Skip to main content
The British Journal of Ophthalmology logoLink to The British Journal of Ophthalmology
. 1984 Oct;68(10):756–759. doi: 10.1136/bjo.68.10.756

Contrast sensitivity measurements in acute and resolved optic neuritis.

R W Beck, M C Ruchman, P J Savino, N J Schatz
PMCID: PMC1040460  PMID: 6477856

Abstract

We measured contrast sensitivity by means of Arden grating plates in 41 eyes with acute optic neuritis and in 51 eyes with resolved optic neuritis. The scores were abnormal in 93% of eyes in the acute phase and 78% in the resolved phase irrespective of visual acuity. Even when acuity improved to 6/7.5 or better with resolution of the neuritis, 67% of eyes still showed abnormal contrast sensitivity. Since Snellen acuity represents just one point at the high spatial frequency end of the contrast sensitivity function, a patient in whom acuity improves to 6/6 with resolution of optic neuritis may still have difficulty seeing objects of lower relative contrast or at lower spatial frequencies.

Full text

PDF
756

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arden G. B., Gucukoglu A. G. Grating test of contrast sensitivity in patients with retrobulbar neuritis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1978 Sep;96(9):1626–1629. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1978.03910060260015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arden G. B. The importance of measuring contrast sensitivity in cases of visual disturbance. Br J Ophthalmol. 1978 Apr;62(4):198–209. doi: 10.1136/bjo.62.4.198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bodis-Wollner I., Diamond S. P. The measurement of spatial contrast sensitivity in cases of blurred vision associated with cerebral lesions. Brain. 1976 Dec;99(4):695–710. doi: 10.1093/brain/99.4.695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Campbell F. W., Green D. G. Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution. J Physiol. 1965 Dec;181(3):576–593. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hess R. F., Howell E. R. The threshold contrast sensitivity function in strabismic amblyopia: evidence for a two type classification. Vision Res. 1977;17(9):1049–1055. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(77)90009-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hess R. F., Plant G. T. The effect of temporal frequency variation on threshold contrast sensitivity deficits in optic neuritis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1983 Apr;46(4):322–330. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.46.4.322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kupersmith M. J., Nelson J. I., Seiple W. H., Carr R. E., Weiss P. A. The 20/20 eye in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 1983 Aug;33(8):1015–1020. doi: 10.1212/wnl.33.8.1015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kupersmith M. J., Siegel I. M., Carr R. E. Subtle disturbances of vision with compressive lesions of the anterior visual pathway measured by contrast sensitivity. Ophthalmology. 1982 Jan;89(1):68–72. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(82)34864-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Regan D., Silver R., Murray T. J. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in multiple sclerosis--hidden visual loss: an auxiliary diagnostic test. Brain. 1977 Sep;100(3):563–579. doi: 10.1093/brain/100.3.563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wolkstein M., Atkin A., Bodis-Wollner I. Contrast sensitivity in retinal disease. Ophthalmology. 1980 Nov;87(11):1140–1149. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(80)35112-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Zimmern R. L., Campbell F. W., Wilkinson I. M. Subtle disturbances of vision after optic neuritis elicited by studying contrast sensitivity. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1979 May;42(5):407–412. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.42.5.407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES