ABSTRACT
Enteropathogenic bacteria express two-component systems (TCSs) to sense and respond to host environments, developing resistance to host innate immune systems like cationic antimicrobial peptides (CAMPs). Although an opportunistic human pathogen Vibrio vulnificus shows intrinsic resistance to the CAMP-like polymyxin B (PMB), its TCSs responsible for resistance have barely been investigated. Here, a mutant exhibiting a reduced growth rate in the presence of PMB was screened from a random transposon mutant library of V. vulnificus, and response regulator CarR of the CarRS TCS was identified as essential for its PMB resistance. Transcriptome analysis revealed that CarR strongly activates the expression of the eptA, tolCV2, and carRS operons. In particular, the eptA operon plays a major role in developing the CarR-mediated PMB resistance. Phosphorylation of CarR by the sensor kinase CarS is required for the regulation of its downstream genes, leading to the PMB resistance. Nevertheless, CarR directly binds to specific sequences in the upstream regions of the eptA and carRS operons, regardless of its phosphorylation. Notably, the CarRS TCS alters its own activation state by responding to several environmental stresses, including PMB, divalent cations, bile salts, and pH change. Furthermore, CarR modulates the resistance of V. vulnificus to bile salts and acidic pH among the stresses, as well as PMB. Altogether, this study suggests that the CarRS TCS, in responding to multiple host environmental signals, could provide V. vulnificus with the benefit of surviving within the host by enhancing its optimal fitness during infection.
IMPORTANCE Enteropathogenic bacteria have evolved multiple TCSs to recognize and appropriately respond to host environments. CAMP is one of the inherent host barriers that the pathogens encounter during the course of infection. In this study, the CarRS TCS of V. vulnificus was found to develop resistance to PMB, a CAMP-like antimicrobial peptide, by directly activating the expression of the eptA operon. Although CarR binds to the upstream regions of the eptA and carRS operons regardless of phosphorylation, phosphorylation of CarR is required for the regulation of the operons, resulting in the PMB resistance. Furthermore, the CarRS TCS determines the resistance of V. vulnificus to bile salts and acidic pH by differentially regulating its own activation state in response to these environmental stresses. Altogether, the CarRS TCS responds to multiple host-related signals, and thus could enhance the survival of V. vulnificus within the host, leading to successful infection.
KEYWORDS: Vibrio vulnificus, two-component system, polymyxin B resistance, transcriptome analysis, host environmental signals
INTRODUCTION
For successful survival within the host, pathogenic bacteria should recognize their environments and elaborately regulate the expression of genes involved in the defense against the host immune system. Accordingly, pathogenic bacteria have evolved two-component systems (TCSs) to sense and respond to various host environments (1, 2). The TCS, consisting of a sensor kinase and a response regulator, transduces signals through phosphorelay reaction. When activated by specific environmental signals, the sensor kinase autophosphorylates its conserved His residue and then transfers the phosphoryl group to a conserved Asp residue of the response regulator. Generally, the phosphorylated form of the response regulator is considered an active form able to modulate the expression of its target genes (3).
During infection, enteropathogenic bacteria inevitably encounter several barriers, such as gastric acid, bile, and cationic antimicrobial peptides (CAMPs), raised by the host innate immune system (4–6). CAMPs, including α-defensin and cathelicidin, are produced by the host epithelial cells, and their production is highly induced upon bacterial infection (6–8). CAMPs bind to negatively charged lipopolysaccharides (LPSs) of bacteria and lead to their lysis. Bacteria modify their LPS structures by adding positively charged moieties like phosphoethanolamine and 4-amino-4-deoxy-l-arabinose to prevent the binding of CAMPs to their surface. Another strategy for bacteria to resist CAMPs is associated with efflux pumps that extrude the antimicrobial peptides in an energy-dependent manner (9).
Polymyxin B (PMB) is an antimicrobial peptide and possesses a mechanism of action similar to that of CAMPs. Although PMB is one of the last treatments for Gram-negative bacteria, some bacterial species have been reported to be intrinsically resistant to the antimicrobial agent (10, 11). Especially, Vibrio cholerae has been reported to show resistance to PMB, as well as CAMPs, through a CarRS (also known as VprAB) TCS (12, 13). The CarRS TCS develops resistance to the antimicrobial peptides by activating the expression of almEFG which encodes a unique LPS modification system of V. cholerae (12, 14). Meanwhile, a recent study revealed that the CarRS TCS senses α-defensin as a host-related signal to facilitate the production of virulence factors (15). Accordingly, the CarRS TCS is an important signal transduction system contributing to the successful pathogenesis of V. cholerae, as well as its PMB resistance.
A Gram-negative human pathogen Vibrio vulnificus commonly contaminates oysters and causes a range of foodborne diseases from gastroenteritis to life-threatening septicemia (16–18). Similarly to V. cholerae, V. vulnificus also shows intrinsic resistance to PMB (19, 20). However, the mechanism by which V. vulnificus develops the PMB resistance has not yet been characterized in detail. In the present study, V. vulnificus open reading frame (ORF) encoding a homolog of V. cholerae CarR was identified by a transposon-tagging method in an effort to search the factors involved in the resistance to PMB. Genetic analyses revealed that V. vulnificus CarR contributes to the PMB resistance and activates the expression of the eptA and tolCV2 operons which are involved in LPS modification and efflux of antibiotics, respectively. CarR also positively autoregulates the expression of the carRS operon. Among the CarR regulon, the eptA operon plays a major role in the CarR-mediated PMB resistance. The response regulator CarR is phosphorylated by the sensor kinase CarS, and the phosphorylation is strictly required for the regulation of the eptA and carR expression that leads to the PMB resistance. CarR directly and specifically binds to the upstream regions of the eptA and carRS operons, but its DNA-binding ability is independent of phosphorylation. Notably, the CarRS TCS alters its own activation state in response to various environmental stresses, such as PMB, divalent cations including Mg2+ and Ca2+, bile salts, and pH change, that V. vulnificus may encounter in the infected host. Furthermore, CarR significantly affects the resistance of V. vulnificus to bile salts and acidic pH among the stresses, as well as PMB. Altogether, this study suggests that the CarRS TCS, essential for the PMB resistance, responds to host environmental signals, leading to successful survival of V. vulnificus during infection.
RESULTS
The response regulator CarR contributes to the PMB resistance of V. vulnificus.
Using a transposon-tagging method, the VVMO6_RS15995 gene was identified from a mutant of V. vulnificus that exhibited a decreased growth rate in the presence of PMB than a wild type. A protein encoded by VVMO6_RS15995 is predicted to contain an N-terminal receiver domain and a C-terminal DNA-binding domain. As the protein shows sequence homology with the response regulator CarR of V. cholerae, VVMO6_RS15995 was designated as carR of V. vulnificus. Additionally, the VVMO6_RS15990, which is located immediately downstream from carR, is predicted to encode a homolog of the sensor kinase CarS of V. cholerae. This observation prompted us to designate VVMO6_RS15990 as carS and to suggest that the products of carRS constitute the CarRS TCS of V. vulnificus. To examine the role of CarR of V. vulnificus in the PMB resistance, a ΔcarR strain was constructed and its growth was compared with that of the wild-type strain in the absence or presence of PMB. In the absence of PMB, the growth of the ΔcarR strain was similar to that of the wild-type strain (Fig. 1A). However, the growth of the ΔcarR strain was significantly retarded in the presence of PMB and restored to the wild-type level by complementation (Fig. 1B). These results suggested that the response regulator CarR contributes to the PMB resistance of V. vulnificus.
Transcriptome analysis identified the CarR-regulated genes.
For comprehensive identification of the CarR regulon, the transcriptome changes induced by the carR deletion were analyzed by RNA-seq. Compared with the wild-type strain, the ΔcarR strain differentially expressed a total of 28 genes, of which 26 genes were downregulated and 2 genes were upregulated (Table S1 in the supplemental material). The number of the downregulated genes and their overall fold changes were greater than those of the upregulated genes (Table S1), implying that CarR primarily acts as an activator rather than a repressor.
Among the downregulated genes, VVMO6_RS15985 showed the highest fold change (about 400-fold), and the sequentially located VVMO6_RS15980 and VVMO6_RS15975 also showed similar fold changes by the carR deletion (Fig. 2). The proteins encoded by VVMO6_RS15985, VVMO6_RS15980, and VVMO6_RS15975 are involved in the LPS modification system, showing homology with diacylglycerol kinase DgkA, phosphoethanolamine transferase EptA, and phosphoglycerol transferase I MdoB, respectively. These results suggested that the three genes VVMO6_RS15985, VVMO6_RS15980, and VVMO6_RS15975 (dgkA, eptA, and mdoB, respectively) are activated by CarR in an operon, hereinafter named the eptA operon. Besides the eptA operon, VVMO6_RS21740, encoding the TolC-like outer membrane channel protein TolCV2, was also differentially expressed by the carR deletion (Fig. 2). VVMO6_RS21740 (tolCV2) is the second ORF of an operon containing four additional ORFs, VVMO6_RS21745, VVMO6_RS21735, VVMO6_RS21730, and VVMO6_RS21725, hereinafter named the tolCV2 operon (Table S1). The tolCV2 operon is predicted to encode a tripartite efflux pump which consists of the inner membrane transporter, periplasmic membrane fusion protein, and outer membrane channel protein (21). In addition, the carRS operon is also downregulated by the carR deletion, suggesting that CarR activates its own expression (Fig. 2). Altogether, the transcriptome analysis revealed that CarR strongly activates the expression of the eptA, tolCV2, and carRS operons.
CarR develops the PMB resistance through the activation of the eptA operon.
To validate the RNA-seq results, the transcript levels of the CarR regulon in the ΔcarR strain were compared with those in the wild-type strain. Consistent with the RNA-seq results, the transcript levels of eptA, tolCV2, and carR were extremely lower in the ΔcarR strain than those in the wild-type strain (Fig. 3A). The results indicated again that CarR is a strong activator for the eptA, tolCV2, and carRS operons.
It has been reported that both the LPS modification system and the tripartite efflux pump are involved in the PMB resistance of other bacteria (22–24). Therefore, further investigations were performed to figure out whether the eptA and/or tolCV2 operons directly confer the PMB resistance on V. vulnificus. The ΔeptA strain was first generated, and its MIC of PMB was compared with that in the wild-type strain. The ΔeptA strain showed a 2-fold lower MIC than the wild-type strain (Fig. 3B), indicating that EptA increases the PMB resistance of V. vulnificus. Then, the dgkA and mdoB genes were further deleted in the ΔeptA strain to generate the ΔeptAoperon strain deficient in the whole eptA operon. The MIC of PMB in the ΔeptAoperon strain was further decreased to a level identical to that in the ΔcarR strain (Fig. 3B). On the other hand, deletion of the tolCV2 operon did not affect the PMB resistance of V. vulnificus (Fig. 3B). Altogether, these results suggested that CarR develops the PMB resistance of V. vulnificus by activating eptA expression and that two additional genes in the eptA operon, dgkA and mdoB, are required for complete development of the antibiotic resistance.
CarR phosphorylation is essential for the gene regulation and PMB resistance.
CarR and CarS of V. vulnificus contain a conserved Asp (D55) and His (H220) residue, respectively, which are expected to be phosphorylated (Fig. S1). To examine the roles of the two residues in the CarR phosphorylation, the carRD55A strain, producing a mutant CarR with Ala substitution of D55 (CarRD55A), and the carSH220A strain, producing a mutant CarS with Ala substitution of H220 (CarSH220A), were generated, and the phosphorylation status of CarR in the V. vulnificus strains was evaluated. Phosphorylated CarR (CarR-P) was clearly detected in the wild-type strain, and its cellular level accounted for about 8% of that of total CarR (CarRtotal) under our test condition (Fig. 4A and B). However, CarR-P was not detected in the carRD55A strain (Fig. 4A and B), indicating that D55 is the phosphorylation site of CarR. CarR-P in the ΔcarS and carSH220A strains was also undetectable by immunoblotting (Fig. 4A and B), indicating that H220 of CarS is obviously involved in the CarR phosphorylation.
Then, the effects of the CarR phosphorylation on the gene regulation and PMB resistance were examined. The expression levels of eptA in the carRD55A and carSH220A strains were comparable with those in the ΔcarR and ΔcarS strains, respectively (Fig. 4C). Similarly, the expression levels of carR in the carRD55A and carSH220A strains were also close to those in the ΔcarR and ΔcarS strains, respectively (Fig. 4C). Additionally, the MICs of PMB in the carRD55A and carSH220A strains were the same as those in the ΔcarR and ΔcarS strains, respectively (Fig. 4D). The combined results indicated that CarR phosphorylation is essential for the activation of the eptA and carR expression, and thus, the development of PMB resistance. Altogether, CarS phosphorylates CarR, and the resulting CarR-P, an active form of CarR, activates the expression of its downstream genes, leading to the PMB resistance of V. vulnificus.
CarR directly binds to the upstream regions of the eptA and carRS operons.
To identify whether CarR directly regulates the expression of the eptA and carRS operons, CarR binding to their upstream regions was examined by electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs). The addition of CarR to each labeled DNA probe, encompassing the upstream region of either the eptA or carRS operon, resulted in a single retarded band of a CarR-DNA complex in a CarR concentration-dependent manner. Additionally, the same but unlabeled DNA probes competed for binding to CarR in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 5A and B). These results indicated that CarR directly binds to the upstream regions of the eptA and carRS operons. Then, the binding of CarRD55A to the same upstream regions was compared with that of CarR. Interestingly, the binding affinity of CarRD55A to each upstream region was similar to that of CarR (Fig. 5C and D), suggesting that CarR does not require phosphorylation to bind to the upstream regions of the eptA and carRS operons.
To identify the specific binding sequences for CarR in the upstream regions of the eptA and carRS operons, DNase I protection assays were performed using the same DNA probes. The addition of CarR resulted in the protection of a single binding site of 35-bp and 27-bp in the upstream regions of the eptA and carRS operons, respectively (Fig. 6A and B). Alignment of the DNA sequences protected by CarR revealed a consensus motif, GACAN6TACA (Fig. 6C), which is proposed as a putative CarR binding sequence. Combined with the EMSA results, these results suggested that, whether phosphorylated or not, CarR directly binds to the specific sequences in the upstream regions of the eptA and carRS operons.
The CarRS TCS responds to multiple signals related to host environments.
It has been widely known that TCSs respond to certain environmental signals and alter their own activation state, resulting in changes in their expression levels. To identify the specific signals to which the CarRS TCS responds, the levels of the carRS promoter (PcarRS) activities were examined in the V. vulnificus strains under different host environmental stresses. For this purpose, the PcarRS activities were determined by measuring the cellular luminescence of the V. vulnificus strains carrying the PcarRS-luxCDABE reporter plasmid. The PcarRS activity of the wild-type strain was significantly increased by the addition of PMB and decreased by the addition of divalent cations, including Mg2+ and Ca2+, and bile salts to the culture medium, whereas the PcarRS activities of the ΔcarR and ΔcarS strains were not altered by exposure to these environmental stresses (Fig. 7A to C). Meanwhile, the PcarRS activities of the ΔcarR and ΔcarS strains, as well as the wild-type strain, were elevated by the acidic pH in the culture medium. However, the PcarRS activity of the wild-type strain showed a greater increment than those of the ΔcarR and ΔcarS strains (Fig. 7D). Collectively, these results suggested that the CarRS TCS alters its activation state by responding to host-related signals such as PMB, divalent cations, bile salts, and pH change.
CarR is associated with resistance to bile salts and acidic pH.
To investigate the physiological role of the CarRS TCS responding to the host-related signals, the growth of the wild-type and ΔcarR strains was monitored under various environmental stresses. The growth of the wild type was not affected by the carR deletion in the extremely low concentration of Mg2+ (Fig. S2A). However, the growth rate of the wild type was altered by the carR deletion in the presence of bile salts or in the acidic pH (Fig. S2B and C). Therefore, the surviving V. vulnificus cells exposed to bile salts or acidic pH were further quantitated. Compared with the wild type, the survival of the ΔcarR strain was significantly enhanced in the presence of bile salts but reduced at acidic pH (Fig. 8). Altogether, these results suggested that CarR affects the ability of V. vulnificus to survive and overcome host stresses including bile salts and acidic pH.
DISCUSSION
In this study, the CarRS TCS that develops the PMB resistance of V. vulnificus was newly identified (Fig. 1). The response regulator CarR activates the expression of the eptA operon consisting of three genes, dgkA, eptA, and mdoB, thereby providing V. vulnificus with the PMB resistance (Fig. 2 and 3). It has been well known that EptA adds a phosphoethanolamine moiety to lipid A and confers PMB resistance to other Vibrio species including V. cholerae and V. parahaemolyticus (25–27). However, the eptA expression is not regulated by the CarRS TCS in V. cholerae (26). In V. parahaemolyticus, EptA increases survival within macrophage cells (27), suggesting that LPS modification induces resistance to host immune clearance. Meanwhile, the expression of the tolCV2 operon is also positively regulated by CarR, showing an expression fold change similar to that of the eptA operon (Table S1). However, the tolCV2 operon does not affect the PMB resistance of V. vulnificus (Fig. 3B). Although the biological role of tolCV2 has not yet been understood, a previous study using in vivo expression technology (IVET) revealed that the tolCV2 expression is specifically induced inside the host tissue, leading to the proposal of TolCV2 as a putative virulence factor of V. vulnificus (28). Thus, the regulation of tolCV2 by the CarRS TCS could be crucial for the survival and virulence of V. vulnificus in the host environment, but the details should be investigated in future studies. Altogether, the CarRS TCS, which highly activates the expression of the eptA and tolCV2 operons, could enhance not only the PMB resistance but also the pathogenicity of V. vulnificus during infection.
In general, a sensor kinase phosphorylates its cognate response regulator, and the phosphorylation of the response regulator induces structural change, facilitates dimerization, and in turn, increases DNA-binding affinity (29). Thus, only a phosphorylated response regulator is considered to bind to the regulatory region of the target gene and to modulate its expression. Similarly, CarS phosphorylates CarR, and the resulting CarR-P increases the expression of eptA and carR, as well as the resistance to PMB (Fig. 4). In addition, EMSAs and DNase I protection assays identified that CarR directly and specifically binds to the upstream regions of the eptA and carRS operons (Fig. 5 and 6). Interestingly, however, CarR does not require phosphorylation for DNA binding (Fig. 5C and D), indicating another role of CarR phosphorylation besides enhancing DNA-binding affinity. One possible explanation for the CarR-P-dependent gene regulation is that only CarR-P, and not CarR, interacts with RNA polymerase after DNA binding and then promotes transcription of the downstream genes. Indeed, a few response regulators, such as OmpR and BvgA, have been reported to bind DNA regardless of phosphorylation but to activate the target gene expression only when phosphorylated (30–32).
The PcarRS activity of V. vulnificus increases upon exposure to PMB and acidic pH, while it decreases in the presence of high levels of divalent cations and bile salts (Fig. 7). This indicates that the presence of PMB, low levels of the divalent cations, and acidic pH are environmental signals for the activation of the CarRS TCS, but the presence of bile salts is a signal for the inactivation of the CarRS TCS. Furthermore, CarR has a positive effect on not only the PMB resistance but also the survival at acidic pH, while exhibiting a negative effect on the survival in the presence of bile salts (Fig. 8). Thus, it is tempting to speculate that the CarRS TCS provides V. vulnificus with the benefit of surviving within the host by appropriately being activated or inactivated in response to each environmental signal. Our previous RNA-seq analyses showed that the expression of the carRS operon is downregulated upon exposure to nitric oxide (33) or murine blood (34). These results indicated that nitrosative stress or blood component(s) could be another signal for the inactivation of the CarRS TCS. Collectively, the CarRS TCS modulates its own state between activation and inactivation upon sensing multiple host-related signals in different niches, contributing to the pathogenesis of V. vulnificus.
In summary, the CarRS TCS of V. vulnificus, which is responsible for the PMB resistance, has been characterized. CarR activates the expression of the eptA and carRS operons by directly and specifically binding to their upstream regions, and CarR phosphorylation by CarS is important for the gene regulation. Notably, the CarRS TCS alters its activation state by responding to host-related stresses including PMB, divalent cations, bile salts, and pH change. Furthermore, CarR determines the resistance of V. vulnificus to bile salts and acidic pH among the stresses as well as PMB. Altogether, the CarRS TCS could contribute to the optimal fitness of V. vulnificus during infection by recognizing and responding to multiple host environmental signals.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Strains, plasmids, and culture conditions.
The strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table S2. Unless otherwise noted, the V. vulnificus strains were grown in Luria-Bertani medium supplemented with 2% (wt/vol) NaCl (LBS) at 30°C. When required, antibiotics were added to the medium at the following concentrations: ampicillin, 100 μg mL−1; kanamycin, 100 μg mL−1; and chloramphenicol, 3 μg mL−1. The growth of the V. vulnificus strains was monitored spectrophotometrically at 600 nm (A600). When indicated, overnight cultures of the V. vulnificus strains were diluted to an A600 of 0.01 and then used to inoculate LBS with or without PMB (10 μg mL−1).
Identification of V. vulnificus carR.
To identify genes responsible for the PMB resistance, a previously constructed random transposon mutant library of V. vulnificus was used (35). From the transposon mutants, a mutant exhibiting a decreased growth rate in LBS containing PMB (50 μg mL−1) was screened. A DNA fragment flanking the transposon insertion was amplified by PCR as described previously (36), and a search for homology between the sequence of the resulting fragment and the V. vulnificus MO6-24/O genome (GenBank assembly accession number GCF_000186585.1) singled out carR.
Generation and complementation of mutants.
For construction of isogenic deletion mutants, target genes were inactivated in vitro by deletion of each ORF using the PCR-mediated linker-scanning method as described previously (37). Briefly, appropriate pairs of primers were used for amplification of the deleted ORF fragment (Table S3), and the resulting fragment was ligated into SpeI-SphI-digested pDM4 (38). Escherichia coli S17-1 λpir containing pDM4 with the deleted ORF fragment was used as a conjugal donor to V. vulnificus MO6-24/O to generate each deletion mutant (Table S2). The conjugation and isolation of the transconjugants were conducted as described previously (39).
To complement the carR deletion, the carR ORF was amplified by CARRC-F and CARRC-R (Table S3). The resulting fragment was cloned into pJK1113 (40) under the arabinose-inducible promoter PBAD to generate pTY21091 (Table S2). pJK1113 and pTY21091 were transferred into the appropriate strains by conjugation as described above.
Transcriptome analysis and quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR).
The wild-type and ΔcarR strains with two biological replicates were grown to an A600 of 0.5, and the total RNAs were isolated using an RNeasy minikit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Strand-specific cDNA libraries were constructed and sequenced using HiSeq 2500 (Illumina, San Diego, CA) by CJ Bioscience (Seoul, South Korea) as described previously (41). The raw sequencing reads were mapped to the V. vulnificus MO6-24/O reference genome (GenBank assembly accession number GCF_000186585.1). The expression level of each gene was calculated as reads per kilobase of transcript per million mapped sequence reads (RPKM) using EDGE-pro (Estimated Degree of Gene Expression in PROkaryotes) version 1.3.1 (42). The RPKM values were normalized and analyzed statistically as described previously (43) to identify the differentially expressed genes (fold change ≥2 with adjusted P value <0.01).
For qRT-PCR, cDNA was synthesized from 500 ng of the total RNAs using PrimeScript RT master mix (TaKaRa, Tokyo, Japan). Real-time PCR amplification of the cDNA was performed using a CFX96 real-time PCR detection system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) with pairs of specific primers (Table S3) as described previously (44). The relative expression levels of the transcripts were calculated using the expression level of rrsH as an internal reference for normalization.
Antimicrobial susceptibility test.
The MICs of PMB in the V. vulnificus strains were determined by the broth microdilution method according to the CLSI (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute) guidelines (45). The MIC of PMB in E. coli ATCC 25922 was used as the quality control.
Construction of mutants producing CarRD55A and CarSH220A.
The D55 of CarR and the H220 of CarS were substituted with Ala to examine their role in CarR phosphorylation. The mutated carRD55A and carSH220A regions were constructed using the PCR-mediated linker-scanning method as described above. To construct the mutated carRD55A region, the mutagenic primers CARRPM-R1 and CARRPM-F2 were designed to carry the substitution of D55 of CarR (GAC) with Ala (GCT). Then, primer pairs CARRD-F1 and CARRPM-R1 and CARRPM-F2 and CARRD-R2 were used for amplification of the 5′ amplicon and 3′ amplicon of carRD55A, respectively (Table S3). Similarly, the mutagenic primers CARSPM-R1 and CARSPM-F2 were designed to carry the substitution of H220 of CarS (CAT) with Ala (GCT) to construct the mutated carSH220A region (Table S3). Then, primer pairs CARSD-F1 and CARSPM-R1 and CARSPM-F2 and CARSD-R2 were used for amplification of the 5′ amplicon and 3′ amplicon of carSH220A, respectively. The resulting 5′ amplicon and 3′ amplicon of either carRD55A or carSH220A were ligated into SpeI-SphI-digested pDM4 to generate pGR2101 or pGR2102. E. coli S17-1 λpir containing either pGR2101 or pGR2102 was used as a conjugal donor to the ΔcarR or ΔcarS strain to generate the carRD55A or carSH220A strain (Table S2). The conjugation and isolation of the transconjugants were conducted as described above.
Protein purification and Western blot analysis.
To overexpress CarR and CarRD55A, the carR and carRD55A genes were amplified by PCR using CARRP-F and CARRP-R from the wild-type and carRD55A strains, respectively (Table S3). Each resulting fragment was cloned into pET-28a(+) (Novagen, Madison, WI) to generate pTY21092 and pDH2214 (Table S2). The His6-tagged CarR and CarRD55A were expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3) and purified by affinity chromatography (Qiagen). The purified His6-tagged CarR was used to raise mouse anti-CarR polyclonal antibody (AbClon, Seoul, South Korea).
For Western blot analysis, the V. vulnificus cells were harvested by centrifugation and lysed using B-PER bacterial protein extraction reagent with enzymes (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). After removal of the cell debris by centrifugation, the protein levels of CarR and DnaK were detected using mouse anti-V. vulnificus CarR antibody and mouse anti-E. coli DnaK antibody (Enzo Life Science, Farmingdale, NY, USA) as described previously (46). The phosphorylated CarR was separated from the unphosphorylated CarR using 10% SuperSep Phos-tag SDS-PAGE gel (Wako, Osaka, Japan) (47). The cellular levels of CarR-P and CarRtotal were quantified using Image Lab software (Bio-Rad).
EMSAs and DNase I protection assays.
For EMSA, the 500-bp DNA fragment of the upstream region of the eptA operon was amplified by PCR using unlabeled PEPTA-F and 6-carboxyfluorescein (6-FAM)-labeled PEPTA-R as the primers (Table S3). Similarly, the 375-bp DNA fragment of the upstream region of the carRS operon was amplified by PCR using unlabeled PCARR-F and 6-FAM-labeled PCARR-R as the primers (Table S3). Each 6-FAM-labeled DNA probe was incubated with different amounts of purified His6-tagged CarR or CarRD55A for 30 min at 25°C in a 20-μL reaction mixture containing 1× CarR binding buffer (40 mM Tris-Cl [pH 8.0], 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol [DTT], 100 μM EDTA, 0.1 μg μL−1 bovine serum albumin [BSA]) and 0.05 μg of poly(dI-dC) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). For competition analysis, the same but unlabeled DNA probe was used as a self-competitor. Electrophoretic analyses of the protein-DNA complexes were performed as described previously (48).
For the DNase I protection assay, the same 6-FAM-labeled DNA probes for the upstream regions of the eptA and carRS operons were used. Each 6-FAM-labeled DNA probe was incubated with His6-tagged CarR for 30 min at 25°C in a 20-μL reaction mixture containing 1× CarR binding buffer and 0.05 μg of poly(dI-dC) (Sigma-Aldrich). The CarR-DNA complexes were digested with DNase I as described previously (34). The digested DNA products were precipitated with ethanol, eluted in distilled water, and analyzed using an ABI 3730xl DNA analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) with Peak Scanner software version 1.0 (Applied Biosystems).
Construction of the PcarRS-luxCDABE transcriptional fusion.
The 371-bp carR upstream region (positions from −314 to +57 relative to the first base of the ORF for carR) was amplified using primer pair PcarRX-F and PcarRX-R (Table S3) and fused to SacI-SpeI-digested pBBR-lux carrying the promoterless luxCDABE genes to generate pDH2207 (Table S2) (49). pDH2207 was transferred into the V. vulnificus strains by conjugation as described above. Each strain was grown to an A600 of 0.5, and its cellular luminescence and growth (A600) were monitored using a Tecan Spark microplate reader (Tecan, Mannedorf, Switzerland) upon exposure to various host-related stresses: PMB (1 μg mL−1), CaCl2 (10 mM), MgCl2 (10 mM), bile salts (0.03%), and acidic pH (pH 5.7). Relative luminescence units (RLUs) were calculated by dividing the luminescence by the A600 (41).
Viability assay.
The viability of the V. vulnificus strains under host environmental stresses was determined by the spot plating method. To measure the growth under different Mg2+ levels, the V. vulnificus strains grown overnight in LBS were diluted 1:100 in M9 minimal medium containing 2 mM or 50 μM MgSO4 and further incubated for 9 h. To measure the effect of bile salts or acidic pH on growth, the V. vulnificus strains grown to an A600 of 0.5 were further incubated in LBS containing 0.08% (wt/vol) bile salts or LBS adjusted to pH 4.7 for 2 h. Equal volumes of the V. vulnificus strains were serially 10-fold diluted, plated onto LBS agar, and incubated for 14 h. When indicated, the numbers of the surviving V. vulnificus cells were enumerated at each time point.
Data analysis.
Average values and standard deviations (SD) were calculated from at least three independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed with Student’s t test using GraphPad Prism 7.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA).
Data availability.
All raw transcriptome data have been deposited in the NCBI BioProject database under accession number PRJNA905907.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (grant No. 2023R1A2C1002968 to S.H.C.), the Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science and Technology Development (project No. PJ016298 to S.H.C.), Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea, and the Creative-Pioneering Researchers Program through Seoul National University to Y.-J.B.
Footnotes
Supplemental material is available online only.
Contributor Information
Ye-Ji Bang, Email: yeji.bang@snu.ac.kr.
Sang Ho Choi, Email: choish@snu.ac.kr.
Sandeep Tamber, Health Canada.
REFERENCES
- 1.Stock AM, Robinson VL, Goudreau PN. 2000. Two-component signal transduction. Annu Rev Biochem 69:183–215. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.69.1.183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Beier D, Gross R. 2006. Regulation of bacterial virulence by two-component systems. Curr Opin Microbiol 9:143–152. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2006.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Mitrophanov AY, Groisman EA. 2008. Signal integration in bacterial two-component regulatory systems. Genes Dev 22:2601–2611. doi: 10.1101/gad.1700308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Giannella RA, Zamcheck N, Broitman SA. 1972. Gastric acid barrier to ingested microorganisms in man: studies in vivo and in vitro. Gut 13:251–256. doi: 10.1136/gut.13.4.251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gunn JS. 2000. Mechanisms of bacterial resistance and response to bile. Microbes Infect 2:907–913. doi: 10.1016/s1286-4579(00)00392-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hancock REW, Diamond G. 2000. The role of cationic antimicrobial peptides in innate host defences. Trends Microbiol 8:402–410. doi: 10.1016/s0966-842x(00)01823-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ganz T. 2003. Defensins: antimicrobial peptides of innate immunity. Nat Rev Immunol 3:710–720. doi: 10.1038/nri1180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.De Smet K, Contreras R. 2005. Human antimicrobial peptides: defensins, cathelicidins and histatins. Biotechnol Lett 27:1337–1347. doi: 10.1007/s10529-005-0936-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Warner DM, Levy SB. 2010. Different effects of transcriptional regulators MarA, SoxS and Rob on susceptibility of Escherichia coli to cationic antimicrobial peptides (CAMPs): Rob-dependent CAMP induction of the marRAB operon. Microbiology (Reading) 156:570–578. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.033415-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zavascki AP, Goldani LZ, Li J, Nation RL. 2007. Polymyxin B for the treatment of multidrug-resistant pathogens: a critical review. J Antimicrob Chemother 60:1206–1215. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkm357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Storm DR, Rosenthal KS, Swanson PE. 1977. Polymyxin and related peptide antibiotics. Annu Rev Biochem 46:723–763. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.46.070177.003451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bilecen K, Fong JCN, Cheng A, Jones CJ, Zamorano-Sanchez D, Yildiz FH. 2015. Polymyxin B Resistance and biofilm formation in Vibrio cholerae are controlled by the response regulator CarR. Infect Immun 83:1199–1209. doi: 10.1128/IAI.02700-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Herrera CM, Crofts AA, Henderson JC, Pingali SC, Davies BW, Trent MS. 2014. The Vibrio cholerae VprA-VprB two-component system controls virulence through endotoxin modification. mBio 5:e02283-14. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02283-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hankins JV, Madsen JA, Giles DK, Brodbelt JS, Trent MS. 2012. Amino acid addition to Vibrio cholerae LPS establishes a link between surface remodeling in Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:8722–8727. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1201313109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Liu YT, Xu TT, Wang Q, Huang JX, Zhu YF, Liu XM, Liu RY, Yang B, Zhou K. 2022. Vibrio cholerae senses human enteric alpha-defensin 5 through a CarSR two-component system to promote bacterial pathogenicity. Commun Biol 5:559. doi: 10.1038/s42003-022-03525-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Oliver JD. 2015. The biology of Vibrio vulnificus. Microbiol Spectr 3:3.3.01. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.VE-0001-2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Choi G, Choi SH. 2022. Complex regulatory networks of virulence factors in Vibrio vulnificus. Trends Microbiol 30:1205–1216. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2022.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Phillips KE, Satchell KJ. 2017. Vibrio vulnificus: from oyster colonist to human pathogen. PLoS Pathog 13:e1006053. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bier N, Schwartz K, Guerra B, Strauch E. 2015. Survey on antimicrobial resistance patterns in Vibrio vulnificus and Vibrio cholerae non-O1/non-O139 in Germany reveals carbapenemase-producing Vibrio cholerae in coastal waters. Front Microbiol 6:1179. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Massad G, Oliver JD. 1987. New selective and differential medium for Vibrio cholerae and Vibrio vulnificus. Appl Environ Microbiol 53:2262–2264. doi: 10.1128/aem.53.9.2262-2264.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lee M, Kim HL, Song S, Joo M, Lee S, Kim D, Hahn Y, Ha NC, Lee K. 2013. The alpha-barrel tip region of Escherichia coli TolC homologs of Vibrio vulnificus interacts with the MacA protein to form the functional macrolide-specific efflux pump MacAB-TolC. J Microbiol 51:154–159. doi: 10.1007/s12275-013-2699-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhang HM, Srinivas S, Xu YC, Wei WH, Feng YJ. 2019. Genetic and biochemical mechanisms for bacterial lipid A modifiers associated with polymyxin resistance. Trends Biochem Sci 44:973–988. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2019.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Puja H, Bolard A, Nogues A, Plesiat P, Jeannot K. 2020. The efflux pump MexXY/OprM contributes to the tolerance and acquired resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to colistin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 64:e02033-19. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02033-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lister IM, Raftery C, Mecsas J, Levy SB. 2012. Yersinia pestis acrAB-tolC in antibiotic resistance and virulence. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:1120–1123. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05338-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Samantha A, Vrielink A. 2020. Lipid A phosphoethanolamine transferase: regulation, structure and immune response. J Mol Biol 432:5184–5196. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2020.04.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Herrera CM, Henderson JC, Crofts AA, Trent MS. 2017. Novel coordination of lipopolysaccharide modifications in Vibrio cholerae promotes CAMP resistance. Mol Microbiol 106:582–596. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Tan X, Qiao J, Zhou Q, Huang DY, Li HD, Wang JL, Wang XY. 2021. Identification of a phosphoethanolamine transferase for lipid A modification in Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Food Control 125:108033. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lee KE, Bang JS, Baek CH, Park DK, Hwang W, Choi SH, Kim KS. 2007. IVET-based identification of virulence factors in Vibrio vulnificus MO6-24/O. J Microbiol Biotechnol 17:234–243. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zschiedrich CP, Keidel V, Szurmant H. 2016. Molecular mechanisms of two-component signal transduction. J Mol Biol 428:3752–3775. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.08.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Huang KJ, Lan CY, Igo MM. 1997. Phosphorylation stimulates the cooperative DNA-binding properties of the transcription factor OmpR. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:2828–2832. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.7.2828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bergstrom LC, Qin L, Harlocker SL, Egger LA, Inouye M. 1998. Hierarchical and co-operative binding of OmpR to a fusion construct containing the ompC and ompF upstream regulatory sequences of Escherichia coli. Genes Cells 3:777–788. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2443.1998.00228.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Cotter PA, Jones AM. 2003. Phosphorelay control of virulence gene expression in Bordetella. Trends Microbiol 11:367–373. doi: 10.1016/s0966-842x(03)00156-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kim D, Na EJ, Kim S, Kim JS, Jung YH, Cao J, Han HJ, Bang IS, Yoo JW, Ha NC, Choi SH. 2019. Transcriptomic identification and biochemical characterization of HmpA, a nitric oxide dioxygenase, essential for pathogenesis of Vibrio vulnificus. Front Microbiol 10:2208. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Choi G, Jang KK, Lim JG, Lee ZW, Im H, Choi SH. 2020. The transcriptional regulator IscR integrates host-derived nitrosative stress and iron starvation in activation of the vvhBA operon in Vibrio vulnificus. J Biol Chem 295:5350–5361. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA120.012724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lim JG, Choi SH. 2014. IscR is a global regulator essential for pathogenesis of Vibrio vulnificus and induced by host cells. Infect Immun 82:569–578. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01141-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lee BC, Lee JH, Kim MW, Kim BS, Oh MH, Kim KS, Kim TS, Choi SH. 2008. Vibrio vulnificus rtxE is important for virulence, and its expression is induced by exposure to host cells. Infect Immun 76:1509–1517. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01503-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lee H, Im H, Hwang SH, Ko D, Choi SH. 2023. Two novel genes identified by large-scale transcriptomic analysis are essential for biofilm and rugose colony development of Vibrio vulnificus. PLoS Pathog 19:e1011064. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1011064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Milton DL, O’Toole R, Horstedt P, Wolf-Watz H. 1996. Flagellin A is essential for the virulence of Vibrio anguillarum. J Bacteriol 178:1310–1319. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.5.1310-1319.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hwang SH, Park JH, Lee B, Choi SH. 2020. A regulatory network controls cabABC expression leading to biofilm and rugose colony development in Vibrio vulnificus. Front Microbiol 10:3063. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.03063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Lim JG, Bang YJ, Choi SH. 2014. Characterization of the Vibrio vulnificus 1-Cys peroxiredoxin Prx3 and regulation of its expression by the Fe-S cluster regulator IscR in response to oxidative stress and iron starvation. J Biol Chem 289:36263–36274. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.611020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lee ZW, Kim BS, Jang KK, Bang YJ, Kim S, Ha NC, Jung YH, Lee HJ, Han HJ, Kim JS, Kim J, Sahu PK, Jeong LS, Kim MH, Choi SH. 2019. Small-molecule inhibitor of HlyU attenuates virulence of Vibrio species. Sci Rep 9:4346. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39554-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. 2014. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 15:550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Hwang SH, Im H, Choi SH. 2021. A master regulator BrpR coordinates the expression of multiple loci for robust biofilm and rugose colony development in Vibrio vulnificus. Front Microbiol 12:679854. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.679854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Jang KK, Lee ZW, Kim B, Jung YH, Han HJ, Kim MH, Kim BS, Choi SH. 2017. Identification and characterization of Vibrio vulnificus plpA encoding a phospholipase A(2) essential for pathogenesis. J Biol Chem 292:17129–17143. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M117.791657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.CLSI. 2012. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically, approved standard, 9th ed. M07-A9. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Lee ZW, Hwang SH, Choi G, Jang KK, Lee TH, Chung KM, Kim BS, Choi SH. 2020. A MARTX toxin rtxA gene is controlled by host environmental signals through a CRP-coordinated regulatory network in Vibrio vulnificus. mBio 11:e00723-20. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00723-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ko D, Choi SH. 2021. Comparative genomics reveals an SNP potentially leading to phenotypic diversity of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis. Microb Genom 7:000572. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Ko D, Choi SH. 2022. Mechanistic understanding of antibiotic resistance mediated by EnvZ/OmpR two-component system in Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis. J Antimicrob Chemother 77:2419–2428. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkac223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Lenz DH, Mok KC, Lilley BN, Kulkarni RV, Wingreen NS, Bassler BL. 2004. The small RNA chaperone Hfq and multiple small RNAs control quorum sensing in Vibrio harveyi and Vibrio cholerae. Cell 118:69–82. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All raw transcriptome data have been deposited in the NCBI BioProject database under accession number PRJNA905907.