Skip to main content
The British Journal of Ophthalmology logoLink to The British Journal of Ophthalmology
. 1986 Mar;70(3):221–226. doi: 10.1136/bjo.70.3.221

Critical evaluation of the NR-1000F Auto Refractometer.

S Ghose, B K Nayak, J P Singh
PMCID: PMC1040971  PMID: 3954981

Abstract

The manifest (dry) refractions of 165 eyes of 86 patients, aged 6 to 75 years, were studied on the Nikon Auto Refractometer NR-1000F. The results obtained were compared with the clinical refractive data, and they were analysed for degree of agreement of various refractive components in different types and grades of refractive errors in the separate age groups. On the NR-1000F the spherical and cylindrical components and spherical equivalents skewed towards more minus (or less plus), especially so in emmetropes, low hypermetropes, and low myopes. This error declined with increasing age over 40 years and was also significantly lower in aphakia and mixed astigmatism. Determination of cylinder axis was found to be reliable on the NR-1000F. In spite of the obvious utility of the device its inbuilt automatic fogging system does not seem adequately to neutralise the patient's accommodative efforts, as the fixation target probably induces instrument myopia.

Full text

PDF
221

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bannon R. E. A new automated subjective optometer. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1977 Jul;54(7):433–438. doi: 10.1097/00006324-197707000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Drance S. M., Mitchell D. W., Schulzer M. Studies of an automatic refraction machine. Can J Ophthalmol. 1975 Oct;10(4):462–468. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dyson C. A clinical study of the autorefractor, an antomatic refracting device. Can J Ophthalmol. 1977 Jan;12(1):29–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Guyton D. L. Editorial: Automated refraction. Invest Ophthalmol. 1974 Nov;13(11):814–818. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Pappas C. J., Anderson D. R., Briese F. W. Clinical evaluation of the 6600 Autorefractor. Arch Ophthalmol. 1978 Jun;96(6):993–996. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1978.03910050517001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Pappas C. J., Anderson D. R., Briese F. W. Is the Autorefractor reading closest to manifest refraction? A comparison of the patient's previous spectacles and the 6600 Autorefractor reading. Arch Ophthalmol. 1978 Jun;96(6):997–998. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1978.03910050521002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Perrigin D. M., Perrigin J., Grosvenor T. A clinical evaluation of the american optical SR III subjective refractor. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1981 Jul;58(7):581–589. doi: 10.1097/00006324-198107000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Polse D. A., Kerr K. E. An automatic objective optometer. Description and clinical evaluation. Arch Ophthalmol. 1975 Mar;93(3):225–231. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1975.01010020233013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES