Abstract
Background and Aim:
Dogs and cats are popular pets that play integral roles in human societies worldwide. Unfortunately, they can carry potential zoonotic helminths that can be transmitted to humans. However, data on the gastrointestinal helminths affecting dogs and cats in Bogor, Indonesia, are currently lacking. This study aimed to investigate the occurrence of gastrointestinal helminth parasites in pets from this area using a retrospective analysis.
Materials and Methods:
A retrospective study was conducted at the Veterinary Teaching Hospital of IPB University, Bogor. Cat and dog patients from January 2014 to April 2019 were tested for helminth infections and the results as well as their age, sex, and breed data were analyzed using the Chi-square test.
Results:
Among the dogs and cats examined for internal parasites, 61.11% (33/51) of the dogs and 53.80% (92/171) of the cats were infected by helminths. Among the dogs, hookworm (37.04%) and Toxocara spp. (24.07%) were detected, while in the cats, hookworm (11.11%), Toxocara spp. (38.01%), and Dipylidium caninum (4.68%) were detected. The prevalence of hookworm and D. caninum was higher in older pets, while Toxocara spp. infected younger cats and dogs (<1 year) more frequently. The prevalence of Toxocara spp. in the Indonesian local dog breed was higher when than other breeds. Sex did not significantly affect the prevalence of parasites in dogs or cats.
Conclusion:
The discovery of zoonotic helminth parasites in the cat and dog pets from Bogor raises concerns for the inhabitants. Initiatives will be required to inform pet owners about prevention strategies for these parasitic diseases.
Keywords: Bogor, cat, dog, gastrointestinal helminth, zoonosis
Introduction
Pet ownership in Indonesia, in cities in particular, has increased over the last decade. A survey has also shown that the rates of cat ownership (37%) have now surpassed dog ownership (16%) [1]. Pet ownership has several acknowledged benefits, such as reducing stress, inducing sympathetic responses, and improving lipid profiles. This is evidenced as cat and dog owners report receiving love, companionship, affection, and company from their pets [2]. Pet owners feel emotionally happy as their pets help them to cope with stress and loneliness [3]. The increase in pet ownership can also be related to using pet animals in cultural services, such as dogs that are used for helping blind people to walk and pets used for pest control [4]. The increase in pet ownership is also related to cultural changes; the development of technical facilities such as pet harnesses and portable cages; and increased online purchasing availability. Furthermore, many shopping centers and outdoor areas in Indonesian cities are now pet friendly. Many pet owners, especially dog and cat owners, reportedly view their pets as family members and companions [5]. Pets also provide companionship when exercising, such as walking, running, playing, or working in a park [6].
Despite the benefits of pet ownership, there are also health hazards to consider, as pets can carry zoonotic diseases that can naturally transmit between vertebrate animals and humans. Zoonotic diseases can be transmitted from animals to humans, and vice versa, from humans to animals [7–10]. Animals can carry parasites, including helminths [11–13], that can be transferred to humans through contaminated food [14–16] or contact with contaminated environments [17–19]. Many intestinal parasites in dogs and cats can infect humans if they come into contact with them directly or if people are exposed to areas polluted by their feces [12, 20–30]. Some of the specific parasites that can infect humans include Toxocara spp., Toxascaris [31, 32], hookworms [33, 34], Dipylidium caninum [35–37], and Strongyloides spp. [38, 39]. For example, infection from the common roundworms found in dogs and cats, that is, Toxocara canis and Toxocara cati, can occur through the unintentional consumption of infective eggs and result in visceral and ocular larva migrans syndromes in people [40–42]. The hookworms that infect dogs and cats, mainly Ancylostoma spp. can also infect humans with different mechanisms of infection compared to Toxocara spp. infections. Ancylostoma spp. eggs expelled from cat and dog feces will develop into infective larvae (stadium III) in the environment. Humans can get the infection by hookworms when the infective larvae of Ancylostoma spp. from the environments actively penetrate human skin causing human cutaneous larva migrans [43, 44]. Furthermore, humans can be accidental hosts for D. caninum if they ingest infected fleas during the cysticercoid stage of pathogen development [37, 45]. In general, some human parasitic infections occur asymptomatically in humans, but others can cause serious illness and even death [37, 46, 47].
Efforts to prevent human disease include the appropriate treatment of pets [12, 28] and public education about the zoonoses of parasites [16]. In particular, the Veterinary Teaching Hospital in Indonesia plays a key role in preventing zoonotic parasite transmission, as they treat animals and provide public education, particularly for pet owners. To educate owners and veterinary professionals about helminth parasite prevention, up-to-date knowledge on gastrointestinal helminth parasites in pets is crucial.
This investigation conducted a retrospective analysis of the laboratory examinations for helminth infections in cat and dog patients with a parasite infection at the Veterinary Teaching Hospital of IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia.
Materials and Methods
Ethical approval
The research procedures have been approved by the animal care and use committee of the Veterinary Teaching Hospital of IPB University with ethical approval number 20–2016. The manuscript contained a study based on secondary data; therefore, no animal was used as an experimental animal in the trial. The fecal samples as the object for examination were collected by well-trained professionals (veterinarians or veterinary paramedics) concerning animal welfare regulations.
Study period and location
The study was conducted to collect and analyze the available data of Helminthology Laboratory test results from January 2014 to April 2019. The data were obtained from patients’ medical records at the Veterinary Teaching Hospital of IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia.
Data collection
A retrospective study design was used in this investigation. Helminth infections of dogs and cats were obtained from the patients’ medical records.
The Veterinary Teaching Hospital of IPB University receives patients to assess suspected helminth parasite infections (patients that have signs of cachexia, abnormal consistencies and color of feces, watery or bloody diarrhea, abdominal pain, and vomit worms), and for general check-ups, which include fecal examinations for parasites. Fecal samples were collected from the rectum using a spatula. A direct fecal examination was used to detect parasitic infection. This study used a wet mount fecal test to detect parasitic eggs. A small amount of the feces was placed on a microscope slide, a drop of aquadest was added, and it was then covered with a cover glass. The entire fecal smear was systematically examined for helminth parasite ova under a light microscope (Olympus BX51, Olympus Corporation, Japan) with 100×, 200×, and 400× magnification.
Statistical analysis
The data obtained were analyzed using descriptive analysis to determine the prevalence of each helminthiasis in the dog and cat samples. The pet species, age, sex, breed, and helminth parasite infection status data were then analyzed using the Chi-square test to identify the risk variables for helminth parasite infections in pets.
Results
In total, 54 dogs and 171 cats were examined for intestinal parasites. Of these, 61.11% of dogs and 53.80% of cats were positive for gastrointestinal helminthic infections (Table-1). The gastrointestinal helminths recorded in the dogs and cats in this study were ascarid (Toxocara spp.), hookworms, and D. caninum. Dogs were positive for Toxocara spp. (24.07%) and hookworms (37.04%) (Table-1), while cats were positive for Toxocara spp. (38.01%), hookworms (11.11%), and D. caninum (4.68%) (Table-1).
Table-1.
Prevalence (%) of parasitic eggs in dog and cat faeces in the Veterinary Teaching Hospital of the School of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia.
| Animal species | Number of examined animals | Hookworm positive (%) | Toxocara spp. positive (%) | Dipylidium caninum positive (%) | All helminths positive (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dog | 54 | 20 (37.04) | 13 (24.07) | 0 (0.00) | 33 (61.11) |
| Cat | 171 | 19 (11.11) | 65 (38.01) | 8 (4.68) | 92 (53.80) |
| Total | 225 | 39 (17.33) | 78 (34.67) | 8 (3.56) | 125 (55.56) |
Age was found to influence the prevalence of hookworms in the dogs and cats (Tables-2 and 3). Older dogs and cats (>1 year) had a more significant risk of hookworm infection than younger ones (p < 0.05). Ascarids were detected more frequently in dogs and cats that were <1 year of age (p < 0.05). Furthermore, ascarid infections were also found to be influenced by breed (Table-2), while the prevalence of D. caninum was associated with cat age (p < 0.05) (Table-3). Sex did not significantly affect helminth parasite prevalence in the dogs or cats (Tables-2 and 3).
Table-2.
Prevalence of helminthic infections in pet dogs based on different risk factors.
| Risk factors | Categories | Number of examined animals | Number of infected animals | Prevalence (%) | Chi-square | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hookworms | ||||||
| Sex | Male | 25 | 11 | 44.0 | 0.968 | 0.325 |
| Female | 29 | 9 | 31.0 | |||
| Age | Young (≤1 year) | 25 | 4 | 16.0 | 8.835 | 0.003* |
| Adults (>1 year) | 29 | 16 | 55.2 | |||
| Breed | Pure breed | 35 | 15 | 42.9 | 2.576 | 0.276 |
| Local | 8 | 1 | 12.5 | |||
| Mix breed | 11 | 4 | 36.4 | |||
| Toxocara spp. | ||||||
| Sex | Male | 25 | 5 | 20.0 | 0.423 | 0.516 |
| Female | 29 | 8 | 27.6 | |||
| Age | Young (≤1 year) | 25 | 13 | 52.0 | 19.861 | 0.000* |
| Adults (>1 year) | 29 | 0 | 0.0 | |||
| Breed | Pure breed | 35 | 4 | 11.4 | 10.433 | 0.005* |
| Local | 8 | 5 | 62.5 | |||
| Mix breed | 11 | 4 | 36.4 | |||
Significant at p < 0.05
Table-3.
Prevalence of helminthic infections in pet cats based on different risk factors.
| Risk factors | Categories | Number of examined animals | Number of infected animals | Prevalence (%) | Chi-square | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hookworms | ||||||
| Sex | Male | 81 | 8 | 9.9 | 0.238 | 0.626 |
| Female | 90 | 11 | 12.2 | |||
| Age | Young (≤1 year) | 120 | 7 | 5.8 | 11.348 | 0.001* |
| Adults (>1 year) | 51 | 12 | 23.5 | |||
| Breed | Pure breed | 65 | 9 | 13.8 | 0.795 | 0.672 |
| Local | 64 | 6 | 9.4 | |||
| Mix breed | 42 | 4 | 9.5 | |||
| Toxocara spp. | ||||||
| Sex | Male | 81 | 30 | 37.0 | 0.062 | 0.803 |
| Female | 90 | 35 | 38.9 | |||
| Age | Young (≤1 year) | 120 | 59 | 49.2 | 21.248 | 0.000* |
| Adults (>1 year) | 51 | 6 | 11.8 | |||
| Breed | Pure breed | 65 | 20 | 30.8 | 2.339 | 0.311 |
| Local | 64 | 27 | 42.2 | |||
| Mix breed | 42 | 18 | 42.9 | |||
| Dipylidium caninum | ||||||
| Sex | Male | 81 | 2 | 2.5 | 1.684 | 0.194 |
| Female | 90 | 6 | 6.7 | |||
| Age | Young (≤1 year) | 120 | 0 | 0.0 | 19.747 | 0.000* |
| Adults (>1 year) | 51 | 8 | 15.7 | |||
| Breed | Pure breed | 65 | 6 | 9.2 | 4.911 | 0.086 |
| Local | 64 | 1 | 1.6 | |||
| Mix breed | 42 | 1 | 2.4 | |||
Significant at p < 0.05
Discussion
This study examined helminth cases recorded from January 2014 to April 2019 at the Veterinary Teaching Hospital of the School of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, IPB University. The overall prevalence of helminthic infections in dogs and cats was 61.11% and 53.80%, respectively. The prevalence was high compared to other parts of Indonesia (15.09%–57.14%) [48–50] or other countries, such as Ghana (52.6%) [51] and Thailand (40.1%) [52]. Lower prevalence levels have also been reported in cats in other studies from Indonesia (1.7%–37.8%) [53–55] and Thailand (33.9%) [52]. The prevalence results for dogs and cats in this study were lower than the results recorded for Klang Valley, Malaysia, which were 87.7% and 57.9%, respectively [56]. The differences in prevalence may be because the previous studies focused on stray dogs and cats, which have an increased risk for helminth infection compared to pets. In general, helminthiasis in dogs and cats may be related to management issues, such as being reared to be free-roaming, low hygiene and environmental conditions in their house, irregular deworming, lack of vector control, and low awareness in carrying animals [57].
The most frequently encountered parasites in this study in dogs and cats were hookworms and ascarids (Toxocara spp.). These results were in agreement with those for cats in Surabaya [53], Belgrade (Serbia) [58] and dogs and cats from metropolitan and micropolitan areas in Northern Italy and the Selangor and Pahang states of Malaysia [59, 60]. The distribution of the two types of parasites is a cosmopolitan [33, 34, 53, 56, 61–64], and generally, such parasites have a simple life cycle, direct transmission through contact or ingestion of infective larvae or eggs, and the presence of vectors [11, 61, 65, 66].
In this study, hookworm cases in cats (11.11%) were lower than those in dogs (37.04%). This result is similar to a previous study in cats and dogs (15.26% and 20.23%, respectively) in Guangdong, China [8]. Dogs may have higher infection rates than cats due to their rearing system and behavior. Dogs are generally tied up, kept outside the house, and more active than cats. Cat hookworm cases in this study were lower than those previously reported in Bali (37.59%) [67] but higher than those in Banyuwangi (3.96%) [68]. The prevalence of hookworms in dogs in this study is consistent with reported in Bali (34%) [69] and Cebu, in the Philippines (38%) [70]. A high prevalence of hookworm infection was previously found in dogs originating from Java Island (88.64%–92.5%) [71]. However, as the dogs in the previous study were local pups that were raised as roaming dogs, this may have affected the data. For example, the feeding behavior of stray dogs outside of the house increases their risk for hookworm infection [8]. Hookworm distribution worldwide among dogs and cats ranges from 15.26% to 95.8% [8, 52, 56]. In addition, another study by De et al. [72] reported a hookworm prevalence of 13.20% in dogs in Ludhiana, India. Different geographic areas and seasonal conditions may thus influence the variability in the prevalence of hookworm infections. For instance, India has four seasons, and the highest levels of hookworm prevalence occur in the autumn period, with a temperature range of 23°C–30°C; this creates favorable conditions for the pre-parasitic stage of development.
In this investigation, the prevalence of toxocariasis in cats (38.01%) was found to be lower when compared with the previous reports in other regions of Indonesia (43.65%–71.43%) [67, 68], but higher than other Indonesian regions [73–75]. The differences in prevalence may be related to rearing management, as high prevalence levels for toxocariasis were observed in Banyuwangi and Bali in stray cats. Globally, the prevalence of Toxocara worldwide is highest in strays compared to pets or working dogs, such as hunting dogs [76, 77]. Toxocara eggs can contaminate an environment and survive for long periods in feces, which increases the communication risk for other susceptible animals [61, 68]. Contamination with infective Toxocara eggs can also occur in the hairs of cats and dogs [40, 78–80] and children’s playgrounds worldwide [81–83]. This may be related to parasite biology, as female Toxocara worms can produce 200,000 eggs daily. These eggs become infectious within 1 month after being expelled in the feces [84]. Furthermore, particularly in dogs, there is the possibility of prevalence overestimation for toxocariasis due to their coprophagy behavior (consumption of their own feces). Dogs can thus act as transport hosts for all helminth eggs; this behavior can influence the results of the helminthic egg detection tests [85, 86].
This study reports that the prevalence rate D. caninum, which is 4.68% for cats, is lower than the reported rate for stray cats in Semarang (6.6%) [87] but higher than the reported rate in Vladivostok, Russia (2.2%) [88]. Further, the D. caninum infection rate is higher in older cats than in younger ones. Cats can be infected when ingesting fleas (Ctenocephalides felis) containing D. caninum larvae [89]. The risk of D. caninum infection increases in animals parasitized with lice or fleas [37, 90] as the intermediate hosts of D. caninum are dog and cat fleas (Ctenocephalides canis and C. felis, respectively) and cat and dog chewing lice (Felicola subrostratus and Trichodectes canis, respectively), while the final hosts are the dogs and cats. Infection in humans occurs when they accidentally ingest fleas infected with D. caninum cysticercoid [35, 91]. The low prevalence of D. caninum in cats in this study can be attributed to modern housing arrangements and enhanced environmental hygiene awareness in most homes, making it difficult for intermediate hosts to survive. Thus, the transmission cycle breaks the confined endemic focus of infection. In addition to using anthelmintics in infected cats and dogs, an important control method of D. caninum infection in cats and dogs involves the elimination of ectoparasites that are intermediate hosts [92–94].
Principally, hookworms can infect animals of all ages [95]. However, this study, has reported a higher prevalence of hookworm in older animals than in younger ones. Similarly, another study by Johnson et al. [96] reported a higher prevalence rate of hookworm infection (90.4%) in adult dogs (>12 months old) in Ghana when compared with young adult dogs (6–12 months old) (72.8%) and puppies (<6 months old) (40.7%). However, other studies have also reported contrasting results [7, 97, 98]. The differences in prevalence between different ages in different studies may depend on the parasitic intensity of infection and the locations of the sampled animals [99]. The differing results may also be related to the dog management strategy. The previous study has reported that most dogs are raised as free-roaming, hunting dogs raised outdoors. Hunting dog owners in Sukabumi usually go hunting with their dogs twice a week, and infection might occur during these events [100].
During the life cycle of Ancylostoma caninum, a hookworm infection can occur during the latent stage, larval hypobiosis, fecal–oral transmission, and mammary–oral infection [101]. Hookworm infection can occur when A. caninum infective larvae invade through the skin’s sweat glands, hair follicles, or through direct ingestion [70]. In addition, puppies can be infected through their mother through transplacental and trans mammary routes [78]. The larvae of A. caninum, as the causative agent of hookworm infection, can be reactivated during the animal host gestational period. These larvae can cause autoinfections of the dam and cause patent hookworm infections in adult animals [95], and in the offspring. Severe hookworm infection can cause anemia and death due to the resulting blood loss [10].
The prevalence of toxocariasis was higher in younger dogs and cats than in older ones. This is in line with the previous research [68], which has reported a higher disease prevalence in cats under 6 months, and a meta-analysis that showed a higher prevalence of toxocariasis in cats under 12 months when compared to cats aged >12 months [79]. This may be due to the transmammary transmission route in young animals [61]. Due to the transplacental infection of the fetus and the established evidence of age-associated immunity in adult dogs, as previously reported, it was hypothesized that the prevalence of Toxocara was more significant in young puppies. Older dogs may have established specific immunity to Toxocara due to frequent exposure at a young age [51]. Higher toxocariasis prevalence in young animals may be due to the immunity status, drug resistance, lack of anthelmintic therapy, and lack of owner awareness regarding parasitic infections [57].
In this study, there was a higher prevalence of Toxocara in dogs from local breeds; this may be because they are generally free-roaming, which frequently exposes them to contaminated environments [80]. Toxocara infections can be transmitted through the soil; and habits like feeding off floors and sleeping without a mat enable transmission through this route [51]. Studies have also reported the existence of non-embryonated and embryonated Toxocara eggs on dog hair [78, 80]. The community generally raises local dogs in low and middle economic incomes; consequently, their awareness of dog health conditions, including hygiene, nutrition, and deworming programs, is low [72].
The prevalence of gastrointestinal helminth parasites in cats and dogs does not show a significant difference between males and females. Differences in the susceptibility to parasitic worm infections based on sex remain controversial. A meta-analysis study reported a similar prevalence of toxocariasis in female and male cats [79]. Some studies have reported a higher prevalence of toxocariasis in female cats and dogs when compared with males [75, 98]. However, a meta-analysis of Toxocara infection in dogs showed contrasting results [76]. During pregnancy, female animals often experience stress and spend much more time with their offspring, which may exacerbate re-infestation. This condition may be related to the high infection rates in young pets that may cause reinfection in older female animals [98]. In contrast, another study reported a higher prevalence in male cats than in females [73]. The risk of male cats being infected with Toxocara is 1.5 times that of female cats [73], as male cats are more likely to leave the house than females, particularly during the mating season. This behavior means that male cats will have an increased risk of exposure to Toxocara.
The helminth parasites found in this study, namely Toxocara spp., hookworms, and D. caninum in cats; and Toxocara spp. and hookworms in dogs, are all zoonotic and may be a public health concern. Pet cats and dogs can have high carrier rates for ascarid and hookworms and they can thus contaminate the environments with infective eggs and larvae. The presence of infective helminthic eggs and larvae in the environment could be a source of infection for humans, specifically children [53]. In addition, these eggs can persist as pathogens in the environment for years [95]. Thus, administering anthelmintics to kittens and puppies at <1 month is crucial to reducing helminth contamination. This phenomenon occurs because female worms can become pregnant and lay eggs as early as 3 weeks after the kittens and puppies are born. This information is essential for practicing veterinarians on the front lines to help prevent the spread of parasites via pets. They can have direct contact with the potential risk factors for their pet patients and may communicate directly with the pet owners. Practicing veterinarians must be aware of these illnesses and their zoonotic potential, and treat helminth infections in pets and instruct owners on how to reduce the risk of zoonotic transmission.
Conclusion
The results of this investigation have shown that helminth infections are widespread in dogs and cats from Bogor, Indonesia. The most common nematodes in both species were Toxocara spp., hookworms, and cestodes. Dipylidium caninum has been found to have zoonotic potential, and the discovery of zoonotic helminth parasites in local pets is a cause for concern for the inhabitants of Bogor. As a result, initiatives will be required to teach pet owners how to prevent these parasitic diseases, particularly in younger pet animals with significantly higher prevalence rates.
This investigation had some limitations. The first is that a traditional method for detecting parasitic infection (wet mount fecal smear) was used with a low accuracy level. In addition, The prevalence of infection in this study could be underestimated because the examination of the sample was carried out only once. Furthermore, not all pets that come to the hospital are examined for helminth parasite infection and thus, the prevalence may be underestimated. The samples were only examined for suspected parasite infections, which may not reflect the true prevalence in the Bogor area. Future investigations should thus improve on the study design and use improved parasitology diagnostics to determine the true parasitic infection rates in pet cats and dogs. To improve the research design, future studies should consider the detection of parasitic infections on all patients who come to the Veterinary Teaching Hospital, not only those with clinical signs or full medical check-ups, or epidemiological studies that can be designed to detect parasitic infections from samples representing the population of pet cats and dogs in Bogor. In addition, to improve the detection methods, future studies should also consider using more accurate diagnostic tools, such as flotation, sedimentation, or molecular techniques, to increase the accuracy of parasitic detection, as well as consider taking the fecal sample for 3 consecutive days from all patients to prevent prevalence overestimation due to the coprophagy behavior of dogs.
Authors’ Contributions
YR: Study design, interpreted the data, and drafted the manuscript. TITD: Collected the data from medical records, interpreted the data, drafted, and revised the manuscript. ES: Analyzed and interpreted the data drafted, revised the manuscript. NGB: Collected the data from medical records and drafted and revised the manuscript. All authors have read, reviewed, and approved the final manuscript.
Acknowledgments
The authors are thankful to the Executive Director and the staff of the Veterinary Teaching Hospital, School of Veterinary Medicine, and Biomedical Sciences, IPB University, Bogor, for data collection permission and their help and cooperation during data collection. This research was not funded by a specific grant from any funding organization.
Footnotes
This research was not funded by a specific grant from any funding organization.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Veterinary World remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published institutional affiliation.
References
- 1.Nurhayati-Wolff H. Indonesia:Share of pet owners by type of pet 2018. In:Statista. 2022. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/974157/pet-owners-by-type-of-pet-indonesia . Retrieved on 21-01-2023.
- 2.Kirk C.P. Dogs have masters, cats have staff:Consumers'psychological ownership and their economic valuation of pets. J. Bus. Res. 2019;99(2019):306–318. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Amiot C.E, Gagné C, Bastian B. Pet ownership and psychological well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sci. Rep. 2022;12(1):6091. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10019-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Konstantinova A, Matasov V, Filyushkina A, Vasenev V. Perceived benefits and costs of owning a pet in a megapolis:An ecosystem services perspective. Sustainability. 2021;13(19):10596. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Rathish D, Rajapakse J, Weerakoon K. Household preferences for pet keeping:Findings from a rural district of Sri Lanka. PLoS One. 2022;17(11):e0277108. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Machová K, Daďová K, Chaloupková H, Svobodová I. Does having a pet influence the physical activity of their young female owners? BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1672. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7962-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Abere T, Bogale B, Melaku A. Gastrointestinal helminth parasites of pet and stray dogs as a potential risk for human health in Bahir Dar town, North-Western Ethiopia. Vet. World. 2013;6(7):388–392. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Fu Y, Huang Y, Abuzeid A.M.I, Hang J, Yan X, Wang M, Liu Y, Sun Y, Ran R, Zhang P, Li G. Prevalence and potential zoonotic risk of hookworms from stray dogs and cats in Guangdong, China. Vet. Parasitol. Reg. Stud. Rep. 2019;17(2019):100316. doi: 10.1016/j.vprsr.2019.100316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sarvi S, Daryani A, Sharif M, Rahimi M.T, Kohansal M.H, Mirshafiee S, Siyadatpanah A, Hosseini S.A, Gholami S. Zoonotic intestinal parasites of carnivores:A systematic review in Iran. Vet. World. 2018;11(1):58–65. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2018.58-65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tadesse M, Ayana D, Kumsa B, Fromsa A. Zoonotic helminth parasites of dog in Bishoftu Town, central Ethiopia:Prevalence, dog owners'knowledge and control practice. Ethiop. Vet. J. 2020;24(1):93–115. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Baneth G, Thamsborg S.M, Otranto D, Guillot J, Blaga R, Deplazes P, Solano-Gallego L. Major parasitic zoonoses associated with dogs and cats in Europe. J. Comp. Pathol. 2016;155(1Suppl 1):S54–S74. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpa.2015.10.179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Pereira A, Martins Â, Brancal H, Vilhena H, Silva P, Pimenta P, Diz-Lopes D, Neves N, Coimbra M, Alves A.C, Cardoso L, Maia C. Parasitic zoonoses associated with dogs and cats:A survey of Portuguese pet owners'awareness and deworming practices. Parasit. Vectors. 2016;9(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s13071-016-1533-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Simonato G, Danesi P, di Regalbono A.F, Dotto G, Tessarin C, Pietrobelli M, Pasotto1 D. Surveillance of zoonotic parasites in animals involved in animal-assisted interventions (AAIs) Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020;17(21):7914. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chai J.Y, Jung B.K. Foodborne intestinal flukes:A brief review of epidemiology and geographical distribution. Acta Trop. 2020;201(2020):105210. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2019.105210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Nguyen P.T.X, Van Hoang H, Dinh H.T.K, Dorny P, Losson B, Bui D.T, Lempereur L. Insights on foodborne zoonotic trematodes in freshwater snails in North and Central Vietnam. Parasitol. Res. 2021;120(3):949–962. doi: 10.1007/s00436-020-07027-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tenorio J.C.B, Molina E.C. Monsters in our food:Foodborne trematodiasis in the Philippines and beyond. Vet. Integr. Sci. 2021;19(3):467–485. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Fakhri Y, Gasser R.B, Rostami A, Fan C.K, Ghasemi S.M, Javanian M, Bayani M, Armoon B, Moradi B. Toxocara eggs in public places worldwide - A systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ. Pollut. 2018;242(pt B):1467–1475. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.07.087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Oyewole O.E, Simon-Oke I.A. Ecological risk factors of soil-transmitted helminths infections in Ifedore district, Southwest Nigeria. Bull. Natl. Res. Cent. 2022;46(2022):13. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Tyungu D.L, McCormick D, Lau C.L, Chang M, Murphy J.R, Hotez P.J, Mejia R. Toxocara species environmental contamination of public spaces in New York City. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2020;14(2020):e0008249. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Abbas I, Al-Araby M, Elmishmishy B, El-Alfy E.S. Gastrointestinal parasites of cats in Egypt:High prevalence high zoonotic risk. BMC Vet. Res. 2022;18(2022):420. doi: 10.1186/s12917-022-03520-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Awadallah M.A.I, Salem L.M.A. Zoonotic enteric parasites transmitted from dogs in Egypt with special concern to Toxocara canis infection. Vet. World. 2015;8(8):946–957. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2015.946-957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Dantas-Torres F, Otranto D. Dogs, cats, parasites, and humans in Brazil:Opening the black box. Parasit. Vectors. 2014;7(1):22. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-7-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.El-Azazy O, Abdou N.E, Khalil A.I, Al-Batel M, Majeed Q.A, Henedi A.A, Tahrani L.M. Potential zoonotic trematodes recovered in stray cats from Kuwait Municipality, Kuwait. Korean J. Parasitol. 2015;53(3):279–287. doi: 10.3347/kjp.2015.53.3.279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kostopoulou D, Claerebout E, Arvanitis D, Ligda P, Voutzourakis N, Casaert S, Sotiraki S. Abundance, zoonotic potential and risk factors of intestinal parasitism amongst dog and cat populations:The scenario of Crete, Greece. Parasit. Vectors. 2017;10(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-1989-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Morelli S, Diakou A, Di Cesare A, Colombo M, Traversa D. Canine and feline parasitology:Analogies, differences, and relevance for human health. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2021;34(4):e00266–20. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00266-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ortega-Pacheco A, Torres-Acosta J.F.J, Alzina-López A, Gutiérrez-Blanco E, Bolio-González M.E, Aguilar-Caballero A.J, Rodríguez-Vivas R.I, Gutiérrez-Ruiz E, Acosta-Viana K.Y, Guzmán-Marín E, Rosado-Aguilar A, Jiménez-Coello M. Parasitic zoonoses in humans and their dogs from a rural community of tropical Mexico. J. Trop. Med. 2015;2015(2015):481086. doi: 10.1155/2015/481086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Rabbani I.A.R, Mareta F.J, Kusnoto K, Hastutiek P, Lastuti N.D.R, Mufasirin M, Suharsono S, Sardjana I.K.W, Sukmanadi M, Suwanti L.T. Zoonotic and other gastrointestinal parasites in cats in Lumajang, East Java, Indonesia. Infect. Dis. Rep. 2020;12(suppl 1):8747. doi: 10.4081/idr.2020.8747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Symeonidou I, Gelasakis A.I, Arsenopoulos K, Angelou A, Beugnet F, Papadopoulos E. Feline gastrointestinal parasitism in Greece:Emergent zoonotic species and associated risk factors. Parasit. Vectors. 2018;11(1):227. doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-2812-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Traversa D, di Regalbono A.F, Di Cesare A, La Torre F, Drake J, Pietrobelli M. Environmental contamination by canine geohelminths. Parasit. Vectors. 2014;7(1):67. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-7-67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Wolfe A, Wright I.P. Human toxocariasis and direct contact with dogs. Vet. Rec. 2003;152(14):419–422. doi: 10.1136/vr.152.14.419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Eslahi A.V, Badri M, Khorshidi A, Majidiani H, Hooshmand E, Hosseini H, Taghipour A, Foroutan M, Pestehchian N, Firoozeh F, Riahi S.M, Zibaei M. Prevalence of Toxocara and Toxascaris infection among human and animals in Iran with meta-analysis approach. BMC Infect. Dis. 2020;20(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-4759-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Healy S.R, Morgan E.R, Prada J.M, Betson M. Brain food:Rethinking food-borne toxocariasis. Parasitology. 2022;149(1):1–9. doi: 10.1017/S0031182021001591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Stracke K, Jex A.R, Traub R.J. Zoonotic ancylostomiasis:An update of a continually neglected zoonosis. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2020;103(1):64–68. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Traub R.J, Zendejas-Heredia P.A, Massetti L, Colella V. Zoonotic hookworms of dogs and cats - lessons from the past to inform current knowledge and future directions of research. Int. J. Parasitol. 2021;51(13–14):1233–1241. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2021.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Gutema F.D, Yohannes G.W, Abdi R.D, Abuna F, Ayana D, Waktole H, Amenu K, Hiko A, Agga G.E. Dipylidium caninum infection in dogs and humans in Bishoftu town, Ethiopia. Diseases. 2020;9(1):1. doi: 10.3390/diseases9010001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Portokalidou S, Gkentzi D, Stamouli V, Varvarigou A, Marangos M, Spiliopoulou I, Dimitriou G. Dipylidium caninum infection in children:clinical presentation and therapeutic challenges. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2019;38(7):e157–e159. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000002235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Rousseau J, Castro A, Novo T, Maia C. Dipylidium caninum in the twenty-first century:Epidemiological studies and reported cases in companion animals and humans. Parasit. Vectors. 2022;15(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s13071-022-05243-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Beknazarova M, Whiley H, Traub R, Ross K. Opportunistic mapping of Strongyloides stercoralis and hookworm in dogs in remote Australian communities. Pathogens. 2020;9(5):398. doi: 10.3390/pathogens9050398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bradbury R.S, Pafčo B, Nosková E, Hasegawa H. Strongyloides genotyping:A review of methods and application in public health and population genetics. Int. J. Parasitol. 2021;51(13–14):1153–1166. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2021.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Bakhshani A, Maleki M, Haghparast A, Shirvan S.P, Borji H. A survey on Toxocara cati eggs on the hair of stray cats:A potential risk factor for human toxocariasis in Northeastern Iran. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2019;64(2019):10–13. doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2019.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Mizgajska-Wiktor H, Jarosz W, Fogt-Wyrwas R, Drzewiecka A. Distribution and dynamics of soil contamination with Toxocara canis and Toxocara cati eggs in Poland and prevention measures proposed after 20 years of study. Vet. Parasitol. 2017;234(2017):1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2016.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Overgaauw P.A.M, van Knapen F. Veterinary and public health aspects of Toxocara spp. Vet. Parasitol. 2013;193(4):398–403. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.12.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Coello R.D, Pazmiño B.J, Reyes E.O, Rodríguez E.X, Rodas E.I, Rodas K.A, Dávila A.X, Rodas J.P, Cedeño P.P. A case of cutaneous larva migrans in a child from Vinces, Ecuador. Am. J. Case Rep. 2019;20(2019):1402–1406. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.915154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Sharma R, Singh B.B, Gill J.P.S. Larva migrans in India:Veterinary and public health perspectives. J. Parasit. Dis. 2015;39(4):604–612. doi: 10.1007/s12639-013-0402-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Jiang P, Zhang X, Liu R.D, Wang Z.Q, Cui J. A human case of zoonotic dog tapeworm, Dipylidium caninum (Eucestoda:Dilepidiidae), in China. Korean J. Parasitol. 2017;55(1):61–64. doi: 10.3347/kjp.2017.55.1.61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Alvar J, Alves F, Bucheton B, Burrows L, Büscher P, Carrillo E, Felger I, Hübner M.P, Moreno J, Pinazo M.J, Ribeiro I, Sosa-Estani S, Specht S, Tarral A, Wourgaft N.S, Bilbe G. Implications of asymptomatic infection for the natural history of selected parasitic tropical diseases. Semin. Immunopathol. 2020;42(3):231–246. doi: 10.1007/s00281-020-00796-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ghosh K, Ghosh K. Strongyloides stercoralis septicaemia following steroid therapy for eosinophilia:Report of three cases. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2007;101(11):1163–1165. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2007.05.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Akhira D, Fahrimal Y, Hasan M. Identification of gastrointestinal nematode parasites in hunting dogs (Canis familiaris) in the Subdistrict of Lareh Sago Halaban West Sumatera. J. Med. Vet. 2013;7(1):42–45. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Agustina K.K, Anthara M.S, Sibang N.A.A.N, Wiguna W.A.R, Apramada J.K, Gunawan W.N.F, Oka I.B.M, Subrata M, Besung N.K. Prevalence and distribution of soil-transmitted helminth infection in free-roaming dogs in Bali Province, Indonesia. Vet. World. 2021;14(2):446–451. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2021.446-451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Silalahi G.E, Tjahajati I, Nugroho W.S. Incidence proportion, risk factors and blood hematological profile of dogs with a diagnosis of helminthiasis in Gunung Kidul Regency. Int. J. Sci. Adv. 2022;3(3):416–420. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Amissah-Reynolds P.K, Monney I, Adowah L.M, Agyemang S.O. Prevalence of helminths in dogs and owners'awareness of zoonotic diseases in Mampong, Ashanti, Ghana. J. Parasitol. Res. 2016;2016(2016):1715924. doi: 10.1155/2016/1715924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Pumidonming W, Salman D, Gronsang D, Abdelbaset A.E, Sangkaeo K, Kawazu S.I, Igarashi M. Prevalence of gastrointestinal helminth parasites of zoonotic significance in dogs and cats in lower Northern Thailand. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2016;78(12):1779–1784. doi: 10.1292/jvms.16-0293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Wahyudi N.T, Suwanti L.T, Kusnoto K, Mumpuni S, Yudaniayanti I.S, Mafruchati M. Prevalence of helminth eggs in cat feces contaminating public areas in Surabaya. Indones. J. Trop. Infect. Dis. 2017;6(6):154–159. [Google Scholar]
- 54.Purnama A.W.P, Suwanti L.T, Plumeriastuti H, Suprihati E, Kusnoto K, Sunarso A. Prevalence of gastrointestinal parasite on cats in shelter East Surabaya. J. Parasit. Sci. 2019;3(2):47–52. [Google Scholar]
- 55.Muriana A.N.M, Ridwan Y, Tiuria R, Akbari R.A. Helminthiasis on cats in Starvet Clinic Bogor. ARSHI Vet. Lett. 2018;2(4):63–64. [Google Scholar]
- 56.Tun S, Ithoi I, Mahmud R, Samsudin N.I, Heng C.K, Ling L.Y. Detection of helminth eggs and identification of hookworm species in stray cats, dogs and soil from Klang Valley, Malaysia. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e0142231. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Shima K, Tion T, Mosugu I, Apaa T. Retrospective study of disease incidence and other clinical conditions diagnosed in owned dogs in Delta State, Nigeria. J. Adv. Vet. Anim. Res. 2015;2(4):435–449. [Google Scholar]
- 58.Ilić T, Kulišić Z, Antić N, Radisavljević K, Dimitrijević S. Prevalence of zoonotic intestinal helminths in pet dogs and cats in the Belgrade area. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 2017;45(1):204–208. [Google Scholar]
- 59.Ngui R, Lee S.C, Yap N.J, Tan T.K, Aidil R.M, Chua K.H, Aziz S, Sulaiman W.Y.W, Ahmad A.F, Mahmud R, Ai Lian Y.L. Gastrointestinal parasites in rural dogs and cats in Selangor and Pahang states in Peninsular Malaysia. Acta Parasitol. 2014;59(4):737–744. doi: 10.2478/s11686-014-0306-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Zanzani S.A, Gazzonis A.L, Scarpa P, Berrilli F, Manfredi M.T. Intestinal parasites of owned dogs and cats from metropolitan and micropolitan areas:Prevalence, zoonotic risks, and pet owner awareness in Northern Italy. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014;2014(2014):696508. doi: 10.1155/2014/696508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Castro P.D.J, Sapp S.G. Role of cats in human toxocarosis. Companion Anim. 2021;26(1):1–8. doi: 10.12968/coan.2020.0104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Giannelli A, Capelli G, Joachim A, Hinney B, Losson B, Kirkova Z, René-Martellet M, Papadopoulos E, Farkas R, Napoli E, Brianti E, Tamponi C, Varcasia A, Alho A.M, de Carvalho L.M, Cardoso L, Maia C, Mircean V, Mihalca A.D, Miró G, Schnyder M, Cantacessi C, Colella V, Cavalera M.A, Latrofa M.S, Annoscia G, Knaus M, Halos L, Beugnet F, Otranto D. Lungworms and gastrointestinal parasites of domestic cats:A European perspective. Int. J. Parasitol. 2017;47(9):517–528. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2017.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Giraldo-Forero J.C, Muñoz-Niño L.A, Coronado-Castiblanco K.V. Severe iron anemia deficiency caused by hookworm:Case report and literature review. Rev. Med. Hosp. Gen. Mex. 2019;82(4):215–220. [Google Scholar]
- 64.Oguz B, Ozdal N, Deger M.S. Genetic analysis of Toxocara spp. in stray cats and dogs in Van province, Eastern Turkey. J. Vet. Res. 2018;62(3):291–295. doi: 10.2478/jvetres-2018-0042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Hopkins S.R, Jones I.J, Buck J.C, LeBoa C, Kwong L.H, Jacobsen K, Rickards C, Lund A.J, Nova N, MacDonald A.J, Lambert-Peck M, De Leo G.A, Sokolow S.H. Environmental persistence of the world's most burdensome infectious and parasitic diseases. Front. Public Health. 2022;10(2022):892366. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.892366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Kuris A.M. The global burden of human parasites:Who and where are they?How are they transmitted? J. Parasitol. 2012;98(6):1056–1064. doi: 10.1645/12-90.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Subrata I.M, Oka I.B.M, Agustina K.K. Prevalence of intestinal worm in free ranging domestic cats in Bali. J. Vet. 2017;18(3):441–445. [Google Scholar]
- 68.Yudhana A, Praja R.N. Prevalence of Gastrointestinal Helminth Parasite in Stray Cat in Banyuwangi City. J. Med. Vet. 2018;1(1):1–5. [Google Scholar]
- 69.Dharma I.P.P.N, Oka I.B.M, Dharmawan N.S. The prevalence of Ancylostoma spp. infection in dogs on tourism area in Bali. Indones. Med. Vet. 2017;6(3):230–237. [Google Scholar]
- 70.Urgel M.F.M, Ybañez R.H.D, Ybañez A.P. The detection of gastrointestinal parasites in owned and shelter dogs in Cebu, Philippines. Vet. World. 2019;12(3):372–376. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2019.372-376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Erawan I.G.M.K, Widyastuti S.K, Suartha I.N. Prevalence and intensity of infection of Ancylostoma spp. in dogs in Java. Indones. Med. Vet. 2016;5(2):175–181. [Google Scholar]
- 72.De S, Gupta M.P, Singla L.D, Sood N.K. Copro-prevalence of hookworm infection and associated risk factors in pet dogs in Ludhiana. J. Anim. Res. 2017;7(2):409–413. [Google Scholar]
- 73.Murniati M, Sudarnika E, Ridwan Y. Prevalence and risk factors of Toxocara cati infection in Bogor pet cats. J. Kedokt. Hewan Indones. J. Vet. Sci. 2016;10(2):139–142. [Google Scholar]
- 74.Sianturi C.L.J, Priyanto D, Astuti N.T. Identifikasi Telur Toxocara cati dari Feses Kucing di Kecamatan Banjarnegara. Bawang dan Purwareja Klampok Kabupaten Banjarnegara, Medsains. 2016;2:25–30. [Google Scholar]
- 75.Suroiyah F.A, Hastutiek P, Yudhana A, Sunarso A, Muhammad M. Prevalence of Toxocara cati infection on domestic cat in Banyuwangi district. J. Med. Vet. 2018;1(3):99. [Google Scholar]
- 76.Rostami A, Riahi S.M, Hofmann A, Ma G, Wang T, Behniafar H, Taghipour A, Fakhri Y, Spotin A, Chang B.C, Macpherson C.N.L, Hotez P.J, Gasser R.B. Global prevalence of Toxocara infection in dogs. Adv. Parasitol. 2020;109(2020):561–583. doi: 10.1016/bs.apar.2020.01.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Holland C.V. Knowledge gaps in the epidemiology of Toxocara :The enigma remains. Parasitology. 2017;144(1):81–94. doi: 10.1017/S0031182015001407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Maurelli M.P, Santaniello A, Fioretti A, Cringoli G, Rinaldi L, Menna L.F. The presence of Toxocara eggs on dog's fur as potential zoonotic risk in animal-assisted interventions:A systematic review. Animals (Basel) 2019;9(10):827. doi: 10.3390/ani9100827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Rostami A, Sepidarkish M, Ma G, Wang T, Ebrahimi M, Fakhri Y, Mirjalali H, Hofmann A, Macpherson C.N.L, Hotez P.J, Gasser R.B. Global prevalence of Toxocara infection in cats. Adv. Parasitol. 2020;109(2020):615–639. doi: 10.1016/bs.apar.2020.01.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Sowemimo O.A, Ayanniyi O.O. Presence of Toxocara eggs on the hairs of dogs from Southwest Nigeria. J. Bacteriol. Parasitol. 2016;7(6):1000296. [Google Scholar]
- 81.Kleine A, Springer A, Strube C. Seasonal variation in the prevalence of Toxocara eggs on children's playgrounds in the city of Hanover, Germany. Parasit. Vectors. 2017;10(1):248. doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2193-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Otero D, Alho A.M, Nijsse R, Roelfsema J, Overgaauw P, de Carvalho L.N. Environmental contamination with Toxocara spp. eggs in public parks and playground sandpits of Greater Lisbon, Portugal. J. Infect. Public Health. 2018;11(1):94–98. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2017.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Vanhee M, Dalemans A.C, Viaene J, Depuydt L, Claerebout E. Toxocara in sandpits of public playgrounds and kindergartens in Flanders (Belgium) Vet. Parasitol. Reg. Stud. Reports. 2015;1–2(2015):51–54. doi: 10.1016/j.vprsr.2016.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Hajipour N. A survey on the prevalence of Toxocara cati, Toxocara canis and Toxascaris leonina eggs in stray dogs and cats'faeces in Northwest of Iran:A potential risk for human health. Trop. Biomed. 2019;36(1):143–151. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Nijsse R, Mughini-Gras L, Wagenaar J.A, Ploeger H.W. Coprophagy in dogs interferes in the diagnosis of parasitic infections by faecal examination. Vet. Parasitol. 2014;204(3–4):304–309. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.05.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Oudni-M'Rad M, Chaâbane-Banaoues R, M'Rad S, Trifa F, Mezhoud H, Babba H. Gastrointestinal parasites of canids, a latent risk to human health in Tunisia. Parasit. Vectors. 2017;10(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2208-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Farantika R, Susanti R. The prevalence of alimentary tract worms in domestic cats and stray cats at campus area of Semarang State University, Central Java. J. Vet. 2019;20(3):316–323. [Google Scholar]
- 88.Moskvina T.V, Atopkin D.M. The prevalence of intestinal parasites of domestic cats and dogs in Vladivostok, Russia during 2014–2017. Zool. Ecol. 2018;28(3):180–184. [Google Scholar]
- 89.Bashofi A.S, Soviana S, Ridwan Y. Flea infestation and Dipylidium caninum (Linnaeus) infection on stray cat in campus area of Bogor Agricultural University, Dramaga Bogor. J. Entomol. Indones. 2015;12(2):108–114. [Google Scholar]
- 90.[ESCCAP] European Scientific Counsel Companion Animal Parasites. Birkhauser Verlag ag Viadukstrasse Po Box 133. Ch. 4010. European Scientific Counsel Companion Animal Parasites (ESCCAP), Basel, Switzerland. 2016:40–44. [Google Scholar]
- 91.Beugnet F, Labuschagne M, de Vos C, Crafford D, Fourie J. Analysis of Dipylidium caninum tapeworms from dogs and cats, or their respective fleas:Part 2. Distinct canine and feline host association with two different Dipylidium caninum genotypes. Parasite. 2018;25(2018):31. doi: 10.1051/parasite/2018029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Chelladurai J.J, Kifleyohannes T, Scott J, Brewer M.T. Praziquantel resistance in the zoonotic cestode Dipylidium caninum. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2018;99(5):1201–1205. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Hossain M.S, Islam A, Labony S.S, Hossain M.M, Alim M.A, Anisuzzaman A. Clinical presentation, diagnosis and therapeutic management of Dipylidium caninum (Cestoda:Dilepididae) infection in a domestic cat (Felis catus):A case report. Insights Vet. Sci. 2021;5(2021):24–25. [Google Scholar]
- 94.Yadav S, Patel P.K, Deepak D, Yadav S, Parte S. Medical management of Dipylidium caninum infected female cat:A case report. Int. J. Chem. Stud. 2019;7(1):550–552. [Google Scholar]
- 95.Traversa D. Pet roundworms and hookworms:A continuing need for global worming. Parasit. Vectors. 2012;5(2012):91. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-5-91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Johnson S.A.M, Gakuya D.W, Mbuthia P.G, Mande J.D, Maingi N. Prevalence of gastrointestinal helminths and management practices for dogs in the Greater Accra region of Ghana. Heliyon. 2015;1(1):e00023. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2015.e00023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Barutzki D, Schaper R. Results of parasitological examinations of faecal samples from cats and dogs in Germany between 2003 and 2010. Parasitol. Res. 2011;109(suppl 1):45–60. doi: 10.1007/s00436-011-2402-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Tamerat N, Abera D, Teha R, Terefe Y, Lemma F. Cat and dog gastrointestinal helminth and assessment of community perception on helminthic zoonosis in Haramaya town, eastern Ethiopia. Am. Eurasian J. Sci. Res. 2015;10(5):299–306. [Google Scholar]
- 99.Martins C.M, de Barros C.C, Bier D, Marinho A.P, Figueiredo J.M.G, Hoffmann J.L, Molento M.B, Biondo A.W. Dog parasite incidence and risk factors, from sampling after one-year interval, in Pinhais, Brazil. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet. 2012;21(2):101–106. doi: 10.1590/s1984-29612012000200006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Ridwan Y, Wicaksono A, Fransiska S.V, Theresa P. Prevalence and risk factors of hookworms infection on dogs in Sukabumi Regency, West Java Province, Indonesia. J. Kedokt. Hewan Indones. J. Vet. Sci. 2020;14(4):85–89. [Google Scholar]
- 101.Shepherd C, Wangchuk P, Loukas A. Of dogs and hookworms:Man's best friend and his parasites as a model for translational biomedical research. 2018 doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-2621-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
