Abstract
Sensory adaptations to squint are considered in the light of present knowledge of the visual sensory system. A model to assist our understanding of the clinical presentation of sensory adaptation is proposed. Suppression and abnormal correspondence are considered as anomalies of different parts of the sensory system, and the interplay of these adaptations is reviewed.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- HUBEL D. H., WIESEL T. N. RECEPTIVE FIELDS AND FUNCTIONAL ARCHITECTURE IN TWO NONSTRIATE VISUAL AREAS (18 AND 19) OF THE CAT. J Neurophysiol. 1965 Mar;28:229–289. doi: 10.1152/jn.1965.28.2.229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ikeda H., Wright M. J. Is amblyopia due to inappropriate stimulation of the "sustained" pathway during development? Br J Ophthalmol. 1974 Mar;58(3):165–175. doi: 10.1136/bjo.58.3.165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McIlwain J. T. Visual receptive fields and their images in superior colliculus of the cat. J Neurophysiol. 1975 Mar;38(2):219–230. doi: 10.1152/jn.1975.38.2.219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Robinson D. A. Eye movements evoked by collicular stimulation in the alert monkey. Vision Res. 1972 Nov;12(11):1795–1808. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(72)90070-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schneider G. E. Two visual systems. Science. 1969 Feb 28;163(3870):895–902. doi: 10.1126/science.163.3870.895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]