Skip to main content
The British Journal of Ophthalmology logoLink to The British Journal of Ophthalmology
. 1977 Aug;61(8):510–511. doi: 10.1136/bjo.61.8.510

Normal response to pilocarpine and phenylephrine.

R Mapstone
PMCID: PMC1043028  PMID: 911730

Abstract

Fifty-eight eyes from 58 patients in which there was no evidence of glaucoma were provoked with pilocarpine and phenylephrine drops. The result was a significant reduction in intraocular pressure and a significant increase in outflow facility. The 58 eyes were randomised and 19 submitted to a 'dummy' provocative test. There was no significant change in either pressure or outflow facility. The effect of the pilocarpine/phenylephrine provocative test in normal eyes is to produce a response that is the opposite of a positive provocative test in eyes at risk of developing closed-angle glaucoma.

Full text

PDF
510

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Harris L. S., Galin M. A. Dose response analysis of pilocarpine-induced ocular hypotension. Arch Ophthalmol. 1970 Nov;84(5):605–608. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1970.00990040607008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. KRONFELD P. C. DOSE-EFFECT RELATIONSHIPS AS AN AID IN THE EVALUATION OF OCULAR HYPOTENSIVE DRUGS. Invest Ophthalmol. 1964 Jun;3:258–265. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Mapstone R. Precipitation of angle closure. Br J Ophthalmol. 1974 Jan;58(1):46–54. doi: 10.1136/bjo.58.1.46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Mapstone R. Provocative tests in closed-angle glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1976 Feb;60(2):115–119. doi: 10.1136/bjo.60.2.115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Mapstone R. The syndrome of closed-angle glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1976 Feb;60(2):120–123. doi: 10.1136/bjo.60.2.120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES