Skip to main content
The British Journal of Ophthalmology logoLink to The British Journal of Ophthalmology
. 1991 Aug;75(8):493–495. doi: 10.1136/bjo.75.8.493

Regression analysis of visual field progression in low tension glaucoma.

B N Noureddin 1, D Poinoosawmy 1, F W Fietzke 1, R A Hitchings 1
PMCID: PMC1042440  PMID: 1873271

Abstract

Eighty four patients (168 eyes) with low tension glaucoma were retrospectively reviewed (mean follow-up was 28 months). The mean age was 66 years, and 69% were females. Regression analysis of their automated Humphrey fields (a mean of eight fields per eye) showed progression in 50% of patients and in 37% of eyes. There was no statistically significant difference between patients with progression and non-progression with respect to age (p less than 0.05) or intraocular pressure (p less than 0.5). Visual field defects were located most frequently in the superior hemifield in both groups of patients. A considerable proportion of patients had advanced field loss at the time of diagnosis.

Full text

PDF
493

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BLOOMFIELD S. The results of surgery for low-tension glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1953 Aug;36(8):1067–1070. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(53)91887-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Caprioli J., Spaeth G. L. Comparison of visual field defects in the low-tension glaucomas with those in the high-tension glaucomas. Am J Ophthalmol. 1984 Jun;97(6):730–737. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(84)90505-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chauhan B. C., Drance S. M., Douglas G. R., Johnson C. A. Visual field damage in normal-tension and high-tension glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989 Dec 15;108(6):636–642. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(89)90854-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chumbley L. C., Brubaker R. F. Low-tension glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1976 Jun;81(6):761–767. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(76)90359-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Drance S. M., Douglas G. R., Airaksinen P. J., Schulzer M., Hitchings R. A. Diffuse visual field loss in chronic open-angle and low-tension glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1987 Dec 15;104(6):577–580. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(87)90166-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gliklich R. E., Steinmann W. C., Spaeth G. L. Visual field change in low-tension glaucoma over a five-year follow-up. Ophthalmology. 1989 Mar;96(3):316–320. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(89)33070-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hitchings R. A., Anderton S. A. A comparative study of visual field defects seen in patients with low-tension glaucoma and chronic simple glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1983 Dec;67(12):818–821. doi: 10.1136/bjo.67.12.818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hitchings R. A. Low tension glaucoma--is treatment worthwhile? Eye (Lond) 1988;2(Pt 6):636–640. doi: 10.1038/eye.1988.117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. King D., Drance S. M., Douglas G., Schulzer M., Wijsman K. Comparison of visual field defects in normal-tension glaucoma and high-tension glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1986 Feb 15;101(2):204–207. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(86)90596-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Levene R. Z. Low tension glaucoma: a critical review and new material. Surv Ophthalmol. 1980 May-Jun;24(6):621–664. doi: 10.1016/0039-6257(80)90123-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lewis R. A., Hayreh S. S., Phelps C. D. Optic disk and visual field correlations in primary open-angle and low-tension glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1983 Aug;96(2):148–152. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)77781-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Motolko M., Drance S. M., Douglas G. R. Visual field defects in low-tension glaucoma. Comparison of defects in low-tension glaucoma and chronic open angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1982 Jul;100(7):1074–1077. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1982.01030040052005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. de Jong N., Greve E. L., Hoyng P. F., Geijssen H. C. Results of a filtering procedure in low tension glaucoma. Int Ophthalmol. 1989 Jan;13(1-2):131–138. doi: 10.1007/BF02028653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES