Abstract
A series of hitherto unknown sulfonamide-incorporated α-aminophosphonate derivatives were synthesized through the one-pot, two-step FeCl3-catalyzed coupling of 4-aminobenzenesulfonamide with the appropriate benzaldehydes and diethyl phosphite. The new sulfonamides inhibition studies were performed on four carbonic anhydrase isoforms, i.e., the cytosolic human (h) hCA I and II (off-targets) as well as transmembrane cancer-related hCA IX and XII (targets). Among the synthesized compounds, derivative 23 resulted in the most selective compound against both cancer-associated isoforms over the off-target hCA I (hCA I/IX = 78; hCA I/XII = 458) and hCA II (hCA II/IX = 10; hCA II/XII = 56) and the binding mode of both enantiomers R and S was investigated in silico.
Keywords: Carbonic anhydrases, Tumor-related isoforms, Sulfonamides, α-Aminophosphonates, Tail approach, Docking, In silico
The carbonic anhydrases (CAs, EC 4.2.1.1) belonging to a superfamily of metalloenzymes that play a vital role in various pathological processes such as respiration, pH balance, and secretion of electrolytes among a host of other functions;1 however, abnormal levels and/or activities of these enzymes have often been associated with many human disease states such as glaucoma, obesity, osteoporosis, neurological disorders, cancer, etc.2 Therefore, targeting of CAs can be and is exploited as one of the important therapeutic approaches to reduce its hyperactivity in relevant disorders.3 However, a general problem in the field of drug design of CA inhibitors (CAIs) is selectivity.4 So far, 15 human CA isoforms have been identified,5 which despite their different catalytic activity, localization in tissues, and subcellular localization, their active site and overall fold are very similar. Therefore, it is the greatest challenge to selectively inhibit a specific isoform over the others.
Needless to say, primary sulfonamides are the oldest and still the main class of CAIs (Figure 1).6,7 In this family of CAIs, benzenesulfonamide derivatives are the most explored scaffolds, and in general, they behave as very good CAIs but are not selective, limiting their potential. In order to bypass this limitation, the “tail approach” has emerged as a powerful strategy to obtain selective CAIs.8 This approach consists in appending one or more “tails” to the aromatic ring, leading to an elongated molecule that will be able to interact with the amino acid residues located at the middle and outer rims of the enzymatic cavity, which are the regions with the lowest homology sequences among the different isoforms.9 Amino acids are among the most popular groups, which were widely used as tail moieties that besides improving the selectivity of action of inhibitors also increase their water solubility.10
Figure 1.
Selected examples of commercialized sulfonamide-based CAIs.
The α-aminophosphonates are important analogues of α-amino acids, known to have high cell permeability11 and important roles in medicinal chemistry due to diverse biological activities such as antifungal12 antibacterial,13 antiviral,14 antioxidant,15 anticancer,16 and anti-Alzheimer17 activities. Therefore, appending this unique organophosphorus structural motif at the aromatic ring periphery of benzenesulfonamide derivatives may afford opportunities for the development of selective CAIs.
With the aim to enrich the knowladge on carbonic anhydrase inhibitors and in continuation of our works on this field,18 in this paper we report the design and synthesis of a panel of novel sulfonamide-incorporated α-aminophosphonates by Kabachnik–Fields reaction. Inhibitory activity of prepared compounds on the cytosolic isoforms hCA I and II, and the transmembrane, cancer-associated isoforms hCA IX and XII were studied (Figure 2).
Figure 2.
General structure of sulfonamides discussed in the paper.
The preparation of sulfonamide-incorporated α-aminophosphonates 20–34 was performed by following the synthetic scheme illustrated in Table 1 and described in detail in the Experimental Protocols section in Supporting Information (SI). The protected benzenesulfonamide 2 has been synthesized by following literature procedures.19 Reaction of this intermediate 2 with the appropriate benzaldehyde derivative 3 in the presence of a catalytic amount of FeCl3 afforded the corresponding imines 4, which by treatment with overstoichiometric amounts of diethyl phosphite led to the N-protected sulfonamide incorporating α-aminophosphonates 5–19. Removal of the protecting group in the presence of hydrazine hydrate afforded the desired α-aminophosphonate derivatives 20–34.
Table 1. Preparation of Sulfonamide-Incorporated α-Aminophosphonates 20–34a.
compd | R | yield (%)b | compd | R | yield (%)b |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 | 4-Me | 71 | 20 | 4-Me | 56 |
6 | 4-Ph | 24 | 21 | 4-Ph | 41 |
7 | 4-OMe | 66 | 22 | 4-OMe | 51 |
8 | 4-SMe | 43 | 23 | 4-SMe | 60 |
9 | 4-F | 84 | 24 | 4-F | 67 |
10 | 4-Cl | 69 | 25 | 4-Cl | 66 |
11 | 4-Br | 58 | 26 | 4-Br | 45 |
12 | 3-F | 75 | 27 | 3-F | 37 |
13 | 3-Br | 87 | 28 | 3-Br | 31 |
14 | 2-F | 65 | 29 | 2-F | 57 |
15 | 2-NO2 | 41 | 30 | 2-NO2 | 42 |
16 | 2-OMe-6-Br | 93 | 31 | 2-OMe-6-Br | 56 |
17 | 2,5-(OMe)2 | 57 | 32 | 2,5-(OMe)2 | 69 |
18 | 3,4-(OMe)2 | 80 | 33 | 3,4-(OMe)2 | 59 |
19 | 2,4,5-(OMe)3 | 56 | 34 | 2,4,5-(OMe)3 | 63 |
Reagents and conditions: (i) DMF-DMA (1.2 equiv), DMF, 0 °C, 1 h, 25 °C, 2 h; (ii) aldehyde (3, 1 equiv), FeCl3 (20 mol %), dry DMF, 100 °C, 2 h; (iii) HP(O)(OEt)2 (1.2 equiv), dry DMF, 100 °C, 2 h; (iv) NH2NH2·xH2O (24–26%), DMF (or NMP), r.t., 1.5 h.
Isolated yields.
The inhibitory ability of prepared sulfonamide-incorporated α-aminophosphonates was screened on hCA I and II (off-targets) and the transmembrane, cancer-related hCA IX and XII (anticancer drug targets) using stopped-flow assay method.20 The Ki data are summarized in Table 2 in comparison to those of the well-known carbonic anhydrase inhibitor acetazolamide (AAZ) as the reference drug.
Table 2. Inhibition Data of Human CA I, II, IX, and XII with Sulfonamide-Incorporated α-Aminophosphonates 20–34 and the Standard Sulfonamide Inhibitor Acetazolamide (AAZ) by a Stopped-Flow CO2 Hydrase Assay20.
Ki (nM)a |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
compd | R | hCA I | hCA II | hCA IX | hCA XII |
20 | 4-Me | 5603 | 231.8 | 146.6 | 30.7 |
21 | 4-Ph | 7344 | 561.1 | 224.7 | 27.6 |
22 | 4-OMe | 4815 | 831.9 | 140.2 | 14.8 |
23 | 4-SMe | 6231 | 759.7 | 80.2 | 13.6 |
24 | 4-F | 424.3 | 616.2 | 91.6 | 45.4 |
25 | 4-Cl | 528.6 | 33.8 | 141.7 | 71.9 |
26 | 4-Br | 289.2 | 27.2 | 153.5 | 240.5 |
27 | 3-F | 136.9 | 44.8 | 39.1 | 86.4 |
28 | 3-Br | 436.9 | 72.9 | 61.3 | 282.8 |
29 | 2-F | 162.9 | 8.8 | 26.7 | 72.0 |
30 | 2-NO2 | 234.0 | 15.7 | 293.2 | 49.3 |
31 | 2-Br,5-OMe | 312.8 | 26.9 | 346.3 | 197.6 |
32 | 2,5-(OMe)2 | 516.3 | 55.8 | 469.9 | 58.3 |
33 | 3,4-(OMe)2 | 707.3 | 65.5 | 117.8 | 38.2 |
34 | 2,4,5-(OMe)3 | 4623 | 51.8 | 249.3 | 142.5 |
AAZ | 250 | 12.5 | 25.0 | 5.7 |
Mean from 3 different assays, by a stopped-flow technique (errors were in the range of ±5–10% of the reported values).
Based on the inhibition data (Table 2), the following structure–activity relationship (SAR) can be drawn:
-
(i)
The cytosolic off-target isoform hCA I was moderately to poorly inhibited by the tested compounds with Ki values in the range of 136.9–7344 nM. Indeed, all of the synthesized compounds were less active than AAZ (Ki of 250 nM), except compounds 27, 29, and 30, with Ki values 136.9, 162.9, and 234.0 nM, respectively. The results clearly indicated that the inhibitory activity of the newly developed sulfonamides against this isoform was strongly dependent on the electronic effects of the substituent on the phenyl ring. Generally, electron-withdrawing groups (e.g., NO2, F, Cl, Br) at any position of the phenyl ring induced higher inhibitory activities compared to electron-donating groups (e.g., Me, OMe, SMe).
-
(ii)
The other off-target hCA II was potently inhibited by the compounds (25–31) substituted with electron-withdrawing groups, with inhibition constants ranging between 8.8 and 72.9 nM, in a similar range as AAZ (Ki of 12.5 nM). However, exceptionally, compound 24, possessing a 4-fluoro substituent displayed weak inhibitory action (Ki = 616.2 nM). The results indicated that the replacement of electron-withdrawing groups with electron-donating groups led to a decrease in the hCA II inhibition potency. As shown in Table 2, the molecules 20–23 bearing an electron-donating group poorly inhibited this isoform (Ki in the range of 231.8–831.9 nM). Interestingly, the installation of one more electron-donating functional group capable of forming hydrogen bonds to the electron-poor compounds, as in compounds 32 (Ki = 55.8 nM), 33 (Ki = 65.5 nM), and 34 (Ki = 51.8 nM) with respect to 22 (Ki = 831.9 nM), causes a considerable increase of the inhibitory activity against the target isoform.
-
(iii)
The cancer-associated target hCA IX was moderately inhibited by the newly developed sulfonamides showing Ki values in the range of 26.7–469.9 nM. Among the tested compounds, 29 exhibited the best activity against this isoform. Although this compound showed almost 6- and 3-fold more selectivity toward hCA IX over hCA I and hCA XII, it was 3-fold less selective toward this isoform versus hCA II. Compound 23 was the most selective inhibitor of the hCA IX Ki value of 80.2 nM, being 78- and 9.5-fold more selective toward this isoform versus the off-targeth CA I and II, respectively. It is interesting to note that comparison studies showed that the newly developed compounds displayed considerably better inhibition and selectivity against the titled isoform compared to their phosphonate-free analogues. For instance, compound 22 inhibits hCA IX up to 6-fold compared to its phosphonate-free analogue 35, while they exhibit almost same inhibitory activities toward the other tumor-associated isoform, hCA XII (Table 3),21 indicating that the presence of P(O)(OEt)2 fragment significantly improve the inhibitory activity and selectivity against hCA IX.
-
(iv)
The second cancer-associated hCA XII was the most inhibited isoform among the studied ones, with Ki in the range between 13.6 and 282.8 nM. Quite different behavior is found in the inhibition profile of the hCA XII compared to the off-target hCA I and II. The SAR showed that compounds bearing an electron-donating group exhibited better activity on CA XII compared to the corresponding electron-withdrawing substituted derivatives. 4-OMe-substituted derivative 22 and the 4-SMe-substituted derivative 23 were the most promising inhibitors of the series against hCA XII, which showed considerably high selectivity toward this isoform over hCA I (22, hCAI/XII = 325, 23, hCA I/XII = 458), hCA II (22, hCAII/XII = 56, 23, hCA II/hCA XII = 56), and hCA IX (22, hCAIX/XII = 10, and 23, hCA IX/XII = 6). Notably, AAZ displayed the following selectivity for hCA XII over the other isoforms considered in this study: hCAI/XII = 44, hCA II/XII = 2, and hCAIX/XII = 4. Therefore, of course, these compounds can be considered an interesting starting point for the discovery and development of novel anticancer agents.
Table 3. Inhibition Data of Human CA I, II, IX, and XII with Compound 22 and Its Phosphonate-Free Analogue 35.
Mean from 3 different assays, by a stopped-flow technique (errors were in the range of ±5–10% of the reported values).
Because three-tailed compound 23 displayed effective and selective inhibitory actions toward the target isoforms over the off-target isoforms CA I and II, both enantiomer R and S of this compound have been chosen to be submitted to docking studies to unveil the relationship between structural features and inhibition profile and to investigate their binding mode within the tumor-associated hCA IX and XII active site. The studies were extended to off-target hCA I and II for comparison. According to the literature,22−25 the benzenesulfonamide group binds the zinc ion through the deprotonated nitrogen of the −SO2NH– moiety (Figures 3 and 4), while the interactions involving T199 and the sulfonamide NH– and S=O, in H-bond distance with the hydroxyl side chain OH (O–H···N) and backbone NH (N–H···O=S) of T199, respectively, stabilize the metal coordination by the ligand. van der Waals (vdW) interactions between the aromatic ring and residues A121/V121 (hCA I/hCA II, IX, and XII,), V143, L198, and W205 further contribute to the stabilization of the compound within the binding site (Figures 3 and 4).
Figure 3.
Predicted binding mode of ligands (R)-23 (purple) and (S)-23 (magenta) within hCA I (orange: A,B) and hCA II (white; C,D) active site. H-Bonds are depicted as black; π–π stacking interactions are depicted cyan dashed lines.
Figure 4.
Predicted binding mode of ligands (R)-23 (purple) and (S)-23 (magenta) within the hCA IX (blue: A,B) and hCA XII (green; C,D) active site. H-bonds are depicted as black; π–cation interactions are depicted in green dashed lines.
Generally, the position of the 4-methylthiophenyl pendant characterizes the binding of both ligands (R)-23 and (S)-23 within isoforms I–II–IX and XII of the carbonic anhydrase. In hCA I, the pendant of (R)-23 orients toward the hydrophilic half of the active site engaging π–π stacking interaction with the peculiar H67 and vdW contacts between the ethyl tails and residues W5, H64, A135, H200, P201, P202, and V207 (Figure 3A).
The aromatic tail of the enantiomer (S)-23 is turned toward the hydrophobic cleft lined by L131, A132, A135, Y204, and P202, while the two aliphatic tails lodge into a hydrophobic area defined by residues W5, H200, and P201 and F91, L131, Q92, and H67 (Figure 3B).
Due to the F91/I91, L131/F131, H200/T200, and H67/N67 hCA I/II mutations, in hCA II the 4-methylthiophenyl pendant of 23 is positioned in a different area than hCA I, orienting toward the hydrophilic or hydrophobic half of the enzyme depending on the R (hydrophobic) or S (hydrophilic) enantiomer. In both cases, the compound can engage in a π–π stacking interaction with the peculiar F131 (Figure 3C,D). However, only the phosphate P=O group of enantiomer R is in H-bond distance with the side chain NH2 of Q92, while the ethyl tails of (R)-23 and (S)-23 are in vdW contacts with N62, N67, I91, V121, and Q92 and F131, V135, P201, P202, and L204, respectively.
In the wider hCA IX active site, the hydrophobic pocket lined by L135, P201, P202, and A204 accommodates the aromatic tail of both enantiomers of ligand 23, the phosphonate P=O moiety of (R)-23 is in H-bond distance with the side chains NH2 of Q92, while the P–O and P=O groups of (S)-23 form hydrogen bonds with the side chains NH2 of Q92 and Q67 (Figure 4A,B). In both R and S enantiomers, the two aliphatic tails undertake vdW interactions with N62, Q67, L91, Q92, V121, and V131.
In hCA XII active site, while (R)-23 allocates the 4-methylthiophenyl tails within the pocket defined by S135 P201, P202, and A204, engaging an H-bond with the phosphonate P=O and the side chain NH2 of Q92 (Figure 4C), the aromatic pendant of enantiomer S is involved in a π–cation interaction with the charged NH3+ of the peculiar residue K67 (Figure 4D). Furthermore, the P–O group of (S)-23 is in H-bond distance with side chain NH2 of Q92, and the ethyl tails of both enantiomers are in vdW contacts with K67, T91, Q92, A131, and S132.
The analysis of the binding modes resulting from docking points out the best complementarity of the investigated compound 23 within the tumor-associated isoform active clefts. It is likely that this is related to the best inhibition profile of compound 23 against hCA IX and XII.
In summary, a series of novel α-aminophosphonates bearing the biologically active benzenesulfonamide moiety were synthesized through the condensation of 4-aminobenzenesulfonamide with an appropriate benzaldehyde, followed by hydrophosphonylation of in situ generated imine with diethyl phosphite. The carbonic anhydrase inhibitory capability of these compounds was evaluated against the ubiquitous hCA I and hCA II and the transmembrane hCA IX and hCA XII being overexpressed in solid hypoxic tumors and being valid targets for anticancer agents. Among all isoforms considered in this study, hCA XII was more effectively inhibited by the newly developed compounds. Compound 22 was the most promising inhibitor of the series against hCA XII, which displayed high selectivity toward this isoform over hCA I (hCAI/XII = 325), hCA II (hCAII/XII = 56), and hCA IX (hCAIX/XII = 10). Instead, derivative 23 resulted in the most selective inhibitor against both tumor-associated isoforms over the off-target hCA I (hCA I/IX = 78; hCA I/XII = 458) and hCA II (hCA II/IX = 10; hCA II/XII = 56), and the binding mode of its enantiomers R and S was investigated in silico within the hCA I, II, IX, and XII active site.
Glossary
Abbreviations
- AAZ
acetazolamide
- CA
carbonic anhydrase
- CAIs
carbonic anhydrase inhibitors
- DMF
N,N-dimethylformamide
- DMF-DMA
N,N-dimethylformamide dimethyl acetal
- Ki
inhibitor constant
- Me
methyl
- NMP
N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone
- Ph
phenyl
- SAR
structure–activity relationship
- vdW
van der Waals
Supporting Information Available
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsmedchemlett.3c00200.
Chemical synthesis procedures, biological assay protocols, supporting figures, docking study protocol, compound characterization, and 1H and 13C NMR spectra of all final compounds (PDF)
Author Contributions
The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors./All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Supplementary Material
References
- Supuran C. T. Carbonic anhydrases-an overview. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2008, 14, 603–614. 10.2174/138161208783877884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Supuran C. T. Carbonic anhydrases: novel therapeutic applications for inhibitors and activators. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2008, 7, 168–181. 10.1038/nrd2467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Supuran C. T.; Scozzafava A. Carbonic anhydrases as targets for medicinal chemistry. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2007, 15, 4336–4350. 10.1016/j.bmc.2007.04.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Supuran C. T. Carbonic anhydrases as drug targets - an overview. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2007, 7, 825–833. 10.2174/156802607780636690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Supuran C. T. Structure-based drug discovery of carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2012, 27, 759–772. 10.3109/14756366.2012.672983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hassan M. I.; Shajee B.; Waheed A.; Ahmad F.; Sly W. S. Structure, function and applications of carbonic anhydrase isozymes. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2013, 21, 1570–1582. 10.1016/j.bmc.2012.04.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mann T.; Keilin D. Sulphanilamide as a specific inhibitor of carbonic anhydrase. Nature. 1940, 146, 164–165. 10.1038/146164a0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Supuran C. T.; Scozzafava A.; Casini A. Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. Med. Res. Rev. 2003, 23, 146–189. 10.1002/med.10025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Kumar A.; Siwach K.; Supuran C. T.; Sharma P. K. A decade of tail-approach based design of selective as well as potent tumor associated carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. Bioorg. Chem. 2022, 126, 105920. 10.1016/j.bioorg.2022.105920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Lopez M.; Salmon A. J.; Supuran C. T.; Poulsen S. A. Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors developed through ‘click tailing’. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2010, 16, 3277–3287. 10.2174/138161210793429869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bonardi A.; Nocentini A.; Bua S.; Combs J.; Lomelino C.; Andring J.; Lucarini L.; Sgambellone S.; Masini E.; McKenna R.; et al. Sulfonamide inhibitors of human carbonic anhydrases designed through a three-tails approach: improving ligand/isoform matching and selectivity of action. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 63, 7422–7444. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c00733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chiaramonte N.; Romanelli M. N.; Teodori E.; Supuran C. T. Amino acids as building blocks for carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. Metabolites. 2018, 8 (2), 36. 10.3390/metabo8020036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ali O. M.; Alotaibi M. T.; Zaki Y. H.; Amer H. H. Design, synthesis, and spectroscopic studies of some new α-aminophosphonate analogues derived from 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde with special reference to anticancer activity. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 2022, 16, 2589–2599. 10.2147/DDDT.S357998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Qin Y.; Xing R.; Liu S.; Yu H.; Li K.; Hu L.; Li P. Synthesis and antifungal properties of (4-tolyloxy)-pyrimidyl-α-aminophosphonates chitosan derivatives. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2014, 63, 83–91. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.10.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koszelewski D.; Kowalczyk P.; Śmigielski P.; Samsonowicz-Górski J.; Kramkowski K.; Wypych A.; Szymczak M.; Ostaszewski R. Relationship between structure and antibacterial activity of α-aminophosphonate derivatives obtained via lipase-catalyzed Kabachnik– Fields reaction. Materials. 2022, 15, 3846. 10.3390/ma15113846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hkiri S.; Mekni-Toujani M.; Üstün E.; Hosni K.; Ghram A.; Touil S.; Samarat A.; Sémeril D. Synthesis of novel 1,3,4-oxadiazole-derived α-aminophosphonates/α-aminophosphonic acids and evaluation of their in vitro antiviral activity against the avian coronavirus infectious bronchitis virus. Pharmaceutics. 2023, 15, 114. 10.3390/pharmaceutics15010114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rao K.U. M.; Swapna S.; Manidhar D. M.; Reddy K.M. K.; Reddy C. S. Efficient synthesis of α-aminophosphonates and evaluation of significance of P = O group towards antioxidant activity. Phosphorus Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem. 2015, 190 (2), 232–239. 10.1080/10426507.2014.914937. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Q.; Yang L.; Ding H.; Chen X.; Wang H.; Tang X. Synthesis, X-ray crystal structure, DNA/protein binding and cytotoxicity studies of five α-aminophosphonate N-derivatives. Bioorg. Chem. 2016, 69, 132–139. 10.1016/j.bioorg.2016.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Uparkar J. J.; Dhavan P. P.; Jadhav B. L.; Pawar S. D. Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of furan based α-aminophosphonate derivatives as anti-Alzheimer agent. J. Iran. Chem. Soc. 2022, 19, 3103–3116. 10.1007/s13738-022-02515-w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- a Abdoli M.; Angeli A.; Bozdag M.; Carta F.; Kakanejadifard A.; Saeidian H.; Supuran C. T. Synthesis and carbonic anhydrase I II, VI. I. and IX inhibition studies with a series of benzo [d] thiazole-5-and 6-sulfonamides. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2017, 32, 1071–1078. 10.1080/14756366.2017.1356295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Abdoli M.; Bozdag M.; Angeli A.; Supuran C. T. Benzamide-4-sulfonamides are effective human carbonic anhydrase I, II, VII and IX inhibitors. Metabolites. 2018, 8, 37. 10.3390/metabo8020037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Abdoli M.; Giovannuzzi S.; Supuran C. T.; Žalubovskis R. 4-(3-Alkyl/benzyl-guanidino) benzenesulfonamides as selective carbonic anhydrase VII inhibitors. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2022, 37, 1568–1576. 10.1080/14756366.2022.2080816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Abdoli M.; Bonardi A.; Supuran C. T.; Žalubovskis R. 4-Cyanamidobenzenesulfonamide derivatives: a novel class of human and bacterial carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2023, 38, 156–165. 10.1080/14756366.2022.2138367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Abdoli M.; De Luca V.; Capasso C.; Supuran C. T.; Žalubovskis R. Benzenesulfonamides incorporating hydantoin moieties effectively inhibit eukaryotic and human carbonic anhydrases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 14115. 10.3390/ijms232214115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f Ivanova J.; Abdoli M.; Nocentini A.; Žalubovskis R.; Supuran C. T. 1, ,3-Benzoxathiazine-2, 2-dioxides–effective inhibitors of human carbonic anhydrases. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2023, 38, 225–238. 10.1080/14756366.2022.2142787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g Abdoli M.; De Luca V.; Capasso C.; Supuran C. T.; Žalubovskis R. Inhibition studies on carbonic anhydrase isoforms I II, IX. and XII with a series of sulfaguanidines. ChemMedChem. 2023, 18, 202200658. 10.1002/cmdc.202200658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; h Abdoli M.; De Luca V.; Capasso C.; Supuran C. T.; Žalubovskis R. Novel thiazolone-benzenesulphonamide inhibitors of human and bacterial carbonic anhydrases. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2023, 38, 2163243. 10.1080/14756366.2022.2163243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; i Abdoli M.; Bonardi A.; Supuran C. T.; Žalubovskis R. Investigation of novel alkyl/benzyl (4-sulphamoylphenyl) carbamimidothioates as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2023, 38, 2152811. 10.1080/14756366.2022.2152811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; j Ivanova J.; Abdoli M.; Nocentini A.; Žalubovskis R.; Supuran C. T. Derivatives of 4-methyl-1, 2, 3-benzoxathiazine 2, 2-dioxide as selective inhibitors of human carbonic anhydrases IX and XII over the cytosolic isoforms I and II. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2023, 38, 2170370. 10.1080/14756366.2023.2170370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; k Abdoli M.; Supuran C. T.; Žalubovskis R. 2-((1H-Benzo [d] imidazol-2-yl) amino) benzo [d] thiazole-6-sulphonamides: a class of carbonic anhydrase II and VII-selective inhibitors. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2023, 38, 2174981. 10.1080/14756366.2023.2174981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chandna N.; Chandak N.; Kumar P.; Kapoor J. K.; Sharma P. K. Metal- and solvent-free synthesis of N-sulfonylformamidines. Green Chem. 2013, 15, 2294–2301. 10.1039/c3gc40797g. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Khalifah R. G. The carbon dioxide hydration activity of carbonic anhydrase: I. Stop-flow kinetic studies on the native human isoenzymes B and C. J. Biol. Chem. 1971, 246, 2561–2573. 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)62326-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Durgun M.; Turkmen H.; Ceruso M.; Supuran C. T. Synthesis of 4-sulfamoylphenyl-benzylamine derivatives with inhibitory activity against human carbonic anhydrase isoforms I, II, IX and XII. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2016, 24 (5), 982–988. 10.1016/j.bmc.2016.01.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Srivastava D. K.; Jude K. M.; Banerjee A. L.; Haldar M.; Manokaran S.; Kooren J.; Mallik S.; Christianson D. W. Structural analysis of charge discrimination in the binding of inhibitors to human carbonic anhydrases I and II. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129 (17), 5528–5537. 10.1021/ja068359w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Behnke C. A.; Le Trong I.; Godden J. W.; Merritt E. A.; Teller D. C.; Bajorath J.; Stenkamp R. E. Atomic resolution studies of carbonic anhydrase II. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 2010, 66, 616–627. 10.1107/S0907444910006554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leitans J.; Kazaks A.; Balode A.; Ivanova J.; Zalubovskis R.; Supuran C. T.; Tars K. Efficient expression and crystallization system of cancer-associated carbonic anhydrase isoform IX. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 58 (22), 9004–9009. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Whittington D. A.; Waheed A.; Ulmasov B.; Shah G. N.; Grubb J. H.; Sly W. S.; Christianson D. W. Crystal structure of the dimeric extracellular domain of human carbonic anhydrase XII, a bitopic membrane protein overexpressed in certain cancer tumor cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 2001, 98 (17), 9545–9550. 10.1073/pnas.161301298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.