Abstract
The aim of this study is to identifying post treatment recurrence rates in pneumothorax patients under 35 and without any comorbidities according to the treatment types, gender, and age categories based on nationwide population data. Clinical information of pneumothorax patients was extracted from the Korean National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) database between January 2002 and December 2020. Enrolled patients were categorized into two groups; (1) Group I, those who underwent conservative management including pain relief, oxygen therapy, and closed thoracostomy, and (2) Group II, surgical intervention. Recurrence rates were compared according to age, gender, and type of treatment. Surgical intervention was performed in 25.6% patients as first treatment. The overall recurrence rate was 20.3%. Male patients showed a higher 5-year recurrence rate than female (20.8% vs. 10.9%, p < 0.001). Those with conservative management showed lower 5-year recurrence rates than those with surgical treatment (7.9% vs. 23.7%, p < 0.001). The 5-year recurrence rates of patients aged 14≤, and < 20 was higher than other age groups (29.2% vs. 4.5 and 11.9%, p < 0.001). Surgical intervention, male gender and aged under 20 showed association with higher recurrence rates.
Subject terms: Diseases, Health care
Introduction
Spontaneous pneumothorax is defined as air collection in pleural space without any traumatic forces. Bimodal curve was noted in age distributions, one was between 15 to 34, and the other was aged over 55–651–3. The term ‘primary’ can be added when no underlying pulmonary pathologies are found, which is common in the first peak population with reported annual incidence of 7.4 men and 1.2 women per 100,000 individuals4.
Although there are well established treatment guidelines5–8, no consideration relating with age differences have been reflect. Current treatment process for young SP patients otherwise healthy tended to be largely relied on clinician’s customization9,10. Methodologies for estimating severity of pneumothorax such as calculating the amount of collected air in the thorax or the size of bullae on the pleural surface were mostly derived from imaging studies of adults11. Therapeutic algorithms suggest non-surgical management including observation, oxygen inhalation, needle aspiration, and drainage using a small- or large-bore catheter for first episodes5,6,8, however, surgical intervention would be justified considering high recurrence rates reported up to 50%4,5.
Because the main purposes of PSP treatment are re-expansion of the collapsed lung and recurrence prevention8, initial surgical intervention for correcting the pathologic status directly may be attractive. This would remove the potential risk factors of air leakage or recurrence, such as bullae or blebs, thereby significant reduction in recurrence rates and hospital stays12.
Nevertheless, surgical outcomes in young PSP patients seemed to be controversial. Several researches proposed that the prevalence of recurrence tends to increase in younger patients despite surgical treatment13–15. Age under 18 was often referred as one of risk factors for recurrence after surgery. Other studies recommended Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) to be first-line therapies for children10, occasionally confined to cases that predisposing factors exist9.
The ambiguity in PSP treatment could be due to the poor understanding of precise pathogenesis. The visible emphysema-like changes (ELCs), called bullae or blebs, have been considered to be causes of intrapleural air collection through a rupture site16; but this hypothesis has have never been proven8. Moreover, the ELCs are not always detectable17. A unique pleural fibrosis pattern with fibroblastic foci at the margin of pleura and parenchyma in young pneumothorax patients was noted18. There is a possibility of diffuse air passage through invisible pores lining a weak area of visceral pleura19.
The incomplete growth process can be one reason for the increase in recurrence rate. The rapid longitudinal growth during puberty was reported to induce inflating pressure and, therefore, to reduce compliance20. Delayed puberty was frequently observed in young PSP patients to which the risk of recurrence after the surgical intervention can be attributed21. Because puberty is associated with early acceleration and late deceleration of growth velocity22, surgery can induce the vulnerable environment for recurrence by modifying the premature lung parenchyma. recent studies have suggested the possibility of changing paradigms to minimize treatment invasiveness23,24
Based on nationwide population data, we aimed to estimate the recurrence rate after surgery in young PSP patients according to age distribution; children, adolescence, or young adult, and gender Comparison with recurrence tendency of patients who did not undergo surgery was also performed. The aim of this study is to understand trends of recurrence pattern in young PSP patients who were in difference developing periods according to the gender and treatment types.
Materials and methods
Data sources
For a nationwide population-based study, we extracted data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) cooperation system between January 2002 and December 2020 (customized data number: NHIS-2021-1-808). The customized data of this study was extracted and provided according to the workflow of the National Health Insurance System Sharing Service (https://nhiss.nhis.or.kr/bd/ab/bdaba032eng.do). Health insurance claim data from this system is stored and managed by classifying a single claim statement into several tables such as general statement details, disease details, treatment details, and medical institution prescription details, and it includes the statement identification number information as a common variable, enabling linkage between tables. The general statement detail table includes basic information of the patient (gender, age, insurance type), disease (codes of major diagnosis/first auxiliary diagnosis codes), treatment information, and information on medical expenses.
Korean NHIS covers over 98% of domestic people for medical services. It is a single payer system, from which, medical providers can be reimbursed for their services. Patient who had been treated in any kinds of hospitals were enrolled in this system with the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health problems, 10th revision (ICD-10). The therapeutic records were detected using specific treatment relating diagnosed diseases.
Study population and categorization
Patient registry who were given ICD-10 codes relating with spontaneous pneumothorax Korean NHIS between January 2002 and December 2020. Associating ICD codes were J93 (pneumothorax), J93.0 (spontaneous tension pneumothorax), J93.1 (other spontaneous pneumothorax), J93.8 (other pneumothorax) and J93.9 (pneumothorax unspecified). Pneumothorax relating with trauma (S27.x) was not involved.
The incidence trends of spontaneous pneumothorax typically showed bimodal age-distribution, first peak at age between 15 to 34 and the other age beyond 60 s1–3. Primary spontaneous pneumothorax generally affects young healthy population, therefore we enrolled first peak of age-distribution in this study. Patients who were (1) aged ≥ 35 when pneumothorax was first diagnosed, or assigned with other codes associated with pulmonary diseases before the first diagnosis of pneumothorax or simultaneously, such as (2) with congenital pulmonary disease, (3) diagnosed as having pneumonia, (4) tuberculosis, and (5) with cancers were not included for excluding any secondary causes. Relating ICD codes (relevant diseases among A, B, C, J M, O P codes) were used (Supplementary Table S1).
Enrolled patients were categorized into two groups according to therapeutic types for their first pneumothorax. Group I patients underwent conservative management, including observation, pain relief, oxygen therapy, and closed thoracostomy. Group II patients underwent surgical intervention. The recurrence rates of the two groups according to age distributions and gender were evaluated and compared. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Korea University Anam Hospital (IRB number: 2021AN0334) and was performed in a manner consistent with the institution’s ethical policies and standards.
Definition of recurrence
Healthcare Insurance Claim Data contains unique identifiers, enabling patient differentiation and facilitating the creation of patient follow-up information. Recurrence of pneumothorax was defined when the diagnostic codes (J93, J93.1, J93.8 and J93.9) were assigned after the first treatment until the data extraction time (2022.05) due to: (1) readmission with pneumothorax diagnostic codes or (2) more than three outpatient visits for pneumothorax within two months in any time of follow-up periods.
Treatment types for first pneumothorax
We identified therapeutic options, including simple observation, pain relief, oxygen inhalation, closed thoracostomy, and surgical intervention. Surgical intervention included video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, usually wedge resection for bullae. Treatment modalities other than surgery were classified as conservative management. Since Health insurance claim data assign specific codes to each treatment action and prescription for payment, data were extracted using those. For identifying treatment, codes for oxygen therapy (C1000021), closed thoracostomy (T006405), Pleurodesis (T001080, T001081 and T006394), and surgery (T006217 and T006219). Patients who were assigned by codes for surgery were classified as Group II, and others as Group I.
Classification according to age categories
Patients were divided into three age categories: (1) age under 14 years, (2) age ≥ 14 years and < 20 years, and (3) ≥ 20 years. Age 14 is considered to be the age of the last growth spurt in Korean children25, and age 20 is the border between adolescence and adulthood in the WHO classification26. Patient distribution according to age categories is described in Table 2.
Table 2.
Variables | Group I (conservative) | Group II (surgery) | Total | p-value | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(N = 127,194) | (N = 43,652) | (N = 170,846) | ||||||||
Age categories | < 14 | ≥ 14, < 20 | ≥ 20 | < 14 | ≥ 14, < 20 | ≥ 20 | < 14 | ≥ 14, < 20 | ≥ 20 | |
(N = 8,893) | (N = 57,386) | (N = 60,915) | (N = 638) | (N = 25,753) | (N = 17,261) | (N = 9,531) | (N = 83,139) | (N = 78,176) | ||
N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | ||
Year of diagnosis | < 0.001 | |||||||||
2002–2005 | 1,744 (19.6) | 11,986 (20.9) | 19,209 (31.5) | 90 (14.1) | 3,904 (15.2) | 4,055 (23.5) | 1,834 (19.2) | 15,890 (19.1) | 23,264 (29.8) | |
2006–2010 | 2,488 (28.0) | 17,605 (30.7) | 18,116 (29.7) | 231 (36.2) | 7,925 (30.8) | 5,313 (30.8) | 2,719 (28.5) | 25,530 (30.7) | 23,429 (30.0) | |
2010–2015 | 2,551 (28.7) | 17,199 (30.0) | 13,607 (22.3) | 186 (29.2) | 8,332 (32.4) | 4,479 (25.9) | 2,737 (28.7) | 25,531 (30.7) | 18,086 (23.1) | |
2016–2020 | 2,110 (23.7) | 10,596 (18.5) | 9,983 (16.4) | 131 (20.5) | 5,592 (21.7) | 3,414 (19.8) | 2,241 (23.5) | 1,6188 (19.5) | 13,397 (17.1) | |
Gender | < 0.001 | |||||||||
Male | 6,241 (70.2) | 52,017 (90.6) | 48,513 (79.6) | 503 (78.8) | 23,874 (92.7) | 15,332 (88.8) | 6,744 (70.8) | 75,891 (91.3) | 63,845 (81.7) | |
Female | 2,652 (29.8) | 5,369 (9.4) | 12,402 (20.4) | 135 (21.2) | 1,879 (7.3) | 1,929 (11.2) | 2,787 (29.2) | 7,248 (8.7) | 14,331 (18.3) | |
< 0.001 | ||||||||||
Mean age | 10.7 ± 4.1 | 17.6 ± 1.4 | 26.8 ± 3.9 | 13.3 ± 2.0 | 17.7 ± 1.4 | 26.2 ± 3.7 | 11.0 ± 4.0 | 17.7 ± 1.4 | 26.6 ± 3.9 | |
< 0.001 | ||||||||||
Recurrence | 728 (8.2) | 16,025 (27.9) | 7,138 (11.7) | 352 (55.2) | 8,287 (32.2) | 2,213 (12.8) | 1,038 (10.9) | 2,4312 (29.2) | 9351 (12.0) |
Statistical analysis
The cumulative incidences of recurrence were calculated using the competing risk method regarding any death event as a competing risk. Gray's test estimated the differences in cumulative incidences between groups. The comparison among groups was performed using the chi-squared test for categorical variables and the student t-test for continuous variables. All statistical analyses were performed using R 3.0.2 software (www.r-project.org).
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Korea University Anam Hospital (IRB number: 2021AN0334). The necessity for acquiring written informed consent from the patients included in this study was waived because this was retrospective study and any individual information was not identifiable in the text. The study used de-identified secondary health insurance claim data collected and distributed by NHIS under the government Ministry of Health and Welfare. As the data is available upon request to NHIS (www.nhis.or.kr), the study received a waiver of Ethical approval from Yonsei University Health System, Severance Hospital, Institutional Review Board (Wavier approval number: 4–2021-1375). Moreover, the informed consent was waived as the data is provided by NHIS. The waiver was approved based as Enforcement Rules Of The Bioethics and Safety Act, Republic of Korea [Article 15 (Deliberation on Human Subjects Research Projects) (1) A person who intends to conduct a human subjects research project shall prepare a research plan and submit it for deliberation by the competent IRB before commencing such human subjects research project. (2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), a research project may be exempted from deliberation by the competent IRB, if a risk to human subjects of research and the general public is insignificant and the research project meets the standards prescribed by Ordinance of the Ministry of Health and Welfare after deliberation by the National Committee].
Results
Patient demographics
Among a total of 402,249 cases of spontaneous pneumothorax, 191,659 patients under 35 years of age were identified. Patients with congenital pulmonary disease (N = 5582), diagnosed as having pneumonia or tuberculosis before the attack of pneumothorax (N = 13,041), and with cancers (N = 2190) were excluded (Fig. 1). Patient demographics were described in Table 1.
Table 1.
Variables | Group I (conservative) | Group II (surgery) | Total | p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
(N = 127,194) | (N = 43,652) | (N = 170,846) | ||
N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | ||
Year of diagnosis | < 0.001 | |||
2002–2005 | 32,939 (26.0) | 8,049 (18.4) | 40,988 (24.0) | |
2006–2010 | 38,209 (30.0) | 13,469 (30.9) | 51,678 (30.2) | |
2011–2015 | 33,357 (26.2) | 12,997 (29.8) | 46,354 (27.1) | |
2016–2020 | 22,689 (17.8) | 9,137 (20.9) | 31,826 (18.6) | |
Gender | < 0.001 | |||
Men | 106,771 (83.9) | 39,709 (91.0) | 146,480 (85.7) | |
Women | 20,423 (16.1) | 3,943 (9.0) | 24,366 (14.3) | |
Age | < 0.001 | |||
21.3 ± 6.8 | 21.0 ± 5.0 | 21.2 ± 6.4 | ||
Group | < 0.001 | |||
< 14 | 8,893 (4.6) | 638 (1.5) | 9,531 (3.8) | |
≤ 14, < 20 | 57,386 (46.3) | 25,753 (59.0) | 83,139 (49.6) | |
≤ 20 | 60,915 (49.1) | 17,261 (39.5) | 78,176 (46.6) | |
Recurrence | < 0.001 | |||
23,891 (18.8) | 10,852 (24.9) | 34,743 (20.3) |
A total of 170,846 patients were enrolled in this study. Men comprised 146,480 (85.7%) and women, 24,366 (14.3%). There were significantly more men in Group II than Group I (P < 0.001). A flowchart for patient categorization is shown in Fig. 1. Age distribution for first pneumothorax diagnosis and its recurrence rates are illustrated in Fig. 2. Timing of recurrence after 1st episodes by year were described in Fig. 3, and high-low-closed charts according to the treatment groups and gender, in Fig. 4.
Overall and 5-year recurrence rates
The overall recurrence rates were 20.3%, and the 5-year rates, 19.3%. The 5-year recurrence rates of male patients were higher than those of females (20.8% vs. 10.9%, p < 0.001), and the 5-year recurrence rates of Group I patients were significantly lower than those of Group II patients (17.9% vs. 23.7%, p < 0.001). According to the age categories, patients aged ≤ 14 years, and > 20 years showed significantly higher recurrence rates compared with the other age groups (29.2% vs. 4.5% and 11.9%, p < 0.001) (Fig. 5).
Comparison of Group I and II
The cumulative recurrence rates were compared between Group I and Group II (Fig. 6) according to the age categories and gender respectively. Group II showed higher 5-year recurrence rates in all age categories except adult male (Fig. 6F. 12.5 vs 12.8%, P = 0.610).
Comparison among age categories
Table 2 shows the overall recurrence rates by age categories. The 5-year recurrence rates of ages ≥ 14 and < 20 were significantly higher than the other age categories (< 14, and ≥ 20) in all patients, regardless of gender and Group I classification (Supplementary Fig. S2A,B,D,E,G,H). In Group II, age under 14 categories showed over 50% recurrence rates, showed higher recurrence rates than other age categories and gender (Supplementary Fig. S2C,F,I, P < 0.001). Adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of recurrence according to the age categories relating with gender and treatment groups were described in Table 3.
Table 3.
Variables | Age categories | Total | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
< 14 | ≥ 14, < 20 | ≥ 20 | |||||||||
HR (95% CI) | p-value | HR (95% CI) | p-value | HR (95% CI) | p-value | HR (95% CI) | p-value | ||||
Age | |||||||||||
< 14 | 1.5 (1.41–1-60) | < 0.001 | |||||||||
≥ 14, < 20 | 2.61(2.55–2.68) | < 0.001 | |||||||||
≥ 20 | Ref | ||||||||||
Gender | |||||||||||
Male | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | |||||||
Female | 0.44 (0.37–0.53) | < 0.001 | 0.58 (0.525–0.61) | < 0.001 | 0.73 (0.68–0.77) | < 0.001 | 0.63 (0.61–0.66) | < 0.001 | |||
Treatment | |||||||||||
Group I (conservative) | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | |||||||
Group II (surgery) | 6.03 (5.29–6.86) | < 0.001 | 1.16 (1.13–1.19) | < 0.001 | 1.07 (1.02–1.12) | < 0.001 | 1.18 (1.15–1.21) | < 0.001 |
HR Hazard ratio, CI confidential interval.
Comparison between genders
Comparison of cumulative recurrence rates between male and female was performed according to the age categories and treatment groups (Supplementary Fig. S3). The recurrence rates of male were higher than those from female in all age categories and treatment groups except in Group I of ages under 14 (Supplementary Fig. S3D, P = 0.097), and Group II ages ≥ 20 (Supplementary Fig. S3I, P = 0.058). Adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of recurrence according to treatment group and gender were described in Table 4.
Table 4.
Variables | Treatment | Gender | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group I (conservative) | Group II (surgery) | Male | Female | ||||||
HR (95% CI) | p-value | HR (95% CI) | p-value | HR (95% CI) | p-value | HR (95% CI) | p-value | ||
Age | |||||||||
< 14 | 1.07 (0.99–1.16) | 0.073 | 5.74 (5.12–6.42) | < 0.001 | 1.63 (1.52–1.74) | < 0.001 | 0.97 (0.81–1.15) | < 0.001 | |
≥ 14, < 20 | 2.53 (2.46–2.61) | < 0.001 | 2.85 (2.72–2.99) | < 0.001 | 2.68 (2.62–2.75) | < 0.001 | 2.02 (1.87–2.18) | < 0.001 | |
≥ 20 | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | |||||
Gender | |||||||||
Male | Ref | Ref | |||||||
Female | 0.59 (0.56–0.62) | < 0.001 | 0.74 (0.69–0.80) | < 0.001 | |||||
Treatment | |||||||||
Group I (conservative) | Ref | Ref | |||||||
Group II (surgery) | 1.16 (1.13–1.18) | < 0.001 | 1.57 | (1.44–1.71) | < 0.001 |
HR Hazard ratio, CI confidential interval.
Discussion
The incidence trends of spontaneous pneumothorax showed bimodal age-distribution, first peak at age between 15 to 34, and the other age beyond 60 s. Primary spontaneous pneumothorax usually involves young healthy population without pre-existing pulmonary diseases1–3. Spontaneous pneumothorax in elderly population is frequently associated with underlying chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), interstitial lung diseases or other pulmonary abnormalities therefore treatment process including prognosis could be differed; Preference of conservative treatment rather than surgery, and longer hospital stay as well as chest tube indwelling periods27. The goal of treatment in young spontaneous pneumothorax is to evacuate of air and if necessary, to prevent recurrence8. Surgery could be considered as first line treatment12,28.
A substantial proportion of PSP patients suffer from recurrence. In the relevant literature, there are reports of up to 50% recurrence after first events, mainly appearing within two to 24 months4,20. Surgical interventions are often recommended for prevention12, especially in cases in which bullae or blebs have been demonstrated on chest CT29. As a potential prevention, surgery may differ from the other therapeutic modalities that include observation, oxygen therapy, air aspiration, and catheter or chest tube insertion. These other modalities we describe as conservative management.
However, the protective effect of surgery has remained a controversial issue8,20,30. Previous studies have reported that surgery could be a risk factor for recurrence, not improving prognosis14,30,31. The recurrence rates in the young population who underwent surgery tended to increase14. In our study, with a few exceptions, PSP patients with surgical intervention experienced increased risk over those who had not been treated surgically. Only male patients aged ≥ 20 years showed no statistical significance between conservative and surgical management.
Notably, patients under 14 had a large discrepancy in recurrence rates between conventional and surgical treatment groups, regardless of gender. The overall 5-year recurrence rates were significantly higher in the ≥ 14 years, and < 20 years categories, and those of Group I showed similar trends. In Group II patients, those under 14 showed up to a 50% recurrence rate, nearly double that of other age categories.
A recent Korean study showed that the plateau of the pubertal growth spurt was at 14 years in girls and at 16 in boys25,32. The maximal growth velocity has tended to be faster25; therefore, 14 would be a better cutoff for Korean children to distinguish ages in volumetric growth from maturation periods. Age under 20 could suggest late physical maturation and end of adolescence. We assumed that patients under the growth spurt age were likely to be more susceptible than in maturation periods.
Several investigations have suggested that younger age, lower BMI, and delayed puberty could be risk factors for recurrence, and these findings are consistent with the results of this study4,8,20. Lower BMI was often observed in children prior to the pubertal growth spurt; children experienced increases in height earlier than weight gain. Delayed puberty was related to a postponed growth spurt because the acceleration of skeletal growth velocity was observed in the early stage of puberty22. In male patients aged ≤ 20, the recurrence rate was not significantly different. This finding was consistent with our hypothesis.
Our study revealed that the recurrence rates of female patients were significantly lower than those of males in all age categories (Supplementary Fig. S3A–C). These findings were quite different from previous studies that showed that the recurrence rates of females were significantly higher or had no association with gender. Female pneumothorax is related to gender-specific pulmonary abnormalities such as lymphangioleiomyomatosis or catamenial syndrome4,30,33. The exclusion of combined lung disease patients could have influenced our results.
The recurrence rate of a patient under the age of 14 who underwent conservative management was not statistically different between genders, but male patients who underwent surgical management showed higher recurrence rates (Supplementary Fig. S3D,G). This could suggest that developing lung parenchyma of a male experiencing a pubertal growth spurt tends to be more susceptible to mechanical damage. There are reported inconsistencies between growth in chest wall dimension and height increase in males, not in females34. Male growth is significantly greater, and male growth velocity is significantly faster22. This seemingly should be related to delayed maturation of the lung surface, resulting in fragility; however, no direct evidence of this has been reported34. Surgical intervention showed no statistically significant influence on recurrences between gender after adolescent periods in our study, and this could be indirect evidence for an inverse relationship between rapid growth and pleural strength.
Our study had several limitations. First, the reason for surgical intervention for enrolled patients was not clear. Usually, surgery could be recommended when the lung has not been expanded over 7 days, large bullae are noted, or there is a recurrence5,8,20. In our study, the surgery seemed to have occurred after the first PSP event. Although we tried to exclude secondary pneumothorax cases, other reasons needed for surgical intervention may remain. The results of our study could be significantly limited due to the potential selection bias stemmed from data extraction process. Health insurance claim data provide medical service use information under specific diagnostic codes and follow-up statistics, however, it does not secure the legitimacy of each treatment process. The lack of information relating with radiologic or pathologic findings essential for treatment strategies could cause severe skewedness in study materials, and therefore lead to inevitable restriction in data interpretation of our study.
Second, precocious characteristics such as height, weight, BMI, annual growth velocity, or family history can affect the recurrence rate4,15,31,33. We could not identify anthropometric variables, which can be related to recurrence. Finally, conventional treatment comprised a broad spectrum of therapeutic options, from simple observation to large bore chest tube insertion in this study. This lack of homogeneity among treatments could critically affect recurrence, but our results did not reflect these factors. Further evaluation for each treatment modality using a large patient population is necessary.
Limitations could be related to a lack of understanding of the air leak mechanism details. Although the presence of ELCs, bullae or blebs, could justify early surgical intervention for the prevention of recurrences12, the traditional concept as being main sources for occurrence makes this doubtful8,30. Notable pathologic lesions have not been reported in certain patients18, and the collateral ventilation system among pulmonary lobes has not been fully comprehended30.
Our study showed significant association between higher recurrence rates and surgical intervention in young PSP patients who did not complete their physical growth (children, preadolescence and adolescence). This does not guarantee that that surgery is a negative prognostic factor for recurrence because of significant possibility in data skewedness, however, increasing interest in less invasive treatment strategies for primary spontaneous pneumothorax23,35,36, serials of various conservative management could be considered before determination of surgery.
Conclusion
Higher recurrence rates after 1st episodes of PSP were significantly associated with adolescence, male and surgery. Patients of children and preadolescence in surgery group showed over 50% of recurrence rates. Adolescent patient showed higher recurrence both in conservative and surgical groups, however, the latter was significantly higher than the former. Incompleteness of physical growth could be related with higher recurrence of pneumothorax. The differences in recurrence rates in surgical group seemed to be decrease when the patients are in adult periods. Enrolled data from NHIS did not contain precious individual differences such as BMI, the size of detected bullae or necessity for surgical intervention, results should be considered carefully.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank eWorldEditing (www.eworldediting.com) for English language editing.
Abbreviations
- NHIS
National Health Insurance Service
- PSP
Primary spontaneous pneumothorax
- ELCs
Emphysema-like changes
- IRB
Institutional review board
- ICD
International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health problems
- BMI
Body mass index
- HR
Hazard ratio
- CI
Confidential interval
Author contributions
O.N. and S.L. is the guarantor of the content of the manuscript. E.Y. and J.E.P. provided substantial contribution to the conception or design of the work or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the content contained in the manuscript; and contributed to drafting, revising, and/or critically reviewing the manuscript for important intellectual content. J.H.C., C.B. and E.C. provided substantial contribution to methodology, conceptualization and validation. All authors contributed to final approval of the version to be published and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the works are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Data availability
The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary table and figures.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Eunjue Yi, Jun Eun Park, O Kyu Noh and Sungho Lee.
Contributor Information
O Kyu Noh, Email: okyu.noh@gmail.com.
Sungho Lee, Email: sholeemd@korea.ac.kr.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-023-39717-y.
References
- 1.Gupta D, Hansell A, Nichols T, Duong T, Ayres JG, Strachan D. Epidemiology of pneumothorax in England. Thorax. 2000;55(8):666–671. doi: 10.1136/thorax.55.8.666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kim D, Jung B, Jang B-H, Chung S-H, Lee YJ, Ha I-H. Epidemiology and medical service use for spontaneous pneumothorax: A 12-year study using nationwide cohort data in Korea. BMJ Open. 2019;9(10):e028624. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hallifax RJ, Goldacre R, Landray MJ, Rahman NM, Goldacre MJ. Trends in the incidence and recurrence of inpatient-treated spontaneous pneumothorax, 1968–2016. JAMA. 2018;320(14):1471–1480. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.14299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Walker SP, Bibby AC, Halford P, Stadon L, White P, Maskell NA. Recurrence rates in primary spontaneous pneumothorax: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. Respir. J. 2018;52(3):1800864. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00864-2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.MacDuff A, Arnold A, Harvey J. Management of spontaneous pneumothorax: British Thoracic Society pleural disease guideline 2010. Thorax. 2010;65(Suppl 2):ii18–ii31. doi: 10.1136/thx.2010.136986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Baumann MH, Strange C, Heffner JE, Light R, Kirby TJ, Klein J, Luketich JD, Panacek EA, Sahn SA. Management of spontaneous pneumothorax: An American College of Chest Physicians Delphi consensus statement. Chest. 2001;119(2):590–602. doi: 10.1378/chest.119.2.590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Leyn PD, Lismonde M, Ninane V, Noppen M, Slabbynck H, Meerhaeghe AV, Schil PV, Vermassen F. Belgian Society of Pneumology. Guidelines on the management of spontaneous pneumothorax. Acta Chir. Belg. 2005;105(3):265–267. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2005.11679714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tschopp J-M, Bintcliffe O, Astoul P, Canalis E, Driesen P, Janssen J, Krasnik M, Maskell N, Van Schil P, Tonia T. ERS task force statement: Diagnosis and treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Eur. Respir. J. 2015;46(2):321–335. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00219214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Furia S, Breda C. Primary spontaneous pneumothorax in children and adolescents: A systematic review. Pediatr. Med. 2019;2(2):12. doi: 10.21037/pm.2019.04.01. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Miscia ME, Lauriti G, Lisi G, Riccio A, Chiesa PL. Management of spontaneous pneumothorax in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2020;30(01):002–012. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3402522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Robinson PD, Cooper P, Ranganathan SC. Evidence-based management of paediatric primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Paediatr. Respir. Rev. 2009;10(3):110–117. doi: 10.1016/j.prrv.2008.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Daemen JH, Lozekoot PW, Maessen JG, Gronenschild MH, Bootsma GP, Hulsewé KW, Vissers YJ, de Loos ER. Chest tube drainage versus video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for a first episode of primary spontaneous pneumothorax: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2019;56(5):819–829. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Noh D, Lee S, Haam SJ, Paik HC, Lee DY. Recurrence of primary spontaneous pneumothorax in young adults and children. Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg. 2015;21(2):195–199. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Fujiwara T, Tanaka K, Toyoda T, Inage T, Sakairi Y, Ishibashi F, Suzuki H, Nakajima T, Yoshino I. Risk factors of postoperative recurrence of primary spontaneous pneumothorax. J. Thorac. Dis. 2020;12(11):6458. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-2436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hung W-T, Chen H-M, Wu C-H, Hsu W-M, Lin J-W, Chen J-S. Recurrence rate and risk factors for recurrence after thoracoscopic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax: A nationwide population-based study. J. Formos. Med. Assoc. 2021;120(10):1890–1896. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2020.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Schramel F, Postmus P, Vanderschueren R. Current aspects of spontaneous pneumothorax. Eur. Respir. J. 1997;10(6):1372–1379. doi: 10.1183/09031936.97.10061372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Khan OA, Tsang GM, Barlow CW, Amer KM. Routine histological analysis of resected lung tissue in primary spontaneous pneumothorax—Is it justified? Heart Lung Circ. 2006;15(2):137–138. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2005.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Belchis DA, Shekitka K, Gocke CD. A unique, histopathologic lesion in a subset of patients with spontaneous pneumothorax. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2012;136(12):1522–1527. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2012-0330-OA. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Noppen M, Dekeukeleire T, Hanon S, Stratakos G, Amjadi K, Madsen P, Meysman M, D'Haese J, Vincken W. Fluorescein-enhanced autofluorescence thoracoscopy in patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax and normal subjects. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2006;174(1):26–30. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200602-259OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wilson PM, Rymeski B, Xu X, Hardie W. An evidence-based review of primary spontaneous pneumothorax in the adolescent population. J. Am. Coll. Emerg. Phys. Open. 2021;2(3):e12449. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Akcam TI, Darcan S, Ozdil A, Kavurmaci O, Ergonul AG, Turhan K, Cakan A, Cagirici U. Is delayed puberty a new etiological factor for primary spontaneous pneumothorax? Curr. Thorac. Surg. 2019;4(1):21. doi: 10.26663/cts.2019.0004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Soliman A, De Sanctis V, Elalaily R, Bedair S. Advances in pubertal growth and factors influencing it: Can we increase pubertal growth? Indian J. Endocrinol. Metab. 2014;18(Suppl 1):S53. doi: 10.4103/2230-8210.145075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Brown SG, Ball EL, Perrin K, Asha SE, Braithwaite I, Egerton-Warburton D, Jones PG, Keijzers G, Kinnear FB, Kwan BC. Conservative versus interventional treatment for spontaneous pneumothorax. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;382:405–415. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1910775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hallifax RJ, McKeown E, Sivakumar P, Fairbairn I, Peter C, Leitch A, Knight M, Stanton A, Ijaz A, Marciniak S. Ambulatory management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax: An open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2020;396(10243):39–49. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31043-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lee Y, Mah Y. Skeletal age assessment of SMI and MP3 stages to predict the pubertal growth spurt. J. Korean Acad. Pediatr. Dent. 2019;46(3):233–238. doi: 10.5933/JKAPD.2019.46.3.233. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Baltag V, Takeuchi Y, Guthold R, Ambresin A-E. Assessing and supporting adolescents' capacity for autonomous decision-making in health-care settings: New guidance from the world health organization. J. Adolesc. Health. 2022;71(1):10–13. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2022.04.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Takahashi F, Takihara T, Nakamura N, Horio Y, Enokida K, Hayama N, Oguma T, Aoki T, Masayuki I, Asano K. Etiology and prognosis of spontaneous pneumothorax in the elderly. Geriatr. Gerontol. Int. 2020;20(10):878–884. doi: 10.1111/ggi.13996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Soler LM, Raymond SL, Larson SD, Taylor JA, Islam S. Initial primary spontaneous pneumothorax in children and adolescents: Operate or wait? J. Pediatr. Surg. 2018;53(10):1960–1963. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.12.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sihoe AD, Yim AP, Lee TW, Wan S, Yuen EH, Wan IY, Arifi AA. Can CT scanning be used to select patients with unilateral primary spontaneous pneumothorax for bilateral surgery? Chest. 2000;118(2):380–383. doi: 10.1378/chest.118.2.380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Bintcliffe OJ, Hallifax RJ, Edey A, Feller-Kopman D, Lee YG, Marquette CH, Tschopp J-M, West D, Rahman NM, Maskell NA. Spontaneous pneumothorax: Time to rethink management? Lancet Respir. Med. 2015;3(7):578–588. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00220-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Dagnegård HH, Rosén A, Sartipy U, Bergman P. Recurrence rate after thoracoscopic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Scand. Cardiovasc. J. 2017;51(4):228–232. doi: 10.1080/14017431.2017.1316419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Chae HW, Suh I, Kwon AR, Kim YJ, Kim YH, Kang DR, Kim HY, Oh SM, Kim HC, Kim DH. Longitudinal standards for height and height velocity in Korean children and adolescents: The Kangwha Cohort Study. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2013;28(10):1512–1517. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2013.28.10.1512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Noppen M. Spontaneous pneumothorax: Epidemiology, pathophysiology and cause. Eur. Respir. Rev. 2010;19(117):217–219. doi: 10.1183/09059180.00005310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Mahmoud O, Granell R, Tilling K, Minelli C, Garcia-Aymerich J, Holloway JW, Custovic A, Jarvis D, Sterne J, Henderson J. Association of height growth in puberty with lung function. A longitudinal study. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2018;198(12):1539–1548. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201802-0274OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hallifax RJ, Roberts M, Russell N, Laskawiec-Szkonter M, Walker SP, Maskell NA, Rahman NM. Pneumothorax management: Current state of practice in the UK. Respir. Res. 2022;23(1):1–4. doi: 10.1186/s12931-022-01943-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Aujayeb, A. Spontaneous Pneumothorax: New Horizons, vol. 1 80–83 (MDPI, 2021).
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary table and figures.