Abstract
5-Methylated cytosine is a frequent modification in eukaryotic RNA and DNA influencing mRNA stability and gene expression. Here we show that free 5-methylcytidine (5mC) and 5-methyl-2′-deoxycytidine are generated from nucleic acid turnover in Arabidopsis thaliana, and elucidate how these cytidines are degraded, which is unclear in eukaryotes. First CYTIDINE DEAMINASE produces 5-methyluridine (5mU) and thymidine which are subsequently hydrolyzed by NUCLEOSIDE HYDROLASE 1 (NSH1) to thymine and ribose or deoxyribose. Interestingly, far more thymine is generated from RNA than from DNA turnover, and most 5mU is directly released from RNA without a 5mC intermediate, since 5-methylated uridine (m5U) is an abundant RNA modification (m5U/U ∼1%) in Arabidopsis. We show that m5U is introduced mainly by tRNA-SPECIFIC METHYLTRANSFERASE 2A and 2B. Genetic disruption of 5mU degradation in the NSH1 mutant causes m5U to occur in mRNA and results in reduced seedling growth, which is aggravated by external 5mU supplementation, also leading to more m5U in all RNA species. Given the similarities between pyrimidine catabolism in plants, mammals and other eukaryotes, we hypothesize that the removal of 5mU is an important function of pyrimidine degradation in many organisms, which in plants serves to protect RNA from stochastic m5U modification.
Graphical Abstract
Graphical Abstract.
INTRODUCTION
Of the more than 100 chemical modifications in various eukaryotic RNAs, the greatest diversity is found in tRNAs. In absolute quantity, most modifications are present in rRNAs, which are the most abundant RNA species. These modifications promote the stability and translation functions of these RNAs (1,2). Recent technical advances have shown that mRNA also carries modifications such as N6-methyladenosine (m6A) (3,4), N1-methyladenosine (5), 5-methylcytidine (m5C) (6), N4-acetylcytidine (7) and pseudouridine (Ψ) (8). Specific enzymes, named ‘writer’ and ‘eraser’ proteins, are required for the introduction and removal of these modifications at the mRNA level, respectively. Such mRNA modifications are decoded by different ‘reader’ proteins and influence the stability and translation efficiency of their targeted transcripts (9,10). Upon RNA turnover, modified nucleotides such as N6-methyladenosine monophosphate (N6-mAMP), pseudouridine monophosphate (ΨMP) and 5-methylcytdine monophosphate, are released together with other canonical nucleotides. A conserved N6-mAMP deaminase, recently characterized in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and human (Homo sapiens) cells, catalyzes the hydrolysis of N6-mAMP to inosine monophosphate (11), an intermediate of general purine metabolism (12). The catabolism of Ψ, the most abundant modified nucleoside in non-coding RNA (ncRNA), has also been described in Arabidopsis. Free Ψ must be transported into peroxisomes, where it is phosphorylated by a pseudouridine kinase to ΨMP, which is hydrolyzed by a peroxisomal ΨMP glycosylase into uracil and ribose-5-phosphate (13,14), both intermediates of canonical pyrimidine nucleoside catabolism. Mammals lack these enzymes and excrete Ψ with the urine (15), whereas other animals, such as birds, fish and insects, have this catabolic pathway (13). Thus, in plants and many other eukaryotes, specialized enzymes are required for the conversion of the modified nucleotides N6-mAMP and ΨMP into intermediates of general nucleotide metabolism, whereas in mammals some modified nucleosides can also be disposed of by secretion.
Unlike m6A and Ψ, m5C is widely distributed not only in ncRNAs but also in mRNAs of eukaryotic organisms (16–18). This C methylation is introduced by NOP2/SUN RNA METHYLTRANSFERASE FAMILY MEMBER 2 (NSUN2) in mammals (16) and by tRNA-SPECIFIC METHYLTRANSFERASE 4B (TRM4B) in Arabidopsis (6). It was observed that m5C is enriched in 3′-untranslated regions and regions immediately downstream of translation initiation sites, where it is recognized by the reader protein ALY/REF EXPORT FACTOR (ALYREF), which mediates nuclear export of m5C-methylated transcripts (16,19). In Arabidopsis, mutants of TRM4B lacking RNA m5C methyltransferase activity undergo fewer cell divisions in the root apical meristem, resulting in shorter primary roots and increased sensitivity to oxidative stress (17). 5-Methyl-2′-deoxycytidine (5mdC) is a major epigenetic mark of DNA (5mC). Upon RNA turnover, 5-methylcytidine (5mC) is released while DNA turnover or repair lead to the release of 5mdC.
In plant pyrimidine metabolism, CYTIDINE DEAMINASE (CDA) and NUCLEOSIDE HYDROLASE 1 (NSH1) are two important enzymes involved in nucleoside and nucleotide homeostasis (12,20). Cytidine degradation begins with its deamination by CDA to uridine (21), which is then hydrolyzed by NSH1 to uracil and ribose (22,23) (Supplementary Figure S1). NSH1 also hydrolyzes C5-methylated uridine (5mU) in vitro (24), but it is unknown whether 5mC is a substrate of CDA. If that were the case, the NSH1 substrate 5mU could originate from 5mC deamination. Alternatively or additionally, this methylated uridine may also be directly derived from m5U-modified RNA species. Although m5U has been detected in plant tRNAs (25), little is generally known about m5U in plant RNAs. In mammals and yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), m5U has been found in rRNA and tRNA (26) as well as in mRNA (27,28), but its metabolic fate upon degradation of these RNAs has not yet been investigated. There are many similarities between plant and mammalian pyrimidine nucleoside catabolism (Supplementary Figure S1). Mammals possess a CDA that can deaminate C, dC and 5mC in vitro (29). The degradation of uridine (U), deoxyuridine (dU) and thymidine (dT) is catalyzed by phosphorylases (30–32) and not by hydrolases as in plants, but in both organisms the bases uracil or thymine (T) are released by these enzymes which are further metabolized in similar ways (33,34) (Supplementary Figure S1).
In this study, we investigated the origin of methylated (deoxy-)cytidines and (deoxy-)uridines in Arabidopsis and their metabolic fate, showing that CDA and NSH1 are required for the catabolism of most but not all of these compounds. Moreover, we present experimental evidence that plant RNAs contain m5U and that TRM2A and TRM2B are the main writer enzymes for m5U. We also investigated whether NSH1 and CDA are required to protect RNA from random methylation events and can show that NSH1 is indeed involved. Phenotypic consequences of defective pyrimidine nucleoside degradation were also investigated.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Plant material and cultivation
Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) ecotype Col-0 was chosen as the wild type. T-DNA insertion mutants of Arabidopsis from the SALK collection (35), the SAIL collection (36) and the GABI-Kat collection (37) were obtained from the Nottingham Arabidopsis Stock Centre. Complementation lines for cda-1 and nsh1 were described previously (21,38). Double mutants were obtained by crossing cda-1 and trm4b-1, cda-1 and cmt3-11, cda-1 and ros1-4, pyd1 and cda-1, pyd1 and nsh1, and trm2a and nsh1; the pollen donor is named last in each case. The T-DNA insertions were confirmed using the primer pairs 448/N0262, N261/N61, N61/2616, N61/1426, 1197/Cp99, N61/Cp108, N61/Cp111, N61/Cp242 and N61/Cp237 for cda-1, cda-2, nsh1, pyd1, trm4b-1, cmt3-11, ros1-4, trm2a and trm2b lines, respectively, and the primer pairs N0261/N0262, N0261/N0262, 1905/2616, 1236/1426, Cp99/Cp100, Cp108/Cp109, Cp110/Cp111, Cp241/Cp242 and Cp237/Cp238 for the wild-type alleles of cda-1, cda-2, nsh1, pyd1, trm4b-1, cmt3-11, ros1-4, trm2a and trm2b lines, respectively (Supplementary Table S1).
Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana plants were cultivated in a controlled growth chamber (16 h light of 75 μmol/m/s at 22°C and 8 h dark at 20°C, 75% relative humidity). For metabolic profiling and RNA extraction, plants were grown on full nutrient soil or on Petri dishes containing half-strength Murashige and Skoog (MS) agar. For the 5mU and U treatments, the plants were grown on half-strength MS medium supplied with 500 ng/ml 5mU or 5000 ng/ml U, respectively. The leaf area of seedlings was quantified from photographs employing the ImageJ (v 1.8.0) software.
RNA extraction, reverse transcription and mRNA preparation
RNA from plants was isolated using Trizol reagent (Monad) and treated with DNase (4× gDNA wiper Mix; Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd), and cDNA was prepared using HiScript II Q Select RT Super Mix (Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd). Oligo (dT) was used for reverse transcription. To measure gene-specific mRNA levels in the mutants, cDNAs were prepared from seedlings of each genotype. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) used primer pairs Cp345/Cp346 and Cp237/Cp238, giving rise to a product of 2496 bp and 1743 bp from the wild-type alleles of trm2a and trm2b, respectively. The primers flanked the T-DNA insertions in each case. The sequences of primers used in analyses are listed in Supplementary Table S1. Non-polyadenylated RNA and mRNA were isolated from total RNA for digestion employing the PolyATract mRNA Isolation Systems III (Promega). For mRNA preparation, two rounds of purification were performed. The RNA was quantified by a NanoDrop photometer (Thermo Scientific), and the purity and the integrity were assessed by applying 100 ng of RNA per sample on a bioanalyzer (Agilent).
Protein purification and determination of kinetic constants
Recombinant Arabidopsis CDA and NSH1 were affinity purified after transient expression in N. benthamiana as described before (21,38). Purified protein was quantified using the Bradford reagent from Tiangen with bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a standard.
The enzymatic activity of CDA was assessed as described (21), with minor modifications. For individual reactions, recombinant CDA solutions were adjusted to 5 μg/ml using elution buffer of the purification procedure. A 150 μl aliquot of the substrate solution was incubated at 30°C for 5 min. The reaction was started by adding 50 μl of enzyme solution. In a time course, 40 μl aliquots were added to 160 μl of water, followed by the addition of 50 μl of phenol nitroprusside reagent and 100 μl of hypochlorite reagent for colorimetric ammonia quantification (39). The absorbance was determined by photometric measurement at 636 nm. Ammonium standard curves were generated by adding elution buffer instead of enzyme solution to the reaction mix and placing 40 μl aliquots in 160 μl of NH4Cl solutions of different concentrations prior to detection. The kinetic constants were determined for C concentrations of 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 3, 5 and 10 mM, for dC concentrations of 0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2 and 5 mM, for 5mC concentrations of 1, 3, 5, 10, 25, 50, 100 and 200 mM, for 5mdC concentrations of 1, 5, 10, 25, 50 and 100 mM, and for 2′-O-methylcytidine (2OmC) concentrations of 1, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 and 200 mM. Kinetic curves were recorded in four independent repeats, and kinetic constants were determined by fitting the data to the Michaelis–Menten equation using the GraphPad Prism software.
Recombinant NSH1 solutions were adjusted to 57.5 μg/ml using 100 mM HEPES buffer (pH 8). For individual reactions, 200 μl of 20 mM uridine or 2′-O-methyluridine (2OmU) substrate solution was incubated at 30°C for 5 min. The reaction was started by adding 40 μl of NSH1 enzyme solution. In a time course, 60 μl aliquots were taken and the reaction was terminated by heating the mixture to 98°C for 10 min. The activity was determined by quantifying uracil production over time via high performance liquid chromatograpy (HPLC; Agilent Infinity 1260).
Metabolite analyses
Nucleotide metabolite analyses were performed using an Agilent 1290 HPLC system coupled to an Agilent 6460 triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer, and other metabolites were analyzed by an Agilent 1290 HPLC system coupled to a Sciex 6500 Qtrap mass spectrometer. Sample extraction was performed as described (20,38), with minor modifications. The plant material was frozen in liquid nitrogen and ground in 2 ml centrifuge vials with steel beads in a tissue grinder (Tissuelyser-48L, Shanghai Jingxin) at a frequency of 60 Hz for 5 min. For nucleoside and nucleobase measurement, 30 mg of homogenized plant material was extracted with 200 μl of 0.1% formic acid and then immediately incubated at 95°C for 10 min. After centrifugation at 20 000 g for 20 min, the suspension was passed through a SyringeFilter (Nylon/PES, 0.2 μm; Tianjin Branch billion Lung Experimental Equipment Co., Ltd) to remove any particles. For nucleotide analyses, plant material was extracted and samples prepared as previously described (20).
For the analysis of nucleosides and nucleobases, 2 μl samples were separated on a WATERS T3 column (2.1 × 100 mm; particle size 1.8 μm) at a flow rate of 0.3 ml/min. Solvent A was 0.1% formic acid and Solvent B was acetonitrile. The gradient was 0 min, 5% B; 0.5 min, 5% B; 3 min, 90% B; 4 min, 90% B; 4.1 min, 5% B; and 7 min, 5% B. The following mass transitions were monitored: m/z 244.3 to 111.9 (C), m/z 258.4 to 125.9 (5mC), m/z 258.2 to 111.9 (2OmC), m/z 228.3 to 111.9 (dC), m/z 242.3 to 125.9 (5mdC), m/z 245.3 to 133 (U), m/z 259.2 to 126.9 (5mU), m/z 259.1 to 127.1 (3-methyluridine; 3mU), m/z 259.3 to 112.9 (2OmU), m/z 243 to 127 (dT), m/z 111.1 to 111.1 (U) and m/z 127.9 to 110 (T). All compounds were quantified using external standards added to wild-type extracts from the corresponding growth conditions as matrix. C: 0, 100, 500, 1000, 5000, 20 000 and 50 000 ng/ml; 5mC: 0, 10, 50, 100, 500 and 2000 ng/ml; 2OmC: 0, 20, 100, 200, 1000, 4000 and 10 000 ng/ml; dC: 0, 5, 25, 50, 250, 1000, 2500 and 5000 ng/ml; 5mdC: 0, 0.125, 0.5, 1.25, 5 and 25 ng/ml; 5mU: 0, 10, 50, 100, 500 and 2000 ng/ml; 2OmU: 0, 20, 100, 200, 1000, 4000 and 10 000 ng/ml; dT: 0, 1.25, 5, 25, 50 and 100 ng/ml; uracil: 0, 2.5, 12.5, 25, 125, 250 and 500 ng/ml; and thymine: 0, 2.5, 12.5, 25, 125, 250 and 500 ng/ml were used as external standards.
For nucleotide analyses, 10 μl samples were separated on a Hypercarb column (50 × 4.6 mm, particle size 5 μm, Thermo Scientific) at a flow rate of 0.6 ml/min. Solvent A was 5mM NH4Ac (pH 9.5) and Solvent B was acetonitrile. The gradient was 0 min, 4% B; 10 min, 30% B; 10.1 min, 100% B; 11.5 min, 100% B; 11.6 min, 4% B; and 20 min, 4% B. The following mass transitions were monitored: m/z 499 to 97 (5-methyl-UTP; 5mUTP) and m/z 485 to 97 (UTP). UTP was quantified against its internal standard, while 5mUTP was quantified using external standards (25, 50, 125, 250, 500 and 2500 ng/ml) added to the wild-type extracts from the corresponding growth condition as matrix.
Quantitative analyses of the nucleic acid modification by LC-MS/MS
RNA and DNA samples were fully digested into single nucleosides as described previously (11) with minor modifications. A 800 ng aliquot of total RNA, mRNA, non-polyadenylated RNA or DNA was individually digested by benzonase (0.4 U; Sigma-Aldrich) and phosphodiesterase I (0.004 U; Sigma-Aldrich), and then dephosphorylated by shrimp alkaline phosphatase (0.04 U; NEB) in 50 μl of buffer containing 10 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.9, 1 mM MgCl2 and 0.1 mg/ml BSA. After incubation at 37°C for 10 h, the samples were filtered in ultrafiltration tubes (3 kDa cut-off; Pall), and 2 μl aliquots were analyzed by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The nucleosides were separated and identified as described above. Standard solutions of C: 1, 5, 25 50, 100, 200, 400, 2000 and 10 000 ng/ml; U: 1, 5,25 50, 100, 200, 400, 2000 and 10 000 ng/ml; 5mC: 0.1, 0.5, 0.5, 5, 10, 20, 40, 200 and 1000 ng/ml; 5mU: 0.1, 0.5, 2.5, 5 and 10 ng/ml; 2OmC: 0.1, 0.5, 2.5, 5 and 10 ng/ml; 2′-O-methyl-deoxycytidine (2OmdC): 0.5, 2.5, 12.5, 62.5, 125, 250, 500, 1000 and 2000 ng/ml; or 5mdC: 0.5, 2.5, 12.5, 25, 50, 100, 200 and 400 ng/ml were used for quantification. The ratio of 5mC to C, 2OmC to C, 5mdC to dC, and 5mU to U were calculated based on the calibrated concentrations.
The ability of eukaryotic RNA polymerase II to use 5mUTP as substrate was assessed using the HeLa Scribe nuclear extract in vitro transcription system (Promega) as described previously (11). 5mUTP and UTP mixed in different ratios (0:100, 1:99, 2:98, 5:95, 10:90 and 20:80) were applied. RNA was isolated after a reaction time of 1 h and then subjected to digestion. The 5mU to U ratio was determined by LC-MS/MS as described above.
Quantification and statistical analysis
Data for the leaf area of seedlings from different genotypes grown under various conditions were analyzed and plotted with R (version 4.2.2) in combination with RStudio (version 2022.07.02). The final figure was created with GraphPad (version 9.0). Linear modeling of log-transformed data (package ‘nlme’ version 3.1-162) and subsequent testing for normality by visual inspection of normal plots with simulation envelopes (package ‘hnp’ version 1.2-6) showed normality for the log-transformed data generated for Figure 7 which were chosen for further processing. We tested whether the analysis would benefit from an extension with generalized least square models that account for heterogeneous variances. However, by calculating the lowest Akaike information criterion (AICc; package ‘MuMIn’ version 1.47.5), we found the lowest value for the model assuming equal variances which was chosen for further calculations. Confidence intervals (at 95%) and significance tests were calculated on the model-based means with the package ‘emmeans’ (version 1.8.5) considering the ratio of genotypes and mock-treated versus untreated seedlings. For other figures, if applicable, analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey's honestly significant difference test was performed in R (version 4.2.2) for statistical evaluation. Different letters represent differences at the P < 0.05 significance level.
Figure 7.
Growth phenotypes, metabolite profiles and m5U frequencies in 7-day-old seedlings varying in NSH1 expression grown in the presence or absence of 5mU or U. (A) Col-0, nsh1 and the complementation line after 7 days of growth on standard medium (top panel) or in the presence of 0.5 μg/ml 5mU (middle panel) or 5 μg/ml U (bottom panel) under long-day conditions (16 h of light). Scale bar = 1 cm. (B) Leaf area quantification of Col-0, nsh1 and the complementation line grown as shown in (A). n = 125 plants for each genotype from five replicates with 25 plants each germinated from seeds derived from different mother plants. (C) Statistical evaluation of data from (B). Ratios of ratios and confidence intervals at P = 95% as well as P-values are displayed. The ratio of the leaf area of a genotype on supplemented medium versus the leaf area on control medium was put in relation to the same ratio obtained from a second genotype. This allows statistical evaluation and quantification of whether a genotype is more strongly affected by 5mU or U treatment than another genotype. (D) 5mU contents in 7-day-old seedlings of the wild type (Col-0, white), the nsh1 line (light blue) and the complementation line (dark blue) grown on standard medium or in presence of 0.5 μg/ml 5mU. Error bars are the SD (n = 3 biological replicates). Different letters label data that are significantly different at P < 0.05. fw, fresh weight. (E) m5U frequencies relative to U in total RNA, non-polyadenylated RNA (rRNA and tRNA) and mRNA of 7-day-old seedlings of the wild type (Col-0; white), the nsh1 line (light orange) and the complementation line (dark orange) grown in the presence of 0.5 μg/ml 5mU. Error bars are the SD (n = 5 biological replicates). Different letters label data that are significantly different at P < 0.05.
RESULTS
Exploration of the catabolism of methylated cytidines
To investigate whether CDA, encoded by At2g19570, can use 5mC and other modified cytidines as substrate, we affinity-purified recombinant CDA fused to a C-terminal Strep tag (CDA-Strep) transiently produced in N. benthamiana leaves (Supplementary Figure S2A) (21). The substrate range of the purified CDA was assessed using C and dC as well as eight modified (deoxy)cytidine nucleosides naturally found in plant RNA or DNA. Each nucleoside was provided at a concentration of 2 mM (Figure 1A). Five nucleosides were good substrates for CDA: C, 5mC, 2′-O-methylcytidine (2OmC), dC and 5mdC. For human CDA also C, 5mC and dC were good substrates in vitro (29), while other possible in vivo substrates have not yet been tested. For Arabidopsis CDA, it has already been shown that dC is a substrate in vitro (21), and it has also been noted that a mutant of CDA accumulates dC, suggesting that it is a substrate of CDA in vivo (20). CDA was inactive with the possible in vivo substrates N3-methylcytidine, N4-acetylcytidine, 5-hydroxymethylcytidine, 5-formylcytidine and 5-hydroxymethyl-deoxycytidine (Figure 1A). The catalytic efficiency (kcat/KM) of CDA was 35.9/mM/s for C and 64.8/mM/s for dC (Supplementary Figure S2B, C; Table 1), similar to previous results (21). For 5mC, 2OmC and 5mdC, the catalytic efficiency of CDA was 4.4, 4.3 and 13.8/mM/s, respectively, markedly lower than that for the two non-methylated substrates (Figure 1B, C, D; Table 1). This difference resulted mainly from higher KM values for the methylated cytidines, indicating that CDA binds these substrates less efficiently than (d)C but catalyzes them well once they are bound.
Figure 1.
Biochemical analyses of CDA. (A) Enzymatic activity of CDA with different nucleosides as substrates, each at a concentration of 2 mM. Error bars are the SD (n = 4 independent reactions). n.d., not detectable. (B) Determination of kinetic constants for CDA with 5-methylcytidine (5mC). S, substrate concentration; V, enzymatic velocity. The kinetic data were fitted with the Michaelis–Menten equation (red curve), or plotted as S/V over S (Hanes plot) and fitted by linear regression (blue line). Error bars are the SD (n = 4 independent reactions). (C) Same as in (B) but with 2′-O-methylcytidine (2OmC) as substrate. (D) Same as in (B) but with 5-methyl-2′-deoxycytidine (5mdC) as substrate.
Table 1.
Kinetic parameters of recombinant Arabidopsis CDA for different substrates
| AtCDA | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Substrate | K M | k cat | k cat/KM |
| (mM) | (/s) | (/mM/s) | |
| Cytidine | 0.82 ± 0.15 | 29.43 ± 1.65 | 35.9 |
| 5mC | 8.05 ± 0.96 | 35.36 ± 1.04 | 4.4 |
| 2OmC | 8.34 ± 1.12 | 35.46 ± 1.12 | 4.3 |
| dC | 0.28 ± 0.05 | 18.15 ± 0.66 | 64.8 |
| 5mdC | 3.92 ± 0.61 | 54.1 ± 1.68 | 13.8 |
CDA and NSH1 are required for methylated pyrimidine degradation in vivo
To investigate the in vivo activity of CDA with these methylated cytidine nucleosides, we used two independent homozygous T-DNA insertion mutants, cda-1 and cda-2, and a complementation line expressing C-terminal hemagglutinin (HA) and Strep-tagged CDA in the cda-1 background (called AtCDA +cda-1) reported previously (21). We quantified 5mC, 2OmC, 5mdC, C and dC contents by LC-MS/MS in extracts from 20-day-old seedlings of these lines and the wild type (Col-0). Contents of 5mC, 2OmC and 5mdC were ∼20, 32 and 10 times higher, respectively, in both cda lines compared with the wild type (Figure 2). Contents of cytidine and dC were ∼20 and 5.8 times higher, respectively, in cda than in the wild type (Supplementary Figure S3). The accumulation of these nucleosides was prevented by the AtCDA transgene in the cda background (Figure 2; Supplementary Figure S3). These data demonstrate that CDA is required in vivo for the catabolism of 5mC, 2OmC and 5mdC. Although mammalian CDA is very probably also involved in the degradation of methylated cytidines in vivo, its role and the physiological consequences of altered CDA activity in this context have so far not been investigated (40–42).
Figure 2.
Metabolite analyses of seedlings varying in CDA expression. (A) 5mC contents in 20-day-old seedlings of the wild type (Col-0, white), the two cda lines (light blue) and the complementation line (dark blue). Error bars are the SD (n = 4 biological replicates). Different letters label data that are significantly different at P < 0.05. fw, fresh weight. (B) Same as in (A) but showing 2OmC contents. (C) Same as in (A) but showing 5mdC contents.
The deamination of cytidine by CDA produces uridine, which is an in vivo substrate of NSH1 (22). In vitro, NSH1 also hydrolyzes 5mU (24), prompting us to hypothesize that NSH1 might be involved in the catabolism of the other deamination products of CDA, i.e. 5mU, 2′-O-methyluridine (2OmU) and dT. To test this idea, we measured contents of these three compounds in 20-day-old seedlings of Col-0, a null mutant in NSH1 (nsh1) and a complementation line (AtNSH1 +nsh1), which had been characterized previously (38). Contents of 5mU and dT were ∼275 and 3.3 times higher, respectively, in the mutant seedlings than in the wild type, and the NSH1 transgene complemented this molecular phenotype (Figure 3A, B). An accumulation of dT in nsh1 had been noted before (20). In contrast, 2OmU did not accumulate in nsh1 seedlings and similar amounts of this compound were measured in all lines (Figure 3C). Consistent with this result, NSH1 lacked activity with 2OmU in vitro when this compound was incubated with the affinity-purified enzyme (Supplementary Figure S4). These data show that NSH1 is required for the hydrolysis of 5mU and dT in vivo, whereas 2OmU is not an NSH1 substrate and will probably be degraded by another so far unknown process. Although mammalian RNA also contains m5U (43), its metabolic fate after RNA degradation has not yet been investigated.
Figure 3.

Metabolite analyses of seedlings varying in NSH1 expression. (A) 5-Methyluridine (5mU) contents in 20-day-old seedlings of the wild type (Col-0, white), the nsh1 line (light blue) and the complementation line (dark blue). Error bars are the SD (n = 4 biological replicates). Different letters label data that are significantly different at P < 0.05. fw, fresh weight. (B) Same as in (A) but showing thymidine (dT) contents. (C) Same as in (A) but showing 2′-O-methyluridine (2OmU) contents.
Pyrimidine ring catabolism degrades thymine which is mainly derived from RNA
NSH1 hydrolyzes 5mU and dT in the cytosol producing thymine (5-methyluracil) and either ribose or deoxyribose. It has been shown that the first enzyme of pyrimidine ring catabolism DIHYDROURACIL DEHYDROGENASE (DPYD), also called PYRIMIDINE 1 (PYD1), is required for uracil and thymine degradation, because mutants lacking this enzyme were strongly compromised in producing CO2 from exogenously supplied radiolabeled substrates (34,44). It was also shown in these studies that mutants of PYD1 accumulate uracil in vivo, whereas the content of thymine was not reported, probably because thymine was thought to be derived from DNA turnover or repair and therefore quantitatively of minor importance. Our data show that there is almost two orders of magnitude more 5mU in nsh1 seedlings than the corresponding deoxynucleoside dT, strongly suggesting that the thymine generated by NSH1 is derived mainly from RNA rather than from DNA turnover (Figure 3). Therefore, we hypothesized that a mutant of PYD1 would accumulate substantial amounts of thymine, far more than would be expected from DNA turnover and repair. We used the pyd1-1 allele (34) for this experiment and additionally crossed this mutant to mutants of CDA (cda-1) and NSH1 (nsh1-1) (24). In 20-day-old seedlings, uracil but also thymine accumulated strongly in the PYD1 mutant (Figure 4). There was about the same amount of thymine in pyd1 seedlings (∼16 nmol/g fw) as 5mU in the nsh1 background (∼22 nmol/g fw; Figure 3), supporting the idea that most thymine that enters catabolism is derived from RNA and not from DNA. The thymine accumulation was suppressed by ∼30% and 85% in the double mutants pyd1 cda and pyd1 nsh1, respectively (Figure 4A). The weaker suppression in the cda background shows that much of the 5mU hydrolyzed by NSH1 does not stem from 5mC deamination but is probably directly derived from m5U-containing RNA. So far, m5U has only been detected in plant tRNAs (25), but the high accumulation of 5mU in nsh1 indicates that other plant RNAs, especially the abundant rRNAs, also contain m5U.
Figure 4.
Metabolite analyses of pyd1 cda and pyd1 nsh1 seedlings in comparison with pyd1 seedlings and the wild type. (A) Thymine contents in 20-day-old seedlings of the wild type (Col-0, white), the pyd1 line (light blue) and the pyd1 cda-1 and pyd1 cda-1 double mutant lines (dark blue). Error bars are the SD (n = 4 biological replicates). Different letters label data that are significantly different at P < 0.05. fw, fresh weight. (B) Same as in (A) but showing uracil contents.
DNA turnover and repair contribute a comparatively small amount of thymine, as the CDA and NSH1 mutants accumulate far fewer 5-methylated deoxynucleosides (5mdC and dT) than methylated nucleosides (5mC and 5mU, Figures 2 and 3). Nonetheless, in the pyd1 nsh1 line, there is more thymine than in the wild type (Figure 4A), indicating that not all thymine is generated via nucleoside hydrolysis by NSH1. Some will be released by nucleobase excision repair directly from DNA without a nucleoside intermediate (45).
Origin of 5mC, 5mdC and 5mU
In plants, TRM4B, encoded by At2g22400, introduces a methyl group into cytosine residues in RNA molecules (6). A mutation in TRM4B (trm4b-1) (17) led to an ∼2-fold decrease in m5C abundance in total RNA relative to its abundance in the wild type (Figure 5A). To investigate whether the CDA substrate 5mC (Figures 1 and 2) stems from the degradation of m5C-containing RNA, we crossed the cda-1 mutant to the trm4b-1 mutant and analyzed the resulting lines. In 20-day-old cda trm4b seedlings, ∼41% less 5mC was detected compared with the cda single mutant (Figure 5B), demonstrating that a substantial amount of 5mC originates from m5C RNA breakdown.
Figure 5.
Determination of the origin of 5mC, 5mdC and 5mU in Arabidopsis. In all panels, 20-day-old seedlings were used. Error bars are the SD (n = 4 biological replicates). Different letters label data that are significantly different at P < 0.05. fw, fresh weight. (A) m5C frequency relative to C in total RNA of the wild type (Col-0; white) and the trm4b-1 line (dark orange). (B) 5mC contents of the wild type (Col-0, white), the cda line (light blue) and the trm4b cda double mutant line (dark blue). (C) 5mC frequency relative to dC in DNA of the wild type (Col-0; white), the cmt3-11 line (light orange) and the ros1-4 line (dark orange). (D) 5mdC contents of the wild type (Col-0, white), the cda-1 line (light blue) and cmt3-11 cda and trm4b cda double mutant lines (dark blue). (E) m5U frequency relative to U in total RNA of the wild type (Col-0; white), the trm2a and trm2b lines (light orange) and the double mutant (dark orange). (F) 5mU content of the wild type (Col-0, white), the nsh1-1 line (light blue) and nsh1-1 trm2a double mutant line (dark blue).
CHROMOMETHYLASE3 (CMT3; AT1G69770) and REPRESSOR OF SILENCING1 (ROS1; AT2G36490) are required for the addition and removal, respectively, of cytosine methylation in plant DNA (46). Mutations in CMT3 (cmt3-11) (47) or ROS1 (ros1-4) (48) resulted in lower or higher 5mC abundance in DNA, respectively (Figure 5C). To test whether free 5mdC is released from the degradation of 5mC-containing DNA, we crossed cda-1 to cmt3-11 and ros1-4. Compared with the wild type, which contains little free 5mdC, cda and cmt cda as well as ros cda seedlings all accumulated significantly more of this methylated deoxynucleoside in vivo (Figure 5D). However, compared with cda, levels were lower by ∼26% in cmt cda and higher by ∼19% in ros cda plants (Figure 5D), demonstrating that 5mdC accumulating in the cda background is derived from DNA degradation.
CDA can generate 5mU by deamination of 5mC. However, the concentration of 5mU in the nsh1 line (Figure 3A) was 25 times higher than that of 5mC in the cda background (Figure 2A), probably because 5mU was also directly released from RNA degradation of m5U-containing RNA. In plants, TRM2A and TRM2B have been postulated to be m5U writer enzymes due to sequence similarity to TRM2 from yeast (25), but it has not yet been experimentally addressed if TRM2A and TRM2B are actually involved in RNA modification. We observed that m5U abundance in total RNA was 36% and 42% lower in 20-day-old trm2a and trm2b seedlings (trm2a, SALK_085796; trm2b, SALK_106689; Supplementary Figure S5) while the double mutant even had a reduction by 93% compared with the wild type (Figure 5E), showing that indeed TRM2A and TRM2B play an important role in uridine methylation of RNA. Then we raised the question of whether the NSH1 substrate 5mU is directly derived from methylated RNA. For this, we quantified 5mU in Col-0, nsh1 and nsh1 trm2a seedlings and observed a 36% decrease of this compound in nsh1 trm2a plants compared with the single mutant of NSH1 (Figure 5F). In line with the 25-fold stronger accumulation of 5mU in nsh1 compared with 5mC in cda background, the data demonstrate that 5mU is derived not only from the deamination of 5mC but to a great extent directly from the turnover of m5U-containing RNA in vivo. About 1% of uridines are 5-methylated in RNA (Figure 5E), thus we show that m5U is a fairly abundant RNA modification in plants.
NSH1 protects RNA from m5U misincorporation
As demonstrated above, several modified nucleosides accumulate in the cda or nsh1 background (Figures 2 and 3). The highest amounts were observed for 5mC and 2OmC in cda and 5mU in nsh1. If such relatively abundant methylated pyrimidine nucleosides become phosphorylated to their corresponding triphosphates, they might represent substrates for RNA polymerases, leading to random methylation in newly synthesized RNA. Because RNA methylations are normally introduced at specific sites by writer proteins, such random methylation could disturb RNA function. Therefore, the catabolism of modified nucleosides by CDA and NSH1 might be important to protect RNA from misincorporation of methylated nucleotides. To assess if 5mU can be phosphorylated in vivo, we quantified the 5-methyl-UTP (5mUTP) content in 20-day-old seedlings of the wild type, the nsh1 line and the complementation line. 5mUTP was detected in nsh1 seedlings but not in the wild type or the complementation line (Figure 6A). This shows that nucleoside and nucleotide kinases are able to phosphorylate 5mU to 5mUTP in vivo. Corresponding phosphorylation products of 5mC or 2OmC were not detected maybe because these nucleosides are at least 10-fold less abundant than 5mU in the respective mutants.
Figure 6.
5mUTP accumulation and m5U frequency in different RNA species from Arabidopsis leaves varying in NSH1 expression and selectivity of RNA polymerase II for UTP versus 5mUTP. (A) 5mUTP content in 20-day-old seedlings of the wild type (Col-0), the nsh1 line (light blue) and the complementation line. Error bars are the SD (n = 4 biological replicates). The detection limit of 5mUTP was 50 pg on column. n.d., not detectable. fw, fresh weight. (B) m5U frequency relative to U in total RNA, non-polyadenylated RNA (rRNA and tRNA) and mRNA of 20-day-old seedlings of the wild type (Col-0; white), the nsh1 line (light orange) and the complementation line (dark orange). Error bars are the SD (n = 6 biological replicates). Different letters label data that are significantly different at P < 0.05. (C) Relative incorporation of m5U referred to U into mRNA (output) synthesized in vitro by RNA polymerase II using a commercial HeLa cell transcription assay at varying input ratios of 5mUTP/UTP. Error bars are the SD (n = 4 independent transcription reactions).
To test whether 5mUTP can be a substrate of RNA polymerases in vivo, the m5U/U ratios were measured in mRNA, rRNA + tRNA, and total RNA from the wild type, nsh1 and the complementation line. In total RNA or in tRNA + rRNA, the m5U/U ratios were the same in all genotypes (Figure 6B). However, in highly purified mRNA, the m5U/U ratio was significantly elevated in nsh1 (mean: 0.047%) compared with the wild type or the complementation line (mean: 0.002%) (Figure 6B). That the m5U content of mRNA was increased in the nsh1 background indicated that 5mUTP is a substrate for RNA polymerase II. We investigated the selectivity of a eukaryotic RNA polymerase II for UTP versus 5mUTP, using an in vitro transcription assay employing HeLa cell extracts. A pre-set substrate ratio of 5mUTP to UTP was reflected in almost the same ratio in the RNA product (Figure 6C), showing that RNA polymerase II uses UTP and 5mUTP almost equally well. Thus, human RNA polymerase II must be protected from 5mUTP because it is not selective against this modified nucleotide. The same might be the case for RNA polymerase II from Arabidopsis since we measured more m5U in mRNA of nsh1, which accumulates some 5mUTP. However, the selectivity of uridine kinases and uridine monophosphate kinases (uridylate kinases) for non-methylated substrates appears to suppress the production of 5mUTP, because in the nsh1 background there is far less 5mUTP (0.076 nmol/g; Figure 6A) than 5mU (21.5 nmol/g; Figure 3A). Nonetheless, by degrading 5mU, NSH1 prevents the accumulation of this aberrant nucleoside and of 5mUTP. Together with the kinases, NSH1 thereby protects the mRNA from random incorporation of m5U. A similar scenario has been described for protecting RNA and DNA from random accumulation of m6A in Arabidopsis and mammalian cells (11,49,50).
We also measured the m5C/C and Cm/C ratios in total RNA, rRNA + tRNA and highly purified mRNA, and the 5mC/dC ratio in DNA from the wild type, the two cda mutants and the complementation line. However, we did not detect significant differences in these ratios for any of the genotypes (Supplementary Figure S6). Unlike NSH1, CDA does not seem to play a role in protecting the nucleic acids.
Seedling growth is reduced in the NSH1 mutant
To investigate the biological consequences of compromised uridine and 5mU degradation, we assessed the physiological performance of the wild type, nsh1 and the complementation line throughout their life cycles. While there were no apparent differences between the genotypes at later growth stages, many nsh1 seedlings appeared smaller than those of the wild type or the complementation line early in development (Figure 7A). We selected 7-day-old seedlings (days after imbibition) grown on half-strength MS medium to quantify this phenotype. The mean seedling size was reduced in nsh1 compared with the wild type or the complementation line (Figure 7B, top panel). We suspected that the partially hampered seedling development in nsh1 might be caused by the misincorporation of m5U into RNA (Figure 6B). To test this hypothesis, seedlings were grown on half-strength MS medium supplemented with 0.5 μg/ml 5mU or 5 μg/ml uridine. Supplementation with 5mU suppressed the growth of nsh1 ∼27% more than it suppressed the growth of the wild type each relative to the control without 5mU in the medium (Figure 7C), whereas the 10-fold quantity of uridine in the medium did not lead to stronger growth depression of nsh1 compared with the other genotypes relative to controls on media without supplements. Consistent with a negative effect on growth of 5mU, the wild type and the complementation line also appeared slightly smaller when grown on 5mU-containing media (Figure 7B), but not when grown in the presence of uridine. The 5mU content rose exclusively in nsh1 seedlings by the external supply of this methylated nucleoside (Figure 7D). The elevated 5mU concentration was reflected in an ∼10-fold higher m5U/U ratio in mRNA (mean: 0.40%) for seedlings grown in the presence of 5mU relative to seedlings grown in the absence of this compound (compare Figures 6B and 7E). In addition, the m5U/U ratios in the total RNA and rRNA + tRNA pools isolated from nsh1 seedlings grown in the presence of 5mU were also elevated relative to the ratios seen in the wild type and the complementation line. This indicates that RNA polymerases catalyzing tRNA/rRNA biosynthesis are also capable of using 5mUTP. Furthermore, all RNA species from all genotypes grown on medium containing 5mU had higher m5U levels than those grown on half-strength MS medium alone (compare Figures 6B and 7E). Taken together, 5mU degradation by NSH1 appears to be a necessary house-cleaning reaction to prevent random RNA methylation at C5 of uridine. The data suggest that such RNA modifications negatively affect seedling establishment, although other reasons, for example metabolic alterations in nsh1, cannot be excluded as causes for the phenotypic alterations in this mutant.
DISCUSSION
Modified nucleosides occur naturally in RNA and DNA. We asked the question of how methylated (deoxy) pyrimidine nucleotides re-enter canonical nucleotide metabolism when nucleic acids are degraded in A. thaliana and have summarized our findings in a model (Figure 8). The data show that plant RNAs contain m5U, which has also been reported for other organisms (2). Additionally, we show that TRM2A and TRM2B are required for m5U modifications of RNA. In S. cerevisiae there is only one TRM2 gene and the corresponding enzyme is responsible for the methylation of uridine 54 (U54) in tRNAs (51). The function of TRM2A and TRM2B of plants has been predicted using the homology to the yeast enzyme (25), but so far their function in plants has not been investigated. There are also two TRM2 genes in humans, with TRM2A recently shown to be responsible for the majority of m5U modifications in RNA targeting mainly U54 of cytosolic tRNAs (43), while TRM2B is located in mitochondria targeting U54 of mitochondrial tRNAs as well as 12S rRNA (26). Our results show that in Arabidopsis, TRM2A and TRM2B contribute equally to m5U methylation of RNA (Figure 5E). Together they are responsible for most such modifications which we speculate might also involve methylation of U54 of tRNAs but will probably also include rRNA targets. Upon RNA degradation, 5mU is released and the corresponding deoxynucleoside (dT) is derived from DNA turnover and repair (Figure 8). Both are substrates of NSH1, which generates thymine, a canonical nucleobase that can enter pyrimidine ring catabolism (34), and ribose or deoxyribose from these substrates. Notably, thymine is mostly derived from 5mU and, therefore, from RNA and not from DNA degradation (Figures 3A, B and 4A). In mammals and other eukaryotes, it has not yet been investigated how 5mC and 5mU from RNA degradation are metabolized, although the requirement to dispose of these modified nucleosides will probably be the same as in plants. The enzymatic makeup of pyrimidine nucleoside and nucleobase catabolism in plants and mammals is very similar (Supplementary Figure S1). Mammalian uridine phosphorylases release the base from the corresponding pyrimidine nucleoside, which in plants is the function of NSH1. Surprisingly, it has not yet been investigated if 5mU is a relevant substrate of eukaryotic uridine phosphorylases—either in vitro or in vivo. It is thus possible that compromised activity of this enzyme will lead to accumulation of 5mU, which may be of significant relevance to understand the physiological consequences of uridine phosphorylase deficiency in mammals.
Figure 8.
Pyrimidine methylation of RNA and DNA in Arabidopsis produces methylated nucleosides upon nucleic acid catabolism that enter different degradation pathways. Enzymatic reactions promoted in the mutant of NSH1 are shown by red dashed arrows. Question marks indicate unresolved issues regarding the metabolic fate.
Recently, it has been reported that m5C is also present in plant RNAs (6), and it has long been known that DNA contains methylated dC (52). The methylated cytidines, 5mC and 2OmC from RNA degradation and 5mdC from DNA breakdown, are all in vivo substrates of CDA and are converted to the respective uridines (Figures 1 and 2). Two of the products, 5mU and dT, are then substrates of NSH1 and are hydrolyzed to thymine and ribose or 2-deoxyribose, respectively. Our data suggest that only 4% of 5mU is derived from 5mC because in nsh1 seedlings there is 25-fold more 5mU than there is 5mC in the cda background (Figures 2A and 3A). Although the quantitative aspects of these data should not be overinterpreted, they do show that a large proportion of 5mU is derived directly from RNA without a 5mC intermediate. Interestingly, 2OmC is an in vivo substrate of CDA but the resulting 2OmU, which can also be directly derived from RNA, is not degraded by NSH1 either in vitro or in vivo. This suggests that plants possess a so far unknown enzyme for the demethylation of 2OmU. The methylation of (deoxy)ribose at the OH-group at carbon 2 is widespread and found in prokaryotes and eukaryotes (53,54), but enzymes that remove this methylation have not yet been described in any organism.
For canonical (deoxy)nucleosides, it has been shown that their concentrations impact on the amounts of (deoxy)nucleotides (20,55,56). However, the kinases that connect these metabolite pools are probably selective against modified nucleosides and nucleotides, which has been observed for adenylate kinases that phosphorylate AMP far better than N6-mAMP (11). Here we show that 5mU can be converted to 5mUTP, when the methylated nucleoside accumulates in the nsh1 background, and that 5mUTP represents a good substrate for RNA polymerase II in vitro. We assume that this is also the case in vivo, resulting in significantly elevated m5U levels in mRNA (Figure 6; Figure 8, reactions occurring only in the nsh1 mutant background are depicted by red dashed arrows). That RNA polymerases can use 5-substituted UTPs is well known and can be exploited for biotechnological applications (57). Interestingly, in vivo labeling of RNA in HeLa cells was only possible with 5-azide-substituted UTP but not with the corresponding nucleosides, suggesting that the aberrant nucleosides are not well recognized by the kinases that convert uridine to UTP, whereas the RNA polymerase is able to accept the modified UTP (58).
It is known that the mutant of NSH1 has an increased content of several nucleosides and nucleotides (20,22–24,55). We observed a reduced growth performance of the mutant at the seedling stage, which could be due to the metabolic disturbance in this genetic background. However, the defect in growth was specifically aggravated by cultivating the nsh1 plants on medium containing 5mU but not by growing them on medium containing 10-fold more uridine. Therefore, the nsh1 growth phenotype seems rather to be associated with random m5U incorporation into RNA, which became more prominent upon 5mU feeding (Figure 7), than with other metabolic alterations. By supplementing 5mU from outside to the nsh1 mutant, we could detect elevated amounts of m5U in rRNA and tRNA, showing that in principle this modified nucleoside can find its way into these RNAs in vivo (Figure 7D, E). However, given the stochastic nature of aberrant m5U modification in RNA species in nsh1, it is at this stage impossible to demonstrate that the growth phenotype is caused by RNA alterations.
In summary we show that the function of NSH1 is not merely to recycle nutrients but also to protect RNA from random methylation. Such a role cannot be postulated for CDA because CDA mutants were unchanged in terms of RNA methylation and growth. NSH1 and CDA are required for the catabolism of several methylated pyrimidine nucleosides, but not for all modified pyrimidines that occur in vivo. For example, 2′-O-methylated uridine is not a substrate of NSH1, and N4-acetylcytidine is not catabolized by CDA, suggesting that there must be other currently unknown catabolic enzymes for these compounds. Many other modified nucleosides, such as N1-methyladenosine and 7-methylguanosine, also occur in RNA. Elucidating the metabolism of these nucleosides will be an interesting future challenge. For plants, our data highlight that the metabolism of RNA degradation products can be critical beyond preventing (deoxy)nucleotide imbalance (20,42) or compromising nucleobase and nucleoside salvage. Since there are many similarities in pyrimidine catabolism between eukaryotes, this issue needs to be explored for other organisms, in particular humans.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors thank Professor Honggui La for kindly sharing cmt3-11 and ros1-4 mutant seeds, Jialei Wang for help with mass spectrometry analyses, and Peng Liu for assistance with seedling phenotype analyses.
Author contributions: M.C. and C.-P.W. conceived the research. S.G., Y.S., X.C., C.Z., X.L., W.W., L.G. and Y.L. performed the experiments. M.C., M.H., F.S. and C.-P.W. analyzed the data, and M.C. and C.-P.W. wrote the manuscript. All authors proofread and agreed with the manuscript.
Contributor Information
Shangyu Gao, College of Life Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.
Yu Sun, College of Life Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.
Xiaoguang Chen, Department of Molecular Nutrition and Biochemistry of Plants, Institute of Plant Nutrition, Leibniz University Hannover, Herrenhäuser Str. 2, D-30419 Hannover, Germany.
Changhua Zhu, College of Life Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.
Xiaoye Liu, Department of Criminal Science and Technology, Nanjing Forest Police College, Nanjing 210023, China.
Wenlei Wang, College of Life Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.
Lijun Gan, College of Life Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.
Yanwu Lu, College of Life Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.
Frank Schaarschmidt, Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Cell Biology and Biophysics, Leibniz University Hannover, Herrenhäuser Str. 2, D-30419 Hannover, Germany.
Marco Herde, Department of Molecular Nutrition and Biochemistry of Plants, Institute of Plant Nutrition, Leibniz University Hannover, Herrenhäuser Str. 2, D-30419 Hannover, Germany.
Claus-Peter Witte, Department of Molecular Nutrition and Biochemistry of Plants, Institute of Plant Nutrition, Leibniz University Hannover, Herrenhäuser Str. 2, D-30419 Hannover, Germany.
Mingjia Chen, College of Life Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.
Data Availability
All experimental data are available in the main text or in the Supplementary data. Expression plasmids and mutant lines are available on reasonable request from the authors. Sequence data from this article can be found under the following accession/locus numbers: At2g19570 (CDA), At2g36310 (NSH1), At3g17810 (PYD1), At2g22400 (TRM4B), At3g21300 (TRM2A), At2g28450 (TRM2B), At1g69770 (CMT3) and At2g36490 (ROS1).
SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Supplementary Data are available at NAR Online.
FUNDING
The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [YDZX2023013]; the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [CH2292/1-1 to M.C. and C.-P.W., WI3411/8-1 and INST 187/741-1 FUGG to C.-P. W., and HE-5949/4-1 to M.H.]; the International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology [CRP/CHN20-04_EC]; the National Natural Science Foundation of China [31900907]; the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China [BK20190528]; and Nanjing Agricultural University [start-up fund for advanced talents to M.C.]. Funding for open access charge: Nanjing Agricultural University, China.
Conflict of interest statement. None declared.
REFERENCES
- 1. Chou H.-J., Donnard E., Gustafsson H.T., Garber M., Rando O.J.. Transcriptome-wide analysis of roles for tRNA modifications in translational regulation. Mol. Cell. 2017; 68:978–992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. McCown P.J., Ruszkowska A., Kunkler C.N., Breger K., Hulewicz J.P., Wang M.C., Springer N.A., Brown J.A.. Naturally occurring modified ribonucleosides. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA. 2020; 11:e1595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Zhong S., Li H., Bodi Z., Button J., Vespa L., Herzog M., Fray R.G.. MTA is an Arabidopsis messenger RNA adenosine methylase and interacts with a homolog of a sex-specific splicing factor. Plant Cell. 2008; 20:1278–1288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Dominissini D., Moshitch-Moshkovitz S., Schwartz S., Salmon-Divon M., Ungar L., Osenberg S., Cesarkas K., Jacob-Hirsch J., Amariglio N., Kupiec M.et al.. Topology of the human and mouse m6A RNA methylomes revealed by m6A-seq. Nature. 2012; 485:201–206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Dominissini D., Nachtergaele S., Moshitch-Moshkovitz S., Peer E., Kol N., Ben-Haim M.S., Dai Q., Di Segni A., Salmon-Divon M., Clark W.C.et al.. The dynamic N1-methyladenosine methylome in eukaryotic messenger RNA. Nature. 2016; 530:441–446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Cui X., Liang Z., Shen L., Zhang Q., Bao S., Geng Y., Zhang B., Leo V., Vardy L.A., Lu T.et al.. 5-Methylcytosine RNA methylation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Plant. 2017; 10:1387–1399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Arango D., Sturgill D., Alhusaini N., Dillman A.A., Sweet T.J., Hanson G., Hosogane M., Sinclair W.R., Nanan K.K., Mandler M.D.et al.. Acetylation of cytidine in mRNA promotes translation efficiency. Cell. 2018; 175:1872–1886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Carlile T.M., Rojas-Duran M.F., Zinshteyn B., Shin H., Bartoli K.M., Gilbert W.V.. Pseudouridine profiling reveals regulated mRNA pseudouridylation in yeast and human cells. Nature. 2014; 515:143–146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Gilbert W.V., Bell T.A., Schaening C.. Messenger RNA modifications. Form, distribution, and function. Science. 2016; 352:1408–1412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Frye M., Harada B.T., Behm M., He C.. RNA modifications modulate gene expression during development. Science. 2018; 361:1346–1349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Chen M., Urs M.J., Sánchez-González I., Olayioye M.A., Herde M., Witte C.-P.. m6A RNA degradation products are catabolized by an evolutionarily conserved N6-methyl-AMP deaminase in plant and mammalian cells. Plant Cell. 2018; 30:1511–1522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Witte C.-P., Herde M.. Nucleotide metabolism in plants. Plant Physiol. 2020; 182:63–78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Chen M., Witte C.-P.. A kinase and a glycosylase catabolize pseudouridine in the peroxisome to prevent toxic pseudouridine monophosphate accumulation. Plant Cell. 2020; 32:722–739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Kim S.-H., Witte C.-P., Rhee S.. Structural basis for the substrate specificity and catalytic features of pseudouridine kinase from Arabidopsis thaliana. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021; 49:491–503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Sekula P., Dettmer K., Vogl F.C., Gronwald W., Ellmann L., Mohney R.P., Eckardt K.-U., Suhre K., Kastenmüller G., Oefner P.J.et al.. From discovery to translation: characterization of C-mannosyltryptophan and pseudouridine as markers of kidney function. Sci. Rep. 2017; 7:17400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Yang X., Yang Y., Sun B.-F., Chen Y.-S., Xu J.-W., Lai W.-Y., Li A., Wang X., Bhattarai D.P., Xiao W.et al.. 5-methylcytosine promotes mRNA export—NSUN2 as the methyltransferase and ALYREF as an m5C reader. Cell Res. 2017; 27:606–625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. David R., Burgess A., Parker B., Li J., Pulsford K., Sibbritt T., Preiss T., Searle I.R.. Transcriptome-wide mapping of RNA 5-methylcytosine in Arabidopsis mRNAs and noncoding RNAs. Plant Cell. 2017; 29:445–460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Tang Y., Gao C.-C., Gao Y., Yang Y., Shi B., Yu J.-L., Lyu C., Sun B.-F., Wang H.-L., Xu Y.et al.. OsNSUN2-mediated 5-methylcytosine mRNA modification enhances rice adaptation to high temperature. Dev. Cell. 2020; 53:272–286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Pfaff C., Ehrnsberger H.F., Flores-Tornero M., Sørensen B.B., Schubert T., Längst G., Griesenbeck J., Sprunck S., Grasser M., Grasser K.D.. ALY RNA-binding proteins are required for nucleocytosolic mRNA transport and modulate plant growth and development. Plant Physiol. 2018; 177:226–240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Straube H., Niehaus M., Zwittian S., Witte C.-P., Herde M.. Enhanced nucleotide analysis enables the quantification of deoxynucleotides in plants and algae revealing connections between nucleoside and deoxynucleoside metabolism. Plant Cell. 2021; 33:270–289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Chen M., Herde M., Witte C.-P.. Of the nine cytidine deaminase-like genes in Arabidopsis, eight are pseudogenes and only one is required to maintain pyrimidine homeostasis in vivo. Plant Physiol. 2016; 171:799–809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Jung B., Floerchinger M., Kunz H.-H., Traub M., Wartenberg R., Jeblick W., Neuhaus H.E., Moehlmann T.. Uridine-ribohydrolase is a key regulator in the uridine degradation pathway of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2009; 21:876–891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Riegler H., Geserick C., Zrenner R.. Arabidopsis thaliana nucleosidase mutants provide new insights into nucleoside degradation. New Phytol. 2011; 191:349–359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Jung B., Hoffmann C., Moehlmann T.. Arabidopsis nucleoside hydrolases involved in intracellular and extracellular degradation of purines. Plant J. 2011; 65:703–711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Wang Y., Pang C., Li X., Hu Z., Lv Z., Zheng B., Chen P.. Identification of tRNA nucleoside modification genes critical for stress response and development in rice and Arabidopsis. BMC Plant Biol. 2017; 17:261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Powell C.A., Minczuk M.. TRMT2B is responsible for both tRNA and rRNA m5U-methylation in human mitochondria. RNA Biol. 2020; 17:451–462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Tardu M., Jones J.D., Kennedy R.T., Lin Q., Koutmou K.S.. Identification and quantification of modified nucleosides in Saccharomyces cerevisiae mRNAs. ACS Chem. Biol. 2019; 14:1403–1409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Cheng Q.-Y., Xiong J., Ma C.-J., Dai Y., Ding J.-H., Liu F.-L., Yuan B.-F., Feng Y.-Q.. Chemical tagging for sensitive determination of uridine modifications in RNA. Chem. Sci. 2020; 11:1878–1891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Vincenzetti S., Cambi A., Neuhard J., Garattini E., Vita A.. Recombinant human cytidine deaminase: expression, purification, and characterization. Protein Expr. Purif. 1996; 8:247–253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Cao D., Leffert J.J., McCabe J., Kim B., Pizzorno G.. Abnormalities in uridine homeostatic regulation and pyrimidine nucleotide metabolism as a consequence of the deletion of the uridine phosphorylase gene. J. Biol. Chem. 2005; 280:21169–21175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Le T.T., Ziemba A., Urasaki Y., Hayes E., Brotman S., Pizzorno G.. Disruption of uridine homeostasis links liver pyrimidine metabolism to lipid accumulation. J. Lipid Res. 2013; 54:1044–1057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. López L.C., Akman H.O., García-Cazorla A., Dorado B., Martí R., Nishino I., Tadesse S., Pizzorno G., Shungu D., Bonilla E.et al.. Unbalanced deoxynucleotide pools cause mitochondrial DNA instability in thymidine phosphorylase-deficient mice. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2009; 18:714–722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. van Kuilenburg A.B.P., Meinsma R., Beke E., Assmann B., Ribes A., Lorente I., Busch R., Mayatepek E., Abeling N.G.G.M., van Cruchten A.et al.. Beta-ureidopropionase deficiency: an inborn error of pyrimidine degradation associated with neurological abnormalities. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2004; 13:2793–2801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Zrenner R., Riegler H., Marquard C.R., Lange P.R., Geserick C., Bartosz C.E., Chen C.T., Slocum R.D.. A functional analysis of the pyrimidine catabolic pathway in Arabidopsis. New Phytol. 2009; 183:117–132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Alonso J.M., Stepanova A.N., Leisse T.J., Kim C.J., Chen H.M., Shinn P., Stevenson D.K., Zimmerman J., Barajas P., Cheuk R.et al.. Genome-wide insertional mutagenesis of Arabidopsis thaliana. Science. 2003; 301:653–657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Sessions A., Burke E., Presting G., Aux G., McElver J., Patton D., Dietrich B., Ho P., Bacwaden J., Ko C.et al.. A high-throughput Arabidopsis reverse genetics system. Plant Cell. 2002; 14:2985–2994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Kleinboelting N., Huep G., Kloetgen A., Viehoever P., Weisshaar B.. GABI-Kat SimpleSearch: new features of the Arabidopsis thaliana T-DNA mutant database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012; 40:D1211–D1215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Baccolini C., Witte C.-P.. AMP and GMP catabolism in Arabidopsis converge on xanthosine, which is degraded by a nucleoside hydrolase heterocomplex. Plant Cell. 2019; 31:734–751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Witte C.P., Medina-Escobar N.. In-gel detection of urease with nitroblue tetrazolium and quantification of the enzyme from different crop plants using the indophenol reaction. Anal Biochem. 2001; 290:102–107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Frances A., Cordelier P.. The emerging role of cytidine deaminase in human diseases: a new opportunity for therapy. Mol. Ther. 2020; 28:357–366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Gemble S., Buhagiar-Labarchède G., Onclercq-Delic R., Biard D., Lambert S., Amor-Guéret M.. A balanced pyrimidine pool is required for optimal Chk1 activation to prevent ultrafine anaphase bridge formation. J. Cell. Sci. 2016; 129:3167–3177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Gemble S., Ahuja A., Buhagiar-Labarchède G., Onclercq-Delic R., Dairou J., Biard D.S.F., Lambert S., Lopes M., Amor-Guéret M.. Pyrimidine pool disequilibrium induced by a cytidine deaminase deficiency inhibits PARP-1 activity, leading to the under replication of DNA. PLoS Genet. 2015; 11:e1005384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Carter J.-M., Emmett W., Mozos I.R., Kotter A., Helm M., Ule J., Hussain S.. FICC-Seq: a method for enzyme-specified profiling of methyl-5-uridine in cellular RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; 47:e113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Cornelius S., Witz S., Rolletschek H., Möhlmann T.. Pyrimidine degradation influences germination seedling growth and production of Arabidopsis seeds. J. Exp. Bot. 2011; 62:5623–5632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Roldán-Arjona T., Ariza R.R., Córdoba-Cañero D. DNA base excision repair in plants: an unfolding story with familiar and novel characters. Front. Plant Sci. 2019; 10:1055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Kong W., Li B., Wang Q., Wang B., Duan X., Ding L., Lu Y., Liu L.-W., La H.. Analysis of the DNA methylation patterns and transcriptional regulation of the NB-LRR-encoding gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol. Biol. 2018; 96:563–575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Forgione I., Wołoszyńska M., Pacenza M., Chiappetta A., Greco M., Araniti F., Abenavoli M.R., van Lijsebettens M., Bitonti M.B., Bruno L.. Hypomethylated drm1 drm2 cmt3 mutant phenotype of Arabidopsis thaliana is related to auxin pathway impairment. Plant Sci. 2019; 280:383–396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Li J., Yang D.-L., Huang H., Zhang G., He L., Pang J., Lozano-Durán R., Lang Z., Zhu J.-K.. Epigenetic memory marks determine epiallele stability at loci targeted by de novo DNA methylation. Nat. Plants. 2020; 6:661–674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Musheev M.U., Baumgärtner A., Krebs L., Niehrs C.. The origin of genomic N6-methyl-deoxyadenosine in mammalian cells. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2020; 16:630–634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Liu X., Lai W., Li Y., Chen S., Liu B., Zhang N., Mo J., Lyu C., Zheng J., Du Y.-R.et al.. N6-methyladenine is incorporated into mammalian genome by DNA polymerase. Cell Res. 2021; 31:94–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Nordlund M.E., Johansson J.O., von Pawel-Rammingen U., Byström A.S.. Identification of the TRM2 gene encoding the tRNA(m5U54) methyltransferase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. RNA. 2000; 6:844–860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Zhang H., Lang Z., Zhu J.-K.. Dynamics and function of DNA methylation in plants. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2018; 19:489–506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Azevedo-Favory J., Gaspin C., Ayadi L., Montacié C., Marchand V., Jobet E., Rompais M., Carapito C., Motorin Y., Sáez-Vásquez J.. Mapping rRNA 2'-O-methylations and identification of C/D snoRNAs in Arabidopsis thaliana plants. RNA Biol. 2021; 18:1760–1777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Ramakrishnan M., Rajan K.S., Mullasseri S., Palakkal S., Kalpana K., Sharma A., Zhou M., Vinod K.K., Ramasamy S., Wei Q.. The plant epitranscriptome: revisiting pseudouridine and 2'-O-methyl RNA modifications. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2022; 20:1241–1256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Heinemann K.J., Yang S.-Y., Straube H., Medina-Escobar N., Varbanova-Herde M., Herde M., Rhee S., Witte C.-P.. Initiation of cytosolic plant purine nucleotide catabolism involves a monospecific xanthosine monophosphate phosphatase. Nat. Commun. 2021; 12:6846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Chen X., Kim S.-H., Rhee S., Witte C.-P.. A plastid nucleoside kinase is involved in inosine salvage and control of purine nucleotide biosynthesis. Plant Cell. 2023; 35:510–528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Milisavljevič N., Perlíková P., Pohl R., Hocek M.. Enzymatic synthesis of base-modified RNA by T7 RNA polymerase. A systematic study and comparison of 5-substituted pyrimidine and 7-substituted 7-deazapurine nucleoside triphosphates as substrates. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2018; 16:5800–5807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Sawant A.A., Tanpure A.A., Mukherjee P.P., Athavale S., Kelkar A., Galande S., Srivatsan S.G.. A versatile toolbox for posttranscriptional chemical labeling and imaging of RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016; 44:e16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All experimental data are available in the main text or in the Supplementary data. Expression plasmids and mutant lines are available on reasonable request from the authors. Sequence data from this article can be found under the following accession/locus numbers: At2g19570 (CDA), At2g36310 (NSH1), At3g17810 (PYD1), At2g22400 (TRM4B), At3g21300 (TRM2A), At2g28450 (TRM2B), At1g69770 (CMT3) and At2g36490 (ROS1).








