Skip to main content
The British Journal of Ophthalmology logoLink to The British Journal of Ophthalmology
. 1978 Apr;62(4):227–239. doi: 10.1136/bjo.62.4.227

Neurophysiological investigation in optic nerve disease: combined assessment of the visual evoked response and electroretinogram.

H Ikeda, K E Tremain, M D Sanders
PMCID: PMC1043194  PMID: 646982

Full text

PDF
227

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arden G. B. Proceedings: The visual evoked response in ophthalmology. Proc R Soc Med. 1973 Oct;66(10):1037–1043. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Asselman P., Chadwick D. W., Marsden D. C. Visual evoked responses in the diagnosis and management of patients suspected of multiple sclerosis. Brain. 1975 Jun;98(2):261–282. doi: 10.1093/brain/98.2.261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bostock H., Sears T. A. Continuous conduction in demyelinated mammalian nerve fibers. Nature. 1976 Oct 28;263(5580):786–787. doi: 10.1038/263786a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. COWAN W. M., POWELL T. P. CENTRIFUGAL FIBRES IN THE AVIAN VISUAL SYSTEM. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1963 Sep 17;158:232–252. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1963.0045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cowey A. Atrophy of retinal ganglion cells after removal of striate cortex in a rhesus monkey. Perception. 1974;3(3):257–260. doi: 10.1068/p030257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. DAWSON G. D. A summation technique for the detection of small evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1954 Feb;6(1):65–84. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(54)90007-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Feinsod M., Rowe H., Auerbach E. Changes in the electroretinogram in patients with optic nerve lesions. Doc Ophthalmol. 1971 May 14;29(2):169–200. doi: 10.1007/BF02456520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Garey L. J., Fisken R. A., Powell T. P. Effects of experimental deafferentation on cells in the lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat. Brain Res. 1973 Mar 30;52:363–369. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(73)90672-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gills J. P., Jr The electroretinogram after section of the optic nerve in man. Am J Ophthalmol. 1966 Aug;62(2):287–291. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(66)91487-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Halliday A. M., Halliday E., Kriss A., McDonald W. I., Mushin J. The pattern-evoked potential in compression of the anterior visual pathways. Brain. 1976 Jun;99(2):357–374. doi: 10.1093/brain/99.2.357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Halliday A. M., McDonald W. I., Mushin J. Delayed pattern-evoked responses in optic neuritis in relation to visual acuity. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K. 1973;93(0):315–324. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Halliday A. M., McDonald W. I., Mushin J. Delayed visual evoked response in optic neuritis. Lancet. 1972 May 6;1(7758):982–985. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(72)91155-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Halliday A. M., McDonald W. I., Mushin J. Visual evoked response in diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Br Med J. 1973 Dec 15;4(5893):661–664. doi: 10.1136/bmj.4.5893.661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Halliday A. M., McDonald W. I. Pathophysiology of demyelinating disease. Br Med Bull. 1977 Jan;33(1):21–27. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a071390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Halliday A. M. Visually evoked responses in optic nerve disease. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K. 1976 Sep;96(3):372–376. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hennerici M., Wenzel D., Freund H. J. The comparison of small-size rectangle and checkerboard stimulation for the evaluation of delayed visual evoked responses in patients suspected of multiple sclerosis. Brain. 1977 Mar;100(Pt 1):119–136. doi: 10.1093/brain/100.1.119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ikeda H., Wright M. J. Receptive field organization of 'sustained' and 'transient' retinal ganglion cells which subserve different function roles. J Physiol. 1972 Dec;227(3):769–800. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp010058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. JACOBSON J. H., SUZUKI T. A. Effects of optic nerve section on the ERG. Arch Ophthalmol. 1962 Jun;67:791–801. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1962.00960020791015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. KUPFER C., PALMER P. LATERAL GENICULATE NUCLEUS: HISTOLOGICAL AND CYTOCHEMICAL CHANGES FOLLOWING AFFERENT DENERVATION AND VISUAL DEPRIVATION. Exp Neurol. 1964 May;9:400–409. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(64)90074-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Matthews M. R., Cowan W. M., Powell T. P. Transneuronal cell degeneration in the lateral geniculate nucleus of the macaque monkey. J Anat. 1960 Apr;94(Pt 2):145–169. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. McDonald W. I. Conduction in the optic nerve. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K. 1976 Sep;96(3):352–354. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. McDonald W. I., Halliday A. M. Diagnosis and classification of multiple sclerosis. Br Med Bull. 1977 Jan;33(1):4–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. McDonald W. I., Sears T. A. The effects of experimental demyelination on conduction in the central nervous system. Brain. 1970;93(3):583–598. doi: 10.1093/brain/93.3.583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Regan D., Milner B. A., Heron J. R. Delayed visual perception and delayed visual evoked potentials in the spinal form of multiple sclerosis and in retrobulbar neuritis. Brain. 1976 Mar;99(1):43–66. doi: 10.1093/brain/99.1.43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sanders M. D. Diagnostic difficulties in optic nerve disease and in papilloedema and disc oedema. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K. 1976 Sep;96(3):386–394. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES