Abstract
In reports on ophthalmological research the results of measurements on the eye are often expressed as mean and standard deviation based on m patients, n eyes (n greater than m). This approach leads to t tests that are invalid because the measurements on the two eyes of one subject are usually related, not independent. In a simulation study involving intraocular pressure data analysed in this way, the null hypothesis of no difference between groups was rejected at a nominal alpha = 0.05 level in 39 out of 200 simulations; thus the true alpha was nearly 0.2. This approach is excessively prone to produce false positive results.
Full text
PDFdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4e93/c4e93bedd87db42e731e9708da457df51fc6ccfe" alt="645"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d06a/4d06a64a5ab35f415b9c84f347603d407c6aaeae" alt="646"
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Duff G. R., Watt A. H., Graham P. A. A comparison of the effects of oral nadolol and topical timolol on intraocular pressure, blood pressure, and heart rate. Br J Ophthalmol. 1987 Sep;71(9):698–700. doi: 10.1136/bjo.71.9.698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hills M., Armitage P. The two-period cross-over clinical trial. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1979 Jul;8(1):7–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1979.tb05903.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]