Skip to main content
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases logoLink to PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
. 2023 Jul 28;17(7):e0011050. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011050

Compendium of medically important snakes, venom activity and clinical presentations in Ghana

Justus Precious Deikumah 1, Robert Peter Biney 2, John Koku Awoonor-Williams 3, Mawuli Kotope Gyakobo 4,*
Editor: Wuelton M Monteiro5
PMCID: PMC10411737  PMID: 37506181

Abstract

Background

Snake bite envenoming (SBE) is one neglected tropical disease that has not received the needed attention. The sequelae of burdensome disability and mortality impact the socioeconomic life of communities adversely with little documentation of SBE in health facility records in Ghana. This study details SBE and snake distribution, habits/habitats, type of venom expressed and clinical manifestations.

Methodology

We conducted a structured thematic desk review of peer reviewed papers, books and reports from repositories including PubMed, World Health Organization (WHO) and Women’s & Children’s Hospital (WCH) Clinical Toxinology Resources using bibliographic software EndNote and search engine Google Scholar with the following key words; snakes, medical importance, snake bites, venom and venom type, envenomation, symptoms and signs, vaccines, venom expenditure, strike behaviour and venom-metering + Ghana, West Africa, Africa, World. We also reviewed data from the District Health Information Management System (DHIMS) of the Ghana Health Service (GHS). Outcome variables were organized as follows: common name (s), species, habitat/habit, species-specific toxin, clinical manifestation, antivenom availability, WHO category.

Findings

Snake bites and SBE were grouped by the activity of the expressed venom into neurotoxic, cardiotoxic, haemorrhagic, cytotoxic, myotoxic, nephrotoxic and procoagulants. Neurotoxic snake bites were largely due to elapids. Expressed venoms with cardiotoxic, haemorrhagic, nephrotoxic and procoagulant activities principally belonged to the family Viperidae. Snakes with venoms showing myotoxic activity were largely alien to Ghana and the West African sub-region. Venoms showing cytotoxic activity are expressed by a wide range of snakes though more prevalent among the Viperidae family. Snakes with neurotoxic and haemorrhagic venom activities are prevalent across all the agro-ecological zones in Ghana.

Conclusion/Significance

Understanding the characteristics of snakes and their venoms is useful in the management of SBE. The distribution of snakes by their expressed venoms across the agro-ecological zones is also instructive to species identification and diagnosis of SBE.

Author summary

We observed rudimentary data on snake bites and a paucity of venom characterization in the health records of patients in health facilities in Ghana. Knowledge of the distribution of snake species across the agro-ecological zones of the country was also limited. We set out to complement this data by doing a structured thematic desk review of peer reviewed papers, books and reports from repositories including PubMed, WHO and the District Health Information Management System (DHIMS) of the Ghana Health Service (GHS).

Our findings revealed that, snake bites were largely grouped according to the activity of the expressed venom into neurotoxic, cardiotoxic, haemorrhagic, cytotoxic, myotoxic and in some documentations nephrotoxic and procoagulants. Neurotoxic snake bites were largely due to cobras and mambas. Snake expressing venoms with cardiotoxic, haemorrhagic, nephrotoxic and procoagulant activities were principally vipers. Snakes with venoms showing myotoxic activity were largely alien to Ghana and the West African sub-region. Venoms showing cytotoxic activity are expressed by a wide range of snakes though more prevalent among vipers.

In Ghana, snakes expressing venoms with neurotoxic and haemorrhagic activities are prevalent across all the agro-ecological zones of the country. We identified 3 antivenoms registered by the Ghana Food and Drug Authority.

1 Introduction

Snakes are seen as cryptograms of fear and discomfort to human societies throughout the ages due to the danger associated with their bites as well as misconceptions about their biology and behaviour. Global annual reports of snake bites exceed 5 million according to WHO [1]. While a respectable number of snake bites are not venomous [2] envenoming from venomous bites accounts for more than one-third of this global incidence resulting in significant morbidity including amputations and permanent disabilities and death [1].

Snake bites remain a neglected emergency in tropical Africa due to low awareness of snake bites as a public health problem in many of these countries [3,4]. An estimated 435,000 to 580,000 snake bites occur in Africa annually that need treatment [1]. Snake envenoming affects women, children and farmers in poor rural communities in low- and middle-income countries but the highest burden occurs in countries where health systems are weakest and medical resources rudimentary [1]. Hospital-based data from only sub-Saharan Africa puts incidence at 56.4/100,000 and mortality at 1.35/100,000 inhabitants in rural areas [5,6]. In most instances, this data is only a microcosm of actual snake bite data as the reported data is largely from a few parts in Africa noted for notoriously high rates of snake bites [7]. For example an estimation in northern Ghana reported snakebite incidence of 56.4/100,000 and mortality at 1.35/100,000 inhabitants [8].

Management of venomous snake bites require timely use of appropriate pharmacological interventions including the use of antivenoms to minimize the progression of tissue damage and systemic toxicity. Although efficacious antivenom exists, the capacity to produce is a challenge for most regions where snake bites and snake envenomation is endemic while existing manufacturers of snake antivenom are gradually scaling down [9]. Compounding these challenges is the proliferation of poor quality antivenoms available in these areas. This coupled with the fact that there should be separate antivenoms for different families of snakes makes the situation dire and gravely affect access to treatment [9,10].

In Northern Ghana, there were an estimated 86 envenomings and 24 deaths/100,000/year caused mainly by Echis ocellatus [5] while other studies in the Brong-Ahafo Region of Ghana found snakebite incidence of 92/100,000 [11]. Emerging from these studies is that, complete epidemiological data on snakebites are inadequate suggesting that most cases are never reported. This may be due to lack of confidence in the medical system for inadequately treating snake bite envenoming (SBE), poorly resourced health facilities in handling SBE or dearth in competence among health workers in recognizing and characterizing SBE and affording appropriate treatment. The myths and traditional belief systems in some communities may as well have exacerbated the challenges associated with this public health emergency.

In Ghana, the electronic repository, District Health Information Management System (DHIMS) of the Ghana Health Service captures snakebites data without envenomation characteristics and venom specific diagnoses probably because this data is lacking in health care facilities due to inadequate knowledge in the epidemiology of snakes, snake bites and the types of envenomation with their clinical manifestation. This impacts on the quality of care for snake bite victims. Understanding the clinical manifestation of SBE and associated snake type could reduce the unnecessary use of polyvalent anti snake sera with its concomitant side effects.

This study seeks to fill this gap with a structured thematic desk review that characterizes medically important snakes by name, ecology, habitat, distribution, associated venom type expressed, clinical presentations and snake antivenom availability in Ghana and the West African sub-region. This knowledge when available, will improve diagnosis of snake bites and ultimately enhance treatment of snake bite envenomation in Ghana and the west Africa sub-region. Information provided in this paper will significantly improve the understanding of snakes and their behaviour, snakebite types and the management of snakebites as well as the quality of data captured into the electronic database of Ghana’s District Health Information Management System (DHIMS).

2 Methods

2.1. Study area

The Republic of Ghana, is a country in West Africa (7.9465° N, 1.0232° W) that spans the Gulf of Guinea and the Atlantic Ocean to the south, and shares borders with the Ivory Coast in the west, Burkina Faso in the north, and Togo in the east (Fig 1). Ghana covers an area of 238,535 km2 (92,099 sq mile), spanning diverse biomes that range from coastal savannas to tropical rainforests. With a population of 30.8 million people, Ghana is the second-most populous country in West Africa, after Nigeria. Over 43% of Ghana’s population resides in the rural parts of the country with slightly more males (51%) than females (49%) [12]. The main economic activity of the rural poor inhabitants is subsistence agriculture while over 11% of the total population of the country earn less than 2 USD per day which is below the poverty line [13].

Fig 1. Snakebite incidence distribution hotspot Map of Ghana.

Fig 1

Data source: Demographic Health Information Management System (DHIMS) of the Ghana Health Service (GHS)– 2013–2021.

The climate of Ghana is tropical with a warm and dry eastern coastal belt, a hot and humid south-west corner and hot and dry northern belt [14]. There are two main seasons: wet and dry. With the global climate change, the north of Ghana experiences the rainy season from April to mid-October while in the south its rainy season is from March to mid-November. The harmattan, a dry desert wind, blows in north-east Ghana from December to March, lowering the humidity and causing hotter days and cooler nights in the northern part of Ghana. Average daily temperatures range from 30°C (86°F) during the day to 24°C (75°F) at night with a relative humidity between 77% and 85%. In the southern part of Ghana, there is a bi-modal rainy season: April through June and September through November. Storms occur in the northern part of Ghana during March and April, followed by occasional rain until August and September, when the rainfall reaches its peak. Rainfall ranges from 78 to 216 cm (31 to 85 inches) a year. These variations in weather and climatic parameters determine agricultural activities in the five agro-ecological zones.

2.2. Data search strategy

Information for this work was mainly gathered from a structured thematic desk review of secondary data. Peer reviewed papers, books and other reference sources were collated from repositories including PubMed, WHO and Women’s & Children’s Hospital (WCH) Clinical Toxinology Resources using bibliographic software EndNote and search engine Google Scholar among others with the following key words; snakes, medical importance, snake bites, venom and venom type, envenomation, symptoms and signs, vaccines, venom expenditure, strike behaviour and venom-metering + Ghana, West Africa, Africa, World (Fig 2). Additionally, data from the Ghana Health Service (GHS)’s District Health Information Management System (DHIMS) spanning from 2013 to 2021 was reviewed for snake bites (Fig 2).

Fig 2. Flow chart showing information gathering process.

Fig 2

Information gathered from these reference sources were grouped into the following outcome variables: Common name (s), Species, Habitat/habit, Species-specific toxin, Clinical manifestation, Antivenom availability, WHO category (Fig 2).

Data management

The information collected was displayed in a matrix according to the following themes: Common name (s), Species, Habitat/habit, Species-specific toxin, Clinical manifestation, Antivenom availability and WHO category. Information was retrieved from multiple sources for comparison and validation along the themes and outcome variables. The matrix was cleaned of irrelevant information or unproven assertions. Final validated information was then grouped in tables along the outcome variables according to the type of venom expressed including, neurotoxin, haemorrhagin, cardiotoxin, myotoxin and cytotoxin. The distribution and type of snakes are displayed in agro-ecological maps of Ghana. Snake types are symbolically displayed in these ecological zones across the country (Fig 3).

Fig 3. Characterisation of medically important snakes in Ghana by name, ecology, habit and distribution patterns.

Fig 3

Data sourced from grey literature and additionally data adapted from Global biodiversity information facility (https://www.gbif.org/). Maps are drawn using shapefiles from free sources (U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) (http://www.usgs.gov)) while icons are sourced from commons.wikimedia.org.

3 Results

3.1: Characterisation of medically important snakes in Ghana and the sub-Region by name, ecology, habit and distribution patterns

3.1.1: African snakes and characteristics of expressed venoms

Snakes of medical importance are usually grouped according to the activity of their expressed venoms. The following groups have been identified, neurotoxic, myotoxic, cardiotoxic, haemorrhagic, procoagulant and cytotoxic (Table 1). Snakes expressing venom with procoagulant activity are sometimes grouped with the haemorrhagic set. Some literature also has nephrotoxic group that clinically manifest as acute kidney injury and are quite often caused by snakes expressing venoms with haemorrhagic activity mostly from the Viperidae family.

Table 1. African snakes and characteristics of expressed venoms [2,1522].
Venom activity Clinical manifestation African snake responsible
Neurotoxicity Local symptoms: parasthesias, neuropathic pain
Systemic symptoms: Ptosis, external ophthalmoplegia, facial paralysis, paralysis of tongue, inability to open mouth, bulbar and respiratory paralysis
Venom ophthalmia: pain, hyperemia, blepharitis, blepharospasm and corneal erosions
Elapids (e.g. Cobras, Rinkals, Mambas); Berg adder and Peringuey’s adder, selected Bothrops spp.
Myotoxicity Local symptoms: Swelling /Oedema, subcutaneous bleed
Systemic symptoms: Trismus, stiff painful muscles, myoglobinuria, rhabdomyolysis /muscle necrosis
Sea snake, European adder (Vipera berus), some Viperidae snake bites (selected Bothrops spp.)
Cardiotoxicity Hypotension, cardiogenic shock, arrhythmias with sinus node dysfunction, ECG abnormalities, raised serum/cardiac enzymes with acute myocardial infarction and/ or ischaemia, myocarditis and acute pulmonary oedema Puff Adder and other giant Bitis species, saw scaled vipers (Echis ocellatus)
Haemorrhagic Local symptoms: painful progressive swelling and tissue destruction
Systemic symptoms: Spontaneous systemic haemorrhage (gums, gut, brain, etc) associated with venom-induced consumption coagulopathy
Saw-scaled vipers (Echis ocellatus), puff adder and other large Bitis species, boomslang, Forest vine snake (Thelotornis kirtlandii)
Procoagulant Coagulopathy: incoagulable blood with haematemesis and persistent bleeding from trauma sites and recent wounds Saw-scaled vipers, boomslang (Dispholidus typus), Forest vine snake (Thelotornis kirtlandii)
Cytotoxicity Massive local swelling, blistering, necrosis: extravasation of blood and plasma potentially causing hypovolaemia Puff adder and other large Bitis species, saw-scaled vipers, spitting cobras

The distribution of these medically important snakes by the activity of their expressed venoms across the agro-ecological zones in Ghana is demonstrated in Fig 3. Snakes expressing venoms with haemorrhagic and neurotoxic activities were found to be the most prevalent.

3.2. Characterisation of medically important snakes of Ghana and the West African sub-region, associated expressed venom type and activity with clinical presentations (Tables 26)

Table 2. Snakes species with neurotoxic (Postsynaptic) effects in humans [23, 24].

Species Habitat/habit Other toxins Clinical manifestation Antivenom availability
Forest Cobra (Naja melanoleuca)** Forest, around inhabited areas and near water Cardiotoxins Ptosis, cranial nerve palsies, bulbar and respiratory paralysis (moderate to severe flaccid paralysis). Local effects: pain, severe swelling, bruising, blistering, necrosis FAV-Afrique, SAIMR Polyvalent Antivenom, Antivipmyn Africa, Bivalent Naja / Walterinnesia Snake Antivenom, SAIMR Snakebite Kit
Black-necked spitting cobra (Naja nigricollis)* Moist savanna and
Nocturnal
Necrotoxins+, Cardiotoxins
Flaccid paralysis, severe swelling, bruising, blistering, necrosis, venom spit ophthalmia: kerato-conjuctivitis, corneal ulceration Bivalent Naja / Walterinnesia Snake Antivenom, Antivipmyn Africa, Pan-African antivenom (EchiTAb-Plus-ICP), Polyvalent Snake Venom Antiserum,FAV-Afrique, Favirept
West African brown spitting cobra (Naja katiensis)* Savanna, Diurnal, & arboreal Cardiotoxins Moderate to severe flaccid paralysis
Severe swelling, bruising, blistering and necrosis
Venom spit ophthalmia: kerato-conjuctivitis, corneal ulceration
Bivalent Naja / Walterinnesia Snake Antivenom, Antivipmyn Africa
Senegalese cobra (Naja senegalensis)* Savanna, riparian forests Myotoxins+
Cardiotoxins
Necrotoxins+
Moderate to severe flaccid paralysis
Severe swelling, bruising, blistering and necrosis
FAV-Afrique
Gold’s tree cobra (Pseudohaje goldii)** Forest, woodland, near watercourses, Arboreal & diurnal unknown Insufficient data None presently
Black Tree Cobra (Pseudohaje nigra)** Forest, woodland, near watercourses, Arboreal & diurnal unknown Insufficient data None presently
Western Green Mamba (Dendroaspis viridis)* Forest, thicket and woodland, farms, Diurnal, arboreal Dendrotoxins Fasciculins Flaccid paralysis, neuroexcitation, increased sweating, salivation FAV-Afrique, Antivipmyn Africa

[+ = present but not defined

* = WHO category 1—Highest medically important venomous snakes

** = WHO category 2—Secondary medically important highly venomous snakes]

Table 6. Snake species and myotoxicity in humans.

Scientific name Common name Effect
ELAPIDAE
Micropechis ikaheka New Guinea small eyed snake Moderate systemic myolysis
Micrurus spp. (selected) Selected South American coral snakes Moderate systemic myolysis
Notechis spp. Australian tiger snakes Severe systemic myolysis
Oxyuranus spp. Australian taipans Moderate systemic myolysis
Pseudechis spp. Australian mulga & black snakes Moderate to severe systemic myolysis
Tropidechis carinatus Rough scaled snake Severe systemic myolysis
Various Sea snakes Moderate to severe systemic myolysis
VIPERIDAE
Bothrops spp. (selected) Selected species of South American pit vipers Moderate systemic myolysis
Crotalus spp. (selected) Selected species of South American rattlesnakes Moderate systemic myolysis
Daboia russelii pulchella Sri Lankan Russell’s viper Moderate systemic myolysis

†: Snakes known to have significant systemic myotoxins of medical significance. This list is however not exhaustive.

3.2.1. Snake species with neurotoxic effects in humans

Generally, snake species in Ghana with neurotoxicity effects are cobras and mambas. We found seven different cobras and 1 green mamba that have neurotoxins. The seven cobra species are from the same family, four of which are from the genus Naja and the other 2 from genus Pseudohaje. The green mamba species is the Western Green Mamba also known as the Hallowell’s Green Mamba (Dendroaspis viridis.) The snakes with neurotoxins are found in a variety of habitats that are generally distributed in all agro-ecological zones in Ghana with many of them inhabiting areas near water and dry land (Fig 3). A few are arboreal and nocturnal (Table 2). Most of the toxins expressed in these snakes act post-synaptically to produce clinical symptoms including mild to moderate flaccid paralysis with severe blistering. Out of the seven snakes in this category, there are various specific antivenoms available for all except the Gold’s Tree Cobra (Pseudohaje goldii) and Black Tree Cobra (Pseudohaje nigra). There is indication that at present the specific neurotoxin in these Pseudohaje species remain unknown hence no specific antivenoms available (Table 2). We found that, out of the seven species with neurotoxic effects, 3 of them are listed as WHO category 2 medically important highly venomous snakes capable of causing significant morbidity and death for which exact epidemiological and clinical data is lacking. The remaining 4 belong to Category 1 highest medically important venomous snakes that are widespread and cause numerous snakebites, resulting in highest level of morbidity, disability or mortality. This result suggests that there is antivenom available for WHO Cat 1 species in this group but not the Cat 2 of the Pseudohaje species although their envenomation is highly lethal.

3.2.2. Snake species with cardiotoxic effects in humans

Two principal species were found to possess cardiotoxins in our study, the Variable Burrowing Asp (Atractaspis irregularis) and West African Gaboon Viper (Bitis rhinoceros). Both snake species are common in the forest terrain. When they occur in savanna regions, they are localized to patches of the savanna which are close to the forest regions (Table 3). A cardiotoxin, sarafotoxin, with endothelin-like properties has been isolated from the Variable Burrowing Asp but cardiotoxin associated with West African Gaboon Viper is not yet characterized. However, we found several antivenom products available for this snake species but none available for the Variable Burrowing Asp (Table 3). Bites from these species can cause coagulopathy, infarction, and ischemia.

Table 3. Snake species with cardiotoxic effects in humans [23, 24].
Common name (s) Habitat/habit Species-specific toxin Clinical manifestation Antivenom availability
Variable Burrowing Asp (Atractaspis irregularis)* Tropical and moist forest terrain,
Savanna regions at the edge of forest and at elevations up to about 1800 m.
Fossorial and nocturnal
Cardiotoxins (endothelin-like activity of sarafotoxin)
Necrotoxins
Local pain, swelling, bruising, blistering and necrosis
Ischaemia or infarction
No Antivenoms
Gaboon Viper (Bitis rhinoceros)** Rainforest, secondary forest and forest fringes up to about 2000 metres elevation
Terrestrial, often found in leaf litter where its colour and pattern provide excellent camouflage
Procoagulants (Fibrinogenases)
Anticoagulants
Haemorrhagins (Zinc metalloproteinase)
Cardiotoxins (Present but not defined)
Necrotoxins (Present but not defined)
Cardiotoxicity—coagulopathy haemorrhages
60–80% rate of envenoming
Marked local effects; pain, severe swelling, bruising, blistering
Minor neurotoxic paralysis

FAV-Afrique
Antivipmyn Africa
Polyvalent Snake Venom Antiserum
SAIMR Polyvalent Antivenom SII Polyvalent Antisnake Venom Serum (lyophilized)

[+ = present but not defined

* = WHO category 1—Highest medically important venomous snakes

** = WHO category 2—Secondary medically important highly venomous snakes].

3.2.3. Snake species with haemorrhagic/haematotoxic effects in humans

With regards to snake species that have toxins that are haemorrhagins, we found 5 different species of snakes of which 3 are vipers i.e. the West African Carpet Viper (Echis ocellatus), West African Green Tree Viper, (Atheris chloroechis) and West African Gaboon Viper (Bitis rhinoceros). These three viper species are mostly found in rainforest and forest fringes. The Carpet Viper and Gaboon Viper are terrestrial while the Green Tree Viper is arboreal. Other species in this group includes the Puff adder (Bitis arietans) which is mostly found in the savanna regions and has a terrestrial and nocturnal habit as well as the Boomslang (Dispholidus typus) which is also found in savannah regions but is arboreal in nature. Species in this category have significant moderate to severe coagulating and hemorrhaging effects resulting in severe bleeding after bites and may be associated with severe blistering and pain at bite site (Table 4). It is observed that, there is availability of antivenoms for the species with haemoraghins except the West African Green Tree Viper for which there is no antivenom (Table 4). The Puff adder and the West African Tree Viper are WHO Cat 1 species and are highly lethal. The haemoraghins characterized from these species are mostly zinc metalloproteinases.

Table 4. Snake species with haemorrhagic (haematotoxic) manifestations in humans [23, 24].
Common name Habitat/habit Other toxins Clinical manifestation Antivenom availability
West African Carpet Viper (Echis ocellatus)** Terrestrial, nocturnal and crepuscular Anticoagulants, Nephrotoxins, Mixture of procoagulants, Necrotoxins, Renal complication, secondary to coagulopathy, Marked local effects (pain, severe swelling, bruising, blistering), Moderate to severe necrosis SAIMR Echis Antivenom, FAV-Afrique, Pan-African antivenom (EchiTAb-Plus-ICP), EchiTAbG, Antivipmyn Africa, SAIMR Echis antivenom
West African Green Tree Viper (Atheris chloroechis)* Forest, semi-arid areas, Diurnal and arboreal Severe envenoming possible, potentially lethal, Local pain, swelling, bruising & blistering, Coagulopathy & hemorrhages are uncommon to rare, but may be moderate to severe coagulopathy No Antivenoms
Puff adder (Bitis arietans)* Savanna, nocturnal Procoagulants
Anticoagulants
Nephrotoxins
Necrotoxins+
Marked local effects; pain, severe swelling, bruising, blistering, Moderate to severe local Necrosis, Common, moderate to severe coagulopathy + haemorrhagins causing extensive bleeding, Cardiotoxicity is common and is major clinical effect, Shock secondary to fluid shifts due to local tissue injury is likely in severe cases SAIMR Snakebite Kit, Antivipmyn Africa, Pan-African antivenom (EchiTAb-Plus-ICP), Polyvalent Snake Venom Antiserum, FAV-Afrique, Favirept, SAIMR Polyvalent Antivenom
Gaboon Viper (Bitis rhinoceros)** Forest,
nocturnal
Procoagulants, Fibrinogenases)
Anticoagulants
Cardiotoxins+
Necrotoxins+
Marked local effects; pain, severe swelling, bruising, blistering, Minor neurotoxic paralysis, Coagulopathy & Haemorrhages, very common, coagulopathy + haemorrhagins causing bleeding is major clinical effect, Cardiotoxicity common, FAV-Afrique, Antivipmyn Africa, Polyvalent Snake Venom Antiserum
SAIMR Polyvalent Antivenom SII Polyvalent
Boomslang (Dispholidus typus*) Open bush, savannah, wooded grassland, Diurnal and arboreal Procoagulants
Anticoagulants
Local pain, swelling & bruising
Coagulopathy & Haemorrhages
Common, moderate to severe coagulopathy + haemorrhagins causing extensive bleeding
SAIMR Boomslang Antivenom

[+ = present but not defined

* = WHO category 1—Highest medically important venomous snakes

** = WHO category 2—Secondary medically important highly venomous snakes].

3.2.4. Snake species with procoagulant effects in humans

Snake species with procoagulant toxins identified in the study area included all the species which have haemorrhagins except the West African Green Tree Viper, (Atheris chloroechis). Thus, the West African Carpet Viper (Echis ocellatus), West African Gaboon Viper (Bitis rhinoceros), Puff adder (Bitis arietans) and the Boomslang all have both haemorrhagic and procoagulant toxins (Table 4). These species are mostly found in either savannah or rainforest and forest fringes and are terrestrial in nature except the boomslang Dispholidus typus which is arboreal (Fig 3). Species in this category belong to both WHO Cat 1 and 2 making them highly lethal (Table 4). Cardiotoxicity is widely associated with snake bites from these species due to potential synergistic effects of the procoagulant and hemorrhagic toxins with direct cardiotoxicity.

3.2.5. Snake species with cytotoxic and broad-spectrum toxicity in humans

Several snake species encountered in the study possess toxins with cytotoxic properties and a broad range of toxicity including nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity. These include Rhinoceros Viper (Bitis nasicornis), West African Green Tree Viper, (Atheris chloroechis), West African Carpet Viper (Echis ocellatus), West African Gaboon Viper (Bitis rhinoceros), Puff adder (Bitis arietans), Variable Burrowing Asp, Senegalese cobra and the Boomslang. Their clinical manifestation includes rapid and conspicuous swelling, intense pain, severe shock, and local blistering. The synergistic effects of these broad-acting toxins can result in the patient’s blood becoming incoagulable leading to haematuria, haematemesis, uncoordinated movements, defecation, urination, swelling of the tongue and eyelids and convulsions (Table 5). This is particularly evident in the Rhinoceros Viper (Bitis nasicornis) a CAT 1 species which is a terrestrial and nocturnal snake.

Table 5. Snake species with cytotoxic and broad-range toxicity in humans [23, 24].
Species Habitat/habit Species-specific toxin Clinical manifestation Antivenom availability
West African Carpet Viper (Echis ocellatus)** Terrestrial, nocturnal & crepuscular Mixture of procoagulants, Anticoagulants, Haemorrhagin (Zinc metalloproteinase), Nephrotoxins, Necrotoxins Renal complication, coagulopathy, Marked local effects (pain, severe swelling, bruising, blistering), Moderate to severe necrosis SAIMR Echis Antivenom, FAV-Afrique, Pan-African antivenom (EchiTAb-Plus-ICP), EchiTAbG, Antivipmyn Africa, SAIMR Echis antivenom
West African Green Tree Viper (Atheris chloroechis)* Forest, semi-arid regions,
Diurnal & arboreal
Haemorrhagins
Severe envenoming possible, potentially lethal
Local pain, swelling, bruising & blistering
Coagulopathy & hemorrhages are uncommon to rare, but may be moderate to severe coagulopathy
No Antivenoms
Variable Burrowing Asp (Atractaspis irregularis)* Moist forest, Savanna,
Fossorial & nocturnal
Cardiotoxins (Indirect cardiotoxin (endothelin-like activity of sarafotoxins), Necrotoxins Local pain, swelling, bruising & blistering
Local Necrosis is common but usually not severe
Ischaemia or infarction
No Antivenoms
Puff adder (Bitis arietans)* Savanna & scrubs Procoagulants, Anticoagulants, Haemorrhagins+, Nephrotoxins, Necrotoxins+ 60–80% rate of envenoming
Marked local effects; pain, severe swelling, bruising, blistering
Moderate to severe local Necrosis
Common, moderate to severe coagulopathy + haemorrhagins causing extensive bleeding
Cardiotoxicity is common and is major clinical effect
Shock secondary to fluid shifts due to local tissue injury is likely in severe cases
SAIMR Snakebite Kit, Antivipmyn Africa, Pan-African antivenom (EchiTAb-Plus-ICP), Polyvalent, FAV-Afrique, Favirept, SAIMR, Polyvalent Antivenom
Rhinoceros viper (Bitis nasicornis)** Forest, woodland, nocturnal good swimmer Cytotoxin Rapid and conspicuous swelling, intense pain, severe shock, and local blistering.
Other symptoms include uncoordinated movements, defecation, urination, swelling of the tongue and eyelids, convulsions, and unconsciousness.
Blistering, bruising, and necrosis may be extensive. Sudden hypotension, heart damage, and dyspnoea may occur
The blood may become incoagulable, with internal bleeding that may lead to haematuria and haematemesis
SAIMR Snakebite Kit, Antivipmyn Africa, Pan-African antivenom (EchiTAb-Plus-ICP), Polyvalent Snake Venom Antiserum, SAIMR Polyvalent Antivenom
West African Gaboon Viper (Bitis rhinoceros)** Forest and forest fringes
Procoagulants (Fibrinogenases), Anticoagulants, Haemorrhagins (Zinc metalloproteinase), Cardiotoxins+, Necrotoxins+ Marked local effects; pain, severe swelling, bruising, blistering, Minor neurotoxic paralysis, Coagulopathy & Haemorrhages, very common, coagulopathy + haemorrhagins causing bleeding is major clinical effect, Cardiotoxicity, Common, cardiotoxicity is major clinical effect FAV-Afrique, Antivipmyn Africa
Polyvalent Snake Venom Antiserum
SAIMR Polyvalent Antivenom SII Polyvalent
Boomslang (Dispholidus typus)** Open bush, savanna and sparsely wooded grassland, Diurnal and arboreal Procoagulants, Anticoagulants, Haemorrhagins Local pain, swelling & bruising, Coagulopathy & Haemorrhages, Common, moderate to severe coagulopathy + haemorrhagins causing extensive bleeding SAIMR Boomslang Antivenom

3.2.6: Snake species and myotoxicity in humans

There is insufficient evidence associating sub-Saharan Africa and Ghanaian snake venoms with myotoxins. Available data presently ascribes this toxin to sea snakes including Hydrophis curtus, selected bitis spp., among others (Table 6).

3.3: Anti-Venom availability

Our review identified 15 snake antivenom that have been used in the management of snakebite envenomation, 13 of which are in active production presently (Table 7). We noted that, FAV-Afrique, which is widely used and is touted as the most effective against some medically important snakes prevalent in Ghana and the sub-region, was discontinued by the manufacturer Sanofi Pasteur in 2014. Attempts to re-start production of this antivenom is yet to materialize [25].

Table 7. Anti-snake venom sera availability [2628].

S. No. Type of antivenom Manufacturer Country of origin Status of production currently Snake species Comment
1 FAV-Afrique Sanofi Pasteur France Discontinued in January 2014. Last batch expired in Jan 2016 10 species of the Elapidae and Viperidae families The most highly effective in treating envenoming by Echis ocellatus, the West African saw-scaled viper that causes great morbidity and mortality throughout the West and Central African savannah
MicroPharm Limited acquired product in 2018 and seeking to re-launch it
2 SAIMR Polyvalent Antivenom South African
Vaccine Producers
South Africa Active production B. arietans, B. gabonica, D. angusticeps, D. jamesoni, D. polylepis, H.
haemachatus, N. annulifera, N. melanoleuca, N. mossambica, N. nivea
Considered as the current “Gold Standard” for treating envenomings by many African snake species
3 Antivipmyn Africa Instituto Bioclon / Silanes Mexico Active production B. arietans,
B. gabonica, B. rhinoceros, D. angusticeps, D. jamesoni, D. polylepis, D. viridis,
E. leucogaster, E. ocellatus,
E. pyramidum, N. haje,
N. katiensis, N. melanoleuca, N. nigricollis, N. nivea
4 Bivalent Naja / Walterinnesia Snake Antivenom National Antivenom and Vaccine Production Centre Saudi Arabia Active production N. arabica
N. haje
N. melanoleuca
N. naja
N. nigricollis
N. nivea
Walterinnesia aegyptia
Walterinnesia morgani
5 Pan-African antivenom (EchiTAb-Plus-ICP) Instituto Clodomiro Picado (ICP)
University of Costa Rica
Costa Rica Active production B. arietans,
E. ocellatus,
N. nigricollis
D. polylepis)
N. mossambica
N. annulifera
H. haemachatus
Intact IgG
The expanded-scope EchiTAb + ICP has lower ability to neutralize the venom of B. arietans, but similar ability to neutralize the venoms of D. polylepis, N. mossambica and H. haemachatus
When compared to FAV Afrique and the SVA African antivenoms
6 Snake Venom Antiserum Bharat Serums & Vaccines India B. caeruleus
N. haje
7 Inoserp Pan-Africa Inosan Biopharma Mexico Active production E. ocellatus,
E. leucogaster, E. pyramidum, B. arietans,
B. rhinoceros,
B. nasicornis,
B. gabonica
D. polylepis,
D. viridis,
D. angusticeps, D. jamesoni,
N. nigricollis,
N. melanoleuca, N. haje,
N. pallida
N. nubiae,
N. katiensis N. senegalensis.
Lyophilized
Polyvalent F(ab’)2 Immunoglobulin Fragments (Equine)
8 Favirept Polyvalent Snake Antivenin Sanofi Pasteur France Discontinued B. arietans
C. cerastes
D. deserti
E. leucogaster
N. nigricollis,
N. melanoleuca, N. haje,
9 SII Polyvalent Antisnake
(Snake Antivenom Seum IP)
Serum Institute of India India Active production N. naja
E. carinatus
D. russelii
B. caeruleus
Polyvalent equine antivenom
10 SAIMR Echis Antivenom South African
Vaccine Producers
South Africa Active production E. carinatus,
E. ocellatus,
E. coloratus, Cerastes spp.
11 EchiTAbG MicroPharm United Kingdom Active production Echis ocellatus
12 SAIMR Boomslang Antivenom South African
Vaccine Producers
South Africa Active production Dispholidus typus
13 Snake Venom Antiserum (African)
(AFRIVEN-10)
VINS Bioproducts India In active production B. arietans,
B. gabonica,
E. ocellatus,
E. leucogaster, N. haje,
N. melanoleuca, N. nigricollis,
D. polylepis,
D. viridis,
D. jamesoni.
Lyophilized powder
Polyvalent, enzyme-refined equine antivenom immunoglobulin fragments
14 Snake Venom Antiserum (Pan African)
(PANAF-Premium)
Premium Serums and Vaccines India In active production B. arietans,
B. gabonica,
B. nasicornis,
B. rhinoceros
D. angusticeps, D. jamesoni,
D. polylepis,
D. viridis,
E. carinatus,
E. leucogaster, E. ocellatus,
N. nigricollis,
N. haje,
N. melanoleuca
Lyophilized powder
Polyvalent, enzyme-refined equine antivenom immunoglobulins
15 Anti-Snake Venom Serum Pan Africa [10]
BEAFRIQUE-10
M/s. Biological E India In active production B. arietans,
B. gabonica,
E. ocellatus,
E. leucogaster, N. haje,
N. melanoleuca, N. nigricollis,
D. polylepis,
D. viridis,
D. jamesoni.
Liquid,
Polyvalent, Enzyme refined, Equine F(ab’) immunoglobulin

In Ghana, three antivenoms are registered with the Food and Drug Authority of Ghana [26]. These are Snake Venom Antiserum (African) (AFRIVEN-10), Snake Venom Antiserum (Pan African) (PANAF-Premium) and the Anti-Snake Venom Serum Pan Africa [10] BEAFRIQUE-10. The AFRIVEN-10 and PANAF-Premium are lyophilized powders for reconstitution while BEAFRIQUE-10 is a liquid formulation. All three are polyvalent with PANAF-Premium being the most broadly-acting antivenom with antivenom activity against 14 species belonging to the Bitis, Naja, Dendroaspis and the Echis species. However, none of these three antisera is locally manufactured.

4 Discussion

Climate change is evoking increasing human snake encounters and hence a rise in snake bite incidence [29]. Many of these snakes are however, not venomous and may pass undetected or without signs of envenomation [30]. About a quarter of bites from venomous species do not necessarily result in systemic envenomation [4,16]. The few that may otherwise cause clinical signs and symptoms provide compelling reasons to study their distribution, habit, venom type and expression and clinical manifestation including the pathophysiology of venom action. This is the focus of this paper in guiding clinicians in Ghana and the West African sub-region in the management of snake bites and conservation scientists in protecting snakes from going extinct.

The clinical manifestations of snake bites envenomation albeit rare is broadly based on venom activity classified as neurotoxic, myotoxic, cardiotoxic, haemorrhagic, cytotoxic, procoagulant and nephrotoxic [2,15,31,32]. Envenomation may present with local or systemic clinical features according to the venom type.

Snakes that express neurotoxic venoms are the most prevalent across Ghana though less represented in the Forest-Savanna Transition (FST) zone. Haemorrhagic toxin expressing snakes were just less prevalent than their neurotoxic toxin expressing counterparts but with a marked presence in the FST zone and not very much in the Moist and Wet Evergreen ecological areas of the country. The procoagulant toxin expressing snakes show similar distribution in the FST zone just as the “haemorrhagins” with similar or same species present. Cytotoxic venom expressing species were quite confined to the moist and wet evergreen ecological zones. This distribution is shared by cardiotoxic venom expressing snakes but with additional and limited distribution to deciduous forest and guinea savannah ecological zones.

This distribution pattern may very well provide relevant epidemiological information for identification of snake bite and venom type and can guide clinical management. However, clinicians should interpret this distribution pattern with a lot of care and circumspection as the changing climate may cause a range shift in some of the species. Warmer climates are predicted to help snakes attain the optimum temperatures for digestion and reproduction because they are ectothermic and rely on their surrounding temperatures to provide heat [33]. Studies have found that longer periods of warmer temperatures could give rattle snakes a longer active season with more time to hunt and feed [34].

Envenomation from neurotoxic venom expressing snakes, typically elapids may show any of the following symptoms: vomiting, dizziness, blurred vision, weakness, inability to walk, tightness of the throat and tingling sensation of the body. Eye signs may include palpebral ptosis, ophthalmoplegia and facial muscle weakness. Delafontaine, captured eye signs in what they referred to as venom ophthalmia consisting of “pain, hyperemia, blepharitis, blepharospasm and corneal erosions” [17]. Neurotoxic venoms may also show local signs including numbness/ paresthesia and pain at the site of bite as well as local edema/swelling and erythema.

Bites from neurotoxin-expressing snakes may manifest systemically as muscle weakness, dysphagia, dyspnoea, generalized myalgia, possible neuromuscular paralysis and salivation. It is prudent for the health care team to appreciate the red flags for systemic neurotoxic envenomation including respiratory difficulty/paralysis, bulbar paralysis and respiratory failure. This may require intensive care facilities [3541].

Occasionally, there are unusual presentations such as “transitory loss of taste” as reported by Bucaretchi, et al. [35] and “early morning neuroparalytic syndrome (EMNS)” as described by Anadure [42]. It is imperative for the health care team to look out for these uncommon presentations for prompt intervention where necessary.

Typically, elapidaes express neurotoxic venoms. However, these ophidia never cease to evolve surprises as it have been showed that the venom of the black-necked spitting cobra, Naja nigricollis demonstrated cardiotoxic effects [43,44]. In another twist, the following African spitting cobras, Naja mossambica, N. nigricincta, N. nigricollis, N. pallid, N. ashei, N. katiensis, and N. nubiae demonstrated potent anticoagulant activity in their venom arising from strong inhibition of Factor Xa [45,46]. Unfortunately, it was realized that the anticoagulatory activity of these elapids is not particularly neutralized by current antivenoms and this may pose problems in managing envenomation [45]. Additional work by others have revealed that the venoms of Naja nigricollis and Naja ashei, both African spitting cobras demonstrated cytotoxic activity as well [47, 48]. Thus, the care team must be thorough in their history, examination and investigations as well as reconciling the epidemiology and clinical presentations in patients to arrive at the most likely cause of the envenomation and hence appropriate management with some sense of the complications to expect.

Some of these atypical presentations of selected elapids mimic venom activities of ophidians in the family Viperidae. This family is principally made up of vipers of varying species and the West African carpet viper (Echis ocellatus) is reported to cause more deaths than any other snake in sub-Saharan Africa [22,49]. Envenomation from viper bites may result in local and systemic reactions including local pain, swelling/oedema, bruising, blistering, necrosis, haemorrhage, coagulopathy and nephrotoxicity as well as cardiovascular disturbances like hypotension as a sequelae. Cardiotoxicity is a rare complication but does occur [50,51].

Agarwal, A., et al. [19] reported “sinus node dysfunction” complicating a viper bite. This cardiotoxic manifestation of the venom showed sinus arrest and junctional escape rhythm on the ECG. This cardiotoxic manifestation of viper venom was corroborated by Chara, et al [52] in a case of acute myocardial infarction and/or ischaemia and myocarditis in a patient following a viper bite. A plethora of events including acute heart failure with acute pulmonary oedema, a state of cardiogenic shock, accompanied by multi-organ failure, intravascular disseminated coagulation and neurological damage were recognised. It is thus imperative for clinicians to include in their search for causes of abnormal cardiac events in patients, envenomation from viper bites.

Typically, vipers also express venoms with haemorrhagic manifestations in humans. Clinical expressions may be mediated through coagulopathic toxins (procoagulant, anticoagulant), nephrotoxins and necrotoxins [19, 32, 5355]. Expressed venoms with haemorrhagic effects may present with local and/or systemic symptoms and signs.

Local presentations may include but not limited to the following: local pain, swelling/oedema, bruising, blistering, local necrosis, tissue destruction, local bleeding and subcutaneous bleed [18, 22,44, 5557].

Usually, the systemic manifestations of expressed venoms with haemorrhagic effects result from their coagulopathic and haemorrhagic properties. Systemic presentations are very varied, affecting nearly every organ and organ system of the body. The following have been catalogued as some of the systemic manifestations of venoms with haemorrhagic effects: Bilateral pulmonary embolism, venom induced consumption coagulopathy (VICC) with intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) [22,58], brainstem ischemic stroke [57], acute kidney injury (AKI) and anuric renal failure [55,59], encephalopathy [59], internal bleeding [22], thoracic pain, respiratory failure, systemic bleeding syndrome, haemorrhagic shock, and cardiovascular collapse [22,5961]. Meanwhile, Cao and colleagues also reported intestinal necrosis following a North American pit viper bite while haematemesis and hypovolaemic shock has also been documented [21]. There is also the rather curious twist of bilateral hyphema and angle closure attack that has been reported [62].

Typically, venom from the snake family Viperidae are known for their coagulopathic and haemorrhagic properties at the neglect of other potentially harmful sequelae of viper bites. Youngman, et al [63,64] demonstrated strong neurotoxic effects with the venom of the Bitis genus of snakes including B. atropos, B. caudalis, B. arietans, B. armata, B. cornuta, B. peringueyi and B. rubida. This effect was largely mediated through phospholipase A2 (PLA2). Myotoxicity was also evident in some Bitis species.

This list of local and systemic features of venoms with haemorrhagic manifestations is not exhaustive and clinicians may very well acquaint themselves with the multi-organ effects of these venoms for prompt recognition of envenomation and appropriate management. Clinicians must also display a high sense of alertness for atypical presentations.

Snakes expressing venoms with cytotoxic and broad-range toxicity quite well overlap with ophidias expressing venoms with haemorrhagic manifestations but for Rhinoceros viper and the Variable Burrowing Asp (Atractaspis irregularis). The later doubles as a cardiotoxin venom expressing snake. In effect, the local and systemic clinical features of envenomation are quite similar to those earlier described in the aforementioned categories. The Rhinoceros viper and the Variable Burrowing Asp (Atractaspis irregularis) express their clinical features through species specific toxins including cytotoxins and cardiotoxins, necrotoxins and sarafotoxins respectively. The venom of the Rhinoceros viper is rather ferocious causing rapid and conspicuous swelling), intense pain, local blistering, bruising, and necrosis that may be extensive. Some documented systemic features include the following: swelling of the tongue and eyelids, defecation, urination, uncoordinated movements, heart damage, sudden hypotension, severe shock) with rapid deterioration of consciousness. Dyspnoea may occur. There has been reports of coagulopathies with internal bleeding, haematuria and haematemesis [1,23].

There is insufficient evidence associating sub-Saharan Africa and Ghanaian snake venoms with myotoxic venoms. However, this should be applied with circumspection as the changing climate may cause a range shift in some of the species. Global warming, globalisation and the flourishing snake pet markets make the threat of non-native snakes in West Africa and Ghana even more compelling. Clinicians must therefore have an idea of the clinical manifestations of myotoxic snake venoms including features of rhabdomyolysis and muscle necrosis [18,20]

Our study identified the clinical features of envenomation, snake type and venom expressed. This will help the attending clinician in making decisions on treatment of SBE. However, this manuscript discussed only those snake antivenoms that are available on the market and some pearls in their use. The full complement of treating snake bites is beyond the scope of this paper. In considering the use of snake antivenom, choice should be based on clinical presentation and evolution of symptoms rather than on snake identification alone [22]. Clinicians should also be mindful of reports speaking to the limited activity of antivenoms on local effects of the toxins in contrast to their neutralising effects on systemic manifestations [65,66].

It is worthy to note that most of the available snake antivenoms identified in this review are polyvalent in nature and are marketed to be active agents of a variety of snake species. Indeed, the Inoserp Pan-Africa anti-venom is marketed to be effective against envenomation of 14 different snake species. These polyvalent antivenom very well suit the African region which has a variety of snake species causing envenomation in different agro-ecological zones. Bearing in mind the economic challenges in ensuring adequate stocking of pharmaceuticals in these regions, such polyvalent antivenoms provide one-stop options for managing several envenomation in contrast to having to stock specific antivenom for each species of medically important snakes found in the agroecological zones. That challenge however, will be ensuring that these snake antivenom meet the required quality standards especially for liquid formulated antisera which requires strict maintenance of the cold-chain throughout storage period; a situation that can be challenging in limited resource settings. It would therefore require effective post marketing surveillance to provide the needed quality assurance while also ensuring that the cold-chain is maintained throughout the shelf life of these liquid snake antivenom. Furthermore, regular updates on routine quality assessment of these antisera should be made public by regulatory agencies.

In Ghana 3 polyvalent antivenoms were cited according to records of the Food and Drug Authority of Ghana of which the Snake Venom Antiserum (Pan African) (PANAF-Premium) has the broadest coverage of antivenom activity spanning 14 different species in the Viperidae and Elapidae families. The fact that these antivenoms are lyophilized powders for reconstitution inures to the benefit of the snakebite envenomation in the region by ensuring availability because of difficulties in maintaining the cold-chain liquid antivenom formulations require to remain efficacious. Also of important note is the fact that there are no antivenom manufacturers in Ghana and this poses the risk of unavailability of supply in the event of global logistic challenges as was seen with the recent COVID-19 pandemic and halting of production of antivenoms by some manufacturers. An assured supply especially to the hotspots will certainly optimise management of SBE in the country.

5 Conclusion

There is usually insufficient documentation of snake bite in health records in Ghana. This certainly impacts on the management of snake bite envenoming (SBE). Thus, an understanding of the maze of expressed venoms including cardiotoxic, neurotoxic, myotoxic, nephrotoxic, and haemotoxic and their clinical manifestation as well as the epidemiology of medically important snake species in the country will in no doubt improve diagnoses, early and appropriate treatment of SBE. Careful interpretation of clinical symptoms and signs including atypical presentations will afford better care of patients with SBE. This is demonstrated in Fig 4.

Fig 4. SBE Algorithm † Gradually increasing selected species identified to manifest myotoxic features.

Fig 4

A patient presenting in a health facility typically shows clinical features mimicking one of several groups of SBE. The manifestation may be mixed, quite often for local signs but will certainly display selected clinical features consistent with a particular type of expressed venom. This together with or without a description of the offending snake as well as the agro-ecological zone that the incident occurred may give of the likely snake type and expressed venom. This will provide the type of management to pursue including observation for non-venomous bites, treatment of local signs that are usually not very responsive to systemic anti-venom and the administration of appropriate anti-snake sera for systemic manifestation of envenoming. This study provides a useful guide in the management of SBE and thus reducing morbidity, disability and mortality due to snake bites in the country and the West African sub-region.

Meanwhile, the continuing availability of antivenom, which is the principal treatment for SBE remains questionable in Ghana and the sub-region. South Africa remains the only country on the African continent actively producing snake bite antivenom. It will be important to build the capacity of African pharmaceutical companies to be able to produce these antivenoms in order to safeguard the supply as a long-term strategy of dealing with the neglected snake bite envenomation.

6 Limitations of study

Data from the District Health Information Management System (DHIMS) of the Ghana Health Service (GHS), which was used in this study exists as summarised information thus lack specific characteristics of snakes and snake bites in Ghana. Furthermore, in applying the conclusions from this current study circumspection must be exercised in view of the impact of climate change on snake distribution and atypical presentations of some snake venoms.

7 Recommendations

This work revealed interesting characteristics of snake venoms. It also exposed some gaps that need further studies for in-depth understanding especially among native snakes in Ghana and the West African sub-region. Among these are studies into the atypical presentations of Elapidae and Viperidae including further characterisation of their venoms. The nephrotoxic activity of selected species of Viperidae native to Ghana and the sub-region also need some further studies to enhance clinical care of patients presenting to health facilities with renal manifestations following snake bite. Snakes with expressed venoms demonstrating myotoxic activities are on record to be largely non-native to Ghana and the sub-region. Some literatures have however, shown venom from selected Bitis species to exhibit myotoxic activity and this needs further studies. Subsequent manuscripts should address some of these gaps.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Mrs. Mary Ayiah-Adjei and many colleagues for their time during literature search and data collection and also for providing feedback on earlier drafts. We appreciate the support from the Ghana Health Service (GHS) in providing advise and permitting us to use information on their database for this study.

Data Availability

The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.WHO. Snake antivenoms database [Internet]. 2022. Available from: https://apps.who.int/bloodproducts/snakeantivenoms/database/default.htm). [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mabey D, Gill G, Whitty CJM, Parry E, Weber MW. Principles of medicine in Africa. Cambridge University Press; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bawaskar HS, Bawaskar PH, Bawaskar PH. The global burden of snake bite envenoming. Vol. 51, Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh. S AGE Publications Sage UK: London, England; 2021. p. 7–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chippaux J-P. Snakebite in Africa: current situation and urgent needs. Handb venoms toxins Reptil. 2021;593–612. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Yakubu A-S, Abdul-Mumin A, Adam A. Clinical and demographic profile of patients with snakebite in a tertiary hospital in Ghana. Sahel Med J. 2019;22(4):194. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chippaux J-P. Estimate of the burden of snakebites in sub-Saharan Africa: a meta-analytic approach. Toxicon. 2011;57(4):586–99. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2010.12.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Warrell DA. Clinical toxicology of snakebite in Africa and the Middle East/Arabian Peninsula. In: Handbook of: Clinical Toxicology of Animal Venoms and Poisons. CRC Press; 2017. p. 433–92. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Musah Y, Ameade EPK, Attuquayefio DK, Holbech LH. Epidemiology, ecology and human perceptions of snakebites in a savanna community of northern Ghana. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13(8):e0007221. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007221 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Habib AG, Brown NI. The snakebite problem and antivenom crisis from a health-economic perspective. Toxicon. 2018;150:115–23. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2018.05.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ainsworth S, Menzies SK, Casewell NR, Harrison RA. An analysis of preclinical efficacy testing of antivenoms for sub-Saharan Africa: Inadequate independent scrutiny and poor-quality reporting are barriers to improving snakebite treatment and management. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020;14(8):e0008579. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008579 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Punguyire D, Baiden F, Nyuzaghl J, Hultgren A, Berko Y, Brenner S, et al. Presentation, management, and outcome of snake-bite in two district hospitals in Ghana. Pan Afr Med J. 2014;19(219). [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ghana Statistical Service. 2021 Population and Housing Census Report. 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sasu DD. International poverty rate in Ghana 2017–2022 [Internet]. [cited 2022 Jul 20]. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1222084/international-poverty-rate-in-ghana/#:~:text=The international poverty rate in,was measured at 11.1 percent. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Dogbey F, Asilevi PJ, Dzrobi JF, Koffi HA, Klutse NAB. Modelling Cloud Cover Climatology over Tropical Climates in Ghana. Atmosphere (Basel). 2022;13(8):1265. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Still KBM, Slagboom J, Kidwai S, Xie C, Zhao Y, Eisses B, et al. Development of high-throughput screening assays for profiling snake venom phospholipase A2 activity after chromatographic fractionation. Toxicon. 2020;184:28–38. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2020.05.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Benjamin JM, Brandehoff NRPN Wilson CPTB, Hall MAJA, Greene S, Maddry MAJJ, et al. Global Snake Envenomation Management (CPG ID: 81). 2020; [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Delafontaine M, Panfil C, Spöler F, Kray S, Burgher F, Mathieu L, et al. The Ex vivo Eye Irritation Test (EVEIT) model as a mean of improving venom ophthalmia understanding. Toxicon. 2018;150:253–60. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2018.06.061 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bertheau S, Aghdassi A, Otto M, Hegenscheid K, Runge S, Lerch MM, et al. Snake bite in a 53-year-old female tourist. Internist (Berl). 2015;56(2):189–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Agarwal A, Kumar T, Ravindranath KS, Bhat P, Manjunath CN, Agarwal N. Sinus node dysfunction complicating viper bite. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2015;23(2):212–4. doi: 10.1177/0218492313501819 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Borges RJ, Lemke N, Fontes MRM. PLA2-like proteins myotoxic mechanism: a dynamic model description. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wagener M. Haemotoxic snakebite in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: A case presenting with haematemesis. SAMJ South African Med J. 2016;106(5):459–60. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2016.v106i5.9124 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Benjamin JM, Chippaux J-P, Jackson K, Ashe S, Tamou-Sambo B, Massougbodji A, et al. Differential diagnosis of an unusual snakebite presentation in Benin: dry bite or envenomation? J Spec Oper Med a Peer Rev J SOF Med Prof. 2019;19(2):18–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.WCH. WCH Clinical Toxinology Resources [Internet]. Clinical Toxinology Resources. 2022. Available from: http://www.toxinology.com/fusebox.cfm?fuseaction=main.snakes.display&id=SN0182], [Google Scholar]
  • 24.WHO Snakebite Information and Data Platform [Internet]. Available from https://www.who.int/teams/control-of-neglected-tropical-diseases/snakebite-envenoming/snakebite-information-and-data-platform.
  • 25.Said M., Valdespino E., Baba S. P., Lako R., Malm A., Gonzalez A., & Alcoba G. (2020). Perspectives from MSF snakebite programme implementation in Agok, Abyei region, South Sudan. South Sudan Medical Journal, 13(4), 146–152. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Food and Drug Authority of Ghana, Registered Products Registry (2022) http://fdaghana.gov.gh/registered-products.php [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Potet J., Beran D., Ray N., Alcoba G., Habib A. G., Iliyasu G.,… & Williams D. J. (2021). Access to antivenoms in the developing world: a multidisciplinary analysis. Toxicon: X, 12, 100086. doi: 10.1016/j.toxcx.2021.100086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Dalhat M. M., Potet J., Mohammed A., Chotun N., Tesfahunei H. A., & Habib A. G. (2023). Availability, accessibility and use of antivenom for snakebite envenomation in Africa with proposed strategies to overcome the limitations. Toxicon: X, 18, 100152. doi: 10.1016/j.toxcx.2023.100152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Fry BG. Snakebite: When the human touch becomes a bad touch. Toxins (Basel). 2018;10(4):170. doi: 10.3390/toxins10040170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.de Castañeda RR, Bolon I, Gutiérrez JM. A transdisciplinary approach to snakebite envenoming. Toxicon X. 2022;13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Elbey B, Baykal B, Yazgan ÜC, Zengin Y. The prognostic value of the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio in patients with snake bites for clinical outcomes and complications. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2017;24(2):362–6. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2015.10.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lewinska A, Bocian A, Petrilla V, Adamczyk-Grochala J, Szymura K, Hendzel W, et al. Snake venoms promote stress-induced senescence in human fibroblasts. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234(5):6147–60. doi: 10.1002/jcp.27382 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Taylor EN, Diele-Viegas LM, Gangloff EJ, Hall JM, Halpern B, Massey MD, et al. The thermal ecology and physiology of reptiles and amphibians: A user’s guide. J Exp Zool Part A Ecol Integr Physiol. 2021;335(1):13–44. doi: 10.1002/jez.2396 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.May PG, Farrell TM, Heulett ST, Pilgrim MA, Bishop LA, Spence DJ, et al. Seasonal abundance and activity of a rattlesnake (Sistrurus miliarius barbouri) in central Florida. Copeia. 1996;389–401. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bucaretchi F, Borrasca-Fernandes CF, De Capitani EM, Hyslop S. Consecutive envenomation of two men bitten by the same coral snake (Micrurus corallinus). Clin Toxicol. 2020;58(2):132–5. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2019.1610568 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bucaretchi F, De Capitani EM, Vieira RJ, Rodrigues CK, Zannin M, Da Silva NJ Jr, et al. Coral snake bites (Micrurus spp.) in Brazil: a review of literature reports. Clin Toxicol. 2016;54(3):222–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Cañas CA, Castro-Herrera F, Castaño-Valencia S. Envenomation by the red-tailed coral snake (Micrurus mipartitus) in Colombia. J Venom Anim Toxins Incl Trop Dis. 2017;23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Corbett B, Clark RF. North American snake envenomation. Emerg Med Clin. 2017;35(2):339–54. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2016.12.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Dalugama C, Gawarammana IB. Confirmed Ceylon krait (Bungarus ceylonicus) envenoming in Sri Lanka resulting in neuromuscular paralysis: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2017;11(1):1–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Faiz MA, Ahsan MF, Ghose A, Rahman MR, Amin R, Hossain M, et al. Bites by the monocled cobra, Naja kaouthia, in chittagong division, bangladesh: Epidemiology, clinical features of envenoming and management of 70 identified cases. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017;96(4):876. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0842 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Fuchs J, Weiler S, Meier J. Envenomation by a western green mamba (Dendroaspis viridis)–A report of three episodes in Switzerland. Toxicon. 2019;168:76–82. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2019.06.223 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Anadure RK, Narayanan CS, Hande V, Singhal A, Varadaraj G. Two cases of early morning neuroparalytic syndrome (EMNS) in the tropics-masquerading as brain death. J Assoc Physicians India. 2018;66(1):92–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Abdou F, Denshary EE, Shaaban E, Mohamed M. Assessment of the neutralizing potency of antisera raised against native and γ-irradiated Naja nigricollis (black-necked spitting cobra) venom in rabbits, concerning its cardiotoxic effect. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2017;36(12):1335–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Jega AY, Abdullahi MI, Musa AM, Kaita HA, Mzozoyana V, Emmanuel AA. Biochemical evaluation and molecular docking assessment of glucosamines from Neocarya macrophylla fruits against Naja nigricollis venom. Carbohydr Res. 2021;509:108436. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2021.108436 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Chowdhury A, Lewin MR, Zdenek CN, Carter R, Fry BG. The relative efficacy of chemically diverse small-molecule enzyme-inhibitors against anticoagulant activities of african spitting cobra (Naja species) venoms. Front Immunol. 2021;4215. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.752442 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kazandjian TD, Arrahman A, Still K, Somsen GW, Vonk FJ, Casewell NR, et al. Anticoagulant activity of Naja nigricollis venom is mediated by phospholipase A2 toxins and inhibited by varespladib. Toxins (Basel). 2021;13(5):302. doi: 10.3390/toxins13050302 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Conlon JM, Attoub S, Musale V, Leprince J, Casewell NR, Sanz L, et al. Isolation and characterization of cytotoxic and insulin-releasing components from the venom of the black-necked spitting cobra Naja nigricollis (Elapidae). Toxicon X. 2020;6:100030. doi: 10.1016/j.toxcx.2020.100030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Hus KK, Buczkowicz J, Petrilla V, Petrillová M, Łyskowski A, Legáth J, et al. First look at the venom of Naja ashei. Molecules. 2018;23(3):609. doi: 10.3390/molecules23030609 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Dingwoke EJ, Adamude FA, Mohamed G, Klein A, Salihu A, Abubakar MS, et al. Venom proteomic analysis of medically important Nigerian viper Echis ocellatus and Bitis arietans snake species. Biochem Biophys Reports. 2021;28:101164. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2021.101164 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Megale ÂAA, Magnoli FC, Kuniyoshi AK, Iwai LK, Tambourgi D V, Portaro FC V, et al. Kn-Ba: a novel serine protease isolated from Bitis arietans snake venom with fibrinogenolytic and kinin-releasing activities. J Venom Anim Toxins Incl Trop Dis. 2019;24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Neumann C, Slagboom J, Somsen GW, Vonk F, Casewell NR, Cardoso CL, et al. Development of a generic high-throughput screening assay for profiling snake venom protease activity after high-resolution chromatographic fractionation. Toxicon. 2020;178:61–8. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2020.02.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Chara K, Baccouche N, Turki O, Regaig K, Chaari A, Bahloul M, et al. A rare complication of viper envenomation: cardiac failure. A case report. Med Sante Trop. 2017;27(1):52–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Debono J, Dashevsky D, Nouwens A, Fry BG. The sweet side of venom: Glycosylated prothrombin activating metalloproteases from Dispholidus typus (boomslang) and Thelotornis mossambicanus (twig snake). Comp Biochem Physiol Part C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2020;227:108625. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpc.2019.108625 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Debono J, Dobson J, Casewell NR, Romilio A, Li B, Kurniawan N, et al. Coagulating colubrids: Evolutionary, pathophysiological and biodiscovery implications of venom variations between boomslang (Dispholidus typus) and twig snake (Thelotornis mossambicanus). Toxins (Basel). 2017;9(5):171. doi: 10.3390/toxins9050171 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Alves EC, Sachett J de AG, Sampaio VS, Sousa JD de B, Oliveira SS de, Nascimento EF do, et al. Predicting acute renal failure in Bothrops snakebite patients in a tertiary reference center, Western Brazilian Amazon. PLoS One. 2018;13(8):e0202361. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202361 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Brvar M, Kurtović T, Grenc D, Lang Balija M, Križaj I, Halassy B. Vipera ammodytes bites treated with antivenom ViperaTAb: a case series with pharmacokinetic evaluation. Clin Toxicol. 2017;55(4):241–8. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2016.1277235 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Cañas CA, Vallejo A. Envenomation by Bothrops punctatus in southwestern Colombia. Toxicon. 2016;124:94–6. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2016.11.246 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Berling I, Brown SGA, Miteff F, Levi C, Isbister GK. Intracranial haemorrhages associated with venom induced consumption coagulopathy in Australian snakebites (ASP-21). Toxicon. 2015;102:8–13. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2015.05.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Cao D, Domanski K, Hodgman E, Cardenas C, Weinreich M, Hutto J, et al. Thromboelastometry analysis of severe North American pit viper-induced coagulopathy: A case report. Toxicon. 2018;151:29–33. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2018.06.079 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Baum RA, Bronner J, Akpunonu PDS, Plott J, Bailey AM, Keyler DE. Crotalus durissus terrificus (viperidae; crotalinae) envenomation: Respiratory failure and treatment with antivipmyn TRI antivenom. Toxicon. 2019;163:32–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Bart G, Pineau S, Biron C, Connault J, Artifoni M. Bilateral pulmonary embolism following a viper envenomation in France: a case report and review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(19). doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002798 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Aye MTH, Naing T, Myint KT. Unusual ocular manifestations following viper bite. Case Reports. 2018;2018:bcr–2018. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2018-225040 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Youngman NJ, Harris RJ, Huynh TM, Coster K, Sundman E, Braun R, et al. Widespread and differential neurotoxicity in venoms from the Bitis genus of viperid snakes. Neurotox Res. 2021;39(3):697–704. doi: 10.1007/s12640-021-00330-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Youngman NJ, Debono J, Dobson JS, Zdenek CN, Harris RJ, op den Brouw B, et al. Venomous landmines: Clinical implications of extreme coagulotoxic diversification and differential neutralization by antivenom of venoms within the Viperid snake genus Bitis. Toxins (Basel). 2019;11(7):422. doi: 10.3390/toxins11070422 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.da Silva ACR, Ferreira LG, Duarte MER, Fujii MT, Sanchez EF, Noseda MD, et al. Protective effect of the sulfated agaran isolated from the red seaweed Laurencia aldingensis against toxic effects of the venom of the snake, Lachesis muta. Mar Biotechnol. 2016;18(6):619–29. doi: 10.1007/s10126-016-9722-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Silva GA da Domingos TFS, Fonseca RR Sanchez EF, Teixeira VL Fuly AL. The red seaweed Plocamium brasiliense shows anti-snake venom toxic effects. J Venom Anim Toxins Incl Trop Dis. 2015;21:1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011050.r001

Decision Letter 0

Wuelton M Monteiro

27 Jan 2023

Dear Gyakobo,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Compendium of medically important snakes, venom activity and clinical presentations in Ghana" for consideration at PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. In light of the reviews (below this email), we would like to invite the resubmission of a significantly-revised version that takes into account the reviewers' comments.

We cannot make any decision about publication until we have seen the revised manuscript and your response to the reviewers' comments. Your revised manuscript is also likely to be sent to reviewers for further evaluation.

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript. Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 60 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email. Please note that revised manuscripts received after the 60-day due date may require evaluation and peer review similar to newly submitted manuscripts.

Thank you again for your submission. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Wuelton M. Monteiro, Ph.D.

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Wuelton Monteiro

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Key Review Criteria Required for Acceptance?

As you describe the new analyses required for acceptance, please consider the following:

Methods

-Are the objectives of the study clearly articulated with a clear testable hypothesis stated?

-Is the study design appropriate to address the stated objectives?

-Is the population clearly described and appropriate for the hypothesis being tested?

-Is the sample size sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested?

-Were correct statistical analysis used to support conclusions?

-Are there concerns about ethical or regulatory requirements being met?

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: 1. There is need to clarify how the information from literature databases was reviewed. Was it systematically reviewed? If so, it would be advisable to follow the PRISMA guidelines.

2. It would be helpful to provide more information on the sources of the data and how it was collected. For example, it is not clear how the data from the DHIMS database was augmented or what types of medical records were reviewed

3. It would be helpful to provide more information on the sampling method used for the study, including the criteria for selecting the personnel to be interviewed, the hospitals and health facilities to be included.

4. The study would need ethical clearance from an IRB

Reviewer #3: Please see the general comments.

--------------------

Results

-Does the analysis presented match the analysis plan?

-Are the results clearly and completely presented?

-Are the figures (Tables, Images) of sufficient quality for clarity?

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: The results are presented clearly and are complete. The figures and tables are of sufficient quality for clarity. The analysis presented appears to match the analysis plan. However this may change after the review of the methodology.

Some other general comments here include

• This sentence is not clear "Whereas a cardiotoxin, sarafotoxin, with endothelin-like properties has been isolated from the Variable Burrowing Asp"

• "Bites from these species present as coagulopathy and lead to infarction and ischemia." - It might be clearer to say "Bites from these species can cause coagulopathy, infarction, and ischemia

Reviewer #3: Please see the general comments.

--------------------

Conclusions

-Are the conclusions supported by the data presented?

-Are the limitations of analysis clearly described?

-Do the authors discuss how these data can be helpful to advance our understanding of the topic under study?

-Is public health relevance addressed?

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: The conclusions is too broad and focus the main findings or implications of the study more. The authors need to be more concise and with the discussion points. The limitations of the analysis and study have not been included in this paper.

Reviewer #3: Please see the general comments.

--------------------

Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications?

Use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity. If the only modifications needed are minor and/or editorial, you may wish to recommend “Minor Revision” or “Accept”.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: The overall paper may also need minor grammar checks

Reviewer #3: The manuscript ‘Compendium of medically important snakes, venom activity and clinical presentations in Ghana’ by Justus P. Deikumah and group is fairly an elaborate study and deserves publication in PNTD. The results of this study although do not present any new findings, however, give the compilation of various parameters. This study, I believe gives better confidence in the treatment and management of deadly snakebites in Ghana. The manuscript is well written, however with some minor grammatical errors and needs thorough correction before it is accepted.

--------------------

Summary and General Comments

Use this section to provide overall comments, discuss strengths/weaknesses of the study, novelty, significance, general execution and scholarship. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. If requesting major revision, please articulate the new experiments that are needed.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Introduction

Based on the review of relevant literature and data from the District Health Information Management System (DHIMS) of the Ghana Health Service (GHS), this study aims to provide an understanding of snake bite envenoming (SBE) in Ghana and the West African sub-region, including the distribution and habits of snake species, the types of venom they express, and their clinical manifestations. The study found that SBE in Ghana is largely grouped by the activity of the expressed venom, which can be neurotoxic, cardiotoxic, haemorrhagic, cytotoxic, myotoxic, nephrotoxic, or procoagulant. Neurotoxic venom is primarily expressed by elapid snakes, while viperidae snakes predominantly express venoms with cardiotoxic, haemorrhagic, nephrotoxic, and procoagulant activities. Venom expressing myotoxic activity is largely absent in the region, while venoms expressing cytotoxic activity are expressed by a variety of snake species, particularly viperidae. Snakes expressing neurotoxic and haemorrhagic venoms are prevalent across all agro-ecological zones in Ghana. The availability of antivenoms for SBE in the region is limited, with South Africa being the only African country actively producing antivenoms. Understanding the characteristics of snakes and their venoms in the region will be useful for the management of SBE and improving patient outcomes.

Strengths and weaknesses of the paper

Based on the information provided, it appears that the manuscript is a review of snake bite envenoming in Ghana, including information on snake distribution, venom expression, and clinical manifestations. The study used a desk review of published literature and data from the District Health Information Management System to gather information.

One strength of the manuscript is the inclusion of data from multiple sources, including published literature and a government health database. The review is also specific to the context of Ghana, which is useful for understanding the local epidemiology of snake bite envenoming.

One potential weakness of the manuscript is that it is based on a desk review rather than original research. It is also not clear whether the sample size for the data from the District Health Information Management System is sufficient to accurately represent the incidence of snake bite envenoming in Ghana. The methodology is generally not very clear.

Overall, the manuscript appears to provide useful information on snake bite envenoming in Ghana and could be valuable for clinicians and researchers working in the region. However, further original research may be necessary to fully understand the epidemiology of snake bite envenoming in Ghana.

Additional comments for the authors

Here are other specific issues

Introduction section:

• The study objectives is not clearly stated in the introduction. The lines 114 to 116 should be clearer and connect with materiel in the previous paragraph.

In the methods section:

• The criteria for selecting hospitals and regional medical stores is not described.

• The interviews with the experts will also need a standardised questionnaire.

• In the paragraph describing the data management process, it is not clear what is meant by "the matrix." It might be helpful to provide more context or explanation for this.

• It would be helpful to provide more information on the sources of the data and how it was collected. For example, it is not clear how the data from the DHIMS database was augmented or what types of medical records were reviewed.

• It would be helpful to provide more information on the sampling method used for the study, including the criteria for selecting the personnel to be interviewed, the hospitals and health facilities to be included.

• The interview with the experts will also need ethical clearance form an institutional review board.

• It might be helpful to provide more information on the study's limitations and any potential sources of bias or confounding factors ( overall limitations of the study and details can also be written after the discussion).

In the results section:

• It would be important to know what aspects the experts interviewed contributed to the results.

In the discussion section:

• The link between climate change and human-snake encounters is not well-established and seems like it has been misplaced here. It would be appropriate if the first paragraph focuses on the study findings.

• Generally, the discussion could be more concise and focused on the main findings and implications of the study.

• There is some instances of repetition of information from the results section which can be trimmed to make the discussion more focused.

• It will also be important to highlight what aspects where provided by experts and how they fit in the discussion.

• A section focusing on the limitations of the research, methodology should be written

In the conclusion section:

• The conclusion is too broad and does not clearly summarize the main findings or implications of the study.

• A separate section focusing on recommendations can be written

• The recommendation for building capacity for African pharmaceutical companies to produce antivenoms is not well-supported or explained.

for the major revisions;

1. for the literature search - design a correct systematic review and report using PRISMA guidelines

2. for the expert survey - inclusion and exclusion criteria, sample size determination, standardised questionnaire

Reviewer #3: The manuscript ‘Compendium of medically important snakes, venom activity and clinical presentations in Ghana’ by Justus P. Deikumah and group is fairly an elaborate study and deserves publication in PNTD. The results of this study although do not present any new findings, however, give the compilation of various parameters. This study, I believe gives better confidence in the treatment and management of deadly snakebites in Ghana. The manuscript is well written, however with some minor grammatical errors and needs thorough correction before it is accepted.

Minor comments

Line 154: 2.2. Methods, it is a repetition of line 124 (2. Methods)

Line 212; 3.2.1. Snakes species and neurotoxin in humans

This is misleading, change as neurotoxic symptoms in human

238 3.2.2. Snake species and Cardiotoxins in humans.

Change as cardiotoxicity or cardiotoxic effect in human

Table 3.2.1: Snakes species and neurotoxin (Postsynaptic) effects in humans

Change as neurotoxic

238 3.2.2. Snake species and Cardiotoxins in humans

Change as cardiotoxic effect

251 Table 3.2.2: Snakes species and Cardiotoxin effects in humans

Change as cardiotoxic

256 3.2.3. Snake species and haemorrhagins (or haematotoxins) in humans

Change as hemorrhagic effect

272 3.2.4. Snake species and procoagulants in humans

Change as procoagulant effect

289 3.2.5. Snake species and cytotoxic and broad-spectrum toxins in humans

Change as cytotoxic effect and broad-spectrum toxicity.

Discussion

Line 349, Snakes that express neurotoxins are the most prevalent across Ghana though

Change this as neurotoxic venom.

Similarly change other properties all throughout the text.

Viz. cardiotoxicity or cardiotoxic effect (do not present as cardiotoxin or myotoxin or neurotoxin)

Lines 91 and 92 : Compounding these challenges is the proliferation of poor quality antivenoms available in these areas.

The current discussion justifying the above statement is inadequate, therefore throw little more light on this statement in the discussion.

Important issue: the authors have given elaborate details on snakebite incidence and hot spots, clinical characteristics of snake venoms, the distribution pattern of medically important snakes of Ghana, snake species that induce various toxic properties such as neurotoxicity, myotoxicity, etc., available anti-venoms/anti-serum, however, the manuscript is seriously lacking about the information on mortality and morbidity details. Having acquired detailed data on the above-mentioned parameters, I believe, adding the mortality and morbidity details would elevate the quality of the manuscript. I suggest the authors, if possible, seriously consider the inclusion of the suggestion.

--------------------

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Pedro Ferreira Bisneto

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: Yes: Dr. K.Kemparaju

Professor

Department of Studies in Biochemistry

University of Mysore

Mysuru 570 006, India.

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

Attachment

Submitted filename: Reviewer comments PNTD-D-22-01600.docx

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011050.r003

Decision Letter 1

Wuelton M Monteiro

23 Jun 2023

Dear Gyakobo,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Compendium of medically important snakes, venom activity and clinical presentations in Ghana' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Wuelton M. Monteiro, Ph.D.

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Wuelton Monteiro

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************************************************

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Key Review Criteria Required for Acceptance?

As you describe the new analyses required for acceptance, please consider the following:

Methods

-Are the objectives of the study clearly articulated with a clear testable hypothesis stated?

-Is the study design appropriate to address the stated objectives?

-Is the population clearly described and appropriate for the hypothesis being tested?

-Is the sample size sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested?

-Were correct statistical analysis used to support conclusions?

-Are there concerns about ethical or regulatory requirements being met?

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: comments in the general section

**********

Results

-Does the analysis presented match the analysis plan?

-Are the results clearly and completely presented?

-Are the figures (Tables, Images) of sufficient quality for clarity?

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: comments in the general section

**********

Conclusions

-Are the conclusions supported by the data presented?

-Are the limitations of analysis clearly described?

-Do the authors discuss how these data can be helpful to advance our understanding of the topic under study?

-Is public health relevance addressed?

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: comments in the general section

**********

Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications?

Use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity. If the only modifications needed are minor and/or editorial, you may wish to recommend “Minor Revision” or “Accept”.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

Summary and General Comments

Use this section to provide overall comments, discuss strengths/weaknesses of the study, novelty, significance, general execution and scholarship. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. If requesting major revision, please articulate the new experiments that are needed.

Reviewer #1: After reading the manuscript again, I can see that the authors improved it and adressed my suggestions. Therefore I can recommend its publication.

Reviewer #2: The authors have significantly improved the manuscript in line with the suggestions provided during the initial review phase. Their revisions have provided greater clarity to the content, enhancing the overall readability and scientific accuracy of the paper.

The previous concerns raised about the several aspects of the study have all been successfully addressed. The authors have expanded on key areas such as limitations and recommendations. This revised version of the manuscript provides a valuable and timely addition to the existing body of literature in snakebite envenomation , particularly for its relevance to the specific context of Ghana. The data presented here can serve as a robust reference for clinicians, researchers, and conservationists.

The tables and figures are well-structured and present essential information effectively. The manuscript is now more logically organized, and the argumentation flows well. Regarding language and grammar, it is apparent that the authors have put forth effort to enhance the text's clarity and precision. The manuscript is well-written, enabling readers from a variety of backgrounds to understand the implications of the study.

Overall, the authors have addressed the previously raised issues efficiently and effectively, substantially improving the quality and impact of their work. I am satisfied with the revisions and recommend that this paper be accepted for publication.

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Pedro Ferreira Bisneto

Reviewer #2: No

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011050.r004

Acceptance letter

Wuelton M Monteiro

25 Jul 2023

Dear Gyakobo,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "Compendium of medically important snakes, venom activity and clinical presentations in Ghana," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Editorial, Viewpoint, Symposium, Review, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript will be published online unless you opted out of this process. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Shaden Kamhawi

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Paul Brindley

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Reviewer comments PNTD-D-22-01600.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.doc

    Data Availability Statement

    The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES