Skip to main content
PLOS Pathogens logoLink to PLOS Pathogens
. 2023 Jul 28;19(7):e1011112. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1011112

Ethanolaminephosphate cytidylyltransferase is essential for survival, lipid homeostasis and stress tolerance in Leishmania major

Somrita Basu 1, Mattie C Pawlowic 1,2, Fong-Fu Hsu 3, Geoff Thomas 1, Kai Zhang 1,*
Editor: Michael Boshart4
PMCID: PMC10411802  PMID: 37506172

Abstract

Glycerophospholipids including phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) and phosphatidylcholine (PC) are vital components of biological membranes. Trypanosomatid parasites of the genus Leishmania can acquire PE and PC via de novo synthesis and the uptake/remodeling of host lipids. In this study, we investigated the ethanolaminephosphate cytidylyltransferase (EPCT) in Leishmania major, which is the causative agent for cutaneous leishmaniasis. EPCT is a key enzyme in the ethanolamine branch of the Kennedy pathway which is responsible for the de novo synthesis of PE. Our results demonstrate that L. major EPCT is a cytosolic protein capable of catalyzing the formation of CDP-ethanolamine from ethanolamine-phosphate and cytidine triphosphate. Genetic manipulation experiments indicate that EPCT is essential in both the promastigote and amastigote stages of L. major as the chromosomal null mutants cannot survive without the episomal expression of EPCT. This differs from our previous findings on the choline branch of the Kennedy pathway (responsible for PC synthesis) which is required only in promastigotes but not amastigotes. While episomal EPCT expression does not affect promastigote proliferation under normal conditions, it leads to reduced production of ethanolamine plasmalogen or plasmenylethanolamine, the dominant PE subtype in Leishmania. In addition, parasites with episomal EPCT exhibit heightened sensitivity to acidic pH and starvation stress, and significant reduction in virulence. In summary, our investigation demonstrates that proper regulation of EPCT expression is crucial for PE synthesis, stress response, and survival of Leishmania parasites throughout their life cycle.

Author summary

In nature, Leishmania parasites alternate between fast replicating, extracellular promastigotes in sand fly gut and slow growing, intracellular amastigotes in macrophages. Previous studies suggest that promastigotes acquire most of their lipids via de novo synthesis whereas amastigotes rely on the uptake and remodeling of host lipids. Here we investigated the function of ethanolaminephosphate cytidyltransferase (EPCT) which catalyzes a key step in the de novo synthesis of phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) in Leishmania major. Results showed that EPCT is indispensable for both promastigotes and amastigotes, indicating that de novo PE synthesis is still needed at certain capacity for the intracellular form of Leishmania parasites. In addition, elevated EPCT expression alters overall PE synthesis and compromises parasite’s tolerance to adverse conditions and is deleterious to the growth of intracellular amastigotes. These findings provide new insight into how Leishmania acquire essential phospholipids and how disturbance of lipid metabolism can impact parasite fitness.

Introduction

Protozoan parasites of the genus Leishmania are transmitted through the bite of hematophagous sand flies. During their life cycle, Leishmania parasites alternate between flagellated, extracellular promastigotes in sand fly midgut and non-flagellated, intracellular amastigotes in mammalian macrophages. These parasites cause leishmaniasis which ranks among the top ten neglected tropical diseases with 10–12 million people infected and 350 million people at the risk of acquiring infection [1,2]. Drugs for leishmaniasis are plagued with strong toxicity, low efficacy, and high cost [3,4]. To develop better treatment, it is necessary to gain insights into how Leishmania acquire essential nutrients and proliferate in the harsh environment in the vector host and mammalian host.

To sustain growth, Leishmania parasites must generate abundant amounts of lipids including glycerophospholipids, sterols and sphingolipids. Phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) and phosphatidylcholine (PC) are two common classes of glycerophospholipids. Besides being major membrane constituents, PE and PC can function as precursors for several signaling molecules and metabolic intermediates including lyso-phospholipids, phosphatidic acid, diacylglycerol, and free fatty acids [5,6]. In addition, PE contributes to the synthesis of GPI-anchored proteins in trypanosomatid parasites by providing the ethanolamine phosphate bridge that links proteins to glycan anchors [7]. PE is also involved in the formation of autophagosome during differentiation and starvation in Leishmania major [8,9] and the posttranslational modification of eukaryotic elongation factor 1A in T. brucei [10].

For many eukaryotic cells, the majority of PE and PC are synthesized de novo via the Kennedy pathway (Fig 1) [11]. In Leishmania, the key metabolite ethanolamine phosphate (EtN-P) is generated from of the sphingoid base metabolism or the phosphorylation of ethanolamine (EtN) by ethanolamine kinase [12](Fig 1). EtN-P is then conjugated to cytidine triphosphate (CTP) to produce CDP-EtN and pyrophosphate by the enzyme ethanolaminephosphate cytidylyltransferase (EPCT) [13]. In the EtN branch of the Kennedy pathway, through the activity of ethanolamine phosphotransferase (EPT), CDP-EtN is combined with 1-alkyl-2-acyl-glycerol to eventually generate plasmenylethanolamine (PME) or ethanolamine plasmalogen, the dominant subtype of PE in Leishmania [14]. CDP-EtN can also be combined with 1,2-diacylglycerol to form 1,2-diacyl-PE (a minor subtype of PE in Leishmania) by choline ethanolamine phosphotransferase (CEPT) [15,16]. A similar branch of the Kennedy pathway is responsible for the de novo synthesis of PC (choline → choline-phosphate → CDP-choline → PC), with CEPT catalyzing the last step of conjugating CDP-choline and diacylglycerol into PC as a dual activity enzyme [1618]. Besides the Kennedy pathway, PE may be generated from the decarboxylation of phosphatidylserine (PS) in the mitochondria and PC may be generated from the N-methylation of PE [1921].

Fig 1. Synthesis of PE and PC in Leishmania.

Fig 1

SPT: Serine palmitoyltransferase; SK: Sphingosine kinase; SPL: sphingosine-1-phosphate lyase; EK: ethanolamine kinase; EPCT: ethanolaminephosphate cytidylyltransferase; EPT: ethanolamine phosphotransferase; CK: choline kinase; CPCT: cholinephosphate cytidylyltransferase; CEPT: choline ethanolamine phosphotransferase; PEMT: Phosphatidylethanolamine N-methyltransferase; EtN: ethanolamine; EtN-P: ethanolamine phosphate; AAG: 1-alkyl2-acyl glycerol; DAG: 1,2-diacylglycerol; CTP: cytidine triphosphate; CDP: cytidine diphosphate; CMP: cytidine monophosphate; PPi: pyrophosphate; PME: plasmenylethanolamine; diacyl PE: 1,2-diacyl-phosphatidylethanolamine, PC: 1,2-diacyl-phosphatidylcholine; SAM: S-adenosyl-L-methionine; SAH: S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine.

In addition to biosynthesis, Leishmania parasites (especially the intracellular amastigotes) can take up and modify existing lipids to fulfill their needs [2224]. For example, the enzyme CEPT which is directly responsible for producing PC and diacyl-PE (Fig 1) is essential for L. major promastigotes in culture but is not required for the survival or proliferation of amastigotes in mice [18]. While diacyl-PE is a minor lipid component in Leishmania, PC is highly abundant in both promastigotes and amastigotes [25,26]. These results argue that de novo PC synthesis is required to generate large amount of lipids to support rapid parasite replication during the promastigote stage (estimated doubling time: 6–8 hours in culture and 10–12 hours in sand fly) [27,28]. In contrast, intracellular amastigotes can acquire enough PC through the uptake and remodeling of host lipids, which seems to fit their slow growing, metabolically quiescent state (estimated doubling time: 60 hours) [29,30]. Consistent with these findings, sphingolipid analyses of L. major amastigotes revealed high levels of sphingomyelin which could not be synthesized by Leishmania but was plentiful in mammalian cells [31]. Conversely, the biosynthesis of parasite-specific sphingolipid, inositol phosphorylceramide (IPC), is fully dispensable for L. major amastigotes [12,31,32]. Collectively, these data suggest that as Leishmania transition from fast-replicating promastigotes to slow-growing amastigotes, they undergo a metabolic switch from de novo synthesis to scavenge/remodeling to acquire their lipids [24].

Despite of these findings, it is important to explore whether intracellular amastigotes retain some capacity for de novo lipid synthesis. Our previous studies on the sterol biosynthetic mutant c14dm¯ suggest that is the case [33]. L. major c14dm¯ mutants lack the sterol-14α-demethylase which catalyzes the removal of C-14 methyl group from sterol intermediates. Promastigotes of c14dm¯ are devoid of ergostane-type sterols (which are abundant in wild type [WT] parasites) and accumulate 14-methyl sterol intermediates. However, lipid analyses of lesion-derived amastigotes demonstrate that both WT and c14dm¯ amastigotes contain cholesterol (which must be taken from the host since Leishmania only synthesize ergostane-type sterols) as their main sterol [33]. Parasite-specific sterols, i.e., ergostane-type sterols such as ergosterol and 5-dehydroepisterol in WT amastigotes and C-14-methylated sterols in c14dm¯ amastigotes are only detected at trace levels. Nonetheless, c14dm¯ amastigotes show significantly attenuated virulence and reduced growth in comparison to WT and C14DM add-back amastigotes, suggesting that the residual amounts of endogenous sterols (which cannot be scavenged from the host) play pivotal roles in amastigotes which may constitute the basis for sterol biosynthetic inhibitors as anti-leishmaniasis drugs [33,34].

In this study, we investigated the roles of EPCT (EC 2.7.7.14) which catalyzes the conversion of EtN-P and CTP into CDP-EtN and pyrophosphate in the Kennedy pathway (Fig 1). Our previous study on EPT in L. major revealed that EPT is mostly required for the synthesis of PME but not diacyl PE or PC [14]. Disruption of EPCT, on the other hand, may have a much more profound impact on the synthesis of PME, diacyl PE and PC (which can be generated from diacyl PE via N-methylation) (Fig 1). In mammalian cells, EPCT is considered as the rate limiting enzyme in the EtN branch of the Kennedy pathway and a key regulator of PE synthesis [35,36]. Disruption of EPCT in mice leads to developmental defects and embryonic lethality [37,38]. Additional studies report EPCT heterozygous mice have increased diacylglycerol and triacylglycerol in liver that resemble features of metabolic diseases, suggesting that EPCT is involved in maintaining the homeostasis of neutral lipids as well [38,39]. In Trypanosoma brucei (a related trypanosomatid protozoan), RNAi knockdown of EPCT reduces de novo PE synthesis leading to growth arrest and altered mitochondrial morphology in procyclics [16,40,41]. Based on these findings, it is of interest to determine the roles of EPCT in Leishmania especially during the disease-causing intracellular stage when parasites acquire most of their lipids via scavenging. Our results indicate that EPCT is essential for the survival of both promastigotes and amastigotes in L. major. In addition, the expression level of EPCT is crucial for stress tolerance, lipid homeostasis and the synthesis of GPI-anchored proteins. These findings may inform the development of new anti-Leishmania drugs.

Results

Identification and functional verification of L. major EPCT

A putative EPCT gene was identified in the genome of L. major (Tritrypdb: LmjF 32.0890) with synthetic orthologs in other Leishmania spp., Trypanosoma brucei, and Trypanosoma cruzi. The predicted L. major EPCT protein consists of 402 amino acids and bears 35–42% identity to EPCTs from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Plasmodium falciparum, Arabidopsis thaliana, and Homo sapiens (S1 Fig).

To confirm its function, the EPCT open reading frame (ORF) was cloned into a pXG plasmid (a high copy number protein expression vector) [42] and introduced into L. major wild type parasites (WT) as WT+EPCT. When promastigote lysate from WT+EPCT was incubated with [14C]-EtN-P and CTP for 20 minutes at room temperature, we detected a radiolabeled product which exhibited similar mobility (retention factor) as pure CDP-EtN on thin layer chromatography (TLC), suggesting it was [14C]-CDP-EtN (Figs 2A and S2A). Radiolabeled CDP-EtN was also formed when [14C]-EtN-P and CTP were incubated with mouse liver homogenate, but not boiled lysates (Figs 2A and S2B). We did not detect significant amount of [14C]-CDP-EtN using WT lysate, indicating that the basal level of EPCT activity in L. major promastigotes was below the level of detection with this approach (Fig 2A and 2B, activity from WT was similar to buffer alone and boiled lysate). To determine the cellular localization of EPCT, a GFP-tagged EPCT was cloned into pXG plasmid and introduced into WT promastigotes to generate WT+GFP-EPCT. These WT+GFP-EPCT cells displayed similar EPCT activity levels as WT+EPCT cells (Fig 2A and 2B; 11–12 times higher than WT or boiled lysate, p<0.001). By western blot, GFP-EPCT was detected at the predicted molecular weight of ~73 kDa (Fig 2C) and mainly found in the cytosolic fraction after sub-cellular fractionation (Fig 2D). A previously reported cytoplasmic protein HSP83 [43] was detected in both the cytosolic and the large granule fractions (pellet 10K), whereas the plasma membrane-localized lipophosphoglycan (LPG) [44] was mainly found in the large granule fraction (Fig 2D). In addition, GFP-EPCT exhibited a cytoplasmic localization by fluorescence microscopy (Fig 2E). Together, these findings argue that L. major EPCT is a cytosolic enzyme capable of condensing EtN-P and CTP into CDP-EtN (Fig 1).

Fig 2. L. major EPCT is a functional enzyme located in the cytoplasm.

Fig 2

(A-B) Whole cell lysates (boiled and not boiled, two repeats were shown) of WT, WT+EPCT, and WT+GFP-EPCT promastigotes were incubated with [14C]-EtN-P followed by TLC analysis as described in Materials and Methods. Representative TLC images were shown in A and the average ratios of [14C]-CDP-EtN]:[14C]-EtN-P were normalized to WT (as 1.0) and summarized in B (error bars represent standard deviations from four repeats, ***: p < 0.001). (C) Promastigote lysates of WT and WT + GFP-EPCT were analyzed by western-blot using an anti-GFP antibody (top) or anti-α-tubulin antibody (bottom)(D) Whole cell lysate (1.0 x 106 cells) and sub-cellular fractions of WT + GFP-EPCT cells were probed by anti-GFP (top), -HSP83 (middle), or -LPG (bottom) antibodies. (E) Log phase promastigotes of WT+GFP-EPCT were examined by fluorescence microscopy. DIC: differential interference contrast. Scale bar: 10 μm. DNA: staining with Hoechst 33342. Merge: overlay of GFP and DNA.

Chromosomal EPCT-null mutants cannot be generated without a complementing episome

To determine whether EPCT is required for survival in L. major, we first attempted to delete the two chromosomal EPCT alleles using the homologous recombination approach [45]. As demonstrated by Southern blot (S3A and S3B Fig), we successfully replaced one EPCT allele with the blasticidin resistance gene (BSD) using this approach and generated several heterozygous EPCT+/- clones. However, repeated attempts to delete the second EPCT allele failed to recover any true knockouts (results from one attempt were shown in S3C and S3D Fig), suggesting that a different method is needed to generate chromosomal EPCT-null mutants.

We then adopted the complementing episome-assisted knockout approach that has been used to study essential genes in Leishmania [4648]. To do so, a pXNG4-EPCT plasmid (complementing episome) containing genes for EPCT, green fluorescence protein (GFP), nourseothricin resistance (SAT) and thymidine kinase (TK) was constructed and introduced into EPCT+/- parasites (EPCT+/- +pXNG4-EPCT), followed by attempts to delete the second chromosomal EPCT allele with the puromycin resistance gene (PAC) (S4 Fig). With this approach, we were able to generate multiple clones showing successful replacement of chromosomal EPCT with BSD and PAC (epct¯+ pXNG4-EPCT in Figs 3A–3D and S4). Southern blot with an EPCT ORF probe revealed high levels of pXNG4-EPCT plasmid (20–35 copies/cell) in these epct¯+ pXNG4-EPCT parasites but no endogenous EPCT was detected (Figs 3C, 3D and S4). Overexpression of EPCT from the pXNG4-EPCT plasmid did not have any significant impact on promastigote replication under normal culture conditions (Fig 3E).

Fig 3. Generation of chromosomal EPCT-null mutants using an episome-assisted approach.

Fig 3

(A-D) Genomic DNA samples from FV1 WT, EPCT+/- + pXNG4-EPCT (clone #2B), and epct¯ + pXNG4-EPCT (seven clones) parasites were digested with Aat II (A, B) or Kpn I+Avr II (C, D) and analyzed by Southern blot using radiolabeled probes for an upstream flanking sequence (A, B) or the open reading frame of EPCT (C, D). DNA loading controls with ethidium bromide staining for A and C were included in B and D, respectively. The scheme of Southern blot and expected DNA fragment sizes were shown in S3 Fig. (E) Promastigotes of WT, EPCT+/- (#2), WT + pXNG4-EPCT, EPCT+/− + pXNG4-EPCT (clone #2B), and epct¯ +pXNG4-EPCT (clone #2B-10) were cultivated at 27°C in complete M199 media and culture densities were determined daily using a hemocytometer. Error bars indicate standard deviations from three biological repeats.

EPCT is essential for L. major promastigotes

To evaluate the essentiality of EPCT, EPCT+/- +pXNG4-EPCT and epct¯+ pXNG4-EPCT promastigotes were cultivated in the presence or absence of ganciclovir (GCV). Because of the TK expression from pXNG4-EPCT, adding GCV would trigger premature termination of DNA synthesis [46]. Thus, in the presence of GCV, parasites would favor the elimination of pXNG4-EPCT (which can be tracked by monitoring GFP fluorescence level) during replication to avoid toxicity, if the episome is dispensable [46]. As shown in Fig 4A, after being cultivated in the presence of GCV for 14 consecutive passages, those chromosomal EPCT-null promastigotes still contained 60–74% of GFP-high cells, indicative of high pXNG4-EPCT retention levels after prolonged negative selection. In contrast, the pXNG4-EPCT plasmid was easily expelled from the EPCT+/- +pXNG4-EPCT parasites after 8 passages in GCV (their GFP level dropped to that of WT, Fig 4A and 4B), suggesting that the remaining chromosomal EPCT allele made the episome expendable. Without GCV, we detected a gradual loss of episome in the EPCT+/- +pXNG4-EPCT but not epct¯+ pXNG4-EPCT parasites (Fig 4A), again arguing that the episome is indispensable in those chromosomal-null mutants. As controls, EPCT+/- +pXNG4-EPCT and epct¯+ pXNG4-EPCT grown in the presence of nourseothricin (the positive selection) consistently retained 85–91% GFP-high cells (“+SAT” in Fig 4A and 4C).

Fig 4. EPCT is indispensable during the promastigote stage.

Fig 4

(A) Promastigotes were continuously cultivated in the presence or absence of ganciclovir (GCV) or nourseothricin (SAT) and passed every three days. Percentages of GFP-high cells were determined for every passage. Error bars represent standard deviations from three repeats (**: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001). (B-D) After 14 passages, WT (B) and epct¯+pXNG4-EPCT parasites grown in the presence of SAT (C) or GCV (D) were analyzed by flow cytometry to determine the percentages of GFP-high cells (indicated by R2 in the histograms). (E-F) Two clones were isolated from the GFP-low population in D by FACS, amplified in the absence of SAT and presence of GCV, and analyzed for GFP expression levels by flow cytometry (more details for the sorting were included in S5 Fig).

Our analysis showed that 25–38% of epct¯+ pXNG4-EPCT parasites became GFP-low after prolonged exposure to GCV (Fig 4A and 4D). To examine whether these GFP-low cells in epct¯+ pXNG4-EPCT could survive by themselves, they were separated from GFP-high cells by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and individual clones were isolated after serial dilution. As illustrated in S5 Fig, when single clones were expanded from the sorted GFP-low population in the presence of GCV and absence of nourseothricin, they quickly regained GFP fluorescence. After two passages, two such clones showed similar percentages of GFP-high cells (70–74%) as the population prior to sorting (Figs 4D–4F and S5). These data suggest that GFP-low cells still contained a low level of episome and would increase the episome level during proliferation after they were separated from GFP-high cells. Additionally, quantitative PCR (qPCR) analyses were performed on these clones using primers targeting the GFP region (to determine total plasmid copy number) and the L. major 28S rDNA (to determine total parasite number). Results revealed ~8 copies of pXNG4-EPCT plasmid per cell in the epct¯+ pXNG4-EPCT GCV-treated clones, whereas the EPCT+/- +pXNG4-EPCT clones isolated by the same process (GCV treatment ➔ GFP-low sorting ➔ serial dilution) contained <0.01 copy per cell (S6A Fig). We also sequenced the pXNG4-EPCT plasmid DNA from GCV-treated epct¯+ pXNG4-EPCT clones and did not find mutations in TK, GFP or EPCT. Finally, we found a significant growth delay in GCV-treated epct¯+ pXNG4-EPCT but not EPCT+/- +pXNG4-EPCT promastigotes in comparison to control cells (S6B Fig). This is consistent with the episome retention in epct¯+ pXNG4-EPCT which leads to GCV-induced cytotoxicity. Together, these findings demonstrate the essential nature of EPCT in L. major promastigotes.

EPCT expression is crucial for L. major amastigotes

To investigate if EPCT is required for the survival of intracellular amastigotes, we infected BALB/c mice in the footpad with stationary phase promastigotes. After infection, half of the mice received daily GCV treatment, and the other half received equivalent amount of PBS (control group) for 14 consecutive days as previously described [48]. No significant changes in mouse body weight or movement were detected from GCV treatment (S7A Fig). Mice infected by WT and EPCT+/- parasites exhibited equally rapid development of footpad lesions that correlated with robust parasite replication, indicating that one chromosomal copy of EPCT is sufficient for the mammalian stage (Fig 5A and 5B). By comparison, mice infected by EPCT+/- +pXNG4-EPCT or epct¯+ pXNG4-EPCT showed a 9-12-week delay in lesion development (Fig 5A), and the delay was consistent with the significantly reduced parasite growth as determined by limiting dilution assay and qPCR (Figs 5B and S7B). These results suggest that elevated EPCT expression from pXNG4-EPCT, a high copy number plasmid (Figs 3C and 5C), may be responsible for the delayed lesion progression and amastigote growth from EPCT+/- +pXNG4-EPCT and epct¯+ pXNG4-EPCT promastigotes (Figs 5 and S7). To test this hypothesis, we introduced pXNG4-EPCT into WT parasites and the resulting WT +pXNG4-EPCT cells showed similar infectivity in mice as EPCT+/- +pXNG4-EPCT or epct¯+ pXNG4-EPCT parasites (Fig 5), indicating that this plasmid can attenuate virulence in the WT background as well. In addition, the EPCT gene was cloned into a pGEM vector along with its 5’- and 3’-flanking sequences (~1 Kb each) and the resulting pGEM-EPCT was introduced into EPCT+/- parasites. Like cells with pXNG4-EPCT, these EPCT+/- + pGEM-EPCT parasites displayed significantly reduced virulence and growth in BALB/c mice (S8 Fig), proving that these defects were caused by EPCT overexpression and not restricted to the pXNG4 plasmid.

Fig 5. EPCT is indispensable during the amastigote stage.

Fig 5

BALB/c mice were infected in the footpad with stationary phase promastigotes and treated with GCV or PBS as described in Materials and Methods. (A) Sizes of footpad lesions for infected mice were measured weekly. (B) Parasite numbers in infected footpads were determined by limiting dilution assay at the indicated times. Data for WT and EPCT+/- amastigotes were not available after 8 weeks when those infected mice had reached the humane endpoint. (C) The average pXNG4-EPCT plasmid copy numbers in promastigotes and amastigotes (#/cell ± SDs) were determined by qPCR. Error bars represent standard deviations from three repeats (*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001).

While GCV treatment had little impact on infections caused by WT, EPCT+/-, or EPCT+/- +pXNG4-EPCT parasites, it caused an additional 3-4-week delay in lesion progression for epct¯+ pXNG4-EPCT (Fig 5A and 5B), suggesting that GCV-induced cytotoxicity is more significant in the chromosomal null mutants than others. To determine the pXNG4-EPCT copy number in amastigotes, we performed qPCR analyses on genomic DNA extracted from lesion-derived amastigotes. The average plasmid copy number per cell was revealed by dividing the total plasmid copy number with total parasite number. As shown in Fig 5C, EPCT+/- +pXNG4-EPCT amastigotes contained 8–13 copies per cell at week 4 post infection and that number gradually went down to 1.5–2.5 copies per cell by week 14–20; and GCV treatment caused reduction in plasmid copy number as expected. The reduction in plasmid copy number over time suggests that the episome is not required in EPCT+/- +pXNG4-EPCT amastigotes. Similarly, the episome copy number in WT +pXNG4-EPCT amastigotes decreased from 14–16 per cell at week 4 post infection to 2–4 per cell in week 14–20 and GCV treatment led to further reduction (Fig 5C). In comparison, epct¯+ pXNG4-EPCT amastigotes maintained 12–24 plasmid copies per cell throughout the course of infection even with GCV treatment (Fig 5C). Thus, these chromosomal EPCT-null amastigotes must retain a high episome level to survive which is consistent with their increased sensitivity to GCV (Fig 5A and 5B), Together, these data argue that EPCT is critically important for the survival of intracellular amastigotes.

In addition to plasmid copy number, we also examined EPCT transcript levels by reverse transcription-qPCR using α-tubulin transcript as the internal standard (Fig 6). For WT parasites, EPCT mRNA level went down ~60% from promastigotes to amastigotes, consistent with the relatively slow replication rate for amastigotes (Fig 6A). As expected, the presence of pXNG4-EPCT resulted in a 10-18-fold increase in EPCT mRNA levels (compared to WT cells) during the promastigote stage (Fig 6B). While the overexpression was less pronounced during the mammalian stage, we still observed a 2-8-fold increase in EPCT mRNA in epct¯+ pXNG4-EPCT amastigotes (week 14–20 post infection) in comparison to WT amastigotes (Fig 6C). For EPCT+/- +pXNG4-EPCT and epct¯+ pXNG4-EPCT amastigotes (week 14 post infection), EPCT transcript levels correlated with plasmid copy numbers (Figs 5C and 6C). The fact that GCV treatment increased EPCT levels in epct¯+ pXNG4-EPCT may be due to a combination of factors including the level of GCV being below the minimum effective concentration and amastigotes starting rapid replication by week 14. For WT +pXNG4-EPCT amastigotes (week 14 post infection), GCV treatment had opposite effects on EPCT transcription (upregulation) and plasmid copy number (downregulation), which may reflect increased transcription from the endogenous EPCT locus when the plasmid was depleted (Figs 5C and 6C).

Fig 6. Expression level of EPCT mRNA in promastigotes and amastigotes.

Fig 6

Total RNA was extracted from promastigotes (Pro) or amastigotes and the relative EPCT transcript levels were determined by qRT-PCR using the ΔΔCt method with the α-tubulin gene as the internal control. (A) WT promastigotes and WT amastigotes (6 weeks post infection). (B) Promastigotes grown in the absence (WT and EPCT+/-) or presence of SAT (WT+pXNG4-EPCT, EPCT+/- +pXNG4-EPCT and epct¯+pXNG4-EPCT). (C) Lesion derived amastigotes from mice treated with GCV or PBS (weeks 6 for WT and EPCT+/-, week 14–20 for EPCT overexpressors). Error bars represent standard deviation from three independent repeats (**: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001).

Changes in EPCT expression affects the syntheses of glycerophospholipids and GP63

To examine if EPCT expression level affects phospholipid composition in L. major, total lipids were extracted from stationary phase promastigotes and analyzed by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS). To detect PME and diacyl-PE, we used precursor ion scan of m/z 196 in the negative ion mode and added 14:0/14:0-PE as a standard for quantitation. As summarized in Fig 7A (details in S9 Fig), EPCT-overexpressing cells (WT +pXNG4-EPCT, EPCT+/- +pXNG4-EPCT and epct¯+ pXNG4-EPCT) had 30–50% less PME (p18:0/18:2- and p18:0/18:1-PE) relative to WT promastigotes. Meanwhile, the overall PME level in EPCT+/- was only slightly less than WT (due to reduced level of p18:0/18:1-PE), and there was no significant change in the abundance of diacyl-PE molecules (Figs 7A and S9). Similar ESI-MS analyses were performed to determine the levels of PC, phosphatidylinositol (PI), and IPC (the major sphingolipid in Leishmania). As summarized in Figs 7B and S10S12, EPCT half knockout (EPCT+/-) or over-expression did not affect the composition of PC or IPC. Furthermore, EPCT overexpressing cells had 20–30% less 18:0/18:1-PI, the most abundant type of PI in comparison to WT cells (Figs 7C and S11). We also detected a ~70% reduction in the level of a18:0/18:1-PI (an alkyl-acyl PI) in WT+ pXNG4-EPCT parasites (Fig 7C). Collectively, these lipidomic analyses suggest that proper regulation of EPCT expression is vital for the balanced synthesis of glycerophospholipids.

Fig 7. EPCT overexpression alters lipid composition.

Fig 7

Total lipids were extracted from promastigotes and analyzed by ESI-MS as described in Materials and Methods. Cellular levels of PE (including PME and diacyl PE), PC, and PI were determined through comparison to internal standards and summarized in A, B and C, respectively. Error bars represent standard deviation from 5 independent experiments (*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001). More details were included in S9S11 Figs).

Next, because PE and PI are involved in the biosynthesis of GP63 (a zinc-dependent, GPI-anchored metalloprotease) and lipophosphoglycan (LPG), respectively, we examined whether EPCT under- or over-expression could influence the production of these surface glycoconjugates. Interestingly, immunofluorescence microscopy revealed a 4-5-fold reduction of GP63 in EPCT+/-, WT +pXNG4-EPCT, and EPCT+/- +pXNG4-EPCT parasites and a nearly 8-fold reduction in epct¯ + pXNG4-EPCT (Fig 8A and 8C). On the other hand, the cellular levels of LPG (determined by western blot) were unaltered in EPCT mutant lines (Fig 8B and 8D). These findings argue that ECPT expression from its chromosomal locus is required for the proper synthesis of GP63.

Fig 8. EPCT overexpression leads to reduced level of GP63 but not LPG.

Fig 8

(A) WT, EPCT+/-, WT + pXNG4-EPCT, EPCT+/- + pXNG4-EPCT, and epct¯ + pXNG4-EPCT promastigotes were labeled with an anti-GP63 monoclonal antibody followed by an anti-mouse IgG-Texas Red antibody and DNA staining with Hoechst 33342. Scale bar: 10 μm. (B) Whole cell lysates from stationary phase promastigotes were analyzed by western blot using an anti-L. major LPG antibody (top) or anti-α-tubulin antibody (bottom). The relative abundances of GP63 (C) and LPG (D) were determined and normalized to WT levels as described in Materials and Methods. Error bars represent standard deviations from 3 independent repeats (***: p < 0.001).

EPCT overexpression affects stress response

To further explore how EPCT overexpression may compromise L. major virulence, we examined the response of mutants to starvation, acidic pH and heat stress as tolerance to these stress conditions are essential for parasite survival in the macrophage phagolysosome. Under normal conditions (complete M199 medium, pH7.4, 27°C), EPCT+/- and overexpressors proliferated at similar rates as WT promastigotes in log phase and exhibited good viability in stationary phase (Figs 3E and 9A). However, if cells were transferred to phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH7.4) to test starvation tolerance, 50–60% of EPCT overexpressing cells (WT+pXNG4-EPCT, EPCT+/- +pXNG4-EPCT and epct¯+ pXNG4-EPCT) died after 2–3 days in comparison to <20% death for WT parasites (Fig 9B). These overexpressors also showed a 24–48-hour growth delay if they were cultivated in a pH5.0 medium (Fig 9C). In addition, epct¯+ pXNG4-EPCT parasites were slightly more sensitive to acidic stress (pH 5.0, Fig 9D) and heat (37°C, Fig 9E and 9F) than WT in the stationary phase We did not detect any significant difference in mitochondrial superoxide level between WT and EPCT mutants (S13 Fig). Whether these defects are linked to the altered lipid contents in EPCT overexpressors remains to be determined. Regardless, sensitivity to stress conditions likely contributes to their lack of virulence.

Fig 9. EPCT overexpression leads to heightened sensitivity to acidic pH and starvation conditions.

Fig 9

(A-B) Promastigotes were cultivated in regular M199 media (pH 7.4) at 27°C until reaching stationary phase. Cells were then kept in M199 media (A) or transferred into phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and cell viability was examined using flow cytometry ((B). (C-D) Promastigotes were cultivated in an acidic M199 medium (pH5.0). Cell growth over time was determined by hemocytometer counting (C) and cell viability during stationary phase was monitored by flow cytometry (D). (E-F) Day 1 stationary phase promastigotes cultivated in regular M199 media (pH 7.4) were incubated at 27°C (E) or 37°C (F). Percentages of dead cells were determined by flow cytometry after propidium iodide staining (A, B, D-F). Error bars represent standard deviations from 3–4 independent experiments (*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001).

Discussion

Using a complementing episome assisted knockout approach coupled with negative selection, we demonstrate that EPCT is indispensable throughout the life cycle in L. major. The same method was applied to verify the essentiality of several genes in Leishmania [4648]. The fact that EPCT is essential in both promastigotes and amastigotes is in sharp contrast to cholinephosphate cytidylyltransferase (CPCT) which catalyzes the equivalent step in the choline branch of the Kennedy pathway by combining choline phosphate and CTP into CDP-choline (Fig 1). L. major CPCT-null mutants (cpct¯) cannot incorporate choline into PC but contain similar levels of PC as WT parasites [49]. Loss of CPCT has no impact on promastigote growth in culture or their virulence in mice [49]. A similar study on CEPT which is directly responsible for the generation of diacyl-PE and PC revealed that this enzyme is only required for the promastigote but not amastigote stage [18]. These findings indicate that intracellular amastigotes can survive and proliferate without de novo PC synthesis by relying on the uptake/remodeling of host lipids.

Like with CEPT, chromosomal null mutants for EPCT cannot lose the complementing pXNG4-EPCT episome in culture, suggesting that de novo PE synthesis is required for the fast-replicating promastigotes (Fig 4). When the GFP-low cells were separated from GCV-treated epct¯+ pXNG4-EPCT promastigotes by FACS, they quickly regained GFP expression, suggesting that these cells can only survive and proliferate in the presence of GFP-high cells (S5 Fig). Leishmania parasites are known to produce and exchange extracellular vesicles among individual cells [50] which may contribute to the survival of epct¯+ pXNG4-EPCT parasites after GCV treatment.

The fact that EPCT is indispensable for amastigotes is intriguing, as amastigotes can acquire enough PC, which is far more abundant than PE [18]. One possibility is that the PE scavenging pathway, either direct uptake or remodeling of host lipids, is insufficient and amastigotes need certain level of de novo synthesis to meet the demand for PE. Alternatively, because of its central position in the Kennedy pathway (Fig 1), a loss of EPCT will not only abolish the de novo synthesis of PME and diacyl-PE, but also negatively affect the production of PC (from PE N-methylation) and PS (from PE interconversion). In comparison to EPT, CPCT and CEPT, disruption of EPCT would result in a more pleiotropic effect on the synthesis of multiple classes of glycerophospholipids (Fig 1).

We observed a significant virulence attenuation from EPCT overexpression as parasites with pXNG4-ECPT or pGEM-EPCT showed delayed lesion progression and cell replication in mice (Figs 5 and S8). Such defects were not found with the episomal overexpression EPT, CPCT, CEPT, or FPPS (an essential enzyme required for sterol synthesis) [14,18,48,49]. In mammalian cells, endogenous EPCT is reported to have a bimodal distribution between the cytosol and smooth endoplasmic reticulum (ER) [51]. EPCT generates CDP-EtN for EPT and CEPT to synthesize PME and diacyl-PE, respectively (Figs 1 and 2). Both EPT and CEPT are localized in the ER [14,18]. Our results indicate that EPCT overexpression caused reduction in PME but had little effect on diacyl-PE or PC (Figs 7, S9 and S10). Perhaps EPCT overexpression (mainly in the cytosol) led to increased production of CDP-EtN in cytosol but not ER which reduced PE synthesis. Alternatively, the elevated level of CDP-EtN may cause substrate inhibition when substrate concentrations exceed the optimum level for certain enzymes which hinders product release [52]. We did not detect any obvious alteration in cell volume/shape or compensatory changes in the lipid composition of EPCT over-expressors based on our lipidomic analysis of PE, PC, PI and IPC. Effects of EPCT overexpression on neutral lipids (e.g., sterols, DAG and TAG) remain to be determined.

It is not clear whether the altered PME synthesis in EPCT overexpressing cells is responsible for their heightened sensitivity to starvation or acidic pH, although these defects likely contribute to the virulence attenuation in mice. Our previous report on L. major ept¯ mutants indicate that while these mutants are largely devoid of PME, they did not exhibit the same stress response defects as EPCT overexpressing cells [14]. It is possible that the increased cytosolic concentration of CDP-EtN, coupled with the depletion of EtN-P and CTP, causes cytotoxicity when parasite encounter starvation or acidic stress. Another possibility is that reduced PME synthesis compromised macroautophagy (a process required the conjugation of PE to ATG8 [9]) in EPCT overexpressing cells, resulting in hypersensitivity to starvation. We did not detect significant changes in mitochondrial superoxide production from EPCT under- or over-expression, suggesting that mitochondrial PE synthesis is not affected (S13 Fig).

Consistent with the detrimental effect of EPCT overexpression on amastigote growth, we found a steady decline of pXNG4-EPCT copy number in WT +pXNG4-EPCT and EPCT+/- +pXNG4-EPCT amastigotes (Fig 5C). GCV treatment of mice caused further reduction in plasmid level as expected (Fig 5C). Curiously, neither EPCT+/- +pXNG4-EPCT amastigotes nor WT +pXNG4-EPCT amastigotes could completely lose the episome like EPCT+/- +pXNG4-EPCT promastigotes in culture after GCV treatment (Figs 4A and 5C). Our previous studies on farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase (FPPS) and CEPT have demonstrated that heterozygous mutants of those genes lost most of their respective episome (<0.2 copy per cell for FPPS+/− +pXNG4-FPPS and CEPT+/− +pXNG4-CEPT) within 6 weeks post infection [18,48]. It is possible that the slow replication rates of EPCT+/- +pXNG4-EPCT and WT +pXNG4-EPCT amastigotes prevented complete plasmid loss.

For epct¯+ pXNG4-EPCT amastigotes, they retained 12–24 plasmids per cell throughout the course of infection, despite the cytotoxic effects from GCV and EPCT overexpression (Fig 5C). We also detected elevated EPCT transcript from epct¯+ pXNG4-EPCT amastigotes isolated from GCV-treated mice (Fig 6C). These findings suggest that the need for EPCT outweighs the negative impacts from GCV and EPCT overexpression for L. major during the mammalian stage. However, it is important to remember that GCV treatment of mice only lasted for two weeks, and the level of GCV might be below the minimum effective concentration in the later stage of infection. In addition, plasmid copy number and EPCT transcript level may not fully reflect the EPCT protein level.

While the alteration of EPCT expression had little impact on the cellular level of lipophosphoglycan (LPG), it did significantly reduce the expression of GP63, a zinc-dependent metalloprotease that plays pivotal role Leishmania infection through proteolytic cleavage of host complement proteins and subversion of macrophage signaling [5356]. Synthesis of GP63 requires PE to serve as a donor to generate the EtN-P linkage between protein and GPI-anchor [7,57]. It is not known whether a specific subset of PE (PME or di-acyl PE) is preferentially used in GP63 synthesis. As illustrated in Fig 8A and 8C, EPCT+/- parasites contained only 10–15% of WT-level GP63, and the episomal expression of EPCT did not rescue this defect. These results suggest that EPCT must be expressed from its endogenous locus to fully support GP63 synthesis, raising the possibility that endogenously expressed EPCT is modified or compartmentalized differently from episomally expressed EPCT, as previously reported for other leishmanial proteins [58].

In summary, our study establishes EPCT as the most important enzyme in the Kennedy pathway. It is crucial for L. major survival during the promastigote and amastigote stages. Overexpression of EPCT alters lipid homeostasis and stress response, leading to severely attenuated virulence. Future studies will investigate how intracellular amastigotes balance de novo synthesis with scavenging to optimize their long-term survival and evaluate the potential of EPCT as a new anti-Leishmania target.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

All procedures involving live mice were performed as per approved protocol by the Animal Care and Use Committee at Texas Tech University (PHS Approved Animal Welfare Assurance No A3629-01).

Materials

Lipid standards for mass spectrometry studies including 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (14:0/14:0-PE), 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (14:0/14:0-PC), and 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoinositol (16:0/16:0-PI) were purchased from Avanti Polar Lipids (Alabaster, AL). For the EPCT activity assay, phosphoryl ethanolamine [1,2-14C] (50–60 mCi/mmol) or [14-C] EtN-P was purchased from American Radiolabeled Chemicals (St Louis, MO). All other reagents were purchased from ThermoFisher Scientific or Sigma Aldrich Inc unless otherwise specified.

Leishmania culture and genetic manipulations

Leishmania major strain FV1 (MHOM/IL/81/Friedlin) promastigotes were cultivated at 27°C in a complete M199 medium (M199 with 10% heat inactivated fetal bovine serum and other supplements, pH 7.4) [59]. To monitor growth, culture densities were measured daily by hemocytometer counting. Log phase promastigotes refer to replicative parasites at densities <1.0 x 107 cells/ml, and stationary phase promastigotes refer to non-replicative parasites >2.0 x 107 cells/ml.

To delete chromosomal EPCT alleles, the upstream and downstream flanking sequences (~1 Kb each) of EPCT were amplified by PCR and cloned in the pUC18 vector. Genes conferring resistance to blasticidin (BSD) and puromycin (PAC) were then cloned between the upstream and downstream flanking sequences to generate pUC18-KO-EPCT:BSD and pUC18-KO-EPCT:PAC, respectively. To generate the EPCT+/- heterozygotes (ΔEPCT::BSD/EPCT), wild type (WT) L. major promastigotes were transfected with linearized BSD knockout fragment (derived from pUC18-KO-EPCT:BSD) by electroporation and transfectants showing resistance to blasticidin were selected and later confirmed to be EPCT+/- by Southern blot as previously described [18]. To delete the second chromosomal allele of EPCT, we used an episome assisted approach as previously described [46]. First, the EPCT open reading frame (ORF) was cloned into the pXNG4 vector to generate pXNG4-EPCT and the resulting plasmid was introduced into EPCT+/- parasites. The resulting EPCT+/- +pXNG4-EPCT cell lines were then transfected with linearized PAC knockout fragment (derived from pUC18-KO-EPCT:PAC) and selected with 15 μg/ml of blasticidin, 15 μg/ml of puromycin and 150 μg/ml of nourseothricin. The resulting EPCT chromosomal null mutants with pXNG4-EPCT (ΔEPCT::BSD/ΔEPCT::PAC + pXNG4-EPCT or epct¯+ pXNG4-EPCT) were validated by Southern blot as described in Figs 3, S3 and S4. For EPCT activity assay and localization studies, the EPCT ORF was into the pXG vector or pXG-GFP’ vector to generate pXG-EPCT or pXG-GFP-EPCT respectively, followed by their introduction into WT L. major promastigotes by electroporation. Finally, a pGEM-5’-Phleo-DST IR-EPCT-3’ construct was generated by cloning the EPCT ORF along with its upstream- and downstream flanking sequences (~1 Kb each) into a pGEM vector [60]. The resulting plasmid was introduced into EPCT+/- to drive EPCT overexpression in the presence of its flanking sequences.

EPCT activity assay

EPCT assay was adopted based on a previously protocol [35]. Log phase promastigotes of WT, WT + pXG-EPCT (WT+EPCT), and WT + pXG-GFP-EPCT (WT+GFP-EPCT) were resuspended in a lysis buffer based phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) with 5 mM MgCl2, 0.1% Triton X-100, 5 mM DTT, and 1 X protease inhibitor cocktail at 4 x 108 cells/ml. Leishmania lysate was incubated with 1 μCi of [14-C] EtN-P in a reaction buffer (100 mM Tris pH 7.5, 10 mM MgCl2, and 5 mM CTP) at room temperature for 20 min, boiled at 100°C for 5 min to stop the reaction, and loaded directly on a Silica gel 60 TLC plate (10 μl each). TLC was developed in 100% ethanol:0.5% NaCl:25% ammonium hydroxide (10:10:1, v/v) and signals were detected via autoradiography at -80°C. Ratios of [14-C] CDP-EtN]/[14-C] EtN-P were determined using Adobe Photoshop. Mouse liver homogenate (with similar protein concentration as Leishmania lysate) was used as a positive control whereas boiled Leishmania lysate and mouse liver homogenate were included as negative controls. To determine the mobility of EPCT substrate (EtN-P) and product (CDP-EtN), non-radiolabeled EtN-P and CDP-EtN (40 nmol each) were loaded onto a Silica gel 60 TLC plate and processed with the same solvent as described above, followed by 0.2% ninhydrin spray.

Sub-cellular fractionation

Promastigotes were fractionated following a protocol adapted from T. cruzi work [61]. Briefly, mid-log cells were harvested by centrifugation and washed in PBS. Cells were resuspended in a lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% v/v Tween-20, 2 x protease inhibitor) at 2 x 108 cells/ml. After 15 min incubation on ice (vortex every 2 min), cell lysates were cleared (1000g, 10 min, 4°C) and subjected to sequential centrifugation at 10,000g (10 min, 4°C) and then 100,000g (60 min, 4°C) to isolate the cytosolic fraction. Pellets from 10,000g centrifugation (large granules) and 100,000g centrifugation (microsomal fraction) were resuspended in lysis buffer to the same volume as that of the cytosolic fraction. Western blot was performed as described below.

Fluorescence microscopy and western blot

An Olympus BX51 Upright Epifluorescence Microscope equipped with a digital camera was used to visualize the localization of GFP-EPCT and GP63 as previously described [14]. For GFP-EPCT, WT + pXG-GFP-EPCT promastigotes were attached to poly-L-lysine coated coverslips and fixed with 3.7% paraformaldehyde prior to visualization. GP63 staining of unpermeabilized parasites was performed using an anti-GP63 monoclonal antibody (#96/126, 1:500, Abcam Inc.) at ambient temperature for 30 min, followed by washing and incubation with a goat-anti-mouse-IgG-Texas Red antibody (1:500) for 30 min. DNA staining was performed using Hoechst 33342 (2.5 μg/ml) for 10 min. All images were acquired using the same exposure times (GFP: 60 ms, DNA: 40 ms, DIC: 20 ms) and processed with the same settings in Adobe Photoshop. Because the anti-GP63 monoclonal antibody (#96/126) does not recognized denatured GP63 on western blot, we determined the cellular level of GP63 by dividing the integrated density of GP63 fluorescence (minus background) with the integrated density of Hoechst (minus background). For each cell type, 200 cells were analyzed, and the average of GP63/Hoechst was determined and normalized to WT (as 1.0).

To examine the cellular level of lipophosphoglycan (LPG) and GFP-EPCT, promastigote lysates were heated in SDS sample buffer at 65°C for 5 min and resolved by SDS-PAGE. After transfer to PVDF membrane, blots were probed with mouse anti-LPG monoclonal antibody WIC79.3 (1:1000) [62] followed by goat anti-mouse IgG conjugated with HRP (1:2000). GFP-EPCT was detected using a rabbit anti-GFP antibody (Abcam Inc., 1:2000) followed by goat anti-rabbit IgG-HRP (1:2000). Antibody to alpha-tubulin was used as the loading control. For sub-cellular fractions, 6 μg of cytosolic fraction, large granules, and microsomal fraction were probed with anti-GFP, -LPG or -HSP83 antibodies.

Promastigote essentiality assay

EPCT+/- +pXNG4-EPCT and epct¯+ pXNG4-EPCT promastigotes were inoculated in complete M199 media at 1.0 x 105 cells/ml in the presence or absence of 50 μg/ml of GCV (the negative selection agent) or 150 μg/ml of nourseothricin (the positive selection agent). Every three days, cells were reinoculated into fresh media with the same negative or positive selection agents and percentages of GFP-high cells for each passage were determined by flow cytometry using an Attune NxT Acoustic Flow Cytometer. After 14 passages, GFP-low cells were isolated from EPCT+/- +pXNG4-EPCT and epct¯+ pXNG4-EPCT by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). Individual clones were then isolated via serial dilution in 96-well plates and expanded in the presence of GCV and absence of nourseothricin. The GFP levels and pXNG4-EPCT plasmid copy numbers of selected clones were determined by flow cytometry and qPCR, respectively.

Mouse footpad infection and in vivo GCV treatment

Female BALB/c mice (7–8 weeks old) were purchased from Charles River Laboratories International (Wilmington, MA). To determine whether EPCT is required during the intracellular amastigote stage, day 3 stationary phase promastigotes were injected into the left hind footpad of BALB/c mice (1.0 x 106 cells/mouse, 10 mice per group). For each group, starting from day one post infection, one half of the mice received GCV at 7.5 mg/kg/day for 14 consecutive days (0.5 ml each, intraperitoneal injection), while the other half (control group) received equivalent volume of sterile PBS. Footpad lesions were measured weekly using a Vernier caliper after anesthetization with isoflurane (air flow rate: 0.3–0.5 ml/hour). Mice were euthanized through controlled flow of CO2 asphyxiation when lesions reached 2.5 mm (humane endpoint) or upon the onset of secondary infections. Parasite numbers in infected footpads were determined by limiting dilution assay [63] and qPCR as described below.

Quantitative PCR (qPCR) analysis

To determine parasite loads in infected footpads, genomic DNA was extracted from footpad homogenate and qPCR reactions were run in triplicates using primers targeting the 28S rRNA gene of L. major [18]. Cycle threshold (Ct) values were determined from melt curve analysis. A standard curve of Ct values was generated using serially diluted genomic DNA samples from L. major promastigotes (from 0.1 cell/reaction to 105 cells/reaction) and Ct values >30 were considered negative. Parasite numbers in footpad samples were calculated from their Ct values using the standard curve. Control reactions included sterile water and DNA extracted from uninfected mouse liver.

To determine pXNG4-EPCT plasmid levels in promastigotes and lesion-derived amastigotes, a similar standard curve was generated using serially diluting pXNG4-EPCT plasmid DNA (from 0.1 copy/reaction to 105 copies/reaction) and primers targeting the GFP region. qPCR was performed with the same set of primers on DNA samples and the average plasmid copy number per cell was determined by dividing total plasmid copy number with total parasite number based on Ct values.

To determine EPCT transcript levels, total RNA was extracted from promastigotes or lesion-derived amastigotes and converted into cDNA using a high-capacity reverse transcription kit (Bio-Rad), followed by qPCR using primers targeting EPCT or α-tubulin coding sequences. The relative expression level of EPCT was normalized to that of α-tubulin using the 2−ΔΔ(Ct) method [64]. Control reactions were carried out without leishmanial RNA and without reverse transcriptase.

Lipid extraction and mass spectrometric analyses

Total lipids from stationary phase promastigotes (1.0 x 108 cells/sample) were extracted using the Bligh & Dyer method [65]. Commercial non-indigenous lipid standards were added to cell lysates as internal standards at the time of lipid extraction (1.0 x 108 molecules/cell for 14:0/14:0-PE, 5.0 x107 molecules/cell for 14:0/14:0-PC, and 1.0 x 108 molecules/cell for 16:0/16:0-PI). These lipid standards are absent from L. major promastigotes. Determination of lipid families by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) was carried out by a Thermo Vantage TSQ instrument applying precursor ion scan of m/z 196 for PE, precursor ion scan of m/z 241 for PI and IPC in the negative-ion mode, and precursor ion scan of m/z 184 for PC in the positive-ion mode [66]. Individual lipid species and their structures were also confirmed by high resolution mass spectrometry performed on a Thermo LTQ Obitrap Velos with a resolution of 100,000 (at m/z 400). All lipidomic analyses were performed five times.

Leishmania stress response assays and determination of mitochondrial ROS level

For heat tolerance, L. major promastigotes grown in complete M199 media were incubated at either 27°C or 37°C. To test their sensitivity to acidic pH, promastigotes were transferred to a pH5.0 medium (same as the complete M199 medium except that the pH was adjusted to 5.0 using hydrochloric acid). For starvation response, promastigotes were transferred to PBS (pH 7.4). Cell viability was determined at the indicated times by flow cytometry after staining with 5 μg/ml of propidium iodide. Parasite growth was monitored by cell counting using a hemocytometer.

Mitochondrial superoxide accumulation was determined as described previously [34]. Briefly, log phase promastigotes were transferred to PBS (pH 7.4) and stained with 5 μM of MitoSox Red. After 25 min incubation at 27°C, the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) for each sample was measured by flow cytometry.

Statistical analysis

Unless otherwise specified, experiments were repeated three to five times. Symbols or bars represent averaged values and error bars represent standard deviations. Differences between groups were assessed by one-way ANOVA (for three or more groups) using the Sigmaplot 13.0 software (Systat Software Inc, San Jose, CA) or student t test (for two groups). P values were grouped in all figures (***: p < 0.001, **: p < 0.01, *: p < 0.05).

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Alignment of EPCT amino acid sequences from Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Sc, Genbank: P33412), Plasmodium falciparum (Pf, Plasmodb: PfDd2_130053500), Leishmania major (Lm, Tritrypdb: LmjF.32.0890), Arabidopsis thaliana (At, TAIR: AT2G38670.1), and Homo sapiens (Hs, Genbank: Q99447) using Clustal Omega.

Asterisks (*): fully conserved residues; colons (:) highly similar residues; periods (.): moderately similar residues. Color code for amino acids: red-nonpolar; green-polar; blue-acidic; purple-basic.

(PDF)

S2 Fig. Detection of EPCT activity with thin layer chromatography (TLC).

(A) EtN-P or CDP-EtN (40 nmol each) are resolved by TLC as described in Materials and Methods. The plate was dried and sprayed with 0.2% ninhydrin to show the positions of EtN-P and CDP-EtN. (B) Mouse liver lysates (boiled and not boiled, two repeats each) were incubated with [14C]-EtN-P at room temperature, followed by TLC analysis and signals were detected by autoradiography.

(PDF)

S3 Fig. Chromosomal EPCT-null mutants cannot be generated without a complementing episome.

Genomic DNA samples from L. major FV1 WT, LV39 WT, EPCT+/- (#1 and #2), and putative epct¯ (#1D, #1E, and #1F) parasites were digested by Hind III + Bam HI followed by Southern blot analyses using radiolabeled probes for an upstream flanking sequence (5’ probe: A and C) and the open reading frame of EPCT (ORF probe: B and D). The approximate recognition sites of Hind III and Bam HI and expected DNA fragment sizes are indicated in E.

(PDF)

S4 Fig. Scheme of the Southern blot in Fig 3.

Expected DNA fragment sizes for using the 5’ probe (A-B) or ORF probe of EPCT (C-D) are indicated. TK: thymidine kinase, GFP: green fluorescent protein, SAT: nourseothricin resistance gene.

(PDF)

S5 Fig. Attempts to isolate GFP-low cells from epct¯+pXNG4-EPCT by FACS.

(A) Epct¯+pXNG4-EPCT promastigotes were cultivated in the presence of GCV and absence of SAT for 14 passages as indicated in Fig 4D. GFP-low population (B) was separated from GFP-high population (C) by FACS. Single clones were then isolated from the GFP-low population (B) via serial dilution followed by two consecutive rounds of expansion in the presence of GCV and absence of SAT (D and E represent the first and second round of expansion respectively). GFP expression levels in A-E were analyzed by flow cytometry.

(PDF)

S6 Fig. Chromosomal EPCT-null promastigotes cannot lose the pXNG4-EPCT episome.

(A) EPCT+/- + pXNG4-EPCT and epct¯ + pXNG4-EPCT promastigotes were cultivated in the presence of SAT or GCV for 14 passages (as pools) and individual clones were isolated via FACS followed by serial dilution as described in Materials and Methods. Plasmid copy number numbers (average ± SDs) were determined by qPCR. (B) Promastigotes were cultivated at 27°C in complete M199 media and culture densities were determined daily using a hemocytometer. Error bars indicate standard deviations from three biological repeats (*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01).

(PDF)

S7 Fig. EPCT overexpression leads to reduced growth in BALB/c mice.

Following footpad infection, mice were treated with GCV or PBS and euthanized at the indicated timepoints. (A) Mouse body weights were measured at day 0–21 post infection. (B) Genomic DNA samples were prepared from lesion-derived amastigotes and parasite loads were determined by qPCR using primers targeting the L. major 28S rDNA gene (*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001).

(PDF)

S8 Fig. EPCT overexpression leads to attenuated virulence in BALB/c mice.

Stationary phase promastigotes were injected into the footpad of BALB/c mice as described in Materials and Methods. Footpad lesion sizes were measured using a Vernier caliper (A) and parasite loads were determined by qPCR (B). **: p < 0.01.

(PDF)

S9 Fig. EPCT overexpression leads to reduced levels of PME.

Total lipids were extracted from log phase promastigotes and analyzed by ESI-MS in the negative ion mode as described in Materials and Methods. The 14:0/14:0-PE (m/z 634.5) was added as an internal standard. Representative tandem mass spectra obtained from precursor ion scan of m/z 196 specifically monitoring PME and diacyl-PE species were shown for WT, EPCT+/-, WT + pXNG4-EPCT, EPCT+/- + pXNG4-EPCT, and epct¯ + pXNG4-EPCT. Major PME species such as p18:0/18:2-PE (m/z 726.5) and p18:0/18:1-PE (m/z 728.5) were indicated.

(PDF)

S10 Fig. EPCT overexpression does not affect the synthesis of PC.

Total lipids were extracted from log phase promastigotes and analyzed by ESI-MS in the positive ion mode as described in Materials and Methods. The 14:0/14:0-PC (m/z 678.5) was added as an internal standard. Representative tandem mass spectra obtained from precursor ion scan of m/z 184 specifically monitoring PC and sphingomyelin species were shown for WT, EPCT+/-, WT + pXNG4-EPCT, EPCT+/- + pXNG4-EPCT, and epct¯ + pXNG4-EPCT. Major PC species such as 18:2/18:2-PC (m/z 782.6) and 18:2/22:6-PC (m/z 830.6) were illustrated.

(PDF)

S11 Fig. EPCT overexpression leads to reduced levels of PI.

Total lipids were extracted from log phase promastigotes and analyzed by ESI-MS in the negative ion mode as described in Materials and Methods. The 16:0/16:0-PI (m/z: 809.6) was added as an internal standard. Representative tandem mass spectra obtained from precursor ion scan of m/z 241 (specific for PI) were shown for WT, EPCT+/-, WT + pXNG4-EPCT, EPCT+/- + pXNG4-EPCT, and epct¯ + pXNG4-EPCT. Major PI species were indicated.

(PDF)

S12 Fig. EPCT overexpression does not affect the cellular levels of IPC.

Total lipids were extracted from stationary phase promastigotes and analyzed by ESI/MS in the negative ion mode using both total ion current scan and precursor ion scan of m/z 241. Error bars represent standard deviations from 4 independent experiments.

(PDF)

S13 Fig. EPCT overexpression does not affect mitochondrial ROS production.

Log phase promastigotes were cultivated in complete M199 medium (A, C) or transferred to PBS (B, D) and labeled with MitoSox Red for 25 min at ambient temperature. Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) for MitoSox Red (A, B) and percentages of dead cells (C, D) were determined by flow cytometry at the indicated timepoints. Cell growth rates in M199 or PBS were determined by hemocytometer counting (E). Error bars represent standard deviations from three independent experiments.

(PDF)

S1 Table. List of oligonucleotides used in this study.

Sequences in lowercase represent restriction enzyme sites.

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

Rabbit antibody against Leishmania HSP83 was a kind gift from Dr. Dan Zilberstein (Technion Israel Institute of Science).

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (R15AI156746 and R01AI139198 to KZ, P41-GM103422, P60-DK20579 and P30-DK56341 to FH and the Biomedical Mass Spectrometry Resource at Washington University in St. Louis) and Howard Hughes Medical Institute (Undergraduate Science Education Program to MP). The funders have no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Alvar J, Velez ID, Bern C, Herrero M, Desjeux P, Cano J, et al. Leishmaniasis worldwide and global estimates of its incidence. PloS one. 2012;7(5):e35671. Epub 2012/06/14. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035671 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3365071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.DALYs GBD, Collaborators H, Murray CJ, Barber RM, Foreman KJ, Abbasoglu Ozgoren A, et al. Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 306 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 188 countries, 1990–2013: quantifying the epidemiological transition. Lancet. 2015;386(10009):2145–91. Epub 20150828. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61340-X ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4673910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Croft SL, Sundar S, Fairlamb AH. Drug resistance in leishmaniasis. Clinical microbiology reviews. 2006;19(1):111–26. doi: 10.1128/CMR.19.1.111-126.2006 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Uliana SRB, Trinconi CT, Coelho AC. Chemotherapy of leishmaniasis: present challenges. Parasitology. 2018;145(4):464–80. Epub 20170120. doi: 10.1017/S0031182016002523 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Exton JH. Phosphatidylcholine breakdown and signal transduction. Biochimica et biophysica acta. 1994;1212(1):26–42. Epub 1994/04/14. doi: 10.1016/0005-2760(94)90186-4 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Furse S, de Kroon AI. Phosphatidylcholine’s functions beyond that of a membrane brick. Mol Membr Biol. 2015;32(4):117–9. Epub 20150825. doi: 10.3109/09687688.2015.1066894 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Menon AK, Eppinger M, Mayor S, Schwarz RT. Phosphatidylethanolamine is the donor of the terminal phosphoethanolamine group in trypanosome glycosylphosphatidylinositols. EMBO J. 1993;12(5):1907–14. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb05839.x . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Besteiro S, Williams RA, Morrison LS, Coombs GH, Mottram JC. Endosome sorting and autophagy are essential for differentiation and virulence of Leishmania major. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2006;281(16):11384–96. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M512307200 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Williams RA, Smith TK, Cull B, Mottram JC, Coombs GH. ATG5 is essential for ATG8-dependent autophagy and mitochondrial homeostasis in Leishmania major. PLoS pathogens. 2012;8(5):e1002695. Epub 2012/05/23. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002695 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3355087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Signorell A, Jelk J, Rauch M, Butikofer P. Phosphatidylethanolamine is the precursor of the ethanolamine phosphoglycerol moiety bound to eukaryotic elongation factor 1A. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2008;283(29):20320–9. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M802430200 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kennedy EP. The synthesis of cytidine diphosphate choline, cytidine diphosphate ethanolamine, and related compounds. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1956;222(1):185–91. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zhang K, Pompey JM, Hsu FF, Key P, Bandhuvula P, Saba JD, et al. Redirection of sphingolipid metabolism toward de novo synthesis of ethanolamine in Leishmania. EMBO J. 2007;26(4):1094–104. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601565 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sundler R. Ethanolaminephosphate cytidylyltransferase. Purification and characterization of the enzyme from rat liver. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1975;250(22):8585–90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pawlowic MC, Hsu FF, Moitra S, Biyani N, Zhang K. Plasmenylethanolamine synthesis in Leishmania major. Molecular microbiology. 2016;101(2):238–49. Epub 2016/04/12. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13387 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4935589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ford DA. Separate myocardial ethanolamine phosphotransferase activities responsible for plasmenylethanolamine and phosphatidylethanolamine synthesis. Journal of lipid research. 2003;44(3):554–9. Epub 2003/02/04. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M200426-JLR200 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Signorell A, Rauch M, Jelk J, Ferguson MA, Butikofer P. Phosphatidylethanolamine in Trypanosoma brucei is organized in two separate pools and is synthesized exclusively by the Kennedy pathway. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2008;283(35):23636–44. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M803600200 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Henneberry AL, McMaster CR. Cloning and expression of a human choline/ethanolaminephosphotransferase: synthesis of phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylethanolamine. The Biochemical journal. 1999;339 (Pt 2):291–8. Epub 1999/04/07. ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1220157. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Moitra S, Basu S, Pawlowic M, Hsu FF, Zhang K. De Novo Synthesis of Phosphatidylcholine Is Essential for the Promastigote But Not Amastigote Stage in Leishmania major. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology. 2021;11:647870. Epub 20210312. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.647870 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7996062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Vance JE. Phosphatidylserine and phosphatidylethanolamine in mammalian cells: two metabolically related aminophospholipids. Journal of lipid research. 2008;49(7):1377–87. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R700020-JLR200 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Vance DE. Phospholipid methylation in mammals: from biochemistry to physiological function. Biochimica et biophysica acta. 2014;1838(6):1477–87. Epub 20131101. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2013.10.018 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bibis SS, Dahlstrom K, Zhu T, Zufferey R. Characterization of Leishmania major phosphatidylethanolamine methyltransferases LmjPEM1 and LmjPEM2 and their inhibition by choline analogs. Molecular and biochemical parasitology. 2014;196(2):90–9. Epub 2014/09/02. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2014.08.005 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4252796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Parodi-Talice A, Araujo JM, Torres C, Perez-Victoria JM, Gamarro F, Castanys S. The overexpression of a new ABC transporter in Leishmania is related to phospholipid trafficking and reduced infectivity. Biochimica et biophysica acta. 2003;1612(2):195–207. doi: 10.1016/s0005-2736(03)00131-7 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Castanys-Munoz E, Alder-Baerens N, Pomorski T, Gamarro F, Castanys S. A novel ATP-binding cassette transporter from Leishmania is involved in transport of phosphatidylcholine analogues and resistance to alkyl-phospholipids. Molecular microbiology. 2007;64(5):1141–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05653.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zhang K. Balancing de novo synthesis and salvage of lipids by Leishmania amastigotes. Current opinion in microbiology. 2021;63:98–103. Epub 20210723. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2021.07.004 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8463422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhang K, Beverley SM. Phospholipid and sphingolipid metabolism in Leishmania. Molecular and biochemical parasitology. 2010;170(2):55–64. PMCID: 2815228. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2009.12.004 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhang K, Hsu FF. Shotgun Lipidomic Analysis of Leishmania Cells. Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2306:215–25. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1410-5_14 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Gossage SM, Rogers ME, Bates PA. Two separate growth phases during the development of Leishmania in sand flies: implications for understanding the life cycle. International journal for parasitology. 2003;33(10):1027–34. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7519(03)00142-5 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Inbar E, Akopyants NS, Charmoy M, Romano A, Lawyer P, Elnaiem DE, et al. The mating competence of geographically diverse Leishmania major strains in their natural and unnatural sand fly vectors. PLoS genetics. 2013;9(7):e1003672. Epub 2013/08/13. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003672 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3723561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Saunders EC, Ng WW, Kloehn J, Chambers JM, Ng M, McConville MJ. Induction of a stringent metabolic response in intracellular stages of Leishmania mexicana leads to increased dependence on mitochondrial metabolism. PLoS pathogens. 2014;10(1):e1003888. Epub 2014/01/28. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003888 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3900632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mandell MA, Beverley SM. Continual renewal and replication of persistent Leishmania major parasites in concomitantly immune hosts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2017;114(5):E801–E10. Epub 2017/01/18. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1619265114 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5293024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kuhlmann FM, Key PN, Hickerson SM, Turk J, Hsu FF, Beverley SM. Inositol phosphorylceramide synthase null Leishmania are viable and virulent in animal infections where salvage of host sphingomyelin predominates. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2022;298(11):102522. Epub 20220923. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2022.102522 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9637897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zhang K, Hsu FF, Scott DA, Docampo R, Turk J, Beverley SM. Leishmania salvage and remodelling of host sphingolipids in amastigote survival and acidocalcisome biogenesis. Molecular microbiology. 2005;55(5):1566–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04493.x . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Xu W, Hsu FF, Baykal E, Huang J, Zhang K. Sterol Biosynthesis Is Required for Heat Resistance but Not Extracellular Survival in Leishmania. PLoS pathogens. 2014;10(10):e1004427. Epub 2014/10/24. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004427 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mukherjee S, Moitra S, Xu W, Hernandez V, Zhang K. Sterol 14-alpha-demethylase is vital for mitochondrial functions and stress tolerance in Leishmania major. PLoS pathogens. 2020;16(8):e1008810. Epub 20200820. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008810 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7462297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Tijburg LB, Vermeulen PS, van Golde LM. Ethanolamine-phosphate cytidylyltransferase. Methods Enzymol. 1992;209:258–63. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(92)09032-x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Pavlovic Z, Bakovic M. Regulation of Phosphatidylethanolamine Homeostasis—The Critical Role of CTP:Phosphoethanolamine Cytidylyltransferase (Pcyt2). Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14(2):2529–50. Epub 20130125. doi: 10.3390/ijms14022529 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3588000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Fullerton MD, Hakimuddin F, Bakovic M. Developmental and metabolic effects of disruption of the mouse CTP:phosphoethanolamine cytidylyltransferase gene (Pcyt2). Mol Cell Biol. 2007;27(9):3327–36. Epub 20070226. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01527-06 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1899976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Fullerton MD, Hakimuddin F, Bonen A, Bakovic M. The development of a metabolic disease phenotype in CTP:phosphoethanolamine cytidylyltransferase-deficient mice. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2009;284(38):25704–13. Epub 20090722. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.023846 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2757972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Leonardi R, Frank MW, Jackson PD, Rock CO, Jackowski S. Elimination of the CDP-ethanolamine pathway disrupts hepatic lipid homeostasis. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2009;284(40):27077–89. Epub 20090807. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.031336 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2785637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Signorell A, Gluenz E, Rettig J, Schneider A, Shaw MK, Gull K, et al. Perturbation of phosphatidylethanolamine synthesis affects mitochondrial morphology and cell-cycle progression in procyclic-form Trypanosoma brucei. Molecular microbiology. 2009;72(4):1068–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06713.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Gibellini F, Hunter WN, Smith TK. The ethanolamine branch of the Kennedy pathway is essential in the bloodstream form of Trypanosoma brucei. Molecular microbiology. 2009;73(5):826–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06764.x . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ha DS, Schwarz JK, Turco SJ, Beverley SM. Use of the green fluorescent protein as a marker in transfected Leishmania. Molecular and biochemical parasitology. 1996;77(1):57–64. doi: 10.1016/0166-6851(96)02580-7 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Shapira M, Pinelli E. Heat-shock protein 83 of Leishmania mexicana amazonensis is an abundant cytoplasmic protein with a tandemly repeated genomic arrangement. European journal of biochemistry / FEBS. 1989;185(2):231–6. Epub 1989/11/06. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1989.tb15107.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Turco SJ, Descoteaux A. The lipophosphoglycan of Leishmania parasites. Annual review of microbiology. 1992;46:65–94. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.46.100192.000433 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Beverley SM. Protozomics: trypanosomatid parasite genetics comes of age. Nat Rev Genet. 2003;4(1):11–9. doi: 10.1038/nrg980 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Murta SM, Vickers TJ, Scott DA, Beverley SM. Methylene tetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase/cyclohydrolase and the synthesis of 10-CHO-THF are essential in Leishmania major. Molecular microbiology. 2009;71(6):1386–401. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06610.x . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.McCall LI, El Aroussi A, Choi JY, Vieira DF, De Muylder G, Johnston JB, et al. Targeting Ergosterol biosynthesis in Leishmania donovani: essentiality of sterol 14 alpha-demethylase. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2015;9(3):e0003588. Epub 2015/03/15. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003588 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4359151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Mukherjee S, Basu S, Zhang K. Farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase is essential for the promastigote and amastigote stages in Leishmania major. Molecular and biochemical parasitology. 2019;230:8–15. Epub 2019/03/31. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2019.03.001 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6529949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Moitra S, Pawlowic MC, Hsu FF, Zhang K. Phosphatidylcholine synthesis through cholinephosphate cytidylyltransferase is dispensable in Leishmania major. Scientific reports. 2019;9(1):7602. Epub 2019/05/22. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44086-6 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6527706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.da Silva Lira Filho A, Fajardo EF, Chang KP, Clement P, Olivier. Leishmania Exosomes/Extracellular Vesicles Containing GP63 Are Essential for Enhance Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Development Upon Co-Inoculation of Leishmania amazonensis and Its Exosomes. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology. 2021;11:709258. Epub 20220203. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.709258 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8851419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.van Hellemond JJ, Slot JW, Geelen MJ, van Golde LM, Vermeulen PS. Ultrastructural localization of CTP:phosphoethanolamine cytidylyltransferase in rat liver. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1994;269(22):15415–8. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kokkonen P, Beier A, Mazurenko S, Damborsky J, Bednar D, Prokop Z. Substrate inhibition by the blockage of product release and its control by tunnel engineering. RSC Chem Biol. 2021;2(2):645–55. Epub 20210111. doi: 10.1039/d0cb00171f ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8341658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Isnard A, Shio MT, Olivier M. Impact of Leishmania metalloprotease GP63 on macrophage signaling. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology. 2012;2:72. Epub 2012/08/25. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2012.00072 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3417651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Guay-Vincent MM, Matte C, Berthiaume AM, Olivier M, Jaramillo M, Descoteaux A. Revisiting Leishmania GP63 host cell targets reveals a limited spectrum of substrates. PLoS pathogens. 2022;18(10):e1010640. Epub 20221003. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1010640 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9560592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Casgrain PA, Martel C, McMaster WR, Mottram JC, Olivier M, Descoteaux A. Cysteine Peptidase B Regulates Leishmania mexicana Virulence through the Modulation of GP63 Expression. PLoS pathogens. 2016;12(5):e1005658. Epub 20160518. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005658 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4871588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Brittingham A, Morrison CJ, McMaster WR, McGwire BS, Chang KP, Mosser DM. Role of the Leishmania surface protease gp63 in complement fixation, cell adhesion, and resistance to complement-mediated lysis. J Immunol. 1995;155(6):3102–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Field MC, Medina-Acosta E, Cross GA. Inhibition of glycosylphosphatidylinositol biosynthesis in Leishmania mexicana by mannosamine. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1993;268(13):9570–7. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Xu W, Mukherjee S, Ning Y, Hsu FF, Zhang K. Cyclopropane fatty acid synthesis affects cell shape and acid resistance in Leishmania mexicana. International journal for parasitology. 2018;48(3–4):245–56. Epub 2017/11/29. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2017.09.006 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5844833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kapler GM, Coburn CM, Beverley SM. Stable transfection of the human parasite Leishmania major delineates a 30-kilobase region sufficient for extrachromosomal replication and expression. Mol Cell Biol. 1990;10(3):1084–94. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.3.1084 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Madeira da Silva L, Owens KL, Murta SM, Beverley SM. Regulated expression of the Leishmania major surface virulence factor lipophosphoglycan using conditionally destabilized fusion proteins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2009;106(18):7583–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0901698106 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Sarkar M, Hamilton CJ, Fairlamb AH. Properties of phosphoenolpyruvate mutase, the first enzyme in the aminoethylphosphonate biosynthetic pathway in Trypanosoma cruzi. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2003;278(25):22703–8. Epub 20030402. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M302419200 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.de Ibarra AA, Howard JG, Snary D. Monoclonal antibodies to Leishmania tropica major: specificities and antigen location. Parasitology. 1982;85 (Pt 3):523–31. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000056304 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Titus RG, Marchand M, Boon T, Louis JA. A limiting dilution assay for quantifying Leishmania major in tissues of infected mice. Parasite Immunol. 1985;7(5):545–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.1985.tb00098.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–8. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Bligh EG, Dyer WJ. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Canadian journal of biochemistry and physiology. 1959;37(8):911–7. doi: 10.1139/o59-099 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Hsu FF. Mass spectrometry-based shotgun lipidomics—a critical review from the technical point of view. Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry. 2018;410(25):6387–409. Epub 2018/08/11. doi: 10.1007/s00216-018-1252-y ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6195124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Margaret A Phillips, Michael Boshart

13 Mar 2023

Dear Dr. Zhang,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Ethanolaminephosphate cytidyltransferase is essential for survival, lipid homeostasis and stress tolerance in Leishmania major" for consideration at PLOS Pathogens. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. In light of the reviews (below this email), we would like to invite the resubmission of a significantly-revised version that takes into account the reviewers' comments.

The three reviewers that have evaluated your manuscript agree that an interesting pathway and enzyme has been addressed, and a significant number of experiments have been executed with many convincing outcomes. It is particularly appreciated that the results are in contrast to current thinking of lipid uptake and that EPCT might be an attractive drug target for leishmaniasis. However, a number of concerns are raised with respect to consistency of data, data interpretation and methodology as well as clarity of writing. These issues need to be carefully and comprehensively addressed. Many of the inconsistencies mentioned by the reviewers are apparently due to insufficient methodology or statistics and therefore need additional quantifications and orthogonal experiments. Also some of the reviewer´s questions can only be answered by additional experimental data as suggested.

We cannot make any decision about publication until we have seen the revised manuscript and your response to the reviewers' comments. Your revised manuscript is also likely to be sent to reviewers for further evaluation.

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript. Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 60 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email. Please note that revised manuscripts received after the 60-day due date may require evaluation and peer review similar to newly submitted manuscripts.

Thank you again for your submission. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Michael Boshart, M.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Margaret Phillips

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

***********************

The three reviewers that have evaluated your manuscript agree that an interesting pathway and enzyme has been addressed, and a significant number of experiments have been executed with many convincing outcomes. It is particularly appreciated that the results are in contrast to current thinking of lipid uptake and that EPCT might be an attractive drug target for leishmaniasis. However, a number of concerns are raised with respect to consistency of data, data interpretation and methodology as well as clarity of writing. These issues need to be carefully and comprehensively addressed. Many of the inconsistencies mentioned by the reviewers are apparently due to insufficient methodology or statistics and therefore need additional quantifications and orthogonal experiments. Also some of the reviewer´s questions can only be answered by additional experimental data as suggested.

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Part I - Summary

Please use this section to discuss strengths/weaknesses of study, novelty/significance, general execution and scholarship.

Reviewer #1: This is a solid piece of work for the most part. There are some minor issues that need to be addressed.

In terms of novelty of the work, I was surprised by the lack of acknowledgement that this gene has been published on in very closely related T.brucei and there is no reference to this work.

There are far too many figures in the main manuscript and this should be reduced to the normal 8.

Reviewer #2: This manuscript describes an intriguing analysis of the second enzyme in the ethanolamine branch of the “Kennedy” pathway, ethanolamine phosphate cytidyltransferase (EPCT) within Leishmania major promastigote and amastigote lifecycle stages. The key takeaways are that

• the EPCT gene appears to be essential in both the promastigote and amastigote lifecycle stages and deletion of both EPCT chromosomal copies in promastigotes could only be achieved in the presence of a complementing episome.

• the episomal overexpression of EPCT caused a significant growth detect in both epct-/- promastigotes, as well as in WT, EPCT+/-, and epct-/- lesion derived amastigotes, and rendered these parasites more susceptible to nutrient starvation. Likewise, epct-/- promastigotes expressing EPCT from an episome were less tolerating of changes in pH and temperature.

• episomal overexpression of EPCT leads to dysfunction in the regulation of the “Kennedy” pathway and the synthesis of its downstream products.

• disruption of the ethanolamine metabolism by either deletion of one or both EPCT alleles or overexpression of EPCT from an episome affects the synthesis and surface expression of the GPI-anchored protein, GP63.

Overall, the systematic approach described in this manuscript makes a compelling case for EPCT as an important new drug target for future exploration in Leishmania. However, while the majority of the experiments described in the manuscript were sophisticated and well-executed, and the experimental outcomes convincing, there were a few areas where the manuscript could be improved, which I have detailed below.

Reviewer #3: In this study, the authors investigate the functional importance of an enzyme involved in lipid synthesis, Ethanolaminephosphate cytidyltransferase (EPCT), in Leishmania donovani promastigotes and amastigotes. This enzyme catalyzes the condensation of CTP with Ethanolamine phosphate to generate CDP-Ethanolamine, which is then used to generate both major sub-classes of ethanolamine phospholipids: plasmenylethanolamines (PME; major type in Leishmania) and diacyl-phosphatidylethanolamines (diacyl-PE). The authors generated heterozygote and homozygote null EPCT mutants complemented by an episomal EPCT copy that could be controlled by either positive or negative antibiotic selection. The authors then examined several phenotypic aspects of the mutants: (1) in vitro and in vivo growth of the mutants and their ability to lose the episomal copy; (2) EPCT activity, localization, and expression; (3) lipidomic changes; (4) downstream effects on lipid-anchored cell surface markers; and (5) impact on stress response.

One major finding of the work is that EPCT is essential in both promastigotes and amastigotes, based on the inability to generate homozygous nulls unless complemented with an episomal copy that cannot be lost, even under negative selection. A second major finding is that over-expression of EPCT is deleterious to the parasite, showing negative impacts on promastigote growth in culture and amastigote growth in mice (less virulent), reduction in PME and inositolphosphorylcholine (IPC) lipid species, reduction in GP63 surface expression, and impaired stress tolerance (starvation, acid, and heat). These major findings are clear and well-supported by the data and included controls.

One major strength of these findings is that they highlight the indispensable importance of EPCT to the parasite, even in the mammalian amastigote stage. This is in contrast to current thinking, based on results with other lipid synthesis mutants, that the amastigotes are less dependent upon their own lipid synthesis because they grow more slowly and can instead rely upon uptake of host lipids and lipid precursors. The results in this manuscript show that EPCT activity is still needed in the amastigote stage, implying that host resources or their acquisition is insufficient. A second strength is the very clear implication that too much EPCT activity is broadly deleterious for Leishmania, implying that a balanced tuning of lipid synthesis pathways is essential.

The manuscript does have some moderate weaknesses in its current form, which are summarized here and detailed below. The methods used for the studies shown in Fig. 4 and Fig. S5 are not described in sufficient detail for this reviewer to evaluate the data and conclusions. There is an inconsistency in the methods vs. the results with the generation of the null mutants. The potentially mixed effects of toxicity from ganciclovir treatment with toxicity from EPCT over-expression are not adequately addressed. Some speculation of effect on GP63 expression is needed. Finally, the results of the EPCT RNA expression data are confusing and not adequately addressed by the authors.

Overall, the manuscript has many strengths and represents a generally careful and thorough evaluation of the functional importance of EPCT in Leishmania. The key observations are well-supported and reveal that there is something special about the PE synthesis pathway, and more specifically, EPCT, which is needed in amastigote form and thus, constitutes an exciting new candidate drug target. So the work should be of interest to those working on drug development in eukaryotic pathogens. This research also will be of great interest to others focused more generally in lipid synthesis in kinetoplastids and other protozoan pathogens.

**********

Part II – Major Issues: Key Experiments Required for Acceptance

Please use this section to detail the key new experiments or modifications of existing experiments that should be absolutely required to validate study conclusions.

Generally, there should be no more than 3 such required experiments or major modifications for a "Major Revision" recommendation. If more than 3 experiments are necessary to validate the study conclusions, then you are encouraged to recommend "Reject".

Reviewer #1: There are four experimental issues that should be addressed.

1) in fig 2Athe authors use over expressing EPCT in the Leish background to show for activity. This is done by the level of the upper "CDP-Etn" band. Granted we see a more intense ban in the OE cell lines, but there is presence of this band in the buffer only (which is very concerning" and also the boiled (so dentures protein) controls, why would this be so. I would like to suggest that may be the higher band is not CDP-EthN, but may be Etn that has no P , in other words it has been dephosphorylkated. This could arise by the radioactive Etn-P partially degraded or phosphatase activity present, which there will be lots of in the lysate. Show me on a TLC where EthN runs rot be certain.

Fig 2B shows the anti-GFP protein bands which show several in the middle lane... thus when this is translated to the IF, then not only is the full length fusion showing up but also the truncated versions.. all of which are being visualised in the IF images. Localisations in cells normally requires a sub-cellular fractionation and IF, so the authors need to do a simple sub-cellular fraction western, then at least then they can be certain that the full length GFP +ve band is in the cytsol. also why do DAPI staining?

The authors clearly show that the levels of certain lipid species are decreased both in the cells over expressing or under expressing the EPCT. So the authors look at PE and PC, but also PI and IPC species, however the decrease in lipid content by these species, must be compensated for by another lid, which the authors have not shown, please show the full survey scans.. what else is going on? The cells obviously divide at a reasonable rate, so is their morphology or cell volume changed.. we do see any images of these modified cell. In the T.brucei work clear shows the cell volume has decreased, as well as the mitochondria... which the authors here do not even consider investigate with mitotracker, despite PE being so important for the Mito.

Reviewer #2: Major issues to be addressed:

• It’s unclear how the levels of GP63 were quantified for the different cell lines described? It appears that the values were derived from the immunofluorescence images captured. I have reservations about the accuracy of this approach, since I imagine it can be affected by any number of things including changes in the sample processing, gain and exposure settings, differences in the focal plane. At the very least, it would have been helpful to provide some indication for the number of cells enumerated and included another fluorescence marker (e.g., anti-tubulin) as a normalization control for the image analysis. A better and more standard approach would have been to include a quantitative western analysis using the anti-GP63 antisera.

Reviewer #3: Specific comments:

1. Fig 4 (Panels C-F) and Fig. S5 (Panel A) – Post-Sorting Recovery of High-GFP population. The methods and interpretation of this experiment are unclear. The GFP-low population in D (epct– + pXNG4-EPCT + GCV) was isolated by cell sorting then clones isolated by serial dilution. The population immediately after isolation is not shown, so quality of sorting is not able to be evaluated. Also it is not clear how the cells were propagated after sorting & cloning. During clone outgrowth, was GCV absent, was SAT present, or were all antibiotics omitted? Not clear how conclusion on Line 208 “GFP-low cells were only viable in the presence of GFP-high cells” is reached? What is this based on? Cannot follow that conclusion’s logic here. To me, this just seems like the recovery of the “high-GFP” population just reflects removal of GCV-negative selection on the episomal copy, and subsequent expansion of episomal copy number. qPCR of episomal copy number was performed (Fig. S5A), but it is not clear what time point after clonal isolation and outgrowth and in what culturing conditions (presence of antibiotics) were the samples taken for qPCR analysis. Was this immediately after cell sorting out the low GFP population?

2. Ganciclovir (GCV) treatment is toxic to cells expressing Thymidylate Kinase (TK) on the episome, which serves as a negative selection for the episomal EPCT copy. However, cells that cannot lose the episomal EPCT are potentially suffering from TWO effects that are happening at the same time: toxicity from GCV and toxicity from EPCT over-expression. I would like to see a little more discussion of this, and can your data shed any light on the relative contribution of GCV toxicity vs. EPCT over-expression might be having to the impaired growth you’re seeing in Fig. S5B and Fig. 5. I think there are some clues in your data that GCV toxicity might be contributing more to impaired growth in vivo in amastigotes than in Promastigotes, cross-correlating episome copy number vs. EPCT mRNA levels.

3. In addition to the point above, I’d like to see some attempt in the Discussion to consider the phenotypes in light of the episome copy number and EPCT mRNA data. Particularly as the Fig. 6C EPCT mRNA expression data is surprising, showing that GCV treatment increased EPCT mRNA levels in two of the EPCT over-expressing lines, when I would have expected it to decrease due to negative selection on the episome. The data is all a little puzzling as the in vivo lesion progression, the EPCT mRNA, and the episomal copy numbers don’t correlate very well.

4. In general the EPCT heterozygotes (+/–) had almost no phenotype in the various assays you did – indeed one copy seemed sufficient. So I was surprised that GP63 surface staining by immunofluorescence was as affected in the +/– as in the three over-expression mutants. Why do you think GP63 expression was so sensitive to EPCT haploinsufficiency?

5. Comment/Thought - One possibility for the effect of EPCT over-expression is that it could be exerting its effect through depletion of cellular CTP, as well as the changes you saw in PE and IPC species.

**********

Part III – Minor Issues: Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications

Please use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity.

Reviewer #1: I think most of fig 3 can be moved to supplementary, as can the quantification of the mRNA/copies per cell bar charts.

In fig 1 .. the pathway schematic they show the 1-alkyl-2-acylPE going to -alkenyl-acyl-PE, is this really true, have theu authors knowledge of a Desaturase that works solely on the 1-alkyl-2-acylPE with no suchance of 1-alkenyl-2-acyl being the direct acceptor to the EPT?

Following on from this are the authors certain there is no 1-alkyl-2-acyl PC, hence the SAM methyl transferases only work on diacyl species?

Reviewer #2: Minor comments for overall manuscript improvement:

• Figures S3 and S4: It’s unclear whether both of the heterozygotes shown were derived from the BSD gene replacement construct? The text (Lns 169-170) indicates this is the case. Did the authors try this the other way around? In other words, did they verify that the other gene replacement construct integrates appropriately into the chromosome? It’s not really a necessary control since the data with the epct-/- complemented cell line that is dependent on the presence of the episome implies that both gene copies were deleted, however, I am surprised that the authors didn’t provide Southern data showing the loss of both chromosomal alles.

• Figure S5b: I assume from the figure that just the growth point at day 2 was significantly different between the epct-/- complemented cell line and the other cell lines? What were the significance values for the other data points? I’m also curious why the cell lines appear to have different starting densities at day 0?

• While the data in Figure 5A was highly compelling, I found the text describing this figure to be less so, mainly due to the fact that the effect of EPCT overexpression wasn’t discussed alongside the other data. I think the two sections “EPCT is indispensable for L. major amastigotes” and “EPCT overexpression leads to significantly attenuated virulence in mice” could be combined and shortened. This would serve to focus the attention on the key takeaways for this figure.

• For Figure 6C, I noticed that EPCT mRNA levels were increased significantly for WT and epct-/- cell lines containing the pXNG4-EPCT episome in the presence of GCV in comparison to PBS control, which seems a little surprising. Perhaps the authors can comment a little more on this observation in the text.

• Figures 7-9 contain a large amount of data (changes in the level of several PE, PC, and PI metabolites for several different cell lines). I suggest moving this data to a table to make it easier to digest (though I’d focus the table on only the major differences). Figures 7 – 9 could still be included, but as supplemental data.

• The starvation data is intriguing and I wonder if this phenotype might be related to defects in autophagic vesicle formation. Perhaps the authors could speculate on this possibility? Finally, I’m curious whether the authors have considered exploring the susceptibility of the complemented cell lines (WT, EPCT+/-, and epct-/-) to antileishmanial drugs? On the one had these cells seem to be more susceptible to stressors such as nutrient starvation, and pH and heat shock, but

• Figure 2B and C: GFP-EPCT is clearly overexpressed in these cells, but from the western analysis it appears that there are also some likely degradation products, possibly resulting in GFP protein alone. I’m wondering how this might affect the assertion of GFP-EPCT being a cytosolic protein? The authors mention that the two enzymes immediately downstream from EPCT are localized to the ER. What is known about the enzyme immediately upstream of EPCT? Perhaps the authors can speculate on whether the cytosolic location makes sense for EPCT in the context of the other proteins?

• In the discussion, Lns 330-331, the phrase “it is time to recognize EPCT as the most important enzyme of the “Kennedy” pathway needs rephrasing to be less subjective.

• In the discussion, Ln 359, the authors discuss substrate inhibition of the downstream enzymes CEPT and EPT as a plausible cause of decreased diacyl PE and PME production. I wonder what is known about the association of these different activities in other cells, specifically, whether they can be found in complex? In this context, overexpression of EPCT might also disrupt the stoichiometry of the other components of the “Kennedy” pathway, leading to decreased production of the downstream products.

Reviewer #3: 6. In description of constructing the episome-assisted KOs (Lines 174-185), the text says gene replacement with BSD cassette was first, followed by episome introduction, then deletion of second allele with PAC cassette. But in Fig. 3A and using Fig. S4 scheme, it looks like PAC was first replacement then BSD. In Fig. 3A – the heterozygote shows the PAC band and the WT band (lane 2), implying it was the first gene replacement.

7. In Discussion, some care should be made about concluding localization of EPCT to cytoplasm using an over-expression construct (Fig. 2C). It could be the higher level of expression of EPCT could “swamp” out the localization mechanism, leading to overall cytoplasmic pattern. It’s consistent with cytoplasmic localization (and localization of other EPCT enzymes in other organisms), but localization at WT levels of expression need to be done to confirm localization.

8. In Fig. 10, it is not indicated in the Materials and Methods how the quantitation in panel C was done. Is this quantitation from a western blot or from the immunofluorescence? This info should be added to the M&M.

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: Yes: Kimberly Paul

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here on PLOS Biology: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

Decision Letter 1

Margaret A Phillips, Michael Boshart

17 Jun 2023

Dear Dr. Zhang,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Ethanolaminephosphate cytidyltransferase is essential for survival, lipid homeostasis and stress tolerance in Leishmania major" for consideration at PLOS Pathogens. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. The reviewers appreciated the attention to an important topic. Based on the reviews, we are likely to accept this manuscript for publication, providing that you modify the manuscript according to the review recommendations as indicated below.

Reviewers of the revised manuscript acknowledge that additional data, text additions and corrections have significantly improved the work. However, a number of minor points remain to be corrected as indicated in their specific comments. In addition, we agree with reviewer 1 that the IF in Fig. 2D does not prove cytoplasmic localization. The resolution of the images is relatively low and absence of a specific subcellular localization of a tagged protein does not positively argue for cytoplasmic localization. A simple cell fractionation (100.000 g supernatant) as suggested by reviewer 1 would be much more informative and should be provided. Fig. 3 should be moved to supplement, also to conform with journal standards.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 30 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email.

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to all review comments, and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Thank you again for your submission to our journal. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Michael Boshart, M.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Margaret Phillips

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

***********************

Reviewer Comments (if any, and for reference):

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Part I - Summary

Please use this section to discuss strengths/weaknesses of study, novelty/significance, general execution and scholarship.

Reviewer #2: This manuscript takes a systematic approach to dissect the function and significance of EPCT for promastigote growth and amastigote virulence. The key findings suggest that contrary to the prevailing theory that Leishmania amastigotes rely solely on the uptake of host lipid to fulfill their needs, EPCT is an essential enzyme with likely a regulatory role in both stages of the parasite. The revised manuscript is much improved in both layout and its experimental detail, and I consider the experiments to be well-executed and the conclusions drawn generally to be supported by the results.

Reviewer #3: In this study, the authors investigate the functional importance of an enzyme involved in lipid synthesis, Ethanolaminephosphate cytidyltransferase (EPCT), in Leishmania donovani. The authors present evidence that EPCT is required in both the promastigote stages as well as in vivo amastigotes. The requirement in amastigotes is novel, as prior work on other lipid synthesis genes suggest amastigotes rely primarily on host lipids rather than de novo synthesis. The other interesting and novel finding is that over-expression of EPCT is deleterious as well, perturbing PE and PI species, causing reduced virulence, and reduced tolerance to stress. Overall, this work is novel and interesting.

The authors largely addressed all the reviewers' comments. The revision included an expanded discussion, more experimental details, and additional experiments. The manuscript is much improved in clarity and impact.

**********

Part II – Major Issues: Key Experiments Required for Acceptance

Please use this section to detail the key new experiments or modifications of existing experiments that should be absolutely required to validate study conclusions.

Generally, there should be no more than 3 such required experiments or major modifications for a "Major Revision" recommendation. If more than 3 experiments are necessary to validate the study conclusions, then you are encouraged to recommend "Reject".

Reviewer #2: None noted

Reviewer #3: None

**********

Part III – Minor Issues: Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications

Please use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity.

Reviewer #2: There are just a few very minor edits that I would suggest to improve the clarity of the manuscript.

1. For lns 284 and 410, where the authors indicate that the effects observed are due to a wearing down of GCV, I'd suggest changing this language to "may be due to the level of GCV likely being below the minimum effective concentration".

2. I believe that for ln 327 the figure the authors refer to should be 9D (not 9C) and for ln 329 Fig. 9 D-F should be Fig. 9C and F.

Reviewer #3: Minor edits:

Line 79 - should read "...(EtN-P) is generated from the sphingoid..."

Line 327 - This refers to Fig. 9D not 9C.

Line 329 - Refers to Fig. 9C,E,F not Fig. 9D-F

Line 340 - "combing" should be "combining"

Line 699 - Refers to Fig. 3 not Fig. 2

Line 738-739 - Statement about the structures of major PC species illustrated should be deleted. No structures are in the figure.

Line 742 and Fig. S11 - It looks like in the spectra that the indicated internal standard was not set at 100% relative intensity. Instead, it looks like d16:1/18:0-IPC (m/z 778.6) is set to 100% relative intensity and the other peaks normalized to that species. Maybe that IPC species was the internal standard?

Figure 8B - not sure what band(s) correspond(s) to LPG? Which band or set of bands is being quantified to generate the data in Fig. 8C?

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: Yes: Kimberly Paul

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

References:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Decision Letter 2

Margaret A Phillips, Michael Boshart

12 Jul 2023

Dear Dr. Zhang,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Ethanolaminephosphate cytidyltransferase is essential for survival, lipid homeostasis and stress tolerance in Leishmania major' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Pathogens.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Pathogens.

Best regards,

Michael Boshart, M.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Margaret Phillips

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

***********************************************************

The authers have successfully performed the addition cell fractionation experiments that supports cyctplasmic localization and responded to the reviewer comments. Their response to the following requests for clarification of reviewer 3 has not yet been included in a modified legend for figures 8 and S11. This can be easily done.

start citation-Line 742 and Fig. S11 - It looks like in the spectra that the indicated internal standard was not set at

100% relative intensity. Instead, it looks like d16:1/18:0-IPC (m/z 778.6) is set to 100% relative intensity

and the other peaks normalized to that species. Maybe that IPC species was the internal standard?

In mass spectrometry chromatogram, the most abundant peak is automatically set as 100%. In Fig. S11,

the abundance of d16:1/18:0-IPC (m/z 778.6) is higher than that of the internal standard 16:0/16:0-PI

(m/z 809.6). Quantitation was still done using the internal standard.

Figure 8B - not sure what band(s) correspond(s) to LPG? Which band or set of bands is being quantified

to generate the data in Fig. 8C?

LPG is a heterologous in glycan chain length and side chain modification (PMID: 1444269). The antibody

WIC79.3 detects the side chain Gal residues and a smear for LPG (PMID: 6184664). The area between-end citation

15-100 KD was used to quantify LPG.

Reviewer Comments (if any, and for reference):

Acceptance letter

Margaret A Phillips, Michael Boshart

22 Jul 2023

Dear Dr. Zhang,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "Ethanolaminephosphate cytidylyltransferase is essential for survival, lipid homeostasis and stress tolerance in Leishmania major," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Pathogens.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the pre-publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Pearls, Reviews, Opinions, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript, if you opted to have an early version of your article, will be published online. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Pathogens.

Best regards,

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Alignment of EPCT amino acid sequences from Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Sc, Genbank: P33412), Plasmodium falciparum (Pf, Plasmodb: PfDd2_130053500), Leishmania major (Lm, Tritrypdb: LmjF.32.0890), Arabidopsis thaliana (At, TAIR: AT2G38670.1), and Homo sapiens (Hs, Genbank: Q99447) using Clustal Omega.

    Asterisks (*): fully conserved residues; colons (:) highly similar residues; periods (.): moderately similar residues. Color code for amino acids: red-nonpolar; green-polar; blue-acidic; purple-basic.

    (PDF)

    S2 Fig. Detection of EPCT activity with thin layer chromatography (TLC).

    (A) EtN-P or CDP-EtN (40 nmol each) are resolved by TLC as described in Materials and Methods. The plate was dried and sprayed with 0.2% ninhydrin to show the positions of EtN-P and CDP-EtN. (B) Mouse liver lysates (boiled and not boiled, two repeats each) were incubated with [14C]-EtN-P at room temperature, followed by TLC analysis and signals were detected by autoradiography.

    (PDF)

    S3 Fig. Chromosomal EPCT-null mutants cannot be generated without a complementing episome.

    Genomic DNA samples from L. major FV1 WT, LV39 WT, EPCT+/- (#1 and #2), and putative epct¯ (#1D, #1E, and #1F) parasites were digested by Hind III + Bam HI followed by Southern blot analyses using radiolabeled probes for an upstream flanking sequence (5’ probe: A and C) and the open reading frame of EPCT (ORF probe: B and D). The approximate recognition sites of Hind III and Bam HI and expected DNA fragment sizes are indicated in E.

    (PDF)

    S4 Fig. Scheme of the Southern blot in Fig 3.

    Expected DNA fragment sizes for using the 5’ probe (A-B) or ORF probe of EPCT (C-D) are indicated. TK: thymidine kinase, GFP: green fluorescent protein, SAT: nourseothricin resistance gene.

    (PDF)

    S5 Fig. Attempts to isolate GFP-low cells from epct¯+pXNG4-EPCT by FACS.

    (A) Epct¯+pXNG4-EPCT promastigotes were cultivated in the presence of GCV and absence of SAT for 14 passages as indicated in Fig 4D. GFP-low population (B) was separated from GFP-high population (C) by FACS. Single clones were then isolated from the GFP-low population (B) via serial dilution followed by two consecutive rounds of expansion in the presence of GCV and absence of SAT (D and E represent the first and second round of expansion respectively). GFP expression levels in A-E were analyzed by flow cytometry.

    (PDF)

    S6 Fig. Chromosomal EPCT-null promastigotes cannot lose the pXNG4-EPCT episome.

    (A) EPCT+/- + pXNG4-EPCT and epct¯ + pXNG4-EPCT promastigotes were cultivated in the presence of SAT or GCV for 14 passages (as pools) and individual clones were isolated via FACS followed by serial dilution as described in Materials and Methods. Plasmid copy number numbers (average ± SDs) were determined by qPCR. (B) Promastigotes were cultivated at 27°C in complete M199 media and culture densities were determined daily using a hemocytometer. Error bars indicate standard deviations from three biological repeats (*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01).

    (PDF)

    S7 Fig. EPCT overexpression leads to reduced growth in BALB/c mice.

    Following footpad infection, mice were treated with GCV or PBS and euthanized at the indicated timepoints. (A) Mouse body weights were measured at day 0–21 post infection. (B) Genomic DNA samples were prepared from lesion-derived amastigotes and parasite loads were determined by qPCR using primers targeting the L. major 28S rDNA gene (*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001).

    (PDF)

    S8 Fig. EPCT overexpression leads to attenuated virulence in BALB/c mice.

    Stationary phase promastigotes were injected into the footpad of BALB/c mice as described in Materials and Methods. Footpad lesion sizes were measured using a Vernier caliper (A) and parasite loads were determined by qPCR (B). **: p < 0.01.

    (PDF)

    S9 Fig. EPCT overexpression leads to reduced levels of PME.

    Total lipids were extracted from log phase promastigotes and analyzed by ESI-MS in the negative ion mode as described in Materials and Methods. The 14:0/14:0-PE (m/z 634.5) was added as an internal standard. Representative tandem mass spectra obtained from precursor ion scan of m/z 196 specifically monitoring PME and diacyl-PE species were shown for WT, EPCT+/-, WT + pXNG4-EPCT, EPCT+/- + pXNG4-EPCT, and epct¯ + pXNG4-EPCT. Major PME species such as p18:0/18:2-PE (m/z 726.5) and p18:0/18:1-PE (m/z 728.5) were indicated.

    (PDF)

    S10 Fig. EPCT overexpression does not affect the synthesis of PC.

    Total lipids were extracted from log phase promastigotes and analyzed by ESI-MS in the positive ion mode as described in Materials and Methods. The 14:0/14:0-PC (m/z 678.5) was added as an internal standard. Representative tandem mass spectra obtained from precursor ion scan of m/z 184 specifically monitoring PC and sphingomyelin species were shown for WT, EPCT+/-, WT + pXNG4-EPCT, EPCT+/- + pXNG4-EPCT, and epct¯ + pXNG4-EPCT. Major PC species such as 18:2/18:2-PC (m/z 782.6) and 18:2/22:6-PC (m/z 830.6) were illustrated.

    (PDF)

    S11 Fig. EPCT overexpression leads to reduced levels of PI.

    Total lipids were extracted from log phase promastigotes and analyzed by ESI-MS in the negative ion mode as described in Materials and Methods. The 16:0/16:0-PI (m/z: 809.6) was added as an internal standard. Representative tandem mass spectra obtained from precursor ion scan of m/z 241 (specific for PI) were shown for WT, EPCT+/-, WT + pXNG4-EPCT, EPCT+/- + pXNG4-EPCT, and epct¯ + pXNG4-EPCT. Major PI species were indicated.

    (PDF)

    S12 Fig. EPCT overexpression does not affect the cellular levels of IPC.

    Total lipids were extracted from stationary phase promastigotes and analyzed by ESI/MS in the negative ion mode using both total ion current scan and precursor ion scan of m/z 241. Error bars represent standard deviations from 4 independent experiments.

    (PDF)

    S13 Fig. EPCT overexpression does not affect mitochondrial ROS production.

    Log phase promastigotes were cultivated in complete M199 medium (A, C) or transferred to PBS (B, D) and labeled with MitoSox Red for 25 min at ambient temperature. Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) for MitoSox Red (A, B) and percentages of dead cells (C, D) were determined by flow cytometry at the indicated timepoints. Cell growth rates in M199 or PBS were determined by hemocytometer counting (E). Error bars represent standard deviations from three independent experiments.

    (PDF)

    S1 Table. List of oligonucleotides used in this study.

    Sequences in lowercase represent restriction enzyme sites.

    (PDF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to review 05-2023.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to review 07-2023.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS Pathogens are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES