Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2023 Jul 7;15(7):e41534. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41534

Assessing the Inflow Segment of a Hemodialysis Access: The Fogarty Balloon Occlusion Technique

Mona J Malik 1,, Rema J Nabi 2
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC10404460  PMID: 37551204

Abstract

Dialysis access maintenance often requires a fistulogram or shuntogram of arteriovenous access. Assessment of the arterial inflow segment and arterial anastomosis is often a critical portion of the procedure. Retrograde occlusive angiography (ROA) is often used to properly assess the inflow. Manual compression using finger compression or a hemostat is often described in the literature. The Fogarty balloon occlusion technique using a 4-Fr Fogarty catheter balloon (Henry Shein) is a simple and cost-effective method that preserves image quality and decreases radiation exposure in retrograde occlusive angiography.

Keywords: vascular surgery, fistulogram, arteriovenous access, graft, fistula, dialysis access

Introduction

The preservation of functional vascular access in patients on hemodialysis can be quite challenging for the healthcare team. Performing a fistulogram is a crucial step before an intervention is carried out to salvage hemodialysis access. In addition to assessing the outflow segment of the fistula or graft, it is important to visualize arterial anastomosis and inflow segments during the fistulogram. Retrograde occlusive angiography (ROA) is commonly used to depict the inflow segment of the arteriovenous fistula (AVF) or graft (AVG) [1,2]. ROA can be performed by manually compressing the outflow segment or occluding the outflow segment with a 4-Fr Fogarty catheter balloon (Henry Shein) while injecting the contrast. The manual occlusion technique is more commonly used and discussed in the literature [3]. The purpose of this article is to describe the balloon occlusion technique and highlight its advantages.

Technical report

The patient is placed in the supine position with the arm of interest extended on a surgical table. The patient is sedated by the anesthetist, and local anesthesia is administered. Access to the fistula or graft is obtained, and the outflow component of the dialysis circuit is investigated with angiography in a routine fashion (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Fistulogram with the assessment of venous outflow.

Figure 1

After obtaining images of the complete venous outflow, a contrast-filled (with 50% saline/contrast) 4-Fr Fogarty balloon catheter attached to a three-way stop cock is inserted into the fistula (Figure 2).

Figure 2. 4-Fr Fogarty balloon catheter attached to a three-way stop cock.

Figure 2

The balloon is inflated to occlude the venous outflow tract (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Fogarty balloon inflated to occlude the venous outflow tract.

Figure 3

The contrast is injected, and there is a reflux of contrast into the inflow segment. The anastomotic and inflow/arterial segments of the AVG/AVF are assessed (Figure 4).

Figure 4. Arterial inflow segment evaluation (arrow).

Figure 4

During the manual occlusion technique, manual pressure is applied to the fistula or graft, and when released, it will provide arterial inflow imaging that serves as a road map for interventions.

Balloon occlusion may serve as a very valuable asset in maintaining a road map during coil embolization of the branches and aneurysm repair in dialysis access procedures (Figures 5, 6).

Figure 5. Retrograde angiography with balloon occlusion of the venous outflow segment with delineation of aneurysm in the arterial inflow segment.

Figure 5

Figure 6. Road map being used to treat the aneurysmal segment with stent graft.

Figure 6

A decision is then made on the specific type of interventional procedure to be performed. Once the intervention has been performed, a completion fistulogram is carried out. After the fistulogram, the sheath and the catheter are removed. Hemostasis is achieved in a standard fashion.

Discussion

A diagnostic fistulogram should be completed from the arterial inflow segment to the right atrium to fully evaluate the AVG or AVF before performing an intervention. Problems associated with the arterial/inflow and anastomotic segment are responsible for a significant proportion of AVFs and AVGs dysfunction [4,5]. Stenosis along the arterial limb may coexist with stenosis involving the venous limb and may be overlooked if the arterial inflow is not assessed. The techniques used in delineating the inflow segment of an AVG/AVF include direct arteriography (DA) and retrograde occlusive angiography (ROA). In DA, the inflow segment is depicted by injection of contrast following a direct arterial puncture. DA is associated with a high risk of complications [6]. Complications associated with DA include arterial thrombosis, hand ischemia, hematoma, nerve injuries, and spasm [1,7]. In ROA, the venous limb/graft is cannulated, and the inflow segment is depicted by reflux of injected contrast following temporary occlusion of the outflow tract. ROA has been associated with complications such as vessel spasms and vessel dilatation. Chan et al. [8] reported that ROA may fail to identify some inflow lesions. In ROA, the outflow segment can be occluded by extrinsic (manual) compression or by balloon occlusion. Extrinsic compression is the technique traditionally used by most vascular surgeons, and most of the literature on ROA discusses solely the extrinsic compression technique. The balloon occlusion technique has some advantages over extrinsic compression; it is, therefore, imperative to discuss these advantages.

With the manual compression technique, the operator may be exposed to more radiation as he uses his hand to compress the outflow segment during the fistulogram [2]. This risk is reduced in the balloon occlusion technique since manual compression is not needed. The issue of radiation exposure and attenuation is of significant concern among vascular surgeons. It is recommended that every approach to reduce radiation exposure be implemented meticulously [9]. Heye et al. [10] noted that the position of the operator’s hand relative to the X-ray tube was the major determinant of the dose of radiation exposure.

The other option for attenuating radiation exposure to the operator would be the use of lead gloves. It is, however, interesting to note that the unit price of a Fogarty balloon catheter is about $30, while the price for a pair of lead gloves used in manual compression costs about $80, thus making the balloon occlusion technique a relatively cheaper alternative barring other costs. While the unit price difference may not be overly significant, the importance of cost-effective treatment models cannot be overemphasized in this era. Vascular access maintenance including diagnostic and therapeutic procedures constitutes a significant portion of the healthcare costs of patients on hemodialysis [11-13].

Conclusions

Extrinsic compression of the venous outflow limb is the traditional approach for retrograde occlusive angiography. This method has been used to assess the arterial inflow limb of the arteriovenous fistula or graft in dialysis maintenance procedures. We present a simple new technique utilizing Fogarty balloon occlusion that minimizes radiation exposure and is a safe, cost-effective, and more efficient alternative for the assessment of arterial inflow in dialysis maintenance procedures.

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Human Ethics

Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study

Animal Ethics

Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue.

References

  • 1.Transradial approach for percutaneous intervention of malfunctioning arteriovenous accesses. Le L, Brooks A, Donovan M, Smith TA, Sternbergh WC 3rd, Bazan HA. J Vasc Surg. 2015;61:747–753. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kandarpa K, Machan L. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011. Handbook of interventional radiologic procedures, fourth edition. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Retrograde angiography and the risk of arteriovenous fistula perforation. Salman L, Asif A, Beathard GA. Semin Dial. 2009;22:698–701. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2009.00648.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Aggressive treatment of early fistula failure. Beathard GA, Arnold P, Jackson J, Litchfield T. Kidney Int. 2003;64:1487–1494. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00210.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Inflow stenosis in arteriovenous fistulas and grafts: a multicenter, prospective study. Asif A, Gadalean FN, Merrill D, Cherla G, Cipleu CD, Epstein DL, Roth D. Kidney Int. 2005;67:1986–1992. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00299.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Retrograde catheterization of haemodialysis fistulae and grafts: angiographic depiction of the entire vascular access tree and stenosis treatment. Duijm LE, Overbosch EH, Liem YS, et al. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009;24:539–547. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfn526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Imaging in vascular access. Murphy EA, Ross RA, Jones RG, et al. Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2017;8:255–272. doi: 10.1007/s13239-017-0317-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Retrograde occlusive arteriography of hemodialysis access: failure to detect inflow lesions? Chan MR, Chhokar VS, Young HN, Becker BN, Yevzlin AS. Semin Dial. 2011;24:452–455. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2010.00761.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Radiation exposure to eye lens and operator hands during endovascular procedures in hybrid operating rooms. Attigah N, Oikonomou K, Hinz U, Knoch T, Demirel S, Verhoeven E, Böckler D. J Vasc Surg. 2016;63:198–203. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.08.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Occupational radiation dose: percutaneous interventional procedures on hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas and grafts. Heye S, Maleux G, Oyen RH, Claes K, Kuypers DR. Radiology. 2012;264:278–284. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12110978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cost analysis of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis access in incident dialysis patients. Coentrão LA, Araújo CS, Ribeiro CA, Dias CC, Pestana MJ. Perit Dial Int. 2013;33:662–670. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2011.00309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Medicare reimbursement policies and hemodialysis vascular access outcomes: a need for change. Allon M, Dinwiddie L, Lacson E Jr, Latos DL, Lok CE, Steinman T, Weiner DE. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;22:426–430. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2010121219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Establishment and maintenance of vascular access in incident hemodialysis patients: a prospective cost analysis. Manns B, Tonelli M, Yilmaz S, et al. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16:201–209. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2004050355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES