Skip to main content
The British Journal of Ophthalmology logoLink to The British Journal of Ophthalmology
. 1986 Mar;70(3):214–220. doi: 10.1136/bjo.70.3.214

Effects on perceptual development of visual deprivation during infancy.

T L Lewis, D Maurer, H P Brent
PMCID: PMC1040970  PMID: 3954980

Abstract

We measured three aspects of vision in children treated for unilateral congenital cataract: visual resolution, the symmetry of optokinetic nystagmus (OKN), and peripheral vision. Good visual resolution was achieved by children who had had the earliest treatment and who had had the normal eye patched close to 50% of the waking time throughout early childhood. All children treated for unilateral congenital cataract showed a marked asymmetry of OKN regardless of the age of treatment. One child with early treatment who could be tested with the Goldmann perimeter also showed especially poor sensitivity in the nasal visual field of her aphakic eye. We found no such deficits in the vision of children who had had normal visual experience during early infancy and then later developed cataracts in one or both eyes. The limitations observed in children treated for congenital cataract are similar to those reported in normal human infants, in normal kittens, and in cats which were visually deprived early in life.

Full text

PDF
214

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Braun J. J., Gault F. P. Monocular and binocular control of horizontal optokinetic nystagmus in cats and rabbits. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1969 Sep;69(1):12–16. doi: 10.1037/h0027887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Frisén L., Glansholm A. Optical and neural resolution in peripheral vision. Invest Ophthalmol. 1975 Jul;14(7):528–536. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Giffin F., Mitchell D. E. The rate of recovery of vision after early monocular deprivation in kittens. J Physiol. 1978 Jan;274:511–537. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hof-Van Duin J. V. Early and permanent effects of monocular deprivation on pattern discrimination and visuomotor behavior in cats. Brain Res. 1976 Jul 30;111(2):261–276. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(76)90771-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lewis T. L., Maurer D., Blackburn K. The development of young infants' ability to detect stimuli in the nasal visual field. Vision Res. 1985;25(7):943–950. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(85)90205-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Malach R., Strong N., Van Sluyters R. C. Analysis of monocular optokinetic nystagmus in normal and visually deprived kittens. Brain Res. 1981 Apr 6;210(1-2):367–372. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(81)90911-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Maurer D., Lewis T. L. A physiological explanation of infant's early visual development. Can J Psychol. 1979 Dec;33(4):232–252. doi: 10.1037/h0081723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Naegele J. R., Held R. The postnatal development of monocular optokinetic nystagmus in infants. Vision Res. 1982;22(3):341–346. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(82)90149-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Schmidt D., Reuscher A., Kommerell G. Uber das nasale Gesichtsfeld bei Strabismus fixus divergens. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol. 1971;183(2):97–104. doi: 10.1007/BF00407174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Schor C. M., Levi D. M. Disturbances of small-field horizontal and vertical optokinetic nystagmus in amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1980 Jun;19(6):668–683. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Sireteanu R., Maurer D. The development of the kitten's visual field. Vision Res. 1982;22(9):1105–1111. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(82)90074-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Van Hof-Van Duin J. Direction preference of optokinetic responses in monocularly tested normal kittens and light deprived cats. Arch Ital Biol. 1978 Sep;116(3-4):471–477. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES