Skip to main content
Iranian Journal of Public Health logoLink to Iranian Journal of Public Health
. 2023 Apr;52(4):732–740. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v52i4.12441

Lipid Profile, Renal Function Tests and Inflammatory Markers in Algerian Type 2 Diabetic Patients

Mohammed Hadjari 1,*, Karima Bereksi 2
PMCID: PMC10404330  PMID: 37551187

Abstract

Background:

Several studies show the relationship between chronic hyperglycemia and the appearance of macroangiopathy, microangiopathy and neuropathy. The major objective of this study was to investigate the serum lipids, renal function tests and inflammatory markersin type 2 diabetes patients.

Methods:

The study lasted eight years between Feb-2013 and Mar-2021 (Mascara, Algeria). Overall,197 patients and 197 controls were selected during general medicine examinations; enzymatic and immunoturbidimetric colorimetric methods were used to determine the serum levels offasting glycaemia, total cholesterol, highdensity lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, fibrinogen, urea, acid uric, albumin and creatinine, C protein reactive; the glomerular filtration rate is calculated according to the MDRD equation; the glycatedhaemoglobin levels were determined by an ion-exchange resin separation method.

Results:

Patients had 2.44 times higher fasting glycaemia, 1.71 times higher HbA1c, 1.23 times higher body mass index, 1.30 times higher waist circumference and 1.25times higher systolic blood pressure than control subjects; the findings of the present study also indicate that a significant differences between patients and controls were observed regarding triglycerides (P=0.008), LDL-cholesterol (P=0.011), HDL-cholesterol (P=0.009), urea (P=0.013), uric acid (P=0.015), creatinine (P=0.007), glomerular filtration rate (P=0.006), albumin (P=0.018), fibrinogen (P=0.023) and C protein reactive (P=0.019).

Conclusion:

All this metabolic disordercould facilitate the appearance of serious complications in future.

Keywords: C-reactive protein, Glomerular filtration rate, Serum lipids, Type 2 diabetes

Introduction

Diabetes mellitus is disorder of carbohydrate metabolism characterized by impaired ability of the body to produce or respond to insulin and thereby maintain proper levels of glucose in the blood (1).

Type 2 diabetes mellitus affects 392 million people worldwide (2), 17.7 million Americans (3), 31.7 million Indian (4) and 8.15 million Iranian (5), in Algeria, this disease affects 10.5% of the population (6). The emergence of the non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus is linked to a lifestyle like imbalance diet and physical inactivity (7), also smoking, drink, stress and anxiety (8).

Obesity is a major risk factor for non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, regardless of gender, age or ethnicity (9). Clinical data points to a stronger association of diabetes with android obesity like waist circumference (10) and general obesity as well as weight and body mass index (11, 12).

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a major cause of microvascular disease, (including coronary heart disease and peripheral arterial disease) and microvascular disease (13), (including retinal and renal vascular disease), as well as nerve diseases (14).

Dyslipidemia is one of the main risk factors of cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus (15). The features of diabetic dyslipidemia are hypertriglyceridemia, low HDL cholesterol levels and increased level of small dense LDL-cholesterol particles (16). The lipid changes related with diabetes mellitus are associated to increased free fatty acid flux and insulin resistance (17).

Diabetic nephropathy is one of the leading causes of end-stage renal disease and mortality in type 2 diabetic patients (18). Diabetic nephropathy is characterized by four blood biomarkers that are albumin, urea, uric acid, and creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate (19).

Inflammatory Markers, including C protein reactive and fibrinogen, are increased in subjects with type 2 diabetes (20). Elevated levels of CRP and fibrinogen may be used for early diagnosis of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and can predict chronic diabetic complications (21).

We aimed to investigate the serum lipids, renal function tests and inflammatory markers in Algerian non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus patients compared to control subjects.

Materials and methods

The study lasted eight years between Feb-2013 and Mar-2021 in the Department of General Medicine of Youcef Damardji hospital (Tiaret, Algeria), Meslem Tayeb hospital and Abdellah Ali Boukeroucha hospital (Mascara, Algeria).

The research protocol was validated by the public health officer of cities of Tiaret and Mascara, Algeria according to article 25 of the decree No. 387 of July 31, 2006 on ethical trials. In addition, the purpose of the study was explained to all participants and investigation was carried out with their written consent.

The investigated cohort was selected during general medicine examinations; study subjects were 197 controls who were not suffering from type 2 diabetes mellitus of median age 51± 5.35 yr and 197 volunteers of median age 54 ± 4.08 yr with a confirmed type 2 diabetes mellitus diagnosis for at least since two years and taking antidiuretic medications. The inclusion criteria were subjects aged between 40 and 60 yr of both gender; the type 2 diabetes mellitus was defined according to the WHO(22): A Fasting glycemia: ≥7.00 mmol/L and HbA1c level is ≥6.5%. Patients under lipid-lowering drugs during the investigation, as well as those with hypothyroidism, hepatic dysfunction and gestating woman were excluded from this research.

Anthropometry

Anthropometric indicators were taken in the morning while subjects minimally clothed without shoes. Weight was measured using a digital scale (SECA 869, Germany, Capacity: 250 kg, Graduations: 100 g) and height was measured using a portable stadiometer (SECA 214, Germany; measuring range: 220 cm, graduation: 1 mm). The body mass index (BMI) was then calculated as follows: BMI (kg/m2) = weight (kg)/height2 (m2). Waist circumference (WC) was measured at the midway between iliac crest and lower rib margin, without depressing the skin, using unstretchable tape (SECA 203, measuring range: 200 cm, Graduation: 1 mm), without any pressure to body surface. Blood pressure was measured for all subjects in the study using a standardized mercury sphygmomanometer in the right arm in sitting posture(PIC, Italia).

Lipid and glycemic profile

Venous blood samples were collected 12 h after a nocturnal fast. Enzymatic colorimetric methods (GOD-PAP, Allemagne) were used to determine the serum concentrations of glucose. Theglycatedhaemoglobin(HbA1c) levels were determined by an ion-exchange resin separation method (Spinreact Reagents, Spain). The serum lipidssuch as total cholesterol level, LDL-cholesterol and HDL-cholesterol were determined by the colorimetric enzymatic method with cholesterol esterase, cholesterol oxidase and peroxidase (Biocon, Allmagne). Triglyceride level was quantified by colorimetric enzymatic method with lipase, glycerokinase and glycerophosphate oxidase (Biocon, Allmagne).

Renal function tests and inflammatory markers

Fibrinogen level was determined by the enzymatic method with thrombin (Cypress, Belgique). C protein reactive level (CRP) was quantified by the immunoturbidimetric method (Biolabo, France). Urea level was determined by the kinetic enzymatic technique with urease-GLDH (Biocon, Allmagne). The uric acid level was determined by the enzymatic technique with uricase-peroxidase (Biocon, Allmagne). Albumin was determined by a colorimetric method with bromocresol green (Biolabo, France). The creatinine level was quantified by the reaction of Jaffé with alkaline picrate (Biocon, Allmagne). Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was obtained by the abbreviated MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease study) equation: GFR (ml/min/1.73 m2) = 186.3 × (serum Cr)−1.154 × (age)−0.203 (×0.742 in female) (23).

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed by SPSS software version 15.0 (IBM Corporation; Chicago, IL). Results are expressed as average ± standard deviations. Independent Student’s t-test was used for comparing mean values between the two groups (patient’s vs controls). A P-value lower than 0.05 was considered statistically significant with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI).

Results

Anamnesis

The Table 1 below illustrates some of the main characteristics of the studied population. A significant differences between patients and controls were observed regarding fasting glycaemia (P=0.002), HbA1c (P=0.003), body weight (P=0.005), Body mass index (P=0.019), Waist circumference (P=0.004) and Systolic blood pressure (P=0.036). Whereas, no significant differences were found between type 2 diabetic patients and control subjects regarding Height and Diastolic blood pressure (Table 1).

Table 1:

Anamnesis of the studied population

Characteristics T2DP (n = 197) Controls (n = 197) *P-value

X ± SD 95% CI X ± SD 95% CI
Age (yr) 54 ± 4.08 48 – 57 51 ± 5.35 42 – 55 0.958
Gender ratio (Mens/Women) 99 / 98 99 / 98
Fasting glycaemia (mmol/L) 13.8 ± 1.83 11.05 – 14.03 5.65 ± 0.53 5.02 – 6.11 0.002
HbA1c (%) 10.51 ± 1.35 8.91 – 12.13 6.12 ± 1.02 5.44 – 7.21 0.003
Anthropometry
Body weight (Kg) 80.03 ± 5.64 73.89 – 91.63 67.18 ± 3.71 61.74 – 71.35 0.005
Height (m) 1.61 ± 0.09 1.52 – 1.69 1.64 ± 0.07 1.59 – 1.77 0.827
BMI (Kg/m2) 30.87 ± 3.97 25.89 – 34.54 24.98 ± 1.76 20.06 – 26.19 0.019
WC (cm) 104.16 ± 9.58 82.27 – 109.71 79.61 ± 2.74 78.91 – 96.05 0.004
Blood pressure
SBP (mm Hg) 13.93 ± 0.85 12.97 – 15.43 11.09 ± 1.01 10.32 – 12.21 0.036
DBP (mm Hg) 7.53 ± 0.92 7.46 – 8.78 6,87 ± 1.11 6.82 – 8.05 0.625
*

P-value: Significant difference between type 2 diabetic patients and controls using independent sample Student’s t-test; T2DP: Type 2 diabetic patients; X: Average; SD: Standard deviation; CI: Confidence interval, HbA1c: glycatedhaemoglobin; BMI: Body mass index; WC: Waist circumference; SBP: Systolic blood pressure; DBP: Diastolic blood pressure

Lipid profile

Table 2 presents serum lipids levels. We noted a significant increase in triglycerides and LDL-Cho with 132% and 32%, respectively. However, the results indicate a significant decrease in HDL-Cho with 55% in patients compared to control subjects.

Table 2:

Serum lipids, renal function tests and inflammatory markers of the studied population

Characteristics T2DP (n = 197) Controls (n = 197) *P-value

X ± SD 95% CI X ± SD 95% CI
Serum lipids
Triglycerides (mmol/L) 1.81 ± 0.58 1.52 – 2.03 0.78 ± 0.31 0.69–0.82 0.008
Total cholesterol (mmol/L) 3.36 ± 0.27 3.07 – 3.62 3.34 ± 0.19 3.27 – 3.46 0.972
LDL-Cholesterol (mmol/L) 2.02 ± 0.41 1.74 – 2.36 1.53 ± 0.32 1.41 – 1.66 0.011
HDL-Cholesterol (mmol/L) 0.29 ± 0.08 0.22 – 0.35 0.65 ± 0.12 0.59 – 0.73 0.009
Renal function tests
Urea (mmol/L) 8.11 ± 2.42 7.05 – 8.89 4.91 ± 0.37 4.70 – 5.05 0.013
Uric acid (µmol/L) 351.6 ± 62.07 312.57 – 390.84 219.8 ± 34.63 204.09–237.02 0.015
Creatinine (µmol/L) 139.01 ± 27.53 113.28 – 173.92 74.11 ± 13.17 70.21 – 77.5 0.007
GFR (ml/min) 58.00 ± 12.57 41.55 – 76.01 107.39 ± 37.61 94.67 – 115.58 0.006
Albumin (g/L) 30.94 ± 5.13 23.62 – 41.05 59.17 ± 4.83 58.03 – 66.01 0.018
Inflammatory markers
Fibrinogen (g/L) 1.67 ± 0.34 1.60 – 1.87 1.23 ± 0.19 1.12 – 1.4 0.023
CRP (g/L) 1.42 ± 0.27 1.29 – 1.94 0.87 ± 0.12 0.8 – 0.97 0.019
*

P-value: significant difference between type 2 diabetic patients and controls using independent sample Student’s t-test; T2DP: type 2 diabetic patients; X: average; SD: standard deviation; CI: confidence interval, GFR: Glomerular filtration rate; CRP: C protein reactive

Renal function tests and inflammatory markers

Renal function tests and inflammatory markers are reported in Table 2. The logistic regression analysis shows that type 2 diabetic patients had 1.65 times higher urea, 1.12 times higher uric acid, 1.87 times higher creatinine, 1.35 times higher fibrinogen, 1.63 times higher C reactive protein levels, 1.85 times lower glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and 1.91 times lower albumin than control subjects, which was statistically significant (P<0.05).

Discussion

As mentioned in the literature review, HbA1c level is an indicator of the average blood glucose concentrations over the preceding 2 to 3 months that is recommended by IDF for the diagnosis of diabetes (24). The results of this study showed that patients had 1.71 times higher HbA1c and 2.44 times higher fasting glycaemia than control subjects; these results are consistent with those of other studies and suggest that an increased mortality risk and cardiovascular events are associated with elevated HbA1c levels in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus patients (2528). Patients had an increase in body weight, body mass index and waist circumference; this finding corroborates the ideas that suggested waist circumference and body mass index are predictive of future type 2 diabetes mellitus (29). On the other hand, the systolic blood pressure was significantly greater among the diabetics than the controls; that is 13.93 mm Hg, compared to 11.09 mm Hg. These findings seem to support several studies describing that patients with diabetes mellitus experience increased peripheral artery resistance caused by vascular remodeling and increased body fluid volume associated with insulin resistance-induced hyperinsulinemia and hyperglycemia, both of these mechanisms elevate systolic blood pressure (3033).

We noted a significant increase in triglycerides levels in patients compared to controls. Insulin resistance is the primary mechanism leading to lipid derangements in individuals with diabetes (3436), resistance to insulin increases the release of free fatty acids from adipose tissue, taken up by the liver; increased hepatic uptake of free fatty acids leads to more synthesis of triglycerides (3740). Dyslipidemia observed in patients is related to the increase in LDL-Cholesterol levels (41, 42), however, the HDL-Cholesterol levels is decreased (43, 44), the pattern of dyslipidemia usually presents with elevated triglycerides and small dense LDL and reduced levels of high density lipoprotein cholesterol (4547), small dense LDL particles are more atherogenic and are associated with a higher rate of nephropathy and an elevated risk for cardiovascular disease (4851), individuals with diabetes have also been noted to have lower HDL-Cholesterol levels (5254).

Our results indicated an increase in urea, creatinine and uric acid levels. Moreover, there was a decrease in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and albumin levels, the patients are at risk of kidney failure (nephropathy) (5559), in fact, hyperglycemia play a role in the development of diabetic nephropathy include advanced glycosylation end products (AGEs) (6063). Statistical tests revealed a significant increase in fibrinogen and C reactive protein (CRP) levels in patients compared with controls. In addition, high levels of fibrinogen are associated with obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertriglyceridemia, and a risk of coronary ischemia (6467). On the other hand, the increase of the CRP levels is correlated with atherosclerosis (6870), in fact, CRP can bind to LDL and the complex CRP/LDL activates the phagocytic function of macrophages, the origin of the foam cells during the development of atheroma (7174).

Conclusion

Our work has confirmed a decline in kidney function. While urea, creatinine and uric acid levels were significantly increased, glomerular filtration rate were reduced. Moreover, this study indicated a significant increase in fibrinogen, CRP, triglycerides and LDL-Cholesterol levels but HDL-Cholesterol level was decreased.

We propose to evaluate oxidatif stress in type 2 diabetes mellitus (Oxidant status and Antioxidant status) which represent indicators of appearance of serious complications, in future. For this, the adaptation of a healthy lifestyle by increasing physical activity, weight loss and maintaining a diet rich in plant foods, antioxidants and fiber as Mediterranean diet could provide for the installation of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

Journalism Ethics considerations

Ethical issues (Including plagiarism, informed consent, misconduct, data fabrication and/or falsification, double publication and/or submission, redundancy, etc.) have been completely observed by the authors.

Acknowledgements

Authors want to thank the staff of department of general medicine of Youcef Damardji Hospital (Tiaret) and Meslem Tayeb Hospital (Mascara), especially medical supervisor and staff analysis laboratory for valuable assistance of this study.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1. Defronzo RA, Ferrannini E, Zimmet P, Alberti KGMM, ( 2015). International Textbook of Diabetes Mellitus. 4th ed. Oxford UK: Wiley-Blackwell. 4th ed. Oxford UK: Wiley-Blackwell. Frontmatter - International Textbook of Diabetes Mellitus - Wiley Online Library [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Ogurtsova K, da Rocha Fernandes JD, Huang Y, et al. ( 2017). IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates for the prevalence of diabetes for 2015 and 2040. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 128: 40–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Zimmet P, Alberti KG, Magliano DJ, et al. ( 2016). Diabetes mellitus statistics on prevalence and mortality: facts and fallacies. Nat Rev Endocrinol, 12( 10): 616–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Anjana RM, Deepa M, Pradeepa R, et al. ( 2017). Prevalence of diabetes and prediabetes in 15 states of India: results from the ICMR–INDIAB population-based cross-sectional study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 5( 8): 585–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. World Health Organization ( 2016). Diabetes country profiles. Prevalence of diabetes and related risk factors in Iran. https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/country-profiles/diabetes/irn_en.pdf?sfvrsn=5d4dafb7_38&download=true
  • 6. World Health Organization ( 2016). Diabetes country profiles. Prevalence of diabetes and related risk factors in Algeria. https://www.who.int/teams/noncommunicable-diseases/surveillance/data/diabetes-profiles
  • 7. Dunkler D, Kohl M, Heinze G, et al. ( 2015). Modifiable lifestyle and social factors affect chronic kidney disease in high-risk individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Kidney Int, 87( 4): 784–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Staplin N, Haynes R, Herrington WG, et al. ( 2016). Smoking and adverse outcomes in patients with CKD: the Study of Heart and Renal Protection (SHARP). Am J Kidney Dis, 68( 3): 371–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Volaco A, Cavalcanti AM, Précoma DB. ( 2018). Socioeconomic status: the missing link between obesity and diabetes mellitus? Curr Diabetes Rev, 14( 4): 321–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. German CA, Laughey B, Bertoni AG, et al. ( 2020). Associations between BMI, waist circumference, central obesity and outcomes in type II diabetes mellitus: The ACCORD Trial. J Diabetes Complications, 34 (3): 107499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Chen MQ, Shi WR, Wang HY, et al. ( 2021). Interaction of General or Central Obesity and Hypertension on Diabetes: Sex-Specific Differences in a Rural Population in Northeast China. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes, 14: 1061–1072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Ting MK, Liao PJ, Wu IW, et al. ( 2018). Predicting type 2 diabetes mellitus occurrence using three-dimensional anthropometric body surface scanning measurements: a prospective cohort study. J Diabetes Res, 2018: 6742384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Chawla A, Chawla R, Jaggi S. ( 2016). Microvasular and macrovascular complications in diabetes mellitus: distinct or continuum? Indian J Endocrinol Metab, 20( 4): 546– 51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Shi Y, Vanhoutte PM. ( 2017). Macro- and microvascular endothelial dysfunction in diabetes. J Diabetes, 9( 5): 434–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Sunil B, Ashraf AP. ( 2020). Dyslipidemia in pediatric type 2 diabetes mellitus. Curr Diab Rep, 20 (10): 53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Găman MA, Cozma MA, Dobrică EC, et al. ( 2020). Dyslipidemia: a trigger for coronary heart disease in Romanian patients with diabetes. Metabolites, 10 (5): 195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Bello-Ovosi BO, Ovosi JO, Ogunsina MA, et al. ( 2019). Prevalence and pattern of dyslipidemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Zaria, Northwestern Nigeria. Pan Afr Med J, 34: 123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Zhang XX, Kong J, Yun K. ( 2020). Prevalence of diabetic nephropathy among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in China: a meta-analysis of observational studies. J Diabetes Res, 2020: 2315607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Song KH, Jeong JS, Kim MK, et al. ( 2019). Discordance in risk factors for the progression of diabetic retinopathy and diabetic nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Investig, 10( 3): 745–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Elimam H, Abdulla AM, Taha IM. ( 2019). Inflammatory markers and control of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab Syndr, 13( 1): 800–804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Bao X, Borné Y, Johnson L, et al. ( 2018). Comparing the inflammatory profiles for incidence of diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular diseases: a prospective study exploring the ‘common soil’hypothesis. Cardiovasc Diabetol, 17( 1): 87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. World Health Organization ( 1999). Definition, Diagnosis, and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus and Its Complications: Report of a WHO Consultation. Part 1: Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Geneva, World Health Organization. [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Levey AS, Coresh J, Balk E, et al. ( 2003). National Kidney Foundation Practice Guidelines for Chronic Kidney Disease: Evaluation, Classification, and Stratification. Ann Intern Med, 139( 2): 137–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Sanz M, Ceriello A, Buysschaert, et al. ( 2018). Scientific evidence on the links between periodontal diseases and diabetes: Consensus report and guidelines of the joint workshop on periodontal diseases and diabetes by the International Diabetes Federation and the European Federation of Periodontology. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 137: 231–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Walraven I, Mast MR, Hoekstra T, et al. ( 2015). Distinct HbA1c trajectories in a type 2 diabetes cohort. Acta Diabetol, 52( 2): 267–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Parry HM, Deshmukh H, Levin D, et al. ( 2015). Both high and low HbA1c predict incident heart failure in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Circ Heart Fail, 8( 2): 236–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Vijayakumar P, Nelson RG, Hanson RL, et al. ( 2017). HbA1c and the prediction of type 2 diabetes in children and adults. Diabetes Care, 40( 1): 16–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Skriver MV, Sandbæk A, Kristensen JK, et al. ( 2015). Relationship of HbA1c variability, absolute changes in HbA1c, and all-cause mortality in type 2 diabetes: a Danish population-based prospective observational study. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care, 3 (1): e000060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Luo J, Hendryx M, Laddu D, et al. ( 2019). Racial and ethnic differences in anthropometric measures as risk factors for diabetes. Diabetes Care, 42( 1): 126–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Wagnew F, Eshetie S, Kibret GD, et al. ( 2018). Diabetic nephropathy and hypertension in diabetes patients of sub-Saharan countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Res Notes, 11 (1): 565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Tsimihodimos V, Gonzalez-Villalpando C, Meigs JB, et al. ( 2018). Hypertension and diabetes mellitus: coprediction and time trajectories. Hypertension, 71( 3): 422–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Alloubani A, Saleh A, Abdelhafiz I. ( 2018). Hypertension and diabetes mellitus as a predictive risk factors for stroke. Diabetes Metab Syndr, 12( 4): 577–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Jia G, Sowers JR. ( 2021). Hypertension in Diabetes: An Update of Basic Mechanisms and Clinical Disease. Hypertension, 78( 5): 1197–205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Brunzell JD. ( 2007). Clinical practice, Hypertriglyceridemia. N Engl J Med, 357( 10): 1009–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Heidemann C. ( 2011). Dietary patterns are associated with cardiometabolic risk factors in a representative study population of German adults. Br J Nutr, 106( 8): 1253–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Chehade JM, Gladysz M, Mooradian AD. ( 2013). Dyslipidemia in type 2 diabetes: prevalence, pathophysiology, and management. Drugs, 73( 4): 327–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Adiels M, Boren J, Caslake MJ, et al. ( 2005). Overproduction of VLDL1 driven by hyperglycemia is a dominant feature of diabetic dyslipidemia. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, 25( 8): 1697–703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Gonzalez-Baro MR, Lewin TM, Coleman RA. ( 2007). Regulation of Triglyceride Metabolism: Function of mitochondrial GPAT1 in the regulation of triacylglycerol biosynthesis and insulin action. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, 292( 5): G1195–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Akhtar DH, Iqbal U, Vazquez-Montesino LM, et al. ( 2019). Pathogenesis of insulin resistance and atherogenic dyslipidemia in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Clin Transl Hepatol, 7( 4): 362–370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Bjornstad P, Eckel RH. ( 2018). Pathogenesis of lipid disorders in insulin resistance: a brief review. Curr Diab Rep, 18 (12): 127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Grundy SM. ( 2006). Atherogenic dyslipidemia associated with metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance. Clin Cornerstone, 8 Suppl 1: S21– 7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Schofield JD, Liu Y, Rao-Balakrishna P, et al. ( 2016). Diabetes dyslipidemia. Diabetes Ther, 7( 2): 203–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Mooradian AD. ( 2009). Dyslipidemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab, 5( 3): 150–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Wu Z, Huang Z, Lichtenstein AH, et al. ( 2021). Different associations between HDL cholesterol and cardiovascular diseases in people with diabetes mellitus and people without diabetes mellitus: a prospective community-based study. Am J Clin Nutr, 114( 3): 907–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Warraich HJ, Wong ND, Rana JS. ( 2015). Role for combination therapy in diabetic dyslipidemia. Curr Cardiol Rep, 17( 5): 1–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Kikkawa K, Nakajima K, Shimomura Y, et al. ( 2015). Small dense LDL cholesterol measured by homogeneous assay in Japanese healthy controls, metabolic syndrome and diabetes patients with or without a fatty liver. Clin Chim Acta, 438: 70–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Jin JL, Zhang HW, Cao YX, et al. ( 2020). Association of small dense low-density lipoprotein with cardiovascular outcome in patients with coronary artery disease and diabetes: a prospective, observational cohort study. Cardiovasc Diabetol, 19 (1): 45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Warraich HJ, Rana JS. ( 2017). Dyslipidemia in diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease. Cardiovasc Endocrinol, 6( 1): 27–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Kim CJ. ( 2013). Management of hypertriglyceridemia for prevention of cardiovascular diseases. J Lipid Atheroscler, 2( 2): 53–60. [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Nikolic D, Giglio RV, Rizvi AA, et al. ( 2021). Liraglutide reduces carotid intima-media thickness by reducing small dense low-density lipoproteins in a real-world setting of patients with type 2 diabetes: A novel anti-atherogenic effect. Diabetes Ther, 12: 261–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Sobenin IA, Galitsyna EV, Grechko AV, et al. ( 2017). Small dense and desialylated low density lipoprotein in diabetic patients. Vessel Plus, 1: 29–37. [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Jaiswal M, Schinske A, Pop-Busui R. ( 2014). Lipids and lipid management in diabetes. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab, 28( 3): 325–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Betteridge DJ. ( 2011). Lipid control in patients with diabetes mellitus. Nat Rev Cardiol, 8( 5): 278–290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Haase CL, Tybjærg-Hansen A, Nordestgaard BG, et al. ( 2015). HDL cholesterol and risk of type 2 diabetes: a Mendelian randomization study. Diabetes, 64( 9): 3328–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Gross JL, De Azevedo MJ, Silveiro SP, et al. ( 2005). Diabetic nephropathy: diagnosis, prevention, and treatment. Diabetes Care, 28( 1): 164–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Gagliardi AC, Miname MH, Santos RD. ( 2009). Uric acid: A marker of increased cardiovascular risk. Atherosclerosis, 202( 1): 11–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Stevens LA, Coresh J, Greene T, et al. ( 2006). Assessing kidney function—measured and estimated glomerular filtration rate. N Engl J Med, 354( 23): 2473–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Zhuo L, Zou G, Li W, et al. ( 2013). Prevalence of diabetic nephropathy complicating non-diabetic renal disease among Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Eur J Med Res, 18( 1): 4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Chen J, Muntner P, Hamm LL. ( 2004). The metabolic syndrome and chronic kidney disease in U.S. adults. Ann Intern Med, 140( 3): 167–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Vinod PB. ( 2012). Pathophysiology of diabetic nephropathy. Clin Nephrol, 1( 2): 121–26. [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Kanwar YS, Wada J, Sun L, et al. ( 2008). Diabetic nephropathy: mechanisms of renal disease progression. Exp Biol Med (Maywood), 233( 1): 4–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Thorn LM, Forsblom J, Fagerudd MC, et al. ( 2005). Groop : Metabolic syndrome in type 1 diabetes : association with diabetic nephropathy and glycemic control (the FinnDiane study). Diabetes Care, 28( 8): 2019–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Czajka A, Malik AN. ( 2016). Hyperglycemia induced damage to mitochondrial respiration in renal mesangial and tubular cells: Implications for diabetic nephropathy. Redox Biol, 10: 100–107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Navarro-González JF, Mora-Fernández C, De Fuentes MM, et al. ( 2011). Inflammatory molecules and pathways in the pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy. Nat Rev Nephrol, 7( 6): 327–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Schneider DJ. ( 2005). Abnormalities of coagulation, platelet function, and fibrinolysis associated with syndromes of insulin resistance. Coron Artery Dis, 16( 8): 473–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Ang L, Palakodeti V, Khalid A, et al. ( 2008). Elevated plasma fibrinogen and diabetes mellitus are associated with lower inhibition of platelet reactivity with clopidogrel. J Am Coll Cardiol, 52( 13): 1052–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Zhang J, Wang Y, Zhang R, et al. ( 2018). Serum fibrinogen predicts diabetic ESRD in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 141: 1–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Lee CC, Adler AI, Sandhu MS, et al. ( 2009). Association of C-reactive protein with type 2 diabetes: prospective analysis and meta-analysis. Diabetologia, 52( 6): 1040–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Koenig W. ( 2005). Predicting risk and treatment benefit in atherosclerosis: the role of Creactive protein. Int J Cardiol, 98( 2): 199–206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Ebrahimi M, Heidari, Bakavoli AR, Shoeibi S, et al. ( 2016). Association of serum hs-CRP levels with the presence of obesity, diabetes mellitus, and other cardiovascular risk factors. J Clin Lab Anal, 30( 5): 672–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Verhagen SN, Wassink AM, Graaf Y, et al. ( 2013). C-reactive protein and incident diabetes in patients with arterial disease. Eur J Clin Invest, 43( 10): 1052–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Cheng L, Zhuang H, Yang S, et al. ( 2018). Exposing the causal effect of C-reactive protein on the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a Mendelian randomization study. Front Genet, 9: 657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Parrinello CM, Lutsey PL, Ballantyne CM, et al. ( 2015). Six-year change in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and risk of diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and mortality. Am Heart J, 170( 2): 380–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Tutuncu Y, Satman I, Celik S, et al. ( 2016). A comparison of hs-CRP levels in new diabetes groups diagnosed based on FPG, 2-hPG, or HbA1c criteria. J Diabetes Res, 2016: 5827041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Iranian Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of Tehran University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES