Abstract
Background:
Dicrocoelium dendriticum, a worldwide zoonotic trematode, is a common parasite of ruminant animals, but humans can be the definitive host by chance. We analyzed the world situation of the parasite from the perspective of the One Health concept by analyzing the research literature published from 1931 to 2022.
Methods:
Published documents related to D. dendriticum were searched from the Scopus database. Focusing on a visual analysis of the main research documents on D. dendriticum, Dimensions free web app was used to conduct co-occurrence analysis with keywords, countries, institutions, and authors. Moreover, key clustering research, affiliaitons, journals, countries, and authors were determined.
Results:
The Higher Council for Scientific Research (CSIC) was the most publishing affiliation on D. dendriticum with 19 articles. While the Veterinary Parasitology Journal was the mostly publishing journal on D. dendriticum with 38 articles, the most productive country was Iran. The authors Giuseppe Cringoli and Laura Rinaldi from Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Naples, Italy were the mostly publishing authors.
Conclusion:
This bibliometric analysis provides an overall description of the current state of D. dendriticum research and the initial exploration of future research directions. Our analysis provides guidance for the development of research on D. dendriticum.
Keywords: Bibliometrics, Dicrocoelium dendriticum, Scopus
Introduction
Dicrocoeliosis is a foodborne zoonotic disease caused by three Dicrocoelium species (D. dendriticum, D. hospes and D. chinensis) (1). D. dendriticum has been reported mostly in Europe, Asia, North Africa and North America (2).
D. dendriticum is a foodborne zoonotic helminth distributed in many places, especially in ruminant breeding areas (3, 4). The WHO listed D. dendriticum on the list of species that should be selected by its ‘Foodborne Disease Burden Epidemiology Reference Group’ in 2007. D. dendriticum, known as the small liver fluke or the lancet fluke, is an important species mainly in veterinary sciences, medicine and health sciences (5). Especially ruminants are the most known hosts of this trematode. Apart from the definitive host, ruminants, it has a life cycle of three hosts, including two invertebrate intermediate hosts (terrestrial snails as the first intermediate host and formicide ants as the second intermediate host) (6).
Although D. dendriticum infection is frequently seen in domestic ruminants, reports of dicroceliasis in humans have also been reported, and this disease has been classified as a neglected parasitic disease (7, 8). This disease can cause diarrhea, flatulence, biliary obstruction, cholangitis, acute urticaria, and cirrhosis, a serious liver problem (9, 10). However, reports of pseudo-dicroceliasis have also been reported with consumption of undercooked infected liver of animals (11).
We aimed to analyze the world situation of the parasite from the perspective of the One Health concept by analyzing the research literature published from 1931 to 2022.
Methods
Data collection
Bibliometrics is a comprehensive quantitative analysis tool based on research objectives (12,13). Here, we aimed to examine D. dendriticum research trends using a bibliometric analysis. Thus, the main content and relationship of the key clustering research, affiliaitons, journals, countries, and authors are determined. The Elsevier’s bibliometric database ‘Scopus database’ used to retrieve data. Our search terms were TITLE-ABS-KEY (dicrocoelium AND dendriticum) and (LIMIT-TO (DOCTYPE, “ar”)). Only research articles were included in this research, while letters, reviews, editorials, and other types of articles were excluded.
Data analysis
We used Scopus database’s graphs to make bibliometric analysis. Also Dimensions free web app (https://www.dimensions.ai/) used for the mappings. Scopus uses a variety of metrics to create a comparison chart for review. The Scopus Compare Sources tool provides a thumbnail for each metric type, each based on the selected chart type (Chart or Table).
Results
Analysis of documents
A total of 523 publications on D. dendriticum were identified. Our Scopus database search for research articles related to the D. dendriticum research from 1931 to 2022 yielded 473 articles. Documentation on D. dendriticum was stagnant from 1934 to 1947, then showed a plateau of output until 2017. Publication output increased significantly with the increasing number of publications (n = 30) from 1948 to 2017 (Fig. 1). The year of 2017 was the mostly published year with 27 articles. The number of documents published in a source is on the y-axis and the publication year is on the x-axis as shown in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1:
Documents by year
Affiliation distribution of documents
Affiliations with more than 10 articles on D. dendriticum are shown in Fig. 2. The Spanish National Research Council (CSIC) (Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas) was the most published affiliation on D. dendriticum with 19 articles
Fig. 2:
Affiliations with more than 10 articles on D. dendriticum
Journals
One hundred fifty-three journals published at least one publication on D. dendriticum. Veterinary Parasitology Journal was the mostly publishing journal on D. dendriticum with 38 articles (Fig. 3a). When we analyze the documents of the Veterinary Parasitology Journal regarding D. dendriticum publications, it is seen that the journal made the most publications on this subject in 2013 (Fig. 3b)
Fig. 3a:
Documents per year by journals on D. dendriticum
Fig. 3b:
Documents of Veterinary Parasitology Journal on D. dendriticum per year
Countries
Sixty-three countries subscribed to D. dendriticum research. In the analysis of D. dendriticum studies by country, the countries with the highest number of publications were Iran (n = 68), Spain (n = 59), Germany (n = 36), Switzerland (n = 36), Italy (n = 35) and Turkey (n = 30) (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4:
Mostly publishing countries on D. dendriticum
Authors and citations
One hundred and sixty-one authors have published articles on D. dendriticum. The three most cited authors are from Italy, Germany and Italy. The top 10 most cited authors are listed in Table 1. On the other hand, the authors Giuseppe Cringoli and Laura Rinaldi from Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Naples, Italy were the mostly publishing authors. We listed the top 10 most cited authors and journals published on D. dendriticum according to the total number of citations (Table 1). Most of the most cited journals were journals in the research field of parasitology. The average H index of the articles was 36, as shown in Fig. 5. When we analyzed the citation numbers of the top five most cited journals by year, they generally showed an increasing trend. However, the citation curves of Veterinary Parasitology and Parasitology Research were more prominent than the others (Fig. 6). Scopus' own statement says: the references are to the current year, but all documents published by the source (in Scopus) are taken into account regardless of their publication year. In the line chart, the number of citations of the source is on the y-axis and the year of publication is on the x-axis.
Table 1:
Citation analysis of authors and journals about D. dendriticum
Author | Journal | Reference number | Number of citations |
---|---|---|---|
Cringoli et al. | Veterinary Parasitology | 23 | 155 |
Becker et al. | Zeitschrift Für Parasitenkunde Parasitology Research | 24 | 137 |
Otranto et al. | Veterinary Parasitology | 25 | 111 |
Rojo-Vázquez et al. | Veterinary Parasitology | 26 | 93 |
Manga-González et al. | Parasitology | 27 | 87 |
Bernal et al. | Journal of Proteomics | 28 | 85 |
Rinaldi et al. | Parasitology Veterinary | 29 | 78 |
Zali et al. | Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases | 30 | 74 |
Pérez Cordón et al. | Veterinary Parasitology | 31 | 63 |
Cringoli et al. | Veterinary Parasitology | 32 | 59 |
Fig. 5:
Citation analysis of articles about D. dendriticum
Fig. 6:
Citations by years of the mostly publishing journals on D. dendriticum
Coauthorship analysis was performed using Dimension web free app to show the visualization network map of authors in D. dendriticum research. The link between authors is determined by the number of publications coauthored between them. The coauthorship analysis of authors indicates 6 clusters. These clusters are shown in Fig. 7 with different colors.
Fig. 7:
VOSviewer-screenshot figure coauthorship analysis with using Dimension web free app
The citation analysis between mostly publishing authors shows 7 clusters. These clusters are shown in different colors in Fig. 8.
Fig. 8:
VOSviewer-screenshot figure citation analysis between mostly publishing authors with using Dimension web free app
Discussion
This study identified the trend in D. dendriticum research all over the world by performing bibliometric analysis. Bibliometrics is a set of analysis methods used to measure literature and information in the process. This biblio-metric analysis also paved the way for future D. dendriticum research. Using citation metrics and visualization software, we also demonstrated collaborations among researchers around the world to knowledge generation on D. dendriticum. We did not find any bibliometric analysis to determine the current status on D. dendriticum. Therefore, this analysis will greatly guide future D. dendriticum research.
D. dendriticum has a worldwide distribution. It is thought to be endemic in probably thirty different countries. Some countries where the parasite has been reported; in the Middle East (Iran), Europe (Spain, Germany, Switzerland, Italy, Turkey), Asia (China, Vietnam and the Indo-Malayan region), Africa (Sierra Leone, Ghana, Nigeria and), North and South America and Australia (14–15). It is a common trematode reported from almost all regions of Iran, the most productive country in terms of number of publications in this study (16–17). Spain and Germany are the current top three global leaders in the D. dendriticum research.
There was a cumulative increase in publications over 91 years. This increase has been observed in parasitology research all over the world. Previous publications have also reported an increase in the number of publications on parasitology over the years (18, 19). The Spanish National Research Council (CSIC) was the most published affiliation on D. dendriticum with 19 articles. Founded in 1939, the institution still brings science closer to society through numerous projects, events and out-reach activities.
Journals are indispensable tools for announcing research to other researchers in the field all over the world. Therefore, the prestige of the journal is the performance of the published research in delivering it to other researchers in that field (20). When we examine the most cited journals on D. dendriticum, we see that the number of citations has changed over the years. This study accepts the view that the impact factor of article publications does not represent the quality of the articles and the number of citations can be variable (21, 22).
The authors of the most cited document, Cringoli et al., in their study published in 2004, evaluated the effect of the McMaster technique on the reliability of D. dendriticum egg numbers in the feces taken from naturally infected sheep and found that the flotation solution used in the study significantly affected the number of eggs per gram for D. dendriticum (23). The increase in the number of citations of the method used in the research over the years is also an indication that it has become widespread in diagnosis.
Coauthorship analysis, which is an indispensable element of bibliometric analysis, is used as an important indicator for research collaboration. A co-authoring network reflects collaboration between researchers and can provide opportunities for other researchers to collaborate; proper analysis of this network can offer opportunities for new collaboration outside of the existing network. Giuseppe and Cringoli were the most significant contributors to D. dendriticum research. Of the publications identified, 77 researchers were published worldwide on D. dendriticum research. Figure 7 shows that Spain is the center of an international coauthorship network and cooperates with many countries/regions. The green, blue and red coauthorship networks are mainly from European countries such as Spain, the United Kingdom, and Switzerland. The purple coauthorship networks are dominated by Germany and Turkey. Our results show that cooperation between countries has specific zonal properties. Reasons such as proximity to each other in terms of location, use of the same language, and animal transport between countries may be the criteria determining this cooperation. Another bibliometric analysis has reached a similar conclusion (24). Increasing cooperation between authors, institutions and countries will increase the number of authors and articles published in this field, and D. dendriticum will be combated more effectively.
Limitations
To our knowledge, our study is the first bibliometric analysis of publications on D. dendriticum. In this respect, this original study has some limitations. First, the data used for the analysis is from WOS only. Therefore, it is possible that publications found on other search engines but not on Scopus have been overlooked. We plan to revisit this topic by exploring ways to combine different data sources in the literature published in the future.
Conclusion
This bibliometric analysis summarizes scientific advances in D. dendriticum research and displays research frontiers and trends through network visualization. These findings can provide guidance for future research and perspectives in the rapidly evolving field of health sciences. We hope that this study, which comprehensively evaluates the trends in D. dendriticum research, can serve as a guide in facilitating future research plans to be a guide in this research area and to advance faster in the fight.
Acknowledgements
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.
References
- 1.Khan MA, Afshan K, Nazar M, Firasat S, Chaudhry U, Sargison ND. Molecular confirmation of Dicrocoelium dendriticum in the Himalayan ranges of Pakistan. Parasitol Int. 2021;81:102276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Manga-González MY, González-Lanza C, Cabanas E, Campo R. Contributions to and review of dicrocoeliosis, with special reference to the intermediate hosts of Dicrocoelium dendriticum. Parasitology. 2001;123(Suppl):S91–114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sandoval H, Manga-González MY, Castro JM. A tool for diagnosis of Dicrocoelium dendriticum infection: hatching eggs and molecular identification of the miracidium. Parasitol Res. 2013;112(4):1589–1595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Beck MA, Goater CP, Colwell DD. Comparative recruitment, morphology and reproduction of a generalist trematode, Dicrocoelium dendriticum, in three species of host. Parasitology. 2015;142(10):1297–1305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Paranjpe V, McCabe P, Mollah F, Bandy A, Hamerski C. A fluke catch: biliary obstruction and pancreatitis from dicrocoeliasis. VideoGIE. 2020;5(11):567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Meshgi B, Majidi-Rad M, Hanafi-Bojd AA, Kazemzadeh A. Predicting environmental suitability and geographical distribution of Dicrocoelium dendriticum at littoral of Caspian Sea: an ecological niche-based modeling. Prev Vet Med. 2019;170:104736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Otranto D, Traversa D. Dicrocoeliosis of ruminants: a little known fluke disease. Trends Parasitol. 2003;19(1):12–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chougar L, Harhoura K, Aissi M. First isolation of Dicrocoelium dendriticum among cattle in some Northern Algerian slaughterhouses. Vet World. 2019;12(7):1039–1045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jeandron A, Rinaldi L, Abdyldaieva G, Usubalieva J, Steinmann P, Cringoli G, Utzinger J. Human infections with Dicrocoelium dendriticum in Kyrgyzstan: the tip of the iceberg?. J Parasitol. 2011;97(6):1170–1172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Cengiz ZT, Yilmaz H, Dülger AC, Cicek M. Human infection with Dicrocoelium dendriticum in Turkey. Ann Saudi Med. 2010;30(2):159–161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Díaz P, Paz-Silva A, Sánchez-Andrade R, Suárez J, Pedreira J, Arias M, Díez-Baños P, Morrondo P. Assessment of climatic and orographic conditions on the infection by Calicophoron daubneyi and Dicrocoelium dendriticum in grazing beef cattle (NW Spain). Vet Parasitol. 2007;149(3–4):285–289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wang CR, Qiu JH, Zhu XQ, Han XH, Ni HB, Zhao JP, et al. Survey of helminths in adult sheep in Heilongjiang province, People’s Republic of China. Vet Parasitol. 2006; 140:378–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Murshed M, Al-Quraishy S, Mares M, Mohammed O, Aljawdah H. Survey of Dicrocoelium dendriticum Infection in imported Romani and local sheep and potential epidemiological role in Saudi Arabia. J Anim Sci Technol. 2022;64(6):1215–1225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ezatpour B, Hasanvand A, Azami M, Anbari K, Ahmadpour F. Prevalence of liver fluke infections in slaughtered animals in Lorestan. Iran J Parasit Dis. 2015;39(4):725–729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Arbabi M, Dalimi A, Ghafarifar F, Moghadam MF. Prevalence and intensity of Dicrocoelium dendriticum in sheep and goats of Iran. Res J Parasitol. 2011; 6:160–167. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Khedri J, Radfar MH, Nikbakht B, Zahedi R, Hosseini M, Azizzadeh M, Borji H. Parasitic causes of meat and organs in cattle at four slaughterhouses in Sistan-Baluchestan province, southeastern Iran between 2008 and 2016. Vet Med Sci. 2021;7(4):1230–1236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Shahbazi Y, Hashemnia M, Safavi EA. A retrospective survey of liver flukes in livestock based on abattoir data in Kermanshah, west of Iran. J Parasit Dis. 2016;40(3):948–953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Basualdo JA, Grenóvero MS, Bertucci E, Molina NB. Bibliometric analysis of scientific literature on intestinal parasites in Argentina during the period 1985–2014. Revista Argentina De Microbiología. 2016;48(2):171–179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Falagas ME, Karavasiou AI, Bliziotis IA. A bibliometric analysis of global trends of research productivity in tropical medicine. Acta Trop. 2006;99(2–3):155–159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Shah SM, Ahmad T, Chen S, Yuting G, Liu X, Yuan YA. Bibliometric Analysis of the One Hundred Most Cited Studies in Psychosomatic Research. Psychother Psychosom. 2021;90:425–430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Garfield E. The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA. 2006;295(1):90–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Abramo G, D’Angelo C, Di Costa F. Citations versus journal impact factor as proxy of quality: could the latter ever be preferable?. Scientometrics. 2010;84(3):821–833. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Cringoli G, Rinaldi L, Veneziano V, Capelli G, Scala A. The influence of flotation solution, sample dilution and the choice of McMaster slide area (volume) on the reliability of the McMaster technique in estimating the faecal egg counts of gastrointestinal strongyles and Dicrocoelium dendriticum in sheep. Vet Parasitol. 2004;123(1–2):121–131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Peng C, He M, Cutrona SL, Kiefe CI, Liu F, Wang Z. Theme trends and knowledge structure on mobile health apps: Bibliometric analysis. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2020;8(7):e18212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]