Skip to main content
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases logoLink to PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
. 2023 Jul 31;17(7):e0011453. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011453

Candida haemulonii complex, an emerging threat from tropical regions?

Ugo Françoise 1,¤a, Marie Desnos-Ollivier 2, Yohann Le Govic 1,¤b, Karine Sitbon 2, Ruddy Valentino 3, Sandrine Peugny 4, Taieb Chouaki 5, Edith Mazars 6, André Paugam 7, Muriel Nicolas 8, Nicole Desbois-Nogard 1,#, Olivier Lortholary 2,9,10,*,#; French Mycoses Study Group
Editor: Joshua Nosanchuk11
PMCID: PMC10437918  PMID: 37523406

Abstract

Background

Candida haemulonii complex-related species are pathogenic yeasts closely related to Candida auris with intrinsic antifungal resistance, but few epidemiological data are available.

Methodology/Principal findings

We analyzed clinical and demographic characteristics of patients with fungemia due to C. haemulonii complex and related species (C. pseudohaemulonii, C. vulturna) reported in France during 2002–2021, and compared them to data of C. parapsilosis fungemia, as they all can be commensal of the skin. We also conducted a study on adult inpatients and outpatients colonized by C. haemulonii complex, managed at the University Hospital of Martinique during 2014–2020. Finally, we performed a literature review of fungemia due to C. haemulonii complex and related species reported in Medline (1962–2022).

In total, we identified 28 fungemia due to C. haemulonii complex in France. These episodes were frequently associated with bacterial infection (38%) and high mortality rate (44%), and differed from C. parapsilosis fungemia by their tropical origin, mainly from Caribbean and Latin America. All isolates showed decreased in vitro susceptibility to amphotericin B and fluconazole. In Martinique, we found that skin colonization was frequent in the community population, while colonization was strongly associated with the presence of foreign devices in ICU patients. The literature review identified 274 fungemia episodes, of which 56 were individually described. As in our national series, published cases originated mainly from tropical regions and exhibited high crude mortality.

Conclusions/Significance

Multidrug-resistant C. haemulonii complex-related species are responsible for fungemia and colonization in community and hospital settings, especially in tropical regions, warranting closer epidemiological surveillance to prevent a potential C. auris-like threat.

Author summary

Yeasts of the C. haemulonii complex (C. haemulonii sensu stricto, C. duobushaemulonii, C. haemulonii var. vulnera) and related species (C. pseudohaemulonii and C. vulturna), are phylogenetically close to Candida auris, but their distribution, pathophysiology and antifungal resistance profiles are poorly known. This work provides the first epidemiological data on these yeasts in France. Fungemia caused by these yeasts were mainly identified in tropical overseas regions (French West Indies, French Guiana), and occurred in patients with risk factors for candidemia, particularly a cutaneous portal of entry. This work highlights the skin carriage of these yeasts in these tropical regions, and their ability to colonize foreign devices. Like for Candida parapsilosis, catheters are the main pathway for fungemia but mortality seems higher with yeasts of the C. haemulonii complex and related. They commonly show in vitro resistance to many antifungal agents, notably fluconazole and amphotericin B, which are still frequently used as first and second-line treatments for candidemia worldwide. The findings from the literature review are consistent with these overall results. These observations justify closer epidemiological surveillance in the concerned regions to prevent a potential C. auris-like threat.

Introduction

Since the 2010s [1], multidrug-resistant Candida auris [2], with its ability to survive on prosthetic materials and spread among patients, has become a spreading healthcare-associated fungus [35]. Within the Metschnikowiaceae clade, yeasts of the Candida haemulonii complex (C. haemulonii sensu stricto, C. haemulonii var. vulnera, and C. duobushaemulonii), C. pseudohaemulonii, and C. vulturna are phylogenetically closely related to C. auris and share several pathogenicity-related traits, like adhesion on prosthetic materials [6,7] phenotypic switching [8], and multidrug resistance [7,911]. In fact, misidentifications by biochemical methods are frequent, even with updated databases [12]. Few cases of C. haemulonii complex infection have been reported since its description [13,14], but since the 2000s, several fungemia have been reported, especially in tropical areas [10,1517]. These yeasts present often high MICs for fluconazole [18], the first-line antifungal for treating fungemia in many low-income countries, and exhibit a decreased susceptibility to amphotericin B, often used as salvage therapy. Isolates of this complex are usually susceptible to echinocandins, although echinocandin-resistant strains have been isolated from human samples [19].

In France, rare yeasts are responsible for nearly 7.4% of fungemia [20] but there are no major epidemiological studies focused on this complex. Consequently, risk factors and clinical outcome of fungemia due to Candida haemulonii complex-related species remain largely unknown [21].

In this context, we carried out a study in mainland France and French overseas territories including (i) epidemiology of fungemia caused by C. haemulonii complex, C. pseudohaemulonii and C. vulturna (hereinafter referred to as “fungemia series”), (ii) a case-control study comparing these fungemia to those due to C. parapsilosis, a skin commensal, and (iii) a study of colonization in outpatients and inpatients admitted to intensive care units (ICU) in Martinique. Finally, we conducted a literature review on fungemia caused by these species during the past six decades.

Methods

Ethics statement

The fungemia series was carried out in compliance with French law and the declaration of Helsinki (as adopted in 2000) and was approved by the French Mycoses Study Group scientific council. The surveillance of the NRCMA was approved by the Institut Pasteur Institutional Review Board #1 (#2009–34/IRB) and the "Commission Nationale de l’Informatique et des Libertés" according to the French regulation. The study in Martinique has been approved by the IRB of the Martinique university hospital (#2020/064).

Epidemiology of fungemia in France

We collected clinical data related to fungemia caused by C. haemulonii complex, C. pseudohaemulonii and C. vulturna from two French databases, from their creation until 31st July 2021. Both programs were launched by the French National Reference Centre for Invasive Mycoses & Antifungals (NRCMA): the YEASTS surveillance program, initiated in 2002 with the participation of 27 university or cancer hospitals in the Paris area [22] and the French Surveillance Network of Invasive Fungal Infections (RESSIF) program, initiated in 2012 with the participation of 29 hospitals from mainland France and overseas [20].

Case-control study

The above-described series constitutes the case population. We chose fungemia caused by C. parapsilosis from the RESSIF database as the control population, rather than C. albicans because preliminary information revealed the presence of these study species on human skin.

Colonization in Martinique

We enrolled patients with sample containing C. haemulonii complex yeasts, considered to be non-pathogenic (i.e. not being responsible for infection), at the Martinique University hospital, between April 2014 and August 2020. We retained cases involving adult patients with putative community-acquired colonization (referred to as “outpatients”, including those hospitalized <48h) or hospitalized in ICU. Lack of pathogenicity was retained by the clinician according to clinical context and source of sampling.

Literature review

We performed a literature review on Medline database, from January 1st, 1962 to September 1st, 2022 with the following search terms in all fields: “Candida haemulonii” OR “Torulopsis haemulonii” OR “Candida duobushaemulonii” OR “Candida pseudohaemulonii” OR “Candida vulturna”. We included all reported cases of C. haemulonii complex, C. pseudohaemulonii, and C. vulturna fungemia identified by sequencing, for which individual clinical information and/or susceptibility to antifungals were available.

Isolate characterization

Fungemia series

All bloodstream isolates of C. haemulonii complex and related species were identified at the NRCMA by sequencing of ITS1–5.8S–ITS2 and D1/D2 regions of the ribosomal DNA, using V9D/LS266 and NL1/NL4 primers as previously described [23]. Antifungal susceptibility testing to micafungin, amphotericin B, and fluconazole, was performed using the broth microdilution method published by EUCAST (v 7.3.2 valid from 22 April, 2020), with a modification for micafungin medium as previously described [24].

Colonization in Martinique

From 2014 to 2017, yeasts were identified by culture on chromogenic media chromID Candida agar (BioMerieux, Marcy l’Étoile, France) combined with carbon assimilation testing using the API ID32C system (BioMerieux, Marcy l’Étoile, France). As no API code matches the complex, strains identification was made by matching profiles with those of an internal database of isolates previously identified by sequencing. Furthermore, carbon assimilation identification does not distinguish species within the complex, isolates were identified as C. haemulonii complex-related yeasts.

Since 2017, species identification has been performed routinely by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight mass spectroscopy (MALDI-TOF MS) using the Biotyper system (Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA, USA). Nine strains isolated before 2017 were rechecked, showing no discrepancy with biochemical analysis (S1 Table). Nonetheless, since the distinction between C. haemulonii sensu stricto and C. haemulonii var. vulnera is currently not possible without sequencing [25,26], such isolates only identified by MALDI-TOF MS were considered as C. haemulonii sensu lato or C. duobushaemulonii.

Statistical analysis

Analyses were performed on isolates from single episodes of fungemia, each isolate corresponding to a single patient. Associated factors were studied according to the species. We selected the variables significantly associated with any of the two groups at the threshold p<0.20. We developed an explanatory model using logistic regression, with a manual stepwise procedure guided by the Akaike Information Criterion. Explanatory model results were reported as adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Data were analyzed using R software (version 4.0.2). The map was created from a fla-shop.com background map (https://www.fla-shop.com/svg/, CC BY 4.0 license) modified with inkscape software.

Results

Fungemia series

Between October 1st, 2002, and July 31st, 2021, among the 12 032 candidemia episodes reported in YEASTS and RESSIF, 28 (0.23%) were caused by C. haemulonii complex, C. pseudohaemulonii, or C. vulturna (Table 1). The incidence appears to increase over time (S1 Fig), with 15/28 (53.6%) cases reported between 2017 and 2021. Notifications from the French West Indies and French Guiana accounted for 71.4% (20/28) of all cases.

Table 1. Characteristics of patients with fungemia due to C. haemulonii complex, C. pseudohaemulonii and C. vulturna in France between 2002 and 2021 (YEASTS and RESSIF programs), and C. parapsilosis in France between 2012 and 2021 (RESSIF).

Characteristics C. haemulonii complex-related species C. parapsilosis
Total 28 942
Hospital (%)
 Martinique university hospital (FWI) 10 (35.7) 62 (6.6)
 Cayenne hospital (French Guiana) 9 (32.1) 6 (0.6)
 Guadeloupe university hospital (FWI) 1 (3.6) 1 (0.1)
 Paris aera hospitals 5 (17.9) 200 (21.2)
 Other hospitals in mainland France 3 (10.7) 673 (71.4)
Birth continent (%)
 Africa 1/20 (5.0) 35/456 (7.6)
 America 18/20 (90.0) 62/456 (13.5)
 Europe 1/20 (5.0) 359/456 (78.2)
Travels during the previous year (%)
 Africa 2/22 (9.1) 14/216 (6.5)
 Latin America 2/22 (9.1) 1/216 (0.5)
 West Indies 4/22 (18.2) 48/216 (22.2)
 None 14/22 (63.6) 148/216 (68.5)
Median age in years [IQR] 67 [46–72] 62 [46–72]
Male (%) 16 (57.1) 625 (66.3)
Solid cancer (%) 8/24 (33.3) 281 (29.8)
Hematological malignancy (%) 5/26 (19.2) 118 (12.5)
Chronic kidney failure (%) 3/24 (12.5) 102 (10.8)
Liver cirrhosis (%) 2/24 (8.3) 43 (4.6)
Diabetes mellitus (%) 3/24 (12.5) 129 (13.7)
HIV (%) 2/23 (8.7) 13/412 (3.2)
Corticosteroidsa (%) 2 (7.1) 85 (9.0)
Other immunosuppressive treatment (%) 4 (14.3) 200 (21.2)
Surgery during the previous month (%) 10/26 (38.5) 358 (38.0)
Exposure to antifungal agent in the previous month (%)
 Amphotericin B 1/24 (4.2) 11/916 (1.2)
 Echinocandin 0 (0.0) 88/916 (9.6)
 Fluconazole 1/24 (4.2) 9/916 (1.0)
 Voriconazole 2/24 (8.3) 7/916 (0.8)
 Posaconazole 0 (0.0) 1/916 (0.1)
 Isavuconazole 0 (0.0) 5/916 (0.5)
 None 20/24 (83.3) 804/916 (87.7)
Central venous catheter (%) 15/22 (68.2) 693/753 (92.6)
Context of bacterial infection (%) 11/24 (45.8) 180 (19.1)
Intensive Care Unit (%) 10/26 (38.5) 315 (33.4)
Shock (%) 3/24 (12.5) 52 (5.5)
Antifungal treatment (%)
 Amphotericin B 0/26 (0.0) 46/922 (5.0)
 Echinocandin 15/26 (58.7) 472/922 (51.2)
 Fluconazole 3/26 (11.5) 313/922 (33.9)
 Itraconazole 1/26 (3.8) 0/922 (0.0)
 Voriconazole 0/26 (0.0) 16/922 (1.7)
 Posaconazole 0/26 (0.0) 3/922 (0.3)
 None 7/26 (26.9) 86/922 (9.3)
All-cause mortality at 3 months (%) 11/25 (44.0) 192/757 (25.4)
Median time to death in days [IQR] 18 [7–41] 8 [2–18]

FWI: French West Indies, IQR: Interquartile Range

a≥ 0.3mg/kg for ≥ 1 month

For each case, demographics, underlying conditions, initial antifungal treatment, and 3-month survival status were collected using a standardized questionnaire through a secure website.

The date of the fungemia corresponded to the date of the first positive blood culture.

Surgery and antifungal pre-exposure were considered in the 30 days prior to fungemia.

Subjects were mostly men (16, 57.1%) and the median age was 67 years (Interquartile Range (IQR) = 46–72); 81.4% of them lived or had stayed in tropical regions. Twenty-six patients (92.9%) had at least one of the following comorbidities: solid cancer, hematological malignancy, recent surgical procedure, central venous catheter, context of bacterial infection, hospitalization in ICU; Nine of them (32.1%) presented at least three of these comorbidities.

Four distinct species were identified. Candida haemulonii sensu stricto was the dominant species (16, 57.1%), followed by C. duobushaemulonii (8, 28.6%) and C. vulturna (3, 10.7%). C. pseudohaemulonii was identified once (1, 3.6%), whereas no C. haemulonii var. vulnera was retrieved. The distribution of species varied according to age, with a median age of 67 and 70 years for C. haemulonii and C. duobushaemulonii, respectively, compared with 46 and 27 years for C. pseudohaemulonii and C. vulturna, respectively.

Among the three patients who presented fungemia due to C. vulturna, two had a history of cancer and were pre-exposed to voriconazole, and 2 had recent surgery. The only C. pseudohaemulonii episode occurred in a 46-year-old woman from Brazil who was hospitalized in French Guiana for gastric linitis. She had no bacterial co-infection or recent surgery.

All-cause mortality at 3 months after diagnosis was 44% (11/25), of which 7 (63%) occurred in the first 30 days and 5 (45%) in the first 15 days. Mortality increased with age, from 3 (27.2%) in the <67 age group to 57.1% in the ≥67 age group. Two patients survived despite the absence of antifungal treatment. They were under 30 years old, had no underlying disease, and benefited from prompt catheter replacement.

Antifungal susceptibility testing could be performed on 23/28 strains. The median MIC values for amphotericin B are high, especially for C. duobushaemulonii (2 mg/l). Opposingly, those for fluconazole were lower for C. duobushaemulonii, yet still high (16 mg/l). The median MIC values for micafungin were ≤0.250 mg/l for all strains (Fig 1).

Fig 1. Susceptibility profiles to antifungals of the strains of the French fungemia series.

Fig 1

By EUCAST broth micro dilution reference method. C. duobushaemulonii = 7, C. haemulonii sensu stricto = 13, C. vulturna = 3. Bold black bar: median MIC value; Blue diamond: mean MIC value.

Case-control study

Between 2012 and 2021, 942 episodes of C. parapsilosis fungemia in adults were declared within the RESSIF database (Table 1). The geographical location of the patient in overseas territories was significantly associated with the development of C. haemulonii complex-related species fungemia (aOR = 70.77, 95%CI = 23.67–280.01), followed by the context of bacterial infection (aOR = 2.91, 95%CI = 1.10–7.64) (Fig 2A).

Fig 2. Explanatory models for the occurrence and the mortality of the fungemia.

Fig 2

a. Explanatory model for the occurrence of C. haemulonii complex, C. pseudohaemulonii or C. vulturna fungemia rather than C. parapsilosis (adjusted odds ratio from logistic regression coefficients with 95% confidence interval). b. Explanatory model for the death within 3 months of C. haemulonii complex, C. pseudohaemulonii, C. vulturna or C. parapsilosis fungemia (adjusted odds ratio from logistic regression coefficients with 95% confidence interval).

Three-month all-cause mortality was mainly associated with intensive care management and underlying comorbidities (Fig 2B). After adjusting for patient comorbidities, presence of bacterial infections, and level of care, fatal outcomes tended to be more frequent in C. haemulonii complex-related species fungemia than in C. parapsilosis fungemia (aOR = 2.39, 95%CI = 0.95–5.86).

Colonization in Martinique

We identified 119 C. haemulonii complex colonizations, in 116 adults with consultable medical records (S2 Fig). Of the 87 colonizations in outpatients (Table 2), 61 (70.1%) were cutaneous and 12 (13.8%) were ophthalmologic.

Table 2. Characteristics of patients with C. haemulonii complex colonization in university hospital of Martinique between 2014 and 2020.

Characteristics Outpatientsa Patients in ICUb
Total of events 87 17
Mean age in years (SD) 57.8 (16.7) 62.2 (17.6)
Male (%) 34 (39.1) 13 (76.5)
Birth continent (%)
 America 81 (93.1) 15 (88.2)
 Europe 6 (6.9) 2 (11.8)
Residence department (%)
 Côtes-d’Armor (Mainland France) 1 (1.1) 0 (0.0)
 Guadeloupe (FWI) 0 (0.0) 2 (11.8)
 Martinique (FWI) 86 (98.9) 15 (88.2)
Profession (%)
 Catering 3/77 (3.9) 0/15 (0.0)
 Construction 5/77 (6.5) 2/15 (13.3)
 Education 5/77 (6.5) 0/15 (0.0)
 Farmer 1/77 (1.3) 1/15 (6.7)
 Gardener 0 (0.0) 1/15 (6.7)
 Healthcare 14 (18.2) 0/15 (0.0)
 Retired 24/77 (31.2) 2/15 (13.3)
 Unemployed 12/77 (15.6) 3/15 (20.0)
 Other 13/77 (16.8) 2/15 (13.3)
Travels (%) 1/57 (1.8) 0/13 (0.0)
Aquatic activity (%) 2/21 (9.5) 0/2 (0.0)
Gardening (%) 6/21 (28.6) 1/2 (50.0)
Mean BMI in Kg/m2 (SD) 26.79 (7.6) 27.4 (8.2)
Solid cancer (%) 14 (16.1) 1 (5.9)
Hematological malignancy (%) 4 (4.6) 1 (5.9)
Solid organ transplant (%) 2 (2.3) 0 (0.0)
Diabetes mellitus (%) 21 (24.1) 4 (23.5)
Corticosteroids (%) 3 (3.4) 2 (11.8)
Immunosuppressive treatment (%) 9 (10.3) 0 (0.0)
HIV (%) 1 (1.1) 1 (5.9)
Other immunodepression (%) 9 (10.3) 1 (5.9)
Surgery during the previous month (%) 1 (1.1) 4 (23.5)
Exposure to antifungal agent in the previous month (%) 3 (3.4) 6 (35.3)
Median length of stay in hospital when sampling in days [IQR] 0.2 (0.5) 38.1 (35.7)
Sampling site (%)
 Ear, Nose, or Throat 4 (4.6) 1 (5.9)
 Genital 1 (1.1) 0 (0.0)
 Ophthalmologic 12 (13.8) 0 (0.0)
 Respiratory tract 9 (10.3) 12 (70.6)
 Pusc 0 (0.0) 2 (11.8)
 Skin 61 (70.1) 1 (5.9)
 Urine 0 (0.0) 1 (5.9)
Species (%)d
C. duobushaemulonii 14 (16.1) 7 (41.2)
C. haemulonii sensu lato 33 (37.9) 7 (41.2)
C. haemulonii sensu lato + C. duobushaemulonii 7 (8.0) 1 (5.9)
C. haemulonii complex 33 (37.9) 2 (11.8)

SD: Standard deviation; FWI: French West Indies; IQR: Interquartile Range

a Samples collected during ambulatory care (<48 hours of hospitalization)

b Samples collected in ICU at least 48 hours after admission

c Superficial swabbing, considered as skin contaminant

d Identification accuracy depending on the method used (biochemical, MALDI-TOF MS)

Outpatients with skin colonization were predominantly women (41/61, 67.2%); the mean age was 61.3 years; all lived in Martinique and 24.6% (15/61) were unemployed. Their main comorbidities were diabetes mellitus (12, 19.7%), solid cancer (12, 19.7%), and immune deficiency or immunosuppressive treatment (6, 9.8% and 5, 8.2%), respectively. Species identification within the complex was possible in 68.9% (42/61) of cases: 32 (76.2%) of C. haemulonii, 17 (40.4%) of C. duobushaemulonii, and 7 (16.6%) harboring both species. Of note, C. parapsilosis was concomitantly identified in 27 (44.3%) of these samples. Three patients presented 2 positive samples more than 1 month apart, but we could not assert that they were the same species.

Patients with ophthalmologic colonization were mostly women (7/12, 58.3%); the mean age was 35 years; all lived in Martinique and presented no comorbidity, except wearing contact lenses (100%). All had keratitis or corneal abscess due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Fusarium solani complex.

The 17 subjects of the ICU group (Table 2) were mostly men (13/17, 76.5%), with a mean age of 62.3 years, living exclusively in the West Indies. The main comorbidities were diabetes mellitus (4, 23.5%), surgery in the previous month (4, 23.5%), and recent exposure to antifungals (6, 35.3%). The median length of hospitalization was 15 days. The most represented specimens were isolated from the respiratory tract (12, 70.6%), including 10 (83.3%) performed on intubated patients. C. haemulonii and C. duobushaemulonii were equally frequent, and one patient had mixed colonization. Notably, C. parapsilosis was also identified in 5 (29.4%) of these samples. Among the 12 patients screened for multi-drug resistant bacteria, 5 (41,6%) were positive. The crude mortality at 3 months was 47.1%.

Literature review

The search yielded 274 fungemia from 14 countries (Fig 3), of which 218 were excluded, mainly due to the lack of individual data (S3 Fig). Finally, 56 cases were selected; all occurred between 2006 and 2022. Cases originated mainly from tropical regions (44/56, 78,6%) (S2 Table). We individualized two age groups: children (n = 19) with a median age of 3.5 years (IQR = 0.1–5), and adults (n = 13), with a median age of 66 years (IQR = 52–82). There was no gender predominance in adults. As in our fungemia series, Candida haemulonii sensu stricto was the dominant species. Among adults, the distribution of species varied according to age, with a median age of 79 years for C. haemulonii sensu stricto compared to 56, 49, and 59 years for C. duobushaemulonii, C. haemulonii var. vulnera, and C. pseudohaemulonii, respectively. Age was known for only one case of C. vulturna (83 years).

Fig 3. World mapping of cases of fungemia due to C. haemulonii complex, C. pseudohaemulonii or C. vulturna.

Fig 3

According to our case series (obtained from the YEASTS program 2002–2021 and the RESSIF Network 2012–2021) and the literature review (Medline, 1962–2022). References are with the S3 Fig. Map created from fla-shop.com (https://www.fla-shop.com/svg/, CC BY 4.0 license) modified with inkscape software.

Although previous antifungal exposure was more frequent in the literature than in our series, the susceptibility profile was similar, with high MIC values for amphotericin B and fluconazole (S4 Fig). The median MIC values of amphotericin B were high, notably for C. pseudohaemulonii (32 mg/l) C. vulturna (8 mg/l), and C. duobushaemulonii (4 mg/l). The median MIC values of fluconazole were high, especially for the C. haemulonii complex yeasts (64 mg/l). Micafungin MIC values were 4 mg/l for 3 strains and ≤0.500 mg/l for all the others.

Among all cases, the crude mortality rate was high (5/12, 41,7%) and comparable to our fungemia series, although the time to death was not specified in most articles.

Discussion

We report a large series of fungemia and colonization caused by emerging multiple resistant yeasts of the C. haemulonii complex, or very closely related species (C. pseudohaemulonii and C. vulturna), and a case-control study with C. parapsilosis as reference. We thereby report the first cases of C. vulturna fungemia in South America and Europe since its description in South-East Asia in 2016 [11]. It is also the most important literature review with individual data of fungemia caused by these yeasts and molecularly proven to avoid misidentification.

Considering our series, these rare fungemia are particularly present in tropical regions. Indeed, among centers of the RESSIF and/or the YEASTS programs, only 9 reported C. haemulonii complex-related species fungemia; of these, 3 declarative centers were located in tropical regions, accounting for 20/28 (71.4%) of the whole series. Living in the tropics is by far the factor most associated with the occurrence of fungemia due to these yeasts rather than with C. parapsilosis.

In our series, 92.9% patients presented risk factors comparable to those of C. parapsilosis fungemia, which also corresponds to that observed elsewhere [27]. Contrastingly, pre-exposure to azoles was uncommon in our series (16.6%), although it is usually considered a significant contributor to non-albicans candidemia [28,29]. The high rate of central venous catheters (68.2%) and the absence of digestive surgical site infections suggest skin as the source for C. haemulonii complex-related species candidemia. This is also supported by our results on skin colonization and the ability of such pathogens to form biofilms on prosthetic materials [6,7].

Fungemia caused by C. haemulonii complex yeasts and related species seems to occur in patients at risk of skin-related fungemia, mainly in tropical regions. Case-control study with C. parapsilosis fungemia and the study of carriage, both in the community and in ICU in Martinique allow us to assume that these fungemia are frequent in tropical regions not because of specific host characteristics, but rather because of the burden causing by these yeasts in the environment, which favors carriage both in the outpatients and inpatients.

The broad antifungal resistance of C. haemulonii complex-related species makes them potentially difficult to treat. Although there are no clinical breakpoints or ECOFFs, the particularly high MIC values for amphotericin B, fluconazole, and to a lesser extent other azoles, suggest intrinsic resistance to these antifungals. Correct identification of C. haemulonii complex-related species is relevant not only for epidemiological surveillance but has also a direct therapeutic impact, with amphotericin B having a particularly low in vitro activity against C. duobushaemulonii and C. pseudohaemulonii isolates for instance [30]. Unlike some previously published studies [10,15,16], no death appeared to be attributable to treatment failure in our series, even for the 3 patients treated with fluconazole or itraconazole (whose strains had exceptionally low MIC values for fluconazole (≤16 mg/L).

All-cause mortality was similar between our series (44%) and the literature review (46%). As already shown for catheter-related candidemia, rapid control of the cutaneous portal of entry may play a critical role in preventing death [31,32].

In Martinique, and probably also in Latin America and other Caribbean territories, cutaneous colonization by C. haemulonii exists, especially outside the hospital setting. This is in contrast with its sibling species C. auris, which is often presented as a pure nosocomial yeast [3]. The three patients with positive skin specimens sampled more than one month apart allow us to suspect chronic colonization. In our study, apart from fungemia, no deep-seated infections were observed. Moreover, the fact that all patients with positive ophthalmologic samples wore contact lenses and that 10 of the 12 patients with respiratory colonization in ICU were intubated, suggests colonization of foreign devices [3].

Our study has several limitations. Missing data, especially on the oldest cases, affected our results. We were notably unable to retrieve the time-to-positivity of blood cultures, the confirmation of systematic catheter removal, and the time required for sterilization of blood cultures. Moreover, no skin fungal mapping was reported, precluding confirmation of the skin colonization hypothesis.

Nevertheless, according to our study, the presence of yeasts in a blood culture of a patient hospitalized or coming from a tropical region, especially if presenting a central veinous catheter, should suggest the diagnosis of C. haemulonii complex-related yeasts fungemia, as for Candida parapsilosis. Such a situation requires management of the infection’s portal of entry and reinforces the utility of probabilistic treatment with echinocandins. Despite the lack of specific clinical trials, there are some in vitro and animal data [33] as well as case reports of treatment failures with azoles or amphotericin B [10,15] that justify the use of echinocandins as first-line therapy. When rapid identification by MALDI-TOF MS is not available, the particular aspect of the cultures on chromogenic media might be sufficient to support the diagnosis [34]. This strategy could limit the delay before initiation of appropriate treatment, which is strongly correlated with mortality in candidemia [31,35]. Horizontal transmission capacity, especially in hospitals, has already been suggested by outbreaks involving the C. haemulonii complex [15,36]. The emergence of these yeasts is also supported at the genomic level: the characteristics shared by C. auris and the C. haemulonii complex-related species (synteny, similar gene family expansions) suggest similarities in the ecology and physiology of these species and the potential for them to also emerge as dangerous pathogens [37].

Historically described as warm sea yeasts [38], the C. haemulonii complex-related yeasts were later identified as saprophytes of tropical aquatic and terrestrial environment [3941]—for instance, C. vulturna has been isolated from a tropical flower in the Philippines [11]—and as a potential pathogen for some animal species [9,42]. Some countries have recently reported cases in neonatology, suggesting the presence of these yeasts in artificial environments. Although we have no evidence in our series for an epidemic event, other authors have reported a series of clustered cases [15,30], with the same clone of C. pseudohaemulonii, raising the possibility of nosocomial transmission. A scenario of an emerging epidemic clone within these multi-drug resistant yeast populations is therefore quite credible [30], like the C. auris healthcare-associated outbreaks described since the 2010s.

Conclusion

Fungemia caused by C. haemulonii complex and related species yeasts are rarely observed in France and occur mainly in overseas tropical territories. These environmental yeasts colonize the skin of general population, as well as medical devices, favoring skin-related fungemia in patients with risk factors. These multi-drug resistant yeasts share numerous characteristics with C. auris, and deserve to be known and monitored.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Bar plot representing the temporal distribution of C. haemulonii complex, C. pseudohaemulonii and C. vulturna fungemia (YEASTS and RESSIF databases).

(PDF)

S2 Fig. Flow chart of the samples with positive culture for C. haemulonii complex yeasts considered nonpathogenic, isolated in Martinique University Hospital (French West Indies) between 2014 and 2020.

(PDF)

S3 Fig. Flow chart of the reviewed cases of C. haemulonii complex, C. pseudohaemulonii and C. vulturna fungemia from MedLine (1962–2021).

(PDF)

S4 Fig. Susceptibility profiles of strains from the literature review (MedLine 1962–2022), by microdilution (n = 36) or commercial methods (n = 16), or not specified (n = 1).

(PDF)

S1 Table. Confirmation of identification by MALDI-TOF MS for strains initially identified C. haemulonii complex by API ID32C (BioMerieux, Marcy l’Étoile, France) and stored at the University hospital of Martinique.

(PDF)

S2 Table. Characteristics of patients and strains regarding fungemia found in the literature review with individual data of C. haemulonii complex or related yeasts fungemia identified by molecular sequencing (MedLine 1962–2022).

(PDF)

S1 Acknowledgments

Members of the French Mycoses Study group who contributed to the data are in alphabetical order of the cities.

(PDF)

Data Availability

For data from the RESSIF and YEASTS networks The data used for this publication are considered as pseudonymized personal data. As such the GDPR as well as the French Law pertaining data protection apply to the use of this dataset. For data access request, a requester can contact: Pr Fanny Lanternier, head of NRCMA, cnrma@pasteur.fr The requester shall be informed that access to and reuse of this dataset will require the obtention of (i) an authorization from the French Supervisory Authority regarding data protection (the CNIL) and (ii) an ethics opinion from the competent French ethics committee (the CESREES) For data from the University Hospital of Martinique Access to the data of the University Hospital of Martinique can be requested from the institution's Data Protection Officer (DPO): dpo@chu-martinique.fr.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by Santé Publique France (UF, MDO,YLG, KS, RV, SP, TC, EM, AP, MN,NDG,OL) and Institut Pasteur (UF, MDO,YLG, KS, RV, SP, TC, EM, AP, MN,NDG, OL). The funders had no role in study design, data collection, analysis, or interpretation of data.

References

  • 1.Satoh K, Makimura K, Hasumi Y, Nishiyama Y, Uchida K, Yamaguchi H. Candida auris sp. nov., a novel ascomycetous yeast isolated from the external ear canal of an inpatient in a Japanese hospital. Microbiol Immunol. 2009;53: 41–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chaabane F, Graf A, Jequier L, Coste AT. Review on antifungal resistance mechanisms in the emerging pathogen Candida auris. Front Microbiol. 2019;10: 2788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sabino R, Veríssimo C, Pereira ÁA, Antuness F. Candida auris, an agent of hospital-associated outbreaks: which challenging issues do we need to have in mind? Microorganisms. 2020;8. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8020181 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.van Schalkwyk E, Mpembe RS, Thomas J, Shuping L, Ismail H, Lowman W, et al. Epidemiologic shift in candidemia driven by Candida auris, South Africa, 2016–2017. Emerg Infect Dis. 2019;25: 1698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.WHO fungal priority pathogens list to guide research, development and public health action. World Health Organization; 25 Oct 2022. Available: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240060241 [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ramos LS, Oliveira SSC, Souto XM, Branquinha MH, Santos ALS. Planktonic growth and biofilm formation profiles in Candida haemulonii species complex. Med Mycol. 2017;55: 785–789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ramos LS, Oliveira SSC, Silva LN, Granato MQ, Gonçalves DS, Frases S, et al. Surface, adhesiveness and virulence aspects of Candida haemulonii species complex. Med Mycol. 2020;58: 973–986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Deng Y, Li S, Bing J, Liao W, Tao L. Phenotypic switching and filamentation in Candida haemulonii, an emerging opportunistic pathogen of humans. Microbiol Spectr. 2021;9: e0077921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cendejas-Bueno E, Kolecka A, Alastruey-Izquierdo A, Theelen B, Groenewald M, Kostrzewa M, et al. Reclassification of the Candida haemulonii complex as Candida haemulonii (C. haemulonii group I), C. duobushaemulonii sp. nov. (C. haemulonii group II), and C. haemulonii var. vulnera var. nov.: three multiresistant human pathogenic yeasts. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50: 3641–3651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kim M, Shin JH, Sung H, Lee K, Kim E, Ryoo N, et al. Candida haemulonii and closely related species at 5 university hospitals in korea: identification, antifungal susceptibility, and clinical features. Clin Infect Dis. 2009. pp. e57–e61. doi: 10.1086/597108 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sipiczki M, Tap RM. Candida vulturna pro tempore sp. nov., a dimorphic yeast species related to the Candida haemulonis species complex isolated from flowers and clinical sample. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2016;66. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001302 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ambaraghassi G, Dufresne PJ, Dufresne SF, Vallières É, Muñoz JF, Cuomo CA, et al. Identification of Candida auris by use of the updated Vitek 2 yeast identification system, version 8.01: a multilaboratory evaluation study. J Clin Microbiol. 2019;57. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00884-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lavarde V., Daniel F., Saez H., Arnold M., and Faguer B. Peritonite mycosique à Torulopsis haemulonii. Bull Soc Fr Mycol Med. 1984;13: 173–176. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Marjolet M. Torulopsis ernobii, Torulopsis haemulonii: levures opportunistes chez l’immunodéprimé? Bull Soc Fr Mycol Med. 1986;15: 143–146. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Khan ZU, Al-Sweih NA, Ahmad S, Al-Kazemi N, Khan S, Joseph L, et al. Outbreak of fungemia among neonates caused by Candida haemulonii resistant to amphotericin b, itraconazole, and fluconazole. J Clin Microbiol. 2007. pp. 2025–2027. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00222-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ruan S-Y, Kuo Y-W, Huang C-T, Hsiue H-C, Hsueh P-R. Infections due to Candida haemulonii: species identification, antifungal susceptibility and outcomes. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2010. pp. 85–88. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2009.08.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Córdoba S, Vivot W, Bosco-Borgeat ME, Taverna C, Szusz W, Murisengo O, et al. Species distribution and susceptibility profile of yeasts isolated from blood cultures: results of a multicenter active laboratory-based surveillance study in Argentina. Rev Argent Microbiol. 2011;43. doi: 10.1590/S0325-75412011000300003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Desnos-Ollivier M, Lortholary O, Bretagne S, Dromer F. Azole Susceptibility Profiles of More than 9,000 Clinical Yeast Isolates Belonging to 40 Common and Rare Species. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2021. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02615-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Muro MD, de Araújo Motta F, Burger M, de Azevedo Melo AS, Dalla-Costa LM. Echinocandin resistance in two Candida haemulonii isolates from pediatric patients. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50: 3783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bretagne S, Sitbon K, Desnos-Ollivier M, Garcia-Hermoso D, Letscher-Bru V, Cassaing S, et al. Active surveillance program to increase awareness on invasive fungal diseases: the French RESSIF Network (2012 to 2018). MBio. 2022;13: e0092022. doi: 10.1128/mbio.00920-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bretagne S, Renaudat C, Desnos-Ollivier M, Sitbon K, Lortholary O, Dromer F, et al. Predisposing factors and outcome of uncommon yeast species-related fungaemia based on an exhaustive surveillance programme (2002–14). Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2017. pp. 1784–1793. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bretagne S, Desnos-Ollivier M, Sitbon K, Lortholary O, Che D, Dromer F, et al. No impact of fluconazole to echinocandins replacement as first-line therapy on the epidemiology of yeast fungemia (hospital-driven active surveillance, 2004–2017, Paris, France). Front Med. 2021;8: 641965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Desnos-Ollivier M, Bretagne S, Boullié A, Gautier C, Dromer F, Lortholary O. Isavuconazole MIC distribution of 29 yeast species responsible for invasive infections (2015–2017). Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019. pp. 634.e1–634.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.02.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Desnos-Ollivier M, Bretagne S, Lortholary O, Dromer F, French Mycoses Study Group. Echinocandins susceptibility patterns of 2,787 yeast isolates: importance of the thresholds for the detection of FKS mutations. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022;66: e0172521. doi: 10.1128/aac.01725-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Grenfell RC, da Silva Junior AR, Del Negro GMB, Munhoz RB, Gimenes VMF, Assis DM, et al. Identification of Candida haemulonii complex species: use of ClinProTools to overcome limitations of the Bruker Biotyper, Vitek MS IVD, and Vitek MS RUO databases. Front Microbiol. 2016. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00940 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Isla G, Taverna CG, Szusz W, Vivot W, García-Effron G, Davel G. Candida haemulonii sensu lato: Update of the determination of susceptibility profile in Argentina and literature review. Curr Fungal Infect Rep. 2017. pp. 203–208. doi: 10.1007/s12281-017-0300-y [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lortholary O, Renaudat C, Sitbon K, Desnos-Ollivier M, Bretagne S, Dromer F, et al. The risk and clinical outcome of candidemia depending on underlying malignancy. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43: 652–662. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4743-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Chow JK, Golan Y, Ruthazer R, Karchmer AW, Carmeli Y, Lichtenberg D, et al. Factors associated with candidemia caused by non-albicans Candida species versus Candida albicans in the intensive care unit. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46: 1206–1213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Jung DS, Farmakiotis D, Jiang Y, Tarrand JJ, Kontoyiannis DP. Uncommon Candida species fungemia among cancer patients, Houston, Texas, USA. Emerging Infect Dis. 2015. doi: 10.3201/eid2111.150404 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gade L, Muñoz JF, Sheth M, Wagner D, Berkow EL, Forsberg K, et al. Understanding the emergence of multidrug-resistant candida: using whole-genome sequencing to describe the population structure of Candida haemulonii species complex. Front Genet. 2020;0. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00554 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Andes DR, Safdar N, Baddley JW, Playford G, Reboli AC, Rex JH, et al. Impact of treatment strategy on outcomes in patients with candidemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis: a patient-level quantitative review of randomized trials. Clin Infect Dis. 2012. pp. 1110–1122. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kollef M, Micek S, Hampton N, Doherty JA, Kumar A. Septic shock attributed to Candida infection: importance of empiric therapy and source control. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54: 1739–1746. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis305 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Silva LN, Campos-Silva R, Ramos LS, Trentin DS, Macedo AJ, Branquinha MH, et al. Virulence of Candida haemulonii complex in Galleria mellonella and efficacy of classical antifungal drugs: a comparative study with other clinically relevant non-albicans Candida species. FEMS Yeast Res. 2018;18. doi: 10.1093/femsyr/foy082 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.de Jong AW, Dieleman C, Carbia M, Mohd Tap R, Hagen F. Performance of two novel chromogenic media for the identification of multidrug-resistant Candida auris compared with other commercially available formulations. J Clin Microbiol. 2021;59. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03220-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Garey KW, Rege M, Pai MP, Mingo DE, Suda KJ, Turpin RS, et al. Time to initiation of fluconazole therapy impacts mortality in patients with candidemia: a multi-institutional study. Clin Infect Dis. 2006. pp. 25–31. doi: 10.1086/504810 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ramos R, Caceres DH, Perez M, Garcia N, Castillo W, Santiago E, et al. Emerging multidrug-resistant Candida duobushaemulonii infections in Panama hospitals: importance of laboratory surveillance and accurate identification. J Clin Microbiol. 2018;56. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00371-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Muñoz JF, Gade L, Chow NA, Loparev VN, Juieng P, Berkow EL, et al. Genomic insights into multidrug-resistance, mating and virulence in Candida auris and related emerging species. Nat Commun. 2018;9. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07779-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.None van U, Mc K. Torulopsis haemulonii nov. spec., a yeast from the Atlantic Ocean. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1962;28. doi: 10.1007/BF02538724 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ferreira N, Belloch C, Querol A, Manzanares P, Vallez S, Santos A. Yeast microflora isolated from brazilian cassava roots: taxonomical classification based on molecular identification. Curr Microbiol. 2010;60. doi: 10.1007/s00284-009-9539-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Pagani DM, Heidrich D, Paulino GVB, de Oliveira Alves K, Dalbem PT, de Oliveira CF, et al. Susceptibility to antifungal agents and enzymatic activity of Candida haemulonii and Cutaneotrichosporon dermatis isolated from soft corals on the Brazilian reefs. Arch Microbiol. 2016;198: 963–971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Tra Bi CY, N’guessan FK, Kouakou CA, Jacques N, Casaregola S, Djè MK. Identification of yeasts isolated from raffia wine (Raphia hookeri) produced in Côte d’Ivoire and genotyping of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains by PCR inter-delta. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;32: 1–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Loosová G, Jindrák L, Kopácek P. Mortality caused by experimental infection with the yeast Candida haemulonii in the adults of Ornithodoros moubata (Acarina: Argasidae). Folia Parasitol. 2013;48: 149–153. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011453.r001

Decision Letter 0

Joshua Nosanchuk

8 Apr 2023

Dear Dr Lortholary,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Candida haemulonii complex, an emerging threat from tropical regions?" for consideration at PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. The reviewers appreciated the attention to an important topic. Based on the reviews, we are likely to accept this manuscript for publication, providing that you modify the manuscript according to the review recommendations.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 30 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email.

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to all review comments, and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Thank you again for your submission to our journal. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Joshua Nosanchuk, MD

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Joshua Nosanchuk

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Key Review Criteria Required for Acceptance?

As you describe the new analyses required for acceptance, please consider the following:

Methods

-Are the objectives of the study clearly articulated with a clear testable hypothesis stated?

-Is the study design appropriate to address the stated objectives?

-Is the population clearly described and appropriate for the hypothesis being tested?

-Is the sample size sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested?

-Were correct statistical analysis used to support conclusions?

-Are there concerns about ethical or regulatory requirements being met?

Reviewer #1: Objectives of the study are clearly stated. Study design is appropriate for the stated objectives. Population described clearly and appropriate for objectives of study. Sample size is small but this is a rare disease so I think the author have done well in combining data from multiple years as well as performing a literature review. This has added weight to the findings and helped overcome the challenge of small numbers. No ethical concern.

Reviewer #2: The objective of the work is clear, with this research it was expected to know a little more about the C. haemulonii complex and the species that are included in it. It is a work of many years and that implied a complete experimental design, which is reflected here. All methodologies were adequate to meet the objective of the work. It should be noted that to contrast the results, epidemiological data from the region were used, which were obtained in different hospitals and foundations, in addition, these data were compared with what has already been reported in the literature. There were many samples of patients analyzed, therefore, the population n is sufficient for the statistical analyzes to be more complete. With respect to bioethical permits, initially they mention the institutions by which the work was approved, however, nothing is mentioned about the informed consent of the patients, or if this was not required.

Reviewer #3: -Are the objectives of the study clearly articulated with a clear testable hypothesis stated? Yes.

-Is the study design appropriate to address the stated objectives? Yes.

-Is the population clearly described and appropriate for the hypothesis being tested? Yes.

-Is the sample size sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested? Yes, though samples sized were relative small.

-Were correct statistical analysis used to support conclusions? Yes.

-Are there concerns about ethical or regulatory requirements being met? No.

--------------------

Results

-Does the analysis presented match the analysis plan?

-Are the results clearly and completely presented?

-Are the figures (Tables, Images) of sufficient quality for clarity?

Reviewer #1: Analysis matches the presented plan. Results are very clear and no issues with the tables.

- Please highlight the major differences in the two groups from Table 1.

- Line 198 - Is the present of that yeast in the eye only a colonizer? Could it have a role to play in the patient's keratitis/corneal abscess?

Reviewer #2: The data analysis is understandable, the tables are a good complement to understand what was found. As has been previously reported in other studies, the incidence of candidiasis increases especially in immunocompetent and immunosuppressed patients, an example of this is what was found in this study. Cancer and diabetes mellitus are diseases that are associated with an increase in candidiasis caused by these species of the complex. All the findings are well explained and are supported by tables and figures. I suggest that the figures and tables found in supplementary material be revised and modified, since they are of poor quality and much information is lost.

Reviewer #3: -Does the analysis presented match the analysis plan? Yes.

-Are the results clearly and completely presented? Yes.

-Are the figures (Tables, Images) of sufficient quality for clarity? Yes.

--------------------

Conclusions

-Are the conclusions supported by the data presented?

-Are the limitations of analysis clearly described?

-Do the authors discuss how these data can be helpful to advance our understanding of the topic under study?

-Is public health relevance addressed?

Reviewer #1: The conclusions are supported by the presented data. Limitations of the study are clearly described. This is helpful from a public health standpoint and a significant contribution to the understanding of this rare group of yeast that used to be misidentified as C. auris by some identification systems.

Reviewer #2: With respect to the conclusions section, I consider that these should be mentioned in the final part of the text. In the discussion section some limitations of the work are mentioned and how they could be solved, however, in the literature there is a lot of information that could help to complement this section. In the attached file there are some comments on this specific section. At the end of the paper it is necessary to mention the future perspectives of this work, why it is important to study these species, especially in the hospital environment, and the implications it has on public health.

Reviewer #3: -Are the conclusions supported by the data presented? Yes.

-Are the limitations of analysis clearly described? Yes.

-Do the authors discuss how these data can be helpful to advance our understanding of the topic under study? Yes.

-Is public health relevance addressed? Yes.

--------------------

Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications?

Use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity. If the only modifications needed are minor and/or editorial, you may wish to recommend “Minor Revision” or “Accept”.

Reviewer #1: Minor revisions as suggested in the textboxes above and below.

Reviewer #2: Throughout the following text I mention some points that should be taken into account for this revision. The changes are minor. Special attention should be paid to the spelling of the reference section.

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

--------------------

Summary and General Comments

Use this section to provide overall comments, discuss strengths/weaknesses of the study, novelty, significance, general execution and scholarship. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. If requesting major revision, please articulate the new experiments that are needed.

Reviewer #1: - First page - Abstract/Results: a psace is missing "fungemiadue" and "werefrequently"

- Long form of ICU needs to be provided before it can be used as an acronym (line 107)

- I would mention that this specie could be a C. auris misidentification on identification by Vitek 2 version 8.01

- I suggest adding the following reference to line 255-256 : Microorganisms. 2020 Feb; 8(2): 181.

Published online 2020 Jan 28. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8020181 PMCID: PMC7074697 PMID: 32012865

- I suggest reviewing "effraction" on line 267 as I am familiar with it as a francophone but this term is not commonly used in the English language to mean what its intended meaning in French

Reviewer #2: General comments are available in the following text. I consider it to be an interesting and novel text, as there are few works that deal with all species of the C. haemulonii complex. In addition, it is the first report of these species in France, and to achieve this it was necessary to review biological samples from 2002 to 2021, which indicates that it is a very complete report. Contributing to the knowledge of these species has important implications for science, thanks to these studies it is possible to search for new alternative treatments for the control of these species. In addition, this information provides interesting data about the biology of the species of this complex, from their lifestyle in the environment to how they infect their host. It would be interesting to emphasize the identification of these species, since it is known that distinguishing between species is still a complicated task and in some cases unsuccessful.

Reviewer #3: General comments

1. I review this manuscript entitled “Candida haemulonii complex, an emerging threat from tropical regions?” with interest. This manuscript described clinical and demographic characteristics of patients with fungemia due to C. haemulonii complex and related species (C. pseudohaemulonii, C. vulturna).

2. This is a neglected tropical disease warrants more attention because C. haemulonii complex (C. haemulonii sensu stricto, C. duobushaemulonii, C. haemulonii var. vulnera) and related species (C. pseudohaemulonii and C. vulturna), are phylogenetically close to Candida auris with intrinsic antifungal resistance. I fully agree what authors emphasized “Multidrug-resistant C. haemulonii complex-related species are responsible for fungemia and colonization in community and hospital settings, especially in tropical regions, warranting closer epidemiological surveillance to prevent a potential C. auris-like threat.” (Abstract, Conclusions/Significance). However, its importance is underestimated due to difficulty in accurate identification and thus, underreported.

3. Due to limited case numbers and published data, this manuscript included three part of results. A nationwide case series reported in France during 2002-2021 (28 cases, the first epidemiological data on these yeasts in France), a single center study regarding colonization and infection due to C. haemulonii complex (40 cases), and a literature review of fungemia due to C. haemulonii complex and related species reported in Medline (1962-2022) (274 cases). The final part included all reported cases of C. haemulonii complex, C. pseudohaemulonii, and C. vulturna fungemia identified by sequencing, for which individual clinical information and/or susceptibility to antifungals were available.

Specific comments

Lines 158-160, please shorten as these data were presented in the Table 1.

Lines 161-163, “Four distinct species were identified….”, thus, suggest delete the same content in Table 1.

Table 1. Among patients with available birth continent 18 of 20 (90.0%) patients with C. haemulonii complex-related species were America. Is it due to the majority of cases were reported from oversea France?

--------------------

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Samuel Bourassa-Blanchette

Reviewer #2: Yes: Manuela Gómez Gaviria

Reviewer #3: No

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

References

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article's retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Attachment

Submitted filename: PNTD-D-23-00339.pdf

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011453.r003

Decision Letter 1

Joshua Nosanchuk

9 Jun 2023

Dear Dr Lortholary,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Candida haemulonii complex, an emerging threat from tropical regions?' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. Thank you for providing a thoughtful and comprehensive response to the reviewer comments! 

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Joshua Nosanchuk, MD

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************************************************

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011453.r004

Acceptance letter

Joshua Nosanchuk

25 Jul 2023

Dear Dr Lortholary,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, " Candida haemulonii complex, an emerging threat from tropical regions?," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Editorial, Viewpoint, Symposium, Review, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript will be published online unless you opted out of this process. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Shaden Kamhawi

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Paul Brindley

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Bar plot representing the temporal distribution of C. haemulonii complex, C. pseudohaemulonii and C. vulturna fungemia (YEASTS and RESSIF databases).

    (PDF)

    S2 Fig. Flow chart of the samples with positive culture for C. haemulonii complex yeasts considered nonpathogenic, isolated in Martinique University Hospital (French West Indies) between 2014 and 2020.

    (PDF)

    S3 Fig. Flow chart of the reviewed cases of C. haemulonii complex, C. pseudohaemulonii and C. vulturna fungemia from MedLine (1962–2021).

    (PDF)

    S4 Fig. Susceptibility profiles of strains from the literature review (MedLine 1962–2022), by microdilution (n = 36) or commercial methods (n = 16), or not specified (n = 1).

    (PDF)

    S1 Table. Confirmation of identification by MALDI-TOF MS for strains initially identified C. haemulonii complex by API ID32C (BioMerieux, Marcy l’Étoile, France) and stored at the University hospital of Martinique.

    (PDF)

    S2 Table. Characteristics of patients and strains regarding fungemia found in the literature review with individual data of C. haemulonii complex or related yeasts fungemia identified by molecular sequencing (MedLine 1962–2022).

    (PDF)

    S1 Acknowledgments

    Members of the French Mycoses Study group who contributed to the data are in alphabetical order of the cities.

    (PDF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PNTD-D-23-00339.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Answers to reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    For data from the RESSIF and YEASTS networks The data used for this publication are considered as pseudonymized personal data. As such the GDPR as well as the French Law pertaining data protection apply to the use of this dataset. For data access request, a requester can contact: Pr Fanny Lanternier, head of NRCMA, cnrma@pasteur.fr The requester shall be informed that access to and reuse of this dataset will require the obtention of (i) an authorization from the French Supervisory Authority regarding data protection (the CNIL) and (ii) an ethics opinion from the competent French ethics committee (the CESREES) For data from the University Hospital of Martinique Access to the data of the University Hospital of Martinique can be requested from the institution's Data Protection Officer (DPO): dpo@chu-martinique.fr.


    Articles from PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES