Skip to main content
The British Journal of Ophthalmology logoLink to The British Journal of Ophthalmology
. 1977 Oct;61(10):646–649. doi: 10.1136/bjo.61.10.646

The influence of pregnancy on the sensitivity of the cornea.

M Millodot
PMCID: PMC1043076  PMID: 588517

Abstract

Corneal touch thresholds (CTT) were measured in 30 non-pregnant women serving as a control group and 29 pregnant women at different times during and after pregnancy. The results show that CTT becomes significantly higher after 31 weeks of pregnancy. However, only 86% of the subjects showed a difference in CTT during and after pregnancy, while 52% reported having some swelling. The loss of sensitivity (CTT-1) is assumed to be related to the water retention occurring during pregnancy, a view which is supported by some measurements of corneal thickness. It is suggested that this study may have exposed a new, hitherto unknown, way of monitoring pregnant women.

Full text

PDF
646

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BOBERG-ANS J. Experience in clinical examination of corneal sensitivity; corneal sensitivity and the naso-lacrimal reflex after retrobulbar anaesthesia. Br J Ophthalmol. 1955 Dec;39(12):705–726. doi: 10.1136/bjo.39.12.705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fatt I., Harris M. G. Refractive index of the cornea as a function of its thickness. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom. 1973 May;50(5):383–386. doi: 10.1097/00006324-197305000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Horven I., Gjonnaess H. Corneal indentation pulse and intraocular pressure in pregnancy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1974 Feb;91(2):92–98. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1974.03900060098002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Millodot M. Diurnal variation of corneal sensitivity. Br J Ophthalmol. 1972 Nov;56(11):844–847. doi: 10.1136/bjo.56.11.844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Millodot M. Do blue-eyed people have more sensitive corneas than brown-eyed people? Nature. 1975 May 8;255(5504):151–151. doi: 10.1038/255151a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Millodot M. Effect of hard contact lenses on corneal sensitivity and thickness. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1975 Sep;53(4):576–584. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1975.tb01776.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Millodot M., Lamont A. Influence of menstruation on corneal sensitivity. Br J Ophthalmol. 1974 Aug;58(8):752–756. doi: 10.1136/bjo.58.8.752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Millodot M. Objective measurement of corneal sensitivity. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1973;51(3):325–334. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1973.tb06010.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mishima S., Hedbys B. O. Measurement of corneal thickness with the Haag-Streit pachometer. Arch Ophthalmol. 1968 Dec;80(6):710–713. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1968.00980050712005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Robertson E. G. The natural history of oedema during pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1971 Jun;78(6):520–529. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1971.tb00310.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Thomson A. M., Hytten F. E., Billewicz W. Z. The epidemiology of oedema during pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1967 Feb;74(1):1–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1967.tb03924.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES