Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2023 Aug 9;18(8):e0289756. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289756

Prevalence, clinical presentation and factors associated with chronic lung disease among children and adolescents living with HIV in Kenya

Elizabeth Maleche-Obimbo 1,2,*, Engi Attia 3,4, Fredrick Were 1, Walter Jaoko 5, Stephen M Graham 6
Editor: Judith Kose7
PMCID: PMC10411792  PMID: 37556423

Abstract

Introduction

Children and adolescents with HIV (CAHIV) may experience recurrent and severe respiratory disease and are at risk of residual lung sequelae, and long-term morbidity from chronically damaged lungs. With improved survival due to increased access to effective antiretroviral therapy there is an increasing population of CAHIV who require optimal life-long care. Chronic lung disease in CAHIV is an under-recognised problem in African settings. We sought to determine the prevalence, clinical presentation and factors associated with chronic lung disease (CLD) among CAHIV in Kenya.

Methods

CAHIV aged ≤19 years in care at a public hospital in Nairobi were enrolled into a longitudinal cohort study. Sociodemographic and clinical information were obtained through interview, medical record review, physical examination and six-minute walk test. CD4 counts and viral load were determined. Enrolment data was analysed to determine baseline sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Prevalence of CLD defined as presence of ≥2 respiratory symptoms or signs at enrolment was computed. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate for association between various factors and presence or absence of CLD.

Results

We enrolled 320 CAHIV of median age 13 (IQR 10–16) years, 80 (25%) were <10 years, 46% were female, 31% lived in a one-room house and 51% used polluting cooking fuel. Antiretroviral therapy (ART) was initiated after age five years in 56%, 43% had prior pneumonia or tuberculosis, 11% had low CD4 count and 79% were virologically suppressed. Common respiratory symptoms and signs were exertional breathlessness (40%), chronic cough (23%), chest problems in the preceding year (24%), tachypnoea (52%), finger clubbing (6%), exercise limitation (59%) and oxygen desaturation during exercise (7%). CLD was present in 82 (26%) participants, and adding the six-minute walk distance <70% of predicted (exercise limitation) identified an additional 28 (9%) CAHIV with CLD. CLD was more common among older teenagers (odds ratio (OR) 1.95), those who had prior TB or pneumonia (OR 2.04), delayed initiation of ART (OR 2.60), cotrimoxazole prophylaxis (OR 3.35) or TB preventive therapy (OR 2.81). CLD was associated with viraemia (OR 2.7), lower quality of life (OR 12.7), small houses (OR 2.05), caregiver having fewer years of education (OR 2.46), outdoor pollution exposure (OR 3.31) and lower use of polluting cooking fuel indoors (OR 0.26). Adjusted analysis revealed CLD to be associated with prior tuberculosis or pneumonia (adjusted OR (aOR) [95%CI] 2.15 [1.18–3.91]), small house (aOR 1.95 [1.02–3.73]), lower use of polluting cooking fuel (aOR 0.35 [0.13–0.94]) and negative impact on health-related quality of life (aOR 6.91 [3.66–13.03]).

Conclusions

CLD is highly prevalent across the age spectrum of CAHIV, and most are symptomatic with cough or exertional breathlessness. CLD is associated with prior tuberculosis or pneumonia, socio-environmental factors, and lower quality of life. Structured interventions are needed to provide optimal care specific to their needs.

Introduction

There are an estimated 1.42 million children aged under 15 years living with HIV, of whom 1.0 million live in the Eastern and Southern African regions [1]. Kenya remains among the top ten highest HIV burden countries with a current estimated 1.4 million (1.2–1.6m) people aged 15 years and above, and 83,000 (66,000–100,000) children age <15 years living with HIV [1].

Much progress has been made in resource-limited settings such as Kenya to achieve early HIV diagnosis and treatment in infants. However, there still exist gaps in the prevention of mother to child transmission cascade and new infant infections continue to occur. As immune depletion can progress rapidly in perinatally HIV-infected infants, many are still diagnosed at an advanced stage of HIV disease having already experienced recurrent severe opportunistic infections such as pneumonia or tuberculosis (TB) [25]. Once on effective antiretroviral therapy (ART), recurrent and severe infections become relatively infrequent [67] and survival greatly improves but there may be residual organ damage [2, 811, 18]. The lung is the commonest site of infection in untreated HIV disease, and therefore the organ most vulnerable to damage and long-term sequelae [2, 1214]. Recognition is relatively recent by clinicians and researchers that chronic lung disease (CLD) is common among individuals living with HIV, including children and adolescents [2, 10, 1420].

There is lack of standard paediatric diagnostic protocols and structured services specific to CLD in African healthcare settings. Given improved survival of perinatally HIV-infected children beyond early childhood in sub-Saharan Africa, there is a need for a better understanding of the burden, clinical presentation and severity of CLD in this vulnerable population. These insights may be valuable to guide the targeted clinical services necessary to optimise their health care, minimise morbidity and improve long-term health outcomes. Therefore, we aimed to describe the prevalence and clinical presentation of CLD in a cohort of children and adolescents with HIV (CAHIV) receiving care in a tertiary public hospital in Nairobi, Kenya, and to determine factors associated with CLD that might inform prevention and treatment strategies.

Methods

Study population

We conducted an observational longitudinal cohort study in CAHIV receiving care at a public tertiary referral hospital in Nairobi, Kenya. The Kenyatta National Hospital comprehensive HIV care clinic had approximately 500 children and adolescents age <20 years actively in long-term care in 2020. Participants were recruited between February 2020 and September 2021 into the Breathe Poa Study, a longitudinal cohort study on chronic respiratory disease in children and adolescents living with HIV at Kenyatta National Hospital. This paper reports baseline results of the study.

Children and adolescents were eligible for inclusion if they were HIV infected, aged 19 years or below, and actively in care at the hospital’s HIV comprehensive care clinic for at least six months. Those on current treatment for TB or who had acute severe illness on the day of screening were excluded but were eligible to join on completion of TB treatment or recovery from acute severe illness. Individuals with a known diagnosis of cardiac disease (with exception of cor pulmonale) were also excluded.

Clinical data collection

Clinic attendees at the HIV care clinic were approached during their routine HIV clinic visit, screened for eligibility, and all eligible clients were informed about the study and invited to participate. Informed written consent was obtained from older adolescents aged 18 or 19 years, and from the parent/guardian of those aged <18 years, as well as assent from those children and adolescents aged 8–17 years. A unique study identification number was assigned to each enrolled participant, and this unique study identifier was used on all study case records to protect patient confidentiality. A questionnaire was administered to obtain information on socio-demography, indoor air pollution exposure inside the home, outdoor pollution exposures close to the home or school, history of prior pneumonia or TB, prior hospitalisations due to pneumonia or TB, and current and persistent respiratory symptoms. The Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test (CAT) was administered to evaluate impact of respiratory symptoms on their health-related quality of life. Participants underwent physical examination including measurement of weight, height, resting respiratory rate (RR) and heart rate (HR), chest examination and assessment for finger clubbing. Pulse oximetry was used to determine peripheral oxygen saturations (SPO2).

Ambulatory children and adolescents who were able to follow instructions underwent a standardised six-minute walk test (6MWT) outdoors in a flat grassy field of length 30 metres and total distance covered was measured (outdoors due to covid-19 safety precautions) [21]. Respiratory rate, heart rate and SPO2 before and at end of exercise were documented. Children were asked if they felt short of breath, and how fatigued they felt during exercise. Severity of breathlessness was scored between 1 and 5 (1 = not breathless, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe or 5 = very severe) using the Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnoea score [22]. Level of exertional fatigue was assessed using Borg face score between 0 (no fatigue) and 10 (extreme fatigue). Those who were severely hypoxic at rest (SPO2 <90%) or unable to follow instructions because they were mentally or physically impaired or very young (<3 years) were not subjected to exercise testing. A venous blood sample was obtained on the day of enrolment for CD4 count and full blood count. Recent HIV viral load data were obtained from their medical record and if none had been taken within the preceding 6–12 months, a blood sample was taken for viral load assay.

Relevant prior medical data including HIV diagnosis and staging, ART history and prior medical information were abstracted from the electronic or paper hospital medical records of each patient and entered into study case records forms. In the parent study participants were followed up once, and the study follow-up visit was aligned to their routine scheduled HIV care clinic visit. At follow-up visit each enrolled participant underwent clinical evaluation for intercurrent or persistent respiratory symptoms, and exercise testing as part of the parent study.

Indoor exposure to pollutant cooking fuel smoke at home was captured. Outdoor exposure from car exhaust, smoke from combustion activities such as burning rubbish, or from construction dust near home or school was captured. Participants were asked to specify how frequently they were exposed to each pollutant, whether rarely, some days, or daily.

Clinical definitions

Body mass index (BMI) was computed for each child using weight in kilograms divided by the square of their height in metres. All anthropometric parameters (weight, height and BMI) for each child were converted to Z-scores by comparing to a reference population [23]. To analyse the 6MWT data, we computed the expected walk distance for each participant using the reference equation developed in healthy North African children by Saad et al. [24]. The actual distance walked during the 6MWT for each child or adolescent was compared to the expected distance walked by a healthy child of similar age, weight, height and sex, and percent of expected distance achieved was calculated. Exercise limitation was defined as reduced walk distance <80% of expected, and mild, moderate and severe exercise limitation defined as 70–79%, 60–69% and <60% of expected distance respectively. Resting RR and HR were categorised as high (tachypnoea and tachycardia, respectively) if they were ≥90th centile for age, and very high if it was ≥99th centile for age [25]. Hypoxia at rest was defined as SPO2 of ≤92% when breathing air, and desaturation during exercise as a decline in SPO2 of 3% or more during the exercise test. Level of breathlessness experienced while walking was classified using the MRC dyspnoea score, and level of exertional fatigue experienced was captured using the Borg face score. The prevalence of each specific respiratory symptom and sign suggestive of CLD was computed.

CLD was defined as presence of ≥2 of the following five clinical features: persistent cough, moderate to severe exertional breathlessness (MRC score >2), very high RR at rest (≥ 99th centile for age), finger clubbing, resting SPO2 ≤92% or decline by 3% or more with exercise. Analysis of each child’s data was done to identify those with two or more suggestive clinical symptoms/signs compatible with the diagnosis of CLD, and the prevalence of CLD in the study population using this composite definition was determined (basic definition of CLD). We also explored the effect of adding a sixth criteria of moderate to severe exercise limitation to enhance the identification of participants with CLD (enhanced definition of CLD).

Sample size, data management and statistical analysis

Epi-Info version 7 Statcalc software was used employing the Fleiss formula with correction to estimate required sample size for cohort studies, assuming 80% power and α (two-sided) of 0.05 [26]. An additional 10% was added to cater for possibility of incomplete data or loss to follow-up giving a desired sample size of 320 study subjects. All identified eligible participants attending clinic every weekday who consented to participate were consecutively enrolled until the desired sample size was achieved. Data were collected on paper case record forms and entered into a secure database using Microsoft Access 2016 software. A link log of patient study identification number and patient hospital number was maintained in a password protected file with access restricted to the study clinical team to enable feedback on laboratory results to the primary clinical care team and to the study participants, and for rescheduling of missed follow-up appointments in the parent study. Data were cleaned and exported to Microsoft Excel, and analyses conducted using Stata/SE version 17.0 software (StataCorp, Texas, USA). Patient sociodemographic, environmental and clinical characteristics were analysed and reported using median and inter-quartile range (IQR), and frequencies and proportions, as appropriate. Inferential statistics were used to evaluate associations between various socio-demographic and clinical factors and the binary outcome presence or absence of CLD (5-clinical feature definition) using univariable logistic regression and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals reported. Where appropriate chi-square test for homogeneity across multiple categories, or test for linear trend were applied. Mann-Whitney test was used as appropriate to assess association between continuous variables and CLD. A multivariable logistic regression model was fitted including a-priori factors with p<0.05 at univariable analysis. Variables missing data for >10% of participants were excluded from the model to minimise bias. Adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were reported.

The protocol was approved by the University of Nairobi / Kenyatta National Hospital Ethical Review Committee (P396/05/2019) and was registered with the Research Department of Kenyatta National Teaching Hospital. Additional information regarding the ethical, cultural, and scientific considerations specific to inclusivity in global research is included in S1 Checklist.

Results

Sociodemographic and home environmental characteristics

We screened 326 children and adolescents from February 2020 to September 2021, and 320 consented to participate and were enrolled. Two were ineligible as they were from a children’s home, and four potentially eligible children declined to participate due to non-interest. Due to the covid-19 pandemic active enrolment was stopped on 18th March 2020 after enrolling the first 14 participants, and restarted eight months later on 25th November 2020 with covid-19 precautions in place for participants and staff. All participants completed the interview, with 56 older adolescents responding to the interview questions directly, and for 264 participants their accompanying parent or guardian assisted the child/adolescent with responding to the interview questions. All participants underwent physical examination and pulse oximetry, and 312 completed the six-minute walk exercise test.

The 320 enrolled participants were of median (IQR) age 13.1 (10.1–16.1) years; 80 (25%) were aged <10 years, 147 (46%) were female, and the majority (57%) were in primary school (Table 1). They were largely of lower socio-economic status as reflected by their home characteristics; 61% lived in one- or two-room houses, 71% of homes used pit latrines, with 44% of households using a shared latrine with other households. Pollution exposure was moderate to high from various sources; 51% to polluting cooking fuel at home, 87% to air pollution near home or school and 76% to car exhaust from high vehicle traffic near their home or school. CAT scores varied ranging from 0–22, with 78%, 10.3% and 11.3% participants having scores between 0–4, 5–9 and 10–22 respectively reflecting low, average and higher impact of their respiratory symptoms on their overall health-related quality of life.

Table 1. Sociodemographic and home environmental characteristics of study participants.

Characteristic Detail Frequency or median Percent or IQR
Sociodemography      
Sex Female 147 45.9%
Current age (years) Median 13.1 10.1, 16.1
Current age group (years) a <7 41 12.8%
7 to 9 39 12.2%
10 to 14 132 41.3%
15 to <20 108 33.8%
Current level of education Pre-primary 38 12.0%
Primary 183 57.0%
Secondary and higher 99 31.0%
No of rooms in house 1 99 30.9%
2 97 30.3%
3+ 124 38.8%
Household density No. persons per room 2 (1, 3)
Type of toilet Flush 92 28.8%
Pit latrine 228 71.3%
Shared toilet Yes 141 44.1%
No 179 55.9%
Air Pollution      
Polluting cooking fuel Low 159 49.7%
Moderate 101 31.6%
High 60 18.8%
Car exhaust exposure Low 77 24.1%
Moderate 48 15.0%
High 195 60.9%
Outdoor pollution exposure Low 42 13.1%
Moderate 91 28.4%
  High 187 58.4%
COPD Assessment Test (impact of respiratory disease on quality of life)  
CAT score categories 0–4 (low impact) 251 78.4%
5–9 (average impact) 33 10.3%
  10+ (higher impact) 36 11.3%
Caregiver Characteristics
Who filled the interview form? Parent/guardian 264 82.5%
Adolescent 56 17.5%
Relationship of accompanying caregiver to child Mother 192 72.7%
N = 264 Father 27 10.2%
Otherb 45 17.0%
Accompanying caregiver age in years <25 12 4.5%
N = 264 25–35 54 20.5%
36–45 126 47.7%
>45 65 24.6%
Not stated 7 2.7%
Caregiver no. of years education c 0 to 8 years 95 33.7%
N = 282 9 to 12 years 115 40.8%
>12 years 72 25.5%
Median no. years 12 8, 13

a-Additional detail on children <10 yrs: 14 (4.4%) were age <5 yr; 66 (20.6%) were age 5–9 yrs.

b-Other: grandparent 11 (4.2%), aunt/uncle 26 (9.8%), elder sibling/cousin 8 (3.0%). C-includes information

on parent/guardian education provided by older adolescents age 18–19 yr who came unaccompanied.

Characteristics of the 264 parents/guardians who accompanied the participant were as follows: 4.5% were age <25 years, 21% age 25–35 years, 48% age 36–45 years, and 25% above 45 years. Seventy-three percent were mothers, 10% fathers, 4% grandparents, and 10% aunty or uncle to the participant. Regarding their caregiver education 34%, 41% and 25.5% had received between 1–8 years, 9–12 years, and >12 years of formal education respectively.

HIV clinical characteristics

Median age for ART initiation was 5.5 (IQR 3.5–7.9) years, and 44% had initiated ART before the age of five years (Table 2). At enrolment into HIV care, 46% of 252 had advanced HIV disease (WHO clinical stage III or IV). Overall, 17.2% had history of TB and 33.1% had history of pneumonia. Prophylactic cotrimoxazole was started before age five years in 34% of the participants, and isoniazid preventive therapy was taken prior to age 10 years by only 25%.

Table 2. HIV clinical characteristics of the study participants.

Characteristic Detail Frequency or median Percent or IQR
HIV Disease Characteristics at entry to care and during follow-up  
WHO stage at enrolment to care I—II 136 54.0%
N = 252 III—IV 116 46.0%
Age started ART in yrs a <2 38 12.0%
N = 317 2 to <5 102 32.2%
5 to <10 126 39.7%
10+ 51 16.1%
Median 5.5 3.5, 7.9
Highest ever viral load (c/ml) b <10,000 217 72.0%
N = 301 10,000 - <100,000 44 15.0%
100,000+ 40 13.0%
Prior lung infection TB and pneumonia 22 6.9%
N = 320 Pneumonia only 84 26.3%
TB only 33 10.3%
No TB no pneumonia 169 52.8%
Don’t know 12 3.8%
Age started cotrimoxazole (yrs) <5 108 34.4%
N = 314 5 to 9 169 53.8%
10+ 37 11.8%
Age took isoniazid prophylaxis (yrs) <10 69 25.0%
N = 273 10 to 14 133 49.0%
  15+ 71 26.0%
Current HIV Clinical Characteristics  
Current ART regimen First line 272 85.0%
N = 320 Second or 3rd line 48 15.0%
Current CD4 percent <15% 10 3.3%
n = 306 15 to 24% 48 15.7%
25 to 34% 142 46.4%
35%+ 106 34.6%
Current CD4 count (cells/mm3) <500 36 11.3%
N = 318 500–999 158 49.7%
1000+ 124 39.0%
Latest viral Load (c/ml) <50 252 78.8%
N = 320 50–999 41 12.8%
1000+ 27 8.4%
Body mass index Z score c BMI-Z ≥ -1 (normal) 221 68.9%
N = 320 BMI-Z < -1 to -2 (mild) 69 21.5%
BMI-Z < -2 (mod-severe)f 30 9.4%
Weight for age Z score d WAZ ≥ -1 (normal) 202 63.0%
N = 320 WAZ < -1 to -2 (mild) 76 24.0%
WAZ < -2 (mod-severe) 42 13.0%
Height for age Z score e HAZ ≥ -1 (normal) 190 59.0%
N = 320 HAZ < -1 to -2 (mild) 80 25.0%
  HAZ < -2 (mod-severe) 50 16.0%

a-Yrs denotes years b-c/ml = copies/millilitre c-BMI denotes wasting. d-WAZ denotes underweight. e-HAZ denotes stunting. f-Mod-severe denotes moderate-to-severe.

Highest recorded viral load during follow-up was available for 301 participants, and 28% had VL >10,000 c/ml. Of note, viral load was not always routinely performed prior to ART initiation due to programmatic guideline changes over the years and therefore these reported values reflect VL after ART initiation for some children. Current median CD4 percent was 31% (IQR 27%, 37%), and current median CD4 count was 897 (IQR 685, 1148) cells/mm3, and 11% of children were immune suppressed with CD4 count <500 cells/mm3. Recent viral load revealed that 79% had undetectable virus (<50 copies/ml), 13% had low viraemia 50–999 copies/ml (c/ml), and 8% had higher viraemia of ≥1000. Current nutritional status was as follows: 9.4% had moderate-to-severe wasting (BMI z-score <-2), 16% were moderate-severely stunted (HAZ <-2), and 13% were moderate-severely underweight (WAZ <-2).

Clinical presentation of respiratory disease in children and adolescents

Respiratory symptoms and signs

Recurrent or persistent symptoms reported in the preceding twelve months include: breathlessness (40%), cough (23%), sputum/congested chest (15%), tight chest (13%) and chest pain (8%) (Table 3). Seventy-eight (24%) had experienced a chest problem in the preceding year, of these, 45 had experienced chest problems two or more times. Respiratory-focused physical examination revealed that 52% of participants had tachypnoea, 6% had tachycardia, 6% had finger clubbing and only 3% had abnormal chest auscultatory findings. No participant had hypoxia at rest, SPO2 ranged from 95% to 99%.

Table 3. Burden and spectrum of respiratory symptoms and signs and six-minute walk test results among all CAHIV, and by age category.
Clinical Feature (N = 320) Detail All Participants (N = 320) Children 0–9 yr (N = 80) Adolescents 10–19 yr (N = 240)
    Freq % Freq % Freq %
Respiratory Symptoms (N = 320)             
Cough Any cough 73 22.8% 22 27.5% 51 21.3%
Mod-severe 47 14.7% 17 21.3% 30 12.5%
Congested chest or sputum Any congestion 49 15.3% 15 18.8% 34 14.2%
Mod-severe 37 11.6% 13 16.3% 24 10.0%
Breathlessness a Any breathlessness 129 40.3% 25 31.3% 104 43.3%
Mod-severe 89 27.8% 17 21.3% 72 30.0%
Tight chest Yes 40 12.5% 7 8.8% 33 13.8%
Mod-severe 25 7.8% 5 6.3% 20 8.3%
Chest pain Yes 26 8.1% 0 0.0% 26 10.8%
Had a chest problem in past year Yes 78 24.4% 22 27.5% 56 23.3%
No episodes of chest problem past year One 33 10.3% 4 5.0% 29 12.1%
Two or More 45 14.1% 18 22.5% 27 11.3%
Examination Findings (N = 320)
           
Tachypnoa at rest b ≥90th centile 167 52.2% 30 37.5% 137 57.1%
RR centile for age ≥99th centile 91 28.4% 19 23.8% 72 30.0%
Tachycardia at rest c ≥90th centile 20 6.3% 5 6.3% 15 6.3%
HR centile for age ≥99th centile 4 1.3% 0 0.0% 4 1.7%
Finger clubbing Present 18 5.6% 9 11.3% 9 3.8%
6 Minute Walk Test Results (N = 312)  All Participants (N = 312) Children 0–9 yr (N = 73) Adolescents 10–19 yr (N = 239)
Percent of expected distance achieved Median (IQR) 77 83–70 74 81–69 78 83–72
Min, max 312 42–105 73 46–101 239 42–105
Degree of exercise limitation (% of expected distance achieved) None (≥80%) 129 41.3% 21 28.8% 108 45.2%
Mild (70–79%) 117 37.5% 32 43.8% 85 35.6%
Mod (60–69%) 53 17.0% 14 19.2% 39 16.3%
Severe (50–59%) 10 3.2% 5 6.8% 5 2.1%
V severe (<50%) 3 1.0% 1 1.4% 2 0.8%
Drop in oxygen saturation during exercise d Drop 0–1% 249 79.8% 58 79.5% 191 79.9%
Drop by 2% 41 13.1% 9 12.3% 32 13.4%
Drop by ≥3% 22 7.1% 6 8.2% 16 6.7%
Breathless during exercise (MRC dyspnoea score) e 1 (no dyspnoea) 104 33.3% 34 46.6% 70 29.3%
2 (mild) 93 29.8% 18 24.7% 75 31.4%
3 (moderate) 105 33.7% 20 27.4% 85 35.6%
4 (severe) 10 3.2% 1 1.4% 9 3.8%
5 (very severe) 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Participant report of fatigue during the exercise test using Borg face score (N = 306): no fatigue-27%, mild-37%, moderate-30%, severe fatigue-7%. a-Get out of breath when climbing stairs or a hill. b-Respiratory rate centile for age. c-Heart rate centile for age. d-Difference in oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry pre- and post-exercise. e-Medical Research Council dyspnoea score.

Burden of respiratory symptoms are further reported by age-group in Table 3. The 80 enrolled children age <10 years had slightly higher burden of cough, chest congestion and recurrent chest problems in the preceding year than the 240 enrolled adolescents. Conversely exertional dyspnoea, tight chest and chest pain were reported more often among adolescents than children.

Six minute walk test (6MWT)

Seventy-three children age <10 years and 239 adolescents successfully completed a 6MWT, results are displayed in Table 3. Of note, 22 children age <6 years successfully completed the exercise test (youngest were 3.1 and 3.7 years) and only two children deviated from brisk walk protocol by skipping for a short distance during the walk. Children with severe symptoms (n = 3) too young <3 years (n = 2), mentally impaired (n = 2) or physically disabled (n = 1) did not undertake the exercise test.

The 312 children and adolescents walked a median (IQR) distance of 573 (508–629) metres. The minimum and maximum distance walked were 256 and 863 metres respectively, and computed expected distance ranged from a low of 42% to a high of 105% compared to the healthy reference population. One hundred and eighty-three (59%) of 312 participants had reduced walk distance (<80% of expected distance). Further categorisation of reduced walk distance was as follows—37.5% achieved between 70–79% of expected (mild exercise limitation), 17% achieved 60–69% expected (moderate limitation), and 4% walked below 60% expected distance (severe limitation). Moderate-to-severe exercise limitation was proportionately more common among children <10 years than adolescents (27% versus 19% respectively).

Assessment of breathlessness at the end of the 6MWT by MRC dyspnoea score revealed that 67% experienced dyspnoea (score 2–4). Severity of dyspnoea was mild in 30%, moderate in 34%, and severe in 3%, with 33% reporting no dyspnoea. Moderate to severe dyspnoea during exercise (MRC 3–4) was more common among adolescents’ than children (39% vs 29% respectively). Comparison of pre- and post-exercise SPO2 revealed that 22 (7%) of participants desaturated by three percent or more during exercise. Fatigue during exercise using Borg face score was reported as follows: 27% were not fatigued, 37% felt mild, 30% moderate, and 7% severe fatigue.

Prevalence and severity of chronic lung disease

Chronic lung disease–basic definition (≥2 of five clinical criteria)

Synthesis of participant-specific data on respiratory clinical symptoms and signs suggestive of CLD is displayed in Table 4. Of the 320 participants: 37% had no respiratory symptoms or signs, 38% had one, 18% had two, and 7.6% had three or more clinical characteristics suggestive of CLD. A total of 82 participants had two or more of five clinical features, giving a CLD prevalence of 25.6% (95% confidence interval 20.8–30.4%) using this basic definition.

Table 4. Prevalence and severity of chronic lung disease in the study participants: Two clinical diagnostic approaches.
Characteristic (N = 320) Detail Chronic lung disease basic approach (5 clinical feature) Chronic lung disease enhanced approach (add exercise limitation)
Freq % Freq %
No. of clinical features suggestive of CLD a No. of symptoms/signs present        
Basic approach CLD:
Assess 5 symptoms/signs: chronic cough, breathlessness
(MRC >2), SPO2 desaturation ≥3%, RR ≥99th centile, clubbing.
Enhanced approach CLD: add moderate-to-severe exercise limitation.
None 117 36.6% 104 32.5%
One symptom or sign 121 37.8% 106 33.1%
Two symptoms / signs 59 18.4% 71 22.2%
Three symptoms / signs 21 6.6% 31 9.7%
Four symptoms / signs 2 0.6% 7 2.2%
Five symptoms / signs 0 0.0% 1 0.3%
Six symptoms / signs NA NA 0 0.0%
Chronic Lung Disease Classification        
  Present (≥ 2 clinical features) 82 25.6% 110 34.4%
Absent (0–1 clinical feature) 238 74.4% 210 65.6%
Symptom phenotype among those with CLD Specific symptom cough/breathless (N = 82) (N = 110)  
  Cough only 10 12.2% 13 11.8%
Breathless only (MRC >2)b 37 45.1% 52 47.3%
Cough and breathless 30 36.6% 30 27.3%
Neither cough nor breathlessness 5 6.1% 15 13.6%
  Total with cough 40 48.8% 43 38.7%
Total with breathlessness 67 81.7% 82 73.9%
Severity of CLD symptoms/signs Severity classification (N = 82)   (N = 110)  
Cough severity No cough 42 51.2% 67 60.9%
Mild-to-moderate 26 31.7% 29 26.4%
Severe 14 17.1% 14 12.7%
Breathless severity by MRC dyspnoea score b MRC 1 (none) 6 7.3% 17 15.5%
MRC 2 (mild) 9 11.0% 11 10.0%
MRC 3 (moderate) 58 70.7% 72 65.5%
MRC 4 (severe) 9 11.0% 10 9.1%
SPO2 desaturation with exercise.c
(5-criteria CLD N = 80.
6-criteria CLD N = 108)
No change 44 55.0% 61 56.5%
1–2% drop 19 23.8% 30 27.8%
3% or more 17 21.3% 17 15.7%
Finger clubbing Present 7 8.5% 10 9.1%
Absent 75 91.5% 100 90.9%
Six-minute walk test Severity of exercise limitation     (N = 110)  
Percent of expected distance achieved. 80% and above (no limitation) NA NA 19 17.3%
(N = 110) 70–79% (mild limitation) NA NA 40 36.4%
  60–69% (moderate limitation) NA NA 42 38.2%
  <60% (severe limitation) NA NA 9 8.2%

a-Chronic lung disease. b-Medical Research Council dyspnoea score. c-Difference in oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry pre- and post-exercise. NA-not applicable.

The commonest symptom phenotypes of breathlessness and cough were prevalent as follows among the 82 participants with CLD; 40 (49%) had cough, and 67 (82%) were breathless (MRC score >2); 10 (12%) had cough only, 37 (45%) had breathlessness only, 30 (37%) had both cough and breathlessness, while five participants had neither cough nor breathlessness. Analysing severity of CLD symptoms and signs among the 82 participants with CLD, 17% had severe cough (scored 4–5 on the 5-point Likert scale of the CAT), 11% had severe breathlessness (MRC score 4), 21% experienced a decline in oxygen saturation of 3% or more during exercise testing and 9% had finger clubbing.

Enhanced definition of chronic lung disease (≥2 of six criteria)

Adding the criterion of moderate-to-severe exercise limitation (6MWT distance <70% of expected distance for age) to the definition, resulted in identification of an additional 28 (total 110) children as having CLD (Table 4). The prevalence of CLD by this enhanced definition increased from 25.6% to 34.4% (95% CI 29.2–39.6%). Of the 110, 39% had cough and 74% were breathless; 13 (12%) had cough only, 52 (47%) had breathlessness only, 30 (27%) had both cough and breathlessness and 15 had neither cough nor breathlessness. Severity of CLD symptoms and signs were as follows: 13% had severe cough, 9% had severe breathlessness, 16% experienced a decline in oxygen saturation of 3% or more during exercise testing, and 9% had finger clubbing.

Factors associated with chronic lung disease

Sociodemographic and pollution exposure factors

The prevalence of CLD (basic definition) was higher in older adolescents aged 15–19 years than young adolescents 10–14 years or children <10 years (36% vs 19% vs 23% respectively), odds ratio (OR) 1.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01–3.75, p = 0.008 (Table 5). CLD was more prevalent among those currently in secondary school compared to lower levels (35% vs 16%. OR 2.92 [1.11–7.65]). We did not detect a significant difference in CLD prevalence between males and females. Parents/guardians with fewer years of education had higher odds of having a child with CLD compared to those with college level education (>12 years education); 1–8 years education OR 2.46 [1.10–5.50], and 9–12 years education OR 2.39 [1.09, 5.22], test for linear trend p = 0.040. There was a higher prevalence of CLD in participants living in one or two roomed houses compared to houses with more rooms (31% vs 18%, OR 2.05 [1.18–3.55]). Households of children with CLD were less likely to use polluting cooking fuel (7% vs 23%, OR 0.26, [0.10–0.64]). Those with high outdoor pollutant exposure had higher prevalence of CLD compared to those with low outdoor pollutant exposure (31% vs 12%, OR 3.31 [1.11–9.90]). Exposure to vehicle exhaust was similar in the two groups. Median CAT scores were higher among participants with CLD compared to those without CLD (5 vs 0, respectively, p<0.001), suggesting that respiratory symptoms negatively impacted health-related quality of life among CAHIV with CLD.

Table 5. Sociodemographic and environmental factors associated with chronic lung disease in the study population (unadjusted analysis).
Characteristic Detail N CLD Present (N = 82) CLD Absent (N = 238) Odds Ratio (95% CI) p value P across groupsc
Freq  % Freq  %
Sociodemography                    
Current age in years Median (IQR) 320 14 (11,17) 12 (9,15) 0.0056
Current age group <10 80 18 22.5% 62 77.5% Ref
10 to 14 132 25 18.9% 107 81.1% 0.8 (0.41, 1.59) 0.532 [0.023]
15 to 19 108 39 36.1% 69 63.9% 1.95 (1.01, 3.75) 0.046 {0.008}
Sex Male 147 38 25.9% 109 74.2% 1.02 (0.62, 1.69)
Female 173 44 25.4% 129 74.6% Ref 0.932
Education level Pre-primary 38 6 15.8% 32 84.2% Ref
Primary 183 41 22.4% 142 77.6% 1.54 (0.60, 3.94) 0.367 [0.006]
Secondary 99 35 35.4% 64 64.7% 2.92 (1.11, 7.65) 0.031 {0.021}
Toilet type Pit latrine 225 63 27.9% 163 72.1% 1.53 (0.85, 2.72) 0.154
Flush 94 19 20.2% 75 79.8% Ref
No. rooms in home 1 to 2 196 60 30.6% 136 69.4% 2.05 (1.18, 3.55) 0.011
>2 124 22 17.7% 102 82.3% Ref
Household density Mean (SD) 320 2.4 (1.6) 2.0 (1.6)     0.055
Caregiver education 0 to 8 years 95 27 28.4% 68 71.6% 2.46 (1.10, 5.50) 0.028 [0.054]
N = 282 9 to 12 years 115 32 27.8% 83 72.2% 2.39 (1.09, 5.23) 0.029 {0.040}
>12 years 72 10 13.9% 62 86.1% Ref
Pollution Exposure                
Use polluting cook fuel a Low 159 48 30.2% 111 69.8% Ref
Moderate 101 28 27.7% 73 72.3% 0.89 (0.51, 1.54) 0.67
High 60 6 10.0% 54 90.0% 0.26 (0.10, 0.64) 0.003 {0.008}
Car exhaust exposure Low 77 16 20.8% 61 79.2% Ref
Moderate 48 14 29.2% 34 70.8% 1.57 (0.68, 3.60) 0.287
High 195 52 26.7% 143 73.3% 1.39 (0.73, 2.62) 0.314 {0.503}
Any outdoor pollution exposure b Low 42 5 11.9% 37 88.1% Ref
Moderate 91 29 31.9% 62 68.1% 3.46 (1.23, 9.72) 0.018
High 132 31 23.5% 101 76.5% 2.27 (0.82, 6.28) 0.114
  Very high 55 17 30.9% 38 69.1% 3.31 (1.11, 9.90) 0.032 {0.068}
COPD Assessment Test (HR-QoL)        
CAT score Median (IQR) 320 5 (0,11) 0 (0,3) 0.000
CAT score categories 0–4 (higher QoL) 251 38 15.10% 213 84.90% Ref
5–9 (average QoL) 33 19 57.60% 14 42.40% 7.61 (3.51,16.50) 0.000 [0.000]
  10+ (lower QoL) 36 25 69.40% 11 30.60% 12.7 (5.79,28.0) 0.000 {0.000}

a Among 82 with CLD 6 (8%) had high pollutant cook fuel exposure; among 238 without CLD 53 (23%) had high polluting cook fuel exposure.

b Among 82 with CLD 17 (21%) had high outdoor pollution exposure; among 238 without CLD 38 (16%) had high outdoor pollution exposure.

c {} Chi-square test for homogeneity across groups. [] test for linear trend across groups]. CLD = Chronic lung disease, basic definition. OR = odds ratio. CI = confidence interval. SD = standard deviation. IQR = inter-quartile range 25th, 75th centile. HR-QoL = health-related quality of life assessed using COPD assessment test.

HIV disease factors at time of entry into HIV care and during follow-up

Compared to participants without CLD those who had CLD: started ART later (median age 6.9 vs 5.1 years, p = 0.003), started cotrimoxazole prophylaxis later (median age 7 vs 5 years, p = 0.0001), initiated isoniazid preventive therapy later (median age 14 vs 12 years, p = 0.005) and had higher mean peak viral load (162,662 vs 66,782 copies/ml respectively, p = 0.045). WHO clinical stage and BMI at entry to care did not differ between the two groups (Table 6).

Table 6. Clinical factors associated with chronic lung disease in the study population (unadjusted analysis).
Characteristic Detail N CLD Present (N = 82) CLD Absent (N = 238) Odds ratio  95% CI  p value  P across groupsa
      Freq or median % or IQR Freq or median % or IQR
Age started ART in years <5 140 26 18.6% 114 81.4% Ref
N = 317 5 to 9 126 37 29.4% 89 70.6% 1.82 (1.03, 3.23) 0.04 [0.0173]
10+ 51 19 37.3% 32 62.7% 2.60 (1.28, 5.29) 0.008 [0.0046]
Median 317 6.9 4.1, 8.8 5.1 3.3, 7.2% 0.003
Baseline WHO Stage 1–2 136 46 33.8% 90 66.2% Ref
N = 252 3–4 116 29 25.0% 87 75.0% 0.65 (0.38,1.13) 0.128
Prior Lung Infection TB and pneumonia 22 9 40.9% 13 59.1% 2.85 1.12, 7.24 0.027
N = 308 Pneumonia only 84 26 31.0% 58 69.0% 1.85 1.02, 3.36 0.045 {0.0413}
TB only 33 11 33.3% 22 66.7% 2.06 0.91, 4.67 0.083 [0.0072]
No TB no Pneumonia 169 33 19.5% 136 80.5% Ref
Either TB or pneumonia Either TB or Pneumonia 139 46 33.1% 93 66.9% 2.04 1.21, 3.42 0.007
N = 308 No TB no Pneumonia 169 33 19.5% 136 80.5%
Age started cotrimoxazole (years) <5 108 20 18.5% 88 81.5%
N = 314 5 to <10 169 44 26.0% 125 74.0% 1.55 (0.85,2.81) 0.149 {0.012}
10+ 37 16 43.2% 21 56.8% 3.35 (1.49,7.55) 0.003 [0.004]
Median age CTX 314 7 (4.5,9) 5 (3.6,7) 0.0001
Age took IPT (years) <10 69 13 18.8% 56 81.2% Ref
N = 273 10 to <14 133 27 20.3% 106 79.7% 1.09 (0.52,2.29) 0.805 {0.004}
15+ 71 28 39.4% 43 61% 2.81 (1.30,6.05) 0.009 [0.0047]
Median age IPT 273 14 (11,16) 12 (9,14) 0.0052
Highest recorded viral load (c/ml) Mean (SD) 301 162,663 (586,012) 55,783 (239,296) 0.045
Highest recorded viral load (c/ml)
N = 301
<10k 217 53 24.4% 164 75.6% Ref
10k to <100k 44 10 22.7% 34 77.3% 0.91 (0.42,1.97) 0.811 {0.332}
  100k+ 40 14 35.0% 26 65.0% 1.67 (0.81,3.42) 0.164 [0.245]
Current Clinical Status            
Recent viral load (c/ml) Undetectable or <50 254 58 22.8% 196 77.2% Ref
50 to <400 30 8 26.7% 22 73.3% 1.22 (0.52,2.91) 0.639 {0.021}
400+ 36 16 44.4% 20 55.6% 2.7 (1.32,5.55) 0.007 [0.0077]
Current CD4% <15% 10 4 40.0% 6 60.0% 2.01 (0.55,7.36) 0.291
N = 306 15–24% 47 15 31.9% 32 68.1% 1.41 (0.72,2.78) 0.316 {0.374}
25%+ 249 62 24.9% 187 75.1% Ref [0.161]
Current CD4 count (cells/mm3) Median 318 896 700, 1150 900 658, 1146 0.862
Height for age Median HAZ 318 -0.915 (-1.67,-0.22) -0.67 (-1.39,0.27) 0.042
Body mass index for age Median BMI-Z 318 -0.085 (-1.1,0.49) -0.375 (-1.22,0.23)     0.052  

CLD = chronic lung disease, basic definition. ART = antiretroviral therapy. WHO stage = World Health Organisation HIV clinical stage. TB = tuberculosis. IPT = isoniazid preventive therapy. OR = odds ratio. CI = confidence interval. SD = standard deviation. IQR = inter-quartile range 25th, 75th centile. QoL = quality of life. c/ml = copies per millilitre. a {} Chi-square test for homogeneity across groups. [] test for linear trend across groups.

CAHIV with prior TB and/or pneumonia had higher prevalence of CLD compared to those with no prior lung infection (33% vs 19%, OR 2.04 [1.21–3.42]). Compared to CAHIV with no prior pneumonia or TB, those with history of having had both TB and pneumonia had the highest risk of CLD (41% vs 19%. OR 2.85 [1.12–7.24]), followed by those who had experienced TB only (33% vs 19%. OR 2.06 [0.91–4.67]) or pneumonia only (31% vs 19%. OR 1.85 [1.02–3.36]).

Current HIV disease status: Increasing viraemia was associated with increasing prevalence of CLD; 23%, 27% and 44% among those with viral load <50c/ml, between 50 to <400 and ≥400c/ml respectively (OR 2.7 [1.32–5.55], linear trend p = 0.008). Declining immunity appeared to be associated with a trend for increasing prevalence of CLD; 24.9%, 31.9% and 40.0% among those with CD4% of 25% and higher, 15–24% and <15% respectively (linear trend p = 0.161). Median current CD4 count was similar between participants with and without CLD (896 vs 900 cells/mm3). Participants with CLD had lower height for age z-score than those without CLD (median -0.92 vs -0.67, p = 0.042). Median BMI z-score and median weight for age z-score were not different between the two groups.

Multivariable analysis of associated factors

Ultimately eight factors entered the multivariable logistic regression model (Table 7, model 1). Age at ART initiation, at co-trimoxazole initiation and current age were correlated, therefore we retained age at ART initiation in the final model (Table 7, model 2). In the final model the following factors remained correlated with CLD: prior TB or pneumonia—adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.15, 95% CI 1.18–3.91, living in smaller houses of 1–2 rooms (aOR 1.95, [1.02–3.73]), CAT score (aOR 6.91 [3.66–13.03]) and use of polluting cooking fuel (aOR 0.35 [0.13–0.94]). Initiation of ART after age 5 years showed a trend for association with CLD (aOR 1.73 [0.93–3.20]).

Table 7. Factors associated with chronic lung disease (multivariable analysis).
Model 1 (N = 297)        
Characteristic Detail Adjusted OR 95% CI P value
Current age 10–14 vs <10yr 1.29 0.52, 3.23 0.580
15–19 vs <10yr 1.49 0.51, 4.36 0.463
Age started cotrimoxazole 5+ vs <5yr 0.63 0.17, 2.33 0.489
Age started ART 5+ vs <5yr 2.12 0.64, 6.97 0.217
Prior TB or pneumonia Yes vs no 1.99 1.07, 3.70 0.030
CAT score (HR-QoL) CAT score 5+ vs <5 7.45 3.84, 14.43 0.000
Use polluting cook fuel Moderate vs low 0.84 0.42, 1.66 0.613
High vs low 0.43 0.15, 1.19 0.105
No. rooms in house 1–2 vs >2 1.89 0.95, 3.76 0.071
Viral load (copies/ml) 50+ vs <50 1.30 0.61, 2.81 0.498
Model 2 (N = 305)      
Characteristic Detail Adjusted OR 95% CI P value
Age started ART 5+ vs <5 yr 1.73 0.93, 3.20 0.081
Prior TB or pneumonia Yes vs No 2.15 1.18, 3.91 0.013
Use polluting cook fuel Moderate vs low 0.75 0.39, 1.43 0.380
High vs low 0.35 0.13, 0.94 0.037
No rooms in house 1–2 vs >2 1.95 1.02, 3.73 0.042
CAT score (HR-QoL) CAT score 5+ vs <5 6.91 3.66, 13.03 0.000

OR = odds ratio. CI = confidence interval. CAT = COPD assessment test. HR-QoL = health related quality of life.

Discussion

Our study shows that chronic respiratory symptoms are common in CAHIV and affect all age-groups including young children. The commonest identified symptoms and signs were exertional breathlessness, chronic cough, tachypnoea and exercise limitation. A simple clinical diagnostic approach for CLD using presence of two or more of five clinical symptoms and signs identified one-quarter to have CLD, and addition of exercise limitation (reduced 6MWT distance) as a sixth criteria identified additional CLD cases. CLD was associated with prior TB or pneumonia, delayed initiation of ART, cotrimoxazole and isoniazid prophylaxis, detectable viraemia and sociodemographic factors, and had a negative impact on quality of life.

Our study included 80 children age <10 years, an age group for whom minimal data exists, and to our knowledge is the first study to evaluate CLD in African children below six years. We found that children had a similar prevalence to those aged 10–14 years. This was unexpected as younger children were born during the era of immediate start of ART at diagnosis of HIV during infancy, whereas those born before 2012 started ART only when they had more advanced clinical stage or depressed CD4 counts. This evidence suggests that even young children commenced on early ART are at risk of developing CLD. A more expected finding was that the older adolescents had the highest prevalence of CLD, likely a reflection of delayed ART initiation after progressive HIV disease and a higher incidence of lung infections over time.

Previous studies report chronic respiratory symptoms to be common in CAHIV, especially in those not established on ART or those who had delayed initiation [2, 1517, 27, 28]. We found that most participants with cough also had increased sputum or chest congestion, as also seen in other studies [15, 16, 29]. Breathlessness was the most prevalent symptom and one-third reported moderate-to-severe exertional breathlessness during a 6MWT. Previous studies involving CAHIV in Zimbabwe and Malawi of a similar age range observed breathlessness in 11–34% [17, 27, 28, 30] and studies involving adolescents in Kenya and Zimbabwe found prevalence ranging 29–35% [15, 16]. In contrast, exertional breathlessness was uncommon in South African adolescents affecting only 3.4% [31]. Differences across settings may reflect cultural differences in perception of symptom severity or variation in approaches to assessing breathlessness. Researchers in Malawi and Zimbabwe used the New York Heart Association score, whereas Kenyan and South African studies used MRC dyspnoea score.

A quarter of participants reported a chest problem in the preceding year, and on more than one occasion in 14%. Prior studies in a similar age range as our study reported recurrent chest problems or antibiotics for respiratory problems in the preceding year in 21–22% of CAHIV [17, 27], with a higher prevalence (41%) in a study of adolescents [16]. This may be a useful additional criterion for clinical identification of CAHIV at risk of CLD. Respiratory symptoms such as tight chest, wheeze or chest pain were less common, as observed in other African paediatric studies [1517, 27, 30, 31]. Tachypnoea at rest was common as in several previous studies that used a similar definition [32, 33], and more common than in studies that used a fixed cut-off of RR >25/min or >30/min regardless of age [16, 27, 28], suggesting that variation may be due to categorisation used for tachypnoea. Finger clubbing, abnormal chest auscultatory findings and hypoxia at rest were uncommon and may indicate more advanced disease. Desaturation during exercise is a sign of impaired respiratory physiology likely to be more sensitive than hypoxia at rest [34]; it was observed in one-fifth of participants with CLD in our study and has been commonly reported elsewhere, especially in adolescents with HIV [1517, 28, 32]. Early detection using readily available clinical features could potentially enable early treatment, and potentially reduce progression of CLD in this vulnerable population. Studies are needed that correlate clinical findings with objective evaluation of stage or severity of CLD.

There are limited investigations available in resource limited settings to objectively evaluate respiratory function, especially in young children. We performed 6MWT in all participants and one-fifth had moderate-to-severe exercise limitation. We found 6MWT to be feasible in children as young as three years with almost all completing and adhering to the protocol to objectively detect exercise induced desaturation and dyspnoea. In one previous African study that conducted 6MWT the youngest child was nine years (range 9–14 years), and participants achieved a lower median walk distance during 6MWT compared to ours [35]. A study in Zimbabwe involving children with and without HIV age 6–16 years used the incremental shuttle walk test which is a more aggressive exercise test than the 6MWT, and walk distance was significantly lower in children and adolescents with HIV compared to those without HIV [17]. In our study, adding exercise test distance as a sixth clinical feature to define CLD increased CLD prevalence in study population from 25.6 to 34.4%, an increase by one-third.

Despite challenges, a definition of CLD that facilitates clinical management but also standardises research evaluation and reporting is important, including for comparison between studies and over time in a range of settings [36]. Over the past decade, researchers have used varying approaches to define CLD in CAHIV initially using combinations of clinical symptoms and signs such as in the earliest proposed definition by Ferrand et al. in adolescents [16] which reported that 71% of adolescents had physician diagnosed CLD, higher than that observed in our cohort. Later in a younger cohort, Rylance et al. proposed a definition of any one of chronic cough, dyspnoea (MRC >1), or hypoxia at rest or with exercise which found, similar to our cohort, that 25% of participants had CLD [17]. Mwalukomo et al. proposed two clinical phenotypes in their study on CAHIV based on the commonest symptom (cough in 37.5%) and one common sign (hypoxia or desaturation with exercise in 38.8%) noting that only 22% had both cough and hypoxia [27]. Having cough and/or breathlessness with exertion identified around 90% of CLD in our cohort, but missed those in whom these symptoms are absent. The additional objective evaluations such as a brisk walk exercise test and pulse oximetry that we employed in our study are feasible at the primary health care level. Pulse oximetry is also increasingly available in lower-level health facilities. These findings provide additional evidence that may be helpful to inform clinical diagnostic protocols suitable for resource limited settings where there is minimal access to more costly diagnostics such as paediatric lung function testing and chest imaging.

Factors associated with chronic lung disease

The identification of factors associated with CLD may help inform interventions for improved prevention and care [2, 10]. CLD in our cohort was associated with late initiation of ART and high viral load as previously described [2, 36]. We also found that previous pneumonia or tuberculosis were associated with CLD, also consistent with previous studies [2, 10, 12, 15, 36, 37]. The novel finding in our cohort was that earlier initiation of cotrimoxazole preventive treatment (CPT) and of isoniazid preventive treatment (IPT) were associated with a reduced risk of CLD. This may not be surprising as CPT and IPT prevent lung infections and disease such as bacterial pneumonia, pneumocystis pneumonia and tuberculosis [2, 12, 38]. However, there is no previously published evidence that earlier CPT and/or IPT may reduce or prevent chronic lung sequelae in CAHIV. This has clear implications for prevention and management of CLD.

We noted that stunting was more common in CAHIV with CLD than those without but the implications for management are uncertain. Other studies have varying findings, hypoxia was associated with 3-fold increased odds of stunting in adolescents with HIV in Kenya [32], however prevalence of stunting was similar among CAHIV in Malawi with or without chronic cough [27]. Chronic respiratory morbidity can certainly negatively impact on growth in children by a number of mechanisms but whether nutritional support could reduce progression and severity of CLD is less certain. Finally, CLD had a negative impact on health-related quality of life in this cohort, as has been observed in Malawi where CAHIV with chronic cough had significantly lower scores on physical domains of the quality-of-life assessment tool [27]. Our findings underscore the importance of diagnosing HIV as early as possible in perinatally-infected children and providing comprehensive care with early ART initiation and prevention of respiratory infections to reduce the burden of CLD, and minimise morbidity associated with CLD.

Our participants had high exposure to air pollution both indoors and outdoors. Air pollution exposure causes chronic lung inflammation and progressive pathology regardless of HIV status. Exposure to indoor air pollution is a particular risk in low-income settings and is a potentially modifiable risk exposure that may be targeted as an intervention to reduce respiratory morbidity in this high-risk population [2, 10, 39, 40]. An unexpected finding was that families whose children had chronic respiratory symptoms were less likely to use polluting cooking fuel in the home than those whose children did not. It is plausible that when there is a child with respiratory symptoms in the home, a family would be more cautious and take measures to minimise smoke exposures inside the home. Given that most participants live in small houses of only one or two rooms they would have limited income to spend on the more expensive clean cooking fuels, and this is evidenced by the fact that some households with sick children did use polluting cooking fuel.

Study limitations and strengths

Our study had several limitations. Firstly, our study population comprises children and adolescents receiving care at a tertiary referral hospital which may not represent the whole population of CAHIV with possible biases towards those with complications arising from severe HIV disease such as CLD. Secondly, survival bias may have impacted our findings given that this was an assessment of CAHIV still alive and in care at our hospital, and those who may have died due to more severe lung disease may be under-represented in this study. Thirdly, information on prior history of tuberculosis or pneumonia were largely from self-report rather than clinical records and so subject to recall bias. Fourthly, participants entered care during different years. Viral load and CD4 tests were not always routinely done at entry to care due to changing national guidelines over time so baseline results were not available for all participants. Finally, as previously highlighted, there are limitations inherent in definitions used to detect and evaluate CLD, especially less severe or minimally symptomatic disease. The strengths of our study include a large sample size and generation of insight on CLD in younger children who have been under-represented in previous studies. Our findings are possibly generalizable to CAHIV in care in tertiary care centres in low- and middle-income countries.

Conclusions and recommendations

CLD affects one-third of CAHIV in an African setting, is prevalent in all age groups, and most are symptomatic with cough and/or exertional breathlessness. CLD significantly impacts their health-related quality of life, and is associated with prior lung infections, delayed ART, delayed prophylaxis against respiratory infections and socio-environmental factors. We conclude that a simple diagnostic approach using common respiratory symptoms and signs may be used to identify children and adolescents with CLD. There is need to increase awareness on the burden of CLD in the growing population of CAHIV. This evidence may be helpful to inform policy and guidelines for chronic lung disease in CAHIV, and to advocate for targeted structured clinical services specific to their needs in order to minimise morbidity and optimise their health and wellbeing.

Supporting information

S1 Checklist. PLOS’ questionnaire on inclusivity in global research.

(PDF)

S1 Table. STROBE statement: Chronic lung disease in children and adolescents with HIV in Kenya.

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

The authors are indebted to “The Breathe Poa Study” children, adolescents and their parents/guardians, without their willing participation this research would not have been possible. We also appreciate the University of Nairobi and Kenyatta National Teaching and Referral hospital for providing a supportive environment to undertake this research. We would like to thank the entire clinical team and the data team for their dedicated diligent work throughout this research project. Special appreciation to Ms Electine Oyuga who coordinated all study logistics; to Daisy Chebet, Lynette Njeri and Eugene Makori for careful clinical assessments and exercise testing, to Christine Kundu for data management, to Peter Maleche Obimbo and Japheth Owiny for assistance in data organisation and analysis, and to Lynette Njeri for assistance in formatting of references.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

EMO received the award. Grant no. KNH/R&P/23 I/3/11. Funding Institution: Kenyatta National Hospital. URL: https://knh.or.ke. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.UNAIDS AIDSinfo: Global epidemiology on HIV and response. 2022 factsheets. Accessed on 17th August 2022. Available from: https://aidsinfo.unaids.org/ [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Githinji L, Zar HJ. Respiratory complications in children and adolescents with human immunodeficiency virus. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2021. Feb;68(1):131–145. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2020.09.016 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Obimbo EM, Mbori-Ngacha DA, Ochieng JO, Richardson BA, Otieno PA, Bosire R, et al. Predictors of early mortality in a cohort of human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected African children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2004. Jun;23(6):536–43. doi: 10.1097/01.inf.0000129692.42964.30 ; PMCID: PMC3380074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wamalwa DC, Obimbo EM, Farquhar C, Richardson BA, Mbori-Ngacha DA, Inwani I, et al. Predictors of mortality in HIV-1 infected children on antiretroviral therapy in Kenya: a prospective cohort. BMC Pediatr. 2010. May 18; 10:33. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-10-33 ; PMCID: PMC2887829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Njuguna IN, Cranmer LM, Wagner AD, LaCourse SM, Mugo C, Benki-Nugent S, et al. Brief report: cofactors of mortality among hospitalized HIV-infected children initiating antiretroviral therapy in Kenya. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019. Jun 1;81(2):138–144. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002012 ; PMCID: PMC6609091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.De Beaudrap P, Thiam M, Diouf A, Toure-Kane C, Ngom-Gueye NF, Vidal N, et al. (2013) Risk of virological failure and drug resistance during first and second-line antiretroviral therapy in a 10-year cohort in Senegal: results from the ANRS 1215 cohort. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr., 62, 381–387. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31827a2a7a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Prasitsuebsai W, Sethaputra C, Lumbiganon P, Hansudewechakul R, Chokephaibulkit K, Truong KH, et al. TApHOD ACASI study group of IeDEA Asia-Pacific. Adherence to antiretroviral therapy, stigma and behavioral risk factors in HIV-infected adolescents in Asia. AIDS Care. 2018. Jun;30(6):727–733. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2018.1425363 ; PMCID: PMC5912939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Achwoka D, Waruru A, Chen TH, Masamaro K, Ngugi E, Kimani M, et al. Noncommunicable disease burden among HIV patients in care: a national retrospective longitudinal analysis of HIV-treatment outcomes in Kenya, 2003–2013. BMC Public Health. 2019. Apr 3;19(1):372. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6716-2 ; PMCID: PMC6448214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.McHugh G, Rylance J, Mujuru H, Nathoo K, Chonzi P, Dauya E, et al. Chronic morbidity among older children and adolescents at diagnosis of HIV infection. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr., November 1, 2016. 73(3): p 275–281. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001073 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Verwey C, Gray DM, Dangor Z, Ferrand RA, Ayuk AC, Marangu D, et al. Bronchiectasis in African children: challenges and barriers to care. Front Pediatr. 2022. Jul 25; 10:954608. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.954608 ; PMCID: PMC9357921 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jespersen NA, Axelsen F, Dollerup J, Nørgaard M, Larsen CS. The burden of non-communicable diseases and mortality in people living with HIV (PLHIV) in the pre-, early- and late-HAART era. HIV Med. 2021. Jul;22(6):478–490. doi: 10.1111/hiv.13077 ; PMCID: PMC8247855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kay AW, Rabie H, Maleche-Obimbo E, Sekadde MP, Cotton MF, Mandalakas AM. HIV-associated tuberculosis in children and adolescents: evolving epidemiology, screening, prevention and management strategies. Pathogens. 2021. Dec 29;11(1):33. doi: 10.3390/pathogens11010033 ; PMCID: PMC8780758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Attia EF, Miller RF, Ferrand RA. Bronchiectasis and other chronic lung diseases in adolescents living with HIV. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2017. Feb;30(1):21–30. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000325 ; PMCID: PMC5408733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zifodya JS, Temu TM, Masyuko SJ, Nyale G, Kinuthia J, Page ST, et al. HIV, pulmonary infections, and risk of chronic lung disease among Kenyan adults. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021. Dec;18(12):2090–2093. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202103-251RL ; PMCID: PMC8641811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Attia EF, Maleche-Obimbo E, West TE, Ndukwe-Wambutsi L, Kiptinness C, Cagle A, et al. Adolescent age is an independent risk factor for abnormal spirometry among people living with HIV in Kenya. AIDS (London, England). 2018. Jun;32(10):1353–1359. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001815 ; PMCID: PMC6834296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ferrand RA, Desai SR, Hopkins C, Elston CM, Copley SJ, Nathoo K, et al. Chronic lung disease in adolescents with delayed diagnosis of vertically acquired HIV infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2012. Jul;55(1):145–52. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis271 ; PMCID: PMC3369563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rylance J; Mchugh G, Metcalfe J, Mujuru H, Nathoo K, Wilmore S, et al. Chronic lung disease in HIV-infected children established on antiretroviral therapy. AIDS, November 28, 2016, 30(18), 2795–2803. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001249 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Liu J, Maleche-Obimbo E, Shanthikumar S, Graham SM. A scoping review of lung function in children and adolescents living with HIV in the era of antiretroviral treatment. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2023. May;58(5):1344–1354. doi: 10.1002/ppul.26365 Epub 2023 Mar 21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ddungu A, Semitala FC, Castelnuovo B, Sekaggya-Wiltshire C, Worodria W, Kirenga BJ. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease prevalence and associated factors in an urban HIV clinic in a low-income country. PLoS One. 2021. Aug 13;16(8): e0256121. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256121 ; PMCID: PMC8362990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Maleche-Obimbo E, Odhiambo MA, Njeri L, Mburu M, Jaoko W, et al. Magnitude and factors associated with post-tuberculosis lung disease in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS Glob Public Health 2(12) 2022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000805 pgph.0000805 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.ATS committee on proficiency standards for clinical pulmonary function laboratories. ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002. Jul 1;166(1):111–7. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.166.1.at1102 Erratum in: Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 May 15;193(10):1185. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.British Medical Research Council dyspnoea/breathlessness scale. Available from: https://www.mrc.ac.uk/research/facilities-and-resources-for-researchers/mrc-scales/mrc-dyspnoea-scale-mrc-breathlessness-scale/.
  • 23.Kuczmarski RJ, Ogden CL, Grummer-Strawn LM, Flegal KM, Guo SS, Wei R, et al. CDC growth charts: United States. Adv Data. 2000. Jun 8;(314):1–27. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ben Saad H, Prefaut C, Missaoui R, Mohamed IH, Tabka Z, Hayot M. Reference equation for 6-min walk distance in healthy North African children 6–16 years old. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2009. Apr;44(4):316–24. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20942 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Fleming S, Thompson M, Stevens R, Heneghan C, Plüddemann A, Maconochie I, et al. Normal ranges of heart rate and respiratory rate in children from birth to 18 years of age: a systematic review of observational studies. Lancet. 2011. Mar 19;377(9770):1011–8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62226-X ; PMCID: PMC3789232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. Formulas 3.18 & 3.19. 1st ed. John Wiley & Sons, London, 218, 1981. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Mwalukomo T, Rylance SJ, Webb EL, Anderson S, O’Hare B, van Oosterhout JJ, et al. Clinical characteristics and lung function in older children vertically infected with human immunodeficiency virus in Malawi. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2016. Jun;5(2):161–9. doi: 10.1093/jpids/piv045 ; PMCID: PMC5407134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rylance S, Rylance J, McHugh G, Majonga E, Bandason T, Mujuru H, et al. Effect of antiretroviral therapy on longitudinal lung function trends in older children and adolescents with HIV infection. PLoS One. 2019. Mar 21;14(3). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213556 ; PMCID: PMC6428265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Desai SR, Nair A, Rylance J, Mujuru H, Nathoo K, McHugh G, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus-associated chronic lung disease in children and adolescents in Zimbabwe: chest radiographic and high-resolution computed tomographic findings. Clin Infect Dis. 2018. Jan 6;66(2):274–281. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix778 ; PMCID: PMC5850005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Majonga ED, Rehman AM, Simms V, Mchugh G, Mujuru HA, Nathoo K, et al. High prevalence of echocardiographic abnormalities in older HIV-infected children taking antiretroviral therapy. AIDS. 2018. Nov 28;32(18):2739–2748. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002031 ; PMCID: PMC6250247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Githinji LN, Mahtab S, Zühlke L, Lawrenson J, Myer L, Gray D, et al. Cardiopulmonary dysfunction in perinatally HIV-infected South African adolescents on antiretroviral therapy: baseline findings from the Cape Town adolescent antiretroviral cohort. J Int AIDS Soc. 2019. Jul;22(7). doi: 10.1002/jia2.25340 ; PMCID: PMC6619484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Attia EF, Weiss NS, Maleche Obimbo E, McGrath CJ, Cagle A, West TE, et al. Risk factors for hypoxia and tachypnea among adolescents with vertically-acquired HIV in Nairobi. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2017. Apr;36(4). doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000001453 ; PMCID: PMC5348269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.McHugh G, Rehman AM, Simms V, Gonzalez-Martinez C, Bandason T, Dauya E, et al. ; BREATHE clinical trial team. Chronic lung disease in children and adolescents with HIV: a case-control study. Trop Med Int Health. 2020. May;25(5):590–599. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13375 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.WHO pulse oximetry training manual. Available from: https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/patient-safety/pulse-oximetry/who-ps-pulse-oxymetry-training-manual-en.pdf?sfvrsn=322cb7ae_6
  • 35.Githinji LN and Gray DM. Lung function in South African adolescents infected perinatally with HIV and treated long-term with antiretroviral therapy. Ann Am Thorac Soc, 2017, 14, 722–729. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201612-1018OC [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Weber HC, Gie RP, Cotton MF. The challenge of chronic lung disease in HIV-infected children and adolescents. J Int AIDS Soc. 2013. Jun 18;16(1):18633. doi: 10.7448/IAS.16.1.18633 ; PMCID: PMC3687079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.du Plessis AM, Andronikou S, Zar HJ. Chest imaging findings of chronic respiratory disease in HIV-infected adolescents on combined antiretroviral therapy. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2021. Jun; 38:16–23. doi: 10.1016/j.prrv.2020.06.022 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Chintu C, Bhat GJ, Walker AS, Mulenga V, Sinyinza F, Lishimpi K, et al. ; CHAP trial team. Co-trimoxazole as prophylaxis against opportunistic infections in HIV-infected Zambian children (CHAP): a double-blind randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2004. Nov 20–26;364(9448):1865–71. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17442-4 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Gordon SB, Bruce NG, Grigg J, Hibberd PL, Kurmi OP, Lam KB, et al. Respiratory risks from household air pollution in low and middle-income countries. Lancet Respir Med. 2014. Oct;2(10):823–60. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70168-7 ; PMCID: PMC5068561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Attia EF, Moraa H, Maleche-Obimbo E, Wamalwa D, Gómez LA, Rylance S, et al. Most early-treated children with perinatally acquired HIV have preserved lung function at school age. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2022. Jan 1;89(1):69–76. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002823 ; PMCID: PMC8665226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Judith Kose

7 Jul 2023

PONE-D-23-16528Prevalence, clinical presentation and factors associated with chronic lung disease among children and adolescents living with HIV in KenyaPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Maleche-Obimbo,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

Please find below reviewr comments for your kind attention:

Reviewer 1

Abstract

Line 43: not clear what is the difference between exertional breathless and exercise limitation line 45.

Methods

Can the authors reference their definition of enhanced chronic lung disease (CLD)? Is their definition of enhanced CLD in literature?

Results

Table 1: what is the rationale of grouping children into <7 years, <7-9 years? Why not under 5 years category and 5-9 years old, for instance?

Line 247: what does the term “chest problem” refer to?

Table 4: CLD and CLD enhanced-are not those with breathlessness double counted with those with exercise limitation and vice versa?

Line 348 “took INH prophylaxis later” Please rephrase this statement to denote late initiation of INH prophylaxis

Line 353 “pneumonia” does this term perhaps refer to non-TB lower respiratory tract infection?

Can the term enhanced CLD be referenced from published literature?

Discussion

Line 399: exertional breathless vs exercise limitation. please see my comment above. Could the reduced distance walked during 6MWT in Table 4 be due to low oxygen saturation or breathlessness and hence this sub-group is already counted in the above?

Line 433 “chest problems” does this term refer to pain, infections, tight chest, etc?

Line 497 the authors state that stunting and CLD implication of management is uncertain. Is this true, considering stunting denotes chronic malnutrition and nutrition impacts lung growth; height for instance impacts lung function.

References

Refs 11 and 39 are the same, Verwey, et al.

Reviewer 2

1. This is an interesting study addressing a topic with clear scientific value. Due to the period of the study (covid-19), with the exception of the standardized six-minute walk test (6MWT) being carried out outdoors for safety precautions, no other implications of covid-19 are mentioned in the study results. Evaluate and discuss implications of covid-19 on study results, if applicable.

2. There is need to provide a study profile including n of screened participants, n of excluded and n of participants included in the different evaluations for a understanding of the reader.

3. Actors should mention in the article the definition of outdoor pollution exposure definition.

4. Although the article collected information on the level of education, this seems to me to be decisive for older adolescents. In younger children, the child's health is mostly determined by the caregiver's education and not the child's. A limitation of the study is the fact that there is no information on the primary caregiver's education and also no information on who the questionnaire was administered to.

===================================

Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 21 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  •  A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'. 

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submissionguidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorialemail&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols. 

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Judith Kose, M.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please include a complete copy of PLOS’ questionnaire on inclusivity in global research in your revised manuscript. Our policy for research in this area aims to improve transparency in the reporting of research performed outside of researchers’ own country or community. The policy applies to researchers who have travelled to a different country to conduct research, research with Indigenous populations or their lands, and research on cultural artefacts. The questionnaire can also be requested at the journal’s discretion for any other submissions, even if these conditions are not met.  Please find more information on the policy and a link to download a blank copy of the questionnaire here: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/best-practices-in-research-reporting. Please upload a completed version of your questionnaire as Supporting Information when you resubmit your manuscript.

3. Please include your full ethics statement in the ‘Methods’ section of your manuscript file. In your statement, please include the full name of the IRB or ethics committee who approved or waived your study, as well as whether or not you obtained informed written or verbal consent. If consent was waived for your study, please include this information in your statement as well. 

4. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments:

Thank for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. This is a very well written paper and addresses a key topic. The study findings are very relevant to low-to-middle-income settings where HIV-related lung disease is common. We have reviewed the manuscript. Please find below comments for your attention

Reviewer 1

Abstract

Line 43: not clear what is the difference between exertional breathless and exercise limitation line 45.

Methods

Can the authors reference their definition of enhanced chronic lung disease (CLD)? Is their definition of enhanced CLD in literature?

Results

Table 1: what is the rationale of grouping children into <7 years, <7-9 years? Why not under 5 years category and 5-9 years old, for instance?

Line 247: what does the term “chest problem” refer to?

Table 4: CLD and CLD enhanced-are not those with breathlessness double counted with those with exercise limitation and vice versa?

Line 348 “took INH prophylaxis later” Please rephrase this statement to denote late initiation of INH prophylaxis

Line 353 “pneumonia” does this term perhaps refer to non-TB lower respiratory tract infection?

Can the term enhanced CLD be referenced from published literature?

Discussion

Line 399: exertional breathless vs exercise limitation. please see my comment above. Could the reduced distance walked during 6MWT in Table 4 be due to low oxygen saturation or breathlessness and hence this sub-group is already counted in the above?

Line 433 “chest problems” does this term refer to pain, infections, tight chest, etc?

Line 497 the authors state that stunting and CLD implication of management is uncertain. Is this true, considering stunting denotes chronic malnutrition and nutrition impacts lung growth; height for instance impacts lung function.

References

Refs 11 and 39 are the same, Verwey, et al.

Reviewer 2

1. This is an interesting study addressing a topic with clear scientific value. Due to the period of the study (covid-19), with the exception of the standardized six-minute walk test (6MWT) being carried out outdoors for safety precautions, no other implications of covid-19 are mentioned in the study results. Evaluate and discuss implications of covid-19 on study results, if applicable.

2. There is need to provide a study profile including n of screened participants, n of excluded and n of participants included in the different evaluations for a understanding of the reader.

3. Actors should mention in the article the definition of outdoor pollution exposure definition.

4. Although the article collected information on the level of education, this seems to me to be decisive for older adolescents. In younger children, the child's health is mostly determined by the caregiver's education and not the child's. A limitation of the study is the fact that there is no information on the primary caregiver's education and also no information on who the questionnaire was administered to.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This is a well-written article on a very important topic. 

Abstract

Line 43: not clear what is the difference between exertional breathless and exercise limitation line 45.

Methods

Can the authors reference their definition of enhanced chronic lung disease (CLD)? Is their definition of enhanced CLD in literature?

Results

Table 1: what is the rationale of grouping children into <7 years, <7-9 years? Why not under 5 years category and 5-9 years old, for instance?

Line 247: what does the term “chest problem” refer to?

Table 4: CLD and CLD enhanced-are not those with breathlessness double counted with those with exercise limitation and vice versa?

Line 348 “took INH prophylaxis later” Please rephrase this statement to denote late initiation of INH prophylaxis

Line 353 “pneumonia” does this term perhaps refer to non-TB lower respiratory tract infection?

Can the term enhanced CLD be referenced from published literature?

Discussion

Line 399: exertional breathless vs exercise limitation. please see my comment above. Could the reduced distance walked during 6MWT in Table 4 be due to low oxygen saturation or breathlessness and hence this sub-group is already counted in the above?

Line 433 “chest problems” does this term refer to pain, infections, tight chest, etc?

Line 497 the authors state that stunting and CLD implication of management is uncertain. Is this true, considering stunting denotes chronic malnutrition and nutrition impacts lung growth; height for instance impacts lung function.

References

Refs 11 and 39 are the same, Verwey, et al.

Reviewer #2: 1. This is an interesting study addressing a topic with clear scientific value. Due to the period of the study (covid-19), with the exception of the standardized six-minute walk test (6MWT) being carried out outdoors for safety precautions, no other implications of covid-19 are mentioned in the study results. Evaluate and discuss implications of covid-19 on study results, if applicable.

2. There is need to provide a study profile including n of screened participants, n of excluded and n of participants included in the different evaluations for a understanding of the reader.

3. Actors should mention in the article the definition of outdoor pollution exposure definition.

4. Although the article collected information on the level of education, this seems to me to be decisive for older adolescents. In younger children, the child's health is mostly determined by the caregiver's education and not the child's. A limitation of the study is the fact that there is no information on the primary caregiver's education and also no information on who the questionnaire was administered to.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2023 Aug 9;18(8):e0289756. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289756.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


20 Jul 2023

Academic Editor Requirements:

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

• A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'. DONE

• A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'. DONE

• An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'. DONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

Response: We have formatted our manuscript to conform to PLOS ONE’s style requirements.

2. Please include a complete copy of PLOS’ questionnaire on inclusivity in global research in your revised manuscript. Our policy for research in this area aims to improve transparency in the reporting of research performed outside of researchers’ own country or community. The policy applies to researchers who have travelled to a different country to conduct research, research with Indigenous populations or their lands, and research on cultural artefacts. The questionnaire can also be requested at the journal’s discretion for any other submissions, even if these conditions are not met. Please find more information on the policy and a link to download a blank copy of the questionnaire here: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/best-practices-in-research-reporting. Please upload a completed version of your questionnaire as Supporting Information when you resubmit your manuscript.

Response: The lead researchers and co-investigators are Kenyan citizens and conducted research within our own country Kenya. The policy therefore may not really apply to us, nevertheless I have filled this form as requested.

3. Please include your full ethics statement in the ‘Methods’ section of your manuscript file. In your statement, please include the full name of the IRB or ethics committee who approved or waived your study, as well as whether or not you obtained informed written or verbal consent. If consent was waived for your study, please include this information in your statement as well.

Response: We have included this information in the Methods section of the manuscript.

4. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Response: We have done so. One new reference was added in methods section (ref 22). One reference citation which we had inadvertently duplicated in the ref list (was cited twice as ref 11 and ref 39) this was corrected. Total number of references remains 41.

New reference no. 22:

ATS committee on proficiency standards for clinical pulmonary function laboratories. ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Jul 1;166(1):111-7. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.166.1.at1102. Erratum in: Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 May 15;193(10):1185. PMID: 12091180.

Duplicated reference (pointed out by the second reviewer) now cited once as ref no. 11:

Verwey C, Gray DM, Dangor Z, Ferrand RA, Ayuk AC, Marangu D, et al. Bronchiectasis in African children: challenges and barriers to care. Front Pediatr. 2022 Jul 25; 10:954608. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.954608. PMID: 35958169; PMCID: PMC9357921

Responses to Reviewer Comments

Reviewer 1

Abstract

Line 43: not clear what is the difference between exertional breathless and exercise limitation line 45.

Response: Exertional breathlessness – this was the response to the question “do you get short of breath when you climb stairs or when walking uphill?”. This question was posed to the child/adolescent during the interview.

Exercise limitation – this refers to limitation in physical activity. This was assessed using a standardized exercise test – the six-minute walk test commonly used to assess if an individual has limitation in physical activity, or exercise limitation (Ref 22). A participant walks as fast as they can on flat ground for six minutes, and the total distance walked is recorded. The distance achieved is then compared against a benchmark of the expected distance that a healthy child of similar height, weight and age should walk, and reported as a percentage of predicted distance (ref 25). Details on the methods and classification of exercise limitation are provided in methods section of the manuscript (manuscript with tracked changes: p6, lines 135-137, p8 lines 170-172).

Methods

Can the authors reference their definition of enhanced chronic lung disease (CLD)? Is their definition of enhanced CLD in literature?

Response: There are no standardized definitions of chronic lung disease for HIV infected children and adolescents, and researchers have used varying definitions tailored to their specific studies and clinical settings, these studies are mentioned in the introduction section of the manuscript (line 89, refs 10-11, 15-21). They are further mentioned in the discussion section (p31, lines 548 – 554, refs 17, 18).

We examined the various definitions in published literature in CAHIV on this subject, when considering which symptoms and signs to use in the CLD definition in our study. The commonest symptoms suggestive of CLD used across studies are chronic cough, and breathlessness. Common physical examination signs suggestive of CLD used across studies include finger clubbing, and abnormal oxygen saturation were also popular. Some studies subjected participants to exercise but the outcome parameters used were exercise induced breathlessness, and hypoxia/desaturation, and the exercise tests used differed from ours (p20 – 30, lines 502-511, 519 – 527, 538-542, refs 16-18, 28-32). We found one study by Githinji et al on CAHIV that conducted the six-minute walk test and measured walk distance as an outcome of interest, however they did not use this parameter as part of diagnosis for CLD (p30,line 536-538, ref 36). They conducted extensive lung function testing as their main diagnostic tool for diagnosis of CLD.

Results

Table 1: what is the rationale of grouping children into <7 years, <7-9 years? Why not under 5 years category and 5-9 years old, for instance?

Response: We noted from review of literature that previous researchers had excluded children below 7 years – so our study is the first to provide insight on this problem among children <7 years. For this reason we thought it useful to display the number of children of age-group <7 yr that we enrolled in this study. We have added a footer to table 1 stating: “Additional detail on children <10 yrs: 14 (4.4%) were age <5 yr; 66 (20.6%) were age 5-9 yr.” (p12, line 261).

Line 247: what does the term “chest problem” refer to?

Response: The participants were asked “In the last 12 months have you had a chest problem, outside of a common cold?”

Further details of the chest problem were also asked – specifically we asked if they had experienced congested chest, tight chest, or chest pain in the preceding 12 months.

Table 4: CLD and CLD enhanced-are not those with breathlessness double counted with those with exercise limitation and vice versa?

Response: Thank you for this thoughtful query. We also considered this when examining our findings. In this study population some children experienced neither symptom, some experienced one and not the other, whereas some experienced both breathlessness and exercise limitation. The latter group would then be identified with two symptoms suggestive of CLD, but those with only one of the two criteria would not be identified as CLD based on these two specific clinical features. It is unclear why some breathless children achieved normal walk distance and others did not, and vice versa. We do note that the enhanced definition appears to capture additional subjects who were not identified using the basic CLD approach.

There is indeed need for further research to better elucidate the pathophysiology leading to breathlessness and to exercise limitation, and the interaction between the two, as well as other clinical symptoms and signs suggestive of chronic lung pathology.

Line 348 “took INH prophylaxis later” Please rephrase this statement to denote late initiation of INH prophylaxis

Response: This has been rephrased. (p21, Line 420)

Line 353 “pneumonia” does this term perhaps refer to non-TB lower respiratory tract infection?

Response: The participants were asked if “Have you ever had pneumonia or chest infection other than TB”. In general any acute chest infection is described as “pneumonia” by non-medical persons in our setting, and is not distinguished from bronchiolitis or bronchitis.

Can the term enhanced CLD be referenced from published literature?

Response: The term is “enhanced definition of CLD” rather than “enhanced CLD”. This is a term specific to this study. We have given more detailed response to this in the earlier comment raised by the reviewer, please see earlier section.

Discussion

Line 399: exertional breathless vs exercise limitation. Please see my comment above. Could the reduced distance walked during 6MWT in Table 4 be due to low oxygen saturation or breathlessness and hence this sub-group is already counted in the above?

Response: Thank you for your thoughtful analysis of the various scenarios. We concur that exercise induced symptoms may then lead to a child slowing down and this in turn lead to reduced distance walked.

We tried to be conservative in the definition of exercise limitation and used a cut-off of “achieved <70% of predicted distance” or moderate limitation as opposed to <80% of predicted (includes those with mild exercise limitation) in order to minimize over-calling exercise limitation (p8, line 186 – 191).

In this study population all the 17 participants who experienced oxygen desaturation of 3% or more were identified in the basic CLD group, in other words all 17 had at least one additional symptom/sign (cough, breathlessness, tachypnoea or finger clubbing) regardless of distance walked.

Some children in our study reported being short of breath during the walk, but it did not limit their walk distance, and this group of children the enhanced CLD approach did not re-categorize them as CLD if they had none of the other four symptoms/signs. It is possible that children who got breathless but had no other respiratory symptoms or signs (suggestive of healthy respiratory system) and had normal walk distance were simply a bit physically unfit. Such a child would not be categorized as having CLD either with the basic definition or the enhanced definition.

The uestionn that you raise points to a need for further research that would provide insight into the pathologic changes and pathophysiology of CLD, and the relative importance of each specific respiratory symptom and sign in diagnosing CLD in these vulnerable CAHIV. We attempted to articulate some of these issues in the discussion of these findings.

Line 433 “chest problems” does this term refer to pain, infections, tight chest, etc?

Response: The participants were asked “In the last 12 months have you had a chest problem, outside of a common cold?”

They were also asked what type of chest problem they had experienced – specifically we asked if they had experienced congested chest, tight chest, or chest pain in the preceding 12 months.

Line 497 the authors state that stunting and CLD implication of management is uncertain. Is this true, considering stunting denotes chronic malnutrition and nutrition impacts lung growth; height for instance impacts lung function.

Response: Thank you for your thoughtful queries to this statement. Given that the height and CLD assessment were done at the same point in time, it is not possible to know which occurred before the other. We do concur with your observation that stunting may denote chronic malnutrition and nutrition impacts lung growth. However we were also cognissant of the fact that in these CAHIV causes of stunting may be multifactorial, due to chronic inadequate nutrition, or due to other HIV-related morbidity, and in CLD may be due to chronic sub-optimal oxygenation, or recurrent lung infections due to damaged lungs. For this reason we were cautious in our interpretation of this finding and its implications for management.

References

Refs 11 and 39 are the same, Verwey, et al.

Response: Thank you for pointing this out, we have deleted the duplicate ref 39, and re-aligned the references as appropriate.

Reviewer 2

1. This is an interesting study addressing a topic with clear scientific value. Due to the period of the study (covid-19), with the exception of the standardized six-minute walk test (6MWT) being carried out outdoors for safety precautions, no other implications of covid-19 are mentioned in the study results. Evaluate and discuss implications of covid-19 on study results, if applicable.

Response: Thank you for this comment, it is an important factor to consider. We have added a statement on effect of covid-19 pandemic at the beginning of the results (p10, lines 232 - 234). The statement reads as follows:

“Due to the covid-19 pandemic active enrolment was stopped on 18th March 2020 after enrolling the first 14 participants, and restarted eight months later on 25th November 2020 with covid-19 precautions in place for participants and staff”.

The major implication for the study is that enrolment took longer than initially anticipated, however we were still able to achieve the targeted sample size required for the study, and participants were able to complete the interview, physical examination and exercise testing since the latter was done outdoors. By the time we restarted the study parents were generally continuing with normal work and other activities, children were on school vacation and interacting freely within their neighborhoods. Very few study children (only two that we are aware of) were diagnosed with covid-19 during the study period, however access to testing was low due to the high cost of the test, and the low socio-economic status of our study population. The two children had mild covid-19 symptoms and recovered fully.

We see no additional significant implication of covid-19 on the study results.

2. There is need to provide a study profile including n of screened participants, n of excluded and n of participants included in the different evaluations for a understanding of the reader.

Response: Thank you for bringing this to our attention.

Details of screening, exclusion, enrolment and completion of clinical evaluations have been added in the first paragraph of the results (p10, line 229 – 232, 234 - 244).

Briefly we screened 326, two were ineligible as they were from a children’s home, and four potentially eligible children declined to participate due to non-interest. Of the 320 enrolled, all completed the interview, all underwent physical examination and pulse oximetry assessment, and 312 completed the six-minute walk exercise test.

There was very high acceptance by study participants, perhaps they felt it was beneficial to know the status of their (their child’s) lungs. The interviews and procedures were carried out largely by clinicians and nurses who had cared for the children and adolescents for many years, so they had good rapport with them.

3. Actors should mention in the article the definition of outdoor pollution exposure definition.

Response: We have added details on definition of outdoor pollution exposure in the methods section of the manuscript. (p7, line 157 – 160)

4. Although the article collected information on the level of education, this seems to me to be decisive for older adolescents. In younger children, the child's health is mostly determined by the caregiver's education and not the child's. A limitation of the study is the fact that there is no information on the primary caregiver's education and also no information on who the questionnaire was administered to.

Response: Thank you for this insightful comment, we concur it is an important characteristic to evaluate. We had omitted this data due to the size of the manuscript. We have now added the caregiver characteristics in table 1 (page 12). Caregiver education data available for 282 (88%) of 320 participants. We have added a summary of this information in the narrative. (p12-13, lines 264 – 269). Association between caregiver education and CLD is reported on Table 5 (p20-21, lines 401 – 407. Table 5 p23). Caregivers with fewer years of education (1-8 yrs) had higher odds of their child having CLD thank those with >12 years education (crude OR 2.46, 95% CI 1.10 – 5.50, p=0.028).

Due to missing data on >10% of participants, per the a-priori multivariable model statistical plan this was not added to the adjusted analysis. However caregiver education is associated with socio-economic status, which was represented in the final multivariable models by the variable number of rooms in the home, which was an independent predictor of CLD in this study population.

===================================

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Concluding Remarks.

The authors of the manuscript titled “Prevalence, clinical presentation and factors associated with chronic lung disease among children and adolescents living with HIV in Kenya (PONE-D-23-16528)” appreciate the careful review and comments by the two reviewers, and by the academic editor. We do hope that we have responded adequately to the comments of the reviewers, and that we have addressed all the requirements of the editors and journal.

We look forward to hearing from you.

Elizabeth Maleche-Obimbo

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.pdf

Decision Letter 1

Judith Kose

25 Jul 2023

Prevalence, clinical presentation and factors associated with chronic lung disease among children and adolescents living with HIV in Kenya

PONE-D-23-16528R1

Dear Dr. Obimbo,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Judith Kose, M.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Dear Dr Obimbo,

I hope this message finds you well.

Congratulations on your outstanding work and the significant contributions your research brings to the scientific community. Your manuscript showcases a commendable level of rigor, clarity, and originality, making it a valuable addition to our journal.

The revisions you made to the manuscript were thorough and addressed all the concerns raised during the peer review process. Your commitment to improving the manuscript has resulted in a much stronger and polished piece of work.

Thank you for choosing PLOS ONE as the platform to disseminate your valuable research.

Best regards,

Dr Kose

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Acceptance letter

Judith Kose

31 Jul 2023

PONE-D-23-16528R1

Prevalence, clinical presentation and factors associated with chronic lung disease among children and adolescents living with HIV in Kenya

Dear Dr. Maleche-Obimbo:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Judith Kose

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Checklist. PLOS’ questionnaire on inclusivity in global research.

    (PDF)

    S1 Table. STROBE statement: Chronic lung disease in children and adolescents with HIV in Kenya.

    (PDF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.pdf

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES