Skip to main content
Microbiology Spectrum logoLink to Microbiology Spectrum
. 2023 Jun 26;11(4):e01439-23. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01439-23

Virome Analysis Provides an Insight into the Viral Community of Chinese Mitten Crab Eriocheir sinensis

Guangyu Guo a,b,#, Muhua Wang a,b,c,#, Dandan Zhou a,b, Xinyi He c, Peiyun Han c, Gongrui Chen c, Jiamin Zeng c, Zhi Liu a, Yinqing Wu c, Shaoping Weng b,c,, Jianguo He a,b,c,
Editor: Biao Hed
PMCID: PMC10433957  PMID: 37358426

ABSTRACT

Recent advances in viromics have led to the discovery of a great diversity of RNA viruses and the identification of a large number of viral pathogens. A systematic exploration of viruses in Chinese mitten crab (Eriocheir sinensis), one of the most important aquatic commercial species, is still lacking. Here, we characterized the RNA viromes of asymptomatic, milky disease (MD)-affected, and hepatopancreatic necrosis syndrome (HPNS)-affected Chinese mitten crabs collected from 3 regions in China. In total, we identified 31 RNA viruses belonging to 11 orders, 22 of which were first reported here. By comparing viral composition between samples, we observed high variation in viral communities across regions, with most of the viral species being region-specific. We proposed to establish several novel viral families or genera based on the phylogenetic relationships and genome structures of viruses discovered in this study, expanding our knowledge of viral diversity in brachyuran crustaceans.

IMPORTANCE High-throughput sequencing and meta-transcriptomic analysis provide us with an efficient tool to discover unknown viruses and explore the composition of viral communities in specific species. In this study, we investigated viromes in asymptomatic and diseased Chinese mitten crabs collected from three distant locations. We observed high regional variation in the composition of viral species, highlighting the importance of multi-location sampling. In addition, we classified several novel and ICTV-unclassified viruses based on their genome structures and phylogenetic relationships, providing a new perspective on current viral taxa.

KEYWORDS: Eriocheir sinensis, virome, virus taxonomy, milky disease, hepatopancreatic necrosis syndrome

INTRODUCTION

Viruses are the most abundant and diverse biological entities on earth. The virome, the assemblage of viruses associated with a particular ecological niche or organism, is vast and heterogeneous (1). However, the nature and structure of viral communities were mostly unappreciated until the development of high-throughput sequencing techniques and metagenomic analysis approaches. Many novel viruses, especially RNA viruses, have been described and characterized through virome analysis using next-generation sequencing (26). Virome analysis can detect DNA and RNA viruses with high sensitivity and low stochastic error derived from the relative abundance of viromic taxa (7, 8). Therefore, virome analysis has been widely applied in human, animal, and environmental samples to detect novel viruses and investigate the composition of viral populations (1, 915).

Viruses are found in all types of organisms and their community states can be associated with adverse outcomes for their hosts (1). Viral infection causes multiple physiological and behavioral symptoms and even death in brachyuran crustaceans (16, 17). For example, infection with Scylla serrata reovirus SZ-2007 (also called “mud crab virus,” MCRV) leads to a high mortality rate of up to 100% in mud crabs (Scylla serrata) (18). The analysis of viromes can also be used to uncover potential pathogens and monitor the distribution of viral pathogens (12, 1921). However, although multi-location sampling is common in viromic studies for both the discovery of novel viruses and the surveillance of viral pathogens (4, 12, 15, 20, 22), few studies have investigated how viral species composition in the same animal species varies in different locations.

The Chinese mitten crab, Eriocheir sinensis H. Milne Edwards 1853, is one of the most important aquatic commercial species. The freshwater aquaculture production of Chinese mitten crab makes up 6.9% of global crustacean aquaculture production (23). The incidence of disease outbreaks has increased with the expanding aquaculture industry of Chinese mitten crab. “Milky disease” (MD), named after the milky hemolymph of sick crabs, causes clinical signs in infected crabs, including weakness, opaque or whitish muscles, milky hemolymph, and subsequent death due to organ failure (24). Another disease affecting crabs, called hepatopancreatic necrosis syndrome (HPNS, also called hepatopancreatic necrosis disease), causes multiple symptoms, including a weak response to stimulation, reduced preening activity and locomotion, muscle atrophy and edema, empty stomachs and intestines, and white focal patches in the hepatopancreas (25, 26). The mortality rates of MD and HPNS are >20% and >40%, respectively (24, 25). The epidemic of MD and HPNS has significantly injured the Chinese mitten crab aquaculture industry and led to marked economic loss.

Here, we investigated the RNA viromes in pooled samples of MD-affected, HPNS-affected, and asymptomatic Chinese mitten crabs collected from three regions in China. We compared and investigated the viral composition in crabs from different regions, as well as the relative abundance of viral species between samples from diseased and asymptomatic crabs. Additionally, we proposed to establish several novel families and genera and reconstruct the taxonomy of specific families based on phylogenetic analyses of newly discovered viruses. Our results reveal a great diversity of viruses in Chinese mitten crabs and expand our knowledge of viral communities in crabs.

RESULTS

Virome overview.

Sixty diseased or asymptomatic Chinese mitten crabs collected from three regions of China were divided into 6 pools based on their health status and sampling locations (Fig. 1A; Table 1). We identified crabs with MD based on clinical symptoms, including milky hemolymph filling the carapace and gills, albescent hepatopancreas, and inactive behavior (Fig. 1C). Crabs with atrophic hepatopancreas and muscles, transparent hemolymph, and inactive behavior were identified as having HPNS (Fig. 1D). To increase the viral abundance, the hepatopancreas, gills, and muscles of 10 crabs with MD (TS-MD) and 10 asymptomatic crabs (TS-Asym) collected from Tangshan, Hebei Province were pooled to construct sequencing libraries. In addition, sequencing libraries were constructed using the hepatopancreas, gills, and muscles of 10 crabs with HPNS (DY-HPNS) and 10 asymptomatic crabs (DY-Asym) from Dongying, Shandong Province. The hepatopancreas, gills, and muscles of 10 crabs with HPNS (SQ-HPNS) and 10 asymptomatic crabs (SQ-Asym) collected from Suqian, Jiangsu Province, were also pooled to construct sequencing libraries.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Sampling locations and conditions of crab samples. (A) Map of sampling locations. (B) Asymptomatic crab. (C) Symptoms of MD-infected crab. Arrows indicate the milky hemolymph and albescent hepatopancreas of diseased crab. (D) Symptoms of HPNS-infected crab. Arrows indicate atrophic hepatopancreas and transparent hemolymph.

TABLE 1.

Overview of 6 sequencing poolsa

Condition Sampling
Crabs (n) RNA library Raw
Clean
Location Date (mo/day/year) Bases (Gb) Reads (M) Bases (Gb) Reads (M)
Milky disease Tangshan 4/18/2021 10 TS-MD 10.71 71.40 9.65 69.50
Asymptomatic Tangshan 4/18/2021 10 TS-Asym 11.91 79.43 11.05 77.20
HPNS Dongying 8/13/2021 10 DY-HPNS 11.78 78.53 10.10 76.11
Asymptomatic Dongying 8/13/2021 10 DY-Asym 10.53 70.19 9.30 68.41
HPNS Suqian 10/22/2021 10 SQ-HPNS 25.10 167.35 19.39 159.98
Asymptomatic Suqian 10/22/2021 10 SQ-Asym 10.74 71.62 8.20 68.76
a

MD, milky disease; HPNS, hepatopancreatic necrosis syndrome; TS, Tangshan (Hebei Province); DY, Dongying (Shandong Province); SQ, Suqian (Jiangsu Province).

In total, 80.77 Gb of Illumina reads were generated for 6 RNA sequencing libraries. A total of 483,997 contigs were obtained by de novo assembling the trimmed Illumina reads from each library, with 394 of them identified as viral sequences. We found 31 viruses from these 394 viral contigs (Table 2). These RNA viruses belonged to the orders Reovirales, Bunyavirales, Hepelivirales, Martellivirales, Amarillovirales, Nodamuvirales, Tolivirales, Timlovirales, Ourlivirales, Picornavirales, and Sobelivirales based on their sequence similarity, genome structure, and phylogenetic relationships (Fig. 2). Notably, 22 of these 31 viruses are reported for the first time here. The genomes of 4 viruses were assembled more completely in this study than in previous reports.

TABLE 2.

Viruses identified in this study

Virus name GenBank accession no. Genome type Genome length (bp) Order Family
Eriocheir sinensis reovirus 1 OP019112OP019124 dsRNA 20,180 Reovirales Sedoreoviridae
Eriocheir sinensis reovirus 2 OP019125 dsRNA 4,486 Reovirales Spinareoviridae
Eriocheir sinensis reovirus 3 KP638402KP638413 dsRNA 23,913 Reovirales Sedoreoviridae
Chinese mitten crab virus 1 MH717874MH717876 –ssRNA 10,793 Bunyavirales Cruliviridae
Eriocheir sinensis bunyavirus OP019095 –ssRNA 12,238 Bunyavirales
Eriocheir sinensis alphatetra-like virus OP019089 +ssRNA 10,673 Hepelivirales
Hubei sediment virgavirus 2 MW897259 +ssRNA 6,916 Martellivirales Virgaviridae
Eriocheir sinensis kita-like virus OP019101 +ssRNA 12,933 Martellivirales
Eriocheir sinensis cholera-like virus OP019096 +ssRNA 18,830 Amarillovirales Flaviviridae
Eriocheir sinensis nodavirus 1 OP019107 +ssRNA 3,087 Nodamuvirales Nodaviridae
Eriocheir sinensis nodavirus 2 OP019108 +ssRNA 3,018 Nodamuvirales Nodaviridae
Eriocheir sinensis noda-like virus OP019106 +ssRNA 4,802 Nodamuvirales
Eriocheir sinensis tombusvirus 1 OP019131 +ssRNA 4,861 Tolivirales Tombusviridae
Eriocheir sinensis tombusvirus 2 OP019132 +ssRNA 4,283 Tolivirales Tombusviridae
Eriocheir sinensis blumevirus 1 OP019090 +ssRNA 5,266 Timlovirales Blumeviridae
Eriocheir sinensis blumevirus 2 OP019091 +ssRNA 3,514 Timlovirales Blumeviridae
Eriocheir sinensis botourmia-like virus 1 OP019092 +ssRNA 3,493 Ourlivirales Botourmiaviridae
Eriocheir sinensis botourmia-like virus 2 OP019093 +ssRNA 3,404 Ourlivirales Botourmiaviridae
Eriocheir sinensis dicistrovirus 1 OP019098 +ssRNA 7,577 Picornavirales Dicistroviridae
Eriocheir sinensis dicistrovirus 2 OP019099 +ssRNA 7,116 Picornavirales Dicistroviridae
Eriocheir sinensis dicistro-like virus OP019097 +ssRNA 9,308 Picornavirales
Shahe arthropod virus 1 KX883988 +ssRNA 9,289 Picornavirales
Eriocheir sinensis iflavirus 1 OP019100 +ssRNA 3,596 Picornavirales Iflaviridae
Eriocheir sinensis marnavirus 1 OP019102 +ssRNA 8,832 Picornavirales Marnaviridae
Eriocheir sinensis marnavirus 2 OP019103 +ssRNA 8,634 Picornavirales Marnaviridae
Eriocheir sinensis marnavirus 3 OP019104 +ssRNA 8,142 Picornavirales Marnaviridae
Eriocheir sinensis marnavirus 4 OP019105 +ssRNA 7,809 Picornavirales Marnaviridae
Shahe picorna-like virus 13 KX883657 +ssRNA 9,077 Picornavirales
Eriocheir sinensis picorna-like virus OP019111 +ssRNA 8,297 Picornavirales
Eriocheir sinensis sobemo-like virus 1 OP019126 +ssRNA 3,124 Sobelivirales
Eriocheir sinensis sobemo-like virus 2 OP019127 +ssRNA 3,046 Sobelivirales

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Overview of the RNA virome in Chinese mitten crab. (A) Number of RNA viruses in viral orders. (B) Abundance of viruses in each library. The relative abundance of viruses in each library was calculated and normalized by the number of fragments per kilobase of exon per million fragments mapped (FPKM).

To verify the presence of RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) genes, we used the original samples for reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and nested RT-PCR with primer sets designed based on the RdRp sequences of viral genomes (Table S1 in the supplemental material). The products of RT-PCR were confirmed by Sanger sequencing. To ensure that our assembled viral genomes were not chimeric sequences, we aligned filtered Illumina reads to the genomes and calculated the genome coverage of reads as well as the heterozygosity of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). The extremely high genome coverage (>99.5%) and low heterozygosity (<0.5%) indicate that our assemblies were not chimeric sequences and were high-quality (Table S2).

Variations of viral composition among samples.

There was large variation in the virus composition in Chinese mitten crab collected from the three sampling locations, which are separated from each other by at least 200 km (Fig. 3A and B). Most of the viruses (26/31, 80.6%) were region-specific. Eriocheir sinensis bunyavirus (EsBV) was found in the sequencing libraries of all sampling locations at high abundance, making up more than 70% of the viral reads in each library (Fig. 2B).

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Variation in virus composition among sampling locations and crab conditions. (A) Venn plot of the number of RNA viruses in different sampling locations. (B) Venn plot of the number of RNA viruses in asymptomatic crabs collected from three sampling locations. (C) Comparison of relative abundance of viral orders in asymptomatic and MD-infected crabs collected from Tangshan, Hebei Province. (D) Comparison of relative abundance of viral orders in asymptomatic and HPNS-infected crabs collected from Tangshan, Hebei Province and Suqian, Jiangsu Province. Relative abundance of viral orders in each library was calculated and normalized by the number of mapped reads per million total reads (RPM).

The relative abundance of viruses was compared between diseased and asymptomatic crab samples. The relative abundance of 13 viruses was higher in MD-affected crabs than in asymptomatic crabs collected in Tangshan (Fig. 2B). The orders Martellivirales, Tolivirales, and Sobelivirales were abundant in MD-affected crabs, but showed a very low relative abundance in asymptomatic crabs (Fig. 3C). Six viruses showed a higher relative abundance in HPNS-affected crabs than in asymptomatic crabs collected in Dongying, and 6 viruses showed a higher relative abundance in HPNS-affected crabs than in asymptomatic crabs in Suqian (Fig. 2B). In the crabs with HPNS, only the order Sobelivirales was much more abundant than in asymptomatic crabs in the samples collected from Dongying, and the orders Amarillovirales and Martellivirales were much more abundant in HPNS-affected crabs than in asymptomatic crabs in the samples collected from Suqian (Fig. 3D). No viruses were found to have higher abundance in HPNS-affected crabs than in asymptomatic crabs from both Dongying and Suqian, suggesting that viruses may not be the main cause of HPNS.

Double-stranded RNA virus.

Three double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) viruses found in this study belonged to the order Reovirales. Eriocheir sinensis reovirus isolate 905 (EsRV905) and Eriocheir sinensis reovirus isolate 816 (EsRV816) were both first reported in 2002 (2729). Eriocheir sinensis reovirus strain WX-2012 (EsRV WX-2012) was first reported in 2015 (30). These three viruses were all named Eriocheir sinensis reovirus (EsRV) but showed no significant similarity with each other. Only EsRV905 has been accepted as a viral species of the genus Cardoreovirus, family Sedoreoviridae, by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) (31). EsRV816 and EsRV WX-2012 have been proposed to be classified into the two novel genera “Crustareovirus” and “Carbreovirus,” respectively (32). Our phylogenetic result supported this proposal (Fig. S1). To prevent researchers from mistaking them for the same species, we propose to retain ESRV isolate 915 as Eriocheir sinensis reovirus, but rename ESRV isolate 816 to Eriocheir sinensis reovirus 2 (EsRV2) and ESRV strain WX-2012 to Eriocheir sinensis reovirus 3 (EsRV3).

Incomplete genome segments encoding part of RdRp have been previously reported for EsRV (GenBank accession no. AY542965) and EsRV2 (EF508130). We assembled a more complete genome of EsRV that consisted of 12 segments. The fifth segment of EsRV was not fully assembled, causing this segment to be divided into two fragments. EsRV was closely related to Callinectes sapidus reovirus 2 (CsRV2, GenBank accession no. MW208677 to MW208688). A previous study proposed that the genome of EsRV2 had 10 segments, but only a complete segment encoding RdRp (4,488 bp) was found in our assembled contigs (29).

Negative-sense single-stranded RNA virus.

Two negative-sense single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) viruses belonging to the order Bunyavirales were identified in this study. Chinese mitten crab virus 1 (GenBank accession no. MH717874 to MH717876), which was reported in 2019 and accepted by ICTV as a member of the family Cruliviridae in order Bunyavirales in 2020, was found in pools TS-MD and TS-Asym (33, 34). A novel bunyavirus sequence (12,238 bp in length), Eriocheir sinensis bunyavirus (EsBV), was discovered and dominated in all 6 sampling pools. Most of the viral families within Bunyavirales have genomes composed of multiple linear single-stranded segments (2 to 8 segments), except for members of the new family Tulasviridae which have a genome composed of a single large molecule of negative-sense RNA (~12 kb) encoding three open reading frames (ORFs) (35, 36). However, EsBV has a non-segmented genome of more than 12,000 nucleotides (nt) in length with only one ORF containing a predicted RdRp domain (Fig. 4), unlike the genome organization of other families in Bunyavirales. A phylogenetic tree constructed using the conserved RdRp domain showed that EsBV, SBlV3, and SBlV4 clustered together and formed a divergent clade with a long branch, sister to the families Wupedeviridae and Nairoviridae (Fig. S2). EsBV shared 25.7% amino acid identity with Shahe bunya-like virus 3 (SBlV3) and 24.9% with Shahe bunya-like virus 4 (SBlV4). The unique genome organization of EsBV and its low sequence similarity with SBlV3 and SBlV4 suggested that EsBV is a novel virus. The phylogenetic result and distinct genome organization of EsBV indicated the possibility of establishing a novel family in the order Bunyavirales. However, there are some difficulties in the establishment of this novel family, mainly because EsBV and its relatives have no obvious common features, and further taxonomic research is needed in the future.

FIG 4.

FIG 4

Genome organization of viruses identified in this study. Genome organization of 31 viruses found in this study is shown. Predicted regions that encode major functional proteins or domains are labeled with color boxes. CP, coat protein; Hel, helicase; MP, movement protein; MTase, methyltransferase; NADAR, NAD and ADP-ribose; Pro, protease; RdRp, RNA-dependent RNA polymerase.

Positive-sense ssRNA virus.

Twenty-six positive-sense ssRNA viruses belonging to the orders Hepelivirales, Martellivirales, Amarillovirales, Nodamuvirales, Tolivirales, Timlovirales, Ourlivirales, Picornavirales, and Sobelivirales were identified in this study. Many of the viruses we found have different genome organizations compared to current ICTV-accepted members and independently clustered outside present genera or families in our phylogenetic trees. For these viruses, we preliminarily propose to establish novel genera or families mainly based on their phylogenetic results and genome organization.

(i) Virus in the order Hepelivirales. A viral sequence related to the family Alphatetraviridae in the order Hepelivirales, tentatively named Eriocheir sinensis alphatetra-like virus (EsAlV), was mainly discovered in the pool TS-Asym. EsAlV possessed a non-segmented genome with 10,673 nt encoding five ORFs (Fig. 4), different from the genome organization of four families of Hepelivirales (3740). The 5′ ORF was longest and predicted to contain a methyltransferase domain, helicase domain, and RdRp domain. Four 3′-proximal ORFs (ORFs 2 to 5) were relatively short, and ORF3 was predicted to encode a coat protein domain. Phylogenetic analysis using the RdRp revealed that EsAlV formed a clade with previously described unclassified viruses that was sister to the family Alphatetraviridae (Fig. S3). EsAlV shared 44.3% amino acid identity with Shahe hepe-like virus 2, which was the most closely related virus to EsAlV, indicating that EsAlV was a novel virus. The distinct genome structure of EsAlV and the long branch length of the clade containing EsAlV suggested that EsAlV may belong to a novel family in the order Hepelivirales. We propose to establish a novel family named “Pcahviridae” in Hepelivirales. This name was derived from the contraction of its characteristics, being a polycistronic, aquatic, hepe-like virus.

(ii) Viruses in the order Martellivirales. A kita-like viral sequence 12,933 bp in length, tentatively named Eriocheir sinensis kita-like virus (EsKlV), was discovered in this study. Current members of the family Kitaviridae have multiple segments (2 to 4 segments) and were considered to affect plants (41). Phylogenetic analysis revealed that EsKlV clustered with Sanxia atyid shrimp virus 1 (SASV1) and Beihai anemone virus 1 (BAV1) and fell within the family Kitaviridae (Fig. S4). EsKlV shared low amino acid identities with SASV1 (26.3%) and BAV1 (36.2%), suggesting that it may be a novel viral species in Kitaviridae. However, EsKlV was monopartite, and its genome contained 3 ORFs encoding 7 types of domains in total (Fig. 4). EsKlV and its closely related viruses BAV1 and Erysiphe necator associated virga-like virus 1 showed multiple host types, including crustaceans, anthozoans, and fungi. The genome organization and host range of EsKlV were significantly distinct from those of current members of Kitaviridae. Previous studies have found a number of invertebrate-infecting viruses closely related to members of Kitaviridae and suggested that members of Kitaviridae may primarily be arthropod/invertebrate viruses capable of limited spread in plant tissues, because most kitaviruses produce non-systemic infection (4145). The discovery of EsKlV and its relatives reinforced the concept that Kitaviridae may be a family of invertebrate-infecting viruses. Additionally, based on the distinct genome organization and phylogenetic result, we propose to place EsKlV and its similar viruses in the new genus “Monokitavirus” in Kitaviridae. This name was derived because EsKlV is a monopartite kita-like virus.

(iii) Viruses in the order Amarillovirales. Flaviviridae is a family of positive-sense RNA viruses that have non-segmented genomes of approximately 9 to 13 kb and affect mammals (46). A partial genome of Eriocheir sinensis cholera-like virus (EsClV, GenBank accession no. KM405246, 2,018 bp) closely related to members of the family Flaviviridae, order Amarillovirales, was reported in 2016. Here, we found EsClV in almost all sampling pools except for pool SQ-Asym (Fig. 2B) and generated a more complete genome sequence of EsClV with a length of 18,830 bp (Fig. 3). EsClV has a genome organization with a single ORF containing a papain-like cysteine peptidase domain, macro domain, helicase domain, and RdRp domain (Fig. 4). Phylogenetic analysis revealed that EsClV was closely related to a few viral sequences with genome lengths up to ~24,500 nt (up to 40.4% amino acid identity), and they formed a distinct clade that was not clustered within current genera of Flaviviridae (Fig. S5). The differences in genome length and host range between EsClV and current members of Flaviviridae indicate that EsClV and its relatives may represent a novel family in the order Amarillovirales. We propose to name this family “Megamonornaviridae.” This name was derived because these viruses have a large genome, are monopartite, and have a single-stranded RNA genome. Further study of the common characteristics of “Megamonornaviridae” needs to be performed to establish the novel family in the future.

(iv) Viruses in the order Nodamuvirales. In our work, three novel viral sequences belonging to the order Nodamuvirales were identified, tentatively named Eriocheir sinensis nodavirus 1 (EsNV1), Eriocheir sinensis nodavirus 2 (EsNV2), and Eriocheir sinensis noda-like virus (EsNlV). Members of the family Nodaviridae have two genomic RNAs, encoding the RdRp (~3.1 kb) and capsid protein (CP; ~1.4 kb), respectively (47). The RdRp-encoded genomic RNAs of EsNV1 (3,087 nt) and EsNV2 (3,018 nt) were found, but the genomic RNAs encoding CP were missing. The RdRp-encoded genomic RNAs of EsNV1 and EsNV2 both had a genome with one ORF encoding a methyltransferase domain and RdRp domain (Fig. 4).

Phylogenetic analysis revealed that EsNV1, Nodamura virus (NoV), and Shuangao insect virus 11 (SIV11) clustered together and fell within the genus Alphanodavirus (Fig. S6). The RdRp-encoded sequence of EsNV1 shared 58.1% amino acid identity with NoV and 66.2% with SIV11. Based on the ICTV report, definitive species demarcation within the genus Alphanodavirus requires the nucleotide sequence of the viral CP gene, as the two closest recognized species in this genus Black beetle virus and Flock house virus share 81% to 87% amino acid sequence identity in CP but are 99% identical in RdRp (47). The limited similarity of RdRp between EsClV and SIV11 suggests that EsNV1 may be considered a novel viral species in Alphanodavirus. The genomic RNA encoding CP of EsNV1 needs to be discovered and used to definitively classify EsNV1 in the future.

EsNV2 formed a clade with Yunnan sediment noda-like virus 1 that is sister to current two genera of the family Nodaviridae in the phylogenetic tree (Fig. S6). EsNV2 shares limited similarity (47.8% amino acid identity) with Yunnan sediment noda-like virus 1, indicating that it was a novel virus and may represent a novel genus in Nodaviridae. The establishment of this novel genus requires more characteristics of EsNV2 and similar viruses, including the genomic RNAs encoding CP and other biological properties.

EsNlV, Wenzhou crab virus 4, and Wenzhou tombus-like virus 18 formed a clade that is sister to the family Sinhaliviridae, based on the phylogenetic tree (Fig. S6). EsNlV shared 59.4% amino acid identity with Wenzhou crab virus 4 and 59.6% amino acid identity with Wenzhou tombus-like virus 18, suggesting EsNlV should be considered a new virus. The genome of EsNlV is 4,802 bp in length and has three ORFs that contain a methyltransferase domain, RdRp domain, and coat protein subunit, respectively (Fig. 4). Only two viruses that infect the western honeybee are currently classified as members of Sinhaliviridae, and these have non-segmented genomes that are ~5,900 nt in length and encode three ORFs (48). Unlike typical genomes of the family Nodaviridae, the genomes of EsNlV and its similar viruses are monopartite and encode three ORFs, showing more similarity to Sinhaliviridae than to Nodaviridae. The assignment of EsNlV requires further research in the future.

(v) Viruses in the order Tolivirales. Tombusviridae is a large family of viruses that infect monocotyledonous or dicotyledonous plants (49). Three subfamilies of Tombusviridae were created in 2018 based on their RdRp expression mechanisms and general gene order (50). Although Tombusviridae are considered plant viruses, previous studies have discovered a number of viruses closely related to members of Tombusviridae in crustaceans (4). Here, we also found two viruses closely related to the Tombusviridae subfamily Procedovirinae in Chinese mitten crabs. We identified a virus previously reported as Tombusviridae sp. isolate 258-k141_72490 (1,165 nt, GenBank accession no. ON049950) that contained a partial RdRp domain, and renamed it Eriocheir sinensis tombusvirus 1 (EsTV1). We generated a nearly complete genome of EsTV1 of 4,861 nt in length that contained P33 protein, RdRp domain, and a coat protein subunit (Fig. 4). Additionally, a novel tombusvirus with a length of 4,283 nt was identified and named Eriocheir sinensis tombusvirus 2 (EsTV2). EsTV2 has a similar genome organization to that of EsTV1, except that the function of its 5′ ORF is unknown. The genome organizations of EsTV1 and EsTV2 were similar to those of the subfamily Procedovirinae.

Phylogenetic analysis showed that EsTV1, EsTV2, and their related viruses formed a clade sister to the genus Avenavirus in the subfamily Procedovirinae (Fig. S7). EsTV2 shared limited similarity with Sanya tombus-like virus 2 (58.2% amino acid identity) and Forsythia suspensa tombusvirus (55.6% amino acid identity), suggesting that EsTV2 is a novel virus. The similarity of genome organization between EsTVs and the subfamily Procedovirinae and the phylogeny of EsTVs indicated that these viruses may represent novel genera of Procedovirinae in the family Tombusviridae. The phylogenetic result also showed that Procedovirinae was paraphyletic due to the introduction of EsTV1, EsTV2 and their relatives (Fig. S7). The phylogeny of Procedovirinae needs to be confirmed using more reference sequences in the future.

(vi) Viruses in the order Timlovirales. The taxonomy of positive single-stranded RNA phages (+ssRNA phages) has been restructured due to the rapidly increasing number of known +ssRNA phages (51, 52). In 2021, the class Allassoviricetes was renamed Leviviricetes and greatly expanded, resulting in an enormous taxonomic structure of 2 orders, 6 families, 428 genera, and 882 species. Two new +ssRNA phages belonging to the family Blumeviridae, order Timlovirales, are reported here. Eriocheir sinensis blumevirus 1 (EsBLV1) with 5,266 nt and Eriocheir sinensis blumevirus 2 (EsBLV2) with 3,514 nt both had genomes containing 3 ORFs: their 3′ ORF encoded the RdRp, while the functions of the other ORFs were unknown (Fig. 4). Based on the phylogenetic tree constructed using amino acid sequences encoding the RdRp, EsBLV1, EsBLV2, Beihai levi-like virus 12 (BLlV12), and two previously reported +ssRNA phages formed a clade together, but their branches were all long, meaning that these viruses were genetically distant from each other (Fig. S8). EsBLV1 shared 40.91% RdRp identity with Riboviria sp. isolate goldenpheasant222con20 (GenBank accession no. MW239254), but they did not cluster together in the phylogenetic tree. The criterion for establishing a novel genus in the class Leviviricetes is 50% pairwise amino acid identity of the RdRp (52). EsBLV1, EsBLV2, BLlV12, and their closely related viruses shared low amino acid identity of the RdRp with each other (34.4% to 40.9%), indicating that EsBLV1 and EsBLV2 represented novel genera in the family Blumeviridae. Here, we propose to establish two novel genera for EsBLV1 and EsBLV2, with the genus containing EsBLV1 named “Craspvirus,” standing for crab ssRNA phage, and the genus containing EsBLV2 named “Braspvirus,” standing for brachyuran ssRNA phage.

(vii) Viruses in the order Ourlivirales. The family Botourmiaviridae in the order Ourlivirales includes viruses infecting plants and fungi; most of its genera, except for Ourmiavirus (tripartite), have a non-segmented genome (2.0 to 5.3 kb) containing one ORF that encodes the RdRp (53). Two novel viral sequences related to the family Botourmiaviridae were identified in this study. Eriocheir sinensis botourmia-like virus 1 (EsBOlV1) with a length of 3,493 nt and Eriocheir sinensis botourmia-like virus 2 (EsBOlV2) with a length of 3,404 nt both had a genome containing only one ORF which encoded the RdRp (Fig. 4). EsBOlV1 and EsBOlV2 were most similar to each other, showing 88.0% amino acid identity in a genome-wide scale. Phylogenetic results showed that EsBOlV1, EsBOlV2, and their similar viruses cluster together and are relatively close to the genus Ourmiavirus of Botourmiaviridae (Fig. S9), but the genome organizations of these viruses were more similar to those in other Botourmiaviridae genera than to those in Ourmiavirus. The distinct hosts of EsBOlVs and the long branch length of the clade containing EsBOlVs indicated that EsBOlV1 and EsBOlV2 may represent a novel genus in the family Botourmiaviridae. Here, we propose to establish a novel genus named “Crabovirus” for EsBOlVs. This name was derived from the crabs’ botourmia-like virus.

(viii) Viruses in the order Picornavirales. Picornavirales is a large order of positive-sense single-stranded RNA viruses and currently encompasses 8 families, 104 genera, and 344 species (54). Here, we found 11 viruses related to 4 families in the order Picornavirales.

Picornaviridae is the largest family in Picornavirales and encompasses a number of viruses that infect vertebrates (55). Previous studies divided members of Picornaviridae into 5 subfamilies; in addition to the viruses assigned to these 5 subfamilies, Ampivirus A1, a species detected in newt feces (Lissotriton vulgaris), showed high divergence and formed a clade far away from all other genera in the phylogenetic tree (56). The limited availability of sequences for Ampivirus prevented further taxonomic assignment to a current or new subfamily. In this study, we found two viruses closely related to the species Ampivirus A1 in Chinese mitten crabs. A novel picorna-like virus sequence with a length of 8,297 bp, named Eriocheir sinensis picorna-like virus (EsPlV), was discovered. A previously reported virus, Shahe picorna-like virus 13 (SPlV13), with a length of 9,077 bp, was also found. These two viruses both had typical genome organizations of Picornaviridae: a long ORF containing a coat protein near the 5′ untranslated region (UTR) and a helicase, protease, and RdRp replication module (Hel-Pro-RdRp) near the 3′ UTR (Fig. 4). Phylogenetic results showed that EsPlV, SPlV13, Ampivirus sp. isolate 180b-k141_71509, and Ampivirus A1 were clustered as a clade distant from other Picornaviridae subfamilies (Fig. S10). Our phylogenetic tree also showed that the subfamily Paavivirinae of Picornaviridae clustered with the family Caliciviridae instead of with other subfamilies, indicating that the family Picornaviridae might be a paraphyletic group.

Dicistroviridae is a family of RNA viruses with genomes containing two ORFs encoding nonstructural proteins (Hel-Pro-RdRp module) near the 5′ UTR and capsid proteins near the 3′ UTR, respectively (57). Three novel virus sequences and a reported virus discovered in our work were related to the family Dicistroviridae. A novel virus sequence, named Eriocheir sinensis dicistro-like virus (EsDlV), was 9,308 nt long. EsDlV shared 70.2% amino acid identity with Shahe arthropod virus 1 (SAV1, 9,289 nt), which was also found in our study. EsDlV and SAV1 both had a typical genome organization of the family Dicistroviridae (Fig. 4). The phylogenetic tree showed that EsDlV and SAV1 clustered together and formed a clade sister to a big clade containing the families Dicistroviridae, Secoviridae, Iflaviridae, and Marnaviridae with low confidence (Fig. S10). The clade containing EsDlV and SAV1 was closer to Dicistroviridae than to other families. Due to the similar genome organization to Dicistroviridae and the phylogenetic results, we suggest that EsDlV and SAV1 may represent a new group of the family Dicistroviridae.

Two novel virus sequences were located within the family Dicistroviridae (Fig. S10). Eriocheir sinensis dicistrovirus 1 (EsDV1), with a length of 7,577 nt, clustered with Changjiang picorna-like virus 11 and Riboviria sp. isolate 5cz-RDRP-2 and formed a clade that was sister to the genus Triatovirus. Eriocheir sinensis dicistrovirus 2 (EsDV2), with a length of 7,116 bp, clustered with Wenzhou shrimp virus 5 and Wenzhou shrimp virus 4 and formed a clade that was sister to the members of the genus Aparavirus isolated from crustaceans. According to the ICTV report, the species demarcation criterion for the family Dicistroviridae is 90% amino acid identity of the CP (57). EsDV1 and EsDV2 shared less than 38% amino acid identity of the CP with their most similar viruses, suggesting that they are novel viral species in Dicistroviridae. Notably, our phylogenetic results showed that the genera Aparavirus and Cripavirus were both paraphyletic groups, suggesting that the current assignment of genera was incompatible with the expanding members of Dicistroviridae.

Iflaviridae is a family of viruses with RNA genomes approximately 9 to 11 kb in length that encode a single polyprotein (58). All members of this family have been isolated from arthropods. A novel sequence with partial genome encoding protease and RdRp, named Eriocheir sinensis iflavirus 1 (EsIV1), was found in this study (Fig. 4). In the phylogenetic tree, EsIV1 clustered with members of the family Iflaviridae, suggesting that EsIV1 was a possible new member of Iflaviridae (Fig. S10). The species demarcation criteria of Iflaviridae is 90% amino acid identity of the capsid proteins (58). The establishment of a new species in the family Iflaviridae requires the discovery of the complete EsIV1 genome in the future.

Marnaviridae is a greatly expanding family of viruses with RNA genomes 8.6 to 9.6 kb in length that encode one or two ORFs (59). Some members of Marnaviridae have been found in marine protists, and some are known from metagenomic studies of marine and freshwater environments and aquatic invertebrates (4, 59). Four new marnavirus sequences were identified in this study, including Eriocheir sinensis marnavirus 1 (EsMV1, 8,832 nt, 2 ORFs), Eriocheir sinensis marnavirus 2 (EsMV2, 8,634 nt, 2 ORFs), Eriocheir sinensis marnavirus 3 (EsMV3, 8,142 nt, 1 ORF), and Eriocheir sinensis marnavirus 4 (EsMV4, 7,809 nt, 2 ORFs). Phylogenetic analysis showed that EsMV1, EsMV2, EsMV3, and the members of the genus Locarnavirus formed a clade (Fig. S10). EsMV4 appears sister to this clade, suggesting that these marnaviruses were potential members of Locarnavirus. The species demarcation criteria of the genus Locarnavirus are based on pairwise comparisons of the RdRP (90% identity) and capsid (75%) amino acid sequences (59). EsMV1 shared 89.3% amino acid identity of RdRp and 98.4% amino acid identity of capsid with Sanya marna-like virus 2 (SMlV2), indicating that EsMV1 and SMlV2 may represent one novel species in the genus Locarnavirus. EsMV2 shared 65.3% amino acid identity of RdRp and 49.0% amino acid identity of capsid with Beihai picorna-like virus 47 (BPlV47), suggesting that EsMV2 may belong to a novel species in Locarnavirus. EsMV3 shared 40.8% amino acid identity of RdRp and 47.5% amino acid identity of capsid with Picornavirales sp. isolate HPLV-22 (GenBank accession no. OM622277), indicating that EsMV3 may also represent a novel species in Locarnavirus. EsMV4 shared 41.6% amino acid identity of RdRp sequence with mute swan feces-associated picorna-like virus 18 and shared <35.5% amino acid identity of capsid sequence with all similar viral sequences in the NCBI nonredundant protein (nr) database, suggesting that EsMV4 may also belong to a novel species.

(ix) Virus in the order Sobelivirales. There are three families in the order Sobelivirales: Alvernaviridae, Barnaviridae, and Solemoviridae. Members of these families possess genomes longer than 4,000 nt (6062). Two sobemo-like virus sequences were found in this study. Eriocheir sinensis sobemo-like virus 1 (EsSlV1), with a length of 3,124 bp, and Eriocheir sinensis sobemo-like virus 2 (EsSlV2), with a length of 3,046 bp, have similar genome structures that contain a longer ORF encoding peptidase S1 and a shorter ORF encoding RdRp (Fig. 3). Compared to current members of Sobelivirales, EsSlV1 and EsSlV2 have shorter genomes and lack the ORFs encoding capsid proteins. EsSlV1 shared low amino acid identity with Norway luteo-like virus 3 (38.2%) and Ixodes scapularis-associated virus 1 (38.7%). EsSlV2 shared 88.6% amino acid identity with Beihai sobemo-like virus 24. EsSlV1, EsSlV2, and their similar viruses formed a distinct clade and were distantly related to the current families of Sobelivirales in the phylogenetic tree constructed using the RdRp, indicating that EsSlVs may represent a novel group at the family level in Sobelivirales (Fig. S11). We propose to establish a novel family for EsSlVs, named “Arthsoviridae,” which is derived from arthropod sobemo-like viruses.

DISCUSSION

Many viromic studies have employed multi-location sampling to increase viral diversity and draw reliable conclusions. In our work, we observed high regional variation in viral species composition, with most of the viral species being region-specific, indicating the importance of multi-location sampling. For viromic research focused on uncovering novel viruses and expanding viral diversity, variation in viral species composition is an important component of viral diversity and should not be ignored. For viromic research focused on pathogen investigation, multi-location sampling can increase the reliability of analysis and exclude misleading regional differences.

We speculate that milky disease and hepatopancreatic necrosis syndrome are not mainly caused by viruses. The pathogen of MD was found to be the yeast Metschnikowia bicuspidate (24). Thirteen viral species which had higher relative abundances in MD-affected crab sample may have synergistic effects on the development of MD. A previous study reported that microsporidia were detected in the hepatopancreas of HPNS-affected crabs (25), and environmental stress, nutrition, and toxicants are also considered probable causes of HPNS (26, 63). The pathogen of HPNS is still unclear. Based on the comparison of relative abundance in the samples from Dongying and Suqian, none of the viral species were identified as potential pathogens of HPNS, suggesting that viruses are not the main cause of HPNS. The comparison of viromes between diseased crabs and asymptomatic crabs could provide new clues as to whether viruses play a role in the outbreak of diseases.

In current virus taxonomy, members from the same family or genus generally share similar host preferences. However, with the discovery of a large number of new viruses, many viruses found in organisms from different phyla and even different kingdoms show close evolutionary relationships (4). We noticed that a few viruses found in our study showed close relationships with plant viruses, especially as some of them exhibited higher abundance in diseased crabs than in asymptomatic crabs. EsKlV occupied a phylogenetic position within the family Kitaviridae, which currently consists of plant viruses, and it was highly abundant in diseased crabs from Tangshan and Suqian. EsBOlV1 was slightly more abundant in all libraries of diseased crabs than in those of asymptomatic crabs and clustered into a family consisting of plant and fungi viruses. EsTV2 (novel virus) shared the highest similarity with two viruses from two traditional Chinese herbs, Leptochloa chinensis and Forsythia suspensa. A previous study reported that Macrobrachium rosenbergii virus 15, found in the giant freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii, shared >99% amino acid identity with two viruses found in two traditional Chinese herbs, Trichosanthes kirilowii and F. suspensa (19). An important pathogen of the giant freshwater prawn, Macrobrachium rosenbergii nodavirus was found to have surprising similarities in its capsid structure with members of the family Tombusviridae which infect plants (64). The similarities between viruses found in crustaceans and those found in plants indicate the possibility of cross-species transmission. The transmission of viruses may introduce the risk of new diseases and harm the cultivation of crustaceans. The potential risk of cross-species transmission deserves to be systematically investigated in the future. In addition, the gills of crabs were pooled with other tissues for library construction, so the viruses that showed close relationships with plant viruses in our study may have come from the aquatic environment or from other organisms.

In summary, our findings showed that the Chinese mitten crab E. sinensis harbors many different viruses, most of which were first reported here. Four viral orders were found to be potential threats to the cultivation of Chinese mitten crabs based on their relative abundance between diseased and asymptomatic crabs. Furthermore, the viruses were classified based on their phylogenetic results, genome structures, and host preferences. We propose the establishment of three novel families and five novel genera in total. Our knowledge of viromes in Chinese mitten crab provides a foundation for further study of brachyuran crustacean aquaculture and virus taxonomy in the future.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

To explore the differences in viral composition among samples, we approached the analysis from several perspectives, including the number of viral species shared among different samples, the relative abundance of viral species in each sample, and the relative abundance of viral orders in each sample. Clean reads were mapped to 31 viral genomes and the number of reads or fragments that aligned to each viral genome was counted. For viral species with genomes of different lengths, we use fragments per kilobase of exon per million fragments mapped (FPKM) as the relative abundance. To assess the number of viral species in the sample and avoid false positive alignment, a species for which the number of mapped reads per million total reads (RPM) was greater than 10 was considered to be present in the sample. For higher viral taxa, we used RPM as the relative abundance because it is difficult to normalize the total amount of reads by length for multiple sequences from different viruses.

Sample collection.

Chinese mitten crabs with or without diseases were collected from farming ponds in three different regions in China (Table 1). Specifically, 10 crabs with MD and 10 asymptomatic crabs were collected in Tangshan, Hebei Province in April 2021; 10 HPNS-affected crabs and 10 asymptomatic crabs were collected in Dongying, Shandong Province in August 2021; and finally, 10 HPNS-affected crabs and 10 asymptomatic crabs were collected in Suqian, Jiangsu Province in October 2021. The hepatopancreas, branchia, and muscle tissues of each crab were harvested and stored in RNAlater (Invitrogen), then transported to Sun Yat-sen University on dry ice and stored at −80°C until use. We strictly complied with biosafety regulations in all of our experiments.

Sequencing library construction and sequencing.

The hepatopancreas, branchia, and muscle tissues of 10 diseased or 10 healthy crabs collected from each region were pooled, resulting in 6 pools for sequencing library construction. The sample pools were homogenized with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (10% [mass/vol]) in a Lu kα sample freezing grinder for 3 min at 60 Hz and 4°C, frozen, and thawed three times on dry ice. The suspension of each pool was subjected to centrifugation for 10 min at 12,000 × g. The supernatant was collected and filtered through a Durapore PVDF (polyvinylidene difluoride) 0.45-μm-pore filter (Millipore) to remove eukaryotic and bacterial cell-sized particles. The filtrates were subjected to ultracentrifugation (4°C, 180,000 × g) for 2 h to enrich the virus-like particles. After supernatant was carefully removed, the virus-like particles were resuspended for RNA extraction. RNA was extracted using a QIAamp Viral RNA minikit (Qiagen) in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol. The quality and quantity of the RNA were measured on a Qubit 4.0 Fluorometer (Invitrogen) using the Qubit RNA HS assay kit.

The rRNA was removed for library construction by the NEBNext rRNA Depletion kit (New England Biolabs [NEB]). RNA sequencing libraries were constructed using a NEBNext Ultra II RNA Library Prep kit for Illumina (NEB) in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol. The concentration of libraries was measured on a Qubit 4 Fluorometer (Invitrogen) using the Qubit dsDNA HS assay kit. Sequencing for the pair-end libraries were performed with 2 × 150 bp chemistry on the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform (Illumina).

Sequence assembly and virus discovery.

For each library, sequencing reads were first quality controlled using fastp (version 0.21.0) (65) and assembled de novo using SPAdes (version 3.15.3) (66) in rnaviral mode. Assembled contigs longer than 500 bp remained and were clustered using CD-HIT (version 4.8.1) (67). Contigs were then compared against the NCBI nr database using Diamond blastx (version 2.0.6) (68). Taxonomic lineage information was obtained for the top blast hit of each contig and reformatted using TaxonKit (version 0.7.2) (69), and contigs belonging to the kingdom “Viruses” were identified as probable virus hits. Viral contigs with unassembled overlaps were merged using the SeqMan program implemented in the Lasergene software package (version 7.1.0) (70).

To confirm the assembly results and limit false positives, quality-controlled reads were mapped to viral contigs using Bowtie2 (version 2.4.2) (71) and SAMtools (version 0.1.19) (72), and contigs for which the number of mapped reads per million total reads (RPM) in a library was greater than 10 were used for follow-up analysis.

Viral genome annotation.

Viral contigs were manually assigned to specific virus species by comparing their sequence similarity to each other and to the most similar sequences from nr database, based on the species demarcation criteria of specific taxa from the ICTV Report Chapters by Genome (https://ictv.global/report/genome). The ORFs of viral genomes were identified using ORFfinder (73). Protein function prediction was performed using InterProScan (version v5.52-86.2) (74). Genome organizations were visualized with ChiPlot (https://www.chiplot.online/). The novel viruses found in this study were named according to the scientific name of the Chinese mitten crab and the phylogenetic analysis described below.

Phylogenetic analysis and virus abundance analysis.

To determine the evolutionary relationships between viruses detected in this study and ICTV-designated species, we used the amino acid sequences of RdRp to construct phylogenetic trees. The amino acid sequences of RdRp were obtained by comparing the amino acid sequences of ORFs to the RdRp-scan database (version 0.90) (75) using Diamond blastp (version 2.0.6). The viral replicase sequence alignments were performed by mafft (version 7.310) (76) employing the L-INS-i algorithm, then trimmed using trimAL (77) with the default parameters encapsulated in TBtools (version 1.098669) (78). Phylogenetic trees were generated using IQ-TREE (version 1.6.12) (79) with the maximum-likelihood method. Branch support was estimated using both the SH-like approximate likelihood ratio test (SH-aLRT) and ultrafast bootstrap approximation (UFBoot) (80). Tree files were visualized with Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL, version 6) (81).

To access the relative abundances of virus species in each library, quality-controlled reads were mapped to the whole genome of virus species using Bowtie2, and the FPKM of each virus species in each library was calculated using featureCounts (version 2.0.2) (82). The heatmap was drawn in RStudio (version 1.3.959) using the pheatmap package (version 1.0.12).

Confirmation of viral genomes.

To verify the presence of the RdRp genes, we used the original samples for RT-PCR and nested RT-PCR with primer sets designed based on the RdRp sequences of viral genomes. The PCR products were sequenced using Sanger sequencing and then compared with the assembled sequences. To calculate the genome coverage of reads and the heterozygosity of SNPs, raw sequencing reads were aligned to the assembled genomes using bwa (version 0.7.17) (83). Genome coverage was evaluated using CollectWgsMetrics function implemented in Picard (version 3.0.0). SNPs were identified using BCFtools (version 1.9) (84), and the heterozygosity of SNPs was then calculated for each assembled genome.

Data availability.

Raw sequencing reads are accessible in NCBI under BioProject no. PRJNA921821. All viral sequences identified for the first time in this study have been deposited in GenBank under accession numbers OP019089 to OP019093, OP019095 to OP019108, and OP019111 to OP019132.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by the earmarked fund of the China Agriculture Research System for CARS-48 and the Innovation Group Project of Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai) (no. 311021006). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

The authors declare no competing interests.

J.H. and S.W. conceived the project and designed research; G.G., D.Z., X.H., Z.L., and Y.W. collected the samples and constructed sequencing libraries; G.G. and M.W. analyzed the data; P.H., G.C., and J.Z. performed the PCR confirmation; G.G., M.W., and J.H. wrote the manuscript with contribution from all authors.

Footnotes

Supplemental material is available online only.

Supplemental file 1
Supplemental material. Download spectrum.01439-23-s0001.docx, DOCX file, 4.1 MB (4.1MB, docx)

Contributor Information

Shaoping Weng, Email: lsswsp@mail.sysu.edu.cn.

Jianguo He, Email: lsshjg@mail.sysu.edu.cn.

Biao He, Changchun Veterinary Research Institute.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Liang G, Bushman FD. 2021. The human virome: assembly, composition and host interactions. Nat Rev Microbiol 19:514–527. doi: 10.1038/s41579-021-00536-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Li CX, Shi M, Tian JH, Lin XD, Kang YJ, Chen LJ, Qin XC, Xu JG, Holmes EC, Zhang YZ. 2015. Unprecedented genomic diversity of RNA viruses in arthropods reveals the ancestry of negative-sense RNA viruses. Elife 4:05378. doi: 10.7554/eLife.05378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Paez-Espino D, Eloe-Fadrosh EA, Pavlopoulos GA, Thomas AD, Huntemann M, Mikhailova N, Rubin E, Ivanova NN, Kyrpides NC. 2016. Uncovering Earth’s virome. Nature 536:425–430. doi: 10.1038/nature19094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Shi M, Lin XD, Tian JH, Chen LJ, Chen X, Li CX, Qin XC, Li J, Cao JP, Eden JS, Buchmann J, Wang W, Xu JG, Holmes EC, Zhang YZ. 2016. Redefining the invertebrate RNA virosphere. Nature 540:539–543. doi: 10.1038/nature20167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Shi M, Lin XD, Chen X, Tian JH, Chen LJ, Li K, Wang W, Eden JS, Shen JJ, Liu L, Holmes EC, Zhang YZ. 2018. The evolutionary history of vertebrate RNA viruses. Nature 556:197–202. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0012-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wolf YI, Silas S, Wang Y, Wu S, Bocek M, Kazlauskas D, Krupovic M, Fire A, Dolja VV, Koonin EV. 2020. Doubling of the known set of RNA viruses by metagenomic analysis of an aquatic virome. Nat Microbiol 5:1262–1270. doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-0755-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chong R, Shi M, Grueber CE, Holmes EC, Hogg CJ, Belov K, Barrs VR. 2019. Fecal viral diversity of captive and wild Tasmanian devils characterized using virion-enriched metagenomics and metatranscriptomics. J Virol 93:e00205-19. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00205-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sun Y, Qu Y, Yan X, Yan G, Chen J, Wang G, Zhao Z, Liu Y, Tu C, He B. 2022. Comprehensive evaluation of RNA and DNA viromic methods based on species richness and abundance analyses using marmot rectal samples. mSystems 7:e00430-22. doi: 10.1128/msystems.00430-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhang W, Yang SX, Shan TL, Hou R, Liu ZJ, Li W, Guo LH, Wang Y, Chen P, Wang XC, Feng FF, Wang H, Chen C, Shen Q, Zhou CL, Hua XG, Cui L, Deng XT, Zhang ZH, Qi DW, Delwart E. 2017. Virome comparisons in wild-diseased and healthy captive giant pandas. Microbiome 5:90. doi: 10.1186/s40168-017-0308-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hu D, Zhu CQ, Wang Y, Ai LL, Yang L, Ye FQ, Ding CX, Chen JF, He BA, Zhu J, Qian H, Xu WR, Feng YJ, Tan WL, Wang CJ. 2017. Virome analysis for identification of novel mammalian viruses in bats from Southeast China. Sci Rep 7:10917. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-11384-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Roberts JMK, Anderson DL, Durr PA. 2018. Metagenomic analysis of Varroa-free Australian honey bees (Apis mellifera) shows a diverse Picornavirales virome. J Gen Virol 99:818–826. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.001073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.He WT, Hou X, Zhao J, Sun JM, He HJ, Si W, Wang J, Jiang ZW, Yan ZQ, Xing G, Lu M, Suchard MA, Ji X, Gong WJ, He B, Li J, Lemey P, Guo DY, Tu CC, Holmes EC, Shi M, Su S. 2022. Virome characterization of game animals in China reveals a spectrum of emerging pathogens. Cell 185:1117–1129.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.02.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zarate S, Taboada B, Yocupicio-Monroy M, Arias CF. 2017. Human virome. Arch Med Res 48:701–716. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2018.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zhang YY, Chen YC, Wei XM, Cui J. 2022. Viromes in marine ecosystems reveal remarkable invertebrate RNA virus diversity. Sci China Life Sci 65:426–437. doi: 10.1007/s11427-020-1936-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chen YM, Sadiq S, Tian JH, Chen X, Lin XD, Shen JJ, Chen H, Hao ZY, Wille M, Zhou ZC, Wu J, Li F, Wang HW, Yang WD, Xu QY, Wang W, Gao WH, Holmes EC, Zhang YZ. 2022. RNA viromes from terrestrial sites across China expand environmental viral diversity. Nat Microbiol 7:1312–1323. doi: 10.1038/s41564-022-01180-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tavares CPD, Silva UAT, Pie M, Ostrensky A. 2023. A review of viral diseases in cultured brachyuran crustaceans. Aquacult Int 31:627–655. doi: 10.1007/s10499-022-00993-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bonami JR, Zhang S. 2011. Viral diseases in commercially exploited crabs: a review. J Invertebr Pathol 106:6–17. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2010.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Weng SP, Guo ZX, Sun JJ, Chan SM, He JG. 2007. A reovirus disease in cultured mud crab, Scylla serrata, in southern China. J Fish Dis 30:133–139. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2761.2007.00794.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zhou D, Liu S, Guo G, He X, Xing C, Miao Q, Chen G, Chen X, Yan H, Zeng J, Zheng Z, Deng H, Weng S, He J. 2022. Virome analysis of normal and growth retardation disease-affected Macrobrachium rosenbergii. Microbiol Spectr 10:e0146222. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01462-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kadlečková D, Tachezy R, Erban T, Deboutte W, Nunvář J, Saláková M, Matthijnssens J. 2022. The virome of healthy honey bee colonies: ubiquitous occurrence of known and new viruses in bee populations. mSystems 7:e00072-22. doi: 10.1128/msystems.00072-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Olmedo-Velarde A, Loristo J, Kong A, Waisen P, Wang KH, Hu J, Melzer M. 2022. Examination of the virome of taro plants affected by a lethal disease, the alomae-bobone virus complex, in Papua New Guinea. Viruses 14:1410. doi: 10.3390/v14071410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Fetters AM, Cantalupo PG, Wei N, Robles MTS, Stanley A, Stephens JD, Pipas JM, Ashman TL. 2022. The pollen virome of wild plants and its association with variation in floral traits and land use. Nat Commun 13:523. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28143-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). 2022. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture, 2022 ed, p 44. doi: 10.4060/cc0461en. FAO, Rome, Italy. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bao J, Jiang HB, Shen HB, Xing YN, Feng CC, Li XD, Chen QJ. 2021. First description of milky disease in the Chinese mitten crab Eriocheir sinensis caused by the yeast Metschnikowia bicuspidata. Aquaculture 532:735984. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.735984. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ding Z, Meng Q, Liu H, Yuan S, Zhang F, Sun M, Zhao Y, Shen M, Zhou G, Pan J, Xue H, Wang W. 2016. First case of hepatopancreatic necrosis disease in pond-reared Chinese mitten crab, Eriocheir sinensis, associated with microsporidian. J Fish Dis 39:1043–1051. doi: 10.1111/jfd.12437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Shen H, Zang Y, Song K, Ma Y, Dai T, Serwadda A. 2017. A meta-transcriptomics survey reveals changes in the microbiota of the Chinese mitten crab Eriocheir sinensis infected with hepatopancreatic necrosis disease. Front Microbiol 8:732. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zhang SY, Zhang JH, Huang CH, Jean-Robert B, Shi ZL. 2002. Preliminary studies on two strains of reovirus from crab Eriocheir sinensis. [In Chinese.] Virol Sin 17:263–265. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zhang S, Shi Z, Zhang J, Bonami JR. 2004. Purification and characterization of a new reovirus from the Chinese mitten crab, Eriocheir sinensis. J Fish Dis 27:687–692. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2761.2004.00587.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zhang S, Bonami JR. 2012. Isolation and partial characterization of a new reovirus in the Chinese mitten crab, Eriocheir sinensis H. Milne Edwards. J Fish Dis 35:733–739. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2761.2012.01398.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Shen H, Ma Y, Hu Y. 2015. Near-full-length genome sequence of a novel reovirus from the Chinese mitten crab, Eriocheir sinensis. Genome Announc 3:e00447-15. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00447-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Matthijnssens J, Attoui H, Banyai K, Brussaard CPD, Danthi P, Del Vas M, Dermody TS, Duncan R, Fang Q, Johne R, Mertens PPC, Jaafar FM, Patton JT, Sasaya T, Suzuki N, Wei TY. 2022. ICTV virus taxonomy profile: Sedoreoviridae 2022. J Gen Virol 103. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.001781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zhao ML, Tavares CPD, Schott EJ. 2021. Diversity and classification of reoviruses in crustaceans: a proposal. J Invertebrate Pathol 182:107568. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2021.107568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Huang P, Zhang X, Ame KH, Shui Y, Xu Z, Serwadda A, Shen H. 2019. Genomic and phylogenetic characterization of a bunya-like virus from the freshwater Chinese mitten crab Eriocheir sinensis. Acta Virol 63:433–438. doi: 10.4149/av_2019_410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Walker PJ, Siddell SG, Lefkowitz EJ, Mushegian AR, Adriaenssens EM, Alfenas-Zerbini P, Davison AJ, Dempsey DM, Dutilh BE, García ML, Harrach B, Harrison RL, Hendrickson RC, Junglen S, Knowles NJ, Krupovic M, Kuhn JH, Lambert AJ, Łobocka M, Nibert ML, Oksanen HM, Orton RJ, Robertson DL, Rubino L, Sabanadzovic S, Simmonds P, Smith DB, Suzuki N, Van Dooerslaer K, Vandamme A-M, Varsani A, Zerbini FM. 2021. Changes to virus taxonomy and to the International Code of Virus Classification and Nomenclature ratified by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (2021). Arch Virol 166:2633–2648. doi: 10.1007/s00705-021-05156-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sutela S, Forgia M, Vainio EJ, Chiapello M, Daghino S, Vallino M, Martino E, Girlanda M, Perotto S, Turina M. 2020. The virome from a collection of endomycorrhizal fungi reveals new viral taxa with unprecedented genome organization. Virus Evol 6:veaa076. doi: 10.1093/ve/veaa076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kuhn JH, Adkins S, Alkhovsky SV, Avšič-Županc T, Ayllón MA, Bahl J, Balkema-Buschmann A, Ballinger MJ, Bandte M, Beer M, Bejerman N, Bergeron É, Biedenkopf N, Bigarré L, Blair CD, Blasdell KR, Bradfute SB, Briese T, Brown PA, Bruggmann R, Buchholz UJ, Buchmeier MJ, Bukreyev A, Burt F, Büttner C, Calisher CH, Candresse T, Carson J, Casas I, Chandran K, Charrel RN, Chiaki Y, Crane A, Crane M, Dacheux L, Bó ED, de la Torre JC, de Lamballerie X, de Souza WM, de Swart RL, Dheilly NM, Di Paola N, Di Serio F, Dietzgen RG, Digiaro M, Drexler JF, Duprex WP, Dürrwald R, Easton AJ, Elbeaino T, et al. 2022. 2022 taxonomic update of phylum Negarnaviricota (Riboviria: Orthornavirae), including the large orders Bunyavirales and Mononegavirales. Arch Virol 167:2857–2906. doi: 10.1007/s00705-022-05546-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gilmer D, Ratti C, ICTV Report Consortium . 2017. ICTV virus taxonomy profile: Benyviridae. J Gen Virol 98:1571–1572. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.000864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Purdy MA, Drexler JF, Meng XJ, Norder H, Okamoto H, Van der Poel WHM, Reuter G, de Souza WM, Ulrich RG, Smith DB. 2022. ICTV virus taxonomy profile: Hepeviridae 2022. J Gen Virol 103. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.001778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Mankertz A, Chen MH, Goldberg TL, Hubschen JM, Pfaff F, Ulrich RG, ICTV Report Consortium . 2022. ICTV virus taxonomy profile: Matonaviridae 2022. J Gen Virol 103. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.001817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Dorrington RA, Jiwaji M, Awando JA, Bruyn MM. 2020. Advances in Tetravirus research: new insight into the infectious virus lifecycle and an expanding host range. Curr Issues Mol Biol 34:145–162. doi: 10.21775/cimb.034.145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Melzer M, Freitas-Astúa J, Rodriguez JCV, Roy A, Wei G. 2018. Create one new family Kitaviridae comprising three previously unassigned genera, Cilevirus, Blunervirus and Higrevirus 2018.002P. https://ictv.global/ictv/proposals/2018.002P.A.Kitaviridae.zip. Accessed 17 Apr 2019.
  • 42.Vasilakis N, Forrester NL, Palacios G, Nasar F, Savji N, Rossi SL, Guzman H, Wood TG, Popov V, Gorchakov R, Gonzalez AV, Haddow AD, Watts DM, da Rosa APAT, Weaver SC, Lipkin WI, Tesh RB. 2013. Negevirus: a proposed new taxon of insect-specific viruses with wide geographic distribution. J Virol 87:2475–2488. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00776-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kallies R, Kopp A, Zirkel F, Estrada A, Gillespie TR, Drosten C, Junglen S. 2014. Genetic characterization of goutanap virus, a novel virus related to negeviruses, cileviruses and higreviruses. Viruses 6:4346–4357. doi: 10.3390/v6114346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Roy A, Hartung JS, Schneider WL, Shao J, Leon G, Melzer MJ, Beard JJ, Otero-Colina G, Bauchan GR, Ochoa R, Brlansky RH. 2015. Role bending: complex relationships between viruses, hosts, and vectors related to citrus leprosis, an emerging disease. Phytopathology 105:1013–1025. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-12-14-0375-FI. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Nunes MRT, Contreras-Gutierrez MA, Guzman H, Martins LC, Barbirato MF, Savit C, Balta V, Uribe S, Vivero R, Suaza JD, Oliveira H, Neto JPN, Carvalho VL, da Silva SP, Cardoso JF, de Oliveira RS, Lemos PD, Wood TG, Widen SG, Vasconcelos PFC, Fish D, Vasilakis N, Tesh RB. 2017. Genetic characterization, molecular epidemiology, and phylogenetic relationships of insect-specific viruses in the taxon Negevirus. Virology 504:152–167. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2017.01.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Simmonds P, Becher P, Bukh J, Gould EA, Meyers G, Monath T, Muerhoff S, Pletnev A, Rico-Hesse R, Smith DB, Stapleton JT, ICTV Report Consortium . 2017. ICTV virus taxonomy profile: Flaviviridae. J Gen Virol 98:2–3. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.000672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hameed ASS, Ninawe AS, Nakai T, Chi SC, Johnson KL, ICTV Report Consortium . 2019. ICTV virus taxonomy profile: Nodaviridae. J Gen Virol 100:3–4. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.001170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Daughenbaugh KF, Martin M, Brutscher LM, Cavigli I, Garcia E, Lavin M, Flenniken ML. 2015. Honey bee infecting Lake Sinai viruses. Viruses 7:3285–3309. doi: 10.3390/v7062772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.King AMQ, Lefkowitz E, Adams MJ, Carstens EB. 2011. Virus taxonomy: ninth report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. Elsevier Science, Burlington, VT. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Scheets K, Surapathrudu K, Miller WA. 2018. Create three subfamilies in family Tombusviridae. https://ictv.global/ictv/proposals/2018.001P.A.v1.Tombusviridae_3subfam.zip.
  • 51.Callanan J, Stockdale SR, Shkoporov A, Draper LA, Ross RP, Hill C. 2020. Expansion of known ssRNA phage genomes: from tens to over a thousand. Sci Adv 6:aay5981. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aay5981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Callanan J, Stockdale SR, Adriaenssens EM, Kuhn JH, Rumnieks J, Pallen MJ, Shkoporov AN, Draper LA, Ross RP, Hill C. 2021. Leviviricetes: expanding and restructuring the taxonomy of bacteria-infecting single-stranded RNA viruses. Microb Genom 7:000686. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ayllon MA, Turina M, Xie JT, Nerva L, Marzano SYL, Donaire L, Jiang DH, ICTV Report Consortium . 2020. ICTV virus taxonomy profile: Botourmiaviridae. J Gen Virol 101:454–455. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.001409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Walker PJ, Siddell SG, Lefkowitz EJ, Mushegian AR, Adriaenssens EM, Alfenas-Zerbini P, Dempsey DM, Dutilh BE, García ML, Curtis Hendrickson R, Junglen S, Krupovic M, Kuhn JH, Lambert AJ, Łobocka M, Oksanen HM, Orton RJ, Robertson DL, Rubino L, Sabanadzovic S, Simmonds P, Smith DB, Suzuki N, Van Doorslaer K, Vandamme A-M, Varsani A, Zerbini FM. 2022. Recent changes to virus taxonomy ratified by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (2022). Arch Virol 167:2429–2440. doi: 10.1007/s00705-022-05516-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Zell R, Delwart E, Gorbalenya AE, Hovi T, King AMQ, Knowles NJ, Lindberg AM, Pallansch MA, Palmenberg AC, Reuter G, Simmonds P, Skern T, Stanway G, Yamashita T, ICTV Report Consortium . 2017. ICTV virus taxonomy profile: Picornaviridae. J Gen Virol 98:2421–2422. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.000911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Zell R, Knowles NJ, Simmonds P. 2021. A proposed division of the family Picornaviridae into subfamilies based on phylogenetic relationships and functional genomic organization. Arch Virol 166:2927–2935. doi: 10.1007/s00705-021-05178-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Valles SM, Chen Y, Firth AE, Guérin DMA, Hashimoto Y, Herrero S, de Miranda JR, Ryabov E, ICTV Report Consortium . 2017. ICTV virus taxonomy profile: Dicistroviridae. J Gen Virol 98:355–356. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.000756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Valles SM, Chen Y, Firth AE, Guerin DMA, Hashimoto Y, Herrero S, de Miranda JR, Ryabov E, ICTV Report Consortium . 2017. ICTV virus taxonomy profile: Iflaviridae. J Gen Virol 98:527–528. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.000757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Lang AS, Vlok M, Culley AI, Suttle CA, Takao Y, Tomaru Y, ICTV Report Consortium . 2021. ICTV virus taxonomy profile: Marnaviridae 2021. J Gen Virol 102:001633. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.001633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Somera M, Fargette D, Hebrard E, Sarmiento C, ICTV Report Consortium . 2021. ICTV virus taxonomy profile: Solemoviridae 2021. J Gen Virol 102:001707. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.001707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Nagasaki K, Shirai Y, Takao Y, Mizumoto H, Nishida K, Tomaru Y. 2005. Comparison of genome sequences of single-stranded RNA viruses infecting the bivalve-killing dinoflagellate Heterocapsa circularisquama. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:8888–8894. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.12.8888-8894.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Revill PA, Davidson AD, Wright PJ. 1994. The nucleotide sequence and genome organization of mushroom bacilliform virus: a single-stranded RNA virus of Agaricus bisporus (Lange) Imbach. Virology 202:904–911. doi: 10.1006/viro.1994.1412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Huang XL, Feng Y, Duan HM, Zhao L, Yang C, Geng Y, Ouyang P, Chen DF, Yin LZ, Yang SY. 2021. Evaluation of pathology and environmental variables contributing to hepatopancreatic necrosis syndrome of Chinese mitten crab, Eriocheir sinensis. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 215:112157. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Ho KL, Gabrielsen M, Beh PL, Kueh CL, Thong QX, Streetley J, Tan WS, Bhella D. 2018. Structure of the Macrobrachium rosenbergii nodavirus: a new genus within the Nodaviridae? PLoS Biol 16:e3000038. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Chen SF, Zhou YQ, Chen YR, Gu J. 2018. fastp: An ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34:i884–i890. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Prjibelski A, Antipov D, Meleshko D, Lapidus A, Korobeynikov A. 2020. Using SPAdes de novo assembler. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics 70:e102. doi: 10.1002/cpbi.102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Fu L, Niu B, Zhu Z, Wu S, Li W. 2012. CD-HIT: accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics 28:3150–3152. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Buchfink B, Xie C, Huson DH. 2015. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat Methods 12:59–60. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Shen W, Ren H. 2021. TaxonKit: a practical and efficient NCBI taxonomy toolkit. J Genet Genomics 48:844–850. doi: 10.1016/j.jgg.2021.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Clewley JP. 1995. Macintosh sequence analysis software. DNAStar’s LaserGene. Mol Biotechnol 3:221–224. doi: 10.1007/BF02789332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Langmead B, Salzberg SL. 2012. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods 9:357–359. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R, Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup . 2009. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25:2078–2079. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Rombel IT, Sykes KF, Rayner S, Johnston SA. 2002. ORF-FINDER: a vector for high-throughput gene identification. Gene 282:33–41. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(01)00819-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Jones P, Binns D, Chang HY, Fraser M, Li W, McAnulla C, McWilliam H, Maslen J, Mitchell A, Nuka G, Pesseat S, Quinn AF, Sangrador-Vegas A, Scheremetjew M, Yong SY, Lopez R, Hunter S. 2014. InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics 30:1236–1240. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Charon J, Buchmann JP, Sadiq S, Holmes EC. 2022. RdRp-scan: a bioinformatic resource to identify and annotate divergent RNA viruses in metagenomic sequence data. Virus Evol 8:veac082. doi: 10.1093/ve/veac082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Katoh K, Standley DM. 2013. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol 30:772–780. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Capella-Gutierrez S, Silla-Martinez JM, Gabaldon T. 2009. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 25:1972–1973. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Chen C, Chen H, Zhang Y, Thomas HR, Frank MH, He Y, Xia R. 2020. TBtools: an integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. Mol Plant 13:1194–1202. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2020.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. 2015. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 32:268–274. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Hoang DT, Chernomor O, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ, Vinh LS. 2018. UFBoot2: improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Mol Biol Evol 35:518–522. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Letunic I, Bork P. 2021. Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 49:W293–W296. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W. 2014. featureCounts: An efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 30:923–930. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Li H, Durbin R. 2009. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25:1754–1760. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Danecek P, Bonfield JK, Liddle J, Marshall J, Ohan V, Pollard MO, Whitwham A, Keane T, McCarthy SA, Davies RM, Li H. 2021. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. Gigascience 10:giab008. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giab008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental file 1

Supplemental material. Download spectrum.01439-23-s0001.docx, DOCX file, 4.1 MB (4.1MB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

Raw sequencing reads are accessible in NCBI under BioProject no. PRJNA921821. All viral sequences identified for the first time in this study have been deposited in GenBank under accession numbers OP019089 to OP019093, OP019095 to OP019108, and OP019111 to OP019132.


Articles from Microbiology Spectrum are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES