Skip to main content
PLOS Genetics logoLink to PLOS Genetics
. 2023 Jul 31;19(7):e1010713. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010713

Lipidomic QTL in Diversity Outbred mice identifies a novel function for α/β hydrolase domain 2 (Abhd2) as an enzyme that metabolizes phosphatidylcholine and cardiolipin

Tara R Price 1, Donnie S Stapleton 1, Kathryn L Schueler 1, Marie K Norris 2, Brian W Parks 3, Brian S Yandell 4, Gary A Churchill 5, William L Holland 2, Mark P Keller 1, Alan D Attie 1,*
Editor: David A Buchner6
PMCID: PMC10414554  PMID: 37523383

Abstract

We and others have previously shown that genetic association can be used to make causal connections between gene loci and small molecules measured by mass spectrometry in the bloodstream and in tissues. We identified a locus on mouse chromosome 7 where several phospholipids in liver showed strong genetic association to distinct gene loci. In this study, we integrated gene expression data with genetic association data to identify a single gene at the chromosome 7 locus as the driver of the phospholipid phenotypes. The gene encodes α/β-hydrolase domain 2 (Abhd2), one of 23 members of the ABHD gene family. We validated this observation by measuring lipids in a mouse with a whole-body deletion of Abhd2. The Abhd2KO mice had a significant increase in liver levels of phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylethanolamine. Unexpectedly, we also found a decrease in two key mitochondrial lipids, cardiolipin and phosphatidylglycerol, in male Abhd2KO mice. These data suggest that Abhd2 plays a role in the synthesis, turnover, or remodeling of liver phospholipids.

Author summary

Lipids have broad roles in normal physiology and disruptions to lipid metabolism have been linked to disease development; new roles for the enzymes that metabolize lipids are still being discovered. To identify novel genes associated with a wide array of liver lipids, we conducted a genetic screen of untargeted liver lipidomics in a genetically diverse mouse population. We identified the enzyme, Abhd2, as a candidate driver of multiple liver phospholipids. Further, we validated Abhd2 in a whole-body knockout mouse model, where loss of Abhd2 resulted in increased liver phosphatidylcholine and a marked decrease in the mitochondrial lipids, cardiolipin and phosphatidylglycerol. Thus, the genetic screen and in vivo validation enabled us to discover a previously unknown role of Abhd2 in regulating liver phospholipids, including those associated with mitochondrial membranes. Our study highlights the power of lipid genetic screens to nominate and identify novel substrates for enzymes and their larger role in physiology.

Introduction

Lipids play a variety of roles in physiology, including providing structure, signaling and as fuel sources. Disruptions to lipid metabolism can lead to disease states such as obesity [1, 2], insulin resistance [3, 4], cardiovascular disease [5, 6], and hepatic steatosis [7, 8]. Manipulations to lipid composition in plasma, tissues, and organelles can have a profound impact on disease susceptibility. For example, alterations in the fatty acid compositions of lipids in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) have been shown to affect obesity-associated ER stress and to improve glucose metabolism in a leptin-deficient mouse model of obesity [9].

Improvements in detection methods and their sensitivity, such as untargeted lipidomics, have allowed for discovery of previously undefined roles of lipids in physiology. Within the past decade, a new class of lipids (fatty acid esters of hydroxy fatty acids, FAHFAs) have been discovered [10]. For example, the identification of FAHFAs as a novel bioactive lipid class has opened a new field of study into their roles in normal physiology and metabolic disease [1113].

Commensurate with the diversity of lipids is the diversity of enzymes that metabolize lipids. One substantial challenge is discovering the in vivo substrates of lipid metabolizing enzymes and the enzymes responsible for synthesis and turnover of newly discovered lipids.

We have used genetics to assist us in establishing a causal link between enzymes and their substrates. When we perform lipidomic surveys in the context of a segregating population, we can identify loci where specific lipid species are genetically associated with loci harboring genes that encode highly plausible candidate enzymes responsible for the metabolism of the lipids. In a prior study, we showed that the substrate and product of an enzyme in glycosphingolipid metabolism mapped to a locus containing that enzyme [14]. This was a proof-of-principle that genetics could be used to de-orphanize lipid metabolism enzymes.

The same study identified several ABHD members as modulators of lipid classes [14]. In validation experiments, ABHD1 and ABHD3 overexpression revealed distinct specificity for lipid classes and acyl chain lengths. The ABHD family of such enzymes (α/β -hydrolase domain) has 23 known members, which are characterized by a α/β -hydrolase fold and a catalytic serine hydrolase domain [15, 16]. ABHD6 is the most characterized lipase in this family, with a wide variety of physiological roles including adipose biology, islet insulin secretion, and cold tolerance [1720]. ABHD3, another lipase, was shown to selectively modulate phospholipids with C14 acyl chain lengths [21]. The biological roles of many ABHD family members are still being discovered. Here, we incorporate murine liver untargeted, mass spectrometry-based lipidomics and quantitative trait loci (QTL) genetics to identify α/β-hydrolase domain 2 (Abhd2) as a novel driver of hepatic phospholipids.

Results

Identification of ABHD2 as novel driver of liver phosphatidylcholine

In a recent genetic screen of circulating and hepatic lipids in Diversity Outbred (DO) mice, we identified a quantitative trait locus (QTL) for multiple phospholipids phosphatidylcholine (PC) and phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) on chromosome 7 at ~79 Mbp [22]. In parallel, we performed RNA-sequencing to survey the liver transcriptome in the same DO mice that were used for the lipidomic survey, enabling us to identify expression QTL (eQTL) for all genes. We found a strong association of the abundance of the Abhd2 mRNA with SNPs located near the Abhd2 gene (a cis-eQTL) with a LOD of 65. This QTL co-mapped with the phospholipid QTL on chromosome 7 (Fig 1A).

Fig 1. Identification of Abhd2 as a driver of phosphatidylcholine (PC) and phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) in liver.

Fig 1

(A) LOD profiles for Abhd2 expression and abundance of several phospholipids in liver identify a common quantitative trait locus (QTL) at ~79 Mbp on chromosome 7. (B) Allele effects for the phospholipids and Abhd2 expression at the chromosome 7 QTL. LOD scores are shown along the right margin and genotypes for the alleles (associated strains) are listed along the top axis. (C) Chromosome 7 SNP association profiles for PC 20:4 QTL (left axis) and Abhd2 eQTL (right axis). All protein-coding genes located between 78.5 and 79.7 Mbp are shown. A block of SNPs with highest association to PC 20:4 and Abhd2 expression are centered over Abhd2 gene (yellow highlight). (D) Mediation analysis was performed on PC 20:4 QTL by conditioning the lipid QTL on individual genes across the genome. Conditioning on Abhd2 resulted in the only significant decrease in the LOD for PC 20:4.

DO mice segregate alleles from eight founder strains. We can identify the contribution of each allele to a given phenotype and display the allele effect patterns. The allele effect patterns for the phospholipids and the Abhd2 eQTL were similar, partitioning the founder haplotypes into two subgroups: CAST and WSB versus B6, A/J, NOD and 129 (Fig 1B). However, the directionality of the haplotype separation was different for the phospholipids and Abhd2 expression. Whereas alleles derived from CAST and WSB were associated with high expression of Abhd2, the same alleles were associated with lower abundance of phospholipids (Fig 1B). Thus, the phospholipids and Abhd2 expression show shared but inverted genetic architecture. This inverse pattern is indicative of a “substrate” signature, suggesting that Abhd2 participates in the phospholipid’s degradation.

Next, we identified the SNPs most strongly associated with the phospholipids and the expression of Abhd2. The QTL for PC-20:4 peaks at ~79.2 Mbp and includes a block of SNPs with strongest association, which span from ~79.2 to ~79.4 Mbp on chromosome 7 (Fig 1C). The gene for Abhd2 is located ~79.3 Mbp, right under the SNPs with strongest association to PC-20:4. The SNP association profile for the Abhd2 cis-eQTL was the same as that for PC-20:4, suggesting a common genetic architecture for the lipids and Abhd2 expression. There are 67 protein-coding and non-coding genes that are located between 78.2 and 80.2 Mbp on Chr 7 (S1 Table).

We next used mediation analysis to identify a causal gene driver from among the genes present at the phospholipid QTL. In mediation analysis, the QTL for a lipid is conditioned on the expression of all other genes, including those at the locus to which the lipid maps. If the genetic signal of the lipid QTL decreases upon conditioning of the expression level of a specific gene, that gene becomes a strong candidate as a driver for the lipid QTL. We focused on the QTL for PC-20:4, as this demonstrated the strongest genetic signal (Fig 1A). Mediation of the PC-20:4 QTL against the expression of Abhd2 in liver resulted in a large drop in the LOD score for the PC 20:4 QTL (Fig 1D). To extend these observations, we asked if Abhd2 is a strong driver for all phospholipids mapping to the chromosome 7 QTL. For the seven phospholipids with a QTL to the Abhd2 gene locus, mediation against Abhd2 expression resulted in the largest drop in the LOD scores (S1 Fig). In summary, the inverse allele effects for the phospholipid versus Abhd2 expression profiles strongly suggest that Abhd2 functions as a negative driver of the hepatic phospholipid QTL on chromosome 7.

Experimental validation of Abhd2 as a driver of liver phospholipids

To determine if Abhd2 is a key driver of liver phospholipids, we obtained a whole-body knockout of Abhd2 from Dr. Polina Lishko at UC Berkeley [23, 24]. Wildtype (WT) and Abhd2 knockout (Abhd2KO) mice were maintained on the same Western diet (WD), high in fat and sucrose, that was provided to DO mice used for the lipidomic genetic screen [14].

To experimentally validate the genetic prediction that Abhd2 is a driver of liver phospholipids (PC and PE), we performed mass spectrometry (MS)-based lipidomics on liver tissue from male and female WT and Abhd2KO mice. A total of 583 unique lipid species were quantified (S2 and S3 Tables), including 67 and 50 PC and PE lipids, respectively. Fig 2 highlights the liver lipids that were the most differentially abundant between WT and Abhd2KO mice. Female Abhd2KO mice had 21 liver lipids decreased and 9 lipids increased (Fig 2A), whereas male Abhd2KO mice showed 44 and 16 liver lipids decreased and increased, respectively (Fig 2B). Consistent with the prediction from the genetic screen, the PC and PE species that mapped to the chromosome 7 QTL were significantly increased in liver from both male and female Abhd2KO mice (Fig 2C).

Fig 2. Abhd2KO have reduced levels of hepatic lipids predicted from lipidomic genetic screen.

Fig 2

MS-based lipomics was used to survey the level of ~580 lipids in liver of WT and Abhd2KO mice. A total of 29 and 60 lipids were differentially abundant in female (A) and male (B) Abhd2KO mice. Specific lipid classes (PC and PE, CL and PG) are indicated by color. In both female and male mice, several phospholipid species were increased in Abhd2KO mice (C). These same lipids demonstrated a QTL to the Abhd2 gene locus on chromosome 7. Male Abhd2KO mice have a significant decrease in seven cardiolipin (CL) species (D). PC and CL data are presented as pmol lipid per mg liver tissue.

In addition to PC and PE, other lipids were significantly altered in the liver of Abhd2KO mice. For example, several species of cardiolipin (CL) (Fig 2D) and phosphatidylglycerol (PG) (S2A Fig) were significantly reduced in liver from male, but not female, Abhd2KO mice. CL and PG are synthesized in mitochondria[25] and play important roles in mitochondrial function [26]. To determine if the decrease in CL and PG levels in Abhd2KO males reflect a change in mitochondrial number, we performed quantitative PCR for several mitochondrial-encoded genes. In both male and female Abhd2KO mice, the expression of eight mitochondrial-encoded genes was not significantly different in WT vs. Abhd2KO mice (S2B Fig). These results suggest that lower levels of hepatic CL and PG in male Abhd2KO mice are not the consequence of reduced mitochondrial number. It is therefore more likely that ABHD2 plays a key role in the metabolism of these two mitochondrial lipids.

To provide additional support for ABHD2 in regulating hepatic PG and CL levels, we asked if there was genetic association for CL and PG lipid species in liver among DO mice. We identified several QTL for both lipids, including a hotspot on chromosome 3 at ~46 Mbp where several CL species co-mapped (S4 Table). CL-16.0/18.1/16.0/18.1 yielded the strongest genetic signal on chromosome 3, with a LOD of ~12, along with possible secondary QTL on chromosomes 7 and 13 (Fig 3A). Interestingly, the gene Abhd18, which is relatively uncharacterized but has been localized to mitochondria [27], is physically located at the CL QTL on chromosome 3, raising the possibility that Abhd18 and Abhd2 work in concert to regulate CL levels. While no CL species mapped to the Abhd2 gene locus on chromosome 7, conditioning CL on PC-20.4/22.6 as an additive covariate resulted in CL acquiring a QTL to the Abhd2 locus (Fig 3A). This QTL on chromosome 7 of CL adjusted by PC demonstrates an allele pattern that is like that of the cis-eQTL for Abhd2, and the inverse of the PC QTL (Fig 3B), consistent with CL being a downstream product of ABHD2-dependent metabolism of PC. Similar results were observed for two PG lipids; when conditioned on PC-20.4/22.6, QTL were acquired to the Abhd2 gene locus (S5 Table).

Fig 3. A cardiolipin hotspot on chromosome 3 is associated with a phosphatidylcholine hotspot on chromosome 7.

Fig 3

(A) Genome-wide LOD profile of liver PC (20:4/22:6, blue) identified a QTL on chromosome 7 at ~79 Mbp. Genome-wide LOD profiles for CL (16:0/18:1/16:0/18:1) without (tan) and with (red) conditioning on PC (20:4/22:6) identified QTL on chromosomes 3 at ~46 Mbp and 7 at ~79 Mbp, respectively. (B) Allele effects of CL (left), PC (middle), and CL conditioned on PC as an additive covariate (right, denoted CL|PC). CL and PC show distinct allele effect pattern; however, CL conditioned on PC shows a similar, but inverse pattern to PC.

Changes in fatty acyl composition (number of carbons and degree of saturation) have been associated with differential response to metabolic stressors [28, 29]. Therefore, we evaluated the composition of the acyl chains in PC, PG, and CL lipids in WT and Abhd2KO mice (S2C–S2E Fig). Both PC and PG lipid classes were equally represented by acyl chain lengths of C16 and C18; in CLs, however, C18 comprised more than 95% of the acyl chains (S2C–S2E Fig). PCs were primarily composed of saturated fatty acids, PGs had similar monounsaturated and saturated fatty acyl chains (~43% and 50%, respectively), while 80% of CL fatty acyl chains contained two double bonds (S2C–S2E Fig). Acyl chain length and degree of saturation for PC, PG, and CL species were not different in Abhd2KO mice. Taken together, these results suggest that ABHD2 is not involved in specific alteration of the acyl chain composition of phospholipids.

Physiological characterization of Abhd2KO mice

While the increase in hepatic phospholipids we observed in the Abhd2KO mouse confirms the predictions from the genetic screen that Abhd2 is a negative driver of these lipids, it does not inform us about the physiological role of ABHD2. To gain a better understanding of this, we performed a series of physiological measurements in WT and Abhd2KO mice.

WT and Abhd2KO mice demonstrated similar growth curves (S3A and S3E Fig) and comparable fasting glucose, insulin, and triglyceride (TG) profiles (S3B–S3D and S3F–S3H Fig). At ~24 weeks of age, body weight did not differ among female mice (WT 32 ± 1g vs. Abhd2KO 36 ± 12g, S4A Fig); however, Abhd2KO females showed greater fat mass (S4B Fig), greater fat mass percentage (S4C Fig) and decreased lean mass percentage (S4E Fig). Male mice did not differ in body weights or body composition (S4F–S4J Fig).

To evaluate a role for Abhd2 deletion on broad metabolic pathways, we performed an oral glucose tolerance test (oGTT) to assess whole-body insulin signaling and glucose homeostasis, a β3-adrenergic receptor agonist tolerance test (β3TT) to examine differences in adipose lipolysis and glucose metabolism, and a fast/re-feed (FRF) paradigm to probe liver lipolysis/lipogenesis pathways.

During the oGTT, no differences in plasma glucose, insulin, or C-peptide levels were observed for male or female WT vs Abhd2KO mice (S5 Fig). Administration of CL-316,243 (a β3-adrenergic receptor agonist) resulted in a marginal increase in plasma glucose in male Abhd2KO mice during the β3TT (S6 Fig). However, area under the curve (AUC) for glucose, insulin, free fatty acids, and glycerol were all unchanged in Abhd2KO mice (S6 Fig). Similarly, circulating fatty acids were not different for WT vs. Abhd2KO mice during the fast/re-feed paradigm (S7 Fig). Another member of the ABHD family of enzymes, ABHD6, has been shown to have a direct effect on islet insulin secretion by hydrolyzing monacylglycerols, inhibiting MUNC13-1 action and thereby regulating insulin granule release [20]. To directly evaluate the effect of ABHD2 on pancreatic β-cell function, we determined insulin secretion from cultured islets isolated from WT and Abhd2KO mice. Insulin secretion in response to varying glucose concentrations or monoacylglycerol (2-arachidonoylglycerol or 1-palmitoylglycerol) was the same for WT and Abhd2KO mice (S8 Fig).

Given that hepatic phospholipids have been shown to play a major role in lipoprotein metabolism and cholesterol homeostasis [3033], we measured circulating total cholesterol and triglycerides (TG) in WT and Abhd2KO mice. Total cholesterol and TG were not different in Abhd2KO mice (S9A and S9B Fig). To assess whole-body cholesterol metabolism, we measured biliary and hepatic cholesterol content. These remained unchanged in Abhd2KO mice (S9C Fig). Hepatic cholesterol levels showed a marginal increase in male, but not female Abhd2KO mice (S9D Fig).

To assess lipoprotein classes (e.g., LDL, HDL), we performed fast protein liquid chromatography (FPLC) on plasma from WT and Abhd2KO mice. Cholesterol in the individual FPLC fractions did not differ between genotypes of females (S9E Fig) or males (S9F Fig). No differences were detected for total cholesterol across the lipoprotein fractions for WT vs. Abhd2KO mice (S9G Fig).

Given the marginal increase in hepatic cholesterol levels in male Abhd2KO mice (S9D Fig), we evaluated hepatic LDL receptor (LDLR) protein levels by western blot analysis. LDLR protein was not different between female (S9H Fig) or male (S9I Fig) WT and Abhd2KO mice (S9J Fig). Taken together, while our data supports Abhd2 as a driver of several hepatic phospholipid and cardiolipin (in male) species, we were unable to link these changes to differences in serum lipoproteins, suggesting that the role of ABHD2 in phospholipid metabolism is confined to intracellular lipids.

Discussion

Genetic diversity plays a pivotal role in lipid metabolism and homeostasis. By leveraging genetic diversity of murine populations, it is possible to define novel drivers of physiological traits, including lipid classes.

Through untargeted MS-based lipidomics in the context of a genetic screen, our study is the first to nominate and validate Abhd2 as a genetic driver of hepatic phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylethanolamine. Phospholipid species (PC and PE) that mapped to chromosome 7 were increased in livers of knockout mice (both sexes), following the substrate signature prediction of our genetic screen. By integrating lipidomics and transcriptomics, we show how a mouse genetic screen can be used to identify novel drivers of hepatic lipids.

Abhd2 has been previously characterized as a monoacylglycerol lipase with potent effects on male fertility [24] and ovulation in female mice [23]. In sperm, ABHD2 is activated by progesterone and cleaves monoacylglycerols (1-arachadonoylglycerol and 2-arachadonoylglycerol) to remove the inhibition of the CatSper calcium channel, thereby allowing for sperm activation. In a gene-trap mouse model of age-related emphysema, loss of Abhd2 resulted in decreased PC levels in bronchoalveolar lavage [34]. These Abhd2-deficient mice had increased lung macrophage infiltration and inflammatory markers and spontaneously developed emphysema with aging. It is interesting that their study showed a decrease in PC lipids with loss of Abhd2, whereas PCs increased in livers of our whole-body Abhd2KO mice, perhaps highlighting tissue-specific roles of ABHD2. Nevertheless, Abhd2 appears to have a causative role in PC species homeostasis. Our study is the first to demonstrate an in vivo role for Abhd2 in phospholipid regulation in non-reproductive tissues.

An unexpected finding was a decrease in cardiolipins and phosphatidylglycerols in male Abhd2KO mice. Cardiolipins comprise ~20% of the inner mitochondrial membrane, whereas phosphatidylglycerols reside in the outer mitochondrial membrane [26]. To explore a genetic association between PC and CL or PG, we performed QTL analyses in which the PC lipid showing strongest association to the Abhd2 gene locus (PC-20.4/22.6) was used as an additive covariate when mapping CL or PG. This QTL analysis yielded an intriguing result: CL and PG acquired QTL at the Abhd2 locus with an inverted allele signature to that for the PC. This inverted allele signature is also indicative of a substrate signature, where an increase in PC is associated with a decrease in PG and CL. Thus, ABHD2, through its effect on PC, may indirectly play a role in the synthesis of CL species.

One hypothesis for ABHD2’s effect on CL biosynthesis is through the role of an acyltransferase. ABHD2 contains two enzymatic motifs: the canonical serine hydrolase motif and the highly conserved HxxxxD acyltransferase motif between H120 and D125. Synthesis of CL involves a transfer of a fatty acyl chain from PC or PE phospholipids to monolysocardiolipin (MLCL) to form mature CL species. Four MLCL species were detected in our liver samples (S3 Table). In males, there was a 2.5-fold reduction in one MLCL species (MLCL-56:6) in Abhd2KO mice. If ABHD2 affected mature CL synthesis through a direct fatty acyl chain transfer to MLCL, an increase in MLCL species would be expected. Therefore, the reduction in MLCL indicates ABHD2’s role is likely upstream of mature CL synthesis. Since PG is also required for CL synthesis, it’s also possible that the reduction in CL concentrations is secondary to alterations in PG concentrations [25]. In our initial QTL analyses of all liver lipids, we identified a CL hotspot on chromosome 3 at ~46 Mbp, which includes the ABHD enzyme, Abhd18. Recently, ABHD18 was shown to reside in the mitochondria [27]; however, its mechanism has not been well characterized. In the STRING protein-protein association network database (string-db.org), ABHD2 and ABHD18 are predicted to have an interaction, although this has not been experimentally validated [35]. It is possible that ABHD2 mediates utilization of PC or its acyl chains in the synthesis of CL and PG, or that it interacts with another mitochondrial enzyme, such as ABHD18, to effect these changes.

It is important to note that changes to mitochondrial lipids were only observed in male Abhd2KO mice, whereas the increase in PC and PE phospholipids occurred in both sexes. Progesterone-induced activation of ABHD2 is required for its lipid cleavage function and regulating ovulation in females [23, 24]; however, the effect of male sex hormones on ABHD2 has not been demonstrated. In a study of cerebral cortex development, a perinatal testosterone spike in male mice drove mitochondrial lipid composition and maturation [36]. It is possible that ABHD2 is required for testosterone-dependent regulation of mitochondrial lipid synthesis or maturation.

Reduced abundance of PG and CL lipids may indicate a reduction in total mitochondrial number or a defect in the inner mitochondrial membrane leading to altered metabolic function. As a surrogate for mitochondrial number, we measured expression of key mitochondrial genes by qPCR but did not see a sex-specific or genotype effect. Thus, the decrease in CL and PG does not appear to be due to a reduction in mitochondrial number but does not rule out altered mitochondrial function in liver from Abhd2KO mice.

The monoacylglycerol lipase, Abhd6, has also been shown to modulate mitochondrial lipid metabolism [37, 38]. However, the changes in lipid class concentrations were in the opposite direction of the Abhd2 lipids. Loss of Abhd6 results in an increase in liver PG, which was attributed to defective degradation of lysophosphatidylglycerol (LPG) [37]. Another group later showed increased plasma concentrations of bis(monoacylglycerol)phosphate (BMP) in mice lacking Abhd6 and in humans with a loss-of-function mutation in ABHD6 [38]. Both BMP and CL synthesis require PG as a precursor [39]; therefore, it is possible that the reduction of PG and CL content in the Abhd2KO livers may reflect alterations in one or both of these pathways. Recently, the Abhd2 locus was linked to age-related macular degeneration (AMD) through a human GWAS of mitochondrial variants [40]. Alterations to mitochondrial function and lipid oxidation have been implicated in AMD disease progression [41, 42]. We did not assess phenotypes related to vision; however, it would be intriguing to determine a role for Abhd2 in mitochondrial function and AMD disease risk. We observed a reduction in CL in livers of Abhd2KO mice; thus, we are tempted to speculate that Abhd2 deficiency may contribute to macular degeneration through its effects on CL.

Loss of Abhd2 has been previously shown to regulate vascular smooth muscle migration and induce blood vessel intima hyperplasia after a cuff experiment in a mouse model [43]. The same group showed an increase in macrophage ABHD2 expression abundance in vulnerable plaques in humans [44] but no mechanism of action was determined.

In human genome-wide association studies [45], there is a significant region on chromosome 15 associated with coronary artery disease (CAD). This locus sits between two genes: ABHD2 and MFGE8. Soubeyrand et al. showed that deletion of the intergenic locus results in a marked increase in MFGE8 expression but did not affect the expression of ABHD2 [46]. Knockdown of MFGE8 in coronary smooth muscle cell and monocytes inhibited proliferation, indicating MFGE8 as the causal gene for CAD-associated at this locus [46]. Splice variants of MFGE8 have been associated with reduced risk of atherosclerosis in FinnGen, a large Finnish biobank study [47]. However, an in vivo role for MFGE8 has not been established. In our genetic screen, hepatic expression of Mfge8 did not significantly correlate with hepatic lipids or plasma lipoproteins. We did not observe a difference in plasma lipoproteins with Abhd2 deletion. We did not assess any indicators of vascular smooth muscle physiology or blood pressure. Thus, ABHD2 is likely not the causative gene at the CAD-associated region on chromosome 15 in human GWAS.

All studies were completed in whole-body knockout mice, allowing us to definitively identify Abhd2 as the driver of the observed phenotypes. For this reason, one limitation of our study is that we cannot speak to tissue-specific roles of Abhd2 on metabolic stress and disease risk. It will be important for future studies to carefully consider tissue-specific knockout models to further refine our understanding of Abhd2’s role in physiology. Similarly, we did not assess effects of Abhd2 at the subcellular level. Disruptions in phospholipid homeostasis could lead to subcellular dysfunction, such as those seen in lysosomal storage disorders (LSD). We did not observe sphingomyelin or cholesterol accumulation in liver nor evidence of muscle wasting, which are often hallmarks of LSD. However, we did not perform microscopy of lysosomes to directly assess alterations to morphological features and our untargeted lipidomics did not annotate bis(monoacylglycerol)phosphates, the key lipids of lysosomes. Additionally, we did not expand on ABHD2’s known mechanisms, namely that it operates as a lipase to cleave monoacylglycerols [24] and also contains an acyltransferase motif [15]. Instead, we identified new substrates for ABHD2 and its potential roles in phospholipid homeostasis.

With biochemical approaches alone, it is challenging to discover novel candidate substrates for known enzymes. Through integration of gene expression data with untargeted, mass-spectrometry lipidomics, we identified a hepatic phospholipid hotspot on chromosome 7 and nominated Abhd2 as a novel driver of PC, PE, and cardiolipin. Using a whole-body knockout mouse model, we validated Abhd2 as the causative gene for several PC and PE lipids, and CLs, precisely as predicted by the QTL analysis. Our study demonstrates the power of metabolite QTL analysis to discover novel candidate substrates for enzymes.

Methods

Ethics statement

All animal work was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at University of Wisconsin-Madison under protocol #A005821.

Mouse genetic screen to nominate novel drivers of hepatic lipid metabolism

Details of the mouse genetic screen has been previously described [22]. Briefly, 500 Diversity Outbred (DO) mice were obtained from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME) and maintained on a high-fat, high-sucrose diet (TD.08811, Envigo, Madison, WI) for 16 weeks. For this study, livers from 384 mice (191 female, 193 male) were collected for transcriptomics and untargeted mass spectrometry-based lipidomics. Mapping of gene expression and phenotypes were performed to identify quantitative trait loci (QTL) and nominate candidate drivers for individual lipid species using the GRCm38 genome build and Ensembl 75 for gene annotation. Genome scans were completed with R/qtl2 software [48], using sex and wave as additive covariates. To investigate genetic associations between mitochondrial lipid classes and phosphatidylcholines mapping to chromosome 7, genome QTL scans were performed with sex, wave, and PC-20:4/22:6 as additive covariates. A logarithm of odds (LOD) greater than 6.0 was used as the threshold for identifying suggestive QTL and LOD greater than 7.5 identified significant QTL. As previously described, LOD thresholds were defined through permutation testing to establish a genome-wide family-wide error rate (FWER) for genome-wide QTL [14, 49]. Mediation analysis to establish causality was performed by regression of the target phenotype on the locus genotype to establish the direct genetic effect [50]. Next, we included the candidate gene expression as a covariate in the regression. If the phenotype-genotype association was no longer significant in the conditional regression model, we considered the gene to be a mediator of the genetic effect on the target locus.

Abhd2 mouse housing and maintenance

Whole-body Abhd2 heterozygous mice, generated on a C57BL/6N background [23], were a kind gift of Dr. Polina Lishko at University of California–Berkley. All animal work was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at University of Wisconsin-Madison under protocol #A005821. Heterozygous mice were backcrossed with C57BL/6J mice and bred to produce knockout mice and wild-type littermate controls. All mice were housed at the University of Wisconsin–Madison animal facilities with standard 12-hour light/dark cycles. Animals were weaned and provided a high-fat, high-sucrose diet (TD.08811, Envigo, Madison, WI) and water ad libitum. At 23–25 weeks of age, mice were euthanized by carbon dioxide asphyxiation and exsanguinated by cardiac puncture. Whole blood was collected with EDTA, centrifuged at 10,000xg for 10 minutes at 4°C and plasma separated. Tissues were collected, snap frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80°C until assay.

in vivo physiologic measurements

At 6, 10 and 14 weeks of age, mice were fasted four hours and blood collected by retro-orbital bleed for measurement of plasma glucose (#23-666-286, FisherScientific), insulin (#SRI-13K, MilliporeSigma) and triglycerides (#TR22421, ThermoFisher). At age 16 weeks, mice were subjected to a 24-hour fast and 6-hour refeed to assess hepatic lipid storage during energy deficits. Body weights and whole blood were collected at 0, 24, and 30 hours and plasma measured for non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA) using the Wako Linearity Set (#999–34691, #995–34791, # 991–34891, # 993–35191, FisherScientific). in vivo insulin action was assessed at 18 weeks of age by an oral glucose tolerance test as previously described [22]. Mice were fasted for four hours and given a 2 g/kg BW glucose dose by oral gavage. Blood was collected by retroorbital eye bleed and assayed for glucose, insulin, and c-peptide concentrations. β3-adrenergic receptor agonist tolerance tests (β3TT) were performed at 20 weeks of age on four-hour fasted mice. Mice were dosed with 1 mg/kg BW of CL-316,243 by i.p. injection. Blood, collected by retroorbital eye bleed, was assayed for glucose, non-esterified fatty acids, glycerol, and insulin content.

Liver lipidomics

Frozen tissues were sectioned to 10mg on dry ice and added to phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and methanol containing internal stable isotope metabolomics standards (S6 Table). Tissues were mechanically homogenized (Qiagen TissueLyser) for 5 minutes at maximum frequency (30.0 Hz/s). 20μL of homogenate was removed for protein quantification (Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit). Samples were mixed with methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE), vortexed, centrifuged, and supernatant was transferred into new tube. Original samples were re-extracted with MTBE: Methanol: dd-H2O (10:3:2.5), vortexed, centrifuged, and supernatant was transferred into tubes containing the first extraction’s supernatant. Samples were evaporated in a speed-vac and then resuspended with isopropyl alcohol: acetonitrile: dd-H2O (8:2:2). Samples were then vortexed and centrifuged before transferring supernatant to glass vials (Agilent Technologies). Samples were analyzed by liquid chromatography- tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS) with a 6545 UPLC-QToF mass spectrometer for non-targeted lipidomics. Results from LC-MS experiments were collected using Agilent Mass Hunter Workstation and analyzed using the software package Agilent Mass Hunter Quant B.07.00. Lipid species were quantified based on exact mass and fragmentation patterns and verified by lipid standards. Mass spectrometry was performed at the Metabolomics Core Facility at the University of Utah. Mass spectrometry equipment was obtained through NCRR Shared Instrumentation Grant 1S10OD016232-01, 1S10OD018210-01A1 and 1S10OD021505-01.

Liver, bile, and plasma cholesterol

Total cholesterol in undiluted plasma and bile was assessed with Infinity Cholesterol reagent (TR13421, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA) and concentrations determined by a standard curve. Liver cholesterol was extracted by homogenizing 50 mg of tissue in a TissueLyser with 1 mL chloroform:isopropanol:IGEPAL CA-630 (7:11:0.1). The organic phase was collected and dried at 50°C. Dried lipids were resuspended in 200μL cholesterol assay buffer (MAK043, Millipore Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and total cholesterol determined following manufacturer’s protocol.

To analyze lipoprotein size distributions, plasma was analyzed using a Superose 6 10-300GL column and size-exclusion fast protein liquid chromatography (FPLC). Fractions were assayed for total cholesterol and triglycerides as previously described [51].

RT-PCR for mitochondrial genes

For mitochondrial gene analyses, DNA was isolated from liver samples (n = 5/sex/genotype) with an overnight incubation in proteinase K. Isolated DNA was dried and resuspended in ultrapure water for qPCR analysis. Mitochondrial gene expression (primers in S7 Table) were normalized to the nuclear cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance receptor (Cftr) and fold-change calculated using the 2-ΔΔCt method.

Western blot analysis

Tissues were lysed in RIPA buffer and total protein determined by Pierce BCA assay (#23225, ThermoFisher Scientific) to ensure equal loading. Samples (15–30 ug) were heat inactivated with 4X Laemmli dye containing 4% 2-mercaptoethanol at 70°C for 10 minutes and run on 7.5% tris-glycine gels following standard protocols. PVDF membranes were stained for total protein with 0.1% ponceau S in 5% acetic acid, and then probed for the protein of interest. For blotting of FPLC-separated plasma lipoprotein fractions, 25 μL of each fraction was incubated with 4X Laemmli dye containing 4% 2-mercaptoethanol at 70°C for 10 minutes and probed for protein as described above. Primary and secondary antibodies are listed in S8 Table.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analysis of in vivo mouse data and tissue assays were performed by ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc analysis. Lipidomics data were analyzed using MetaboAnalystR [52]: liver lipid concentrations (pmol lipid/mg liver) were log10-transformed, normalized by Pareto scaling, and then fold change calculated. Unless noted, data are presented as mean ± standard error. Differences were considered significant at p<0.05.

Statement of data availability

Raw data for Abhd2 expression in 500 DO and Abhd2KO mouse phenotyping data are provided as supporting information. DO liver lipidomic data has been previously published [14].

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Mediation analysis of phospholipid QTL identifies Abhd2 as candidate causal gene.

Mediation analysis of the QTL for seven liver lipids that map to the chromosome 7 locus resulted in substantial LOD drop when conditioned on hepatic Abhd2 expression. Conditioning on all other genes did not result in any appreciable LOD drop for these lipids.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Abhd2 deletion decreased hepatic phosphatidylglycerol concentrations but did not alter mitochondrial gene expression or mitochondrial lipid acyl chain compositions.

(A) Despite significant reductions in several cardiolipin species in male mice, total hepatic cardiolipin levels in male and female mice did not differ by genotype. However, total phosphatidylglycerol concentrations were decreased Abhd2KO mice compared to WT males (p<0.01). (B) Mitochondrial gene expression, measured as a proxy for mitochondrial number, was not different by sex or genotype. Neither genotype nor sex affected fatty acyl composition of PC, PG or CL in the livers of HF/HS-fed mice. (C) The hepatic phosphatidylcholine landscape was diverse and primarily comprised of acyl chains of C16 or C18 in length and were saturated or monounsaturated. (D) Phosphatidylglycerols were equally represented by fatty acyl lengths of C16 and C18 and contained 0 or 1 double bond. (E) Cardiolipins were highly represented by linoleate, with C18 being 95% of acyl lengths and 98% of CLs containing 1 or more double bonds.

(TIFF)

S3 Fig. Whole-body deletion of Abhd2 did not alter growth rates nor fasting blood profiles in C57BL/6J mice.

Abhd2KO female (A) and male (E) mice showed similar growth curves to WT mice. Fasting glucose (B, F), insulin (C, G), and triglycerides (D, H) did not differ by genotype.

(TIFF)

S4 Fig. Loss of Abhd2 altered body compositions of female mice by increasing fat mass as measured by DEXA.

Body compositions of mice were measured at ~24 weeks of age by DEXA. (A) Body mass of female mice were not significantly different. Fat mass, both as total weight (B) and %body weight (C) increased in Abhd2KO female mice. Lean mass weight (D) did not change with genotype in females, but lean mass as %body weight (E) was reduced in Abhd2KO female mice. Male mice were not different in total body weight, fat, nor lean mass (F-J). *p<0.05.

(TIFF)

S5 Fig. Assessment of insulin action by oral glucose tolerance test (oGTT) elicited similar responses between genotypes of the same sex.

(A) Female Abhd2KO mice showed a trend for increased plasma glucose at 15 and 30-minute timepoints during the oGTT. Male Abhd2KO mice were not different. (B) Area under the curve (AUC) for plasma glucose during the oGTT did not differ by genotype. (C) Plasma insulin response to glucose stimulation were the same for genotypes of each sex, with all mice returning to baseline within two hours of receiving the glucose bolus. (D) Insulin curve AUCs were not different. (E) C-peptide, a marker of insulin secretion, was the same for genotypes of each sex during the oGTT, with no difference in AUC (F). (G) The C-peptide/insulin ratio, used as a surrogate for insulin clearance, were not different at 0, 15, and 30 minutes. (H) AUCs for C-peptide/insulin ratio were similar between genotypes of the same sex.

(TIFF)

S6 Fig. β3-adregeneric receptor agonist stimulation failed to produce a physiologic response in Abhd2 KO mice.

Plasma glucose concentrations at various time points (A) and total AUC for glucose (B) during β3-adregeneric receptor agonist stimulation was not different in male or female Abhd2KO mice. Plasma insulin concentrations (C) and total AUC for insulin (D) during the B3TT were the same for genotypes of each sex. Non-esterified fatty acid (NEFA) concentration (E) and total AUC for NEFA (F), and glycerol concentration (G), and AUC for glycerol (H) during the β3TT did not different for Abhd2KO female or male mice.

(TIFF)

S7 Fig. Loss of Abhd2 does not alter the physiological response to prolonged fasting or refeeding.

Following a 24-hr fast, female mice averaged a 1.7 ± 0.9 gm weight loss and an average 1.1 ± 0.1 gm weight gain following the 6-hour refeed period and were not different for Abhd2KO versus WT mice (A). Plasma NEFAs, measured before and after prolonged fast, were similar between genotypes (B). Male mice lost 2.5 ± 0.2 gm with prolonged fasting and regained 0.6 ± 0.1 gm following refeeding and were not different between genotypes (C). Plasma NEFAs of male mice during the fast/refeed protocol did not differ by genotype (D).

(TIFF)

S8 Fig. Loss of Abhd2 did not alter insulin secretion in response to glucose or monoacylglycerol.

Insulin secretion in response to varying glucose concentration, or two different monoacyl-glycerols (2-AG or 1-PG) (A) and total islet insulin content (B) remained unchanged in cultured islets from female and male Abhd2KO versus WT mice.

(TIFF)

S9 Fig. Loss of Abhd2 exerts a subtle influence on whole-body cholesterol metabolism.

Total plasma cholesterol (A) and triglycerides (B), biliary cholesterol (C), and hepatic cholesterol (D) in female and male Abhd2KO versus WT mice. Male Abhd2KO mice showed a small increase in hepatic cholesterol (p = 0.06). Plasma cholesterol lipoproteins were separated by FPLC and assayed for cholesterol in female (E) and male (F) mice. Total AUC for cholesterol in all FPLC fractions (G). Liver from female (H) and male (I) mice were analyzed for LDL-receptor (LDLR) protein content by immunoblot. (J) Quantitation of LDLR protein abundance was not different between genotypes of the same sex.

(TIFF)

S1 Table. 73 protein-coding and non-coding genes are located within a 2Mbp region flanking liver lipid QTL.

(XLSX)

S2 Table. 37 lipid classes were detected by untargeted MS-based lipidomics in hepatic tissue of WT and Abhd2KO mice.

(XLSX)

S3 Table. 583 unique lipid species were detected in hepatic tissue of WT and Abhd2KO mice.

(XLSX)

S4 Table. QTL of mitochondrial lipids conditioned on sex and wave.

(XLSX)

S5 Table. QTL of mitochondrial lipids conditioned on sex, wave, and PC 20:4_22:6.

(XLSX)

S6 Table. Internal standard for mass spectrometry-based lipidomics.

(XLSX)

S7 Table. Primer sequences for RT-PCR.

(XLSX)

S8 Table. Antibodies and source for western blot analyses.

(XLSX)

S1 Rawdata. Raw data for Abhd2 expression in 500 DO and Abhd2KO mouse phenotyping data.

(ZIP)

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Polina Lishko, currently at Washington University in St. Louis, MO, for providing heterozygous Abhd2 mice. Lipidomic analysis of mouse liver tissue was performed at the Metabolomics Core Facility at the University of Utah. Mass spectrometry equipment was obtained through NCRR Shared Instrumentation Grant 1S10OD016232-01, 1S10OD018210-01A1 and 1S10OD021505-01. Additional support was provided by the Jackson Laboratory Cube Initiative.

Data Availability

Raw data for Abhd2 expression in DO mice and Abhd2KO mouse phenotyping data are provided as supporting information. Full DO liver untargeted lipidomic data has been previously published (https://www.nature.com/articles/s42255-020-00278-3).

Funding Statement

This work was supported by grants from the NIH (R01DK101573, R01DK102948, and RC2DK125961 (A.D.A.)) and by the University of Wisconsin–Madison, Department of Biochemistry and Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research and Graduate Education with funding from the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (M.P.K.). Research support to T.R.P. was provided through the NIH by the Training Program in Translational Cardiovascular Science (T32-HL007936) at UW Madison. Additional support was provided by the Jackson Laboratory Cube Initiative. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Bays HE, Toth PP, Kris-Etherton PM, Abate N, Aronne LJ, Brown WV, et al. Obesity, adiposity, and dyslipidemia: A consensus statement from the National Lipid Association. Journal of Clinical Lipidology. 2013;7(4):304–83. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2013.04.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Klop B, Elte JW, Cabezas MC. Dyslipidemia in obesity: mechanisms and potential targets. Nutrients. 2013;5(4):1218–40. Epub 20130412. doi: 10.3390/nu5041218 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3705344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lee S, Norheim F, Gulseth HL, Langleite TM, Aker A, Gundersen TE, et al. Skeletal muscle phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylethanolamine respond to exercise and influence insulin sensitivity in men. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):6531–. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24976-x . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.van der Veen JN, Kennelly JP, Wan S, Vance JE, Vance DE, Jacobs RL. The critical role of phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylethanolamine metabolism in health and disease. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)—Biomembranes. 2017;1859(9, Part B):1558–72. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2017.04.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Brown SA, Hutchinson R, Morrisett J, Boerwinkle E, Davis CE, Gotto AM, et al. Plasma lipid, lipoprotein cholesterol, and apoprotein distributions in selected US communities. The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Arteriosclerosis and Thrombosis: A Journal of Vascular Biology. 1993;13(8):1139–58. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.13.8.1139 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zietzer A, Düsing P, Reese L, Nickenig G, Jansen F. Ceramide Metabolism in Cardiovascular Disease: A Network With High Therapeutic Potential. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2022;42(10):1220–8. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.122.318048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Md Boer, Voshol PJ, Kuipers F, Havekes LM, Romijn JA. Hepatic Steatosis: A Mediator of the Metabolic Syndrome. Lessons From Animal Models. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2004;24(4):644–9. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000116217.57583.6e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ipsen DH, Lykkesfeldt J, Tveden-Nyborg P. Molecular mechanisms of hepatic lipid accumulation in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 2018;75(18):3313–27. doi: 10.1007/s00018-018-2860-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Fu S, Yang L, Li P, Hofmann O, Dicker L, Hide W, et al. Aberrant lipid metabolism disrupts calcium homeostasis causing liver endoplasmic reticulum stress in obesity. Nature. 2011;473(7348):528–31. doi: 10.1038/nature09968 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yore MM, Syed I, Moraes-Vieira PM, Zhang T, Herman MA, Homan EA, et al. Discovery of a class of endogenous mammalian lipids with anti-diabetic and anti-inflammatory effects. Cell. 2014;159(2):318–32. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.035 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Patel R, Santoro A, Hofer P, Tan D, Oberer M, Nelson AT, et al. ATGL is a biosynthetic enzyme for fatty acid esters of hydroxy fatty acids. Nature. 2022;606(7916):968–75. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04787-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tan D, Ertunc ME, Konduri S, Zhang J, Pinto AM, Chu Q, et al. Discovery of FAHFA-Containing Triacylglycerols and Their Metabolic Regulation. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2019;141(22):8798–806. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b00045 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Smith U, Kahn BB. Adipose tissue regulates insulin sensitivity: role of adipogenesis, de novo lipogenesis and novel lipids. Journal of Internal Medicine. 2016;280(5):465–75. doi: 10.1111/joim.12540 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Linke V, Overmyer KA, Miller IJ, Brademan DR, Hutchins PD, Trujillo EA, et al. A large-scale genome-lipid association map guides lipid identification. Nat Metab. 2020;2(10):1149–62. Epub 2020/09/21. doi: 10.1038/s42255-020-00278-3 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lord CC, Thomas G, Brown JM. Mammalian alpha beta hydrolase domain (ABHD) proteins: Lipid metabolizing enzymes at the interface of cell signaling and energy metabolism. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1831(4):792–802. Epub 2013/01/14. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2013.01.002 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bononi G, Tuccinardi T, Rizzolio F, Granchi C. α/β-Hydrolase Domain (ABHD) Inhibitors as New Potential Therapeutic Options against Lipid-Related Diseases. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2021;64(14):9759–85. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c00624 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Poursharifi P, Attané C, Mugabo Y, Al-Mass A, Ghosh A, Schmitt C, et al. Adipose ABHD6 regulates tolerance to cold and thermogenic programs. JCI Insight. 2020. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.140294 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Poursharifi P, Madiraju SRM, Prentki M. Monoacylglycerol signalling and ABHD6 in health and disease. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism. 2017;19(S1):76–89. doi: 10.1111/dom.13008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zhao S, Poursharifi P, Mugabo Y, Levens EJ, Vivot K, Attane C, et al. α/β-Hydrolase domain-6 and saturated long chain monoacylglycerol regulate insulin secretion promoted by both fuel and non-fuel stimuli. Mol Metab. 2015;4(12):940–50. Epub 2016/02/26. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2015.09.012 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4731734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zhao S, Mugabo Y, Iglesias J, Xie L, Delghingaro-Augusto V, Lussier R, et al. α/β-Hydrolase Domain-6-Accessible Monoacylglycerol Controls Glucose-Stimulated Insulin Secretion. Cell Metabolism. 2014;19(6):993–1007. 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Long JZ, Cisar JS, Milliken D, Niessen S, Wang C, Trauger SA, et al. Metabolomics annotates ABHD3 as a physiologic regulator of medium-chain phospholipids. Nature Chemical Biology. 2011;7(11):763–5. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.659 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Keller MP, Rabaglia ME, Schueler KL, Stapleton DS, Gatti DM, Vincent M, et al. Gene loci associated with insulin secretion in islets from nondiabetic mice. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2019;129(10):4419–32. doi: 10.1172/JCI129143 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Björkgren I, Chung DH, Mendoza S, Gabelev-Khasin L, Petersen NT, Modzelewski A, et al. Alpha/Beta Hydrolase Domain-Containing Protein 2 Regulates the Rhythm of Follicular Maturation and Estrous Stages of the Female Reproductive Cycle. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology. 2021;9. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.710864 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Miller MR, Mannowetz N, Iavarone AT, Safavi R, Gracheva EO, Smith JF, et al. Unconventional endocannabinoid signaling governs sperm activation via the sex hormone progesterone. Science. 2016;352(6285):555–9. doi: 10.1126/science.aad6887 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Horvath SE, Daum G. Lipids of mitochondria. Progress in Lipid Research. 2013;52(4):590–614. doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2013.07.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Paradies G, Paradies V, Ruggiero FM, Petrosillo G. Role of Cardiolipin in Mitochondrial Function and Dynamics in Health and Disease: Molecular and Pharmacological Aspects. Cells. 2019;8(7). Epub 20190716. doi: 10.3390/cells8070728 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6678812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Morgenstern M, Peikert CD, Lübbert P, Suppanz I, Klemm C, Alka O, et al. Quantitative high-confidence human mitochondrial proteome and its dynamics in cellular context. Cell Metabolism. 2021;33(12):2464–83.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2021.11.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Jain R, Wade G, Ong I, Chaurasia B, Simcox J. Determination of tissue contributions to the circulating lipid pool in cold exposure via systematic assessment of lipid profiles. J Lipid Res. 2022;63(7):100197. doi: 10.1016/j.jlr.2022.100197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Leamy AK, Egnatchik RA, Shiota M, Ivanova PT, Myers DS, Brown HA, et al. Enhanced synthesis of saturated phospholipids is associated with ER stress and lipotoxicity in palmitate treated hepatic cells [S]. J Lipid Res. 2014;55(7):1478–88. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M050237 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Smit JJM, Schinkel AH, Elferink RPJO, Groen AK, Wagenaar E, van Deemter L, et al. Homozygous disruption of the murine MDR2 P-glycoprotein gene leads to a complete absence of phospholipid from bile and to liver disease. Cell. 1993;75(3):451–62. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90380-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Camont L, Lhomme M, Rached F, Goff WL, Nègre-Salvayre A, Salvayre R, et al. Small, Dense High-Density Lipoprotein-3 Particles Are Enriched in Negatively Charged Phospholipids Relevance to Cellular Cholesterol Efflux, Antioxidative, Antithrombotic, Anti-Inflammatory, and Antiapoptotic Functionalities. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2013;33(12):2715–23. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.113.301468 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Nam M, Choi M-S, Jung S, Jung Y, Choi J-Y, Ryu DH, et al. Lipidomic Profiling of Liver Tissue from Obesity-Prone and Obesity-Resistant Mice Fed a High Fat Diet. Sci Rep. 2015;5:16984–. doi: 10.1038/srep16984 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Robins SJ, Fasulo JM, Robins VF, Patton GM. Utilization of different fatty acids for hepatic and biliary phosphatidylcholine formation and the effect of changes in phosphatidylcholine molecular species on biliary lipid secretion. J Lipid Res. 1991;32(6):985–92. 10.1016/S0022-2275(20)41995-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Jin S, Zhao G, Li Z, Nishimoto Y, Isohama Y, Shen J, et al. Age-related pulmonary emphysema in mice lacking α/β hydrolase domain containing 2 gene. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2009;380(2):419–24. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.01.098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Szklarczyk D, Gable AL, Lyon D, Junge A, Wyder S, Huerta-Cepas J, et al. STRING v11: protein–protein association networks with increased coverage, supporting functional discovery in genome-wide experimental datasets. Nucleic Acids Research. 2018;47(D1):D607–D13. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1131 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Acaz-Fonseca E, Ortiz-Rodriguez A, Lopez-Rodriguez AB, Garcia-Segura LM, Astiz M. Developmental Sex Differences in the Metabolism of Cardiolipin in Mouse Cerebral Cortex Mitochondria. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):43878. doi: 10.1038/srep43878 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Thomas G, Betters JL, Lord CC, Brown AL, Marshall S, Ferguson D, et al. The serine hydrolase ABHD6 Is a critical regulator of the metabolic syndrome. Cell Rep. 2013;5(2):508–20. Epub 20131003. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.08.047 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3833083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Grabner GF, Fawzy N, Pribasnig MA, Trieb M, Taschler U, Holzer M, et al. Metabolic disease and ABHD6 alter the circulating bis(monoacylglycerol)phosphate profile in mice and humans. J Lipid Res. 2019;60(5):1020–31. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M093351 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Scherer M, Schmitz G. Metabolism, function and mass spectrometric analysis of bis(monoacylglycero)phosphate and cardiolipin. Chemistry and Physics of Lipids. 2011;164(6):556–62. doi: 10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2011.06.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Persad PJ, Heid IM, Weeks DE, Baird PN, de Jong EK, Haines JL, et al. Joint Analysis of Nuclear and Mitochondrial Variants in Age-Related Macular Degeneration Identifies Novel Loci TRPM1 and ABHD2/RLBP1. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017;58(10):4027–38. doi: 10.1167/iovs.17-21734 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Riazi-Esfahani M, Kuppermann BD, Kenney MC. The Role of Mitochondria in AMD: Current Knowledge and Future Applications. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2017;12(4):424–8. doi: 10.4103/jovr.jovr_182_17 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5644411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ferrington DA, Fisher CR, Kowluru RA. Mitochondrial Defects Drive Degenerative Retinal Diseases. Trends Mol Med. 2020;26(1):105–18. Epub 20191123. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2019.10.008 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6938541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Miyata K, Oike Y, Hoshii T, Maekawa H, Ogawa H, Suda T, et al. Increase of smooth muscle cell migration and of intimal hyperplasia in mice lacking the α/β hydrolase domain containing 2 gene. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2005;329(1):296–304. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.01.127 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Miyata K, Nakayama M, Mizuta S, Hokimoto S, Sugamura K, Oshima S, et al. Elevated mature macrophage expression of human ABHD2 gene in vulnerable plaque. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2008;365(2):207–13. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.10.127 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Type 2 Diabetes Knowledge Portal [Internet]. August 13, 2020. [cited August 13, 2020]. Available from: http://www.type2diabetesgenetics.org/gene/geneInfo/abhd2. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Soubeyrand S, Nikpay M, Turner A, Dang AT, Herfkens M, Lau P, et al. Regulation of MFGE8 by the intergenic coronary artery disease locus on 15q26.1. Atherosclerosis. 2019;284:11–7. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2019.02.012 WOS:000466155400002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ruotsalainen SE, Surakka I, Mars N, Karjalainen J, Kurki M, Kanai M, et al. Inframe insertion and splice site variants in MFGE8 associate with protection against coronary atherosclerosis. Communications Biology. 2022;5(1):802. doi: 10.1038/s42003-022-03552-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Broman KW, Gatti DM, Simecek P, Furlotte NA, Prins P, Sen Ś, et al. R/qtl2: Software for Mapping Quantitative Trait Loci with High-Dimensional Data and Multiparent Populations. Genetics. 2019;211(2):495–502. doi: 10.1534/genetics.118.301595 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Churchill GA, Doerge RW. Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics. 1994;138(3):963–71. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.3.963 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Neto EC, Broman AT, Keller MP, Attie AD, Zhang B, Zhu J, et al. Modeling Causality for Pairs of Phenotypes in System Genetics. Genetics. 2013;193(3):1003–13. doi: 10.1534/genetics.112.147124 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Li Z, Votava JA, Zajac GJM, Nguyen JN, Leyva Jaimes FB, Ly SM, et al. Integrating Mouse and Human Genetic Data to Move beyond GWAS and Identify Causal Genes in Cholesterol Metabolism. Cell Metabolism. 2020;31(4):741–54.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.02.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Chong J, Xia J. MetaboAnalystR: an R package for flexible and reproducible analysis of metabolomics data. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(24):4313–4. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty528 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Scott M Williams, David A Buchner

30 Apr 2023

Dear Dr Attie,

Thank you very much for submitting your Research Article entitled 'Lipidomic QTL in Diversity Outbred mice identifies a novel function for α/β hydrolase domain 2 (Abhd2) as an enzyme that metabolizes phosphatidylcholine and cardiolipin' to PLOS Genetics.

The manuscript was fully evaluated at the editorial level and by independent peer reviewers. The reviewers appreciated the attention to an important topic but identified some concerns that we ask you address in a revised manuscript.

We therefore ask you to modify the manuscript according to the review recommendations. Your revisions should address the specific points made by each reviewer.

In addition we ask that you:

1) Provide a detailed list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript.

2) Upload a Striking Image with a corresponding caption to accompany your manuscript if one is available (either a new image or an existing one from within your manuscript). If this image is judged to be suitable, it may be featured on our website. Images should ideally be high resolution, eye-catching, single panel square images. For examples, please browse our archive. If your image is from someone other than yourself, please ensure that the artist has read and agreed to the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution License. Note: we cannot publish copyrighted images.

We hope to receive your revised manuscript within the next 30 days. If you anticipate any delay in its return, we would ask you to let us know the expected resubmission date by email to plosgenetics@plos.org.

If present, accompanying reviewer attachments should be included with this email; please notify the journal office if any appear to be missing. They will also be available for download from the link below. You can use this link to log into the system when you are ready to submit a revised version, having first consulted our Submission Checklist.

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Please be aware that our data availability policy requires that all numerical data underlying graphs or summary statistics are included with the submission, and you will need to provide this upon resubmission if not already present. In addition, we do not permit the inclusion of phrases such as "data not shown" or "unpublished results" in manuscripts. All points should be backed up by data provided with the submission.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

PLOS has incorporated Similarity Check, powered by iThenticate, into its journal-wide submission system in order to screen submitted content for originality before publication. Each PLOS journal undertakes screening on a proportion of submitted articles. You will be contacted if needed following the screening process.

To resubmit, you will need to go to the link below and 'Revise Submission' in the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder.

Please let us know if you have any questions while making these revisions.

Yours sincerely,

David A. Buchner, PhD

Guest Editor

PLOS Genetics

Scott Williams

Section Editor

PLOS Genetics

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Authors:

Please note here if the review is uploaded as an attachment.

Reviewer #1: This study by Price et al identifies Abhd2 as a susceptibility gene for phospholipid metabolism in the liver of mice via QTL analysis, which is subsequently validated by findings in a Abhd2 mouse model. This is a relatively straightforward paper with logical progression of hypothesis and analysis. The mass spectrometry based lipidomics for a large cohort is striking and the role of Abhd2 in modulating phospholipid is well demonstrated. However, a few concerns or suggestions are noted to improve the rigor of the results and conclusions.

1) LOD threshold: Permutation tests are generally performed to determine the threshold for significant or suggestive linkage, especially when multiple covariates (sex, wave, and PC-20:4/22:6) are included. In the current study, the LOD score threshold for QTL identification was arbitrarily set at 6. Is this threshold for significant or suggestive linkage?

2) Mediation analysis to infer causality: It is stated “Mediation analysis to establish causality was performed using conditional regression of the target phenotype on gene expression of candidate gene and the locus genotype”, but results after adjustment with “the locus genotype” have not shown.

3) The genetic background of Abhd2 knockout mice was not provided.

4) Plasma cholesterol was measured, but why not phospholipids?

5) The method for measuring mitochondrial lipids should be provided.

Reviewer #2: This study demonstrates a thorough investigation of the role of Abhd2 in hepatic phospholipid regulation using a combination of genetic association, gene expression, lipidomics, and validation experiments.

I have minor comments:

1. The study could benefit from a more detailed discussion of the limitations, such as the lack of mechanistic insight into how Abhd2 regulates phospholipid levels and the need for further investigation into tissue-specific roles of Abhd2 in lipid metabolism.

2. Given that Abhd2 has been identified as a candidate gene in human GWAS studies (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas/genes/ABHD2) for lipid-related diseases, such as age-related macular degeneration (as reported in the paper by Persad et al., 2017), it would be valuable for the authors to discuss the potential relevance of their findings to these diseases.

Persad PJ, Heid IM, Weeks DE, Baird PN, de Jong EK, Haines JL, Pericak-Vance MA, Scott WK; International Age-Related Macular Degeneration Genomics Consortium (IAMDGC). Joint Analysis of Nuclear and Mitochondrial Variants in Age-Related Macular Degeneration Identifies Novel Loci TRPM1 and ABHD2/RLBP1. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017 Aug 1;58(10):4027-4038. doi: 10.1167/iovs.17-21734. PMID: 28813576; PMCID: PMC5559178.

3. Consider mentioning the mouse reference genome build used in the study to ensure reproducibility and clarity for future research.

4. I suggest including more details about how the threshold for significance was determined for R/QTL2 analysis. This could include information about the rationale behind the choice of a LOD score greater than 6.0 as the threshold for identifying a QTL

Reviewer #3: The manuscript by Price and colleagues integrates genomic association with expression data leading to the identification of Abhd2 as a driver of hepatic phospholipid phenotypes in mice.

Figure 1B: It will facilitate the understanding of the readers if the authors write the genotypes of the alleles versus Abhd2 mRNA and phospholipid levels.

Line 124, can the authors include a sentence about the significance of the observation. Something like “genetic architecture, suggesting that Abhd2 could participate in PCs degradation”.

Line 132: Please explain what mediation analysis is. This will facilitate the understanding of the readers.

Figure 2 could be supplementary. It supports the findings observed in Fig 1.

Figure 3: Lipidomics in Abhd2 ko

In what genetic background is the Abdh2 ko, and how is Abhd2 expressed in this strain? This aspect is relevant because the consequences of its deletion could be different if it is in a highly expressed tissue or a low expression tissue.

In what subcellular compartments are these lipids stored? Do the Abhd2 ko show features of a Lysosomal Storage Disorder (LSD)? Could Abhd2 be a modifier gene of phospholipidosis? Can the authors show electron microscopy images of the tissues or discuss this point?

Gene expression of mitochondrial genes does not say anything about its functionality. Can the authors show any functional data of the mitochondria?

Can the authors expand the discussion about the sex-specific lipid changes in the Abdh2 ko? Does the Abdh2 promotor has an estrogen-responding element? What is the sex of the animals where the initial screening was performed?

Figure 4:

Figure 1B: it is difficult to interpret the results how they are currently plotted. Can the authors show the correlations between the gene expression of Abh2 and Abh18 genes across the different DO parental strains? Do Abh2 and Abh18 co-localized? Please show a confocal image to support that they could be working together. Is any data predicting their physical interactions?

In vivo physiological measurements:

Did the authors measure liver function tests, such as alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), among others?

**********

Have all data underlying the figures and results presented in the manuscript been provided?

Large-scale datasets should be made available via a public repository as described in the PLOS Genetics data availability policy, and numerical data that underlies graphs or summary statistics should be provided in spreadsheet form as supporting information.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: Yes: Andres D. Klein

Attachment

Submitted filename: Reviewers_Plos Genet.docx

Decision Letter 1

Scott M Williams, David A Buchner

3 Jul 2023

Dear Dr Attie,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript entitled "Lipidomic QTL in Diversity Outbred mice identifies a novel function for α/β hydrolase domain 2 (Abhd2) as an enzyme that metabolizes phosphatidylcholine and cardiolipin" has been editorially accepted for publication in PLOS Genetics. Congratulations!

Before your submission can be formally accepted and sent to production you will need to complete our formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. Please be aware that it may take several days for you to receive this email; during this time no action is required by you. Please note: the accept date on your published article will reflect the date of this provisional acceptance, but your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until the required changes have been made.

Once your paper is formally accepted, an uncorrected proof of your manuscript will be published online ahead of the final version, unless you’ve already opted out via the online submission form. If, for any reason, you do not want an earlier version of your manuscript published online or are unsure if you have already indicated as such, please let the journal staff know immediately at plosgenetics@plos.org.

In the meantime, please log into Editorial Manager at https://www.editorialmanager.com/pgenetics/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information to ensure an efficient production and billing process. Note that PLOS requires an ORCID iD for all corresponding authors. Therefore, please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field.  This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager.

If you have a press-related query, or would like to know about making your underlying data available (as you will be aware, this is required for publication), please see the end of this email. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming article at this point, to enable them to help maximise its impact. Inform journal staff as soon as possible if you are preparing a press release for your article and need a publication date.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Genetics!

Yours sincerely,

David A. Buchner, PhD

Guest Editor

PLOS Genetics

Scott Williams

Section Editor

PLOS Genetics

www.plosgenetics.org

Twitter: @PLOSGenetics

----------------------------------------------------

Comments from the reviewers (if applicable):

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Authors:

Please note here if the review is uploaded as an attachment.

Reviewer #1: The authors have adequately addressed my concerns.

Reviewer #2: The authors have adequately addressed all my previous comments in the revised manuscript. I have no further comments or suggestions.

Reviewer #3: well done

**********

Have all data underlying the figures and results presented in the manuscript been provided?

Large-scale datasets should be made available via a public repository as described in the PLOS Genetics data availability policy, and numerical data that underlies graphs or summary statistics should be provided in spreadsheet form as supporting information.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: Yes: Andrés D Klein

----------------------------------------------------

Data Deposition

If you have submitted a Research Article or Front Matter that has associated data that are not suitable for deposition in a subject-specific public repository (such as GenBank or ArrayExpress), one way to make that data available is to deposit it in the Dryad Digital Repository. As you may recall, we ask all authors to agree to make data available; this is one way to achieve that. A full list of recommended repositories can be found on our website.

The following link will take you to the Dryad record for your article, so you won't have to re‐enter its bibliographic information, and can upload your files directly: 

http://datadryad.org/submit?journalID=pgenetics&manu=PGENETICS-D-23-00321R1

More information about depositing data in Dryad is available at http://www.datadryad.org/depositing. If you experience any difficulties in submitting your data, please contact help@datadryad.org for support.

Additionally, please be aware that our data availability policy requires that all numerical data underlying display items are included with the submission, and you will need to provide this before we can formally accept your manuscript, if not already present.

----------------------------------------------------

Press Queries

If you or your institution will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, or if you need to know your paper's publication date for media purposes, please inform the journal staff as soon as possible so that your submission can be scheduled accordingly. Your manuscript will remain under a strict press embargo until the publication date and time. This means an early version of your manuscript will not be published ahead of your final version. PLOS Genetics may also choose to issue a press release for your article. If there's anything the journal should know or you'd like more information, please get in touch via plosgenetics@plos.org.

Acceptance letter

Scott M Williams, David A Buchner

26 Jul 2023

PGENETICS-D-23-00321R1

Lipidomic QTL in Diversity Outbred mice identifies a novel function for α/β hydrolase domain 2 (Abhd2) as an enzyme that metabolizes phosphatidylcholine and cardiolipin

Dear Dr Attie,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript entitled "Lipidomic QTL in Diversity Outbred mice identifies a novel function for α/β hydrolase domain 2 (Abhd2) as an enzyme that metabolizes phosphatidylcholine and cardiolipin" has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Genetics! Your manuscript is now with our production department and you will be notified of the publication date in due course.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, unless you have opted out or your manuscript is a front-matter piece, the early version of your manuscript will be published online. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting PLOS Genetics and open-access publishing. We are looking forward to publishing your work!

With kind regards,

Zsofia Freund

PLOS Genetics

On behalf of:

The PLOS Genetics Team

Carlyle House, Carlyle Road, Cambridge CB4 3DN | United Kingdom

plosgenetics@plos.org | +44 (0) 1223-442823

plosgenetics.org | Twitter: @PLOSGenetics

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Mediation analysis of phospholipid QTL identifies Abhd2 as candidate causal gene.

    Mediation analysis of the QTL for seven liver lipids that map to the chromosome 7 locus resulted in substantial LOD drop when conditioned on hepatic Abhd2 expression. Conditioning on all other genes did not result in any appreciable LOD drop for these lipids.

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig. Abhd2 deletion decreased hepatic phosphatidylglycerol concentrations but did not alter mitochondrial gene expression or mitochondrial lipid acyl chain compositions.

    (A) Despite significant reductions in several cardiolipin species in male mice, total hepatic cardiolipin levels in male and female mice did not differ by genotype. However, total phosphatidylglycerol concentrations were decreased Abhd2KO mice compared to WT males (p<0.01). (B) Mitochondrial gene expression, measured as a proxy for mitochondrial number, was not different by sex or genotype. Neither genotype nor sex affected fatty acyl composition of PC, PG or CL in the livers of HF/HS-fed mice. (C) The hepatic phosphatidylcholine landscape was diverse and primarily comprised of acyl chains of C16 or C18 in length and were saturated or monounsaturated. (D) Phosphatidylglycerols were equally represented by fatty acyl lengths of C16 and C18 and contained 0 or 1 double bond. (E) Cardiolipins were highly represented by linoleate, with C18 being 95% of acyl lengths and 98% of CLs containing 1 or more double bonds.

    (TIFF)

    S3 Fig. Whole-body deletion of Abhd2 did not alter growth rates nor fasting blood profiles in C57BL/6J mice.

    Abhd2KO female (A) and male (E) mice showed similar growth curves to WT mice. Fasting glucose (B, F), insulin (C, G), and triglycerides (D, H) did not differ by genotype.

    (TIFF)

    S4 Fig. Loss of Abhd2 altered body compositions of female mice by increasing fat mass as measured by DEXA.

    Body compositions of mice were measured at ~24 weeks of age by DEXA. (A) Body mass of female mice were not significantly different. Fat mass, both as total weight (B) and %body weight (C) increased in Abhd2KO female mice. Lean mass weight (D) did not change with genotype in females, but lean mass as %body weight (E) was reduced in Abhd2KO female mice. Male mice were not different in total body weight, fat, nor lean mass (F-J). *p<0.05.

    (TIFF)

    S5 Fig. Assessment of insulin action by oral glucose tolerance test (oGTT) elicited similar responses between genotypes of the same sex.

    (A) Female Abhd2KO mice showed a trend for increased plasma glucose at 15 and 30-minute timepoints during the oGTT. Male Abhd2KO mice were not different. (B) Area under the curve (AUC) for plasma glucose during the oGTT did not differ by genotype. (C) Plasma insulin response to glucose stimulation were the same for genotypes of each sex, with all mice returning to baseline within two hours of receiving the glucose bolus. (D) Insulin curve AUCs were not different. (E) C-peptide, a marker of insulin secretion, was the same for genotypes of each sex during the oGTT, with no difference in AUC (F). (G) The C-peptide/insulin ratio, used as a surrogate for insulin clearance, were not different at 0, 15, and 30 minutes. (H) AUCs for C-peptide/insulin ratio were similar between genotypes of the same sex.

    (TIFF)

    S6 Fig. β3-adregeneric receptor agonist stimulation failed to produce a physiologic response in Abhd2 KO mice.

    Plasma glucose concentrations at various time points (A) and total AUC for glucose (B) during β3-adregeneric receptor agonist stimulation was not different in male or female Abhd2KO mice. Plasma insulin concentrations (C) and total AUC for insulin (D) during the B3TT were the same for genotypes of each sex. Non-esterified fatty acid (NEFA) concentration (E) and total AUC for NEFA (F), and glycerol concentration (G), and AUC for glycerol (H) during the β3TT did not different for Abhd2KO female or male mice.

    (TIFF)

    S7 Fig. Loss of Abhd2 does not alter the physiological response to prolonged fasting or refeeding.

    Following a 24-hr fast, female mice averaged a 1.7 ± 0.9 gm weight loss and an average 1.1 ± 0.1 gm weight gain following the 6-hour refeed period and were not different for Abhd2KO versus WT mice (A). Plasma NEFAs, measured before and after prolonged fast, were similar between genotypes (B). Male mice lost 2.5 ± 0.2 gm with prolonged fasting and regained 0.6 ± 0.1 gm following refeeding and were not different between genotypes (C). Plasma NEFAs of male mice during the fast/refeed protocol did not differ by genotype (D).

    (TIFF)

    S8 Fig. Loss of Abhd2 did not alter insulin secretion in response to glucose or monoacylglycerol.

    Insulin secretion in response to varying glucose concentration, or two different monoacyl-glycerols (2-AG or 1-PG) (A) and total islet insulin content (B) remained unchanged in cultured islets from female and male Abhd2KO versus WT mice.

    (TIFF)

    S9 Fig. Loss of Abhd2 exerts a subtle influence on whole-body cholesterol metabolism.

    Total plasma cholesterol (A) and triglycerides (B), biliary cholesterol (C), and hepatic cholesterol (D) in female and male Abhd2KO versus WT mice. Male Abhd2KO mice showed a small increase in hepatic cholesterol (p = 0.06). Plasma cholesterol lipoproteins were separated by FPLC and assayed for cholesterol in female (E) and male (F) mice. Total AUC for cholesterol in all FPLC fractions (G). Liver from female (H) and male (I) mice were analyzed for LDL-receptor (LDLR) protein content by immunoblot. (J) Quantitation of LDLR protein abundance was not different between genotypes of the same sex.

    (TIFF)

    S1 Table. 73 protein-coding and non-coding genes are located within a 2Mbp region flanking liver lipid QTL.

    (XLSX)

    S2 Table. 37 lipid classes were detected by untargeted MS-based lipidomics in hepatic tissue of WT and Abhd2KO mice.

    (XLSX)

    S3 Table. 583 unique lipid species were detected in hepatic tissue of WT and Abhd2KO mice.

    (XLSX)

    S4 Table. QTL of mitochondrial lipids conditioned on sex and wave.

    (XLSX)

    S5 Table. QTL of mitochondrial lipids conditioned on sex, wave, and PC 20:4_22:6.

    (XLSX)

    S6 Table. Internal standard for mass spectrometry-based lipidomics.

    (XLSX)

    S7 Table. Primer sequences for RT-PCR.

    (XLSX)

    S8 Table. Antibodies and source for western blot analyses.

    (XLSX)

    S1 Rawdata. Raw data for Abhd2 expression in 500 DO and Abhd2KO mouse phenotyping data.

    (ZIP)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Reviewers_Plos Genet.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Abhd2_ResponsetoReviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    Raw data for Abhd2 expression in DO mice and Abhd2KO mouse phenotyping data are provided as supporting information. Full DO liver untargeted lipidomic data has been previously published (https://www.nature.com/articles/s42255-020-00278-3).


    Articles from PLOS Genetics are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES