Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Sep 28.
Published in final edited form as: J Neuroendocrinol. 2023 Mar 7;35(9):e13245. doi: 10.1111/jne.13245

Parallel trajectories in the discovery of the SCN-OVLT and Pituitary Portal pathways: Legacies of Geoffrey Harris

Rae Silver 1,2,3,*, Yifan Yao 2, Ranjan K Roy 4, Javier E Stern 4
PMCID: PMC10423749  NIHMSID: NIHMS1879440  PMID: 36880566

Abstract

A map of CNS organization based on vascular networks provides a layer of organization that is distinct from familiar neural networks or connectomes. As a well-established example, the capillary networks of the pituitary portal system enable a route for small amounts of neurochemical signals to reach local targets by travelling along specialized pathways thereby avoiding dilution in the systemic circulation. The first evidence of such a pathway in the brain came from anatomical studies of Popa and Fielding1. They identified a portal pathway linking the hypothalamus and the pituitary gland. Almost a century later, we demonstrated a vascular portal pathway joining the capillary beds of the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) and a circumventricular organ, the organum vasculosum of the lamina terminalis (OVLT) in a mouse brain 2. For each of these portal pathways, the anatomical findings opened many new lines of inquiry including the determination of the direction of flow of information, the identity of the signal that flowed along this pathway and the function of the signals that linked the two regions. Here we review these landmark steps to discovery and highlight the experiments that reveal significance of portal pathways generally and more generally, the implications of sharing capillary beds by morphologically distinct nuclei.

Keywords: neurohormones, angiome, iDisco, blood flow, hypothalamus, circumventricular organ

I. Introduction

Portal pathways in the brain and the importance of vascular communication.

A map of CNS organization based on vascular networks or angiomes 3 provides a layer of organization that is distinct from familiar neural networks or connectomes. As a well-established example, the capillary networks of the pituitary portal system enable a route for small amounts of neurochemical signals to reach local targets by travelling along specialized pathways thereby avoiding dilution in the systemic circulation. The first evidence of this vascular pathway in the brain came from anatomical studies. Specifically, Popa and Fielding 1,4 identified a portal pathway linking the hypothalamus and the pituitary gland. Their anatomical work was based on haematoxylin and eosin-stained sections of the human brain. They also provided an extensive discussion of the observations of previous students of this brain region. Based on the available literature, and the appearance of india ink in the hypothalamus after it had been injected into the anterior pituitary, they strenuously argued that the direction of blood flow was from the pituitary gland to the hypothalamus.

“…in 1930, we stated the fact that there is a system of veins taking origin from the sinusoids of the buccal portion of the hypophysis and from the capillaries of the neural portion, which ascend through the stalk to the region of the floor of the infundibular recess of the 3rd ventricle where they break up into a secondary capillary net. As they ascend, these run first in the substance of the pars tuberalis, mostly in front of the stalk, and then at various levels penetrate into the neural portion of the stalk and ascend within “glial sleeves” towards the floor of the infundibular recess, where they lose their glial wrapping and break up into the secondary net.

Almost a century later, we demonstrated a vascular portal pathway joining the capillary beds of the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) and a circumventricular organ, the organum vasculosum of the lamina terminalis (OVLT) in a mouse brain 2. For each of these portal pathways, the anatomical findings opened many new questions and lines of inquiry including the determination of the direction of flow of information, the identity of the signal that flowed along this pathway and the function of the signals that linked the two regions.

Once the portal pathway had been identified anatomically, definitive proof of its importance required much more research. It was important to identify putative chemical(s) that flowed within this pathway, to determine the source and target of the chemical, to characterize the chemical(s) itself and determine their function. In the case of the pituitary portal system, it took decades from the anatomical characterization of portal vessels to the definitive proof of the important function of this pathway. Today, an opus widely credited with resolving the question of direction of communication between hypothalamus and pituitary is the publication of Harris’s 1955 book (Neural control of the pituitary gland.by 5. Despite the positive review of his book, it took intense competitive research activity for many years, a huge amount of money, large numbers of animals, and the Nobel prize-winning work (1972) of Guillemin and Schally, to definitively identify the neurosecretions that flow in the pituitary portal system. A timeline of landmarks and discoveries lays out the work that must be done in the case of the SCN-OVLT neurovascular pathway.

Goal of the present review:

Our aim is to document the enormous numbers of Harris’s experimental studies (with collaborators) that contributed to accepted that his thinking about hypothalamic-pituitary relationships. A second goal is to identify landmark events in the establishment of the pituitary portal system as a signaling pathway between the hypothalamus and the pituitary and to describe parallels in the landmark studies of the SCN-OVLT portal pathways. Discoveries in each of these portal pathways involves the following elements: delineation of the anatomy proving existence of a vascular connection between the capillary beds of anatomically distinct regions, demonstrating the existence of such a portal pathway in several species, tissue transplant studies proving the existence of a diffusible neurochemical signal, determination of the direction of blood flow to determine the source and target of chemical neurosecretions, and identification of the chemical secretions that travel in the portal vasculature. We describe the decades-long time interval and sometimes hostile debate from the work of Popa and Fielding to the definitive determination of the direction of blood flow in the case of the pituitary portal system and indicate how currently available methods hasten discovery. Finally, we consider the possibility that there are additional portal pathways between circumventricular organs and adjacent neuropil.

Why do we care?

Highlighting the immense importance of these two portal systems is the fact that while each involves signals from a relatively small population of neurons to a local target, the downstream consequences are global, impacting tissues and organs throughout the entire body (Figure 1). In the case of the pituitary gland, hormonal secretions reach their targets via the systemic blood supply. In the case of the SCN-OVLT, we consider that the flow of information is most likely from the clock to the OVLT. In that case, the signal from the SCN reaches a target in the OVLT which in turn communicates throughout the brain via the CSF. There is a vast literature from our lab and others on body-wide effects of each of these systems69.

Figure 1. A small population of hypothalamic neurons achieve a broad, body-wide impact.

Figure 1

Left panel: The neurosecretory neurons of the hypothalamus produce releasing hormones such as CRF, GnRH, etc. These peptides travel to the median eminence and reach the anterior pituitary gland via the pituitary portal system. Pituitary hormones act on tissues throughout the body. Right panel: The suprachiasmatic nucleus acts as a brain clock. Retinal input to the SCN enables the brain clock to synchronize to local time, and output from this clock sets the phase of oscillators in organs and tissues throughout the body.

II. Landmarks in the establishment of the pituitary portal system: 1930-1972

Harris’s book, Neural Control of the Pituitary Gland 5 is often credited with being the document that led to the acceptance of the notion of a portal system in which the brain regulated pituitary hormones. The reality is that Harris studied this problem for decades prior to publishing his book (Figure 2, Table 1). His work was based on functional, anatomical, transplant, and vascular studies and a substantial number of careful literature reviews. Impressively, very early on, Harris postulated that transmission of information occurred from the median eminence to the anterior pituitary, while recognizing that definitive information was lacking 10. He spent his research life gathering definitive studies.

Figure 2. Harris’s timeline of publications up to 1955.

Figure 2

The timeline highlights Harris’s steady stream of empirical papers (open circles) and thoughtful reviews (closed circles) in the years leading to the publication of his famous, field-defining book in 1955.

Table 1.

G.W. Harris Publications

Year Reference
1936 Harris, G. W. (1936). The induction of pseudo-pregnancy in the rat by electrical stimulation through the head. The Journal of physiology, 88(3), 361–367. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1936.sp003446
1937 Harris, G. W. (1937). The Induction of Ovulation in the Rabbit, by Electrical Stimulation of the Hypothalamo-hypophysial Mechanism. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 122(828), 374–394. doi:10.1098/rspb.1937.0031
1938 Harris G. W. (1938). A Technique for Operations on the Hypothalamo-Hypophysial Region of the Rabbit. Journal of anatomy, 72(Pt 2), 226–233. PMID: 17104686
1941 Harris, G. W. (1941). Further evidence concerning the role of the hypothalamus in the induction of ovulation in the rabbit following injections of copper acetate. The Journal of physiology, 100(2), 231–232. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1941.sp003936
1946 Green, J. D., & Harris, G. W. (1946). The neurovascular link between the neurohypophysis and adenohypophysis, Journal of Endocrinology, 5(5), 136-NP. 10.1677/joe.0.0050136
1947 Harris, G. W. (1947). The blood vessels of the rabbit’s pituitary gland, and the significance of the pars and zona tuberalis. Journal of anatomy, 81(Pt 4), 343–351. PMID: 17105039
1947 Green, J. D., & Harris, G. W. (1947). The neurovascular link between the neurohypophysis and adenohypophysis. The Journal of endocrinology, 5(3), 136–146. https://doi.org/10.1677/joe.0.0050136
1947 Harris, G. W. (1947). The innervation and actions of the neuro-hypophysis; an investigation using the method of remote-control stimulation. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 232(590), 385–441. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1947.0002
1948 Harris, G. W. (1948). Electrical stimulation of the hypothalamus and the mechanism of neural control of the adenohypophysis. The Journal of physiology, 107(4), 418–429. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1948.sp004286
1948 Harris, G. W. (1948). Hypothalamus and pituitary gland with special reference to the posterior pituitary and labour. British medical journal, 1(4546), 339–342. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.4546.339
1948 Harris, G. W. (1948). Neural control of the pituitary gland. Physiological reviews, 28(2), 139–179. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.1948.28.2.139
1948 Harris, G. W. (1948). Regeneration of the hypophysial portal vessels. Nature, 162(4133), 70. https://doi.org/10.1038/163070a0
1948 Harris, G. W. (1948). Stimulation of the supraopticohypophysial tract in the conscious rabbit with currents of different wave form. The Journal of physiology, 107(4), 412–417. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1948.sp004285
1948 Harris, G. W. (1948). The hypothalamus and water metabolism. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 41(10), 661–666. PMID: 18100746
1949 Green, J. D., & Harris, G. W. (1949). Observation of the hypophysio-portal vessels of the living rat. The Journal of physiology, 108(3), 359–361. PMID: 18149770
1949 Harris G. W. (1949). Ovulation in the rabbit. Journal of anatomy, 83(Pt 1), 82. PMID: 18224834
1949 Harris, G. W. (1949). Pituitary stalk in relation to oestrous rhythm and pseudo-pregnancy in rats. The Journal of physiology, 109(1–2), 17P–21. PMID: 15407435
1949 Parkes, A. S., & Harris, G. W. (1949). Symposium on neuro-hormonal mechanisms. The Journal of endocrinology, 6(2). PMID: 15392925
1950 De Groot, J., & Harris, G. W. (1950). Hypothalmic control of the anterior pituitary gland and blood lymphocytes. The Journal of physiology, 111(3-4), 335–346. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1950.sp004483
1950 Harris, G. W. (1950). Hypothalamo-hypophysial connexions in the Cetacea. The Journal of physiology, 111(3-4), 361–367. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1950.sp004485 PMID: 14795445
1950 Cross, B. A., & Harris, G. W. (1950). Milk ejection following electrical stimulation of the pituitary stalk in rabbits. Nature, 166(4232), 994–995. https://doi.org/10.1038/166994b0
1950 Harris, G. W. (1950). Oestrous rhythm. Pseudopregnancy and the pituitary stalk in the rat. The Journal of physiology, 111(3-4), 347–360. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1950.sp004484
1950 Colfer, H. F., De Groot, J., & Harris, G. W. (1950). Pituitary gland and blood lymphocytes. The Journal of physiology, 111(3-4), 328–334. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1950.sp004482
1950 Harris, G. W., & Jacobsohn, D. (1950). Proliferative capacity of the hypophysial portal vessels. Nature, 165(4204), 854. https://doi.org/10.1038/165854a0
1950 Harris, G. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1950). Regeneration of the hypophysial portal vessels, after section of the hypophysial stalk, in the monkey (Macacus rhesus). Nature, 165(4203), 819–820. https://doi.org/10.1038/165819b0
1950 Harris, G. W. (1950). The hypothalamus and endocrine glands. British medical bulletin, 6(4), 345–350. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a073628
1951 Harris, G. W. (1951). Neural control of the pituitary gland. I. The neurohypophysis. British medical journal, 2(4731), 559–564. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.2.4731.559
1951 Harris, G. W. (1951). Neural control of the pituitary gland. II. The adenohypophysis, with special reference to the secretion of A.C.T.H. British medical journal, 2(4732), 627–634. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.2.4732.627
1952 Harris, G. W., & Jacobsohn, D. (1952). Functional grafts of the anterior pituitary gland. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 139(895), 263–276. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1952.0011
1952 Cross, B. A., & Harris, G. W. (1952). The role of the neurohypophysis in the milk-ejection reflex. The Journal of endocrinology, 8(2), 148–161. https://doi.org/10.1677/joe.0.0080148
1953 Harris, G.W. The physiology of the hypothalamus and pituitary gland in relationship to gynaecology. Arch. Gynak. 183, 35–48 (1953). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01004841
1953 Harris, G. W., & Pickles, V. R. (1953). Reflex stimulation of the neurohypophysis (posterior pituitary gland) and the nature of posterior pituitary hormone (s). Nature, 172(4388), 1049. https://doi.org/10.1038/1721049a0
1953 Harris G. W. (1953). The physiology of the hypothalamus and pituitary gland in relationship to gynaecology. Archiv fur Gynakologie, 183, 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01004841
1953 Harris, G. W., & Holton, P. (1953). Vasodilator activity in extracts of various regions of the central nervous system. The Journal of physiology, 120(1-2), 254–256. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1953.sp004890
1954 Donovan, B. T., & Harris, G. W. (1954). Effect of pituitary stalk section light-induced oestrus in the ferret. Nature, 174(4428), 503–504. https://doi.org/10.1038/174503a0
1954 Harris, G. W. (1954). Recent advances concerning the relationship between the hypothalamus and pituitary gland. Acta physiologica et pharmacologica Neerlandica, 3(2), 289–298. PMID: 13180369
1954 Brown-Grant, K., Harris, G. W., & Reichlin, S. (1954). The effect of emotional and physical stress on thyroid activity in the rabbit. The Journal of physiology, 126(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1954.sp005189
1954 Brown-Grant, K., Harris, G. W., & Reichlin, S. (1954). The influence of the adrenal cortex on thyroid activity in the rabbit. The Journal of physiology, 126(1), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1954.sp005190
1954 Brown-Grant, K., Von Euler, C., Harris, G. W., & Reichlin, S. (1954). The measurement and experimental modification of thyroid activity in the rabbit. The Journal of physiology, 126(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1954.sp005188
1955 Donovan, B. T., & Harris, G. W. (1955). Neurohumoral mechanisms in reproduction. British medical bulletin, 11(2), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a069482
1955 Harris, G. W. (1955). Pituitary-hypothalamic mechanisms. A.M.A. archives of neurology and psychiatry, 73(2), 124–126. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneurpsyc.1955.02330080002002
1955 Harris, G. W. (1955). The function of the pituitary stalk. Bulletin of the Johns Hopkins Hospital, 97(5), 358–375. PMID: 13269997
1956 Donovan, B. T., & Harris, G. W. (1956). Adrenergic agents and the release of gonadotrophic hormone in the rabbit. The Journal of physiology, 132(3), 577–585. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1956.sp005550
1956 Donovan, B. T., & Harris, G. W. (1956). The effect of pituitary stalk section on light-induced oestrus in the ferret. The Journal of physiology, 131(1), 102–114. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1956.sp005447
1956 Harris, G. W., & Woods, J. W. (1956). Aetiology of Graves’s disease in relation to recent experimental findings. British medical journal, 2(4995), 737–739. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.2.4995.737
1956 Harris, G. W., & Woods, J. W. (1956). Electrical stimulation of the hypothalamus and thyroid activity. Nature, 178(4524), 80–81. https://doi.org/10.1038/178080a0
1956 Harris G. W. (1956). Hypothalamic regulation of anterior pituitary secretion. Schweizerische medizinische Wochenschrift, 86(44), 1252–1255.
1956 Taurog, A., Harris, G. W., Tong, W., & Chaikoff, I. L. (1956). The uptake of I 131-labeled thyroxine and triiodothyronine by the neurohypophysis. Endocrinology, 59(1), 34–47. https://doi.org/10.1210/endo-59-1-34
1957 Campbell, H. J., & Harris, G. W. (1957). The volume of the pituitary and median eminence in stalk-sectioned rabbits. The Journal of physiology, 136(2), 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1957.sp005764
1957 Donovan, B. T., & Harris, G. W. (1957). Pituitary and adrenal glands. Annual review of physiology, 19, 439–466. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ph.19.030157.002255
1957 Fortier, C., Harris, G. W., & McDonald, I. R. (1957). The effect of pituitary stalk section on the adrenocortical response to stress in the rabbit. The Journal of physiology, 136(2), 344–363. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1957.sp005765
1957 Brown-Grant, K., Harris, G. W., & Reichlin, S. (1957). The effect of pituitary stalk section on thyroid function in the rabbit. The Journal of physiology, 136(2), 364–379. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1957.sp005766
1958 Harris, G. W. (1958). The central nervous system, neurohypophysis and milk ejection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 149(936), 336–353. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1958.0074
1958 Harris, G. W., & Woods, J. W. (1958). The effect of electrical stimulation of the hypothalamus or pituitary gland on thyroid activity. The Journal of physiology, 143(2), 246–274. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1958.sp006057
1960 Campbell, H. J., George, R., & Harris, G. W. (1960). The acute effects of injection of thyrotrophic hormone or of electrical stimulation of the hypothalamus on thyroid activity. The Journal of physiology, 152(3), 527–544. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006507
1960 Harris, G. W. (1960). Central nervous control of gonadotrophic and thyrotrophic secretion. Acta endocrinologica. Supplementum, (Suppl 50), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.1530/acta.0.xxxivs015
1962 Harris, G. W. (1962). Neuroendocrine relations. Research publications - Association for Research in Nervous and Mental Disease, 40, 380–405.
1964 Harris, G. W. (1964). Sex hormones, brain development and brain function. Endocrinology, 75, 627–648. https://doi.org/10.1210/endo-75-4-627
1964 Harris, G. W., & Michael, R. P. (1964). The activation of sexual behaviour by hpothalamic implants of oestrogen. The Journal of physiology, 171(2), 275–301. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007377
1964 Harris, G. W. (1964). The central nervous system and the endocrine glands. Triangle; the Sandoz journal of medical science, 7, 242–251.
1964 Harris, G. W. (1964). The development of ideas regarding hypothalamic-releasing factors. Metabolism: clinical and experimental, 13, 1171–1176. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0026-0495(64)80034-2
1964 Campbell, H. J., Feuer, G., & Harris, G. W. (1964). The effect of intrapituitary infusion of median eminence and other brain extracts on anterior pituitary gonadotrophic secretion. The Journal of physiology, 170(3), 474–486. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007344
1964 Harris, G. W., Levine, S., & Schindler, W. J. (1964). Vasopressin and thyroid function in the rat: the effect of oestrogens. The Journal of physiology, 170(3), 516–523. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007346
1965 Harris, G. W. (1965). Entwicklung und heutiger stand der neuroendokrinologie [development and present status of neuroendocrinology]. Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 90, 61–65. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1111294
1965 Harris, G. W., & Levine, S. (1965). Sexual differentiation of the brain and its experimental control. The Journal of physiology, 181(2), 379–400. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007768
1966 Harris, G. W., Reed, M., & Fawcett, C. P. (1966). Hypothalamic releasing factors and the control of anterior pituitary function. British medical bulletin, 22(3), 266–272. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a070485
1967 Harris G. W. (1967). Elaboration et excrétion des hormones gonadostimulantes. Introduction [Production and excretion of gonadostimulant hormones. Introduction]. Archives d’anatomie microscopique et de morphologie experimentale, 56(3), 385–389.
1968 Dewhurst, K. E., el-Kabir, D. J., Harris, G. W., & Mandelbrote, D. M. (1968). A review of the effect of stress on the activity of the central nervous-pituitary-thyroid axis in animals and man. Confinia neurologica, 30(3), 161–196.
1968 Dewhurst, K. E., Kabir, D. J., Exley, D., Harris, G. W., & Mandelbrote, B. M. (1968). Blood-levels of thyrotrophic hormone, protein-bound iodine, and cortisol in schizophrenia and affective states. Lancet (London, England), 2(7579), 1160–1162. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(68)91639-5
1968 Exley, D., Gellert, R. J., Harris, G. W., & Nadler, R. D. (1968). The site of action of ‘chlormadinone acetate’ (6-chloro-delta 6-dehydro-17 alpha-acetoxyprogesterone) in blocking ovulation in the mated rabbit. The Journal of physiology, 195(3), 697–714. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008483
1968 Fawcett, C. P., Reed, M., Charlton, H. M., & Harris, G. W. (1968). The purification of luteinizing-hormone-releasing factor with some observations on its properties. The Biochemical journal, 106(1), 229–236. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj1060229
1969 Dewhurst, K. E., El Kabir, D. J., Harris, G. W., & Mandelbrote, B. M. (1969). Observations on the blood concentration of thyrotrophic hormone (T.S.H.) in schizophrenia and the affective states. The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science, 115(526), 1003–1011. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.115.526.1003
1969 Harris, G. W., Manabe, Y., & Ruf, K. B. (1969). A study of the parameters of electrical stimulation of unmyelinated fibres in the pituitary stalk. The Journal of physiology, 203(1), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008850
1969 Harris G. W. (1969). Ovulation. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 105(5), 659–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(69)90002-7
1969 Harris, G. W., & Sherratt, R. M. (1969). The action of chlormadinone acetate (6-chloro-delta6-dehydro-17alpha-acetoxyprogesterone) upon experimentally induced ovulation in the rabbit. The Journal of physiology, 203(1), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008849
1969 Whitteridge, D., & Harris, G. W. (1969). Royal Commission on Medical Education. Lancet (London, England), 1(7584), 48. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(69)91003-4
1970 Anderson, R. M., Harris, G. W., DeFilippi, R. P., Weber, D. C., Malchesky, P. S., & Nosé, Y. (1970). A liquid-liquid contactor for extracorporeal blood oxygenation. Transactions - American Society for Artificial Internal Organs, 16, 375–380.
1970 Bayman, I. W., Harris, G. W., & Naftolin, F. (1970). Bio-radioimmunoassay of luteinizing hormone releasing factor using untreated immature rats. The Journal of physiology, 210(1), 3P–4P.
1970 Fink, G., & Harris, G. W. (1970). The luteinizing hormone releasing activity of extracts of blood from the hypophysial portal vessels of rats. The Journal of physiology, 208(1), 221–241. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009115
1970 Harris G. W. (1970). Effects of the nervous system on the pituitary-adrenal activity. Progress in brain research, 32, 86–88.
1970 Harris G. W. (1970). Hormonal differentiation of the developing central nervous system with respect to patterns of endocrine function. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 259(828), 165–177. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1970.0056
1970 Harris, G. W., & Ruf, K. B. (1970). Luteinizing hormone releasing factor in rat hypophysial portal blood collected during electrical stimulation of the hypothalamus. The Journal of physiology, 208(1), 243–250. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009116
1970 Harris G. W. (1970). Structure and function of the median eminence. The American journal of anatomy, 129(2), 245–246. https://doi.org/10.1002/aja.1001290212
1970 Harris, G. W., & Naftolin, F. (1970). The hypothalamus and control of ovulation. British medical bulletin, 26(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a070739
1970 Harris, G. W., Anderson, R. M., DeFilippi, R. P., Nosé, Y., Weber, D. C., & Malchesky, P. S. (1970). The physiological effects of fluorocarbon liquids in blood oxygenation. Journal of biomedical materials research, 4(3), 313–339. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820040305
1971 Harris G. W. (1971). Coordination of the reproductive processes. Journal of biosocial science. Supplement, (3), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021932000023634
1971 Naftolin, F., Harris, G. W., & Bobrow, M. (1971). Effect of purified luteinizing hormone releasing factor on normal and hypogonadotrophic anosmic men. Nature, 232(5311), 496–497. https://doi.org/10.1038/232496a0
1972 Cahill, G. F., Jr, Soeldner, J. S., Harris, G. W., & Foster, R. O. (1972). Practical developments in diabetes research. Diabetes, 21(2 Suppl), 703–712. https://doi.org/10.2337/diab.21.2.s703
1972 Harris G. W. (1972). Humours and hormones. The Journal of endocrinology, 53(2), 2–23.

It is widely accepted that, before Harris’s work, it was not known how the brain communicated with the endocrine system 1119. It was well appreciated, however, that external stimuli, such as environmental cues related to seasons and availability of food and water, influenced hormones and behavior. The underlying mechanisms, however, were unknown and research areas now known as Neuroendocrinology or Behavioral Endocrinology were nonexistent 4,20,21. Harris’s lifelong work focused on how the hypothalamus communicated with the endocrine system. For decades, he performed a great number of studies and wrote many review papers on the topic. The depth and quality of Harris’s contributions is evident in a timeline of his publications up to the time of the publication of his book in 1955 (Table 1).

Anatomical studies of the pituitary vascular portal system:

The earliest evidence of the existence of a portal vascular pathway from brain to pituitary came from anatomical studies. In their preliminary note 4, Popa and Fielding provided no data, but stated their claim as follows: “We have observed in the stalk (s) of the human pituitary a system of vessels arranged after the manner of a portal system, which we propose to call the hypophyseo-portal veins”. In their subsequent paper 1, they provided photomicrographs of haematoxylin and eosin stained serial sections documenting their work. Popa and Fielding’s anatomical findings were quickly confirmed and accepted. In part, this was due to the fact that the neurovascular portal pathways are so highly conserved in the vertebrate brains. Harris and his collaborators were among those who contributed anatomical evidence for a neurovascular link between the hypophysis and anterior pituitary gland. They showed, in rats, rabbits, blue whales, monkeys and human that the vascular link of the anterior pituitary was distinct from the neural innervation of the posterior pituitary 2225.

Functions of the hypothalamus-pituitary communications:

Harris’ earliest publications focused on mechanisms whereby the brain-controlled ovulation in the rabbit and pseudo pregnancy in the rat. The rabbit, an induced ovulatory, produces a surge of GnRH following stimulation of the perivaginal region, such as occurs during mating. In rats, pseudopregnancy is evident after stimulation of the perivaginal region, in the absence of mating and sperm. Each of these models provides a fabulous system for understanding how external stimulation can produce changes in hormone secretion 10,26. His research along these lines inevitably led Harris to the hypothesis that neural secretions modulated hormone secretions of anterior pituitary control. As noted by Fink in his review, the idea had been suggested previously27,28. While Harris was not first in supporting this idea, he spent much of his research career performing experiments to study the underlying mechanisms and he published prolifically.

Development of techniques:

To study the mechanisms producing ovulation and pseudopregnancy in these models, Harris developed a technique for electrically stimulating the hypothalamo-hypophysial region through indwelling electrodes in alert unanaesthetized rabbits 10,29,30. He applied these methods to studies of both the anterior and posterior pituitary, and with his collaborators, Harris was able to activate the hypophysis or the pituitary gland, and record a myriad of responses including water balance, oestrous and ovulation, milk ejection, stress and gastric motility 3137. It is clear in his discussion section of these empirical studies, that he was always open-minded about the mechanisms that might mediate these responses. Even in the earliest work, he carefully considered a number of options on how the anterior and posterior pituitary are regulated by the hypothalamus For example, in 1937 he opined several possibilities 10.

“That impulses pass along sympathetic fibres in the superior cervical ganglion and carotid plexus…. the sympathetic system plays some part in this mechanism, but presumably not a very large part.” 2) “… That there are sympathetic fibres from the central nervous system which supply the pituitary gland… There appears to be no experimental evidence put forward for or against this theory.” 3) “there occurs a humoral or nervous transmission of stimuli from the posterior to the anterior pituitary…. The evidence for this has been mainly of a negative character.”

Almost a decade later, Harris was still mulling the problem and suggested that there might be a vascular pathway between the hypothalamus and anterior lobe of the pituitary gland Harris 38.

“It is possible that hypothalamic nerve fibres, ending on the upper set of capillaries in the median eminence, liberate some chemo-transmitter into the portal vessels which is carried humorally to the anterior pituitary and thereby controls or modifies the activity of this gland. Since this mode of control would involve a nervous and vascular link, it has been referred to as “neurovascular” control of the anterior pituitary.”

The role of vascular signals:

An important line of Harris’s research involved the difficult task of determining the contribution of the portal vasculature to the functions he studied. To do this, he cut the blood vessels of the pituitary stalk. He showed that after severance of the pituitary stalk, the function of the anterior pituitary gland could be correlated with the degree of its revascularisation by the hypophysial portal vessels 39 regeneration in rat 40, and monkey 41. He also showed that initial loss of function of several different pituitary responses could be restored following pituitary stalk transection, possibly due to this revascularization mechanism 4244.

Transplant studies.

Another direction that addressed vascularization involved the study of pituitary transplants. In this work he showed that the morphological and functional integrity of pituitary grafts were maintained when these grafts were vascularised by the hypophysial portal but not by the systemic circulation 45,46. As an example of his thorough approach, four strategies were tried in one such experiment: (1) Hypophysectomy and transplantation of anterior lobe - tissue under the median eminence. (2) Hypophysectomy and transplantation of the extirpated anterior lobe into the emptied hypophysial capsule. (3) Extirpation of the anterior pole of the hypophysis. (4) Section of the hypophysial stalk 39.

The direction of blood flow:

While the foregoing work was suggestive, direct evidence on whether the flow of information was from brain to pituitary or vice versa, was much more difficult to establish and remained controversial for decades 47. To start, Popa and Fielding had suggested that blood flowed upwards, from the pituitary gland to the hypothalamus, asserting …That the blood flows in these vessels in the direction stated [from pituitary to hypothalamus] is evident from their colloid accompaniment.” Harris and Green however, demonstrated definitively that the direction of blood flow in the portal vessels of living rats was from the hypothalamus to the pituitary 48 as had already been shown in Bufo arenarum and Rana catesbiana Houssay, Biasotti & Sammartino 49 and Green 50. It remained to be demonstrated that chemical substances of neural origin actually flowed within these vessels. Of course, the identity of the neurosecretions in this system was established by the 1977 Nobel prize winning work of Guillemin and Schally. Not surprisingly, Harris too pursued these questions 51. In summary, as documented in a lovely review by AG Watts 19, the experimental work of Harris and his colleagues has stood the test of time. This is evident in a steady increase in the resolution and identification of mechanisms demonstrating the hypothalamic loci of neurosecretory neurons, the identity of neurosecretions of the hypothalamus and their relationships to the pituitary secretions.

Literature Reviews:

In addition to performing many multifaceted empirical studies, Harris published a steady stream of reviews. Over the years, he fine-tuned his understanding of the portal system and steadily documented his developing ideas 5257. Harris’s 1955 book was the culmination of his careful analysis and his ability to integrate myriad studies and ideas – both his own and those of others. Harris’s vision in this book was based on a careful, critical summary of the literature demonstrating a vascular portal pathway from the hypothalamus to the pituitary. The book was very well received, as can be seen in a review by Mary Pickford 58.

“The subject has an enormous literature, and Professor Harris has done well to compress his account into less than 300 pages. He has achieved this partly by cutting down the list of references to the more important ones, and partly by presenting the point of view which seems to him most likely to be found true in the light of later work. Though some people here and there may disagree with his opinions, this method of presentation is far more stimulating than an undiscriminating summary of all the literature.”

Retrospectively, Harris is generally credited with founding the field of Neuroendocrinology. In Harris’s lifetime however, the situation was more fraught, as documented by Semour Reichlin 16. Harris was criticized for years by Sir Solly Zuckerman, a prestigious Professor of Anatomy at the University of Birmingham. Zuckerman dismissed Harris’ theory about the role of the pituitary portal vessels in anterior pituitary regulation 18,59. Zuckerman’s experiments appeared to show that female ferrets bearing a cut pituitary stalk came into heat in the absence of portal vessel connections, as shown by Indian ink vascular perfusion 60. In the honest ways of science, Reichlin reports that Harris was permitted to examine the brains of these ferrets and found that the portal blood vessels had regenerated in these ferrets. Additionally, Donovan and Harris 42 repeated the study with somewhat improved methods and confirmed their own conclusions. Zuckerman was not convinced of Harris’s interpretation, and stubbornly retained his doubts for decades 18,61,62.

III. The SCN-OVLT connection: Identification of a second portal pathway in the brain

Almost 100 years after Popa and Fielding described the pituitary portal system, we discovered a second portal pathway in the mouse brain 2. A possible reason that the SCN-OVLT pathway was not seen in previous studies is that both structures lie in the midline and the connecting capillaries lie on the floor of the third ventricle. These connections tend to be damaged when preparing brain sections. We used brain clearing methods, immunochemistry and light sheet microscopy, enabling 3D reconstruction of the area. Figure 3 shows the images one can glean from the classical methods compared to those possible today.

Figure 3. One portal pathway links median eminence to pituitary gland another links the SCN to the OVLT.

Figure 3

The image on the left shows the hematoxylin and eosin stain. From “Hypophysio-portal vessels and their colloid accompaniment.” by Popa and Fielding, 1933, Journal of anatomy, 67, pt.2, p.227. © 2022 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. The image on the right shows an iDisco cleared mouse brain stained with AVP (to identify SCN) and collagen to label blood vessels 2. The point being made is that today’s tools permit not only a finer depiction of these blood vessels but also more certainty about their anatomical features. Abbreviations: AVP=arginine vasopressin; LE=left; OVLT=organum vasculosum of the lamina terminalis; R=rostral; SCN=suprachiasmatic nucleus. Scale bar=100μm.

Anatomical evidence constitutes necessary infrastructure or discovery research in exploring brain function. The demonstration of a link between the capillary vessels of the brain’s clock in the SCN and those of a circumventricular organ (CVO), the organum vasculosum of the lamina terminalis (OVLT) is a first step in the exploration of this communication pathway. The SCN is a hypothalamic nucleus known as the brain’s circadian clock: It is found in all vertebrates that have been studied 63. The OVLT is a sensory CVO, having fenestrated blood vessels and best known for its role in regulating thirst and water balance, among other functions 6466. The local connections between blood vessels of the SCN-OVLT, like those of the pituitary portal pathway, enable small amounts of neurosecretions to reach their specialized targets in high concentrations without dilution in the general circulatory system. While the anatomical work reported to date did not establish the direction of blood flow, we conjectured that it goes from the SCN to the OVLT based on a host of prior studies based on our substantial knowledge of the SCN 2 (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Detailed sagittal view of SCN-OVLT portal vessels. The SCN labelled by AVP and OVLT delineated by its characteristic loopy blood vessels (see text). Abbreviations as in Figure 1. Scale bar=150μm.

The establishment of a significant function of the SCN-OVLT portal systems in the brain is likely to be challenged, as was the work of Harris. Hopefully, the road will not involve the personally directed hostility faced by Harris. That said, there is no question that the pituitary portal system is not the only one in the brain. The long series of studies required to prove significant functions of the SCN-OVLT portal connections has just begun and the major landmarks in our understanding are parallel to those of Harris (Table 2). In the case of the pituitary portal system, it took from 1930-1955 to achieve reasonable consensus on the importance of this communication pathway, and another two decades to begin to identify the chemical secretions carried in this system. In the case of the SCN-OVLT, newer tools enable more definitive studies and hopefully, faster progress.

Table 2.

Parallel trajectories in Studies of pituitary and SCN-OVLT portal pathways

Pituitary portal system SCN-OVLT portal system
• 1930: Anatomy – rat portal system • 2021: Anatomy – mouse portal system1
• 1952: Transplants of the pituitary • 1987-1996: Transplants of the suprachiasmatic nucleus2,3
• 1930-1955: Direction of blood flow • 2022: Direction of blood flow (current work)
• 1972: Identification of “chemical neurosecretions” releasing hormones • 2022: Hypothesis: Identification of “chemical neurosecretion” as AVP from SCN

SCN transplants provide evidence of a humoral output signal:

The SCN was first identified as a master circadian clock in the brain in the early 1970’s 67, 68, and that initial work has been supported by empirical and modeling research in the following decades (reviewed in6973). Much work in many different labs indicated that transplants of the SCN tissue into an SCN ablated host restored circadian rhythms (reviewed in7477). However, several years of experimental work failed to reveal a necessary neural connection between the donor tissue and host brain 7881. Direct evidence that the SCN produces a diffusible signal is based on transplant studies in which the nucleus was encapsulated in a copolymer membrane and placed in the third ventricle of an animal whose own SCN had been ablated 82. The encapsulated graft permitted the diffusion of molecules but eliminated the possibility of fibre outgrowth. In this study, the grafted tissue was taken from donor wild-type hamsters that had a typical free-running period of 24 hours and implanted into mutant hamsters hosts that had a (on average) free-running period of ~20 hours83. The recovered period was that of the donor tissue. This experiment provided definitive proof that a humoral signal could support circadian rhythms of locomotor activity (Figure 5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

The work depicted in this figure proves that a humoral signal from the SCN can sustain circadian locomotor rhythms. The left panel shows an actogram of an intact mutant animal with a ~21.4-hour free-running locomotor rhythm, after it received an SCN lesion, and following implantation of an encapsulated SCN from a wild-type donor animal with a ~24-hour endogenous rhythm. The fourier analysis shows the quantification of the free-running behavior. The right panel shows the encapsulated grafted SCN tissue. From “A diffusible coupling signal from the transplanted suprachiasmatic nucleus controlling circadian locomotor rhythms.” By Silver et al., 1996, Nature, 382(6594), p.810-813. © 2022 Springer Nature.

Functions restored by humoral signals:

Importantly, transplants of the SCN restore behavioral rhythmicity such as locomotor, drinking and gnawing rhythms, but do not restore endocrine rhythms 84. A number of diffusible signals have been implicated as output signals of the SCN (reviewed in8587). It remains to be determined which of these chemical messengers travel via the portal system to modulate the responses supported by SCN transplants. Once identified, it will be necessary to document the role played by the portal system. While the identity of the chemical messenger that might travel in the SCN-OVLT portal pathway is unknown, it is important nevertheless to ask what part of this complex CVO can receive this input.

Characteristics of CVO’s.

Circumventricular organs (CVOs) are a group of vascularized regions protruding into the ventricles. Although little is known about the developmental and evolutionary origins of the CVOs, they are divided into two categories, namely secretory or sensory 88. The secretory CVOs include the median eminence, neurohypophysis, pineal gland, and subcomissural organ. The sensory CVOs include the OVLT, subfornical organ and area postrema. The vasculature of the CVOs (except the subcomissural organ) is characterized by fenestrated capillaries and large perivascular spaces 89,90. Because they provide access to the interstitial spaces of the brain, CVO’s have been characterized as “windows to the brain” 91. We hypothesize that humoral signals from the SCN course along portal capillaries to the leaky vessels of the OVLT. From here such signals can reach the CSF and interstitial spaces deep within the brain.

OVLT boundaries:

The OVLT is located near the ventral aspect of the anterior wall of the 3rd ventricle. Several methods have been used to delineate its borders, with similar findings among authors using a variety of different methods 9294. As noted below95, because the fenestrated capillaries of the OVLT allow the passage of the tracers into its interstitium, the nuclear boundaries can be determined by the localization of Evans Blue tracer following intravenous injection.

“…the OVLT is a complex three-dimensional structure. In coronal view, the rostral OVLT is shaped like an inverted heart bordered dorsally by the vertical limbs of the nucleus of the diagonal band of Broca. The ventral surface of the rostral OVLT lies directly above the prechiasmatic cistern that houses the preoptic vascular plexus. The caudal portion of the OVLT is vertically elongated and bordered ventrally by the optic chiasma and dorsally by the median preoptic nucleus. The caudal pole of the OVLT interfaces with the ventral part of the third ventricle, including the small optic recess located directly above the optic chiasma.”

The OVLT is a heterogeneous CVO:

A thourough overview of the OVLT is available in edited book96. These authors divide the nucleus into three subregions, namely a rostromedial, a laterocaudal and a dorsal region. The first two regions are based on features of the vasculature, while the dorsal cap covering the top the OVLT is characterized by its functional aspects. In the rostromedial region, there is a superficial capillary plexus, large perivascular spaces and neurosecretory terminals. The laterocaudal region includes a deep capillary plexus formed by a few branches exiting the superficial capillary plexus. Distinct afferent and efferent connections of the OVLT subregions have been described in 97 (see their Table 4) and in 98. The dorsal cap is highly responsive to hypertonicity. The understanding of the OVLT anatomy has been greatly expanded by depicting the interdigitation of glial elements including tanycytes, ependymocytes, and astrocytes between local neuron populations95. The subdivisions of OVLT and localization of capillary plexi is shown in Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

The diagram depicts the three compartments of the OVLT in sagittal view. The blood supply to the OVLT derives from the anterior communicating artery (ACoA) and enters the nucleus near the superficial plexus while the portal vessels reach the OVLT at its base. Abbreviations: 3V=third ventricle; ACoA=anterior communicating artery; DC=dorsal cap; LC=laterocaudal region; Och=optic chiasm; OR=optic recess; PCC=prechiasmatic cistern; RM=rostromedial region.

Characterization of capillary plexi: The SCN-OVLT portal vessels connect to the OVLT at its base, but we do not yet know the targets of any blood-borne products.

There are two major vascular plexi in the OVLT; the superficial plexus in the rostromedial region (also called the primary plexus) and the deep plexus (also called the secondary plexus) in the laterocaudal region, each bearing several distinct features. The density of the blood vessels is different. The superficial plexus has significantly higher density and more intertwined structure than the deep one. They also differ in the size of their perivascular spaces, with large perivascular spaces around the superficial capillary plexus, but not the secondary plexus 90. Finally, the capillary plexi differ in their permeability to tracers; larger tracers, such as dextran 10k, are confined to the perivascular space around the superficial plexus while smaller tracers, such as FITC or dextran 3k, can penetrate the deep plexus into the subependymal region 99.

Portal vessel-OVLT:

It remains to be established whether the portal vessels from the SCN connect to the superficial plexus or deep plexus. The ventral border of the deep capillary protrudes into the optic recess of the 3rd ventricle whereas the ventral-most part of the superficial plexus enters the floor of the 3rd ventricle below the optic recess. Portal vessels from the SCN travel along the 3rd ventricle floor before joining the OVLT capillaries. Thus, localization of the superficial plexus renders it more accessible to the portal vessels. A noticeable feature of the ventral part the superficial plexus is a large number of fibers co-expressing the GFAP and vimentin 95. These fibers suggest that the entry point of portal vessels into the OVLT may have abundant tanycyte terminals.

IV. Defining features of neurovascular portal systems

To the best of our knowledge there is but one additional mention of a portal pathway in the brain100 in their description of the microcirculation of the area postrema. They note that “…enlarged capillary channels are re-entrant” at the borders of the area postrema where they are joined by short interconnecting vessels to capillaries of smaller caliber typical of the medullary tissue. The authors suggest that this may be a portal system because two distinctive, serially connected capillary beds are interposed between artery and vein (Figure 7). If a portal system is defined as

Figure 7.

Figure 7

The diagram depicts the flow of blood through a portal pathway and in the systemic and pulmonary circulatory systems.

“…a vascular arrangement in which blood from the capillaries of one organ is transported to the capillaries of anoth er organ by a connecting vein or veins, then by this definition, only the pituitary portal system and the SCN-OVLT portal systems meet the criterion, while the area postrema-medulla capillary beds do not. However, in a broader view, other categories of joined capillary beds can be considered. As noted by Roth and Yamamoto (1968), the Area Postrema and adjacent medullary capillary beds lack a connecting vessel but share capillary vessels fenestrated and non-fenestrated respectively. As such they do not meet the common definition of a portal system, yet the sharing of capillary beds provides a mechanism for neural secretions to reach specialized local targets”.

Immediately obvious is the fact that the three portal systems under discussion have both common and unique features. Common to all three systems is the idea that the shared vascular capillary beds provide a route for anatomically/morphologically distinct structures to share neurochemical secretions. That said, the pituitary portal system connects the leaky fenestrated capillaries of the median eminence and the pituitary gland. The SCN-OVLT portal pathway connects the non-fenestrated capillary vessels of the SCN to the fenestrated vessels of the OVLT. The area postrema and medulla capillary beds are joined directly and lack connecting capillary veins.

V. Future Directions:

As stated above, once the pituitary portal pathways had been anatomically identified, major challenges remained, and the same landmarks to discovery are needed to understand the SCN-OVLT system. These include (a) determination of direction of flow (b) the source(s) and target(s) of information transfer, (c) identification of the signals flowing in these pathways, and (d) determination of the specific function of those signals. While it took several decades to address these critical challenges for the hypothalamic-pituitary portal system, we anticipate that recent molecular, genetic and technological advances will hasten these answers in the case of the recently discovered SCN-OVLT portal system. Several precedents point to tools and available methods.

For the pituitary portal system, Green and Harris were able to visualize the blood vessels linking the median eminence of the hypothalamus and anterior pituitary as the portal vessels exit the bony base of the brain and are relatively long. We recently implemented an innovative experimental procedure 101 in which we combined two-photon imaging in an transgenic rats expressing an arginine vasopressin (AVP)-enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) fusion gene102 along with a transpharyngeal surgical procedure. This toolbox enabled us to expose and image the ventral hypothalamus, and study for the first time in vivo neurovascular responses and changes in blood flow in the hypothalamus, within the bony base of the brain. In this work, we were able to examine the microvasculature of the supraoptic nucleus (SON) in response to a systemic salt challenge 101. Using a modified version of this approach, we identified the SCN and its microvasculature (Figure 8, unpublished results from the lab), which will allow us to readily and rapidly determine directionality of blood flow within this system.

Figure 8. In vivo two-photon imaging of the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic (SCN) nucleus in the eGFP-VP anesthetized rat.

Figure 8

A, Schematic representation of the in vivo preparation used to visualize the SON and the SCN using a ventral approach. From “Inverse neurovascular coupling contributes to positive feedback excitation of vasopressin neurons during a systemic homeostatic challenge.” By Roy et al., 2021, Cell Reports, 37(5), p.109925. © 2022 Elsevier. B, In vivo two-photon imaging of vasopressin eGFP fluorescence in the supraoptic (SON) and suprachiasmatic (SCN) nuclei. Note the large magnocellular neurons in the SON compared to the SCN (unpublished data). C, Schematic representation of the brain region imaged in B.

The advent of novel biosensors for the detection of a variety of neuropeptides constitutes also a promising venue for the identification of signals traveling within brain portal systems, including the SCN-OVLT. For example, we and others have used biosensor “sniffer” cells to detect with extremely high sensitivity and specificity in real time, endogenously-released vasopressin and oxytocin within the SON and SCN 103,104.

More recently, biosensors have been genetically expressed and used in conjunction with viral gene delivery. They can also be efficiently employed to monitor the endogenous release in real time of a variety of neurotransmitters within the PVN 105,106. Thus, biosensors have high sensitivity and specificity, along with the ability to deliver them in a region-specific and even cell type-specific manner. They stand as efficient candidates to identify and measure signals being released and traveling within the SCN-OVLT portal system, without the need of using a large number of animals, as was needed in the past to identify and measure signals traveling in the hypothalamic-pituitary portal. As previously noted107 …”A major boost to Schally’s efforts came from the meat-packer Oscar Mayer and Company, which donated a million pig hypothalamic.”

VI. The long view:

We anticipate that as these highly sensitive anatomical, molecular and functional approaches become more readily accessible to the neuroscientific community, other brain portal systems will be unveiled. Thus, rather than being considered a singularity, brain vascular portal systems may be recognized as functionally essential alternative pathways for transfer of signals and information processing within the brain, having once again, as decades ago, an important impact field of Neuroendocrinology.

Acknowledgements:

The authors thank Sophia Grace Piperata for helping with preparing the figures and tables. Figures were created with biorender.com, Adobe Photoshop, and Adobe Illustrator. Work from our labs described herein was supported by National Science Foundation (NSF) grant 1749500 (to RS), National Institutes of Health (NIH) HLBI R01HL162575 (to JES). Light sheet microscopy was performed with support from the Zuckerman Institute’s Cellular Imaging Platform and the National Institutes of Health (NIH 1S10OD023587-01).

References

  • 1.Popa GT, Fielding U. Hypophysio-Portal Vessels and their Colloid Accompaniment. J Anat. 1933;67(Pt 2):227–232.1. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Yao Y, Taub AB, LeSauter J, Silver R. Identification of the suprachiasmatic nucleus venous portal system in the mammalian brain. Nat Commun. Sep 24 2021;12(1):5643. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25793-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Blinder P, Tsai PS, Kaufhold JP, Knutsen PM, Suhl H, Kleinfeld D. The cortical angiome: an interconnected vascular network with noncolumnar patterns of blood flow. Nat Neurosci. Jul 2013;16(7):889–U150. doi: 10.1038/nn.3426 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Popa G A Portal Circulation from the Pituitary to the Hypothalamic Region. J Anat. Oct 1930;65(Pt 1):88–91. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Harris GW Neural control of the pituitary gland. E. Arnold; 1955. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yao Y, Silver R. Mutual Shaping of Circadian Body-Wide Synchronization by the Suprachiasmatic Nucleus and Circulating Steroids. Front Behav Neurosci. 2022;16:877256. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.877256 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Silver R, Kriegsfeld LJ. Circadian rhythms have broad implications for understanding brain and behavior. Eur J Neurosci. Jun 2014;39(11):1866–80. doi: 10.1111/ejn.12593 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fishbein AB, Knutson KL, Zee PC. Circadian disruption and human health. J Clin Invest. Oct 1 2021;131(19)doi: 10.1172/JCI148286 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lee Y, Field JM, Sehgal A. Circadian Rhythms, Disease and Chronotherapy. J Biol Rhythms. Dec 2021;36(6):503–531. doi: 10.1177/07487304211044301 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Harris GW The induction of ovulation in the rabbit, by electrical stimulation of the hypothalamohypophysial mechanism. Proc R Soc Ser B-Bio. May 1937;122(828):374–394. doi:DOI 10.1098/rspb.1937.0031 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Donovan BT. Geoffrey W. Harris, 1913-1971. Neuroendocrinology. 1972;10(2):65–70. doi: 10.1159/000122079 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fink G 60 YEARS OF NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY: MEMOIR: Harris’ neuroendocrine revolution: of portal vessels and self-priming. J Endocrinol. Aug 2015;226(2):T13–24. doi: 10.1530/joe-15-0130 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Leng G, Pineda R, Sabatier N, Ludwig M. 60 YEARS OF NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY: The posterior pituitary, from Geoffrey Harris to our present understanding. Journal of Endocrinology. 01 Aug. 2015. 2015;226(2):T173–T185. doi: 10.1530/joe-15-0087 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Raisman G An urge to explain the incomprehensible: Geoffrey Harris and the discovery of the neural control of the pituitary gland. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1997;20:533–66. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.20.1.533 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Raisman G 60 YEARS OF NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY: MEMOIR: Geoffrey Harris and my brush with his unit. J Endocrinol. Aug 2015;226(2):T1–T11. doi: 10.1530/JOE-15-0049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Reichlin S 60 YEARS OF NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY: MEMOIR: working in the ‘Huts’ with the professor: the first Maudsley years. J Endocrinol. Aug 2015;226(2):E7–E11. doi: 10.1530/JOE-15-0034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sawin CT. Henry H. Dale (1875-1968) and early endocrinology. Endocrinologist. Nov-Dec 1998;8(6):395–400. doi:Doi 10.1097/00019616-199811000-00001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wade N Nobel duel : two scientist’s 21 year race to win the world’s most coverted research prize. Anchor Pr : Doubleday; 1981. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Watts AG 60 YEARS OF NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY: The structure of the neuroendocrine hypothalamus: the neuroanatomical legacy of Geoffrey Harris. J Endocrinol. Aug 2015;226(2):T25–39. doi: 10.1530/JOE-15-0157 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Silver R, Rosenblatt JS. The development of a developmentalist: Daniel S. Lehrman. Dev Psychobiol. Nov 1987;20(6):563–70. doi: 10.1002/dev.420200602 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Coen CW Celebrating the brain’s other output-input system and the monograph that defined neuroendocrinology. Journal of Endocrinology. Aug 2015;226(2):E3–E6. doi: 10.1530/Joe-15-0251 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Harris GW The blood vessels of the rabbit’s pituitary gland, and the significance of the pars and zona tuberalis. J Anat. Oct 1947;81(Pt 4):343–51. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Harris GW Hypothalamo-hypophysial connexions in the Cetacea. J Physiol. Oct 16 1950;111(3-4):361–7. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1950.sp004485 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Harris GW The hypophysial portal vessels of the porpoise (Phocaena phocaena). Nature. Jun 28 1947;159(4052):874. doi: 10.1038/159874a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Green JD, Harris GW. The neurovascular link between the neurohypophysis and adenohypophysis. J Endocrinol. Jul 1947;5(3):136–46. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.0050136 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Harris GW The induction of pseudo-pregnancy in the rat by electrical stimulation through the head. J Physiol. Dec 11 1936;88(3):361–7. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1936.sp003446 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Friedgood H Studies on the sympathetic nervous control of the anterior hypophysis with special reference to a neuro-humoral mechanism. Symposium on Endocrine Glands; Harvard Tercentenary Celebrations. In: Williams R, ed. Textbook of Endocrinology. Saunders; 1936:635–698:chap 10. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hinsey J The relation of the nervous system to ovulation and other phenomena of the female reproductive tract. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology. 1937;5:269–279. doi:doi: 10.1101/SQB.1937.005.01.027 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Harris GW A Technique for Operations on the Hypothalamo-Hypophysial Region of the Rabbit. J Anat. Jan 1938;72(Pt 2):226–33. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Harris GW Electrical stimulation of the hypothalamus and the mechanism of neural control of the adenohypophysis. J Physiol. Sep 30 1948;107(4):418–29. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1948.sp004286 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Harris GW The excretion of an antidiuretic substance by the kidney, after electrical stimulation of the neurohypophysis in the unanaesthetized rabbit. J Physiol. Sep 30 1948;107(4):430–5. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1948.sp004287 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Harris GW Pituitary stalk in relation to oestrous rhythm and pseudo-pregnancy in rats. J Physiol. Aug 1949;109(1-2):Proc, 21. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Harris GW The relationship of the nervous system to the neurohypophysis and the adenohypophysis. J Endocrinol. Oct 1949;6(2):Suppl, xvii–xix. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Cross BA, Harris GW. Milk ejection following electrical stimulation of the pituitary stalk in rabbits. Nature. Dec 9 1950;166(4232):994–5. doi: 10.1038/166994b0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.De Groot J, Harris GW. Hypothalmic control of the anterior pituitary gland and blood lymphocytes. J Physiol. Oct 16 1950;111(3-4):335–46. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1950.sp004483 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Cross BA, Harris GW. The role of the neurohypophysis in the milk-ejection reflex. J Endocrinol. Apr 1952;8(2):148–61. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.0080148 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Harris GW Further evidence regarding the endocrine status of the neurohypophysis. J Physiol. Sep 30 1948;107(4):436–48. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1948.sp004288 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Harris GW The hypothalamus and water metabolism. Proc R Soc Med. Oct 1948;41(10):661–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Harris GW, Jacobsohn D. Proliferative capacity of the hypophysial portal vessels. Nature. May 27 1950;165(4204):854. doi: 10.1038/165854a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Harris GW Regeneration of the hypophysial portal vessels. Nature. Jan 15 1948;162(4133):70. doi: 10.1038/163070a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Harris GW, Johnson RT. Regeneration of the hypophysial portal vessels, after section of the hypophysial stalk, in the monkey (Macacus rhesus). Nature. May 20 1950;165(4203):819–20. doi: 10.1038/165819b0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Donovan BT, Harris GW. Effect of pituitary stalk section light-induced oestrus in the ferret. Nature. Sep 11 1954;174(4428):503–4. doi: 10.1038/174503a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Donovan BT, Harris GW. The effect of pituitary stalk section on light-induced oestrus in the ferret. J Physiol. Jan 27 1956;131(1):102–14. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1956.sp005447 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Fortier C, Harris GW, McDonald IR. The effect of pituitary stalk section on the adrenocortical response to stress in the rabbit. J Physiol. Apr 30 1957;136(2):344–63. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1957.sp005765 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Harris GW, Jacobsohn D. Functional grafts of the anterior pituitary gland. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. Feb 28 1952;139(895):263–76. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1952.0011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Harris GW, Jacobsohn D. Functional grafts of the anterior pituitary gland. J Physiol. May 1951;113(4):35p–6p. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Coen CW 60 YEARS OF NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY: Celebrating the brain’s other output-input system and the monograph that defined neuroendocrinology. J Endocrinol. Aug 2015;226(2):E3–6. doi: 10.1530/JOE-15-0251 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Green JD, Harris GW. Observation of the hypophysioportal vessels of the living rat. J Physiol. May 15 1949;108(3):359–61. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Houssay BA, Biasotti ARS CR Soc Biol, Paris. 1935:120, 725. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Green JD Anat Rec. 1947:99, 21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Harris GW, Ruf KB. Luteinizing hormone releasing factor in rat hypophysial portal blood collected during electrical stimulation of the hypothalamus. J Physiol. May 1970;208(1):243–50. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Harris GW Neural control of the pituitary gland. I. The neurohypophysis. Br Med J. Sep 8 1951;2(4731):559–64. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.4731.559 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Harris GW Neural control of the pituitary gland. II. The adenohypophysis, with special reference to the secretion of A.C.T.H. Br Med J. Sep 15 1951;2(4732):627–34. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.4732.627 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Harris GW The hypothalamus and endocrine glands. Br Med Bull. 1950;6(4):345–50. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a073628 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Harris GW The physiology of the hypothalamus and pituitary gland in relationship to gynaecology. Arch Gynakol. 1953;183:35–48. doi: 10.1007/BF01004841 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Harris GW Pituitary-hypothalamic mechanisms. AMA Arch Neurol Psychiatry. Feb 1955;73(2):124–6. doi: 10.1001/archneurpsyc.1955.02330080002002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Harris GW The function of the pituitary stalk. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp. Nov 1955;97(5):358–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Pickford M NEURAL CONTROL OF THE PITUITARY GLAND. By G. W. Harris F.R.S. Sc.D. M.D., Fitzmary Professor of Physiology, Institute of Psychiatry, Maudsley Hospital. Edward Arnold (Publishers) Ltd. 1955. Pp. 298. 30s. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Physiology and Cognate Medical Sciences. 1956;41(3):355–356. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.1956.sp001199 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Leng G. The endocrinology of the brain. Endocr Connect. Dec 1 2018;7(12):R275–R285. doi: 10.1530/EC-18-0367 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Thomson AP, Zuckerman S. Functional relations of the adenohypophysis and hypothalamus. Nature. May 30 1953;171(4361):970. doi: 10.1038/171970a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Zuckerman S. The possible functional significance of the pituitary portal vessels. Ciba Foundation Colloquia on Endocrinology 1955;8:551–558. doi:doi: 10.1002/9780470715215.ch15 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Zuckerman S A skeptical neuroendocrinologist. In Pioneers in Neuroendocrinology II. 1978:403–411. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Cassone VM, Speh JC, Card JP, Moore RY. Comparative anatomy of the mammalian hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nucleus. J Biol Rhythms. Spring 1988;3(1):71–91. doi: 10.1177/074873048800300106 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Gizowski C, Bourque CW. The neural basis of homeostatic and anticipatory thirst. Nat Rev Nephrol. Jan 2018;14(1):11–25. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2017.149 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Fry WM, Ferguson AV. The subfornical organ and organum vasculosum of the lamina terminalis: Critical roles in cardiovascular regulation and the control of fluid balance. Handb Clin Neurol. 2021;180:203–215. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-820107-7.00013-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.McKinley MJ, Pennington GL, Ryan PJ. The median preoptic nucleus: A major regulator of fluid, temperature, sleep, and cardiovascular homeostasis. Handb Clin Neurol. 2021;179:435–454. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-819975-6.00028-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Moore RY, Eichler VB. Loss of a circadian adrenal corticosterone rhythm following suprachiasmatic lesions in the rat. Brain Research. 1972/07/13/ 1972;42(1):201–206. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(72)90054-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Stephan FK, Zucker I. Circadian rhythms in drinking behavior and locomotor activity of rats are eliminated by hypothalamic lesions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Jun 1972;69(6):1583–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.6.1583 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Silver R, Moore RY. The suprachiasmatic nucleus and circadian function: an introduction. Chronobiol Int. Sep 1998;15(5):vii–x. doi: 10.3109/07420529808998698 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Weaver DR. The suprachiasmatic nucleus: a 25-year retrospective. J Biol Rhythms. Apr 1998;13(2):100–12. doi: 10.1177/074873098128999952 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Patton AP, Hastings MH. The suprachiasmatic nucleus. Curr Biol. Aug 6 2018;28(15):R816–R822. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.06.052 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Pauls SD, Honma KI, Honma S, Silver R. Deconstructing Circadian Rhythmicity with Models and Manipulations. Trends Neurosci. Jun 2016;39(6):405–419. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2016.03.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Finger AM, Kramer A. Mammalian circadian systems: Organization and modern life challenges. Acta Physiol (Oxf). Mar 2021;231(3):e13548. doi: 10.UU/apha.13548 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Boer GJ, van Esseveldt LE, Rietveld WJ. Cellular Requirements of Suprachiasmatic Nucleus Transplants for Restoration of Orcadian Rhythm. Chronobiology International. 1998/01/01 1998;15(5):551–566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.van Esseveldt LE, Lehman MN, Boer GJ. The suprachiasmatic nucleus and the circadian time-keeping system revisited. Brain Research Reviews. 2000/08/01/ 2000;33(1):34–77. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0173(00)00025-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Sollars PJ, Pickard GE. Restoration of Orcadian Behavior by Anterior Hypothalamic Grafts Containing the Suprachiasmatic Nucleus: Graft/Host Interconnections. Chronobiology International. 1998/01/01 1998;15(5):513–533. doi: 10.3109/07420529808998705 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Boer GJ, Griffioen HA. Developmental and functional aspects of grafting of the suprachiasmatic nucleus in the Brattleboro and the arrhythmic rat. Eur J Morphol. 1990;28(2-4):330–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Canbeyli RS, Lehman M, Silver R. Tracing SCN graft efferents with Dil. Brain Res. Jul 19 1991;554(1-2):15–21. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(91)90166-s [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Lehman MN, LeSauter J, Kim C, Berriman SJ, Tresco PA, Silver R. How do fetal grafts of the suprachiasmatic nucleus communicate with the host brain? Cell Transplant. Jan-Feb 1995;4(1):75–81. doi: 10.1177/096368979500400111 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Lehman MN, Lesauter J, Silver R. Fiber outgrowth from anterior hypothalamic and cortical xenografts in the third ventricle. J Comp Neurol. Feb 2 1998;391(1):133–45. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(19980202)391:1<133::aid-cne11>3.0.co;2-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Nelms JL, LeSauter J, Silver R, Lehman MN. Biotinylated dextran amine as a marker for fetal hypothalamic homografts and their efferents. Exp Neurol. Mar 2002;174(1):72–80. doi: 10.1006/exnr.2001.7848 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Silver R, LeSauter J, Tresco PA, Lehman MN. A diffusible coupling signal from the transplanted suprachiasmatic nucleus controlling circadian locomotor rhythms. Nature. Aug 29 1996;382(6594):810–3. doi: 10.1038/382810a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Ralph MR, Menaker M. A Mutation of the Circadian System in Golden Hamsters. Science. 1988;241(4870):1225–1227. doi: 10.1126/science.3413487 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Meyer-Bernstein EL, Jetton AE, Matsumoto SI, Markuns JF, Lehman MN, Bittman EL. Effects of suprachiasmatic transplants on circadian rhythms of neuroendocrine function in golden hamsters. Endocrinology. Jan 1999;140(1):207–18. doi: 10.1210/endo.140.1.6428 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.LeSauter J, Silver R. Output signals of the SCN. Chronobiol Int. Sep 1998;15(5):535–50. doi: 10.3109/07420529808998706 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Li JD, Hu WP, Zhou QY. The circadian output signals from the suprachiasmatic nuclei. Prog Brain Res. 2012;199:119–127. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-59427-3.00028-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Buijs RM, Hurtado-Alvarado G, Soto-Tinoco E. Vasopressin: An output signal from the suprachiasmatic nucleus to prepare physiology and behaviour for the resting phase. J Neuroendocrinol. Jul 2021;33(7):e12998. doi: 10.1111/jne.12998 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Kiecker C. The origins of the circumventricular organs. J Anat. Apr 2018;232(4):540–553. doi: 10.1111/joa.12771 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Oldfield BJ, McKinley MJ. Chapter 15 - Circumventricular Organs. In: Paxinos G, ed. The Rat Nervous System (Fourth Edition). Academic Press; 2015:315–333. [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Yamaguchi K, Morimoto A, Murakami N. Organum vasculosum laminae terminalis (OVLT) in rabbit and rat: topographic studies. J Comp Neurol. Apr 15 1993;330(3):352–62. doi: 10.1002/cne.903300306 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Gross PM, Weindl A. Peering through the windows of the brain. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. Dec 1987;7(6):663–72. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.1987.120 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Weindl A Neuroendocrine aspects of circumventricular organs Frontiers of Neuroendocrinology. Oxford University Press; 1973:3–32:chap 1. [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Krisch B, Leonhardt H, Buchheim W. The functional and structural border between the CSF- and blood-milieu in the circumventricular organs (organum vasculosum laminae terminalis, subfornical organ, area postrema) of the rat. Cell Tissue Res. Dec 29 1978;195(3):485–97. doi: 10.1007/BF00233891 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Mckinley MJ, Mcallen RM, Mendelsohn FAO, Allen AM, Chai SY, Oldfield BJ. Circumventricular Organs - Neuroendocrine Interfaces between the Brain and the Hemal Milieu. Front Neuroendocrin. Apr 1990;11(2):91–127. [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Prager-Khoutorsky M, Bourque CW. Anatomical organization of the rat organum vasculosum laminae terminalis. American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. 2015;309(4):R324–R337. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00134.2015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.McKinley MJ, McAllen RM, Davern P, et al. The sensory circumventricular organs of the mammalian brain. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol. 2003;172:III–XII, 1-122, back cover. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-55532-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.McKinley MJ, Clarke IJ, Oldfield BJ. Circumventricular organs. The Human Nervous System: Second Edition. Academic Press; 2003:562–591. [Google Scholar]
  • 98.McKinley MJ Circumventricular organs : Neuroendocrine interfaces between the brain and the hemal milieu. Front Neuroendocrinol. 1990. 1990;11:91–127. [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Morita S, Miyata S. Different vascular permeability between the sensory and secretory circumventricular organs of adult mouse brain. Cell and Tissue Research. Aug 2012;349(2):589–603. doi: 10.1007/s00441-012-1421-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Roth GI, Yamamoto WS. The microcirculation of the area postrema in the rat. 1968;133(3):329–340. doi: 10.1002/cne.901330304 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Roy RK, Althammer F, Seymour AJ, et al. Inverse neurovascular coupling contributes to positive feedback excitation of vasopressin neurons during a systemic homeostatic challenge. Cell Rep. Nov 2 2021;37(5):109925. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109925 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Ueta Y, Fujihara H, Serino R, et al. Transgenic expression of enhanced green fluorescent protein enables direct visualization for physiological studies of vasopressin neurons and isolated nerve terminals of the rat. Endocrinology. Jan 2005;146(1):406–13. doi: 10.1210/en.2004-0830 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Perkinson MR, Kirchner MK, Zhang M, Augustine RA, Stern JE, Brown CH. alpha-Melanocyte-stimulating hormone inhibition of oxytocin neurons switches to excitation in late pregnancy and lactation. Physiol Rep. Mar 2022;10(6):e15226. doi: 10.14814/phy2.15226 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Pitra S, Zhang M, Cauley E, Stern JE. NMDA receptors potentiate activity-dependent dendritic release of neuropeptides from hypothalamic neurons. J Physiol. Mar 2019;597(6):1735–1756. doi: 10.1113/JP277167 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Ino D, Tanaka Y, Hibino H, Nishiyama M. A fluorescent sensor for real-time measurement of extracellular oxytocin dynamics in the brain. Nat Methods. Oct 2022;19(10):1286–1294. doi: 10.1038/s41592-022-01597-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Sabatini BL, Tian L. Imaging Neurotransmitter and Neuromodulator Dynamics In Vivo with Genetically Encoded Indicators. Neuron. Oct 14 2020;108(1):17–32. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.09.036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Wade N. Guillemin and schally: the years in the wilderness. Science. Apr 21 1978;200(4339):279–82. doi: 10.1126/science.200.4339.279 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 1.Yao Y, Taub AB, LeSauter J, Silver R. Identification of the suprachiasmatic nucleus venous portal system in the mammalian brain. Nat Commun. Sep 24 2021;12(1):5643. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25793-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Silver R, LeSauter J, Tresco PA, Lehman MN. A diffusible coupling signal from the transplanted suprachiasmatic nucleus controlling circadian locomotor rhythms. Nature. Aug 29 1996;382(6594):810–3. doi: 10.1038/382810a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lehman M, Silver R, Gladstone W, Kahn R, Gibson M, Bittman E. Circadian rhythmicity restored by neural transplant. Immunocytochemical characterization of the graft and its integration with the host brain. 1987;7(6):1626–1638. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.07-06-01626.1987 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES