Skip to main content
Microbiology Spectrum logoLink to Microbiology Spectrum
. 2023 Jul 3;11(4):e01032-23. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01032-23

Identification and Genetic Characterization of Conjugative Plasmids Encoding Coresistance to Ciprofloxacin and Cephalosporin in Foodborne Vibrio spp.

Yating Xu a,b, Zhiwei Zheng c,d, Lianwei Ye a,d, Edward Wai-Chi Chan d, Sheng Chen b,c,d,
Editor: Ana-Maria Dragoie
PMCID: PMC10434038  PMID: 37395663

ABSTRACT

Plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance (PMQR) determinants, such as qnrVC genes, have been widely reported in Vibrio spp. while other types of PMQR genes were rarely reported in these bacteria. This study characterized the phenotypic and genotypic features of foodborne Vibrio spp. carrying qnrS, a key PMQR gene in Enterobacteriaceae. Among a total of 1,811 foodborne Vibrio isolates tested, 34 (1.88%) were found to harbor the qnrS gene. The allele qnrS2 was the most prevalent, but coexistence with other qnr alleles was common. Missense mutations in the quinolone resistance-determining region (QRDR) of the gyrA and parC genes were only found in 11 of the 34 qnrS-bearing isolates. Antimicrobial susceptibility tests showed that all 34 qnrS-bearing isolates were resistant to ampicillin and that a high percentage also exhibited resistance to cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Genetic analysis showed that these phenotypes were attributed to a diverse range of resistance elements that the qnrS-bearing isolates harbored. The qnrS2 gene could be found in both the chromosome and plasmids; the plasmid-borne qnrS2 genes could be found on both conjugative and nonconjugative plasmids. pAQU-type qnrS2-bearing conjugative plasmids were able to mediate expression of phenotypic resistance to both ciprofloxacin and cephalosporins. Transmission of this plasmid among Vibrio spp. would speed up the emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens that are resistant to the most important antibiotics used in treatment of Vibrio infections, suggesting that close monitoring of emergence and dissemination of MDR Vibrio spp. in both food samples and clinical settings is necessary.

IMPORTANCE Vibrio spp. used to be very susceptible to antibiotics. However, resistance to clinically important antibiotics, such as cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones, among clinically isolated Vibrio strains is increasingly common. In this study, we found that plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance (PMQR) genes, such as qnrS, that have not been previously reported in Vibrio spp. can now be detected in food isolates. The qnrS2 gene alone could mediate expression of ciprofloxacin resistance in Vibrio spp.; importantly, this gene could be found in both the chromosome and plasmids. The plasmids that harbor the qnrS2 gene could be both conjugative and nonconjugative, among which the pAQU-type qnrS2-bearing conjugative plasmids were able to mediate expression of resistance to both ciprofloxacin and cephalosporins. Transmission of this plasmid among Vibrio spp. would accelerate the emergence of multidrug-resistant pathogens.

KEYWORDS: foodborne Vibrio spp., antimicrobial resistance, plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance, qnrS gene, pAQU-like plasmid

INTRODUCTION

Vibrio spp. are water- and seafood-borne bacterial pathogens that can cause large-scale outbreaks of gastrointestinal infections (1). Quinolones are among the most important antibacterial agents used in the clinical treatment of bacterial infections and in the field of veterinary medicine (2). Fluoroquinolones (FQs), which are second-generation quinolones, exhibit noticeably enhanced activity against a range of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria (3, 4) and are widely used synthetic broad-spectrum antibiotics that are also recommended for the treatment of Vibrio infections in humans (4). However, recent studies identified a range of underlying mechanisms of resistance in fluoroquinolone-resistant Vibrio spp.; these include chromosomal mutations in the quinolone resistance-determining region (QRDR) of the genes encoding DNA gyrase (gyrA and gyrB) and DNA topoisomerase IV (parC and parE). It was found that such mutational changes were often associated with changes in the expression levels of various outer membrane proteins or efflux pumps (5, 6). In addition, plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance (PMQR) determinants, which encode a range of resistance-conferring proteins, including the Qnr proteins, the aminoglycoside acetyltransferase AAC(6′)-Ib-cr, and the efflux pumps QepA and OqxAB, have been reported to confer low-level resistance to fluoroquinolones (7, 8). Unlike the target site mutations, which can be passed onto future generations, the plasmid-borne PMQR genes can not only enhance the ability of bacteria to survive against the antimicrobial effects of antibiotics but also accelerate the dissemination of resistance genes among a diverse range of bacterial species through horizontal transfer of the resistance-encoding plasmids (9, 10).

The PMQR gene qnrS was first discovered in 2006. The gene, which was recovered from an S. flexneri 2b strain isolated in Japan, was found to be located in a 47-kb conjugative plasmid, pAH0376 (11, 12). To date, nine qnrS alleles have been documented; these genes were recovered from various types of microorganisms and the environment; more recently, six other alleles (qnrS10 to qnrS15) have been identified, and their sequences have been deposited into GenBank (13). Previous studies showed that qnrS genes could be located in both the chromosome and plasmids. The mobilization and dissemination of qnrS alleles are known to be mediated by insertion sequences (IS), including IS2, IS26, and ISEc1 (14, 15). In addition, qnrS has also been discovered in the vicinity of Tn3-like structures carrying blaTEM-1 (16). Cephalosporins are a large group of related β-lactam antimicrobial drugs. The third-generation class of cephalosporins, such as cefotaxime and ceftriaxone, are broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents most commonly used in the management and treatment of infections caused by both Gram-negative and Gram-positive pathogens. Bacterial resistance to third-generation cephalosporins is attributed to the production of β-lactamases, including extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs), AmpCs, and carbapenemases (17, 18). The spread of genes encoding extended-spectrum β-lactamase among diverse pathogens poses a major threat to the treatment of bacterial infections.

In the present study, we investigated the carriage of PMQR genes among foodborne Vibrio spp., particularly qnrS, which has been shown to mediate expression of phenotypic resistance to ciprofloxacin in other bacterial pathogens, such as Salmonella (19). We also analyzed the genetic background of the qnrS gene and the transferability of the plasmids harboring this gene. Our findings in this work not only identified and characterized PMQR genes, such as qnrS in Vibrio spp., for the first time but also identified conjugative plasmids that encode coresistance to ciprofloxacin and cephalosporins, which provides important insight into the rapid evolution of foodborne Vibrio spp. that exhibit resistance to clinically important antibiotics and warrants further monitoring and investigation.

RESULTS

Among a total of 1,811 Vibrio species strains isolated, 34 (1.88%) were found to be positive for the qnrS genes by PCR tests (Fig. 1), including 25 Vibrio alginolyticus and 9 Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Of the 34 qnrS-carrying Vibrio species isolates, 91.18% (31/34) were isolated from shrimp. Only two were from pork, and one was isolated from chicken. Most of these qnrS-positive strains were isolated in the year 2016 (24/34, 70.59%), followed by the year 2015 (7/34, 20.59%). Only three strains were identified in 2017. Whole-genome sequencing was performed on these 34 strains, with results confirming the presence of the qnrS gene. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) analysis of nine V. parahaemolyticus strains indicated that they belonged to four sequence types (STs), including ST2264 (strains 886, 896, and 897), ST1042 (strain 924), ST1043 (strain 1007), and ST2257 (strain 2111). Sequence analysis showed that qnrS2 was the most prevalent allele (25 out of 34, 73.53%), followed by qnrS5 (4 out of 34, 11.76%). Interestingly, qnrS2 and qnrS5 were found to coexist in five isolates (14.71%). Nineteen isolates positive for the qnrS gene were also found to harbor the qnrVC gene. Notably, there were two isolates that carried three PMQR determinants, namely, qnrS, qnrA, and qnrVC (Fig. 1). DNA sequencing of the QRDR of the gyrA and parC genes of the 34 qnrS-positive Vibrio isolates revealed that point mutations leading to amino acid substitutions exist in 11 isolates. In the case of gyrA, only one type of amino acid change, namely, a change from serine to isoleucine in codon 83 of the GyrA protein, could be detected in 29.41% (10/34) of the isolates. Point mutations in gyrA at position 83 (Ser→Ile) and parC at position 85 (Ser→Leu) were only detected in four V. alginolyticus isolates (strains 839, 2025, 2026, and 2129). Additionally, a double mutation in parC (Ser85Leu and Pro97Ala) and a mutation in codon 83 of gyrA (Ser83Ile) were observed in V. alginolyticus strain 818. Moreover, a mutation in the parC gene that caused the Ser85Phe substitution was only detected in V. parahaemolyticus strain 862. However, no point mutations were observed in the genes gyrB and parE.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree and strain information of qnrS-carrying Vibrio spp. included in this study based on SNPs of core genomes. a, Abbreviations: ID, identification; CIP, ciprofloxacin; VA, Vibrio alginolyticus; VP, Vibrio parahaemolyticus. b, D218E substitution in QnrS2. c, R5N, R35C, A105V, H106N, T123N, V192I, V214I, and F216Y substitutions in QnrS5. d, R5N, R35C, V61A, H106N, T123N, R161L, V192I, V214I, and F216Y substitutions in QnrS5; +, conjugative plasmid.

Antimicrobial susceptibility tests of the 34 qnrS-bearing isolates showed that all test strains were resistant to ampicillin and that a high percentage of these isolates exhibited resistance to cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (79.41%, 79.41%, and 82.35%, respectively). However, the rates of resistance to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and chloramphenicol were 29.41% and 23.53%, respectively. All test strains remained susceptible to amikacin and meropenem and exhibited a high rate of susceptibility to gentamicin (33/34, 97.06%). The rates of resistance to three quinolone antibiotics, namely, nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin, and ofloxacin, were 32.35%, 38.24%, and 23.53%, respectively. As much as 97.06% (33/34) of the test strains were regarded as multidrug resistant (MDR), exhibiting resistance to more than three types of antibiotics (Table 1). It should be noted that all 34 qnrS-bearing isolates exhibited reduced susceptibility to ciprofloxacin (MIC of ≥0.25 μg/mL).

TABLE 1.

Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of 34 foodborne qnrS-bearing Vibrio species isolates

Strain ID MIC (μg/mL)a,b
AMP CRO CTX MEM AMC AMK GEN TET CHL SXT NAL CIP OFX
301 >64 0.12 0.06 0.0075 8 1 1 16 32 >8 8 1 1
431 >64 >16 >16 0.12 32 2 0.5 8 4 >8 8 2 1
661 >64 >16 >16 0.06 32 2 1 16 32 >8 8 2 1
704 >64 >16 >16 0.12 8 2 1 32 16 >8 4 4 1
780 >64 >16 >16 0.0075 4 2 1 2 4 >8 8 2 2
812 >64 >16 >16 0.0075 4 1 1 2 4 >8 4 1 2
818 >64 >16 16 0.0075 8 4 1 8 16 >8 >128 >16 >16
839 >64 0.06 0.12 0.0075 16 4 1 4 >32 >8 >128 >16 >16
862 >64 0.06 0.06 0.0075 8 4 2 16 >32 >8 >128 16 >16
863 >64 0.03 0.03 0.0075 8 4 1 0.25 0.5 1 2 0.25 0.25
886 >64 >16 >16 0.0075 4 4 1 4 8 >8 >128 4 4
896 >64 >16 >16 0.0075 4 4 1 4 8 >8 >128 >16 8
897 >64 >16 >16 0.0075 4 4 1 4 8 >8 >128 >16 8
924 64 0.03 0.06 0.0075 2 4 2 16 8 >8 64 4 4
945 >64 >16 >16 0.06 32 4 1 16 16 >8 4 2 0.5
947 >64 >16 >16 0.0075 4 2 1 4 4 >8 1 0.25 0.25
957 >64 >16 >16 0.0075 16 8 32 0.5 4 >8 8 0.5 1
1007 >64 0.03 0.06 0.0075 4 8 2 8 4 >8 16 4 2
1026 >64 0.06 0.25 0.0075 8 4 2 8 4 >8 >128 0.5 0.5
1167 >64 >16 >16 0.0075 8 2 2 2 0.5 0.25 4 0.25 0.5
1408 >64 >16 >16 0.06 4 2 2 >32 1 0.25 8 2 1
1557 >64 >16 >16 0.06 32 4 1 32 8 >8 8 4 2
1569 >64 >16 >16 0.06 32 8 1 8 4 >8 4 0.25 0.5
1761 >64 >16 >16 0.03 16 2 1 4 2 >8 2 2 0.5
1762 >64 >16 >16 0.03 16 2 1 4 2 <0.25 2 2 0.5
1863 >64 >16 >16 0.0075 16 2 2 16 32 8 4 1 0.5
1942 >64 >16 16 0.06 16 8 2 32 16 >8 2 1 0.5
1974 >64 >16 >16 0.015 16 2 0.5 32 >32 >8 2 2 2
2025 >64 >16 16 0.0075 32 1 1 16 1 8 >128 16 16
2026 >64 16 16 0.015 32 1 1 16 4 8 >128 16 16
2089 >64 >16 >16 0.12 64 4 1 32 32 8 2 1 0.25
2111 >64 >16 >16 0.25 16 4 2 32 >32 8 4 1 0.5
2129 >64 >16 >16 0.25 32 4 2 8 8 <0.25 >128 >16 >16
2175 >64 >16 >16 0.12 64 8 8 1 1 <0.25 8 0.5 1
a

AMP, ampicillin; CRO, ceftriaxone; CTX, cefotaxime; MEM, meropenem; AMC, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid; AMK, amikacin; GEN, gentamicin; TET, tetracycline; CHL, chloramphenicol; SXT, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; NAL, nalidixic acid; CIP, ciprofloxacin; OFX, ofloxacin.

b

Boldface numbers represent the isolates that are resistant to the tested antimicrobial agents.

To investigate the transmissibility of the qnrS gene and the genetic contexts, all 34 qnrS-bearing strains were subjected to conjugation assays. The qnrS2 gene from 11 isolates and the corresponding resistance phenotype were successfully transferred to Escherichia coli J53, suggesting that the 11 isolates harbored the qnrS2-positive genetic structures in conjugative plasmids or other mobilizable genetic elements. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis with S1 nuclease (S1-PFGE) revealed that the qnrS2 gene in both parental strains and transconjugants was harbored by a plasmid of approximately 190 kb (Fig. 2). The MIC values of ciprofloxacin in the transconjugants were enhanced significantly compared with the recipient, rising from 0.015 to 1~4 μg/mL (Table 2). In addition, the levels of resistance to ampicillin, cefotaxime, tetracycline, chloramphenicol, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole were also found to have increased significantly in the transconjugants.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

S1-PFGE profiles of the donor strains (Vibrio species strains 704, 1408, and 1557) and the corresponding transconjugants (C704, C1408, and C1557). Lane M: XbaI-digested genomic DNA fragments of Salmonella enterica serotype Braenderup H9812 were included as the size marker. The red arrow indicates the bands of conjugative plasmid.

TABLE 2.

Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of conjugative qnrS2-carrying Vibrio strains and the corresponding transconjugants

Strain ID Species MIC (μg/mL)a,b
AMP CRO CTX MEM AMC AMK GEN TET CHL SXT NAL CIP OFX
301 V. alginolyticus >64 0.12 0.06 0.015 8 1 1 16 32 >8 8 1 1
C301 E. coli J53 32 0.06 0.06 006 4 2 0.5 >32 >32 >8 4 1 0.5
661 V. alginolyticus >64 >16 >16 0.06 32 2 1 16 32 >8 8 2 1
C661 E. coli J53 8 0.06 0.06 0.015 2 1 0.06 >32 >32 >8 16 4 1
704 V. alginolyticus >64 >16 >16 0.12 8 2 1 32 16 >8 4 4 1
C704 E. coli J53 >64 4 8 0.06 >64 1 0.5 >32 >32 >8 16 4 1
945 V. alginolyticus >64 >16 >16 0.06 32 4 1 16 16 >8 4 2 0.5
C945 E. coli J53 >64 4 8 0.03 >64 2 0.5 >32 >32 >8 16 4 1
957 V. Parahaemolyticus >64 >16 >16 0.0075 16 8 32 0.5 4 >8 8 0.5 1
C957 E. coli J53 >64 0.06 0.06 0.06 >64 2 0.5 8 >32 >8 32 2 2
1408 V. alginolyticus >64 >16 >16 0.06 4 2 2 >32 1 0.25 8 2 1
C1408 E. coli J53 >64 4 8 4 >64 0.5 0.5 >32 >32 2 32 4 2
1557 V. alginolyticus >64 >16 >16 0.06 32 4 1 32 8 >8 8 4 2
C1557 E. coli J53 16 0.06 0.06 0.03 4 0.5 0.25 >32 4 >8 16 4 4
1942 V. alginolyticus >64 >16 16 0.06 16 8 2 32 16 >8 2 1 0.5
C1942 E. coli J53 64 4 4 0.12 >64 0.5 1 >32 >32 >8 16 2 1
1974 V. alginolyticus >64 >16 >16 0.015 16 2 0.5 32 >32 >8 2 2 2
C1974 E. coli J53 8 0.06 0.06 0.03 4 1 0.5 >32 4 >8 16 2 1
2089 V. alginolyticus >64 >16 >16 0.12 64 4 1 32 32 8 2 1 0.25
C2089 E. coli J53 64 4 8 4 >64 1 0.5 >32 >32 >8 32 4 2
2111 V. Parahaemolyticus >64 >16 >16 0.25 16 4 2 32 >32 8 4 1 0.5
C2111 E. coli J53 >64 4 4 0.25 >64 1 0.12 >32 >32 >8 16 2 1
J53AZR E. coli 2 0.06 0.06 0.015 4 1 0.25 0.5 4 0.25 2 0.015 0.015
a

AMP, ampicillin; CRO, ceftriaxone; CTX, cefotaxime; MEM, meropenem; AMC, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid; AMK, amikacin; GEN, gentamicin; TET, tetracycline; CHL, chloramphenicol; SXT, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; NAL, nalidixic acid; CIP, ciprofloxacin; OFX, ofloxacin.

b

Boldface numbers represent the isolates that are resistant to the tested antimicrobial agents.

Genome sequencing analysis of qnrS-carrying isolates identified in this study showed that the qnrS2 genes could be located in the chromosome or the plasmids, whereas all the qnrS5 genes recovered from this study were located in the chromosome (Fig. 1). The genetic environment of the plasmid-borne qnrS2 gene could be categorized into two distinct groups (plasmid types I and II), involving one conjugative plasmid and one nonconjugative plasmid. Ten isolates carrying the chromosomal qnrS2 gene exhibited two distinct gene environments, nine of which were surrounded by genes encoding conjugal transfer proteins (chromosome type I). Only one strain, 2129, was flanked by genes encoding the transposase-related proteins and the transmembrane protein (chromosome type II). The genetic context of qnrS5-harboring isolates was divided into two types (chromosome types III and IV). However, none of the qnrS5 genes were surrounded by transposons, which differed from the qnrS2 genes (Fig. 3). Phylogenetic analysis showed that Vibrio species strains carrying similar qnrS-carrying mobile elements tended to cluster together, but they were not clonally related (Fig. 1).

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Schematic representation of different genetic structures surrounding the qnrS gene in Vibrio strains. The nucleotide sequences of the qnrS2-bearing region in plasmids pC704 and p1762 were selected as the representatives of plasmid types I and II, respectively. Selected sequences of strain 839 and strain 2129 were used to elucidate the genetic environment of chromosomal qnrS2 types I and II. Selected sequences of strain 2175 and strain 818 were used to elucidate the genetic environment of chromosomal qnrS5 types III and IV. Predicted genes are shown as arrows, and their orientation of transcription is indicated by arrowheads. The arrow size is proportional to the length of predicted genes. Predicted genes with different functions are colored as follows: red, qnrS genes; blue, mobile element genes; orange, genes encoding hypothetical proteins and other functional proteins.

Plasmids were extracted from six of the total transconjugants (C661, C704, C1408, C1557, C2089, and C2111) and were completely sequenced with the long-read Nanopore MinION platform. Sequence analysis showed that the qnrS2 gene was located in the same plasmid in these six strains. The plasmid isolated from strain C704 was selected as the representative for investigation of the genetic features of the qnrS2-bearing conjugative plasmids. This conjugative qnrS2-bearing plasmid was 193,433 bp in length, contained 228 predicted coding sequences (CDSs), and exhibited a GC content of 44.20%. This plasmid harbored different genes, including resistance genes, mobile genetic elements, genes that encode conjugative transfer functions, and hypothetical protein-coding genes. Annotation results showed that qnrS2 was surrounded by hypothetical protein-coding genes and genes that encode chromosome-partitioning proteins ParA and ParB, and an IS903 family transposase gene was located downstream. After comparison with the plasmid replicon database, the predicted replication initiation gene rep in pC704 could not be classified into any of the known incompatibility groups by PlasmidFinder. A blastn search showed that the plasmid pC704 was highly similar (≥75% coverage and >99.8% identity) to pAQU-type plasmids recorded in the NCBI database, including plasmid pVPS62 (GenBank ID KX957971.1), p2 (CP030801.1), pC1579 (MN865127.1), pVPSD2016-2 (CP034301.1), pVPH1 (KP688397.1), and pVPS43 (KX957970.1). Comparison of the circular and linear images of pC704 with other similar pAQU-type plasmids showed that genetic variations were mainly located in the MDR region (Fig. 4a and b). The MDR region of pC704 was found to contain the sulfonamide resistance genes (sul1 and sul2), chloramphenicol resistance gene (catA2), aminoglycoside resistance gene (aadA1), β-lactam resistance genes (blaCARB-12 and blaVMB-2), and the tetracycline resistance gene (tetB); these genes were surrounded by various insertion sequences and the Tn3 transposon. It should be noted that an MDR-coding cluster, sul1-aadA1-blaCARB-12-blaVMB-2, was flanked by two copies of ISCR1. A tetracycline resistance gene tetB was flanked by two copies of IS10L. This MDR region exhibited a high degree of similarity to that of a plasmid, pRA3, which was isolated from Aeromonas hydrophila. However, two β-lactam resistance genes (blaCARB-12 and blaVMB-2) harbored by pC704 were absent in plasmid pRA3 (Fig. 4c). Strikingly, the qnrS2 resistance gene harbored by pC704 was absent in other pAQU-type plasmids. Further sequence comparative analysis of other qnrS2-carrying isolates revealed that 11 conjugative isolates possessed a structurally similar pAQU-type plasmid backbone and could be grouped into plasmid type I. Two qnrS2-carrying isolates, strains 301 and 957 (the plasmids of which were designated p301 and p957, respectively), which were also included in this group, were found to possess a plasmid with a similar backbone but structurally different MDR region (Fig. 4d). To be more specific, instead of carrying an IS6100-sul1-catA2-ISCR1-sul1-aadA1-blaCARB-12-blaVMB-2-ISCR1 MDR cluster in pC704, there was a sul2-strA-strB MDR-coding gene cassette flanked by ISVa11 and ISKox2 in plasmid p301 and a floR-strB-strA-sul2 MDR-coding cluster surrounded by ISVsa3 and ISShfr9 in plasmid p957.

FIG 4.

FIG 4

Comparison of the genetic characteristics of the pAQU-like plasmid carrying qnrS2 recovered in this study and structurally similar plasmids using BRIG and Easyfig. (a) The complete sequence of pC704 (the outer circle) was used as a reference plasmid. The circular maps of the plasmids were generated using BRIG software and are depicted in the following order (inner to outer circles): pVPS62 (KX957971.1), p2 (CP030801.1), pC1579 (MN865127.1), pVPSD2016-2 (CP034301.1), pVPH1 (KP688397.1), pVPS43 (KX957970.1), and pC704. (b) Linear alignment of plasmid pC704 with two structurally similar plasmids pC1579 and pVPS62. (c) Linear alignment of the MDR region of pC704, pVPS62, and plasmid pRA3 (DQ401103.1). (d) Linear alignment of plasmid pC704 with two structurally similar qnrS2-bearing plasmids detected in this study, namely, p301 and p957.

The gene context of the nontransferable qnrS2 gene found in this study was highly similar to that of a novel plasmid, pVb1762 (accession number OK146920), which was reported by our laboratory previously (Fig. 5) and was designated plasmid type II. In this novel plasmid, qnrS2 was flanked by ISVpa4 and genes encoding hypothetical proteins. An MDR region within an 18,115-bp composite transposon, ISShfr9-ISVsa3-floR-strB-tetA-strB-strA-sul2-ISShfr9, was located in this plasmid. Upstream of this transposon structure was an MDR cassette in which various resistance genes were flanked by the TnAs2 and ISCR1 elements. Another PMQR determinant, qnrVC10, which was accompanied by two ISVba1, was also located in this plasmid. Conjugation experiments showed that this qnrS2-bearing plasmid was not transferrable to the recipient strain.

FIG 5.

FIG 5

Genetic characteristics of the nonconjugative plasmids carrying qnrS2. The plasmid pVb1762 (accession number OK146920) was used as a reference to compare with other structurally similar plasmids.

DISCUSSION

Vibrio species are bacterial pathogens that may cause food contamination at various stages of food processing from production to consumption. In our previous study, we reported the screening of qnrVC genes in a total of 1,811 Vibrio species strains isolated from 2,051 food samples (including pork, beef, chicken, and shrimp) purchased in Shenzhen, Guangdong province, China, during the period from August 2015 to April 2017 (20). In this study, we conducted a comprehensive characterization of Vibrio species strains carrying qnrS, the gene commonly reported to mediate expression of phenotypic ciprofloxacin resistance in other Gram-negative pathogens such as Salmonella (19, 21). To date, qnrS is mainly detected in Aeromonas spp. and Enterobacter spp. but rarely in isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudoalteromonas, Pseudomonas, Shigella flexneri, and Shewanella. Reports of detection of qnrS in Vibrio spp. are also rare.

Overuse and abused usage of fluoroquinolones in aquaculture and health care facilities in the past decade resulted in a marked increase in the prevalence of quinolone resistance (22). Acquisition of the ability to express quinolone resistance is principally associated with mutational changes in the QRDR of the gyrA and parC genes. However, recent studies showed that PMQR genes are able to confer low levels of quinolone resistance and complement other chromosomal mechanisms, resulting in higher levels of resistance. Consistently, data from our study showed that carriage of qnrS or other PMQR genes, such as qnrVC and qnrA, without mutations in the QRDR in Vibrio spp. enabled the MIC range toward ciprofloxacin to vary from 0.25 mg/mL to 4 mg/mL. Such genes were also detectable among the qnrS-positive Vibrio isolates. Eleven of the total qnrS-bearing isolates were found to harbor point mutations in the QRDRs, with the Ser83Ile substitution in GyrA being the most frequently detected amino acid substitution. Isolates with a single QRDR mutation exhibited resistance toward ciprofloxacin, with MIC values ranging from 4 mg/mL to 16 mg/mL, whereas QRDR mutation together with single or multiple PMQR genes exhibited high-level resistance. It is noticeable that the QRDR mutation sites in V. parahaemolyticus and V. alginolyticus strains were different. It appeared that mutations in both the gyrA and parC genes occurred only in V. alginolyticus isolates, whereas the V. parahaemolyticus isolates only possessed a single mutation at codon 83 of the gyrA gene or codon 85 of the parC gene. However, several reports indicated that point mutations in gyrA at position 83 (Ser→Ile) and parC at position 85 (Ser→Leu) were also detected in strains of V. parahaemolyticus isolated from food samples (23, 24). This discrepancy between V. parahaemolyticus and V. alginolyticus might be the result of limited numbers of strains included in this study. These findings suggest that PMQR genes contributed significantly to the development of ciprofloxacin resistance in Vibrio spp.

Our study showed that the qnrS5 gene was frequently located in the chromosome of Vibrio species strains and that qnrS2 could be found in both the chromosome and plasmids. The qnrS2 allele has been commonly found in IncQ, IncU, and ColE-type plasmids. In these plasmids, qnrS2 is part of a mobile insertion cassette, which lacks the transposase gene but is flanked by 22-bp imperfect inverted repeats and 5-bp direct repeats. Recently, a new surrounding genetic structure has been described for the qnrS2 gene, in which qnrS2 was flanked by two IS26 elements (5). However, sequence analysis of qnrS2-carrying isolates in this study did not observe the gene environment described above, indicating that a distinct genetic context was involved in dissemination of the qnrS2 gene among Vibrio spp. The genetic environment of the plasmid-borne qnrS2 genes identified in this study could be divided into two distinct groups (plasmid types I and II), which involve one conjugative plasmid and one nonconjugative plasmid. The qnrS2-harboring conjugative plasmid has a backbone similar to that of the pAQU-type plasmids but contains different resistance genes. The pAQU-type plasmids, namely, pAQU1 and pAQU2, were first identified in marine pathogens in Japan (23, 24) and were subsequently disseminated as MDR conjugative plasmids to important bacterial pathogens in Asia. Bacterial strains harboring the pAQU group plasmids mainly belong to Vibrio spp. and Photobacterium damselae subsp. damselae, suggesting that such plasmids are mainly maintained and disseminated in the aquatic environment and are therefore responsible for the dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) among marine bacteria (25). It was speculated that integration of various mobile elements, such as IS10, ISCR1, IS91, and IS6100, into the plasmid backbone was the key mechanism by which exogenous resistance genes were acquired during the evolution process (24). However, the qnrS2 gene observed in our study was surrounded by a variety of hypothetical protein-coding genes. The functions of these hypothetical proteins need to be further investigated. Conjugation experiments in this study demonstrated that the qnrS2-carrying pAQU-type plasmids could be transferred from Vibrio spp. to E. coli J53 and caused a reduction in the susceptibility of E. coli J53 to fluoroquinolones. Moreover, the MIC value of two cephalosporins, cefotaxime and ceftriaxone, in some of the transconjugants also increased from 0.06 μg/mL to 1~4 μg/mL. The MIC data showed that most of these isolates were able to transfer the conjugative plasmid that encodes coresistance to two clinically important antibiotics, ciprofloxacin and cephalosporins, to the recipient strain. The unique features observable in the genetic environments of the qnrS2 gene carried by foodborne Vibrio isolates in this study and those of the previously reported qnrS2-carrying strains indicated that active evolution and dissemination of qnrS2 occur among strains of Vibrio spp. Our findings therefore suggest that foodborne bacteria, such as those of the Vibrio spp., constitute a key reservoir of resistance genes, which may be transmissible to other human pathogens during food production and processing.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Screening of the qnrS gene.

Food-borne Vibrio isolates were collected from wet markets and supermarkets in Shenzhen, Guangdong province, China, during the period between August 2015 and April 2017, as reported in our former study (20). Bacterial DNA was extracted using the rapid boiling method (26); the qnrS gene was screened by a previously described PCR method (27). The qnrS-positive isolates were then subjected to molecular screening for qnrA, qnrB, qnrC, qnrD, qnrVC, aac(6′)lb-cr, and oqxAB, as previously described (28). Subsequently, qnrS-bearing isolates were subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility tests following the standard agar dilution method as described by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (29). Escherichia coli strain ATCC 25922 and Staphylococcus aureus strain ATCC 29213 were used as quality control strains. The resistance breakpoints published by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute were used in the tests (30). All 34 qnrS-carrying isolates were sequenced by the Illumina platform and subjected to further analysis. Subsequently, MLST analysis was performed by following the guidelines of PubMLST (https://pubmlst.org/organisms/vibriospp).

Filter mating assay and S1-PFGE.

Conjugation assays were performed to evaluate the transferability of qnrS-carrying genetic elements. E. coli strain J53 AZR was used as the recipient strain. The donor and recipient strains were grown at a log phase in LB broth and mixed at a donor:recipient ratio of 1:3 and applied to a 0.22-μm filter, followed by culturing at 37°C for 16 h. Transconjugants were selected on eosin methylene blue (EMB) agar plates containing 0.5 μg/mL ciprofloxacin and 100 μg/mL sodium azide. The genetic identity of transconjugants harboring qnrS was confirmed by PCR, and the MIC values of various antibiotics were determined for the transconjugants as described above. To investigate the qnrS-bearing plasmid profiles of qnrS-positive strains and their transconjugants, total DNA was digested with S1 nuclease, followed by PFGE with the CHEF MAPPER system (Bio-Rad, CA, USA) (31).

Plasmid sequencing and bioinformatic analysis.

Plasmids were collected from the test strains by using the Qiagen plasmid midi kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). The Illumina platform and the Nanopore MinION long-read sequencing platform were used to generate the draft whole-plasmid maps. The Illumina paired-end libraries were prepared by using the NEBNext Ultra DNA library prep kit for Illumina (New England Biolabs) and sequenced on an Illumina NextSeq 500 platform. The library for MinION sequencing was prepared using the Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) sequencing kit (rapid barcoding kit 96; SQK-RBK110.96). De novo assemblies of MinION long reads and Illumina reads were generated by using SPAdes 3.12.1 (32) and the CLC Genomics Workbench (CLC bio, Denmark), respectively. Long assembled contigs obtained from MinION long reads were used to align and join the contigs obtained from the Illumina assembly results. The completed plasmid sequence was annotated by the RAST tool (33) and the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP). The phylogenetic tree of these Vibrio species strains was constructed using Roary (34) and FastTree (35) based on the single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the core genomes. BRIG (36) and Easyfig (37) were used to generate multiple and pairwise sequences for comparison of the plasmids tested in this study.

Data availability.

The plasmid sequence of the pAQU-type conjugative plasmid pC704 found in this study was submitted to the NCBI database with accession number OP958859.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research study was supported by the Shenzhen Key Project for Basic Research (JCYJ20200109143220716) and Sichuan Province Science and Technology Planning Project (grant number 2021YFSY0005).

We have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Y.X. performed the research work and data analysis. Z.Z. helped with Vibrio isolation. L.Y. helped with sequencing and bioinformatic analysis. E.W.-C.C., Y.X., and S.C. participated in research design and manuscript writing. S.C. supervised the whole project.

Contributor Information

Sheng Chen, Email: sheng.chen@polyu.edu.hk.

Ana-Maria Dragoi, Yale University.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Kumarage PM, De Silva LADS, Heo GJ. 2022. Aquatic environments: a potential source of antimicrobial-resistant Vibrio spp. J Appl Microbiol 133:2267–2279. doi: 10.1111/jam.15702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Picó Y, Andreu V. 2007. Fluoroquinolones in soil—risks and challenges. Anal Bioanal Chem 387:1287–1299. doi: 10.1007/s00216-006-0843-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wong KC, Brown AM, Luscombe GM, Wong SJ, Mendis K. 2015. Antibiotic use for Vibrio infections: important insights from surveillance data. BMC Infect Dis 15:226. doi: 10.1186/s12879-015-0959-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rodríguez-Martínez JM, Machuca J, Cano ME, Calvo J, Martínez-Martínez L, Pascual A. 2016. Plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance: two decades on. Drug Resist Updat 29:13–29. doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2016.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tao Y, Zhou K, Xie L, Xu Y, Han L, Ni Y, Qu J, Sun J. 2020. Emerging coexistence of three PMQR genes on a multiple resistance plasmid with a new surrounding genetic structure of qnrS2 in E. coli in China. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 9:52. doi: 10.1186/s13756-020-00711-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yamane K, Wachino J-i, Suzuki S, Kimura K, Shibata N, Kato H, Shibayama K, Konda T, Arakawa Y. 2007. New plasmid-mediated fluoroquinolone efflux pump, QepA, found in an Escherichia coli clinical isolate. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51:3354–3360. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00339-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zhao J-y, Zhao S-m, Mu X-d, Xiao Z. 2016. Genetic characterization of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance gene qnrS2 in Pseudoalteromonas and Shewanella isolates from seawater. FEMS Microbiology Lett 364:fnw295. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnw295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yang Q, Zhao M, Wang K-Y, Wang J, He Y, Wang E-L, Liu T, Chen D-F, Lai W. 2017. Multidrug-resistant Aeromonas veronii recovered from channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) in China: prevalence and mechanisms of fluoroquinolone resistance. Microb Drug Resist 23:473–479. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2015.0296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cao Z, Cui L, Liu Q, Liu F, Zhao Y, Guo K, Hu T, Zhang F, Sheng X, Wang X, Peng Z, Dai M. 2022. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of multidrug-resistant Enterobacter hormaechei carrying qnrS gene isolated from chicken feed in China. Microbiol Spectr 10:e02518-21. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02518-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pu X-Y, Gu Y, Li J, Song S-J, Lu Z. 2018. Characterization of the complete sequences and stability of plasmids carrying the genes aac(6′)-Ib-cr or qnrS in Shigella flexneri in the Hangzhou area of China. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 34:72. doi: 10.1007/s11274-018-2454-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hata M, Suzuki M, Matsumoto M, Takahashi M, Sato K, Ibe S, Sakae K. 2005. Cloning of a novel gene for quinolone resistance from a transferable plasmid in Shigella flexneri 2b. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49:801–803. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.2.801-803.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kehrenberg C, Friederichs S, de Jong A, Michael GB, Schwarz S. 2006. Identification of the plasmid-borne quinolone resistance gene qnrS in Salmonella enterica serovar Infantis. J Antimicrob Chemother 58:18–22. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkl213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mayers DL, Sobel JD, Ouellette M, Kaye KS, Marchaim D. 2017. Antimicrobial drug resistance: clinical and epidemiological aspects, vol 2. Springer, Cham, Switzerland. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kehrenberg C, Hopkins KL, Threlfall EJ, Schwarz S. 2007. Complete nucleotide sequence of a small qnrS1-carrying plasmid from Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica Typhimurium DT193. J Antimicrob Chemother 60:903–905. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkm283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Poirel L, Cattoir V, Soares A, Soussy C-J, Nordmann P. 2007. Novel Ambler class A β-lactamase LAP-1 and its association with the plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance determinant QnrS1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51:631–637. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01082-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Robicsek A, Sahm D, Strahilevitz J, Jacoby G, Hooper D. 2005. Broader distribution of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance in the United States. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49:3001–3003. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.7.3001-3003.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Garinet S, Fihman V, Jacquier H, Corvec S, Le Monnier A, Guillard T, Cattoir V, Zahar J-R, Woerther P-L, Carbonnelle E, Wargnier A, Kernéis S, Morand PC, GMC . 2018. Elective distribution of resistance to beta-lactams among Enterobacter cloacae genetic clusters. J Infect 77:178–182. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2018.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pfeifer Y, Cullik A, Witte W. 2010. Resistance to cephalosporins and carbapenems in Gram-negative bacterial pathogens. Int J Med Microbiol 300:371–379. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2010.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chen K, Dong N, Chan EW-C, Chen S. 2019. Transmission of ciprofloxacin resistance in Salmonella mediated by a novel type of conjugative helper plasmids. Emerg Microbes Infect 8:857–865. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2019.1626197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Xu Y, Zheng Z, Ye L, Chan EW-c, Chen S. 2023. High prevalence of qnrVC variants in Vibrio spp. isolated from food samples in South China. Microbiol Res 267:127261. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2022.127261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chen K, Dong N, Zhao S, Liu L, Li R, Xie M, Lin D, Wai-Chi Chan E, Meng J, McDermott PF, Chen S. 2018. Identification and characterization of conjugative plasmids that encode ciprofloxacin resistance in Salmonella. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e00575-18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00575-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cabello FC, Godfrey HP, Tomova A, Ivanova L, Dölz H, Millanao A, Buschmann AH. 2013. Antimicrobial use in aquaculture re-examined: its relevance to antimicrobial resistance and to animal and human health. Environ Microbiol 15:1917–1942. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nonaka L, Maruyama F, Miyamoto M, Miyakoshi M, Kurokawa K, Masuda M. 2012. Novel conjugative transferable multiple drug resistance plasmid pAQU1 from Photobacterium damselae subsp. damselae isolated from marine aquaculture environment. Microbes Environ 27:263–272. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.me11338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Nonaka L, Maruyama F, Onishi Y, Kobayashi T, Ogura Y, Hayashi T, Suzuki S, Masuda M. 2014. Various pAQU plasmids possibly contribute to disseminate tetracycline resistance gene tet(M) among marine bacterial community. Front Microbiol 5:152. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Li R, Ye L, Wong MHY, Zheng Z, Chan EWC, Chen S. 2017. Evolution and comparative genomics of pAQU-like conjugative plasmids in Vibrio species. J Antimicrob Chemother 72:2503–2506. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Han JE, Kim JH, Cheresca CH Jr., Shin SP, Jun JW, Chai JY, Han SY, Park SC. 2012. First description of the qnrS-like (qnrS5) gene and analysis of quinolone resistance-determining regions in motile Aeromonas spp. from diseased fish and water. Res Microbiol 163:73–79. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2011.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Arias A, Seral C, Navarro F, Miro E, Coll P, Castillo F. 2010. Plasmid-mediated QnrS2 determinant in an Aeromonas caviae isolate recovered from a patient with diarrhoea. Clin Microbiol Infect 16:1005–1007. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.02958.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lin D, Chen K, Wai-Chi Chan E, Chen S. 2015. Increasing prevalence of ciprofloxacin-resistant food-borne Salmonella strains harboring multiple PMQR elements but not target gene mutations. Sci Rep 5:14754. doi: 10.1038/srep14754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lewis I, James S. 2022. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Jorgensen JH. 2010. Methods for antimicrobial dilution and disk susceptibility testing of infrequently isolated or fastidious bacteria; approved guideline. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Li R, Lin D, Chen K, Wong MHY, Chen S. 2015. First detection of AmpC β-lactamase blaCMY-2 on a conjugative IncA/C plasmid in a Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolate of food origin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:4106–4111. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05008-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, Olsen GJ, Davis JJ, Disz T, Edwards RA, Gerdes S, Parrello B, Shukla M, Vonstein V, Wattam AR, Xia F, Stevens R. 2014. The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res 42:D206–D214. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Page AJ, Cummins CA, Hunt M, Wong VK, Reuter S, Holden MT, Fookes M, Falush D, Keane JA, Parkhill J. 2015. Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics 31:3691–3693. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. 2009. FastTree: computing large minimum evolution trees with profiles instead of a distance matrix. Mol Biol Evol 26:1641–1650. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msp077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Alikhan N-F, Petty NK, Ben Zakour NL, Beatson SA. 2011. BLAST Ring Image Generator (BRIG): simple prokaryote genome comparisons. BMC Genomics 12:402. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sullivan MJ, Petty NK, Beatson SA. 2011. Easyfig: a genome comparison visualizer. Bioinformatics 27:1009–1010. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The plasmid sequence of the pAQU-type conjugative plasmid pC704 found in this study was submitted to the NCBI database with accession number OP958859.


Articles from Microbiology Spectrum are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES