Abstract
Elucidation of genome size (GS), genetic and phenotypic variation is the fundamental aspect of crop improvement programs. Mulberry is a cross-pollinated, highly heterozygous tree eudicot, and comprised of huge ploidy variation with great adaptability across the world. However, because of inadequate information on GS, ploidy-associated traits, as well as the correlation between genetic and phenotypic variation hinder the further improvement of mulberry. In this present research, a core set of 157 germplasm accessions belonging to eight accepted species of Morus including promising functional varieties were chosen to represent the genetic spectrum from the whole germplasm collection. To estimate the GS, accessions were subjected to flow cytometry (FCM) analysis and the result suggested that four different ploidies (2n = 2x, 3x, 4x, and 6x) with GS ranging from 0.72±0.005pg (S-30) to 2.89±0.015pg (M. serrata), accounting~4.01 fold difference. The predicted polyploidy was further confirmed with metaphase chromosome count. In addition, the genetic variation was estimated by selecting a representative morphologically, diverse population of 82 accessions comprised of all ploidy variations using simple sequence repeats (SSR). The estimated average Polymorphism Information Content (PIC) and expected heterozygosity showed high levels of genetic diversity. Additionally, three populations were identified by the model-based population structure (k = 3) with a moderate level of correlation between the populations and different species of mulberry, which imply the effect of genetic variation instead of ploidy on trait plasticity that could be a consequence of the high level of heterozygosity imposed by natural cross-pollination. Further, the correlation between ploidies, especially diploid and triploid with selected phenotypic traits was identified, however, consistency could not be defined with higher ploidy levels (>3x). Moreover, incite gained here can serve as a platform for future omics approaches to the improvement of mulberry traits.
Introduction
Mulberry (Morus spp.) has been commercially exploited as the host of monophagous pest silkworm, Bombyx mori L. [1, 2]. It belongs to the Moraceae family comprised of 37 genera with more than 1,100 species [3]. The genus Morus has over 10 species with more than 1,000 cultivated varieties spanning Asia, Europe, Africa, and the United States [4, 5]. Efforts were made to classify Morus spp., however, to date, taxonomic nomenclature remains doubtful [6]. Besides that, genetics of inheritance are also complicated in Morus spp. As an account of the occurrence of a higher level of heterozygosity as well as polyploidy (or whole-genome duplication, WGD), one of the most important evolutionary processes in higher plants [7, 8].
Cytology studies in mulberry are more complicated because of extreme variations in chromosome size and number [9]. However, since 1920, various researchers attempt to understand meiotic behaviour, because it’s considered a very important aspect of breeding programmes. Mulberry has a wide range of ploidy ranging from haploid (n = x = 14) to docosaploid (2n = 22x = 308) [4, 10, 11], for example, M. notabilis was reported as “haploid” in nature (2n = 2x = 14, [4]), and diploid (2n = 2x = 28) Morus spp. such as M. alba, M. atropurpurea, M. bombycis, M. indica, M. latifoliaand M. rotundiloba [9]. The majority of triploids (2n = 3x = 42) and tetraploids (2n = 4x = 56) have been identified in M. laevigata [12]. Hexaploid species (2n = 6x = 84), such as M. serrata [13] and M. tiliaefolia [14] are also recognized, and earlier reports also suggest that polyploidy can extend up to docosaploid (2n = 22x = 308) as in M. nigra [10, 11]. The economically important species of mulberry available in India are M. alba, M. indica, M. atropurpurea, M. nigra, M. serrata, M. latifolia, and M. laevigata [13, 15]. Moreover, metaphase chromosome count, detecting the ploidy status, size, and nature of chromosomes and behaviour in pairing and segregation during meiosis has been restricted toa few popular mulberry varieties and polyploid species only like M. serrata, M. tiliaefolia and M. nigra [10, 16–23]. Despite our increasing recognition of the chromosomal number or ploidy level, we are still unaware of the biological effects of ploidy in mulberry. Application of FCM and GS estimations of a large collection of mulberry are missing, which is considered to be a preciseway to generate useful information for the analysis of the genetic relationship, phenotypic diversity, estimation of ploidy-associated traits, and other fundamental aspects of mulberry genomes.
In the last few decades, genetic relationship analysis of mulberry is an important component of crop improvement programs and molecular markers are the most popular to understand the diversity between Morus species [24, 25]. Primarily, Xiang et al. [26] applied the Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) technique to illustrate variation among different species of Morus. Later Inter-Simple Sequence Repeats (ISSR) work has been reported on the genetic diversity analysis amongst the mulberry plants grown in India [24, 27]. Additionally, several restrictions limit the estimation of the genetic diversity of mulberry as highlighted by earlier reports like-(a) lack of sufficient molecular markers in mulberry [28]; and (b) lack of codominant markers to construct the genetic map, which is considered to be a major constraint towards marker-assisted breeding for targeted trait improvement [25, 29]. As mulberry has a highly cross-pollinated heterozygous genome, Simple Sequence Repeats (SSRs) are the most appropriate DNA markers to use for analyzing the genetic diversity of mulberries [28, 30–32]. SSR-based approaches appear to be one of the best DNA markers for detecting genetic diversity within a species for several reasons, especially for revealing high levels of polymorphisms [33]. In Morus spp. SSR markers developed from M. indica are used to illustrate genetic relationships and origin of cultivated mulberry [34]. However, limited studies on SSR markers-based genetic diversity and model-based population structure analysis of a wide collection of mulberry germplasm have been conducted.
In brief, in the present study, we have tried to highlight a few fundamental aspects of mulberry core set collections like (1) variation of GS (FCM-based), (2) genetic diversity (SSR-based), and (3) phenotypic variation (growth-yield and reproductive trait-based) of a wide collection of cross-pollinated, highly heterozygous tree species of genus Morus to develop a model-based population structure and identify ploidy-associated traits. The information generated in the present study may serve as a platform for future omics approaches for the improvement of mulberry traits.
Materials and methods
Plant materials
A total of 157 accessions of the eight different Morus species including popular varieties cultivated in India were used in this study, which was obtained from the core collection maintained at the a). Central Sericultural Germplasm Resources Centre (CSGRC) (csgrc.res.in), Hosur, India; b). Central Sericultural Research and Training Institute (CSRTI), Mysore, India; and3). Karnataka State Sericulture Research and Development Institute, Karnataka, India. The common name, accession number, species name, and place of origin (S1 Table). Accepted nomenclature for the synonymous and unresolved species was considered from The Plant List (theplantlist.org) database (description available in S1 Table). As per The Plant List (theplantlist.org) database, most of the studied germplasm accessions have belonged to accepted eight species viz. M. alba L., M. auastralis Poir., M. cathayana Hemsl., M. indica L., M. macroura Miq., M. nigra L., M. rubra L., and M. serrata Roxb. and remaining species like M. bombycis Koidz. (Synonym of M. auastralis), M. laevigata Wall. ex Brandis (synonym of M. macroura Miq.), M. latifolia Poir. (Synonym of M. alba L.), M. multicaulis Perri. (Synonym of M. alba L.), M. rotundiloba Koidz. (Unresolved), and M. sinensis Loudon. (unresolved) used in this study were identified and merged with the accepted eight species, to avoid taxonomical/classification-related constraints.
Genome size (GS) estimation using flow cytometry (FCM)
To estimate the GS, flow cytometry (FCM) analysis was performed by using the modified protocol as described by Galbraith et al. [35]. For analysis, nuclei were isolated from 40 mg of fresh young leaves (~5 mm2) of mulberry along with the internal reference standard Pisum sativum (2C = 9.09 pg, diploid). The tissue sample was taken in a Petri dish comprised of 2 ml of buffer solution (Hypotonic propidium iodide, 50 μg/ml in 3 g/L trisodium citrate dihydride containing 0.05% (v/v) of non-ionic detergent equivalent (Igepal CA-630) containing 2 mg/mL RNase A) and immediately co-chopped to homogenate using a sharp razor blade for 60 sec at 4°C. The homogenate solution was filtered through a 37 μm nylon filter to remove large debris. Samples were incubated at 37°C for 30 min and FCM analysis was performed using BD LSR Fortessa™ cell analyzer (BD Biosciences). Signals of PI-stained nuclei were processed with an excitation filter and absorbance filter by the flow cytometer. For each accession, three samples were examined and analyzed using BD FACS Diva 8.0.3 Software. GS (in mega base pairs, Mbp) was calculated according to the formulae given by Dolezel et al. [36] [Ploidy = Reference ploidy ×(mean position of the G1 sample peak/mean position of the G1 reference peak)] with the conversion of 1 pg equal to 980 Mbp.
Chromosome number
Besides FCM, metaphase chromosome count was performed to validate FCM data. In brief, shoot tips of 12selected accessions (S2 Table) were collected at 9.30–10.00 AM in 1 ml of saturated p-dichloro benzyne (PDB) with 2 drops of 8-hydroxyquinoline (8HQ) in 1.5 ml Eppendorf. After the shoot collection, meristems were transferred to a 0°C freezer for 5 min and it is subjected to transfer to 4°C for 16-20h. After that, meristems were transferred to ice-cold 3 parts of 100% ethanol: 1 part of glacial acetic acid and incubated at RT for 1h. Then samples were transferred to 4°C for 3 days. After that, samples were incubated with the enzymatic solution comprised of pectinase (2.5% w/v), cellulase (1%), and pectolyase (2%) for 4-6h. Then, samples were transferred to 1% orcine stain for 24h at RT, and during microscopy 2 drops of Acetoorcine stain were used to squash the sample. Chromosome count was performed using Cilika (Madeprime, India) microscope.
Molecular analysis
Eighty-two germplasm were selected based on collection site, open/cross-pollinated hybrid, and breeding information (functional hybrids, natural hybrids, cultivars, etc.) and different ploidy levels covering all available Morus spp. (82 accessions of S1 Table) for genetic diversity analysis. For DNA isolation, 1–2 younger leaves were selected and the modified cetyltrimethylammonium bromide, CTAB method was followed [37]. The quality of genomic DNA was examined by agarose (0.8%) gel electrophoresis and quantified using a Nanodrop DNA quantifier (Thermo Fisher Scientific, NanoDrop 2000 UV-Vis). Reliable and reproducible twenty polymorphic nSSR primer pairs were selected after the screening of 62 nSSR markers for molecular characterization as mentioned by Mathithumilan et al. [28]; and Pinto et al. [29] (Primers in S3 Table). The SSR genotyping was carried out in 10 μl of PCR reaction containing ~50 ng of DNA, 2x PCR Amplicon master mix, and 10 picomoles of SSR primers (Eurofins Pvt. Ltd., Bengaluru) using the PCR program: 94°C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 45sec, specific annealing temperature (50°C to 56°C) for 30 sec, 72°C for 45 sec for extension, and72°C for 8 min for the final extension using a thermal cycler (GeneAmp 9700, Applied Biosystems, USA). The final PCR product was separated on 3% agarose gel containing 0.5μgethidium bromide in 1X TBE buffer and gel images were documented in the gel documentation system (GeneGenius, Syngene, UK). Twenty polymorphic SSR marker data were numerically coded as presence = 1, absence = 0, and missing data were coded as ‘-1’ as suggested in the GenAlExV6.5 user manual [38]. Gel images of twenty polymorphic SSR markers of 49 representative accessions of mulberry are presented in S1 Fig along with the scored SSR data (S4 Table).
Genetic diversity parameters and polymorphism information content (PIC)
Genetic diversity parameters such as the observed number of alleles (Na), the effective number of alleles (Ne), observed heterozygosity (Ho), expected heterozygosity (He), and Shannon’s information index (I) for each SSR marker were computed using POPGENE v. 1.32 [39], while Polymorphism Information Content (PIC) using CERVUS 3.0.7 [40]. Power of discrimination (PD) = 1 − ΣPi2, where Pi = frequency of genotype i, and probability of identity (PI) = 1 − PD for 20 SSR markers was calculated as described by Huang et al. [41]. Whereas, GenAlEx V6.5 was used for species-wise diversity measures i.e. percentage of polymorphic loci (%P), Na, Ne, I, h (diversity) and uh (unbiased diversity), pairwise population matrix of Nei’s genetic distance and pairwise PhiPT values.
Population structure and cluster analysis of Morus using SSR markers
Mulberry germplasm individual molecular data were scored from SSRs banding patterns and STRUCTURE software [42] was used to infer the population structure of 82 mulberry accessions. An admixture model was used with the option of correlating allele frequencies between populations. Tenin dependent runs were conducted for the number of populations (K) ranging from 1 to 12 with 10 iterations for each value of K. The length of burn-in Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) replications was set to 500,000 and data were collected from over 500,000 MCMC replications in each run. We identified the optimal value of K using both the ad hoc procedure described by Pritchard et al. [42] and the method developed by Evanno et al. [43] with the help of Structure Harvester software Earl and Von [44]. Mulberry accessions were assigned to the subpopulations based on the cluster assignment probability (Q). Further cluster analysis of 82 germ plasm was determined using DARWIN software, version 6.0.21 [45]. Principle Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) and Analysis of Molecular Variance (AMOVA) was performed using the software GenAlEx V6.5.
Morphological characters
To correlate phenotypic traits with ploidies, morphologically unique 80 mulberry accessions were chosen to represent the genetic spectrum from the whole germplasm collection. The data was recorded for 9 characters viz. inter-nodal distance (cm), leaf-lamina length (cm), leaf-lamina width (cm), leaf area (sq. cm), petiole length (cm), petiole width (cm), mature inflorescence length (cm), mature fruit length (cm) and mature fruit width (cm) for the two seasons during 2020 and 2021. All the characters were recorded based on DUS test guidelines for Mulberry (plantauthority.gov.in/sites/default/files/mulberry.pdf) and FAO (fao.org/3/AD107E/ad107e0v.htm#TopOfPage). To estimate the inter-nodal distance (InD, cm), the total length of the longest shoot was divided by the total number of nodes after 90 days of pruning. For, leaf-lamina length (LLL, cm) fully grown leaves from the 7th to 9th position in the longest shoot were selected, and measured the leaf blade length from the leaf base at the juncture of the petiole attachment to the leaf tip. Additionally, for leaf-lamina width (LLW, cm), the width of the leaf was taken from the widest point on both sides of the leaf margins. The leaf area (LA, cm2) of the mulberry was measured using a leaf area meter (Biovis PSM L3000). To measure Petiole length (PL, cm), the petiole portion was separated from the base of the leaf blade and measured, and for petiole width (PW, cm), the thickness was measured using Vernier caliper from the same petioles that were used for measuring PL.
To measure the mature inflorescence length (MIL, cm), fully bloomed inflorescence of male (before anthesis), female (at the receptive stage), and bisexual catkins depending upon the sex expression of the accession were used and measure the length including the pedicel of the inflorescence in a minimum of three inflorescence/plant and three plants/accession. For the measurement of mature fruit length (MFL, cm) fruits fully ripened was collected and the length of the full fruit including the peduncle was recorded, whereas for mature fruit width (MFW, cm) thickness was recorded using Vernier calipers. Parameters like Ind, LLA, LLW, LA, PA, and PW were measured after 90 days of pruning, whereas, MIL, MFL, and MFW were measured after 60 days of pruning.
Statistical analysis
The normality test (Shapiro-Wilk test) and homogeneity of variance test (Levene’s test) were carried out (the dependent variable for each group is not normally distributed and variances of the groups are not equal). Kruskal-Wallis H test followed by Dunn’s post hoc tests (p < 0.05) was conducted to know the significance among the ploidy groups. All statistical analyses were carried out using IBM SPSS Statistics 23.0. The descriptive statistics (mean, maximum, minimum values, standard deviation, and standard error) were calculated for replicated data. A box plot for ploidy groups was drawn for all characters using the R 3.5.3 version (R Core Team [46]) and R Studio Team [47]. The mean values were used for Spearman rank correlation, ploidy groups PCA, and ploidy-species annotated heatmap analysis with MVappa (https://mvapp.kaust.edu.sa; [48]) and ClustVis (https://biit.cs.ut.ee/clustvis, [49]) online tools, respectively.
Results
Intra and interspecific ploidy variation of Morus spp
The GS estimation of the core collections available in India is not yet investigated so far. Therefore, the estimation of the GS of the 157 potential germplasm encompasses different species of Morus that were collected from tropic, subtropical, and temperate areas all over the world, including functional hybrids, popular varieties cultivated in India, and are accounted for in this study (S1 Table). Results indicate that-
GS estimation signifying that the nDNA content of studied mulberry accessions ranged from 0.72 to 2.89pg, the highest amount of 2.89pgDNA was found in M. serrata (hexaploid genome) and the least value of 0.72pg was recorded in S-30 (diploid genome) (Fig 1A; S1 Table). The nDNA content in the replication of the same accession was almost the same (0.02 to 0.09; S1 Table).
The mean genome content of 0.86, 1.24, and 1.79pg was recorded for diploids, triploids, and tetraploids, respectively. The average GS ranges between 0.71 to 0.98pg for diploids, 1.16 to 1.29pg for triploids, 1.45 to 2.02pg for tetraploids, and 2.88 to 2.91pg for hexaploids are substantially different ploidy levels are differentiated as per the GS estimated (Fig 1A).
The mulberry accession in the same species varied slightly (Fig 1B). For example, 0.73pg and 0.98pg of GS were observed in SRDC-2 and Kokuso-20, which belongs to M. alba. Similarly, accessions of M. indica GS ranged between 0.72 to 0.98pg in diploids (S1 Table).
Among the predicted four ploidy, accessions of tetraploids showed the highest variability in GS, ranging from 1.45 to 2.02pg (±0.03) (Fig 1A).
Predicted ploidy level indicates wild collections of M. indica and M. alba, and M. macroura comprised all three types of ploidy as diploid, triploid, and tetraploid (Fig 1B). For example, accessions of M. indica MI-0173 (1.27±0.031pg), MI-0652 (1.26±0.024pg) and MI-0799 (1.24±0.021pg) are considered to be triploid, whereas MI-0454 (1.69±0.050pg) is tetraploid (S1 Table). In M. alba, accessions MI-0050 (1.16±0.015pg) and ME-0092 (1.21±0.018pg) are predicted to be triploid, whereas ME-0149 (1.45±0.024pg) is tetraploid. Accessions of M. macroura like MI-0051(1.21±0.018pg), MI-0079(1.23±0.015pg), MI-0521 (1.28±0.035pg) and MI-0772 (1.25±0.025pg) considered to be triploid and MI-0247(1.53±0.048pg), MI-0365(1.91±0.027pg), and MI-0387 (2.02±0.036pg) are tetraploid in nature (S1 Table).
The maximum variability at ploidy levels was observed from M. macroura, out of seventeen studied accessions, six are tested as higher ploidy levels (Fig 1B).
Additionally, FCM data indicates that with increasing ploidy levels, event count consistently decreased. The less event count might be the consequence of polyploidy-mediated increasing cell size with decreasing cell number (Fig 2A–2E).
Fig 1.
Patterns of genome size (GS) variation in mulberry accession A) Distribution of individual GS estimates and their relationship with ploidy, B) average distribution of GS belonging to diverse Morus spp.
Fig 2. Ploidy detection by flow cytometry and chromosomal counting.
Flow cytometry histograms of nuclei extracted from young leaf tissue of mulberry accessions comprising different ploidy groups and the corresponding chromosome numbers such as (A) diploid (2n = 2x = 28) (B) triploid (2n = 3x = 42), (C) tetraploid (2n = 4x = 56) and (D) hexaploid (2n = 6x = 84) with flow cytometry histograms depicting the relative fluorescence intensity obtained from the simultaneous analysis of isolated nuclei of mulberry leaves and the reference standard (Pisum sativum). Distinguishable predicted ploidy levels presented as histogram (E) and scattered plot (F). Average for the standards = 3.9% and for the sample = 2.9%.
Chromosome counting and validation of ploidy
The present cytological study validated and confirmed the chromosomal numbers of 12 selected mulberry accessions comprising different ploidy groups such as diploid varietiesV1, K2 (2n = 2x = 28, 415.65 Mbp, 419.08 Mbp), triploid Saranath-1 (2n = 3x = 42; 612.88 Mbp), tetraploid Lava forest-1 (2n = 4x = 56; 987.78Mbp) and hexaploid thick leaf M. serrata (2n = 6x = 84;1414.84Mbp) (Fig 2A–2E).
Genetic diversity parameters, polymorphism information content (PIC) and AMOVA
A set of 20 (32.25%) polymorphic SSRs out of 62 SSR primer pairs was expedited tomeasure the genetic diversity inferences among the 82 mulberry accessions selected based on collection site, open/cross-pollinated hybrid, and breeding information (lines including functional hybrid, culverts, polyploidy, and mutation breeding, etc.). These 20 informative markers generated 94 SSR alleles with an average of 4.7 alleles per SSR marker ranging from 2 (M2SSR112A) to 7 (MULSSR258, MULSSR85, and M2SSR20). A mean Shannon’s Information index (I) value of 1.137 was observed for all the markers varying from 0.383 to 1.914 (Table 1). The value of Ho for SSR markers ranging from 0.024 to 0.890 with a mean of 0.477 was observed, while the value of He varied from 0.208 to 0.853 with a mean of 0.606. The average PIC value for SSRs was 0.556. Fifteen (75%) SSR markers in total were found to be highly informative with a PIC value ≥0.50, Four (20%) were moderately informative with PICs values ≥0.25 and <0.50 and the remaining one was least informative with a PIC value <0.25. The values of PI varied from 0.152 to 0.794, with an average of 0.398. Whereas, PD varied from 0.206 to 0.848, with an average of 0.602 (Table 1).
Table 1. Characteristics of the 20 SSR loci among the 82 mulberry accessions.
S. No. | Locus name | Na | Ne | I | Ho | He | PIC | PI | PD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | M2SSR81 | 3 | 1.422 | 0.525 | 0.085 | 0.299 | 0.273 | 0.703 | 0.297 |
2 | Moso340-2 | 6 | 3.843 | 1.507 | 0.500 | 0.744 | 0.704 | 0.260 | 0.740 |
3 | M2SSR87 | 3 | 2.828 | 1.069 | 0.524 | 0.650 | 0.580 | 0.354 | 0.646 |
4 | Moso288 | 4 | 1.997 | 0.814 | 0.634 | 0.502 | 0.420 | 0.000 | 1.000 |
5 | MULSSR 253 | 4 | 2.912 | 1.137 | 0.695 | 0.661 | 0.592 | 0.343 | 0.657 |
6 | M2SSR112A | 2 | 1.490 | 0.510 | 0.390 | 0.331 | 0.285 | 0.671 | 0.329 |
7 | MULSSR26 | 4 | 3.003 | 1.196 | 0.634 | 0.671 | 0.605 | 0.333 | 0.667 |
8 | M2SSR68 | 3 | 1.701 | 0.739 | 0.366 | 0.415 | 0.373 | 0.588 | 0.412 |
9 | MULSSR313 | 5 | 3.242 | 1.303 | 0.598 | 0.696 | 0.650 | 0.501 | 0.499 |
10 | MULSSR258 | 7 | 4.018 | 1.565 | 0.890 | 0.756 | 0.714 | 0.249 | 0.751 |
11 | MoSo-157-2 | 6 | 3.335 | 1.331 | 0.293 | 0.704 | 0.652 | 0.300 | 0.700 |
12 | M2SSR36 | 5 | 2.561 | 1.101 | 0.159 | 0.613 | 0.549 | 0.391 | 0.609 |
13 | M2SSR1 | 5 | 3.114 | 1.263 | 0.134 | 0.683 | 0.627 | 0.321 | 0.679 |
14 | MULSSR85 | 7 | 6.583 | 1.914 | 0.768 | 0.853 | 0.831 | 0.152 | 0.848 |
15 | MULSSR96B | 5 | 3.630 | 1.440 | 0.695 | 0.729 | 0.689 | 0.275 | 0.725 |
16 | M2SSR10 | 4 | 2.630 | 1.090 | 0.753 | 0.624 | 0.544 | 0.380 | 0.620 |
17 | M2SSR89A | 5 | 2.465 | 1.107 | 0.390 | 0.598 | 0.532 | 0.406 | 0.594 |
18 | M2SSR107 | 3 | 1.260 | 0.383 | 0.024 | 0.208 | 0.198 | 0.794 | 0.206 |
19 | M2SSR82 | 6 | 4.071 | 1.521 | 0.325 | 0.759 | 0.719 | 0.246 | 0.754 |
20 | M2SSR20 | 7 | 2.596 | 1.226 | 0.675 | 0.619 | 0.577 | 0.385 | 0.615 |
4.7 | 2.935 | 1.137 | 0.477 | 0.606 | 0.556 | 0.383 | 0.617 |
Na = observed number of alleles, Ne = effective number of alleles, I = Shannon’s information index, Ho = observed heterozygosity, He = expected heterozygosity, PIC = polymorphism information content, PI: the probability of identity, PD: power of discrimination, PD is equal to 1 –PI.
The species-wise diversity analysis revealed that in four species a mean of 83.78% of loci were polymorphic. M. alba had maximum polymorphic loci (88.30%), while M. indica had at least one (80.85%). The maximum Na was observed in M. alba (1.777) with a mean of 1.686, while Ne (1.487) and I (0.425) were observed in Morus spp. with a mean of 1.462 and 0.413, respectively. The h (diversity) ranged from 0. 257 (M. indica) to 0.283 (Morus spp.) with an average of 0.273 whereas maximum uh (0.302) was recorded in Morus spp. with a mean of 0.288 (S5 Table).
To evaluate the overall partitioning of genetic diversity among studied germplasm collections, an AMOVA was executed using the genetic distance matrix. The AMOVA revealed that 94% of molecular variance was partitioned withinspecies and only 6% among species (S6 Table). The overall PhiPT was 0.058 (p-value = 0.001) suggesting a low level of genetic differentiation among studied Morusspecies. The pairwise population PhiPTand Nei’s genetic distance were analyzed to determine the genetic relationship among Morus species (S7 Table). The highest PhiPT (0.120) and Nei’s genetic distance (0.085) were observed between M. macroura and Morus spp. revealing that these species are more divergent. Whereas the lowest PhiPT (0.025) and Nei’s genetic distance (0.025) were observed between M. alba and M. indica, followed by M. alba and M. macroura with PhiPT (0.039) and Nei’s genetic distance (0.037). These results suggest that the pair of M. alba and M. indica and M. alba and M. macroura are genetically closer to each other as compared to other species (S7 Table).
Population genetic structure and cluster analysis
The SSR-basedclustering analysis of different Morus spp. was carried out using multidimensional Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA), Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Mean (UPGMA) based Neighbor-joining clustering, and Bayesian model-based complementary clustering approaches. The PCoA (Fig 3A) revealed that Morus species were grouped into three major genetic clusters with a high level of intermixing as complemented by UPGMA-based NJ clustering. The first three coordinates of PCoA only explained 25.68% of the total variation (PC1: 9.90%; PC2: 8.94% and PC3: 6.84%; Fig 3A).
Fig 3.
(A) Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) plot of 82 mulberry accessions using SSR markers. The PCoA revealed that 8 Morus species were grouped into three major genetic clusters with a high level of intermixing. The first three coordinates of PCoA explained the 25.68% of the total variation (PC1: 9.90%; PC2: 8.94% and PC3: 6.84%). (B) The donut chart represents the percentage of species used in the present analysis. (C) Phylogenetic analysis of 82 mulberry accessions from diverse geographical regions belonging to different species was grouped into three clusters. Different species were highlighted with different colour as described in Fig 5B.
The highest percentage of Morus species representation was from M. alba (33%), M. indica (28%), and M. macroura (20%) respectively (Fig 3B). The triploids (Suvarna-1, Suvarna-2, Suvarna-3 and Vishala (MI-0902) were grouped in Cluster III. These triploids were found very close to accession Vishwa, which is one of the parents used in breeding these triploids. Similarly, two accessions of ME-0018 and ME-0254 belonged to M. cathayana were grouped in Cluster III and exotic accessions ME-0113 and ME-0108 (Japan), ME-0178 (France), ME-0179 and Lun 40–2 (China) all belonged to M. alba and were groped in Cluster II-1 (Fig 3C).
Additionally, the UPGMA cluster analysis was used to describe the genetic relationships among the 82 Morus accessions (Fig 3C). According to the dendrogram analysis and dissimilarity coefficient measured using the Neighbor-joining method, it is depicted that the markers were successful in segregating among the mulberry accessions irrespective of species. The dendrogram grouped all accessions into three major genetic clusters-I, II, and III (See more detailed in S8 Table). Cluster I consists of 25 accessions and the majority of them were M. indica (13) and M. alba (9) conferring theirclose genetic relationships as depicted by pairwise population PhiPTand Nei’s genetic distance. ClusterII consists of 33 accessions and has two sub-clusters, Cluster II-1 and II-2 comprising 19 and 14 accessions respectively. Interestingly, sub-cluster II-1 comprises M. macroura (11) and M. alba (8) accessions conferring theirclose genetic relationships. Whereas, Cluster-III consists of 24 accessions of six mulberry species i.e. Morusspp. (7), M. alba (6), M. indica (5), M. macroura (3), M. cathayana (2), and M. serrata (1) and found to be the highest admixture cluster, since more accessions of which are mulberry varieties developed from two different species (Fig 3C). Further, other than cluster I, higher ploidy level accessions are distributed in the entire groups projecting that polymorphic SSRs detected in our study were not able to discriminate amongdiploids, triploids, and tetraploids.
The existence of population structure in Morus accessions was resolute using STRUCTURE analysis based on the determination of optimal K-value (Fig 4A–4C). The results indicated that Morus accessions were grouped into three clusters (Fig 4C). The cluster-I represents 35 accessions and the majority of them belong to M. indica (16) and M. alba (11), cluster-II represents 17 accessionsmajority of them belong to M. macroura (8) and M. alba (8), while clusterIII represents 17 accessions majority of them belongs toM. indica (7), Morus spp. (7) and M. alba (8). Further, based on membership coefficients (q ≥ 0.70) only 40 (48.78%) accessions were assigned toa specific population structure cluster belonging to pure ancestry. While the remaining 51.22% of accessions represented a high level of genetic admixtures in three clusters with membership coefficients of <0.70. Among species, two accessions of M. cathayana (100%), eight Morus spp. (72.73%), fourteen M. indica (60.87%), twelve M. alba (44.44%), and four M. macroura (25%) accessions represent pure ancestry.
Fig 4. Population structure of 82 mulberry accessions based on SSR markers.
A) Log probability of data, L (K) averaged over the replicates, B) Delta K values plotted as the number of subpopulations. (C) Subpopulations, K = 3 inferred using structure analysis.
Morphological traits variation and correlation
Variations in morphological characters among diploids, triploids, tetraploids, and hexaploids were examined and analysed (S9 Table). From this study, we observed that-
The internodal length (InD), leaf-lamina length (LLL), leaf area (LA), and mature inflorescence length (MIL) were greater in triploids compared to diploids and tetraploids (Fig 5, S10 Table).
Leaf-lamina width (LLW) and petiole width (PW) had higher mean values in tetraploids (17.8±6.62 cm and 0.36±0.1 cm) compared to diploids (13.5±3.57 cm, 0.27±0.09 cm) and triploids (15.9±2.4 cm, 0.32±0.07 cm).
Petiole length (PL) was greater in diploids (4.3±1.01 cm) compared to triploids (4.28±0.81 cm) and tetraploids (4.18±1.34 cm). Hence, PL was found to be decreased as the ploidy level increased.
Mature fruit length (MFL) was greater in triploids (3.85±0.77 cm) than in diploids (2.42±0.65 cm).
However, InD and MFW were significantly higher in triploids (7.83±1.15; 0.97±0.09) than in diploids (5.95±1.74 cm; 0.96±0.19 cm) and mature inflorescence length was significantly higher in triploids (4.05±1.02 cm) than in diploid (2.2±0.84 cm) and tetraploids (2.27±1.38 cm) as per the statistical analysis by Kruskal-Wallis H-test (S10 Table).
Fig 5. Box plot indicating variation of nine phenotypic traits, A- Inter-nodal distance (cm), B- Leaf-lamina length (cm), C- Leaf-lamina width (cm), D- Leaf area (sq.cm), E- Petiole length (cm), F- Petiole width (cm), G- Mature inflorescence length (cm), H- Mature fruit length (cm) I- Mature fruit width (cm) in the different ploidy levels detected in selected mulberry accessions.
Outliers are shown as circle.
The correlation results revealed a significant positive correlation of GS with traits viz., mature inflorescence length (MI, r = 0.45), and fruit length (FL, r = 0.38) (Fig 6A, 6B; S11 Table). However, it had recorded a non-significant association with internodal distance (InD, r = 0.19). It had a negative association with petiole length (PL, r = -0.04), leaf-lamina length (LLL, r = -0.08), and leaf area (LA, r = -0.02) which is also depicted in (S11 Table).
Fig 6.
(A) Correlation plots of nine morphological traits and genome size (B) Principal component analysis (PCA) indicates the contribution and relationship between 9 traits to phenotypic diversity and genome size (GS). Colour intensity was used for scaling (0–15 range). (C) Heatmap illustration of clustering relationship between morphological traits with ploidy and species annotation. Colour variation represents the level of trait variation across the species, ploidy as well as accession level. (D) PCA result indicates ploidy-grouping and distribution of studied accessions at the species level. The abbreviation denoted in brackets: leaf-lamina length (LLL), leaf-lamina width (LLW), leaf area (LA), petiole width (PW), inter-nodal distance (InD), petiole length (PL), mature fruit length (MFL), mature inflorescence length (MIL), genome size (GS) and mature fruit width (MFW).
Ploidy-species annotated phenotypic data was represented in hierarchical clustering with heat maps and principal component analysis (Fig 6C, 6D). Results indicate that 82 accessions were clustered into Cluster I and Cluster II, whereas, each cluster was divided into two sub-clusters (SCI and SCII). Primary groupings for entries were denoted by different colours (9 groups). Cluster I comprised one tetraploid, four triploids, and twenty-nine diploids. On the other hand, Cluster II have comprised of hexaploidy, one tetraploid, two triploids, and thirty-six diploids. Hence, out of six, four triploids were grouped in Cluster I (SCII) and higher MIL and MFL were observed in this cluster of genotypes. In general, the heat map demonstrated that Cluster I comprised triploids and comprised higher MIL and MFL than diploids. Although, the value of LLW, LLL, LA, PT, and PL were higher for the genotype belonging to diploids as compared to other ploidies. Additionally, PCA data (Fig 6C, 6D) indicates that the expansion of traits was restricted for diploids as compared to triploids. Data also suggests that few accessions of diploids have a higher value for specific traits. For example, accessions MI-0540 and MI-0673 were outgroup 95% confidence circles because of a higher value of inter-nodal distance (InD, 13.50 cm) and leaf area (LA, 451 cm2), respectively.
Discussion
Estimation of GS and intra-specific variation
Germplasm is an enduring resource management mission and asset for civilization and to fully explore the potential of germplasm material, particularly for the complex traits associated with yield in the face of the current threats of climate change, it is necessary to reconcile research advancement and innovation of practices [50]. There are several crop germplasm characterized in reference to ploidy level variation, and genetic and phenotypic diversity to explore the potential of germplasm material as well as elucidated consequences of polyploidization on functional traits [51–55]. Additionally, polyploidy (or whole genome duplication, WGD) has been recognized as a source of evolutionary force and its role in species diversification has been well understood [56]. Despite its importance, GS variation across the species and ploidy-level have not been considered ingermplasm material like tree plants mulberry, therefore itremains to be explored for a better understanding of fundamental aspects like (1) expansion of polyploidization/WGD occurred in mulberry; (2) preferred polyploid advantages present among the ploidy groups; (3) specific leaf/fruit traits associated with polyploid; and (4) how is population structure affected by polyploidization or WGD.
In the present section, we discuss the status of available polyploids of mulberry to understand polyploidy variation across the species level and try to address the first question. To address how and to what extent WGD occurred in mulberry, 157 mulberry accessions belonging to seven different species including popular varieties cultivated in India were selected and subjected to genome content analysis using FCM. GS data indicates that it ranged from 0.72 (M. indica, diploid) to 2.89 pg (M. serrata, hexaploid). Thus, the smallest GS: highest GS content ratio is about 4.01 (2.89/0.72) was observed within the studied population. Previous genome content studies revealed the 2C value of mulberry species ranged between 0.70 to 0.73 pg for diploid, 1.04 to 1.17 pg for triploid, 1.42 to 1.63 pg for tetraploid, and 2.02 to 2.48 pg for hexaploid, and 7.26 pg for decosaploid [11]. Thus, the present results corroborate with a previous study that a higher level of variation is present both at the species level as well as within the accessions of the same genus. However, the estimated GS of diploid M. alba differed from the previous study by Ohri and Kumar [57], it was around 1.7pg for the n = 14. Whereas, diploid M. alba was estimated to be 1.7 pg/2C measured by micro densitometry using Feulgen stained which might have some technical shortcomings [58, 59].
In our study the intraspecific variations of diploid GS data indices that about 34%, 37%, and 18% variation among the genotypes belonging to M. indica (59 genotypes), M. alba (55 genotypes) and M. macroura (17 genotypes), respectively. Moreover, GS variations in terms of the fold change are about 2.79, 1.98 and 2.43 among diploids belonging to M. indica, M. alba and M. macroura. Intraspecific variation has been recorded in Morus [59] and suggested the GS variation occurred by detection method, or by environmental factors, such as water stress, soil nutrition, or extreme climate condition, and with genetic factors, including duplications, or loss of some non-essential genes in an ongoing evolutionary process that increased or decreased the GS [60–63]. Recently, Xuan et al. [64], illustrated that chromosome fissions/fusions were the key mechanisms underlying the evolution of differences in the basic chromosome number between M. notabilis and M. alba.
Variation in terms of genotypes from other species like M. rotundiloba, M. cathayana, M. australis, M. serrata, M. sinensis is non-significant because of their representation in small numbers (1–2 genotypes). Hence, for diploids, more variation in genome content values was observed in M. indicaand M. alba. Meanwhile, M. macroura showed a high level of variation in tetraploids as previously observed by Yamanouchi et al. [11]. However, these estimates differ from previous FCM assessments, possibly because of differences in the DNA reference standard, dyeing time, and fluorochrome difference in the current study [65, 66]. Propidium iodide (PI) is commonly referred to for GS estimation through FCM as used in our present study [11, 65].
That GS variability does occur among the various genotypes at an intraspecific level due to the involvement of different genomes during hybridization and selection as well as naturally. Further GS variations are also observed among the genotypes collected from different ecological conditions. Mulberry is reported to be a higher adaptability tree plant with a huge variety of species and ploidy. The use of wild species in breeding provides a lot of possibilities, to incorporate the traits such as drought, frost, and disease resistance into cultivated varieties [67]. Breeding of mulberry takes about 12–16 years and to develop a variety, ploidy compatibility is an essential aspect of breeding. To date, the varieties (like V1, K2, S13, MSG2, etc.) released by the researchers are not sufficient for the future sericulture industry, and an urgent need to develop climate-resilient mulberry varieties, including diploids and triploids. Ploidy and GS can influence reproductive compatibility, fertility, and heritability of traits hence our data can be useful for understanding the breeding potential between the different species of mulberry. In this context, we have provided a new platform for future ploidy breeding by focusing on GS and diversity analysis of mulberry accessions available in India and their relationship.
Besides the FCM analysis, classical cytological work to estimate the metaphase chromosome number is essential to validate the chromosomal number, which is lacking in previous studies [10, 57, 59]. Attempts were made to count metaphase chromosome numbers using shoot-tips of original plants and present cytological evidence corroborates with previous studies [10, 13, 11–22, 68], which strengthening our FCM analysis.
Till 2020, chromosome configuration, genome size, meiotic association, and chromosome assembly at the genetic level were restricted in Morus. However, the controversy over the ploidy of M. alba was clarified by Jiao et al. [69] that the chromosome number (2n) of M. alba, is 28 (diploid) which provides a basis for a better understanding of the developmental and regulatory mechanism of economic target traits. Moreover, present GS estimation for diploids, triploids, tetraploids, and hexaploids, across the species level, was found to be technically foolproof to discriminate the higher ploidy level in the mulberry, because, among the different methods for GS estimating, FCM is now considered as the most precise method [70, 71]. GS varies significantly across plant life; however, variation of GS in vascular plants is associated with evolutionary consequences on plant development and ecological performance [63, 72]. Moreover, the present research generated GS of 157 core collections, in turn; the information can be useful for effective genetic improvement and genetic diversity investigations. Additionally, the present result and discussion clarify that Morus spp. having a higher level of GS variation, not restricted at the species level but also within the accessions of the same genus.
Genetic diversity based on SSR markers
Understanding of genetic diversity of mulberry is another important aspect of the future breeding program. Genomics-based breeding was reported to be an effective and promising approach to reaching sustainable crop improvement and is more relevant specifically for perennial crops such as mulberry [73]. Despite the significant progress achieved through conventional breeding, even though to date it is distressingly slow, mainly because of the perennial growth habit and complex inheritance pattern [73]. Additionally, the adoption of modern genomic approaches for crop improvement is severely constrained by the lack of sufficient molecular markers in mulberry [28]. Finally, the paucity of genomic information for co-dominant marker systems has been a serious obstacle to using molecular breeding for the advancement of mulberry genetics [29].
SSRs are simple tandemly repeated DNA sequences comprising units of 1 to 6 nucleotide(s) and are ubiquitous in plant genomes [74, 75]. Because of their distinct qualities of co-dominant inheritance, multi-allelic nature, vast genome coverage, high abundance, and especially good reproducibility, SSRs are the most widely recognized genetic markers that are actively used in plant breeding [76]. SSR markers are extensively employed in plant research for a wide range of studies including DNA fingerprinting, high-density mapping, genome comparative mapping, population diversity study, and assisted breeding [75]. Although the genetic distances, evolution, and kinship of Morus have been studied by using molecular marker technology, the conclusions are still controversial [77, 78]. In the present research, a set of stable and highly polymorphic SSR markers were employed as evidenced by greater PIC (0.556), PD (0.602), the observed heterozygosity (0.477), and a lower PI value of 0.398. Hence, markers’ inheritance clearly explains their potential as genetic resources in diversification studies. Moreover, the information generated in the present research based on SSR marker-based genotyping, higher PIC, PD, and observed heterozygosity can be efficiently used for future molecular breeding programs of the mulberry species/genotypes. Recently, Jain et al. [79], reported single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs) ranging from 241,897 (S1) to 657,137 (M. rotundiloba) in different mulberry accessions such as K2 reference genome with other accessions namely Punjab Local, M. indica, BR-8, M. multicaulis, and M. serrata showed higher genetic variations with ≥0.5 million SNPs which is conformity in our finding that phylogenetic analysis through SSRs revealed diverse relationship between selected species of Morus genome. SSR analysis of the mulberry germplasm confirmed a complicated genetic background and high genetic diversity. However, SSR markers were not able to differentiate among ploidy levels hence flow cytometry method is reliable for the determination of mulberry accession at the ploidy level. But, SSRs analysis is trustworthy for an understanding of the degree of genetic variation where the breeding of germplasm and mulberry germplasm conservation gets benefited. Moreover, the present research was focused to estimate genetic diversity using simple sequence repeats (SSRs), and coming to understand the phylogenetic relationship and population structure. Insight gained herein suggested the effect of genetic variation instead of ploidy, which might be the consequence of the high level of heterozygosity imposed by natural cross-pollination.
Additionally, population structure analyses are another important aspect of the present study because it reflects the relationship between GS and marker variation in the population structure analyses. The population structure analysis revealed the existence of three genetic clusters with a high level of intermixing, a high level of within-species genetic diversity, and a weak genetic structure among the studied Morus species. The combined clustering analysis revealed that only the majority of accessions of M. indica (CusterI) and M. macroura (ClusterII) were grouped in a specific cluster, while the accessions of M. alba, M. indica, and Morus spp. were distributed throughout the three major clusters suggesting a high level of genetic admixture in these species. Such results are attributed to the outbreeding and wind pollination reproductive system of Morus species [80]. In turn, the present finding suggests genetic background of species is the account of admixture between the groups that occurred due to a high level of heterozygosity as the result of gene exchange between the species during the outbreeding reproductive system. In addition, accessions were collected from different countries and they are continuously used for mulberry breeding programmes and which resulted in a mixed population. For example, M. alba species originating from France and Indonesia are grouped separately from those originating from Japan and India. Understanding the molecular diversity and modifications in genome content triggered by WGD, not only helps in determining the evolution but also shapes the plant genome leading to adaption, response to stress, and diversification [81]. In the era of high-throughput sequencing, the genomic resources in mulberry are enriched with the chromosome-level reference genome sequencing of M. alba and draft genome sequencing of M. indica [69, 79] will unravel the molecular composition and genome evolution [82].
Phenotypic trait plasticity and its relation to genome size (GS)
Polyploidy has been considered a source of evolutionary development, species expansion, as well as adaptation. Especially in plants, polyploids are most frequent events, which occurred as a consequence of WGD events and appear to be associated with environmental conditions. Hence, the present research tried to understand the phenotypic plasticity among the ploidy groups (2x, 3x, 4x, and 6x) in Morus spp. However, female floral features, notably style length, were a well-recognized attribute used to classify mulberries in terms of female accessions [83, 84]. Though, recently quantitative vegetative traits were considered and shown to be beneficial for mulberry plants [59]. Moreover, in the present research, we have considered both vegetative and reproductive traits to recognize the effect of WGD on phenotypic plasticity. The correlation results indicate a significant positive correlation between GS with traits viz., mature inflorescence length (MIL, 0.45), and Mature fruit length (MFL, 0.38). Similarly, Wang et al. [85] observed a weak significant positive correlation between GS and fruit size in Chinese jujube. Whereas, the relationship between DNA content and the inflorescence characters was non-significant [86]. Additionally, multiple trait-based PCA referred to GS linked with leaf area (LA), which is the account of the contribution of MIL, MFL, and InD (positive coordinate) and LLW, LLL, PT, and PL (X+, Y- coordinate). Though, further research will require investigating how and to what extent GS is intimate to physiological and/or anatomical traits in mulberry.
Conclusions
An intriguing area of mulberry (Morus spp.) research is to understand genetic complexity as their genetic makeup is complicated by cross-pollinate behavior with a huge number of ploidy variations across multiple wild species. In the present study, we have tried to highlight the intraspecific diversity of GS, phenotypic traits, and genetic variation of a worldwide collection of 157 mulberry accessions. Present investigation revealed that core collections bear a huge genome content variation, from diploid to hexaploids an about 4.01-fold difference of GS. Additionally, the phenotypic study suggests that a significant positive correlation between GS and mature fruit length (MFL) and mature inflorescence length (MIL). Furthermore, the population structure analysis revealed the presence of three genetic clusters with a high level of admixture, which implies the effect of genetic variation instead of ploidy on trait plasticity that could be a consequence of the high level of heterozygosity imposed by natural cross-pollination. Moreover, the information generated in the present study will complement further genetic diversity studies to identify unique/duplicate accessions, and GS/ploidy information as well as ploidy-associated traits will be useful for breeding and crop improvement. Besides mulberry breeding, the present study signifies downsize of traits with upscaling of GS, for example, petiole length (PL, diploids, 4.3±1.01 cm> triploids, 4.28±0.81 cm>tetraploids 4.18±1.34 cm). Therefore, future research to understand the consequences of polyploid mulberry need to be explored because biomechanical expenses of higher ploidy are more towards the maintenance of large cell size, large genome size, nucleic acid biosynthesis, and carrying out its physiological activities.
Supporting information
(PPTX)
(XLSX)
The reference column provides the source of the publication.
(XLSX)
(XLSX)
(XLSX)
(XLSX)
(XLSX)
PhiPT values below diagonal and Nei’s genetic distance above diagonal.
(XLSX)
(XLSX)
(XLSX)
(XLSX)
(XLSX)
Acknowledgments
Thanks to Karnataka State Sericulture Research and Development Institute (KSSRDI), Bangalore, Karnataka, India for providing the germplasm materials.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This research was funded by Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), New Delhi, grant number SERB SB/S2/RJN-049/2015.
References
- 1.Gnanesh BN, Tejaswi A, Arunakumar GS, Supriya M, Manojkumar HB, Tewary P. Molecular phylogeny, identification and pathogenicity of Rhizopus oryzae associated with root rot of mulberry in India. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2021;131(1):360–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Arunakumar GS, Gnanesh BN. Evaluation of artificial inoculation methods to determine resistance reaction to dry root rot and black root rot disease in mulberry (Morus spp.). Arch Phytopathol Plant Prot. 2023. 56(1), 49–65. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Clement WL, Weiblen GD. Morphological evolution in the mulberry family (Moraceae). Systematic Botany. 2009;34(3):530–52. [Google Scholar]
- 4.He N, Zhang C, Qi X, Zhao S, Tao Y, Yang G, et al. Draft genome sequence of the mulberry tree Morus notabilis. Nature communications. 2013;4(1):2445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gnanesh BN, Arunakumar GS, Tejaswi A, Supriya M, Manoj kumar HB, Devi SS. Characterization and pathogenicity of Lasiodiplodia theobromae causing black root rot and identification of novel sources of resistance in mulberry collections. The Plant Pathology Journal. 2022;38(4):272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zeng Q, Chen H, Zhang C, Han M, Li T, Qi X, et al. Definition of eight mulberry species in the genus Morus by internal transcribed spacer-based phylogeny. PloS one. 2015;10(8):e0135411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Otto SP. The evolutionary consequences of polyploidy. Cell. 2007;131(3):452–62. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.10.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wood TE, Takebayashi N, Barker MS, Mayrose I, Greenspoon PB, Rieseberg LH. The frequency of polyploid speciation in vascular plants. Proceedings of the national Academy of sciences. 2009;106(33):13875–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0811575106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Datta M. Cytogenetical studies on two species of Morus. Cytologia. 1954;19(1):86–95. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Basavaiah Dandin SB, Dhar A, and Sengupta K. Meiosis in natural decosaploid (22x) Morus nigra L. Cytologia. 1990; 55(3), 505–509. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yamanouchi H, Koyama A, Machii H. Nuclear DNA amounts of mulberries (Morus spp.) and related species. Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly: JARQ. 2017. Oct 1;51(4):299–307. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Das BC. Cytological studies on Morus indica L. and Morus laevigata Wall. Caryologia. 1961.14(1), 159–162. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Basavaiah Dandin SB, and Rajan MV. Microsporogenesis in hexaploid Morus serrata Roxb. Cytologia. 1989; 54(4), 747–751. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Seki H. Cytological studies of Moraceae plants (V) On the chromosome number of Morus tiliaefolia Makino. J. Fac. Text. Seric. Shinshu Univ. 1952;2:13–7. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dandin SB. Cross ability studies in mulberry. Indian J. Seric. 1987;26:11–4. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chakraborti SP, Vijayan K, Doss SG, Roy BN, Qadri SM. Varietal differences on karyomorphology of some popular cultivars in mulberry (Morus spp.). Sericologia. 1999;39:43–50. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Thumilan BM, Dandin SB. Genetic analysis of diploid and colchi-tetraploid mulberry (Morus indica and Morus alba) by molecular and morphological markers. International Journal of Plant Breeding. 2008;3(1):58–64. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Venkatesh KH, and Munirajappa. Cytogenetical studies in two tetraploid mulberry varieties (Moraceae). Chromosome Botany. 2013; 8(3), 63–67. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Venkatesh KH, Nijagunaiah R, and Munirajappa. Cytogenetical studies in some diploid mulberry varieties (Moraceae). Cytologia. 2013; 78(1): 69–72. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Venkatesh KH, Shivaswamy S, and Munirajappa. Cytomorphological studies of two mulberry varieties (Moraceae). Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2014;13(22), 2203–2207. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Venkatesh KH. Cytological studies in two diploid mulberry varieties (Moraceae). Chromosome Botany. 2014; 9(1), 35–38. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Venkatesh KH. Morpho-criteria and karyotype studies in three mulberry varieties. Chromosome Botany, 2015; 10(4), 145–149. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Shafiei D, and Basavaiah. Cytogenetic characterization of a triploid mulberry (Morus spp.) cultivar Suvarna-2. Ann. Plant Sci. 2018; 7(2156), 10–21746. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Awasthi AK, Nagaraja GM, Naik GV, Kanginakudru S, Thangavelu K, Nagaraju J. Genetic diversity and relationships in mulberry (genus Morus) as revealed by RAPD and ISSR marker assays. BMC genetics. 2004. Dec;5(1):1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Vijayan K, Gnanesh BN, Shabnam AA, Sangannavar PA, Sarkar T, Weiguo Z. Genomic Designing for Abiotic Stress Resistance in Mulberry (Morus spp.). In Genomic Designing for Abiotic Stress Resistant Technical Crops 2022. Nov 1 (157–244). Cham: Springer International Publishing. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Xiang ZH. A preliminary report on the application of RAPD in systematic of Morus L. Acta Sericol. Sin., 1995; 21, 203–207. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wei-Guo ZH, Xue-Xia MI, Bo ZA, Zhang L, Yi-Le PA, Huang YP. Construction of fingerprinting and genetic diversity of mulberry cultivars in China by ISSR markers. Acta Genetica Sinica. 2006. Sep 1;33(9):851–60. doi: 10.1016/S0379-4172(06)60119-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Mathi Thumilan B, Sajeevan RS, Biradar J, Madhuri T, N. Nataraja K, Sreeman SM. Development and characterization of genic SSR markers from Indian mulberry transcriptome and their transferability to related species of Moraceae. PloS one. 2016;11(9):e0162909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Pinto MV, Poornima HS, Sivaprasad V, Naik VG. A new set of mulberry-specific SSR markers for application in cultivar identification and DUS testing. Journal of Genetics. 2018;97:31–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zhang L, Zuo K, Zhang F, Cao Y, Wang J, Zhang Y, et al. Conservation of noncoding microsatellites in plants: implication for gene regulation. Bmc Genomics. 2006. Dec;7:1–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Arunakumar GS, Gnanesh BN, Manojkumar HB, Doss SG, Mogili T, Sivaprasad V, et al. Genetic diversity, identification, and utilization of novel genetic resources for resistance to Meloidogyne incognita in mulberry (Morus spp.). Plant Disease. 2021. Oct 29;105(10):2919–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Shinde BB, Manojkumar HB, Arunakumar GS, Bhavya MR, and Gnanesh BN. Assessment of statistical software to analyze genetic diversity in mulberry germplasm. Sericologia. 2021; 61 (3&4): 19–22. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Orhan E, Meleksen AK, Eyduran SP, Ercisli S. Molecular characterization of mulberry genotypes and species in Turkey. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca. 2020. Jun 30;48(2):549–57. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Krishnan RR, Naik VG, Ramesh SR, Qadri SM. Microsatellite marker analysis reveals the events of the introduction and spread of cultivated mulberry in the Indian subcontinent. Plant Genetic Resources. 2014;12(1):129–39. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Galbraith DW, Harkins KR, Maddox JM, Ayres NM, Sharma DP, Firoozabady E. Rapid flow cytometric analysis of the cell cycle in intact plant tissues. Science. 1983. Jun 3;220(4601):1049–51. doi: 10.1126/science.220.4601.1049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Doležel J, Bartoš J, Voglmayr H, and Greilhuber J. Nuclear DNA content and genome size of trout and human. Cytometry A 2003; 51: 127–128. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.10013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Anuradha HJ, Vijayan K, Nair CV, Manjula A. A novel and efficient protocol for the isolation of genomic DNA from mulberry (Morus L.). Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture. 2013:124–31. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Peakall RO, Smouse PE. GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular ecology notes. 2006;6(1):288–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Yeh FC, Yang RC, Boyle TB, Ye ZH, Mao JX. POPGENE, the user-friendly shareware for population genetic analysis. Molecular biology and biotechnology centre, University of Alberta, Canada. 1997;10:295–301. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC. Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Molecular ecology. 2007;16(5):1099–106. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03089.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Huang CJ, Chu FH, Huang YS, Tu YC, Hung YM, Tseng YH, et al. SSR individual identification system construction and population genetics analysis for Chamaecyparis formosensis. Scientific Reports. 2022;12(1):4126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 2000;155(2):945–59. doi: 10.1093/genetics/155.2.945 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Molecular ecology. 2005;14(8):2611–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Earl DA, VonHoldt BM. STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conservation genetics resources. 2012;4:359–61. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Perrier X, Jacquemoud-Collet JP. DARwin software. 2006. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Millard SP, EnvStats-An R. An R package for environmental statistics. New York: Springer‑Verlag; 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 47.RStudio T. RStudio: integrated development for R. Rstudio Team, PBC, Boston, MA: URL http://www.rstudio.com. 2020. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Julkowska MM, Saade S, Agarwal G, Gao G, Pailles Y, Morton M, et al. MVApp—multivariate analysis application for streamlined data analysis and curation. Plant Physiology. 2019;180(3):1261–76. doi: 10.1104/pp.19.00235 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Metsalu T, Vilo J. ClustVis: a web tool for visualizing clustering of multivariate data using Principal Component Analysis and heatmap. Nucleic acids research. 2015;43(W1):W566–70. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv468 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Mondal R, Kumar A, Gnanesh BN. Crop germplasm: Current challenges, physiological-molecular perspective, and advance strategies towards development of climate-resilient crops. Heliyon. 2023; e12973. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e12973 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Liang T, Sun W, Ren H, Ahmad I, Vu N, Huang J. Genetic diversity of Ziziphusmauritiana germplasm based on SSR markers and ploidy level estimation. Planta. 2019; 249:1875–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Zhang Y, Wang B, Qi S, Dong M, Wang Z, Li Y, et al. Ploidy and hybridity effects on leaf size, cell size and related genes expression in triploids, diploids and their parents in Populus. Planta. 2019;249:635–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Guo Q, Liu J, Li J, Cao S, Zhang Z, Zhang J, et al. Genetic diversity and core collection extraction of Robiniap seudoacacia L. germplasm resources based on phenotype, physiology, and genotyping markers. Industrial Crops and Products. 2022;178:114627. [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kumar S, Kaushik RA, Jain D, Saini VP, Babu SR, Choudhary R, et al. Genetic diversity among local mango (Mangiferaindica L.) germplasm using morphological, biochemical and chloroplast DNA barcodes analyses. Molecular Biology Reports. 2022; 49(5):3491–501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Samarina LS, Matskiv AO, Shkhalakhova RM, Koninskaya NG, Hanke MV, Flachowsky H, et al. Genetic diversity and genome size variability in the Russian genebank collection of tea plant [Camellia sinensis (L). O. Kuntze]. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2022; 12:800141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Van de Peer Y, Ashman TL, Soltis PS, Soltis DE. Polyploidy: an evolutionary and ecological force in stressful times. The Plant Cell. 2021; 33(1):11–26. doi: 10.1093/plcell/koaa015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Ohri D, Kumar A. Nuclear DNA amounts in some tropical hardwoods. Caryologia. 1986; 39(3–4):303–7. [Google Scholar]
- 58.Greilhuber J. Intraspecific variation in genome size: a critical reassessment. Annals of Botany. 1998; 82:27–35. [Google Scholar]
- 59.Chang LY, Li KT, Yang WJ, Chung MC, Chang JC, Chang MW. Ploidy level and their relationship with vegetative traits of mulberry (Morus spp.) species in Taiwan. Scientia Horticulturae. 2018;235:78–85. [Google Scholar]
- 60.Rayburn AL, Price HJ, Smith JD, Gold JR. C‐band heterochromatin and DNA content in Zea mays. American Journal of Botany. 1985; 72(10):1610–7. [Google Scholar]
- 61.Laurie DA, Bennett MD. Nuclear DNA content in the genera Zea and Sorghum. Intergeneric, interspecific and intraspecific variation. Heredity. 1985; 55(3):307–13. [Google Scholar]
- 62.Bennett MD, Leitch IJ. Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms. Annals of botany. 1995; 76(2):113–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Greilhuber J, Leitch IJ. Genome size and the phenotype. In Plant genome diversity volume 2: physical structure, behaviour and evolution of plant genomes 2012; 323–344. Vienna: Springer Vienna. [Google Scholar]
- 64.Xuan Y, Ma B, Li D, Tian Y, Zeng Q, He N. Chromosome restructuring and number change during the evolution of Morus notabilis and Morus alba. Horticulture Research. 2022;9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Doležel J, Sgorbati S, Lucretti S. Comparison of three DNA fluorochromes for flow cytometric estimation of nuclear DNA content in plants. Physiologia plantarum. 1992;85(4):625–31. [Google Scholar]
- 66.Guo LT, Wang SL, Wu QJ, Zhou XG, Xie W, Zhang YJ. Flow cytometry and K-mer analysis estimates of the genome sizes of Bemisia tabaci B and Q (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Frontiers in physiology. 2015;6:144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Tikader A, Kamble CK. Mulberry wild species in India and their use in crop improvement a review. Aust J Crop Sci. 2008;2(2):64–72. [Google Scholar]
- 68.Kumara RR, Ramesh HL, Manjunatha HB. Morpho-biometric and cytogenetic analysis of clonally evolved mulberry cultivars (Morus Spp.). Acta. Sci. Agric. 2021;5:92–101. [Google Scholar]
- 69.Jiao F, Luo R, Dai X, Liu H, Yu G, Han S, et al. Chromosome-level reference genome and population genomic analysis provide insights into the evolution and improvement of domesticated mulberry (Morus alba). Molecular plant. 2020;13(7):1001–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Pellicer J, Leitch IJ. The application of flow cytometry for estimating genome size and ploidy level in plants. Molecular plant taxonomy: methods and protocols. 2014:279–307. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-767-9_14 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Bourge M, Brown SC, Siljak-Yakovlev S. Flow cytometry as tool in plant sciences, with emphasis on genome size and ploidy level assessment. Genetics & Applications. 2018;2(2):1–2. [Google Scholar]
- 72.Veselý P, Bureš P, Šmarda P, Pavlíček T. Genome size and DNA base composition of geophytes: the mirror of phenology and ecology?. Annals of Botany. 2012;109(1):65–75. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcr267 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Mathithumilan B, Kadam NN, Biradar J, Reddy SH, Ankaiah M, Narayanan MJ, et al. Development and characterization of microsatellite markers for Morus spp. and assessment of their transferability to other closely related species. BMC Plant Biology. 2013;13(1):1–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Tautz D, Renz M. Simple sequences are ubiquitous repetitive components of eukaryotic genomes. Nucleic acids research. 1984;12(10):4127–38. doi: 10.1093/nar/12.10.4127 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Zhong Y, Cheng Y, Ruan M, Ye Q, Wang R, Yao Z, et al. High-throughput SSR marker development and the analysis of genetic diversity in Capsicum frutescens. Horticulturae. 2021;7(7):187. [Google Scholar]
- 76.Wayne P, Gordon CM, Jim P. Polymorphism revealed by simple sequence repeats. Trends in Plant Science. 1996;1(7):215–22. [Google Scholar]
- 77.Zhao W. Studies on Genetic Diversity and Molecular Phylogeny of Germplasm Resources of Genus Morus. Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. Zhengjiang, China. Doctor thesis, In Chinese.2005. [Google Scholar]
- 78.Muhonja L, Yamanouchi H, Yang CC, Kuwazaki S, Yokoi K, Kameda T, et al. Genome-wide SNP marker discovery and phylogenetic analysis of mulberry varieties using double-digest restriction site-associated DNA sequencing. Gene. 2020;726:144162. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2019.144162 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Jain M, Bansal J, Rajkumar MS, Sharma N, Khurana JP, Khurana P. Draft genome sequence of Indian mulberry (Morus indica) provides a resource for functional and translational genomics. Genomics. 2022;114(3):110346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Bajpai PK, Warghat AR, Sharma RK, Yadav A, Thakur AK, Srivastava RB, et al. Structure and genetic diversity of natural populations of Morus alba in the Trans-Himalayan Ladakh Region. Biochemical genetics. 2014;52:137–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Soltis PS, Soltis DE. Plant genomes: Markers of evolutionary history and drivers of evolutionary change. Plants, People, Planet. 2021;3(1):74–82. [Google Scholar]
- 82.Pellicer J, Hidalgo O, Dodsworth S, Leitch IJ. Genome size diversity and its impact on the evolution of land plants. Genes. 2018;9(2):88. doi: 10.3390/genes9020088 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Minamizawa K. Moriculture: Basic and Application. Houmeishia Publishing, Tokyo, Japan. 1976;127–266. [Google Scholar]
- 84.Chang JC. Taxonomy and cultivar improvement of mulberry in Taiwan. J. Taiwan Soc. Hort. Sci. 2006;52(4):377–92. [Google Scholar]
- 85.Wang L, Luo Z, Liu Z, Zhao J, Deng W, Wei H, et al. Genome size variation within species of Chinese jujube (Ziziphus jujuba Mill.) and its wild ancestor sour jujube (Z. acidojujuba Cheng et Liu). Forests. 2019;10(5):460. [Google Scholar]
- 86.Lysak MA, Dolezel J. Estimation of nuclear DNA content in Sesleria (Poaceae). Caryologia. 1998;51(2):123–32. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
(PPTX)
(XLSX)
The reference column provides the source of the publication.
(XLSX)
(XLSX)
(XLSX)
(XLSX)
(XLSX)
PhiPT values below diagonal and Nei’s genetic distance above diagonal.
(XLSX)
(XLSX)
(XLSX)
(XLSX)
(XLSX)
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.