Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The British Journal of Ophthalmology logoLink to The British Journal of Ophthalmology
. 1988 Dec;72(12):881–889. doi: 10.1136/bjo.72.12.881

Early trabeculectomy versus conventional management in primary open angle glaucoma.

J L Jay 1, S B Murray 1
PMCID: PMC1041614  PMID: 3067743

Abstract

The results of a randomised, prospective, multicentre trial of the management of primary open angle glaucoma are presented at up to five years' follow up. Previously undiagnosed cases were selected with intraocular pressure of 26 mmHg or more on two occasions together with field loss characteristic of glaucoma. Analysis was performed on one eye selected at random from each of 99 patients. Conventional medical treatment followed in unsuccessful cases by trabeculectomy (group A) was compared with trabeculectomy at diagnosis followed when necessary by supplementary medical therapy (group B). The life expectancy of these glaucoma patients was found to be similar to that for the local population matched for age and sex. In group A after four years trabeculectomy had been performed in 53% of eyes because medical management had failed to control the disease. The rate of operation was lower in those patients with intraocular pressure less than 31 mmHg and mild relative field loss (17% at three years) than in those with intraocular pressure greater than 30 mmHg and dense scotomas (75% at three years). Early surgery provided much more stable control with fewer changes in treatment than in group A. The group mean intraocular pressure after trabeculectomy was 15.0 mmHg irrespective of the time of operation, and this was significantly lower than the intraocular pressure in those cases thought to be controlled on medical therapy alone at the end of the first year (20.8 mmHg). Early operation provided significantly better protection of visual field, and the extra loss of visual field with delayed operation occurred in the preoperative period. Changes in visual fields were not related to the use of miotics. There was no significant difference in the final visual acuity in the two groups, but six cases in group A lost central fixation because of progressive loss of visual field, and there were no such cases in group B. Cataract occurred in approximately 10% of cases in both groups, but in group A this happened with only half the number of operations and at a shorter postoperative follow-up than in group B. It appears that in cases of primary open angle glaucoma of this severity the risk of delaying operation are significantly greater than those of performing trabeculectomy as the primary treatment.

Full text

PDF
881

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Armaly M. F. Lessons to be learned from the Collaborative Glaucoma Study. Surv Ophthalmol. 1980 Nov-Dec;25(3):139–144. doi: 10.1016/0039-6257(80)90089-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gilbert C. M., Brown R. H., Lynch M. G. The effect of argon laser trabeculoplasty on the rate of filtering surgery. Ophthalmology. 1986 Mar;93(3):362–365. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(86)33734-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Granström P. A. Glaucoma patients not compliant with their drug therapy: clinical and behavioural aspects. Br J Ophthalmol. 1982 Jul;66(7):464–470. doi: 10.1136/bjo.66.7.464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Jay J. L. Earlier trabeculectomy. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K. 1983;103(Pt 1):35–38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jay J. L., Murray S. B. Characteristics of reduction of intraocular pressure after trabeculectomy. Br J Ophthalmol. 1980 Jun;64(6):432–435. doi: 10.1136/bjo.64.6.432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kidd M. N., O'Connor M. Progression of field loss after trabeculectomy: a five-year follow-up. Br J Ophthalmol. 1985 Nov;69(11):827–831. doi: 10.1136/bjo.69.11.827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. MacKean J. M., Elkington A. R. Compliance with treatment of patients with chronic open-angle glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1983 Jan;67(1):46–49. doi: 10.1136/bjo.67.1.46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Migdal C., Hitchings R. Control of chronic simple glaucoma with primary medical, surgical and laser treatment. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K. 1986;105(Pt 6):653–656. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Murray S. B., Jay J. L. Trabeculectomy. Its role in the management of glaucoma. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K. 1979;99(4):492–494. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Richler M., Werner E. B., Thomas D. Risk factors for progression of visual field defects in medically treated patients with glaucoma. Can J Ophthalmol. 1982 Dec;17(6):245–248. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Smith R. J. Medical versus surgical therapy in glaucoma simplex. Br J Ophthalmol. 1972 Mar;56(3):277–283. doi: 10.1136/bjo.56.3.277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Smith R. J. The Lang lecture 1986. The enigma of primary open-angle glaucoma. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K. 1986;105(Pt 6):618–633. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES