patients with ANCA (anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody)-associated vasculitis, an autoimmune disease.
The other cell type that contributes to CMV infection and vascular disease is senescence T cells. Senescence T cells produce a lot of proinflammatory cytokines, exerts greater cytotoxicity and is associated with inflammatory diseases, including cardiovascular disease.48 In humans, CMV is known to be one of the most important antigens for repetitive T-cell stimulation inducing senescence.49 Yu et al. demonstrated, in a Korean population, that PVW is strongly correlated with the frequency of CMV-specific senescent CD8 T cells. In this study, arterial stiffness was associated with CMV-specific IFN-γ and TNF-α secretion and with the cytotoxic degranulation of CD8+ T cells.45
Terrazzini et al. also observed an association between inducible Tregs specific to CMV peptides and blood pressure.46 This type of T cell is induced by the same antigens as those that induce a conventional T-cell response and is involved in attenuating the immune response. This finding was associated with old age, specifically in older women, and the authors suggested that it can contribute to the delay of significant cardiovascular events by driving a more chronic process.
Atherosclerosis
Acute CMV infection causes ascites, myocarditis, pulmonary artery inflammation, and infiltrate of macrophages and T lymphocytes accelerating inflammation in vascular tissue overexpressing MCP-1.50 Some authors suggest that the presence of CMV in inflamed tissues implicates this virus in atherogenesis.50 A meta-analysis involving 30 studies, 3,328 patients with atherosclerosis, and 2,090 controls showed that HCMV infection is significantly associated with an increased risk for atherosclerosis.51 This study indicated that CMV infection in Asian populations was high compared with other ethnicities.
A handful of reviews cover the potential role of CMV in atherosclerosis.52–55 CMV has direct and indirect effects on atherosclerosis. Many studies have identified CMV antigens in resected atherosclerotic plaques.54 Besides, the virus infection can contribute to the main pathways involved in atherogenesis, such as chronic inflammation, plaque development, plaque rupture, and vascular events.53 CMV can lurk in many types of cells, like epithelial cells, endothelial cells, macrophages, and so on, causing immune status change and chronic inflammation.56 The potential molecular mechanisms activated by CMV, detailed by Zhu et al., are generation of reactive oxygen species, dysregulation of lipid metabolism, miRNA regulation, ER (endoplasmic reticulum) stress, and inhibition of autophagy.52
Vascular smooth muscle cells can also be infected by CMV with a pro-atherogenic effect. In vitro, the virus directly activates the PDGF (platelet-derived growth factor) system, which may promote atherogenesis and restenosis by activation of human coronary artery smooth muscle cell proliferation and neointima formation.57 CMV infection can also change vascular smooth muscle cell function through ADAM9 expression, a metalloproteinase that is implicated in the development of vascular disease.58
CMV infection increases reactive oxygen species in vascular smooth muscle cells, leading to excessive ox-LDL (oxidized-low-density lipoprotein) production. Furthermore, CMV infection of murine aortic smooth muscle cell produces plaques, fibroblast differentiation and induces calcification.
The effect of CMV infection on the mouse heart was described as muscle thickening, collagen accumulation in the epicardium, fibrosis, and increased heart rate. Interestingly, the use of the anti-CMV drug, ganciclovir, appears to lower heart transplant related atherosclerosis.59
Stroke
Although CMV infection is associated with some cardiovascular diseases, conflicting results have been found when analyzing the effect of CMV infection on the risk of stroke. A study of 2,844 men and 3,257 women in the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey found a strong association between CMV and stroke only in women.60 Conversely, a study of 8,531 individuals in the United Kingdom Biobank found no association between CMV seropositivity and risk of CVD, ischemic heart disease, or stroke.61
In a meta-analysis on the effect of CMV infection on stroke risk comprising 3 studies,2 2 reported that CMV infection was associated with slightly or moderately increased relative risk of stroke,62,63 and 1 that CMV infection was associated with slightly decreased risk of stroke.64 The result of the meta-analysis estimated an increased relative risk of stroke of 1.16, and this result was nonsignificant. However, in this same meta-analysis, the authors found strong indications that CMV infection may predispose to CVD events.
CHEMOKINES AND VIRAL GPCRs COLLIDE TO EXPLAIN HCMV-RELATED HYPERTENSION
Chemokines
Chemokines are small, highly conserved families of secreted proteins composed of cytokines or signaling proteins,65 responsible for regulating chemotaxis.66 Chemokines perform their function by associating with over 20 chemokine receptors which are GPCRs,67 thereby affecting a variety of biological processes such as implantation of the early conceptus, the migration of cells during embryonic development, wound healing, and maintenance of innate and adaptive immunity. When the physiological role of chemokines is subverted or chronically amplified, disease often follows, such as cancer,68 cardiovascular diseases,69 liver diseases,70 and intestinal diseases.71 Chemokines are classified into 4 major families, CXC, CC, XC, and CX3C, by the arrangement of their N-terminal cysteines.67 CXC and CC are the major subfamilies of chemokines. Among the CC chemokine subfamilies, CCL2, also known as MCP-1, was the first to be discovered.72,73 It consists of 76 amino acids at 13 kDa and has 2 adjacent amino-terminal cysteine residues.74 CCL2 is primarily secreted by immune cells and its expression can be either persistent or inducible. In addition, smooth muscle cells, endothelial cells, thylakoid cells, and fibroblasts are also capable of producing CCL2.75–77 Many mediators can induce CCL2 expression, including IL-1, IL-4, IL-6, TNF-α, TGF-β (transforming growth factor-beta), and IFN-γ.78,79 CCL2 regulates the migration and infiltration of monocytes, macrophages, memory T lymphocytes, and NK (natural killer) cells.66,74 CCL2 binds to a large number of receptors to coordinate inflammatory monocyte transport among bone marrow, circulating and atherosclerotic plaques.69 CCL2 binding to CCR4 activates myosin light chain phosphorylation and regulates cell motility and metastasis of tumors.80 Additionally, CCL2 can bind to atypical chemokine receptors (ACKRs), including ACKR1 and ACKR2, which can alter chemokine gradients.81 Although CCL2 can bind to a variety of receptors, CCR2 is still considered to be the primary receptor for the chemokine.
CCL2–CCR2 axis and hypertension
In 2017, the American Heart Association along with the American College of Cardiology established new guidelines for blood pressure management and defined hypertension as a blood pressure at or above 130/80 mm Hg. Hypertension contributes to a variety of serious health complications including cardiac failure, stroke, and renal failure. Chronic inflammation in the vascular wall contributes to the initiation and maintenance of elevated arterial pressure in patients and animal models of the condition.82 The CCL2/CCR2 axis is a necessary mediator of the vascular inflammatory response and has been shown to play a critical role in vascular remodeling, and hypertrophy via monocyte infiltration and macrophage recruitment.83,84 Angiotensin II stimulates the vascular expression of the CCL2 gene via the Ang II type-1 (AT1) receptor.85 CCL2 expression is elevated in vascular tissue of animals made hypertensive by Ang II treatment.86 CCR2 played a crucial role in macrophage infiltration, vascular hypertrophy, inflammation, and remodeling in animal models of Ang II-induced hypertension. In CCR2-deficient mice, infiltration of arterial wall macrophages was nearly abolished and vascular hypertrophy was significantly reduced.83 Ang II-induced inflammation and remodeling of blood vessels was significantly attenuated in CCR2 knockout mice.84 In 740 hypertensive patients, soluble CCL2 was observed to be increased and this correlated with the extent of organ injury.87 Further, CCR2 expression was elevated in monocytes of hypertensive patients and decreased after treatment with Ang II receptor blockers.84
The CCL2–CCR2 axis plays an important role in the progression of hypertensive kidney damage. In patients with salt-sensitive hypertension, the CCL2–CCR2 signaling pathway is enhanced and exacerbates renal injury.88 Lack of CCL2 reduced cortical atrophy and reduced the number of infiltrating monocytes, thereby preventing chronic renal injury in mice with renal hypertension.89 The CCR2 antagonist RS102895 prevented leukocyte infiltration into the kidney and attenuated salt-sensitive hypertension and renal injury. Thus, the CCL2–CCR2 axis leads to salt-sensitive hypertension by altering renal leukocyte infiltration.90
HYPOTHESIS
As noted above, CMV is usually latent in most individuals without symptomology. During reactivation of CMV, macrophages, endothelial and vascular smooth cells can become infected, and the virus causes these cells to express vGPCRs to reinitiate the viral life cycle (Figure 2). Stimuli39,82,91,92 that reactivate the virus are: psychological stress (sympathetic hyperactivation), inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, TNF-α); ischemia reperfusion injury; DNA damage; and oxidative stress. Once activated, these vGPCRs hijack signaling pathways that are also important for vascular function (remodeling and constriction). In humans, the vGPCRs, US28 and UL33 would be the major players in altering vascular function. Chemokines bind to US28 to initiate RhoA/Rho kinase signaling in endothelium and smooth muscle leading to reduced dilation and constriction, respectively. Importantly, it is known that chemokines and their receptors play an important role in hypertension82,93 and chemokine antagonists lower blood pressure.94 Additionally, constitutive activity of UL33 would increase in vascular smooth muscle leading to stimulation of PLC and NF-κB to cause vasoconstriction and vascular remodeling, respectively (Figure 3). These changes in the vasculature would contribute to increased vascular resistance maintaining blood pressure at high levels in hypertension.
Figure 2.
During reactivation of CMV, endothelial and vascular smooth cells can become infected, and the virus causes these cells to express vGPCRs to reinitiate the viral life cycle. Stimuli that reactivate the virus are: psychological stress, inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, TNF-α); ischemia reperfusion injury; DNA damage; and oxidative stress. Once activated, these vGPCRs hijack signaling pathways that are also important for vascular function (remodeling, dilation, and constriction). In humans, the vGPCRs, US28 and UL33 would be the major players in altering vascular function. Chemokines bind to US28 to initiate RhoA/Rho kinase signaling in endothelium and smooth muscle leading to reduced dilation and constriction, respectively. Abbreviations: CMV, cytomegalovirus; vGPCRs, viral G-protein-coupled receptors.
Figure 3.
Upon reactivation of cytomegalovirus, constitutive activity of UL33 is increased in vascular smooth muscle leading to stimulation of PLC and NF-κB to cause vasoconstriction and vascular remodeling, respectively.
SIGNIFICANCE.
G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) constitute the largest family of membrane receptors with great diversity.6 Due to their role as important regulators of numerous cellular processes, GPCRs exhibit central relevance to the current clinical practice of medicine.
The appearance of viral vGPCRs in genomes of herpesviruses is probably a result of viral hijacking during coevolution with the respective hosts. Importantly, recent work7 suggests that SARS-CoV-2 may also potentially alter second messenger signaling cascades via activation of GPCRs. Thus, this work addresses a highly significant area of research and provides important strategies for the pharmacological treatment of hypertension associated with many ubiquitous viral infections.
Contributor Information
Gisele F Bomfim, Institute of Health Sciences, Federal University of Mato Grosso, campus Sinop (UFMT), Sinop, MT, Brazil; Cardiovascular Translational Research Center, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
Fernanda Priviero, Cardiovascular Translational Research Center, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA; Biomedical Engineering Program, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA; Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
Emma Poole, Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Rita C Tostes, Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of Sao Paulo (FMRP-USP), Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil.
John H Sinclair, Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Dimitrios Stamou, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mark J Uline, Cardiovascular Translational Research Center, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA; Biomedical Engineering Program, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA; Department of Chemical Engineering, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
Mark R Wills, Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Cambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology and Infectious Disease, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
R Clinton Webb, Cardiovascular Translational Research Center, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA; Biomedical Engineering Program, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA; Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
FUNDING
R.C.W.: RO1 awards from the National Institute of Health - USA (DK132948 and HL134604), a PO1 award (HL13604), and a pilot award from the NIDDK Diabetic Complication Consortium; G.F.B.: Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico - Brazil (402664/2022-1).
DISCLOSURE
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. All coauthors have seen and agree with the contents of the manuscript and there is no financial interest to report.
REFERENCES
- 1. Britt W. Manifestations of human cytomegalovirus infection: proposed mechanisms of acute and chronic disease. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 2008; 325:417–470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Wang H, Peng G, Bai J, He B, Huang K, Hu X, Liu D.. Cytomegalovirus infection and relative risk of cardiovascular disease (ischemic heart disease, stroke, and cardiovascular death): a meta-analysis of prospective studies up to 2016. J Am Heart Assoc 2017; 6:e005025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. De Groof TWM, Elder EG, Siderius M, Heukers R, Sinclair JH, Smit MJ.. Viral G protein-coupled receptors: attractive targets for herpesvirus-associated diseases. Pharmacol Rev 2021; 73:828–846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Jeong SJ, Han SH, Kim CO, Choi JY, Song YG, Kim JM.. Association between human cytomegalovirus antibody levels, and essential hypertension and functional status in elderly Koreans. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2016; 16:21–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Hui J, Qu YY, Tang N, Liu YM, Zhong H, Wang LM, Feng Q, Li Z, He F.. Association of cytomegalovirus infection with hypertension risk: a meta-analysis. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2016; 128:586–591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Tang N, Li JW, Liu YM, Zhong H, Wang LM, Deng FM, Qu YY, Hui J, Cheng J, Tang B, Huang G, Guo SX, Li XZ, Wei LL, He F.. Human cytomegalovirus infection is associated with essential hypertension in Kazakh and Han Chinese populations. Med Sci Monit 2014; 20:2508–2519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Li C, Samaranayake NR, Ong KL, Wong HK, Cheung BM.. Is human cytomegalovirus infection associated with hypertension? The United States National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999–2002. PLoS One 2012; 7:e39760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. de Munnik SM, Smit MJ, Leurs R, Vischer HF.. Modulation of cellular signaling by herpesvirus-encoded G protein-coupled receptors. Front Pharmacol 2015; 6:40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Scholten DJ, Canals M, Maussang D, Roumen L, Smit MJ, Wijtmans M, de Graaf C, Vischer HF, Leurs R.. Pharmacological modulation of chemokine receptor function. Br J Pharmacol 2012; 165:1617–1643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. El-Asmar L, Springael JY, Ballet S, Andrieu EU, Vassart G, Parmentier M.. Evidence for negative binding cooperativity within CCR5-CCR2b heterodimers. Mol Pharmacol 2005; 67:460–469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Sohy D, Parmentier M, Springael JY.. Allosteric transinhibition by specific antagonists in CCR2/CXCR4 heterodimers. J Biol Chem 2007; 282:30062–30069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Sohy D, Yano H, de Nadai P, Urizar E, Guillabert A, Javitch JA, Parmentier M, Springael JY.. Hetero-oligomerization of CCR2, CCR5, and CXCR4 and the protean effects of “selective” antagonists. J Biol Chem 2009; 284:31270–31279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Chabre M, Deterre P, Antonny B.. The apparent cooperativity of some GPCRs does not necessarily imply dimerization. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2009; 30:182–187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Prezeau L, Rives ML, Comps-Agrar L, Maurel D, Kniazeff J, Pin JP.. Functional crosstalk between GPCRs: with or without oligomerization. Curr Opin Pharmacol 2010; 10:6–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Soderberg-Naucler C. Does cytomegalovirus play a causative role in the development of various inflammatory diseases and cancer? J Intern Med 2006; 259:219–246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Li S, Zhu J, Zhang W, Chen Y, Zhang K, Popescu LM, Ma X, Lau WB, Rong R, Yu X, Wang B, Li Y, Xiao C, Zhang M, Wang S, Yu L, Chen AF, Yang X, Cai J.. Signature microRNA expression profile of essential hypertension and its novel link to human cytomegalovirus infection. Circulation 2011; 124:175–184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Poole E, Carlan da Silva MC, Huang C, Perera M, Jackson S, Groves IJ, Wills M, Rana A, Sinclair J, Carlan da Silva MC, Huang C, Perera M, Jackson S, Groves IJ, Wills M, Rana A, Sinclair J.. A BMPR2/YY1 signaling axis is required for human cytomegalovirus latency in undifferentiated myeloid cells. mBio 2021; 12:e0022721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Rooney BV, Crucian BE, Pierson DL, Laudenslager ML, Mehta SK.. Herpes virus reactivation in astronauts during spaceflight and its application on earth. Front Microbiol 2019; 10:16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Wang Z, Peng X, Li M, Jin F, Zhang B, Wang H, Wei Y.. Is human cytomegalovirus infection associated with essential hypertension? A meta-analysis of 11,878 participants. J Med Virol 2016; 88:852–858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Kristensen BO, Andersen PL, Vestergaard BF, Andersen HM.. Herpesvirus antibodies and vascular complications in essential hypertension. Acta Med Scand 1982; 212:375–377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Chen T, Kong Q, Cao H.. [The study on cytomegalovirus infection associated with vascular complications in patients with essential hypertension]. Zhonghua Shi Yan He Lin Chuang Bing Du Xue Za Zhi 1999; 13:23–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Feng T, Yuan H, Yuan H.. [Cytomegalovirus infection associated with plasma endothelin and P-selectin in patients with essential hypertension]. Zhonghua Shi Yan He Lin Chuang Bing Du Xue Za Zhi 2001; 15:377–379. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Vahdat K, Pourbehi MR, Ostovar A, Hadavand F, Bolkheir A, Assadi M, Farrokhnia M, Nabipour I.. Association of pathogen burden and hypertension: the Persian Gulf Healthy Heart Study. Am J Hypertens 2013; 26:1140–1147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Roberts ET, Haan MN, Dowd JB, Aiello AE.. Cytomegalovirus antibody levels, inflammation, and mortality among elderly Latinos over 9 years of follow-up. Am J Epidemiol 2010; 172:363–371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Cheng J, Ke Q, Jin Z, Wang H, Kocher O, Morgan JP, Zhang J, Crumpacker CS.. Cytomegalovirus infection causes an increase of arterial blood pressure. PLoS Pathog 2009; 5:e1000427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Cicalese SM, da Silva JF, Priviero F, Webb RC, Eguchi S, Tostes RC.. Vascular stress signaling in hypertension. Circ Res 2021; 128:969–992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Grahame-Clarke C, Chan NN, Andrew D, Ridgway GL, Betteridge DJ, Emery V, Colhoun HM, Vallance P.. Human cytomegalovirus seropositivity is associated with impaired vascular function. Circulation 2003; 108:678–683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Lebedeva A, Maryukhnich E, Grivel JC, Vasilieva E, Margolis L, Shpektor A.. Productive cytomegalovirus infection is associated with impaired endothelial function in ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Am J Med 2020; 133:133–142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Zhang X, Tang N, Xi D, Feng Q, Liu Y, Wang L, Tang Y, Zhong H, He F.. Human cytomegalovirus promoting endothelial cell proliferation by targeting regulator of G-protein signaling 5 hypermethylation and downregulation. Sci Rep 2020; 10:2252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Rahbar A, Söderberg-Nauclér C, Soderberg-Naucler C.. Human cytomegalovirus infection of endothelial cells triggers platelet adhesion and aggregation. J Virol 2005; 79:2211–2220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. van de Berg PJ, Yong SL, Remmerswaal EB, van Lier RA, ten Berge IJ.. Cytomegalovirus-induced effector T cells cause endothelial cell damage. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2012; 19:772–779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Pachnio A, Ciaurriz M, Begum J, Lal N, Zuo J, Beggs A, Moss P.. Cytomegalovirus infection leads to development of high frequencies of cytotoxic virus-specific CD4+ T cells targeted to vascular endothelium. PLoS Pathog 2016; 12:e1005832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Suvorava T, Metry S, Pick S, Kojda G.. Alterations in endothelial nitric oxide synthase activity and their relevance to blood pressure. Biochem Pharmacol 2022; 205:115256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Griendling KK, Camargo LL, Rios FJ, Alves-Lopes R, Montezano AC, Touyz RM.. Oxidative stress and hypertension. Circ Res 2021; 128:993–1020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Weis M, Kledal TN, Lin KY, Panchal SN, Gao SZ, Valantine HA, Mocarski ES, Cooke JP.. Cytomegalovirus infection impairs the nitric oxide synthase pathway: role of asymmetric dimethylarginine in transplant arteriosclerosis. Circulation 2004; 109:500–505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Sacher T, Andrassy J, Kalnins A, Dolken L, Jordan S, Podlech J, Ruzsics Z, Jauch KW, Reddehase MJ, Koszinowski UH.. Shedding light on the elusive role of endothelial cells in cytomegalovirus dissemination. PLoS Pathog 2011; 7:e1002366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Reeves MB, Coleman H, Chadderton J, Goddard M, Sissons JGP, Sinclair JH.. Vascular endothelial and smooth muscle cells are unlikely to be major sites of latency of human cytomegalovirus in vivo. J Gen Virol 2004; 85:3337–3341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Alcendor DJ. Human vascular pericytes and cytomegalovirus pathobiology. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 20:1456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Prosch S, Wendt CE, Reinke P, Priemer C, Oppert M, Kruger DH, Volk HD, Docke WD.. A novel link between stress and human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection: sympathetic hyperactivity stimulates HCMV activation. Virology 2000; 272:357–365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Crucian BE, Zwart SR, Mehta S, Uchakin P, Quiriarte HD, Pierson D, Sams CF, Smith SM.. Plasma cytokine concentrations indicate that in vivo hormonal regulation of immunity is altered during long-duration spaceflight. J Interferon Cytokine Res 2014; 34:778–786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Strewe C, Crucian BE, Sams CF, Feuerecker B, Stowe RP, Chouker A, Feuerecker M.. Hyperbaric hyperoxia alters innate immune functional properties during NASA Extreme Environment Mission Operation (NEEMO). Brain Behav Immun 2015; 50:52–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Eerdmans PH, Persoons MC, Debets SJ, Struijker Boudier HA, Smits JF, Bruggeman CA, De Mey JG, De Mey JG.. Impaired arterial reactivity following cytomegalovirus infection in the immunosuppressed rat. Br J Pharmacol 1996; 119:637–646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Ammirati E, Moroni F, Magnoni M, Camici PG.. The role of T and B cells in human atherosclerosis and atherothrombosis. Clin Exp Immunol 2015; 179:173–187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Chanouzas D, Sagmeister M, Dyall L, Sharp P, Powley L, Johal S, Bowen J, Nightingale P, Ferro CJ, Morgan MD, Moss P, Harper L.. The host cellular immune response to cytomegalovirus targets the endothelium and is associated with increased arterial stiffness in ANCA-associated vasculitis. Arthritis Res Ther 2018; 20:194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Yu HT, Youn JC, Kim JH, Seong YJ, Park SH, Kim HC, Lee WW, Park S, Shin EC.. Arterial stiffness is associated with cytomegalovirus-specific senescent CD8(+) T cells. J Am Heart Assoc 2017; 6:e006535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Terrazzini N, Bajwa M, Vita S, Cheek E, Thomas D, Seddiki N, Smith H, Kern F.. A novel cytomegalovirus-induced regulatory-type T-cell subset increases in size during older life and links virus-specific immunity to vascular pathology. J Infect Dis 2014; 209:1382–1392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Kirkham F, Pera A, Simanek AM, Bano A, Morrow G, Reus B, Caserta S, Smith HE, Davies KA, Rajkumar C, Kern F.. Cytomegalovirus infection is associated with an increase in aortic stiffness in older men which may be mediated in part by CD4 memory T-cells. Theranostics 2021; 11:5728–5741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Dumitriu IE, Araguas ET, Baboonian C, Kaski JC.. CD4+ CD28 null T cells in coronary artery disease: when helpers become killers. Cardiovasc Res 2009; 81:11–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Pawelec G, Derhovanessian E, Larbi A, Strindhall J, Wikby A.. Cytomegalovirus and human immunosenescence. Rev Med Virol 2009; 19:47–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Froberg MK, Adams A, Seacotte N, Parker-Thornburg J, Kolattukudy P.. Cytomegalovirus infection accelerates inflammation in vascular tissue overexpressing monocyte chemoattractant protein-1. Circ Res 2001; 89:1224–1230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Jia YJ, Liu J, Han FF, Wan ZR, Gong LL, Liu H, Zhang W, Wardell T, Lv YL, Liu LH.. Cytomegalovirus infection and atherosclerosis risk: a meta-analysis. J Med Virol 2017; 89:2196–2206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Zhu W, Liu S, Liu S.. The role of human cytomegalovirus in atherosclerosis: a systematic review. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai) 2020; 52:339–353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Cristescu CV, Alain S, Ruta SM.. The role of CMV infection in primary lesions, development and clinical expression of atherosclerosis. J Clin Med 2022; 11:3832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Lee S, Affandi J, Waters S, Price P.. Human cytomegalovirus infection and cardiovascular disease: current perspectives. Viral Immunol 2023; 36:13–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Jung SH, Lee K-T, Lee KT.. Atherosclerosis by virus infection—a short review. Biomedicines 2022; 10:2634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Frantzeskaki FG, Karampi ES, Kottaridi C, Alepaki M, Routsi C, Tzanela M, Vassiliadi DA, Douka E, Tsaousi S, Gennimata V, Ilias I, Nikitas N, Armaganidis A, Karakitsos P, Papaevangelou V, Dimopoulou I.. Cytomegalovirus reactivation in a general, nonimmunosuppressed intensive care unit population: incidence, risk factors, associations with organ dysfunction, and inflammatory biomarkers. J Crit Care 2015; 30:276–281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Reinhardt B, Mertens T, Mayr-Beyrle U, Frank H, Luske A, Schierling K, Waltenberger J.. HCMV infection of human vascular smooth muscle cells leads to enhanced expression of functionally intact PDGF beta-receptor. Cardiovasc Res 2005; 67:151–160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. He H, Tan Y, Tang Z, Wang L, Liu S, Wu G.. ADAM9: a regulator between HCMV infection and function of smooth muscle cells. J Med Virol 2023; 95:e28352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Valantine HA, Gao SZ, Menon SG, Renlund DG, Hunt SA, Oyer P, Stinson EB, Brown BW Jr, Merigan TC, Schroeder JS.. Impact of prophylactic immediate posttransplant ganciclovir on development of transplant atherosclerosis: a post hoc analysis of a randomized, placebo-controlled study. Circulation 1999; 100:61–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Zhen J, Zeng M, Zheng X, Qiu H, Cheung BMY, Xu A, Wu J, Li C.. Human cytomegalovirus infection is associated with stroke in women: the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999–2004. Postgrad Med J 2022; 98:172–176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Hamilton EM, Allen NE, Mentzer AJ, Littlejohns TJ.. Human cytomegalovirus and risk of incident cardiovascular disease in United Kingdom Biobank. J Infect Dis 2022; 225:1179–1188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Fagerberg B, Gnarpe J, Gnarpe H, Agewall S, Wikstrand J.. Chlamydia pneumoniae but not cytomegalovirus antibodies are associated with future risk of stroke and cardiovascular disease: a prospective study in middle-aged to elderly men with treated hypertension. Stroke 1999; 30:299–305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Elkind MS, Ramakrishnan P, Moon YP, Boden-Albala B, Liu KM, Spitalnik SL, Rundek T, Sacco RL, Paik MC.. Infectious burden and risk of stroke: the northern Manhattan study. Arch Neurol 2010; 67:33–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Smieja M, Gnarpe J, Lonn E, Gnarpe H, Olsson G, Yi Q, Dzavik V, McQueen M, Yusuf S; Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) Study Investigators. Multiple infections and subsequent cardiovascular events in the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) Study. Circulation 2003; 107:251–257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Fernandez EJ, Lolis E, Lolis E.. Structure, function, and inhibition of chemokines. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 2002; 42:469–499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Singh S, Anshita D, Ravichandiran V.. MCP-1: function, regulation, and involvement in disease. Int Immunopharmacol 2021; 101:107598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Hughes CE, Nibbs RJB.. A guide to chemokines and their receptors. FEBS J 2018; 285:2944–2971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Propper DJ, Balkwill FR, Balkwill FR.. Harnessing cytokines and chemokines for cancer therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2022; 19:237–253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Georgakis MK, Bernhagen J, Heitman LH, Weber C, Dichgans M.. Targeting the CCL2-CCR2 axis for atheroprotection. Eur Heart J 2022; 43:1799–1808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Cao S, Liu M, Sehrawat TS, Shah VH.. Regulation and functional roles of chemokines in liver diseases. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 18:630–647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Progatzky F, Shapiro M, Chng SH, Garcia-Cassani B, Classon CH, Sevgi S, Laddach A, Bon-Frauches AC, Lasrado R, Rahim M, Amaniti EM, Boeing S, Shah K, Entwistle LJ, Suarez-Bonnet A, Wilson MS, Stockinger B, Pachnis V.. Regulation of intestinal immunity and tissue repair by enteric glia. Nature 2021; 599:125–130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Gerard C, Rollins BJ.. Chemokines and disease. Nat Immunol 2001; 2:108–115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Charo IF, Ransohoff RM.. The many roles of chemokines and chemokine receptors in inflammation. N Engl J Med 2006; 354:610–621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Deshmane SL, Kremlev S, Amini S, Sawaya BE.. Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1): an overview. J Interferon Cytokine Res 2009; 29:313–326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Yoshimura T, Robinson EA, Tanaka S, Appella E, Leonard EJ.. Purification and amino acid analysis of two human monocyte chemoattractants produced by phytohemagglutinin-stimulated human blood mononuclear leukocytes. J Immunol 1989; 142:1956–1962. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Standiford TJ, Kunkel SL, Phan SH, Rollins BJ, Strieter RM.. Alveolar macrophage-derived cytokines induce monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 expression from human pulmonary type II-like epithelial cells. J Biol Chem 1991; 266:9912–9918. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Bianconi V, Sahebkar A, Atkin SL, Pirro M.. The regulation and importance of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1. Curr Opin Hematol 2018; 25:44–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Gschwandtner M, Derler R, Midwood KS.. More than just attractive: how CCL2 influences myeloid cell behavior beyond chemotaxis. Front Immunol 2019; 10:2759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Yoshimura T. The chemokine MCP-1 (CCL2) in the host interaction with cancer: a foe or ally? Cell Mol Immunol 2018; 15:335–345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Ling Z, Li W, Hu J, Li Y, Deng M, Zhang S, Ren X, Wu T, Xia J, Cheng B, Tao X.. Targeting CCL2-CCR4 axis suppress cell migration of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cell Death Dis 2022; 13:158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Ford LB, Cerovic V, Milling SW, Graham GJ, Hansell CA, Nibbs RJ.. Characterization of conventional and atypical receptors for the chemokine CCL2 on mouse leukocytes. J Immunol 2014; 193:400–411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Mikolajczyk TP, Szczepaniak P, Vidler F, Maffia P, Graham GJ, Guzik TJ.. Role of inflammatory chemokines in hypertension. Pharmacol Ther 2021; 223:107799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Bush E, Maeda N, Kuziel WA, Dawson TC, Wilcox JN, DeLeon H, Taylor WR.. CC chemokine receptor 2 is required for macrophage infiltration and vascular hypertrophy in angiotensin II-induced hypertension. Hypertension 2000; 36:360–363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Ishibashi M, Hiasa K, Zhao Q, Inoue S, Ohtani K, Kitamoto S, Tsuchihashi M, Sugaya T, Charo IF, Kura S, Tsuzuki T, Ishibashi T, Takeshita A, Egashira K.. Critical role of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 receptor CCR2 on monocytes in hypertension-induced vascular inflammation and remodeling. Circ Res 2004; 94:1203–1210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Chen XL, Tummala PE, Olbrych MT, Alexander RW, Medford RM.. Angiotensin II induces monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 gene expression in rat vascular smooth muscle cells. Circ Res 1998; 83:952–959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Capers Q, Alexander RW, Lou P, De Leon H, Wilcox JN, Ishizaka N, Howard AB, Taylor WR.. Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 expression in aortic tissues of hypertensive rats. Hypertension 1997; 30:1397–1402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Tucci M, Quatraro C, Frassanito MA, Silvestris F.. Deregulated expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) in arterial hypertension: role in endothelial inflammation and atheromasia. J Hypertens 2006; 24:1307–1318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Wang Y, Zhu M, Xu H, Cui L, Liu W, Wang X, Shen S, Wang DH.. Role of the monocyte chemoattractant protein-1/C-C chemokine receptor 2 signaling pathway in transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 ablation-induced renal injury in salt-sensitive hypertension. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2015; 240:1223–1234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Kashyap S, Osman M, Ferguson CM, Nath MC, Roy B, Lien KR, Nath KA, Garovic VD, Lerman LO, Grande JP.. Ccl2 deficiency protects against chronic renal injury in murine renovascular hypertension. Sci Rep 2018; 8:8598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Alsheikh AJ, Dasinger JH, Abais-Battad JM, Fehrenbach DJ, Yang C, Cowley AW Jr, Mattson DL.. CCL2 mediates early renal leukocyte infiltration during salt-sensitive hypertension. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2020; 318:F982–F993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Reed RG, Presnell SR, Al-Attar A, Lutz CT, Segerstrom SC.. Perceived stress, cytomegalovirus titers, and late-differentiated T and NK cells: between-, within-person associations in a longitudinal study of older adults. Brain Behav Immun 2019; 80:266–274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Rector JL, Dowd JB, Loerbroks A, Burns VE, Moss PA, Jarczok MN, Stalder T, Hoffman K, Fischer JE, Bosch JA.. Consistent associations between measures of psychological stress and CMV antibody levels in a large occupational sample. Brain Behav Immun 2014; 38:133–141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Martynowicz H, Janus A, Nowacki D, Mazur G.. The role of chemokines in hypertension. Adv Clin Exp Med 2014; 23:319–325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Bach HH, Wong YM, Tripathi A, Nevins AM, Gamelli RL, Volkman BF, Byron KL, Majetschak M.. Chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor 4 and atypical chemokine receptor 3 regulate vascular alpha(1)-adrenergic receptor function. Mol Med 2014; 20:435–447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]




