To address the challenge of translating genetic discoveries for type 1 diabetes (T1D) into mechanistic insight, we have developed the T1D Knowledge Portal (T1DKP), an open-access resource for hypothesis development and target discovery in T1D.
This Community Page presents the type 1 diabetes (T1D) Knowledge Portal, an open-access resource for hypothesis development and target discovery in T1D that aims to help address the challenge of translating genetic discoveries into mechanistic insight.
Introduction
The etiology of type 1 diabetes (T1D), a complex disease characterized by autoimmune destruction of pancreatic beta cells, is incompletely known [1]. There are currently no cures or effective prevention strategies, and only recently has an immune intervention to delay T1D onset been FDA approved (teplizumab) [2]. In the absence of full blockage of T1D initiation and progression to clinical disease, the only treatment is life-long insulin therapy. There is therefore a pressing need to identify new targets for therapeutic intervention. Discoveries from genetic association studies of complex diseases such as T1D can offer novel insight into pathogenesis, reveal potential therapeutic targets [3], and provide human genetic support for preexisting targets [4].
There are major barriers, however, to translating genetic discoveries into biological and therapeutic insights. The results of genetic association studies are inaccessible to many scientists, since utilizing and interpreting large genetic “summary” files requires expertise in data manipulation and knowledge of domain-specific bioinformatics tools. In addition, most T1D risk variants map to noncoding sequence, where detailed functional annotation of the genome is necessary to predict affected cell types and genes [5]. Finally, testing variant and gene function in cellular and animal models remains a substantial undertaking, often requiring years of work.
Here, we report the T1D Knowledge Portal (T1DKP), an open-access resource developed to help advance T1D research by democratizing access to genetic, genomic, and epigenomic data. The primary goal of the T1DKP is to facilitate the generation of accurate, testable hypotheses from T1D genetic association data by providing a user-friendly interface where researchers can view the results of analyses integrating genetic and functional annotation data using contemporary bioinformatic tools, access “curated” resources such as candidate gene lists generated by domain experts in T1D, and query and visualize data for specific variants, genes, regions, and phenotypes. The T1DKP resides within a larger Knowledge Portal Network of disease-specific portals, all based upon the Human Genetics Amplifier (HuGeAMP) software infrastructure.
Features of the T1DKP
The T1DKP (RRID:SCR_020936), as of June 2023, includes 11 genetic association studies for T1D, including genome-wide association studies (GWAS) from large meta-analyses [6], GWAS from biobanks such as FinnGen, and targeted, fine-mapping studies using the ImmunoChip [7] (Fig 1). The T1DKP also includes 189 association datasets representing 161 T1D-relevant traits, such as diabetic complications, other autoimmune diseases, and glycemic, lipid, renal, and anthropometric traits. We aim to collect all association studies of T1D and relevant phenotypes with available summary statistics by systematically searching the GWAS Catalog, biobanks, and biomedical literature, as well as engaging with the T1D community. We also accept results from manuscripts under review or pre-prints, although these are labeled as “pre-publication” in the T1DKP.
The T1DKP aggregates 5,580 functional annotation datasets from the Common Metabolic Diseases Genome Atlas that describe the location of candidate cis-regulatory elements (cCREs) in the human genome and predicted target genes of cCREs in 200 tissues, primary cells, cell lines, and stem cell-derived models. These annotations are collected both from resources such as ENCODE and from studies performed by individual investigators. In the latter case, studies of T1D-relevant cell types are prioritized for inclusion; for example, there are data identifying cCREs in immune cells in baseline and stimulated conditions [8], as well as chromatin interactions linking cCREs to putative target genes in immune cells [9]. Future releases will incorporate additional annotation types currently lacking from the resource, such as molecular quantitative trait loci (QTLs).
The T1DKP web interface includes pages that summarize genetic associations and functional annotations for specific variants, genomic regions, genes, and phenotypes. Visualizations on these pages, such as PheWAS forest plots and LocusZoom association plots [10], facilitate user interaction with genetic data. Results from bioinformatic methods integrating genetic and genomic datasets provide additional insight. For example, the gene page includes genetic support analyses that indicate whether the gene is likely involved in a trait [4,11]. In another example, the phenotype page includes analyses that describe functional annotations in different cell types and tissues enriched for trait-associated variants [12] and biological pathways associated with the trait [11]. Several interactive modules can also be accessed from summary pages to enable more detailed investigation. Finally, the T1DKP facilitates independent investigations by providing all genetic and functional annotation datasets for download or programmatic access via a REST API (available at http://bioindex.hugeamp.org). Each page and tool of the T1DKP is documented with available online tutorials and videos.
For researchers who are not experts in human genetics, the T1DKP offers intuitive summaries of genetic results. On the gene page, the level of genetic support for a gene across all datasets in the T1DKP is shown qualitatively, ranging from “Compelling” to “No evidence” (Fig 2A). On a separate page, expert-curated candidate gene lists are provided, accompanied by supporting evidence such as protein-coding mutations causing T1D-relevant monogenic phenotypes, noncoding T1D variants linked to the gene, and model system perturbations causing T1D-relevant phenotypes (Fig 2B). These lists and supporting evidence are designed to be used by non-geneticists to develop hypotheses and guide experiments for specific genes. For researchers wishing to explore the details of genetic and genomic data in greater detail, the T1DKP provides interfaces and tools that can help to prioritize candidate genes likely involved in T1D risk at specific loci. For example, from the region page the user can link to a “Variant Sifter” module that enables selection of a series of filters to prioritize candidate variants, genes, and tissues/cell types to guide experiments in that region (Fig 2C).
Conclusion
The T1DKP enables exploration of genetic and functional annotation data relevant to T1D on an interactive website designed for use by both experimental biologists and experts in human genetics. Compared to disease-agnostic resources that also provide platforms for analyzing human genetic and genomic data such as Open Targets, 2 core strengths of a disease-focused resource such as T1DKP are aggregation of datasets from studies of high value to that specific disease that may be missing from “pan-disease” catalogs and incorporation of curated datasets created by domain experts. Consequently, the T1DKP primarily focuses on traits directly related to T1D, and users who wish to view associations for a wider range of traits should consult other portals in the Knowledge Portal Network, including the Association to Function Knowledge Portal, or resources such as the GWAS Catalog and Open Targets.
Moving forward, a key goal of the T1DKP is to continue engaging with the T1D community to identify and add T1D-relevant datasets, as well as to generate new datasets from available cohorts. For example, association data from whole genome and exome sequencing will help identify genes carrying rare variants involved in T1D; association data from different ancestries will both reveal additional T1D risk and help resolve causal variants for signals shared across populations; functional annotations such as molecular QTLs and systematic screens of variant function will enhance interpretation of risk loci; and gene perturbation phenotypes in human cells and model organisms will facilitate understanding gene function in T1D. We also will continue to improve expert-curated candidate gene lists, which is a unique aspect of this resource to our knowledge, by collaborating with a wider range of researchers and incorporating additional data types. We look forward to collaborating with the T1D community to advance these and other areas of the T1DKP.
Acknowledgments
We thank members of the Gaulton, Burtt, Flannick, and Rich labs for input on the manuscript, and members of the AMP-T2D and AMP-CMD consortia and the T1D research community for critical input on the development of the T1DKP and other repositories in the Knowledge Portal Network.
Abbreviations
- cCRE
candidate cis-regulatory element
- GWAS
genome-wide association studies
- HuGeAMP
Human Genetics Amplifier
- QTL
quantitative trait locus
- T1D
type 1 diabetes
- T1DKP
T1D Knowledge Portal
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health grant numbers DK105554 to JF, KG, and NB, DK122607 to KG, DK122586 to SR. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Atkinson MA. The pathogenesis and natural history of type 1 diabetes. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2012;2:a007641. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a007641 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Herold KC, Bundy BN, Long SA, Bluestone JA, DiMeglio LA, Dufort MJ, et al. An Anti-CD3 Antibody, Teplizumab, in Relatives at Risk for Type 1 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:603–613. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1902226 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Claussnitzer M, Cho JH, Collins R, Cox NJ, Dermitzakis ET, Hurles ME, et al. A brief history of human disease genetics. Nature. 2020;577:179–189. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1879-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Dornbos P, Singh P, Jang D-K, Mahajan A, Biddinger SB, Rotter JI, et al. Evaluating human genetic support for hypothesized metabolic disease genes. Cell Metab. 2022;34:661–666. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2022.03.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.ENCODE Project Consortium, Moore JE, Purcaro MJ, Pratt HE, Epstein CB, Shoresh N, et al. Expanded encyclopaedias of DNA elements in the human and mouse genomes. Nature. 2020;583:699–710. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2493-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chiou J, Geusz RJ, Okino M-L, Han JY, Miller M, Melton R, et al. Interpreting type 1 diabetes risk with genetics and single-cell epigenomics. Nature. 2021;594:398–402. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03552-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Robertson CC, Inshaw JRJ, Onengut-Gumuscu S, Chen W-M, Santa Cruz DF, Yang H, et al. Fine-mapping, trans-ancestral and genomic analyses identify causal variants, cells, genes and drug targets for type 1 diabetes. Nat Genet. 2021;53:962–971. doi: 10.1038/s41588-021-00880-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Calderon D, Nguyen MLT, Mezger A, Kathiria A, Müller F, Nguyen V, et al. Landscape of stimulation-responsive chromatin across diverse human immune cells. Nat Genet. 2019;51:1494–1505. doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0505-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Javierre BM, Burren OS, Wilder SP, Kreuzhuber R, Hill SM, Sewitz S, et al. Lineage-Specific Genome Architecture Links Enhancers and Non-coding Disease Variants to Target Gene Promoters. Cell. 2016;167:1369–1384.e19. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.09.037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Boughton AP, Welch RP, Flickinger M, VandeHaar P, Taliun D, Abecasis GR, et al. LocusZoom.js: Interactive and embeddable visualization of genetic association study results. Bioinformatics. 2021;37:3017–3018. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab186 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.de Leeuw CA, Mooij JM, Heskes T, Posthuma D. MAGMA: generalized gene-set analysis of GWAS data. PLoS Comput Biol. 2015;11(4):e1004219. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004219 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Schmidt EM, Zhang J, Zhou W, Chen J, Mohlke KL, Chen YE, et al. GREGOR: evaluating global enrichment of trait-associated variants in epigenomic features using a systematic, data-driven approach. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:2601–2606. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv201 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]