Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2023 Aug 7;18(8):e0289715. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289715

Concurrent exercise training induces additional benefits to hydrochlorothiazide: Evidence for an improvement of autonomic control and oxidative stress in a model of hypertension and postmenopause

Maycon Junior Ferreira 1, Michel Pablo dos Santos Ferreira Silva 2, Danielle da Silva Dias 3,4, Nathalia Bernardes 5, Maria Claudia Irigoyen 3, Kátia De Angelis 1,2,*
Editor: Michael Bader6
PMCID: PMC10406179  PMID: 37549182

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate whether exercise training could contribute to a better modulation of the neurohumoral mechanisms linked to the pathophysiology of arterial hypertension (AH) in postmenopausal hypertensive rats treated with hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ).

Methods

Female spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) (150−200g, 90 days old) were distributed into 5 hypertensive groups (n = 7–8 rats/group): control (C), ovariectomized (O), ovariectomized treated with HCTZ (OH), ovariectomized submitted to exercise training (OT) and ovariectomized submitted to exercise training and treated with HCTZ (OTH). Ovarian hormone deprivation was performed through bilateral ovariectomy. HCTZ (30mg/kg/day) and concurrent exercise training (3d/wk) were conducted lasted 8 weeks. Arterial pressure (AP) was directly recorded. Cardiac effort was evaluated using the rate-pressure product (RPP = systolic AP x heart rate). Vasopressin V1 receptor antagonist, losartan and hexamethonium were sequentially injected to evaluate the vasopressor systems. Inflammation and oxidative stress were evaluated in cardiac tissue.

Results

In addition to the reduction in AP, trained groups improved RPP, AP variability, bradycardic (OT: −1.3 ± 0.4 and OTH: −1.6 ± 0.3 vs. O: −0.6 ± 0.3 bpm/mmHg) and tachycardic responses of baroreflex sensitivity (OT: −2.4 ± 0.8 and OTH: −2.4 ± 0.8 vs. O: −1.3 ± 0.5 bpm/mmHg), NADPH oxidase and IL-10/TNF-α ratio. Hexamethonium injection revealed reduced sympathetic contribution on basal AP in OTH group (OTH: −49.8 ± 12.4 vs. O: −74.6 ± 18.1 mmHg). Furthermore, cardiac sympathovagal balance (LF/HF ratio), IL-10 and antioxidant enzymes were enhanced in OTH group. AP variability and baroreflex sensitivity were correlated with systolic AP, RPP, LF/HF ratio and inflammatory and oxidative stress parameters.

Conclusion

The combination of HCTZ plus concurrent exercise training induced additional positive adaptations in cardiovascular autonomic control, inflammation and redox balance in ovariectomized SHR. Therefore, combining exercise and medication may represent a promising strategy for managing classic and remaining cardiovascular risks in AH.

Introduction

Arterial hypertension (AH) is a chronic, complex and multifactorial disease [1] that can help to a disabling outcome if not well treated. The prevalence of AH increases throughout life and affects both sexes, but it is significantly higher in females after menopause. It is estimated that half of hypertensive women who are treated do not have AH under control [2]. Strategies to better treat AH has been intensively adopted over the decades and has impacted on a reduction in cardiovascular mortality in the last years [3]. However, the proper long-term control of the arterial pressure (AP) is still challenging [2, 4].

It is recognized the interplay between autonomic nervous system, inflammation, oxidative stress, and AH. Inflammation and oxidative stress exert joint effects on the central nervous system, increasing sympathetic activity. This activity, in turn, contributes to tissue inflammation, resulting in increased AP [5]. Clinical studies has demonstrated increase in pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) [6] and interleukin 6 (IL-6) [7], with the severity of AH. In addition, we [8] and other authors [9] have reported elevated TNF-α [8, 9] and oxidative stress [8] in an experimental model of AH. On the other hand, interleukin 10 (IL-10), an anti-inflammatory cytokine, has been suggested to counterbalance the pro-inflammatory effects. Importantly, the IL-10/TNF-α ratio has been reported as a physiological parameter in mediating oxidative-stress-induced cardiac injury [10]. Moreover, we have previously demonstrated that ovarian hormone deprivation exacerbates the deleterious effects in the experimental AH [8].

The main goal of antihypertensive therapy is to keep AP well controlled. Diuretic are a common and effective therapy for AH, and they have been shown to reduce cardiovascular events [11]. The hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), a thiazide diuretic, has been one of the antihypertensive classes considered preferred in monotherapy for AP control [12], being widely used in clinical practice. Diuretic-induced natriuresis promote hypotensive effect, in which there is a reduction in the reabsorption of sodium chloride in the renal distal tubules. However, the decrease in peripheral vascular resistance appears to be determinant for long-term hypotension [13], corroborating with the potent vasodilatation effect induced by HCTZ on vascular smooth muscle cell [14].

Evidence suggests that long-term diuretic treatment has no positive effects on mechanisms related to the pathophysiology of AH. Chronic administration of diuretic could active counter-regulatory mechanisms, thus inducing maintenance or even increase in sympathetic activity and in norepinephrine [15, 16], as well as, stimulating the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) [17, 18]. Additionally, data suggested that thiazide diuretic have a diabetogenic potential by aggravate metabolic dysfunction [19]. In this sense, even with a controlled AP, there is remaining cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients.

On the other hand, the use of exercise training as a non-pharmacological approach is documented and strongly recommended to management of the AH [12, 20]. Recent meta-analysis has showed that the combination of aerobic and resistance exercises performed in close periods, termed concurrent exercise training (CET), shown similar potential to aerobic exercise in reduce AP [21]. Importantly, exercise training was associated with adaptations in key AP control mechanisms such as autonomic, humoral, inflammation, and oxidative stress [8, 2224]. In this sense, we previously reported an improvement in baroreflex sensitivity after exercise training [8, 23] related with increased sensitivity of afferent and/or efferent pathways [25] and vascular adaptations [26]. Moreover, exercise training is widely recognized to induce a sympathoinhibitory effect in AH in clinical and experimental studies [8, 27]. In addition, the observed increase in autonomic modulation in trained female SHR has been reflected in an improvement in inflammatory and in the oxidative stress profile, contributing to reduction in target organ damage [8, 22]. However, despite this evidence, the effects of the CET in association with HCTZ in the condition of menopause and hypertension are unknown.

Therefore, considering that counter-regulatory mechanisms act to restore AP levels prior to drug therapy [1518], we investigated whether the association of exercise training during HCTZ treatment could play a role in the modulation of cardiovascular and autonomic mechanisms, as well as inflammatory and oxidative stress markers in relation to monotherapy alone in hypertensive female rats subjected to ovarian hormone deprivation. In this sense, in addition to a better adjustment of mechanisms, the combination of approaches in AH could result in reduction in the long-term remaining risk.

Materials and methods

Female spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) (150−200g, 90 days old) were obtained from Nove de Julho University (UNINOVE) (Sao Paulo, Brazil) and randomly allocated into 5 hypertensive groups (n = 7−8 rats each group): control (C), ovariectomized (O), ovariectomized treated with HCTZ (OH), ovariectomized submitted to exercise training (OT) and ovariectomized submitted to exercise training and treated with HCTZ (OTH). The rats were housed in cages (2–4 animals) in a temperature-controlled room (22−25°C) under a 12−hour dark/light cycle. Chow and water were offered ad libitum. The rat that did not complete a specific evaluation was excluded from the statistical analysis. Ethics Committee on the Use of Animals (CEUA) of Federal University of Sao Paulo (UNIFESP) (protocol n° 7611290618) approved the study and all surgical procedures and protocols were conducted in according with the recommendations.

Ovariectomy

The rats were ovariectomized at 90 days of age as described previously [28]. Only the C group was not subjected to ovariectomy. The detailed procedure can be found in the S1 File.

Pharmacological treatment

Pharmacological treatment was performed using HCTZ (Sanofi Medley Farmacêutica, Campinas, SP, Brazil), an antihypertensive drug corresponding to thiazide diuretics class [12], at a dose of 30 mg/kg/day. According to our pilot study conducted previously, this dose during 1 week showed sufficient to promote an AP reduction of approximately 10−12 mmHg in ovariectomized SHR.

The dose of HCTZ chosen in our study was selected with the aim of promoting AP reductions similar to the proposed exercise training. Thus, the pairing of the hypotensive effect between the approaches allows us to accurately assess which mechanisms (among those we evaluated) could be more benefited by HCTZ, exercise training and/or the combination of approaches.

The HCTZ tablet was macerated, diluted in drinking (filtered) water, and then was made available for consumption. Started on the same day as the first indirect AP measurement (i.e., one week after ovariectomy), all groups that would be treated with HCTZ underwent a 7−day adaptation period with the drug. Filtered water was consumed by the other groups that did not undergo pharmacological treatment during the entire adaptation period, as well as during the entire experimental protocol. Pharmacological treatment was continued for 8 weeks after the adaptation period. The daily consumption was monitored and then considered to adjust the amount of water for the groups undergo to the drug treatment.

Tail-cuff plethysmography

All rats underwent tail plethysmography measurement in 4 moments of the study: baseline, after 7 days of medication adaptation (beginning of the intervention period), and at fourth and eighth weeks of the intervention period. Twenty consecutive and uninterrupted measurements were performed; during each assessment, with an interval of 15 seconds between each measurement, systolic arterial pressure (SAP) values ​​were recorded (model BP-2000 Blood Pressure Analysis System, Visitech Systems, Inc, North Carolina, USA). The complete procedure is described in S1 File.

Concurrent exercise training protocol

CET was performed on a motorized treadmill (aerobic exercise) and ladder adapted for rats (resistance exercise) for 3 days a week, on alternate days, for 8 weeks. Initially, all animals were adapted to the aerobic (0.3 km/h, 10 minutes) and resistance exercises (3 climbs without external overload) for 3 − 5 consecutive days. After that, they were submitted to a maximal running and maximal load tests, on different days, for the prescription of exercise training and determination of the maximal capacity of all groups. The details of this protocol are available in S1 File.

Hemodynamic and cardiac functional assessment

On the last day of the protocol, rats were anesthetized and two polyethylene-tipped Tygon cannulas were implanted: into the carotid artery toward the left ventricle for direct AP recording and in the jugular vein for drug infusion, respectively.

Hemodynamic measurements were taken in conscious and awake rats in their cages, at least 24 hours after catheter placement. The arterial cannula was connected to a transducer (Blood Pressure XDCR, Kent Scientific), and AP signals were recorded over a 30-minutes period using a microcomputer equipped with an analog-to-digital converter (Windaq, 2 kHz sampling frequency, Dataq Instruments). The recorded data were analyzed on a beat-to-beat basis to quantify changes in SAP, diastolic AP (DAP), mean AP (MAP), and heart rate (HR) [28].

The cardiac effort was evaluated by the rate-pressure product (RPP), multiplying the SAP (mmHg) and the HR (bpm). RPP is considered a good measure of the cardiac function and has important clinical implications [29].

All animals were allocated into individual cages and subjected the same conditions regarding HCTZ availability and duration of HCTZ exposure before and after hemodynamic assessments, remaining until euthanasia.

Baroreflex sensitivity assessment

After baseline AP measurement, baroreflex sensitivity was assessed by using increasing doses of phenylephrine (0.5 to 2.0 g/mL, intravenous) and sodium nitroprusside (5 to 20 g/mL, intravenous) given as sequential bolus injections (0.1 mL) to produce AP rise and fall responses ranging from 5 to 40 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) each. An interval between doses was necessary for AP to return to baseline values. Peak increases or decreases in MAP after phenylephrine or sodium nitroprusside injection and the corresponding peak reflex changes in HR were recorded for each dose of the drug. Baroreflex sensitivity was assessed by a mean index relating changes in HR to changes in MAP, allowing a separate analysis of gain for reflex bradycardia and reflex tachycardia [28].

Vasopressor systems blockade

After baroreflex sensitivity assessment, AP was recorded under basal conditions for 5 minutes and then a vasopressin V1 receptor antagonist (aAVP) ([β-Mercapto-β,β-cyclopentamethylenepropionyl, O-me-Tyr2, Arg8]-Vasopressin; 10 μg/kg; Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) was injected intravenously and the AP and signals were recorded over a period of 15 minutes. After that, losartan, an angiotensin II (Ang II) AT1 receptor antagonist (losartan potassium; 10 mg/kg, Medley Pharmaceuticals, Campinas, SP, BR) was injected intravenously after a new 5-minutes interval recorded and then 15 minutes were registered. Finally, 5 minutes were recorded and hexamethonium, a sympathetic ganglion blocking drug (hexane-1,6-bis[trimethylammonium bromide]; 20 mg/kg, Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) was injected intravenously. AP and HR were again recorded for 15 minutes [30]. The 5 minutes-average of MAP recording (lower values) after injection of each drug was used to assess the responses to vasopressor systems blockade. The difference between the MAP before and after injection of each drug was the response of each system.

Heart rate and arterial pressure variability

Time domain analysis consisted of calculating mean pulse interval (PI) and SAP, with PI variability and SAP variability as the standard deviation from its respective time series. The entire tachogram was visualized by plotting the PI over time, and the three most stable sequences of 5 uninterrupted minutes from the total period were chosen. We chose one sequence at the beginning, one sequence in the middle, and one sequence at the end of the 30 minutes of AP recording. The sequences were individually analyzed for HR variability (HRV) and AP variability (APV) and the mean value of the 3 sequences was calculated for each animal. Both HRV and AVP were analyzed in time and frequency domains (spectral analysis was used for frequency domain parameters) with the CardioSeries (version 2.4, CardioSeries Software, Sao Paulo University, Brazil) software. Spectral power for low-frequency (LF, 0.20–0.75 Hz) and high-frequency (HF, 0.75–4.0 Hz) bands were calculated.

Anthropometry and tissue collection

The rats were weighted weekly during the protocol.

The rats were pre-anesthetized with ketamine one day after hemodynamic evaluations and were submitted to euthanasia by decapitation. Heart, visceral white adipose tissue (WAT), and skeletal muscles (soleus and plantaris) were collected. These tissues were immediately removed after euthanasia, properly weighed and the heart was immediately frozen at -80°C for inflammatory and oxidative stress analyses.

Inflammatory mediators

A commercially available ELISA kit (R&D Systems Inc.) was used to assessment of TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-10 levels in cardiac tissue. The procedure was performed in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. ELISA was performed in 96-well polystyrene microplate with a specific monoclonal antibody coating. Absorbance was measured at 540 nm in a microplate reader.

Oxidative stress assessment

Cardiac tissues were cut into small pieces, placed in ice-cold buffer, and homogenized in an ultra-Turrax blender with 1g of tissue per 5 mL of 120 mmol/L KCl and 30 nmol/L phosphate buffer, pH 7.4. Homogenates were centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 10 minutes at 4°C. The supernatant was stored in a freezer at −80°C. Protein was determined as described previously [31].

Our study evaluated oxidative stress damage by lipoperoxidation (thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS)) and by protein oxidation (by carbonyls), pro-oxidant by nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase activity and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) concentration, and antioxidant profile by enzymes activities: superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT) and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and by ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), as well as nitrites in cardiac tissue. The techniques are detailed in the S1 File.

Statistical analysis

Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Distribution and homogeneity of variances were assessed using Shapiro-Wilk and Levene’s tests, respectively. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the groups, followed by the Tukey post hoc test when appropriate. The Games-Howell post hoc test was used for lack of homogeneity of variances. Repeated measures ANOVA was used for tail plethysmography and exercise tests, and Bonferroni’s post hoc test was used when necessary. The relationship between autonomic and antioxidant enzymes with SAP and HRV were analyzed by Pearson correlation analysis. The p < 0.05 value was considered as statistically difference between groups. IBM SPSS Statistical software for Windows (Version 23.0) was used to analyze the data.

Results

Anthropometry

Considering the diuretic and metabolic effects of HCTZ, we monitored the body weight (BW) and WAT of the animals to assess possible differences in weight gain throughout the study. Additionally, we evaluated skeletal muscle weight to determine if the exercise training model could alter this parameter compared to the non-trained groups. At the start of the protocol (day 1) and during the pre-intervention period, all groups had similar BW (grams) (week 2). At the end of the protocol, after 8 weeks of intervention (week 10), all ovariectomized groups showed increased BW compared with C group. However, weight gain during the study was higher in rats treated with HCTZ alone (OH: +22% vs. C: +10%). Heart and skeletal muscle weights were similar between groups. The cardiac hypertrophy index (HW/BW: heart weight/bodyweight ratio) did not differ between groups. It’s worth noting that the OH groups had more WAT than the C group. There was no difference for daily feed intake. Water intake was higher in the O and OT groups compared with other groups. These findings can be found in the Table 1.

Table 1. Anthropometric measurements and water and feed intake.

  C O OH OT OTH P
Initial BW, g 179.3 ± 8.7 183.8 ± 10.4 180.8 ± 7.3 183.0 ± 10.5 182.5 ± 10.8 0.885
Pre-intervention BW, g 186.8 ± 11.7 198.3 ± 13.7 188.0 ± 8.6 200.8 ± 11.4 189.5 ± 12.5 0.073
Final BW, g 206.8 ± 11.1 233.5 ± 13.9* 230.0 ± 9.0* 233.3 ± 7.1* 220.0 ± 9.2 <0.001
BW gain, g 20.0 ± 11.1 35.3 ± 7.6 42.0 ± 5.8* 32.5 ± 13.6 30.5 ± 13.0 0.005
Heart weight, g 0.800 ± 0.047 0.793 ± 0.052 0.780 ± 0.086 0.856 ± 0.119 0.860 ± 0.163 0.395
HW/BW, mg/g 3.87 ± 0.18 3.40 ± 0.17 3.39 ± 0.29 3.68 ± 0.57 3.91 ± 0.75 0.066
WAT weight, mg 0.625 ± 0.223 0.830 ± 0.185 0.906 ± 0.200* 0.816 ± 0.147 0.658 ± 0.153 0.019
Soleus weight, mg 0.097 ± 0.009 0.100 ± 0.017 0.108 ± 0.007 0.102 ± 0.009 0.103 ± 0.018 0.190
Plantaris weight, mg 0.194 ± 0.014 0.210 ± 0.020 0.203 ± 0.046 0.215 ± 0.020 0.206 ± 0.019 0.597
Daily feed intake, g 15.9 ± 1.37 16.1 ± 2.10 16.8 ± 2.49 16.2 ± 1.59 16.4 ± 1.74 0.664
Daily water intake, ml 26.3 ± 3.19 32.0 ± 4.67* 26.6 ± 3.91 30.3 ± 3.74* 24.9 ± 3.01§ <0.001

Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (n = 8/group) and were analyzed using 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey as a post hoc test.

Hypertensive control (C) and hypertensive ovariectomized rats: sedentary (O), treated with HCTZ (OH), trained (OT) and trained and treated with HCTZ (OTH).

* p < 0.05 vs. C

† p < 0.05 vs. O

‡ p < 0.05 vs. OH

§ p < 0.05 vs.

OT. BW, body weight; HW/BW, heart weight to body weight ratio; WAT, white adipose tissue.

Maximal exercise tests

Performance in exercises tests is an important indicator of the effectiveness of exercise training. We evaluated functional performance in both tests corresponding to the two types of proposed exercises (aerobic and resistance). For the maximal running test, there were main effects for moment (p < 0.001) (showing difference between evaluated moments), group (p < 0.021) (showing differences between studied groups) and moment-by-group interaction (p < 0.001) (showing a different effect of intervention (s) over time). Running performance increased in both trained groups in the fourth and eighth weeks when compared to their initial tests. In contrast, no changes in running performance were observed in non-trained groups during the intervention period. Performance in treadmill test was similar between groups before of the intervention protocol (C: 23.7 ± 1.4, O: 22.4 ± 1.5, OH: 22.4 ± 1.7, OT: 21.2 ± 2.1 and OTH: 21.0 ± 2.3 min). However, HCTZ plus CET group (OTH: 27.0 ± 1.8 min) presented a higher performance in relation to O (22.8 ± 1.6 min) and OH groups (22.2 ± 1.4 min) at the fourth week. In addition, performance in both trained groups (OT and OTH) were higher in relation C and OH groups at the final of the intervention (OT: 26.9 ± 3.7 and OTH: 26.8 ± 4.1 vs. C: 22.3 ± 2.0 and OH: 22.2 ± 2.3 min) (Fig 1A).

Fig 1. Exercise performance tests in the studied groups.

Fig 1

(A) maximal running test (treadmill) and (B) maximal load test (ladder) in hypertensive control (C) and hypertensive ovariectomized rats: sedentary (O), treated with HCTZ (OH), trained (OT) and trained and treated with HCTZ (OTH). Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (n = 8/group) and were analyzed using ANOVA for repeated measures with Bonferroni’s correction, followed by Tukey as a post hoc test. * p < 0.05 vs. C; † p < 0.05 vs. O; ‡ p < 0.05 vs. OH, § p < 0.05 vs. OT.

Maximal load test also presented a main effect for moment (p < 0.001), group (p < 0.001) and moment-by-group interaction (p < 0.001). The C group showed higher load performance in the final protocol compared with their respective baseline test. The HCTZ treatment alone induced increase in load performance at the fourth week, however this result was not maintained in the final test. Both trained groups showed an improvement in load test performance at the end of the intervention period (eight vs. first and fourth weeks). Similar performance was observed in the ladder test at the beginning of the protocol (C: 167 ± 19, O: 150 ± 16, OH: 156 ± 20, OT: 137 ± 13 and OTH: 159 ± 14% body weight). However, the combination HCTZ and CET induced a higher performance in relation to O group at the fourth week (OTH: 209 ± 19 vs. O: 156 ± 18% BW) and in relation to other groups at the eighth week (OTH: 269 ± 19 vs. C: 200 ± 33, O: 180 ± 21, OH: 179 ± 20 and OT: 210 ± 21% BW) (Fig 1B).

Tail plethysmography

The tail plethysmography measurement allowed us to assess the AP behavior throughout the study, as well as confirm the effectiveness of the pharmacological treatment in controlling the AP of the groups treated with HCTZ. SAP measured using tail plethysmography showed group (p < 0.001) and moment-by-group interaction effects (p = 0.001). Similar SAP was observed between groups at the beginning of the protocol (adaptation phase) (C: 168 ± 3, O: 172 ± 7, OH: 172 ± 8, OT: 167 ± 6 and OTH: 164 ± 7 mmHg). The O group (O: 179 ± 8 mmHg) presented increase in SAP at the beginning of the intervention (post drug adaptation/day 1 of the intervention period) in relation to C (164 ± 2 mmHg), OH (164 ± 8 mmHg) and OTH groups (155 ± 7 mmHg). Higher SAP values were observed in O group again in the fourth (C: 166 ± 10; OH: 167 ± 9, OTH: 159 ± 11 vs. O: 187 ± 5 mmHg) and at the end of the intervention period (C: 165 ± 9; OH: 169 ± 6 and OTH: 161 ± 12 vs. O: 185 ± 12 mmHg). In addition, the OT group showed lower SAP in relation to O group also at the fourth (OT: 163 ± 14 mmHg) and eighth weeks (OT: 168 ± 12 mmHg) (see S1 Fig).

Hemodynamic and cardiac functional assessment

The final hemodynamic assessment provides information on the effectiveness of the antihypertensive treatments (medication and exercise training) in the ovariectomized groups that received the intervention either individually or in combination. The rats submitted to intervention (HCTZ treatment alone, exercise training alone or associated with HCTZ) showed lower SAP (p = 0.006) (OH: 181 ± 15, OT: 178 ± 18 and OTH: 178 ± 18 mmHg) compared to O group (206 ± 15 mmHg), but there were no differences when compared with the C group (196 ± 20 mmHg). Furthermore, CET alone or combined with HCTZ promoted a lower MAP (p = 0.013) in relation to O group (OT: 153 ± 15 and OTH: 153 ± 17 vs. O: 178 ± 17 mmHg); however, without difference in relation to other groups (C: 167 ± 16 and OH: 156 ± 13 mmHg). No differences were observed between groups for DAP (C: 141 ± 15, O: 152 ± 21, OH: 133 ± 13, OT: 130 ± 13 and OTH: 131 ± 17 mmHg, p = 0.054). In turn, resting bradycardia was observed in trained groups (p = 0.002) (OT: 331 ± 21 and OTH: 346 ± 24 bpm) in relation to C (384 ± 28 bpm vs. OT) and O groups (387 ± 36 bpm vs. OT and OTH), but without differences in relation to OH group (366 ± 30 bpm) after 8 weeks of intervention. The groups that received pharmacological treatment and/or underwent exercise training showed lower RPP (mmHg*bpm x 103) compared to the ovariectomized group (OH: 66.5 ± 8.3, OT: 59.0 ± 8.0 and OTH: 61.3 ± 6.0 vs. O: 80.1 ± 11.6, p < 0.001). The RPP was also reduced in trained groups (OT and OTH) in relation to the C group (75.1 ± 9.5) (Fig 2A–2E).

Fig 2. Hemodynamic and cardiac function assessments.

Fig 2

(A) Systolic, (B) diastolic and (C) mean arterial pressure, (D) resting heart rate and (E) rate-pressure product in hypertensive control (C) and hypertensive ovariectomized rats: sedentary (O), treated with HCTZ (OH), trained (OT) and trained and treated with HCTZ (OTH). Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (n = 7-8/group) and were analyzed using 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey as a post hoc test. * p < 0.05 vs. C; † p < 0.05 vs. O; ‡ p < 0.05 vs. OH. SAP, systolic arterial pressure; DAP, diastolic arterial pressure, MAP, mean arterial pressure; HR, heart rate; RPP, rate-pressure product.

Baroreflex sensitivity

Considering that the baroreceptor reflex is impaired in AH, we evaluated whether HCTZ, exercise training, or the combination of both could restore this important reflex by increasing the sensitivity of the bradycardic and tachycardic responses. Both trained groups (OT and OTH) presented an increased bradycardic response to phenylephrine compared with O group (OT: −1.3 ± 0.4 and OTH: −1.6 ± 0.3 vs. O: −0.6 ± 0.3 bpm/mmHg) (p < 0.001). The C (−1.0 ± 0.3 bpm/mmHg) and OH groups (−1.1 ± 0.6 bpm/mmHg) did not show differences in bradycardic response compared with other groups. Moreover, the O group showed a decrease in tachycardic response (bpm/mmHg) to sodium nitroprusside compared with C group (C: −2.4 ± 0.4 vs. O: −1.3 ± 0.5 bpm/mmHg). However, trained alone or combined with HCTZ groups showed an increase in tachycardic response compared with O group (OT: −2.4 ± 0.8 and OTH: −2.4 ± 0.8 vs. O: −1.3 ± 0.5 bpm/mmHg) (p = 0.004) (Fig 3A and 3B).

Fig 3. Baroreflex sensitivity assessed by administration of increasing doses of phenylephrine and sodium nitroprusside.

Fig 3

(A) Bradycardic and (B) tachycardic response of the baroreflex sensitivity in hypertensive control (C) and hypertensive ovariectomized rats: sedentary (O), treated with HCTZ (OH), trained (OT) and trained and treated with HCTZ (OTH). Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (n = 7-8/group) and were analyzed using 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey as a post hoc test. * p < 0.05 vs. C; † p < 0.05 vs. O. BRS, baroreflex sensitivity.

Heart rate variability and arterial pressure variability

In our protocol, measures of HRV and APV provide information about cardiac and vascular autonomic modulation, respectively. In this regard, elevated sympathetic modulation of both cardiac and vascular systems is observed in AH. We did not observe differences between the groups in terms of PI variance (Var-PI) and root mean square of successive differences between normal heartbeats (RMSSD) between groups. However, we found that HCTZ plus CET (OTH group) induced a lower LF band and a higher HF band of PI compared to the O group (Table 2), resulting in a lower sympathovagal balance (LF/HF ratio).

Table 2. Heart rate variability and arterial pressure variability.

  C O OH OT OTH p
Var-PI, ms2 56.2 ± 18.2 57.8 ± 21.8 53.5 ± 19.4 45.7 ± 18.1 60.0 ± 20.1 0.515
RMSSD, ms 6.6 ± 1.0 6.1 ± 0.7 5.8 ± 0.9 5.9 ± 1.6 6.6 ± 1.1 0.488
LF, nu 22.9 ± 5.4 30.2 ± 4.0 24.0 ± 6.7 25.7 ± 4.5 22.2 ± 4.9 0.043
HF, nu 77.1 ± 5.4 69.8 ± 4.0 76.0 ± 6.7 74.3 ± 4.5 77.8 ± 4.9 0.043
LF/HF 0.32 ± 0.10 0.45 ± 0.09 0.34 ± 0.10 0.37 ± 0.09 0.30 ± 0.08 0.036
Var-SAP, mmHg2 53.3 ± 13.6 60.1 ± 13.1 44.7 ± 10.5 33.5 ± 13.2* 30.3 ± 10.5* <0.001
LF-SAP, mmHg2 16.3 ± 6.7 18.8 ± 6.1 15.8 ± 5.5 6.9 ± 6.0* 6.2 ± 5.2* <0.001

Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (n = 7-8/group) and were analyzed using 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey as a post hoc test.

Hypertensive control (C) and hypertensive ovariectomized rats: sedentary (O), treated with HCTZ (OH), trained (OT) and trained and treated with HCTZ (OTH).

* p < 0.05 vs. C

† p < 0.05 vs. O

‡ p < 0.05 vs.

OH. Var-PI, variance of pulse interval; RMSSD, root mean square of successive differences between normal heartbeats; LF, low frequency band; HF, high frequency band; Var-SAP, variance of systolic arterial pressure; LF-SAP, low frequency band of systolic arterial pressure.

Both trained groups (OT and OTH) presented lower variance of SAP (Var-SAP) compared with C and O. Regarding vascular sympathetic modulation, OT and OTH groups presented reduction in the LF band of SAP (LF-SAP) compared with non-trained groups (Table 2).

Vasopressor systems blockade

Sequential blockade of vasoconstrictor mechanisms allows investigation of the contribution of each evaluated mechanism to the basal AP levels, which is of interest in a condition of AH and postmenopause undergoing antihypertensive approaches. There were no differences in MAP (mmHg) after aAVP and Ang II AT1 receptor blockade. However, hexamethonium injection resulted in a greater reduction of MAP in the O group when compared to the C group. Furthermore, the reduction in MAP after autonomic ganglia blockade was lower in the OTH group compared to the O group (Table 3).

Table 3. Reduction in mean arterial pressure after vasopressor systems blockade.

 Δ MAP, mmHg C O OH OT OTH p
    aAVP -3.3 ± 1.8 -6.9 ± 4.9 -6.3 ± 3.5 -4.4 ± 1.8 -5.0 ± 1.6 0.178
    Losartan -9.8 ± 3.8 -12.5 ± 3.0 -8.7 ± 2.1 -9.5 ± 6.0 -8.7 ± 4.0 0.381
    Hexamethonium -53.2 ± 12.6 -75.4 ± 18.4* -54.9 ± 9.0 -62.9 ± 15.7 -49.8 ± 12.4 0.009

Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (n = 7-8/group) and were analyzed using 1-way ANOVA without (hexamethonium) or with Welch’s correction (aAVP and losartan), followed by Tukey (hexamethonium) as a post hoc test.

Hypertensive control (C) and hypertensive ovariectomized rats: sedentary (O), treated with HCTZ (OH), trained (OT) and trained and treated with HCTZ (OTH).

* p < 0.05 vs. C

† p < 0.05 vs.

O. aAVP, vasopressin V1 receptor antagonist.

Inflammatory mediators

Inflammation is directly involved in the pathophysiology of AH. In our study, we evaluated important pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α and IL-6) involved in this condition, as well as the potential of the approaches to induce possible increases in IL-10, an anti-inflammatory cytokine. IL-6 levels in cardiac tissue were similar between groups. However, OTH group presented higher levels of cardiac TNF-α (vs. C) and IL-10 (vs. O and OH groups). OT showed higher IL-10/TNF-α ratio compared with non-trained groups, while the combination with HCTZ result in increased ratio in relation all groups (Table 4).

Table 4. Inflammatory mediators assessed in cardiac tissue.

  C O OH OT OTH p
TNF-α, pg/mg protein 42.8 ± 8.0 46.7 ± 16.7 41.5 ± 10.3 33.9 ± 7.0 31.8 ± 5.3* 0.025
IL-6, pg/mg protein 85.3 ± 14.9 87.9 ± 33.4 90.3 ± 15.2 93.2 ± 13.3 99.6 ± 14.8 0.488
IL-10, pg/mg protein 65.2 ± 12.5 52.8 ± 23.2 45.1 ± 10.6 59.9 ± 10.4 78.1 ± 17.3 0.004
IL-10/TNF-α 1.32 ± 0.21 1.18 ± 0.12 1.19 ± 0.29 1.72 ± 0.19* 1.99 ± 0.07*§ <0.001

Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (n = 7-8/group) and were analyzed using 1-way ANOVA without (IL-6 and IL-10) or with Welch’s correction (TNF-α), followed by Tukey (IL-10 and IL-10/TNF-α) and Games-Howell (TNF-α) as a post hoc test.

Hypertensive control (C) and hypertensive ovariectomized rats: sedentary (O), treated with HCTZ (OH), trained (OT) and trained and treated with HCTZ (OTH).

* p < 0.05 vs. C

† p < 0.05 vs. O

‡ p < 0.05 vs. OH

§ p < 0.05 vs. OT.

TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor alpha; IL-6, interleukin 6; IL-10, interleukin 10.

Oxidative stress

Similar to the inflammation, oxidative stress plays a key role in the development and progression of AH. In this regard, we aimed to investigate parameters of oxidative damage, as well as pro-oxidant and antioxidant profile, focusing on the effects of the approaches used in the study. Protein oxidation was increased after ovarian hormone deprivation (OS group) (4.62 ± 0.85 nmol/mg protein) in relation to all groups (C: 3.69 ± 0.75, OH: 3.87 ± 0.48, OT: 3.48 ± 0.44 and OTH: 3.69 ± 0.49 nmol/mg protein, p = 0.010). Pro-oxidant profile (NADPH oxidase) was higher in O in relation to C group (O: 0.39 ± 0.12 vs. C: 0.24 ± 0.07 nmol/mg protein), without differences to OH group (OH: 0.31 ± 0.07). On the other hand, trained groups showed decrease in NADPH oxidase in relation to O group (OT: 0.27 ± 0.06 and OTH: 0.24 ± 0.09 nmol/mg protein vs. O) (p = 0.005). In addition, OH, OT and OTH groups showed reduced cardiac H2O2 levels in relation to C group (OH: 1.7 ± 0.3, OT: 2.0 ± 0.4 and OTH: 1.8 ± 0.4 vs. C: 2.7 ± 0.6 μM/mg protein, p < 0.001). Interestingly, C and OTH groups showed increased cardiac SOD activity compared to OH and OT groups (C: 14.0 ± 1.5 and OTH: 13.7 ± 0.6 vs. OH: 11.9 ± 1.0 and OT: 11.7 ± 0.3 USOD/mg protein, p < 0.001). However, any differences were observed between O and other groups (12.4 ± 0.8 USOD/mg protein). The O group presented a lower cardiac CAT activity in relation to C group (O: 0.87 ± 0.28 vs. C: 1.35 ± 0.24 nmol/mg protein), without differences in relation to OH and OT (OH: 1.16 ± 0.14 and OT: 1.07 ± 0.21 nmol/mg protein). However, OTH group reduce this parameter (OTH: 1.20 ± 0.17 nmol/mg protein vs. O). Finally, HCTZ combined with CET promote increase in cardiac GPx (nmol/mg protein) in relation to O group (OTH: 27.1 ± 3.24 vs. O: 19.4 ± 5.71 nmol/mg protein, p = 0.024), but there were no statistical differences compared with C (24.4 ± 5.86 nmol/mg protein), OH (24.0 ± 3.34 nmol/mg protein) and OT groups (24.4 ± 2.97 nmol/mg protein) (Fig 4A–4F). Oxidative stress induced-cardiac damage evaluated by TBARS (C: 2.95 ± 0.72, O: 3.52 ± 1.09, OH: 2.37 ± 0.88, OT: 3.03 ± 0.95 and OTH: 3.47 ± 1.59 μmol/mg protein, p = 0.224), FRAP (C: 0.46 ± 0.22, O: 0.46 ± 0.20, OH: 0.50 ± 0.19, OT: 0.61 ± 0.14 and OTH: 0.54 ± 0.11 mM Fe(ii), p = 0.424) and nitrite concentrations (C: 1.67 ± 0.35, O: 1.70 ± 0.20, OH: 1.66 ± 0.16, OT: 1.90 ± 0.31 and OTH: 1.82 ± 0.24 μmol/mg protein, p = 0.296) were not different between studied groups.

Fig 4. Oxidative stress assessed in cardiac tissue.

Fig 4

Oxidative stress damage (A), pro-oxidant (B and C) and antioxidant enzymes (D–F) assessed in hypertensive control (C) and hypertensive ovariectomized rats: sedentary (O), treated with HCTZ (OH), trained (OT) and trained and treated with HCTZ (OTH). Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (n = 7-8/group) and were analyzed using 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey as a post hoc test. * p < 0.05 vs. C; † p < 0.05 vs. O; ‡ p < 0.05 vs. OH; § p < 0.05 vs. OT. NADPH, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate; H2O2, hydrogen peroxide; SOD, superoxide dismutase; CAT, catalase; GPx, glutathione peroxidase.

Correlations

We investigate whether these parameters could be related to AP, autonomic and inflammatory changes in studied groups based on a significant improvement in APV in OT group. Our data showed positive relationships between Var-SAP and LF-SAP with SAP, RPP, LF/HF ratio and IL-10/TNF-α ratio. Strong relationship between Var-SAP with LF-SAP was observed (see S1 Table).

The improvement in bradycardic response of baroreflex sensitivity of SAP was correlated with reduced SAP (R = 0.55, p < 0.001), RPP (R = 0.64, p < 0.001), Var-SAP (R = 0.61, p < 0.001), TNF-α (R = 0.5, p = 0.001) and protein oxidation (R = 0.54) (p < 0.005). RPP showed negative relationship with IL-10/TNF-α ratio (R = −0.48, p = 0.004). Finally, the cardiac IL-10/TNF-α ratio was inversely correlated with cardiac protein oxidation (R = −0.54, p = 0.001).

Discussion

The combined effect of medication and exercise is not simply the sum of their individual effects [32]. Therefore, we investigated the ability of CET associated with HCTZ in to modulate mechanisms related to AH pathophysiology in this study. We use a hypertensive model of postmenopause aimed at experimentally simulating the condition of postmenopausal females, a population in which AH is more prevalent and affected by cardiofunctional impairment. The main finding from this study is that an additional adjustment on AP control mechanisms is achieved when exercise training is associated with HCTZ treatment in hypertensive ovariectomized rats. The benefits are extended to functional capacity, cardiovascular and autonomic control, as well as cardiac anti-inflammatory and oxidative stress profiles. Thus, exercise practice during medication treatment could directly contribute to minimize the progression of the AH-related morbimortality.

Regarding metabolic results, previous study demonstrated that HCTZ has been linked to metabolic disorders, such as insulin resistance and fat storage [19]. In our study, we did not measure glycemic or insulin levels. However, we found that the non-exercised HCTZ-treated group gained more BW and had more WAT weight (see Table 1). In contrast, BW gain and WAT were similar in control and trained groups, suggesting that the medication approach can induce anthropometric changes even in the absence of increased feed intake. We believe that the participation of the RAAS may be one of the possible mechanisms related to the anthropometric effect, since the literature has shown an increase in the RAAS after HCTZ [18]. In fact, the production of angiotensinogen by adipose tissue promotes adipogenesis, and Ang II can induce the process of adipose tissue accumulation by increasing the production of key lipogenic enzymes and inducing lipogenesis through the AT2 receptor pathway [33]. In contrast, the lack of greater BW gain in the trained group treated with HCTZ could be explained by down-regulation of vasoconstrictor axis of the RAAS and the likely increased energy expenditure induced by CET.

In addition to metabolic benefits, our data showed that the performance in the treadmill exercise test improved in both trained groups, as previously reported [8], but significantly improved in the resistance exercise test only when CET was combined with HCTZ. In fact, older hypertensive adults using 25–50 mg of HCTZ daily did not presented alterations in VO2 peak after treatment [34]. However, clinical evidence has showed an increase in the treadmill walking time after combination of HCTZ and amiloride in patient with chronic stable angina [35]. Furthermore, impaired muscle adaptation has been reported when aerobic and resistance exercise are including in a same exercise training program [36]. Therefore, the marked enhancement in maximal strength performance of the OTH group in the present study suggest that HCTZ, when combined with exercise training, appears significantly improve strength production during maximal load test in hypertensive ovariectomized rats. However, we have no knowledge of evidence on how exercise training could affect the pharmacodynamics of HCTZ. Given that the magnitude enhance in the OTH group was also better than the OT group in the resistance exercise test, our data suggests that the higher performance in the OTH group may be related to a possible effect of HCTZ in trained rats rather than the opposite. On the other hand, we speculate that higher BW gain and WAT weight in the OH group may have hampered performance. The possibility of exercise manipulating the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of the HCTZ is a point to be investigated and further experimental evidence are needed to clarify this issue.

Regarding hemodynamic evaluations, HCTZ alone promoted SAP reduction in both indirectly and directly AP assessment in ovariectomized hypertensive rats. Furthermore, our CET protocol alone or combined with HCTZ was effective in reducing SAP and MAP. These data demonstrated that both therapies (OH, OT and OHT groups) were able to avoid the increase in SAP associated with ovarian hormones deprivation in hypertensive rats in the present study. It is important to emphasize that thiazide diuretics are among the preferred classes for antihypertensive treatment in monotherapy or in combination with other classes. The usual daily dose of HCTZ ranges between 25–50 mg [12]. However, inadequate AP control after medication treatment in AH is common and strategies such as increasing the dose or combination with other classes of antihypertensive are used. In fact, compensatory upregulation of the AP control mechanism has been implicated in response to HCTZ. In these sense, clinical [16, 17, 37] and experimental studies [18] have reported that sympathetic nervous system [16] and RAAS [17, 18, 37] are stimulated by HCTZ, including in low doses of HCTZ (e.g. 25 mg daily) [17]. On the other hand, exercise training has been demonstrated positively modulate autonomic nervous systems thought reduction in sympathetic activity [38]. Regarding the RAAS, evidences have shown that exercise training modulates both the Ang II/AT1 and Ang 1-7/Mas axes, promoting a down and up regulation, respectively [39, 40]. Water intake during the experimental protocol (see Table 1) was comparable between OH and OTH groups in our study. In this regard, CET shown a better potential to promote MAP control probably due to the high potential of this approach to improve cardiovascular autonomic control.

The baroreceptor reflex regulates moment-to-moment the AP and plays a key role for maintaining cardiovascular homeostasis. Exercise training has previously been shown to improve baroreflex sensitivity in female ovariectomized rats [8, 22, 28]. In the present study, we showed that ovariectomy reduced the tachycardic responses of baroreflex sensitivity. Despite HCTZ alone did not change baroreflex sensitivity, CET alone or combined with HCTZ improved both bradycardic and tachycardic responses of baroreflex sensitivity, suggesting that the improvement observed in OTH was likely determined by the potential effect of exercise and not the effect of HCTZ. The bradycardic response is more vagal-dependent, while the tachycardic responses is more sympathetic-dependent. The increase and decrease of the vagal and sympathetic activity, respectively, has been cumulatively supported as a positive adaptation to exercise training. A pertinent hypothesis that could to explain our data is the possibility of increased sensitivity of the afferent and/or efferent pathways, as well as the sinoatrial node to the heart, resulting in better reflex responses [25]. Moreover, evidence has suggested that a reduction in vascular wall distensibility and structural alterations in large arteries are associated with chronic baroreceptor dysfunction in AH [41]. On the other hand, improvements in carotid arterial distensibility index combined with improved baroreflex sensitivity after exercise have been observed in humans [26]. Experimentally, vascular adaptations such as vasodilation and vascular compliance have been shown to improve in chronically trained SHR [42]. Therefore, we hypothesized that the improvement in baroreflex sensitivity may be related to neural component and mechanosensitive adaptations of the arteries induced by training.

We hypothesize that improvements in vagal modulation, as measured by the increase in HF band and indirectly assessed by HRV, contributed to improvements in bradycardic responses. Although our study found no improvement in vagal modulation in the OT group as measured by HRV, it is possible that CET alone increased vagal tonus to the heart [43], as evidenced by the expressive resting bradycardia seen in the OT group. In the same way, it is possible that reduction in cardiac, vascular and overall sympathetic contribution, as verified by the reduction of the LF (nu) (OTH group), LF-SAP (OT and OTH groups) and the lower reduction of the MAP after hexamethonium injection (OTH group), respectively, support the enhanced tachycardic responses.

Sympathetic overactivity is one of the most well documented physiological dysfunctions in AH-related genesis and end-organ damage [44]. Furthermore, postmenopausal women had a higher sympathetic contribution to AP levels than younger women [44]. Thus, strategies to reduce cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction in postmenopausal women are clinically desired. In the present study, no statistically significant effects were observed for HCTZ and exercise training on the contribution of vasopressin and RAAS system in the baseline MAP. Despite we did not measure RAAS components, there is some evidence indicate an increase after chronic HCTZ treatment [17, 18, 37]. In addition, Ang II can stimulate sympathetic activation [45], which may exacerbate this mechanism which is elevated in AH. Furthermore, evidence has reported a sympathoexcitatory effect promoted by diuretics [46]. However, the influence of the HCTZ on sympathetic activity are inconsistent. In this sense, plasma norepinephrine and norepinephrine release rate remained unchanged in elderly hypertensives after six months of treatment with HCTZ [47]. In obese hypertensive individuals, Grassi et al. [15] also did not observed differences in muscle sympathetic nerve activity after 12 week of HCTZ treatment. In the present study, ovariectomized group (O) showed greater sympathetic contribution on the basal MAP values than the C group after autonomic ganglia blockade by hexamethonium; and the HCTZ plus CET reduce the sympathetic tonus on MAP. This finding supports the positive role of CET in the management of the counter-regulatory mechanism induced by HCTZ treatment, most likely modulating inflammation and oxidative stress and resulting in improved AP control.

It is important to remind that high APV observed in AH is an important factor related to end-organ damage, such as in the cardiac and renal tissues [48]. In this sense, in comparison to RAAS inhibitors, a meta-analysis found an association between diuretics (chlorthalidone and HCTZ) and lower left ventricular mass [49]. In addition to SAP control, male SHR who received four months of HCTZ treatment alone [48] or in combination with nifedipine [50] showed reduction in APV, as well as an increase in baroreflex sensitivity and a reduction in end-organ damage, such as ventricle, kidney and aortae. We found no change in baroreflex sensitivity, Var-SAP or LF-SAP in ovariectomized SHR submitted to HCTZ treatment alone. These findings suggest that there may be sex differences, probably exacerbated by ovarian hormone deprivation, in long-term HCTZ treatment. Aside from sex, the duration of intervention may have contributed to the partial reproducibility of these results. Furthermore, in the present study only trained groups showed a significant reduction in APV when compared to the non-trained groups. Otherwise, our findings are consistent with current evidence, which has shown that a combination of aerobic and resistance exercise can reduce APV in hypertensive patients [50] and SHR [8]. More importantly, we showed that lower AP values in studied rats were associated with improvements in Var-SAP and LF-SAP, LF/HF ratio and baroreflex sensitivity, reinforcing the role and interaction of cardiovascular autonomic changes in AP management in this model of hypertension and postmenopausal. Moreover, we observed that the improvement on bradycardic response of baroreflex sensitivity was correlated with better APV in studied animals.

Elevated levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α [51, 52], IL-1 [51, 52] and IL-6 [51] regulate sympathetic flow and AP, while IL-10 [52] exerts beneficial effects on these parameters. Furthermore, pro-inflammatory cytokines leads to an increased generation of reactive oxygen species [53, 54]. In this context, TNF-α and oxidative stress levels were previously found to be elevated in ovariectomized SHR [8]. Fukuzawa et al. [55], on the other hand, reported that HCTZ had no effect on TNF-α production in vivo or in vitro cells, which is consistent with our findings. However, when HCTZ and CET were combined, cardiac IL-10 levels and IL-10/TNF-α ratio were significantly lower (vs. O group). In this sense, we previously shown decrease in anti-inflammatory cytokines after ovariectomy [8], and that aerobic and resistance exercise training improved renal (increasing IL-10) [8] and cardiac inflammation (reducing TNF-α and IL-6) in ovariectomized SHR [8, 24]. Reduced TNF-α after exercise training has been reported also in male SHR [9]. Moreover, decreased levels of SOD and CAT, as well as increased lipoperoxidation and reactive oxygen species, have been observed in cardiac myocytes after exposure to TNF-α. Importantly, treatment with IL-10 prevented all these changes [10]. The antioxidant effect of IL-10 under conditions of increased oxidative stress has been also documented. IL-10 treatment has been shown to improve SOD and CAT activities, as well as the redox ratio in renal ischemia-reperfusion induced by lipid peroxidation [56]. Recently, Qiu et al. [57] demonstrated that IL-10 reverses AH-induced vascular hypertrophy, possibly through its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects. Moreover, Kaur et al. [10] have highlighted the antioxidant properties of IL-10 by mitigating the antioxidant changes caused by TNF-α. Additionally, the authors suggest that IL-10 and TNF-α have significant physiological implications in clinical conditions [10]. Based on our data, it is plausible to speculate that exercise training contributed more to anti-inflammatory and antioxidant adaptations in the OTH group than HCTZ alone. Moreover, the anti-inflammatory effects and reported antioxidant effect promoted by IL-10 may have contributed to the improvement of the cardiac oxidative stress profile observed in the trained rats, mainly in the OTH group, probably positively impacting in the cardiac function (RPP) and in the functional capacity.

It is also worth noting that the sympathetic nervous system regulates the pro-inflammatory response [58]. Indeed, our findings showed a link between decreased LF-SAP and Var-SAP, and a lower cardiac IL-10/TNF-α ratio. As a result, we believe that exercise-induced effect on APV can positively modulate the cardiac inflammatory profile, resulting in less end-organ damage in AH.

Reactive oxygen species are involved in signaling from cell to system, and pro-oxidant enzymes are implicated in an oxidative profile [58]. In AH, oxidative stress is regarded as a common, but non-unique, factor that influences the local and systemic processes that favors AH [58]. In addition, inflammatory mediators are known to active pro-oxidants and influence redox balance. In this regard, the current study found that an increase in cardiac IL-10/TNF-α ratio was associated with lower protein oxidation. We also found high levels of pro-oxidant (NADPH oxidase) and protein oxidation, as well as a reduction in the antioxidant CAT activity in the cardiac tissue of the O group.

Additionally, in according with our data, HCTZ alone was not associated with amelioration of the vascular NADPH oxidase or superoxide anion levels [59] and did not change TBARS concentrations [60] in male SHR. However, in the present study 8-weeks of HCTZ treatment restored cardiac protein oxidation in ovariectomized SHR. Moreover, the combination of HCTZ with CET ameliorates pro-oxidant (NADPH oxidase and H2O2), enhanced antioxidants (CAT, SOD and GPx activities) in cardiac tissue, probably resulting in reduced protein oxidation, reflecting better redox balance in this group.

In fact, there is consistent evidence that antioxidant defense increase in response to aerobic or resistance exercises in cardiac and kidney tissues [22, 61]. Exercise training could induce activation of the nuclear factor erythroid 2-relatede factor 2 (Nrf2), which is a most important transcription factor recognized for regulating antioxidant response, acting on a specific portion of DNA, known as AREs (antioxidant response elements), encoding antioxidant enzymes, such as SOD, CAT, and GPx [62]. Furthermore, there are evidence that exercise training could promote a reduction in norepinephrine levels, resulting in an inhibitory effect on pro-inflammatory (TNF-α) and oxidative stress profile (reduction in NADPH oxidase and superoxide anion), reflecting in an improved cardiac function [63]. In the same way, it is important to remind that we observed in the present study reduced Var-SAP, LF-SAP and hexamethonium response, evaluation associated with sympathetic nervous system, as well as increased anti-inflammatory (IL-10/TNF-α ratio) and antioxidant (CAT, SOD and GPx) profiles in cardiac tissue when CET was associated with HCTZ, but not in SHR treated only with HCTZ.

Importantly, these autonomic, inflammatory and redox positive adaptations induced by CET plus HCTZ were associated with improvement in cardiac function, evaluated by RPP, an important measure of cardiac function, representing a direct indication of the energy demand of the heart and thus a good measure of the cardiac energy consumption. In fact, we observed reduced RPP in ovariectomized SHR treated with HCTZ or trained, and in the association group (OHT) when compared to ovariectomized group. However, only the groups submitted to CET (OT and OHT) showed lower RPP compared to hypertensive control females (C group). Similar results were observed in female SHR after aerobic exercise training [64]. Considering that our findings demonstrated that RPP was correlated with Var-SAP, LF-SAP, baroreflex sensitivity and IL-10/TNF-α ratio, we suggest that autonomic and inflammatory CET plus HCTZ induced-improvements contributed to reduce cardiac damage and to enhance cardiac function.

Additionally, we previously demonstrated that baroreflex sensitivity is inversely related to oxidative stress damage in ovariectomized SHR [28]. Furthermore, a negative relationship between baroreflex sensitivity and end-organ damage has been observed in male SHR [48]. In accordance with these findings, we found that the improvement in baroreflex sensitivity (bradycardic response) was associated with lower TNF-α and protein oxidation in cardiac tissue in ovariectomized SHR, reinforcing the role of autonomic control of circulation in the modulation of mechanisms related to end-organ damage in AH, such as inflammation and oxidative stress.

It is important to emphasized that a significant number of hypertensive females are treated, but their AP remains uncontrolled [2, 4]. In this sense, the non-regulation of key mechanisms involved in AH, as well as cardiometabolic impairments caused by chronic AH, can compromise continuum well-management of the disease. Furthermore, the doses of antihypertensive medications are related to the side effects [12], which are determinant factors for discontinuation of the treatment [65]. In this sense, low adherence affects both medication [4] and exercise [66] approaches in AH. However, in contrast to the side effects of HCTZ, exercise induces numerous beneficial physiological effects for the body. Moreover, regular exercise is beneficial in AH for a possible reduction in the amount and/or dose of medication or, in some cases, discontinuation of medication, and is a key approach for the well-controlled AP. Strategies proposed to improve exercise adherence in hypertensive individual has showed also promising results [67]. Thus, the overall message is that the intensification of the recommendation by health professionals, including clinicians, is crucial for the adoption and continuity of a physically active life, which can have long-term health and health care costs implications.

Finally, it is important to remind that the primary goal of AH treatment is to manage AP and AH-related consequences, such as end-organ damage. However, some pharmacological therapy, despite lowering basal AP, were associated with activation of contra regulatory mechanism of AP control, such as sympathetic activity or RAAS. In this context, our findings support the exercise training as a coadjutant therapy in hypertensive postmenopausal women receiving HCTZ, implying a beneficial role of the combination of these approaches not only in AP control, but also in mechanisms associated with cardiac damage in AH. Future research should investigate the combination of exercise and antihypertensive drugs, with a focus on the effects on end-organ damage in different AH patients. Based on our data in the overall experimental and clinical evidence regarding the benefits of exercise training in hypertensive patients, we believe that this non-pharmacological approach, as well as an active lifestyle, should be encouraged and incorporated to a better management of classical and remaining risk in hypertensive patients on pharmacological treatment.

Conclusions

We concluded that CET alone or in combination with HCTZ were more effective than HCTZ alone in improving baroreflex sensitivity and APV in a model of hypertension and postmenopause. Furthermore, the combination of HCTZ and CET resulted in additional positive adaptations in HRV and sympathetic tonus in the basal AP. Importantly, these autonomic benefits were linked to better inflammatory and redox balance in the heart, which is a target organ in AH. Thus, combining exercise with a medication approach could be a promising strategy for managing dysfunctions associated with classic and remaining cardiovascular risk in AH in postmenopause.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Systolic arterial pressure assessed by tail plethysmography.

(DOCX)

S1 Table. Correlation analysis involving all studied groups.

(DOCX)

S1 File

(DOCX)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

MJF: 2019/06277-0, São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) (https://fapesp.br/). KDA and MCI: National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) (407398/2021-0; 406792/2022-4) (https://www.gov.br/cnpq/pt-br). Kátia De Angelis and Maria Claudia Irigoyen are recipients of CNPq Fellowship (CNPq-BPQ). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Harrison DG, Coffman TM, Wilcox CS. Pathophysiology of hypertension: the mosaic theory and beyond. Circ Res. 2021;128(7):847–63. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.318082 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zhou B, Carrillo-Larco RM, Danaei G, Riley LM, Paciorek CJ, Stevens GA, et al. Worldwide trends in hypertension prevalence and progress in treatment and control from 1990 to 2019: a pooled analysis of 1201 population-representative studies with 104 million participants. Lancet. 2021;398(10304):957–80. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01330-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ford ES, Ajani UA, Croft JB, Critchley JA, Labarthe DR, Kottke TE, et al. Explaining the decrease in U.S. deaths from coronary disease, 1980–2000. N Engl J Med. 2007. Jun 7;356(23):2388–98. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa053935 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Choudhry NK, Kronish IM, Vongpatanasin W, Ferdinand KC, Pavlik VN, Egan BM, et al. Medication adherence and blood pressure control: a scientific statement From the American Heart Association. Hypertension. 2022. Jan 1;79(1):E1–14. doi: 10.1161/HYP.0000000000000203 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rodriguez-Iturbe B, Pons H, Johnson RJ. Role of the immune system in hypertension. Physiol Rev. 2017. Jul 1;97(3):1127–64. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00031.2016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dörffel Y, Lätsch C, Stuhlmüller B, Schreiber S, Scholze S, Burmester GR, et al. Preactivated peripheral blood monocytes in patients with essential hypertension. Hypertension. 1999;34(1):113–7. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.34.1.113 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Peeters ACTM Netea MG, Janssen MCH Kullberg BJ, Van Der Meer JWM, Thien T. Pro-inflammatory cytokines in patients with essential hypertension. Eur J Clin Invest. 2001;31(1):31–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Shimojo GL, Dias D da S, Malfitano C, Sanches IC, Llesuy S, Ulloa L, et al. Combined aerobic and resistance exercise training improve hypertension associated with menopause. Front Physiol. 2018;9:1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Agarwal D, Haque M, Sriramula S, Mariappan N, Pariaut R, Francis J. Role of proinflammatory cytokines and redox homeostasis in exercise-induced delayed progression of hypertension in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 2009. Dec;54(6):1400. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.135459 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kaur K, Sharma AK, Dhingra S, Singal PK. Interplay of TNF-alpha and IL-10 in regulating oxidative stress in isolated adult cardiac myocytes. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2006. Dec;41(6):1023–30. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2006.08.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Roush GC, Kaur R, Ernst ME. Diuretics: a review and update. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2014. Jan;19(1):5–13. doi: 10.1177/1074248413497257 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Barroso WKS, Rodrigues CIS, Bortolotto LA, Mota-Gomes MA, Brandão AA, Feitosa AD de M, et al. Diretrizes Brasileiras de Hipertensão Arterial– 2020. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2021;116(3):516–658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.S V S M R W, H S . Systolic hypertension in the elderly. Hemodynamic response to long-term thiazide diuretic therapy and its side effects. JAMA. 1983. Nov 25;250(20):2807–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pickkers P, Garcha RS, Schachter M, Smits P, Hughes AD. Inhibition of carbonic anhydrase accounts for the direct vascular effects of hydrochlorothiazide. Hypertension. 1999;33(4):1043–8. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.33.4.1043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Grassi G, Seravalle G, Dell’Oro R, Trevano FQ, Bombelli M, Scopelliti F, et al. Comparative effects of candesartan and hydrochlorothiazide on blood pressure, insulin sensitivity, and sympathetic drive in obese hypertensive individuals: results of the CROSS study. J Hypertens. 2003. Sep 1;21(9):1761–9. doi: 10.1097/00004872-200309000-00027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lake CR, Ziegler MG, Coleman MD, Kopin IJ. Hydrochlorothiazide-induced sympathetic hyperactivity in hypertensive patients. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1979;26(4):428–32. doi: 10.1002/cpt1979264428 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Koenig W, Binner L, Gabrielsen F, Sund M, Rosenthal J, Hombach V. Catecholamines and the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system during treatment with felodipine ER or hydrochlorothiazide in essential hypertension. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1991;18(3):349–53. doi: 10.1097/00005344-199109000-00007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jessup JA, Brosnihan KB, Gallagher PE, Chappell MC, Ferrario CM. Differential effect of low dose thiazides on the renin angiotensin system in genetically hypertensive and normotensive rats. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2008;2(2):106–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2007.10.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Eriksson JW, Jansson PA, Carlberg B, Hägg A, Kurland L, Svensson MK, et al. Hydrochlorothiazide, but not Candesartan, aggravates insulin resistance and causes visceral and hepatic fat accumulation: the mechanisms for the diabetes preventing effect of Candesartan (MEDICA) Study. Hypertension. 2008. Dec;52(6):1030–7. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.119404 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, Casey DE Jr, Collins KJ, Himmelfarb CD, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults. Circulation. 2018;71(6):1269–324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Corso LML, MacDonald H V., Johnson BT, Farinatti P, Livingston J, Zaleski AL, et al. Is concurrent training efficacious antihypertensive therapy? A meta-analysis. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;48(12):2398–406. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001056 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.da Palma RK, Moraes-Silva IC, Dias D da S, Shimojo GL, Conti FF, Bernardes N, et al. Resistance or aerobic training decreases blood pressure and improves cardiovascular autonomic control and oxidative stress in hypertensive menopausal rats. J Appl Physiol. 2016;121(4):1032–8. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00130.2016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sanches IC, Brito J de O, Candido GO, Dias D da S, Jorge L, Irigoyen MC. Cardiometabolic benefits of exercise training in an experimental model of metabolic syndrome and menopause. Menopause J North Am Menopause Soc. 2012;19(5):562–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Conti FF, Brito J de O, Bernardes N, Dias D da S, Malfitano C, Morris M, et al. Positive effect of combined exercise training in a model of metabolic syndrome and menopause: autonomic, inflammatory, and oxidative stress evaluations. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2015;309(12):R1532–9. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00076.2015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Silva GJJ, Brum PC, Negrao CE, Krieger EM. Acute and chronic effects of exercise on baroreflexes in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 1997;30(3):714–9. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.30.3.714 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Studinger P, Lénárd Z, Kováts Z, Kocsis L, Kollai M. Static and dynamic changes in carotid artery diameter in humans during and after strenuous exercise. J Physiol. 2003. Jul 7;550(Pt 2):583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Laterza MC, Matos LDN. de., Trombetta IC, Braga AMW, Roveda F, Alves MJNN, et al. Exercise training restores baroreflex sensitivity in never-treated hypertensive patients. Hypertension. 2007. Jun;49(6):1298–306. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.106.085548 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Irigoyen MC, Paulini J, Flores LJF, Flues K, Bertagnolli M, Moreira ED, et al. Exercise training improves baroreflex sensitivity associated with oxidative stress reduction in ovariectomized rats. Hypertension. 2005;46(Part 2):998–1003. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000176238.90688.6b [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yazdani B, Kleber ME, Yücel G, Delgado GE, Benck U, Krüger B, et al. Association of double product and pulse pressure with cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in the LURIC study. J Clin Hypertens. 2020. Dec 1;22(12):2332–42. doi: 10.1111/jch.14067 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.De Angelis K, Gama VM, Farah VAM, Irigoyen MC. Blood flow measurements in rats using four color microspheres during blockade of different vasopressor systems. Brazilian J Med Biol Res. 2005;38(1):119–25. doi: 10.1590/s0100-879x2005000100018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951;193(1):265–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Pescatello LS, Wu Y, Gao S, Livingston J, Sheppard BB, Chen MH. Do the combined blood pressure effects of exercise and antihypertensive medications add up to the sum of their parts? A systematic meta-review. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2021;7(1):e000895. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2020-000895 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Pahlavani M, Kalupahana NS, Ramalingam L, Moustaid-Moussa N. Regulation and functions of the renin-angiotensin system in white and brown adipose tissue. Compr Physiol. 2017. Oct 1;7(4):1137–50. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c160031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Rinder MR, Spina RJ, Peterson LR, Koenig CJ, Florence CR, Ehsani AA. Comparison of effects of exercise and diuretic on left ventricular geometry, mass, and insulin resistance in older hypertensive adults. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2004. Aug;287(2):R360–8. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00409.2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Finimundi HC, Caramori PA, Parker JD. Effect of diuretic therapy on exercise capacity in patients with chronic angina and preserved left ventricular function. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2007. May;49(5):275–9. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0b013e3180385ad7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Coffey VG, Hawley JA. Concurrent exercise training: do opposites distract? J Physiol. 2017. May 1;595(9):2883–96. doi: 10.1113/JP272270 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Giles TD, Sander GE, Roffidal LC, Thomas MG, Given MB, Quiroz AC. Comparison of nitrendipine and hydrochlorothiazide for systemic hypertension. Am J Cardiol. 1987. Jul 1;60(1):103–6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(87)90994-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Li JY, Chen CW, Liu TH, Kuo TB, Yang CC. Exercise prevents hypertension and disrupts the correlation between vascular sympathetic activity and age-related increase in blood pressure in SHRs. Am J Hypertens. 2019. Oct 16;32(11):1091–100. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpz115 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ren CZ, Yang YH, Sun JC, Wu ZT, Zhang RW, Shen D, et al. Exercise training improves the altered renin-angiotensin system in the rostral ventrolateral medulla of hypertensive rats. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2016;2016:7413963. doi: 10.1155/2016/7413963 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Gomes-Filho A, Ferreira AJ, Santos SHS, Neves SRS, Silva Camargos ER, Becker LK, et al. Selective increase of angiotensin(1–7) and its receptor in hearts of spontaneously hypertensive rats subjected to physical training. Exp Physiol. 2008;93(5):589–98. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.2007.014293 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Chapleau MW, Cunningham JT, Sullivan MJ, Wachtel RE, Abboud FM. Structural versus functional modulation of the arterial baroreflex. Hypertension. 1995;26(2):341–7. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.26.2.341 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hägg U, Andersson I, Naylor AS, Grönros J, Jonsdottir IH, Bergström G, et al. Voluntary physical exercise-induced vascular effects in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Clin Sci. 2004;107(6):571–81. doi: 10.1042/CS20040171 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Souza SBC, Flues K, Paulini J, Mostarda C, Rodrigues B, Souza LE, et al. Role of exercise training in cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction and mortality in diabetic ovariectomized rats. Hypertension. 2007. Oct;50(4):786–91. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.095000 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Baker SE, Limberg JK, Dillon GA, Curry TB, Joyner MJ, Nicholson WT. Aging alters the relative contributions of the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous system to blood pressure control in women. Hypertension. 2018;72(5):1236–42. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.11550 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Matsukawa T, Gotoh E, Minamisawa K, Kihara M, Ueda SI, Shionoiri H, et al. Effects of intravenous infusions of angiotensin II on muscle sympathetic nerve activity in humans. Am J Physiol. 1991;261(3 Pt 2):R690–6. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1991.261.3.R690 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Raheja P, Price A, Wang Z, Arbique D, Adams-Huet B, Auchus RJ, et al. Spironolactone prevents chlorthalidone-induced sympathetic activation and insulin resistance in hypertensive patients. Hypertension. 2012. Aug;60(2):319–25. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.112.194787 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Wray DW, Supiano MA. Impact of aldosterone receptor blockade compared with thiazide therapy on sympathetic nervous system function in geriatric hypertension. Hypertension. 2010. May;55(5):1217–23. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.147058 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Xie HH, Shen FM, Zhang XF, Jiang YY, Su DF. Blood pressure variability, baroreflex sensitivity and organ damage in spontaneously hypertensive rats treated with various antihypertensive drugs. Eur J Pharmacol. 2006. Aug 14;543(1–3):77–82. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2006.05.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Roush GC, Abdelfattah R, Song S, Kostis JB, Ernst ME, Sica DA. Hydrochlorothiazide and alternative diuretics versus renin-angiotensin system inhibitors for the regression of left ventricular hypertrophy: a head-to-head meta-analysis. J Hypertens. 2018. Jun 1;36(6):1247–55. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001691 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Xie HH, Zhang XF, Chen YY, Shen FM, Su DF. Synergism of hydrochlorothiazide and nifedipine on blood pressure variability reduction and organ protection in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertens Res. 2008. Apr;31(4):685–91. doi: 10.1291/hypres.31.685 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Wu KLH, Chan SHH, Chan JYH. Neuroinflammation and oxidative stress in rostral ventrolateral medulla contribute to neurogenic hypertension induced by systemic inflammation. J Neuroinflammation. 2012. Sep 7;9(1):1–15. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-9-212 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Shi P, Raizada MK, Sumners C. Brain cytokines as neuromodulators in cardiovascular control. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2010. Feb;37(2):e57. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2009.05234.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Mariappan N, Soorappan RN, Haque M, Sriramula S, Francis J. TNF-alpha-induced mitochondrial oxidative stress and cardiac dysfunction: restoration by superoxide dismutase mimetic Tempol. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2007. Nov;293(5):H2726–37. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00376.2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Neri M, Cerretani D, Fiaschi AI, Laghi PF, Lazzerini PE, Maffione AB, et al. Correlation between cardiac oxidative stress and myocardial pathology due to acute and chronic norepinephrine administration in rats. J Cell Mol Med. 2007. Jan;11(1):156–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2007.00009.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Fukuzawa M, Satoh J, Ohta S, Takahashi K, Miyaguchi S, Qiang X, et al. Modulation of tumor necrosis factor-α production with anti-hypertensive drugs. Immunopharmacology. 2000. Jun;48(1):65–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Köken T, Serteser M, Kahraman A, Akbulut G, Nuri Dilek O. Which is more effective in the prevention of renal ischemia-reperfusion- induced oxidative injury in the early period in mice: Interleukin (IL)-10 or anti-IL-12? Clin Biochem. 2004;37(1):50–5. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2003.10.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Qiu M, Shu H, Li L, Shen Y, Tian Y, Ji Y, et al. Interleukin 10 attenuates angiotensin II-induced aortic remodelling by inhibiting oxidative stress-induced activation of the vascular p38 and NF-κB pathways. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2022;2022:8244497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Pedersen BK, Saltin B. Exercise as medicine–evidence for prescribing exercise as therapy in 26 different chronic diseases. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015;25(Suppl. 3):1–72. doi: 10.1111/sms.12581 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Yamamoto E, Kataoka K, Dong YF, Koibuchi N, Toyama K, Sueta D, et al. Calcium channel blockers, more than diuretics, enhance vascular protective effects of angiotensin receptor blockers in salt-loaded hypertensive rats. PLoS One. 2012. Jun 14;7(6):e39162. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039162 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Ceron CS, Castro MM, Rizzi E, Montenegro MF, Fontana V, Salgado MCO, et al. Spironolactone and hydrochlorothiazide exert antioxidant effects and reduce vascular matrix metalloproteinase-2 activity and expression in a model of renovascular hypertension. Br J Pharmacol. 2010. May;160(1):77–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.00678.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Brito-Monzani J de O, Stoyell-Conti FF, Shecaira TP, Silva MP dos SF, Dias D da S, Bernardes N, et al. Aerobic or resistance training improves autonomic control of circulation in oophorectomized rats with cardiometabolic dysfunctions: Impact on renal oxidative stress. Exp Gerontol. 2021. Mar 1;145(111181). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Done AJ, Traustadóttir T. Nrf2 mediates redox adaptations to exercise. Redox Biol. 2016. Dec 1;10:191–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Briones AM, Touyz RM. Moderate exercise decreases inflammation and oxidative stress in hypertension: but what are the mechanisms? Hypertension. 2009. Dec;54(6):1206–8. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.136622 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Renna BF, Kubo H, MacDonnell SM, Crabbe DL, Reger PO, Houser SR, et al. Enhanced acidotic myocardial Ca2+ responsiveness with training in hypertension. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006. May;38(5):847–55. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000218133.89584.a6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Grégoire JP, Moisan J, Guibert R, Ciampi A, Milot A, Gaudet M, et al. Determinants of discontinuation of new courses of antihypertensive medications. J Clin Epidemiol. 2002;55(7):728–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Mu L, Cohen AJ, Mukamal KJ. Prevalence and predictors of resistance and aerobic exercise among hypertensive adults in the United States. J Hum Hypertens. 2015. Jun 8;29(6):394–5. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2014.104 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Zaleski AL, Taylor BA, Park CL, Santos LP, Panza G, Kramarz M, et al. Using the immediate blood pressure benefits of exercise to improve exercise adherence among adults with hypertension: a randomized clinical trial. J Hypertens. 2019. Sep 1;37(9):1877–88. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002115 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Michael Bader

24 Apr 2023

PONE-D-23-10192Concurrent exercise training induces additional benefits to hydrochlorothiazide: evidence for improve on autonomic control and oxidative stress in hypertensive ratsPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. De Angelis,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jun 08 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Michael Bader

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please note that PLOS ONE has specific guidelines on code sharing for submissions in which author-generated code underpins the findings in the manuscript. In these cases, all author-generated code must be made available without restrictions upon publication of the work. Please review our guidelines at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/materials-and-software-sharing#loc-sharing-code and ensure that your code is shared in a way that follows best practice and facilitates reproducibility and reuse.

3. We note that the grant information you provided in the ‘Funding Information’ and ‘Financial Disclosure’ sections do not match. 

When you resubmit, please ensure that you provide the correct grant numbers for the awards you received for your study in the ‘Funding Information’ section.

4. We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide.

5. We note that you have included the phrase “data not shown” in your manuscript. Unfortunately, this does not meet our data sharing requirements. PLOS does not permit references to inaccessible data. We require that authors provide all relevant data within the paper, Supporting Information files, or in an acceptable, public repository. Please add a citation to support this phrase or upload the data that corresponds with these findings to a stable repository (such as Figshare or Dryad) and provide and URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers that may be used to access these data. Or, if the data are not a core part of the research being presented in your study, we ask that you remove the phrase that refers to these data.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: In the current study the authors investigated the effect of exercise in combination with HCTZ in ovariectomized SHRs. The animal experiment mimics a relevant clinical situation in which postmenopausal females are at higher risk of arterial hypertension and subsequent hypertension-dependent end-organ damage.

The strength of the study is the analysis of the effect of exercise on autonomic cardiovascular control. It is important to show that this exercise effect is not only stable in co-treatment with HCTZ but also slightly more improved in the combination. As expected this goes along with reduced inflammation in the heart. The weakness of the current study is the lack of any endo-organ functional data such as heart function (LVEF etc) or renal function (like proteinuria etc.). It is also important to make clearer that the BP was not reduced in exercise performing rats but the age-dependent further increase was attenuated. Thus, exercise contributes to the subsequent further development of hypertension and related disease but is not sufficient to reduce blood pressure. In the clinical meta-analysis cited in the study (Ref. 15) all exercise performing patients had a reduced body weight and were over-weight. Therefore, unlike the well conducted animal study here, this reference is misleading and does also not share the common view of the literature in which a blood pressure reducing effect of SHRs is more critically discussed.

Main points:

N numbers of animals are slightly different per group. This suggests that individual animals were removed from further analysis. Please state in the study why this was done.

An interesting point not further mentioned or discussed by the reviewers is the lack of effect of exercise on IL6 expression. Is this because exercise performing SHRs had slightly bigger hearts?

Body weights and heart weights are reported. Unfortunately, the heart weight is properly wrong because a heart weight of 0.7 mg for an SHR is unlikely. The study would further benefit from a report of normalized heart weights to body weight (if possible also to tibia length which would be more accurate). This is really informative as there are no further reports about the heart function.

It remains unclear what the information about SOD in cardiac tissue should explain. Is this SOD2 or SOD1 or both and what about SOD in plasma.

A limitation of the study is the lack of inflammatory markers in plasma as hypertension affects blood vessels.

Reviewer #2: The paper entitled “Concurrent exercise training induces additional benefits to hydrochlorothiazide: evidence for improve on autonomic control and oxidative stress in hypertensive rats” is very interesting. So, I will give you the opportunity to revise some points before resubmitting to the journal.

Title: “Concomitant exercise training induces additional benefits to hydrochlorothiazide: evidence to improve autonomic control and oxidative stress in hypertensive rats”. There is an important point to be noted in the title that was not addressed, which would be postmenopausal hypertensive rats, not just hypertensive rats. I believe that as this study is based on looking for additional effects of HCTZ training in postmenopausal hypertensive animals, this should be considered when writing the title.

Abstract

Objective: “Although hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) is commonly prescribed to treat high blood pressure (BP), its role in restoring BP regulatory mechanisms is debatable”. “We focused to evaluate whether physical training could contribute to a better modulation of neurohumoral mechanisms in postmenopausal rats treated with HCTZ”. This session you should be more objective and less introductory to your topic.

Another point, the term high arterial pressure (AP) is not the ideal way to address arterial hypertension, because of the differences in having high blood pressure and being hypertensive. I suggest you review this concept.

Methods: “Spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) were distributed into sedentary (S) and ovariectomized groups: sedentary alone (OS), treated with HCTZ alone (OSH), trained alone (OT) or combined with HCTZ (OTH).” improve this sentence, as it is not well understood whether all animals are from the SHR model or the ovariectomized animals are normotensive, explain the number of animals and days of life. Given the name sedentary to the untrained SHR group, is not the correct word to say, because animals, even if not trained, can generate energy expenditure inside the cage, for example, so the most correct name, can only be the hypertensive group or hypertensive control/no intervention group. For the sedentary alone (OS) group, ovariectomized hypertensive patients seem to be more correct. What techniques were used to evaluate your objective? needs to be introduced to make more sense of the methods.

Keywords: "cardiovascular prevention", prevention or treatment, your animals already have hypertension and are being treated with hydrochlorothiazide, the use of the word prevention generates verbal disagreement with your methodology.

Introduction

It needs to be redone, the mechanisms studied in the article were not addressed in the introduction, what is the importance and influence of arterial hypertension on inflammation and oxidative stress? What does this imply in the regulation of autonomic mechanisms? How can the drug hydrochlorothiazide and exercise act on the regulation pathways of these autonomic and vasoconstrictor control mechanisms of arterial hypertension?

The use of acronyms in your article is not following the standards of publication with high blood pressure. 1- Arterial hypertension (HTN) this designation is incorrect the abbreviation HTN refers to hypertension in general, the more correct abbreviation term would be Arterial Hypertension (AH), emphasizing the type of hypertension studied. 2- arterial pressure (AP) or high arterial pressure (AP), is using the same abbreviation for two different things, in addition, if designating arterial hypertension as high arterial pressure is incorrect, because a person or animal that has arterial pressure high does not necessarily have the cardiovascular comorbidity of arterial hypertension.

In the sentence "The hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), a thiazide diuretic, has been one of the initial classes recommended in monotherapy or combined with other ntihypertensive drugs, being widely used in clinical practice", is this treatment recommended by whom? Does this information come from a guideline? What recommended dose? How many times a day can everyone take this medication? Improve the phrase and refer to it to provide scientific support.

In this sentence: "promoting significant clinical reduction around −12 and −6 mmHg for SAP and DAP, respectively (15)" the acronyms SAP and DAP were not described or mentioned earlier in the text, what do they mean?

In the sentence: "Despite this, exercise training induced chronic AP reduction is associated with adaptations in key AP control mechanisms such as autonomic, humoral, inflammation, and oxidative stress (17–21)". Necessary to be rewritten, for better emphasis and importance to the exercise. How does this happen? Which mechanism? Why study the baroreflex? Why study TNF-alpha, interleukins 6 (IL-6) and 10 (IL-10), how exercise modulates the pathway in hypertension? What is the importance of exercise in the redox state, does it decrease the increase of anti and pró oxidative enzymes? How is exercise related to vasoconstrictor or vasorelaxant mechanisms? How will all this together with hydrochlorothiazide treatment be beneficial? These points should be considered to base the objectives of your article, as they are mechanisms already studied and of great importance in the modulation of exercise and arterial hypertension.

Another point not addressed by the authors, what is the influence of hormone deprivation induced by ovariectomized hypertension?

Methodology

In this sentence: "Female spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) (150-200g, 90 days old) were obtained from Nove de Julho University (UNINOVE) (Sao Paulo, Brazil) and randomly allocated into (n=7−8 rats each group) sedentary (S), ovariectomized sedentary (OS), ovariectomized sedentary treated with hydrochlorothiazide (OSH), ovariectomized trained (OT) and ovariectomized trained and treated with hydrochlorothiazide (OTH)." Suggestion already mentioned about the denomination sedentary to groups not trained in physical exercise.

Why did the authors use young rats aged 90 days (~12-13 weeks old) instead of older animals, which are already considered models of hypertension and postmenopause? Fortepiane (2002) suggests that 18-month-old postmenopausal rats, but not ovariectomized rats, may be a suitable model for the study of postmenopausal hypertension. Furthermore, SHR rats reach a stable level of hypertension at around 17-19 weeks of age, so why use ~12-13-week rats? Where have animals of other ages been examined in previous studies? Ref: Lourdes A. Fortepiani et al, (2002) - Characterization of an Animal Model of Postmenopausal Hypertension in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats - https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.0000046924.94886. EF Hypertension. 2003;41:640–645.

"Pharmacological treatment was performed using hydrochlorothiazide (Sanofi Medley Farmacêutica, Campinas, SP, Brasil), an antihypertensive drug corresponding to thiazide diuretics class, at a dose of 30 mg/kg/day. According to our pilot study conducted previously, this dose during 1 wk showed sufficient to promote an AP reduction of approximately 10−12 mmHg in ovariectomized SHR", previously published scientific and methodological support is necessary, this dose or another has possibly already been used by other authors, who sought the purpose of treating arterial hypertension.

"The hydrochlorothiazide tablet was macerated, diluted in drinking (filtered) water, and then was made available for consumption" where has this methodology been applied before? What is the treatment efficiency of this injection method? How was the exact injection of 30 mg/kg/day controlled, since there were 2-4 animals per box and how each one consumed the exact dose stipulated by the authors? Is this method better than the commonly used gavage administration?

Did the authors consider the half-life of the drug hydrochlorothiazide used in this study? The half-life of administration of a single dose of hydrochlorothiazide varies between 6 and 9 hours, with a peak effect between the first 4 and 6 hours of injection, with a maximum total duration of 12 hours, when considering interval doses, which are composed of two daily doses half-life ranges from 8 to 15 hours, with peak effect not determined, duration of effect 16 to 24 hours. But the animals ingested varying amounts of water with the compound during the day, how is the efficiency of this treatment ensured? It was described by the authors "The daily consumption was monitored and then considered to adjust the amount of water for the groups undergo to the drug treatment." Does this method ensure that all animals consume 30 mg/kg/day? How this was done, I need better explanations of this method.

Extensive revision would be necessary in view of the abbreviations used in the manuscript, as many of them are mentioned without using the full name, thus making reading unfeasible.

In the topic " Inflammatory mediators", How was the tissue prepared for the analysis of inflammatory gauges, as the authors only describe that the heart was collected and that a commercially available ELISA kit (R&D Systems Inc.) was used to assess levels of TNF-alpha and interleukins 6 (IL-6) and 10 (IL-10) in cardiac tissue using microplate method. Was the tissue homogenized? Was it used in its entirety? How were these samples processed?

These sentences "The recorded data were analyzed on a beat-to-beat basis to quantify changes in SAP, diastolic (DAP), mean AP (MAP), and HR (19,22).", due to not using correct abbreviations without prior description, it is not known the purpose of the technique or what data it provides.

There is a lack of a topic that addresses anthropometry used in this study, listing which organs were collected and processed, since in view of the results, the authors exchanged data on animal weights, orb weight, adipose tissue weight, and none of this is listed in the methodology of this study.

Results and discussion

In all the topics present in the discussion, I advise the authors to start the paragraphs, explaining the importance of the analysis and the reason for it, so that they have a more fluid line of reasoning. As an example in the topic "Baroreflex sensitivity " the authors start the topic as follows: "Both trained groups (OT and OTH) presented an increased bradycardic response to phenylephrine compared with the OS group (OT: −1.3 ± 0.4 and OTH: −1.6 ± 0.3 vs. OS: −0.6± 0.3 bpm/mmHg) (p < 0.001)", the die is just thrown in the topi without a beginning of content, it would be more fluid if it started " before the analysis of the sensitivity of the baroflex, we could notice that ..."

In front of the topic "Anthropometry", in this topic the sutores present the results in a descriptive way, saying for example "However, weight gain during the study was higher in rats treated with HCTZ alone (OSH vs. S group)", but they do not present the values nor how much was the difference between the groups, I suggest identifying in percentage for example. The data in this topic are being sent as supplementary material, however I think it necessary to add the table as solid manuscript results, as they are discussed in the next topic. In the same table of the supplementary material for data on muscles such as soleus and Plantaris, which, when discussed in the topic, are described only as skeletal muscle, I suggest that they be listed, since each of these muscles has a different function and has different metabolisms, they are activated differently in each of the types of exercises performed in this present study.

This topic needs to be rewritten so that it can resemble the others, together with its data it should appear during the topic and not as supplementary material.

In the topic "Tests of maximum exercise", the following sentence: "For the maximal running test, there were time (p < 0.001), group (p < 0.021) and interaction effects (p < 0.001). " Needs modifications, as cannot be understood, it was not possible to understand the intention and function of the sentence.

In this same topic, I suggest that the figure in front of these data are not explained through supplementary material, I believe that these data are of great value for the consolidation and understanding of the results exposed here, being part of the main data of your study.

In the topic "Tail plethysmography", I once again reinforce the need to verify all the acronyms present in this article, so that each one of them is fully described.

In the discussion the authors say "However, we found that the non-exercised HCTZ-treated group gained more body weight and had more white adipose tissue weight (see S1 Table). In contrast, body weight gain and white adipose tissue were similar in control and trained groups, suggesting that the edication approach can induce anthropometric changes even in the absence of increased feed intake", how is it possible to explain weight gain in the non-exercised HCTZ-treated group, considering that food consumption did not show differences? organism, by which route would the amount of adipose tissue increase?

The paragraphs "HCTZ has been linked to metabolic disorders, such as insulin resistance and fat storage (12). In our study, we did not ..." and "Performance in the treadmill exercise test improved in both trained groups, as previously reported (18), but sig ...", do not have a discussion, not the explanation of the mechanism, the authors only report again the data found. In this discussion topic it is necessary that the data be compared with others found in the literature.

Following the discussion, the authors say: "he initial dose chosen in monotheraphy to achieve adequate control of AP using HCTZ in hypertensive individuals is 25mg daily. Inadequate AP control after medication treatment, on the other hand, is common, and strategies such as increasing the dose and/or frequency, concurrent use of diuretics, or combination with other classes of antihypertensive are used." Who recommends these doses? Why is it necessary to change the dose? how does it affect increasing the daily dose or fractioning it for example? These responses are very important to support the choice of dose used in this article, what do the guidelines for the treatment of arterial hypertension say about this drug, what is the best dose, what frequency? are essential answers to be addressed in the present study and in the present discussion.

In this paragraph " The baroreceptor reflex regulates moment-to-moment the AP and plays a key role for maintaining cardiovascular homeostasis. Exercise training has previously been shown to improve baroreflex sensitivity in female ovariectomized rats (17,18,22). In the present study, we showed that ovariectomy reduced the tachycardic responses of baroreflex sensitivity. However, CET alone or combined with HCTZ improved both bradycardic and tachycardic responses of baroreflex sensitivity. The bradycardic response is more vagal dependent, while the tachycardic responses is more sympathetic-dependent. The increase and decrease of the vagal and sympathetic activity, respectively, has been cumulatively supported as a positive adaptation to exercise training. We hypothesize that improvements in vagal modulation, as measured by the increase in HF band and indirectly assessed by HRV, contributed to improvements in bradycardic responses. Although our study found no improvement in vagal modulation in the OT group as measured by HRV, it is possible that CET alone increased vagal tonus to the heart (32), as evidenced by the expressive resting bradycardia seen in the OT group. In the same way, it is possible that reduction in cardiac, vascular and overall sympathetic contribution, as verified by the reduction of the LF-PI (OTH group), LF-SAP (OT and OTH groups) and the lower reduction of the MAP after hexamethonium injection (OTH group), respectively, support the enhanced tachycardic responses". on the reflex baroreceptor? How does deprivation of hormones impact on the reflex baroreceptor? How does exercise along with pharmacological treatment impact on the reflex baroreceptor?

In the following sentence "However, the influence of the HCTZ on sympathetic activity are inconsistent. HCTZ has been related to increased response to supine and upright MSNA (34)." What would MSNA be? Once again here I say, it would take an extensive review of the abbreviations. Also, does this sentence make no sense? Does it need to be rewritten?

The following sentence "HTN is associated with end-organ damage. Although AP level management is the focus of treatment, its variability is another factor that requires attention due to its contribution to end-organ damage. High APV has been linked to decreased and increased cardiac (39) and renal function (39) and injury (40), as well as all-cause mortality (41)." This is displaced from the discussion, after introductory data, and does not enter the scope of the article when we stop to think about results related to this work.

The authors need to correct the references, as some are non-standard or follow different formats, for example in the sentence "We previously show that anti-inflammatory cytokines after ovariectomy, and that aerobic and resistance exercise training improved renal and that aerobic and resistance exercise training improved renal 18 and cardiac inflammation in ovariectomized SHR (18,20)."

" Considering the anti-inflammatory effect of exercise inseveral diseases that has been widely described in the literature (44), and based on ourdata, it is plausible to speculate that exercise training contributed more to this adaptation in the OTH group than HCTZ", Which cytokines? what mechanisms? how does aerobic or anaerobic exercise modulate these anti-inflammatory pathways? How is this important for arterial hypertension?

The authors wrote that "We found high pro-oxidant (NADPH oxidase) reduced antioxidant CAT enzyme activity and increased protein damage (carbonyls) in cardiac tissue of the OS group", however the phrase is meaningless, making it difficult to understand, I believe it is a problem in the translation from English, it would be necessary to correct the English in relation to this manuscript.

"Evidence evaluating the effect of HCTZ on oxidative stress showed inconsistent findings." Where was this published? Which authors?

"Importantly, CET combined with HCTZ reduced NADPH oxidase and hydrogen peroxide, enhanced CAT, SOD and GPx activities and decreased protein oxidation in cardiac tissue." What mechanism of activation of these enzymes in the face of the redox state induced by physical exercise?

"Inflammatory mediators are known to active pro-oxidants and influence redox balance. In this regard, the current study found that an increase in cardiac IL-10/TNF-α was associated with lower protein oxidation levels. ." Here the authors resumed saying the same thing as said above, about inflammation and the redox state, it would be better to unite the paragraphs and generate more links between these data.

"Antihypertensive medications have greater hypotensive effects at higher doses. Their side effects, however, are dose proportional. About this, tolerability may be compromised, and the individual may choose to discontinue treatment in the long run." Who described this previously? Where is it published? What do the guidelines say about?

Finally, I leave the following points as needs of this article, in addition to those already highlighted above:

1- correction of acronyms

2- English correction

3- Improvement of the discussion, as it seems like an instruction, as there is no discussion with data already published in the literature

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2023 Aug 7;18(8):e0289715. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289715.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


16 Jun 2023

The authors would like to thank the reviewers for their valuable comments. We carefully considered all of the suggestions and accomplished with all of the requests within the aim and possibilities of the present study. The responses to the questions are in the file 'Response to Reviewers', attached along with the revised article.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Michael Bader

20 Jul 2023

PONE-D-23-10192R1Concurrent exercise training induces additional benefits to hydrochlorothiazide: evidence for improve on autonomic control and oxidative stress in a model of hypertension and postmenopausePLOS ONE

Dear Dr. De Angelis,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. The new title is grammatically incorrect since "improve" is a verb. Suggestion: Concurrent exercise training induces additional benefits to hydrochlorothiazide: evidence for an improvement of autonomic control and oxidative stress in a model of

hypertension and postmenopause

Please submit your revised manuscript by Sep 03 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Michael Bader

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: I have no further comments. However, the authors may take more attention on limitations of their study and remind that IL6 is a myokine rather than a pro-inflammatory cytokine in the context of execise.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2023 Aug 7;18(8):e0289715. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289715.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


20 Jul 2023

The authors would like to thank the Academic Editor and Reviewer for their important considerations. We considered the suggestions for the present study. Responses are provided below, and changes made in the manuscript are highlighted.

Academic Editor:

The new title is grammatically incorrect since "improve" is a verb. Suggestion: Concurrent exercise training induces additional benefits to hydrochlorothiazide: evidence for an improvement of autonomic control and oxidative stress in a model of hypertension and postmenopause.

We appreciate the important observation of the Academic Editor. We rewrote the new title following the suggestion.

Reviewer #1:

I have no further comments. However, the authors may take more attention on limitations of their study and remind that IL6 is a myokine rather than a pro-inflammatory cytokine in the context of exercise.

We appreciate the valuable comments from the reviewer. We acknowledge the potential limitations as well as the strengths of our study. At this time, we will consider the comments to further enhance our results and interpretations.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 2

Michael Bader

24 Jul 2023

Concurrent exercise training induces additional benefits to hydrochlorothiazide: evidence for an improvement of autonomic control and oxidative stress in a model of hypertension and postmenopause

PONE-D-23-10192R2

Dear Dr. De Angelis,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Michael Bader

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Michael Bader

28 Jul 2023

PONE-D-23-10192R2

Concurrent exercise training induces additional benefits to hydrochlorothiazide: evidence for an improvement of autonomic control and oxidative stress in a model of hypertension and postmenopause

Dear Dr. De Angelis:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Prof. Michael Bader

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Systolic arterial pressure assessed by tail plethysmography.

    (DOCX)

    S1 Table. Correlation analysis involving all studied groups.

    (DOCX)

    S1 File

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES