Skip to main content
Molecular and Cellular Biology logoLink to Molecular and Cellular Biology
. 1999 Jun;19(6):4343–4354. doi: 10.1128/mcb.19.6.4343

timrit Lengthens Circadian Period in a Temperature-Dependent Manner through Suppression of PERIOD Protein Cycling and Nuclear Localization

Akira Matsumoto 1, Kenji Tomioka 2, Yoshihiko Chiba 2,, Teiichi Tanimura 1,*
PMCID: PMC104394  PMID: 10330175

Abstract

A fundamental feature of circadian clocks is temperature compensation of period. The free-running period of ritsu (timrit) (a novel allele of timeless [tim]) mutants is drastically lengthened in a temperature-dependent manner. PER and TIM protein levels become lower in timrit mutants as temperature becomes higher. This mutation reduces per mRNA but not tim mRNA abundance. PER constitutively driven by the rhodopsin1 promoter is lowered in rit mutants, indicating that timrit mainly affects the per feedback loop at a posttranscriptional level. An excess of per+ gene dosage can ameliorate all rit phenotypes, including the weak nuclear localization of PER, suggesting that timrit affects circadian rhythms by reducing PER abundance and its subsequent transportation into nuclei as temperature increases.


Circadian rhythms are universal biological phenomena found in eucaryotes and some procaryotes, and they are thought to be an adaptation to environmental cycles. A circadian clock governs the rhythms through physiological and endocrinological processes. The circadian clock keeps its period even when there are no environmental time cues. In addition, the clock’s free-running period remains relatively constant with a change in temperature of 10°C, and the temperature quotient, Q10, is approximately 1. The biochemical mechanisms underlying circadian rhythms are clearly distinct from biochemical reactions observed in other physiological and developmental events, because the Q10 of those reactions is nearly 2 to 3.

Genetic studies using Drosophila mutants have facilitated our understanding of the molecular bases of the circadian clock. Five genes in Drosophila, period (per), timeless (tim), dClock (dClk), cycle (cyc), and double-time (dbt), have been identified as clock genes that contribute to a central oscillator mechanism (1, 31, 36, 40). The abundance of per and tim mRNAs and their protein levels fluctuate in a circadian manner (40), and dCLK and CYC are thought to form a heterodimer to act as transcriptional activators of per and tim (6). PER interacts with TIM (12), moves from the cytoplasm into the nucleus (5), and feeds back to repress the level of the per and tim transcripts (14, 16).

Although the molecular mechanism used to generate circadian fluctuation has been extensively studied, there are only a few molecular studies in Drosophila on the temperature compensation mechanism. At a behavioral level, per mutants affect not only period length but also temperature compensation; perT and perL mutants slightly shorten and lengthen their periods, respectively, as temperature increases (8, 18, 19). Several molecular studies suggested that temperature compensation is closely associated with PER. Huang et al. (15) reported that PER can undergo a temperature-independent intramolecular dimerization, while Gekakis et al. (12) showed that PERL exhibits a temperature-dependent defect in binding to TIM although the molecular interaction between TIM and PER is temperature compensated. Moreover, an allele of the tim gene, timSL, can compensate for a temperature-dependent period lengthening of perL (35). The length of the Thr-Gly repeat in PER is also reported to affect the temperature compensation (38).

We previously isolated ritsu (rit), a clock mutation on the second chromosome, from a natural population (26). We have now investigated features of rit and its interaction with per and tim at both the behavioral and molecular levels. rit mutants show abnormal temperature compensation of period and reduce PER and TIM levels. Molecular genetic analyses show that rit has a point mutation in the tim gene that leads to a single amino acid change, indicating rit is an allele of tim. Since an excess of the per gene dosage ameliorates the weak and delayed nuclear localization of PER as well as all other phenotypes of rit at both the molecular and behavioral levels, PER abundance in nuclei seems to be a key factor in the temperature compensation mechanism.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Stocks, locomotor rhythm recording, and mating procedures.

Flies were kept under LD12:12 (12 h of light and 12 h of dark) at 24°C. Canton-S was used as the wild type. per; rit double mutants were synthesized by standard crosses. Flies were grown at 24°C. Locomotor activity was recorded as described elsewhere (25). The period of a locomotor rhythm was calculated by chi-square periodogram analysis (43). Mating for the recombination test between tim and rit (see Fig. 5A) was done as follows. To produce flies carrying both the rit mutation and the per-lacZ fusion gene on the second chromosome, we crossed rit; ry females to per-SG:3; ry males which carry the per-lacZ fusion gene on the second chromosome. These strains carried the ry mutation on the third chromosome, and this eye color should be rescued if a fly has the per-lacZ fusion gene. After two generations, we selected rit per-lacZ homozygous flies based on the ry+ eye color and the long-period rit phenotype. The four lines were selected as a rit per-lacZ strain. The rit rh-per strain was produced by standard mating procedures using SM1/Sco; TM3/Pr (21). +/w+Y; rit, C(1)DX, y w f/w+Y; rit, Dp(2;Y)odd4.31; rit, Dp(2;Y)odd2.31; rit and w; rit strains were produced by mating procedures described elsewhere (25), with minor changes. The recombination test was done by two different mating procedures. The rit/tim females were mated to tim01 males in one cross and mated to SM1/Pm males in the other crosses. SM1/Pm flies show a normal rhythmicity and are designated +/+ in Fig. 3A (right). In both cases, progenies from these crosses were then monitored for locomotor rhythms at 30°C. If recombination between tim and rit occurs, there should be rit+ tim+/tim01 progenies whose rhythm is normal in the former cross. In the latter cross, rit tim/SM1 or rit tim/Pm double mutants whose rhythm is abnormal would be obtained if recombination occurs.

FIG. 5.

FIG. 5

PER and TIM abundance in wild-type and rit flies at various temperatures. Adult head homogenates were obtained from flies entrained at 24, 27, and 30°C and subjected to Western blot analysis using anti-TIM antibody followed by anti-PER antibody as described in Materials and Methods. TIM and PER bands in panel A were quantified by densitometry. Measurements obtained at each point were normalized by the maximum value for wild-type flies under each condition. (B) Mean abundances of TIM and PER. Values at each point were means of three to nine experiments. Vertical bars show standard errors of the means. Asterisks indicate that the mean value for rit flies is significantly different from that for wild-type flies (t test, P < 0.05). Data for rit flies obtained at 30°C were classified into two groups (bottom row in panel B; see also Results for details). (C and D) Under constant darkness at 30°C, no or very weak cycling is indicated by the data from 8 h of sampling in both proteins. Experiments were independently done two and three times for TIM and PER, respectively (D). Light regimens are indicated (white symbols, light; black symbols, dark).

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3

rit is a novel allele of tim. (A) Mating schemes to test whether recombination occurs between rit and tim01. All genotypes and their expected period in the second generation, assuming that recombination occurs, are listed. Rhythmicities were judged by chi-square periodogram analysis (43) ranging from 19 to 29 h. The arrhythmic category includes flies showing an extra long period over the circadian range. See Results for details. (B) Schematic representation of the coding region in the timrit cDNA. The coding sequence is indicated by a box. The arrow lines indicate PCR fragments amplified for sequencing. Amino acid numbering is as specified by Myers et al. (29); domains indicated by closed boxes are based on the study by Saez and Young (37). Met, translation start; NLS, nuclear localization signal; CLD, cytoplasmic localization domain.

RNase protection assay.

Flies were entrained in LD12:12 for 5 days before they were collected. Total RNAs were extracted from 50 fly heads in 500 μl of extraction buffer (15 mM sodium acetate, 5 mM EDTA, 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS], 0.01% diethyl pyrocarbonate, 50 mM Tris [pH 9.0]). RNase-free DNase (Boehringer) was used to remove contaminated DNA. RNase protection assays were done as described elsewhere (14), with minor modifications. We used the per5 and TIMAX1 probes and ribosomal protein 49 (rp49) as a control. The per5 probe is a genomic fragment of the per gene containing about 210 bp (bp 5849 to 6060) of the per exon 5. TIMAX1 is a cDNA fragment of the tim gene from bp 4963 to 5192 (39). We found that the abundance of rp49 in samples obtained at 30°C was half as much as that at 24°C, although the reason was unknown. Therefore, each measurement was normalized by the value of the peak level for wild-type flies at each temperature.

Immunoblot analyses.

Protein extracts were made from 50 fly heads for each time point as described by Edery et al. (7), with minor modifications. Each sample was homogenized in 15 μl of ice-cold extraction buffer, and the tip of the homogenizing pestle was rinsed twice with another 15 μl of extraction buffer. Amounts of proteins in a total of 45 μl of extraction buffer were measured by the Bradford protein assay system (Bio-Rad). After the measurement, extraction buffer was added to bring the protein concentration to 5 μg/μl in each sample. Five-microliter aliquots of 3× SDS sample buffer were added to 10-μl samples and boiled for 5 min. Supernatants were loaded on SDS–5% polyacrylamide gels. Western blotting was done as described previously (7), with minor modifications. We used anti-TIM antibody (donated by J. Blau) diluted 1:5,000. Horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-rat immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody (Cappel) was used as a secondary antibody, diluted 1:3,000. For quantitating chemiluminescence (SuperSignal CL-HRP substrate system; Pierce), an exposure on X-ray film (Fuji film) was digitally imaged by Densito Graph (ATTO) and quantified by NIH Image software. After the exposure, the membrane used was incubated for 3 h in the substrate buffer to eliminate HRP activity. Then the membrane was used to detect PER abundance as follows. We used anti-PER antibody (donated by R. Stanewsky) diluted 1:10,000. HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG antibody (Cappel) was used as a secondary antibody, diluted 1:3,000. Exposure and quantification were done as described above.

Histology.

Expression of the per gene in rit flies was assayed histologically by using the per-lacZ fusion gene as a reporter. Flies at ZT18 (zeitgebertime 18 h) and ZT6 were frozen in liquid nitrogen and mounted into O.C.T. compound (Tissue-Tek). Sections of 10 μm were cut and stained with 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-d-galactopyranoside (X-Gal). The staining procedure was done as described by Liu et al. (22). Head sections of wild-type and rit flies were embedded side by side on the same slide to compare the staining profiles of the two strains. Photographs were taken with a Zeiss AxioPhot microscope. For fluorescent immunostaining with anti-PER antibody, the white-eyed strain was used as the wild type to eliminate background fluorescence of eye pigment. For the same purpose, the w; rit double mutant was used. Sections (14 μm) of the two strains were embedded side by side on the same slide to facilitate comparison of the strengths of signals. Anti-PER antibody was applied at a dilution of 1:15,000. Anti-rabbit IgG conjugated to peroxidase-labeled dextran polymer (EnVision +; Dako) was applied as a secondary antibody. Signals were enhanced with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-Tyramide (NEN). The Tyramide signal amplification reaction was usually done for 7.5 min; to obtain a maximum sensitivity, it was extended to 15 min. Counterstaining of nuclei was done with propidium iodide (1 μg/μl; Sigma) after RNase (10 μg/μl; Boehringer) treatment for 30 min. The double-staining images were visualized with a Zeiss LSM410 confocal laser scan microscope equipped with a krypton-argon laser.

Reverse transcription-PCR and cDNA sequence.

Total RNA from 50 heads obtained from rit flies at ZT18 at 24°C were reverse transcribed by using a Ready-To-Go T-primed first-strand kit (Pharmacia). Using four tim-specific primer sets (tim237-258 plus tim1245-1226, tim914-933 plus tim1835-1816, tim1813-1834 plus tim3404-3383, and tim3122-3142 plus tim4474-4453; numbers are based on the nucleotide position of the tim cDNA [28]), fragments were amplified and cloned into the pCRII vector (Invitrogen). Amplified fragments too large to be sequenced were digested by restriction enzymes and subcloned. Both strands of each clone were sequenced at least twice with an ALFred DNA sequencer (Pharmacia). Experiments were repeated at least twice to avoid PCR errors. Fragments from tim bp 3122 to 4553 amplified from the wild-type or rit strain, a region which includes the nucleotide change from CCG to GCG, were digested by EcoRI at 37°C for 3 h. The digestion occurred in the wild-type fragment but not in the rit fragment.

RESULTS

rit alters free-running periods in a temperature-dependent manner.

Locomotor activity rhythms of individual flies were recorded under LD12:12 for 3 days followed by constant darkness (DD). The rit strain was entrained to LD12:12 at 24°C and showed a lengthened circadian rhythm under DD; its period was about 2 h longer than that of the wild type (Fig. 1A and C). We then measured the period of rit flies at different temperatures (Fig. 1A). When the temperature was lower than 24°C, the period of rit flies was only slightly lengthened, with a Q10 of 0.93, which was comparable to that of wild-type flies (Q10 = 1). When the temperature was above 24°C, the period of rit flies lengthened remarkably to about 10 h longer than that of wild-type flies at 30°C (Fig. 1A). Thus, above 24°C, the Q10 of rit flies was 0.62, which is significantly different from the wild-type value of 1. This phenotype is recessive since the period of heterozygous rit/+ flies were well temperature compensated (Fig. 1C).

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1

rit lengthens circadian periods as temperature increases. (A and B) Locomotor activity records at various temperatures for rit (A) and perL; rit (B) flies. Flies were held in LD12:12 for the first 3 days and then kept in DD. Light regimens (white bars, light; black bars, dark) are indicated above the tetraplotted (4 days) actograms. (C) Changes in period at various temperatures. Mean values at 20, 28, and 30°C were calculated to combine data at 19 and 20, 27 and 28, and 29 and 30°C, respectively. ○, strains carrying no mutation on the second chromosome (Canton-S, perL, and perS); ●, strains carrying the rit mutation (rit, perL; rit and perS; rit). ▾, heterozygous rit/+ strain. Vertical bars show standard errors of the means. Numbers beside symbols represent the numbers of rhythmic flies. Q10 values are separately represented when the changes in period are different between the temperature ranges below and above 24°C.

Genetic interaction between rit and per.

rit strongly interacts with perL with respect to period lengthening. The double mutant of rit (25.5 h at 24°C) with perL (28.5 h at 24°C) showed a period of 32.9 h at 24°C (Fig. 1B). This is ∼2 h longer than the value expected (31 h) on the basis of an additive effect of the two mutations. At 27°C, perL; rit flies showed an extremely long period of 44.4 h (Fig. 1B). Although these periods are extraordinary long, the rhythmicity itself was still clear and stable, with a punctual onset and offset of the active phase. While only 2 of 25 flies were arrhythmic at 27°C, most rit flies became arrhythmic at 30°C (Table 1). One fly that was rhythmic at 30°C revealed an extremely long period of 50.4 h (Fig. 1B). Even in this case, we observed a stable rhythmicity. The Q10 of the double mutant was drastically lower (Q10 = 0.46) than that of the perL mutant (Q10 = 0.88) above 24°C.

TABLE 1.

Percentages of arrhythmic flies at various temperatures

Strain % Arrhythmic flies (total no. tested) at:
16°C 19°C 24°C 27°C 30°C
Canton-S 48.4 (31) 21.6 (37) 4.1 (74) 0.0 (22) 19.0 (21)
rit/+ 19.0 (21) 14.3 (28) 9.5 (21) 0.0 (17) 9.7 (31)
rit 17.4 (69) 9.1 (44) 0.0 (20) 24.8 (105) 84.4 (32)
perL 21.4 (14) 33.3 (24) 4.4 (68) 0.0 (11) 17.6 (17)
perL; rit 13.3 (15) 10.0 (30) 0.0 (16) 8.0 (25) 96.7 (30)
perS 33.3 (12) 8.7 (23) 2.2 (46) 0.0 (18) 18.2 (22)
perS; rit 18.8 (16) 9.5 (22) 0.0 (26) 25.5 (51) 76.5 (17)

The period lengthening also occurred in the double mutant with perS (Fig. 1C). The period of perS; rit flies was 6 h longer than that of perS flies at 27°C, which corresponds to the value expected on the basis of an additive effect. Only 2 of 15 flies were found to be rhythmic at 30°C. The periods were ca. 24 h, which is 5 h longer than the period in perS flies at this temperature. The Q10 of perS; rit flies was 0.92, not significantly different from that of perS flies. Thus, there is an allele specificity in the interaction between rit and per: a drastic effect in perL and a minimal effect in perS.

rit induces arrhythmicity at higher temperature.

We observed that a majority of rit flies become arrhythmic at temperatures higher than 24°C (Table 1). When the temperature was 24°C, flies were quite rhythmic in all strains used in this study. At the lowest and highest temperatures tested (16 and 30°C), a portion of wild-type flies and of per mutants showed arrhythmicity (Table 1). This is because overall locomotor activity tends to be reduced at 16°C (data not shown). At high temperatures (30°C), some flies were statistically arrhythmic, although a weak but stable rhythmicity could be observed by eye in all plots.

The proportion of arrhythmic flies homozygous for the rit mutation was not different from that in wild-type and per mutants in the range from 16 to 24°C. On the contrary, the proportion of arrhythmic flies at 27 and 30°C was remarkably high in all strains homozygous for the rit mutation (Table 1). While perL; rit flies exhibited extraordinarily long periods at 27°C, 29 of 30 flies were arrhythmic at 30°C. Such arrhythmicity would occur when the period lengthened beyond the circadian range. Alternatively, the arrhythmicity would be directly induced by rit at higher temperatures. The latter possibility is supported by the finding that perS; rit flies showed a period of ca. 24 h at 30°C, but 76.5% of these flies were arrhythmic.

An excess of per gene dosage ameliorates the rit phenotype.

rit males and females, carrying a per+ gene translocation on the Y chromosome (w+Y), were produced to test if an additional per+ dosage affects periodicity in rit. In +/w+Y; rit male flies, the per gene dosage is double that of a wild-type male, while attached-X [C(1)DX]/w+Y; rit females have 1.5 times more per gene dosage than wild-type males because per is on the X chromosome (3). A per gene dosage of 2 completely rescued the rit phenotype behaviorally; its period was normal and temperature compensated (Fig. 2A). When the per gene dosage was 1.5 in C(1)DX/w+Y; rit flies, the rit phenotype was rescued at lower temperature but incompletely rescued at higher temperature (Fig. 2A).

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2

Duplication of the per+ and tim+ genes restores the extra long period in rit flies. (A) The rit phenotype is restored by the per+ gene translocation in a dosage-dependent manner. +/w+Y; rit is the rit male carrying the per+ gene translocation on the Y chromosome; C(1)DX represents females carrying the attached X chromosome. (B) Complementation test with tim01. tim01 does not complement rit, and the tim+ gene translocation restores the rit phenotype. The per+ gene translocation also restores the phenotype shown in rit/tim flies. (C) The rit phenotype is restored by the tim duplication. Dp(2;Y)odd4.13 and Dp(2;Y)odd2.31 carry the tim+ gene translocation on the Y chromosome. Numbers beside symbols represent the numbers of flies showing rhythmicity at each temperature.

Complementation and recombination tests with tim.

The rit locus was roughly mapped near the cl gene (26). Since this position is near the tim locus, rit could be an allele of tim. To determine if this is the case, we tested whether rit could complement tim01 (a null allele of tim [28]). Locomotor activity rhythms of tim01/rit flies were recorded at various temperatures from 19 to 30°C (Fig. 2B). rit/tim01 heterozygotes phenocopied the rit phenotype. The period in these heterozygotes at each temperature was, however, about 1 h shorter than the period in rit homozygotes (t test, P < 0.05). We obtained a similar result in assays using Df(2L)tim02 (data not shown), which deletes the entire tim gene (28). Since the temperature dependency of period in rit/tim heterozygotes phenocopied rit homozygotes and the phenotype of rit is rescued by duplication of the per locus as described above, we expected that the phenotype in rit/tim heterozygotes would also be rescued by the per duplication. Male flies having a per gene dosage of 2 showed normal periods at various temperatures (Fig. 2B).

A duplication of the tim+ gene was tested to determine if it could complement the temperature-dependent period lengthening caused by the rit mutation (Fig. 2C). Dp(2;Y)odd4.31; rit/rit and Dp(2;Y)odd2.31; rit/rit flies, both of which carry a tim+ duplication on the Y chromosome, showed periods of about 26 h at every temperature (Fig. 2C). Given that null alleles of tim did not complement rit and duplications bearing tim corrected the rit phenotype with respect to the temperature compensation of period, we suspected that rit is an allele of tim. However, it remains a formal possibility that trans heterozygotes between a null mutant of tim and a clock mutant closely mapped near the tim gene will show similar phenotypes.

We then examined whether recombination occurs between rit and tim. Females having the rit mutation on one second chromosome and the tim01 mutation on the other were mated to tim01 males (Fig. 3A, cross 1). Progenies from this cross were then monitored for their locomotor rhythms at 30°C. If the rit mutation is not allelic to tim, there should be recombinant progenies that show a nearly normal period among the majority of arrhythmic flies. We tested a total of 546 progenies and failed to obtain any significant circadian rhythmicity by the chi-square periodogram (43) ranging from 19 to 29 h. Furthermore, we crossed tim01/rit females to males which are phenotypically wild type with respect to circadian rhythm (Fig. 3A, cross 2). If a recombination between rit and tim occurs, rit tim01/+ progeny would be expected to show a very long period or an arrhythmic phenotype like rit/tim01 flies at 30°C. Circadian rhythms of about 700 flies obtained were recorded, and none was categorized as a recombinant. These data support the result of the complementation test which indicates that rit is an allele of tim.

rit encodes an amino acid substitution in TIM.

The coding region of tim cDNA in rit flies was amplified by reverse transcription-PCR. The fragments amplified were sequenced and compared to the tim+ cDNA previously described (28, 29). To avoid PCR errors, experiments were independently repeated twice and sequence data were confirmed for each repeat. There were 16 mutations between rit and tim+ at the nucleotide level. Among these, 14 were silent mutations that do not cause a change in the amino acid sequence. We found a single-base deletion at position 294 (numbering according to references 28 and 29) in the noncoding region (Fig. 3B). This deletion has been described as a mutation which has no effect on circadian rhythm in three Drosophila species, including Drosophila melanogaster (33). There is a missense mutation which produced an amino acid substitution at bp 3492 from the start point of the tim cDNA (Fig. 3B). At this point, the nucleotide change from CCG to GCG yields an amino acid change from proline to alanine (Fig. 3B) at amino acid 1093 in TIM protein (numbering according to reference 29). Since there is an EcoRI site at this position (Fig. 3B), we confirmed that this mutation abolishes the restriction of the timrit cDNA by EcoRI at this region (data not shown). Taken together, the results led us to conclude that rit is an allele of tim. Hereafter, we use rit as an allele name and timrit to designate a mutation.

rit lowered expression and protein abundances in tim and per mRNAs.

We measured per and tim mRNA cycling in fly heads by RNase protection assay. Flies entrained in LD12:12 were collected every 4 h. RNA abundance was normalized by the peak value (at ZT13) of the wild-type per and tim mRNAs at 24°C (Fig. 4A). Wild-type flies at 24°C exhibited robust mRNA cyclings with the peak at ZT13 to ZT17 and a trough at ZT1, meaning that these mRNA cyclings are in phase. The tim mRNA also cycled in rit flies at 24°C but with a delayed peak. The levels of tim mRNA in rit flies were not significantly different from those in the wild type at each time, while the peak value of per mRNA in rit flies was reduced to about 70% (t test, P < 0.05) (Fig. 4B). At 30°C, the peak of per and tim mRNA cyclings in the wild type was delayed compared to that at 24°C (Fig. 4C). The shape of tim mRNA cycling in rit flies at 30°C was quite similar to that at 24°C (Fig. 4D). The abundance of per mRNA at the peak (ZT17) decreased to 60% (t test, P < 0.05). Thus, the amplitude of per mRNA cycling becomes smaller as temperature increases, while tim mRNA is not affected in rit.

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4

Daily patterns of per and tim mRNA cyclings under LD. RNase protection assays were performed on total RNAs from wild-type and rit flies entrained in LD12:12 at 24°C (A and B) and at 30°C (C and D). See Materials and Methods for details. Values at each point are means of three to eight experiments. Vertical bars show standard errors of the means. Light regimens are indicated (white bars, light; black bars, dark). We defined the lights-on point as ZT0 and the lights-off point as ZT12. Asterisks indicate that the mean value for rit flies is significantly different from that for wild-type flies (t test, P < 0.05).

We next analyzed the levels of TIM and PER protein abundance by Western blotting. PER and TIM abundances cycle in rit flies under LD12:12 at 24°C, where the peak was at ZT18 and the trough was at ZT6 to ZT10 (Fig. 5A). The shape and phase of these protein fluctuations were similar to those in wild-type flies except that the peak level was reduced ∼30% (Fig. 5B). At 27°C, when rit flies show a longer free-running period of locomotor activity rhythms, the amplitude of PER and TIM cycling was reduced. These peaks dropped to nearly half of the wild-type level (Fig. 5A and B). At 30°C, where 80% of rit flies become behaviorally arrhythmic, rit flies showed two types of protein cycling with respect to peak levels. One is similar to the result observed at 27°C; the peak abundance of PER and TIM became about half of the wild-type level, and their amplitudes were reduced (Fig. 5A, 30°C-1; Fig. 5B, rit-1). Four of ten experiments were classified into this type. The remaining six were categorized into another type (Fig. 5A, 30°C-2). In this type, TIM fluctuated with a nearly normal shape with the peak level of 80%, while the amplitude of PER fluctuation was reduced. The peak and trough levels of PER were 80 and 50% of the wild-type peak level, respectively (Fig. 5B, rit-2). In either case, the amplitude of PER cycling in rit decreased as the temperature rose. The rhythmic mobility shift by phosphorylation is reported to occur in the PER band (7, 31, 32). A nearly normal phosphorylation of PER occurs at both 24 and 27°C, while PER usually (but not always) seems to be hypophosphorylated at 30°C regardless of whether PER abundance cycled.

Since most rit flies were behaviorally arrhythmic in DD at 30°C, we investigated whether the cyclings of PER and TIM were also abolished in rit flies in DD (Fig. 5C). The levels of these proteins increased to half of the wild-type peaks. TIM and PER levels do not show rhythmic fluctuations, though some random variability in their levels is apparent.

rit affects per mRNA abundance at a posttranscriptional level.

rit appears to lower per mRNA abundance and amplitude of PER protein cycling, while tim mRNA abundance is not affected but TIM protein abundance decreases. One possible reason for this finding is that rit primarily affects the per mRNA transcription level; another possibility is that rit reduces PER abundance, which in turn may decrease per mRNA abundance through the per feedback loop. To solve this problem, we produced a rit; rh-per strain and measured its PER abundance. In rh-per flies, per is strongly driven by rhodopsin1 promoter in eyes independent of the innate per gene expression (45). If PER is reduced in rit; rh-per flies, rit should affect PER at a posttranscriptional level. The PER level in the strain carrying rh-per was about 80% lower in rit+ flies than in rit flies. This is obvious at 30°C (Fig. 6A). This result suggests that rit affects the per feedback loop at a posttranscriptional level. PER seemed to be hypophosphorylated in the rit background at 30°C when the mobility shifts were examined by side-by-side comparisons at ZT2 (Fig. 6A).

FIG. 6.

FIG. 6

rit affects PER abundance at a posttranscriptional level. (A) Constitutive expression of PER, using the rh1-per fusion gene. Flies were collected at ZT2 except for one wild-type strain collected at ZT18 as a control. PER bands detected by Western blot analysis using anti-PER antibody were quantified and were normalized by the PER level of the wild type. +, wild-type (Canton-S); rit/+, heterozygous rit; rh-per, protein extracts were obtained from flies carrying the rh-per construct. Lysates were obtained from the following strains: wild type as a control (lane 1), wild type (lanes 2 and 7), rit (lanes 3 and 8), rh-per (lanes 4 and 9), rit; rh-per (lanes 5 and 10), and rit/+; rh-per (lanes 6 and 12). Values at each point were means of four experiments. Asterisks indicate that the mean value for rit; rh-per flies is significantly different from that for rh-per flies at the same temperature (t test, P < 0.05). Vertical bars show standard errors of the means. (B) Daily fluctuation of PER and TIM in rit flies with an excess per gene dosage. Adult head homogenates were obtained from flies entrained at 30°C. Values at each point were normalized by the maximum value for the wild type. Values at each point were means of four experiments. Vertical bars show standard errors of the means. Light regimens are indicated (white bars, light; black bars, dark).

At a behavioral level, the excess of per gene dosage rescued the rit phenotype. To determine if PER and TIM protein cycling is also rescued by the per duplication, we measured their abundances at 30°C. TIM and PER proteins showed a clear cycling with peak levels twice and three times the wild-type level, respectively (Fig. 6B). The lower amplitude of PER cycling shown in rit flies at 30°C was rescued to normal in +/w+Y; rit flies. Interestingly, TIM abundance was also increased in +/w+Y; rit flies even though only per dosage was increased.

Levels of PER translocated into the nucleus are lowered in a rit background.

The spatial pattern of per expression can be monitored by lacZ expression in transformant flies carrying a per-lacZ fusion gene (22). This fusion gene contains one-half of the per coding region, ca. 4 kb of 5′ flanking region, and the entire coding region of the lacZ gene derived from Escherichia coli. per-lacZ and rit per-lacZ flies were entrained under LD12:12 at 24 or 30°C for 3 to 5 days. Sections of wild-type and rit flies were incubated with X-Gal for 2 h at 37°C. In both strains at 24°C (Fig. 7A and B), there were lacZ-positive cells in optic lobes (lamina and medulla) and the central brain. The expression pattern was principally coincident with the previous study (22). Nuclei in photoreceptor cells were stained strongly in wild-type but only weakly in rit flies at 24°C.

FIG. 7.

FIG. 7

Nuclear localization of PER is impaired in rit flies. Horizontal section of fly heads stained with X-Gal (A to D and E). The spatial pattern of per gene expression was monitored by using the per-lacZ fusion gene. Horizontal head sections in wild-type and rit flies kept at 24°C (A and B) or 30°C (C and D) were stained for 2 h at 37°C. per was expressed in retina (ret), optic lobes (lamina [la], medulla [me], and lobula [lo]), and central brain (br) in wild-type flies (A and C). Nuclei in photoreceptor cells are clearly stained (arrowheads) in wild-type but not rit flies at both 24 and 30°C. Staining of LNs is indicated by black arrows. The expression level in the PER–β-Gal fusion protein in rit flies is lower than that in wild-type flies. Such a weak PER localization in nuclei was rescued by the excess of per+ gene dosage in +/w+Y; rit even at 30°C (E). The scale bar represents 80 μm.

While the pattern of per-lacZ expression at 30°C was similar to that at 24°C in wild-type flies (Fig. 7C), there were few lacZ-positive cells in the optic lobes and brains of rit flies (Fig. 7D). lacZ expression in nuclei of the eyes was very weak in rit flies at 30°C (Fig. 7D), suggesting that PER localization in nuclei is much lower in rit than in wild-type flies.

We next checked whether the weak staining of PER–β-galactosidase (β-Gal) could be rescued in the +/w+Y; rit strain, because not only the aberrant locomotor rhythm but also the weak cycling of PER was rescued by the excess per gene dosage in rit. The level of staining of PER–β-Gal in brain and photoreceptors and their nuclear localization especially in photoreceptor cells were rescued (Fig. 7E).

Nuclear localizations of PER in lateral neurons (LNs) were examined by anti-PER antibody with fluorescent probes (FITC; green color in Fig. 8) at ZT19, -21, and -23.5 at 30°C. Counterstaining of nuclei was done with propidium iodide (red color in Fig. 8). Sections from about 50 heads of each strain were observed at each time point of day. Nuclei in photoreceptor cells were clearly stained in wild-type flies through ZT19 to ZT23.5 (Fig. 8A to C). PER was cytoplasmic in LNs at ZT19 and in nuclei at ZT21 and ZT23.5 (Fig. 8D to F). This temporal regulation of PER nuclear entry is consistent with a previous report (5). The strength of PER signal increases throughout a time course of a day. Compared with wild-type signals, signals of PER in photeoreceptors and LNs in rit flies were weak although the staining pattern is comparable to the wild-type pattern (Fig. 8G to I). To reveal the cellular localization of PER in rit, we lengthened the incubation time of the FITC-Tyramide reaction to 15 min. PER was cytoplasmic in LNs at ZT19 (Fig. 8J and M). At ZT21, the pattern of PER localization in LNs could be classified into three groups. First, PER is in the cytoplasm, as shown in the center and right upper corner in Fig. 8N. One-third of LNs observed were classified in this group. Second, PER was in both cytoplasm and nucleus (middle left in Fig. 8N). Third, PER was clearly in nuclei (inset in Fig. 8N). This pattern was observed in less than 10% of all LNs. At ZT23.5, a clear nuclear entry of PER was observed in about half of LNs (Fig. 8O), while PER stayed in the cytoplasm in the remaining LNs (inset in Fig. 8O). These variations of PER nuclear entry at ZT21 and ZT23.5 were found among LNs from the same individual. For example, Fig. 8O and its inset were obtained as different confocal planes of the same preparation. In summary, the abundance of PER in LNs of rit flies was lower than for wild-type flies through ZT19 to ZT23.5, supporting the results of assays using a per-lacZ fusion gene and Western blotting, and the nuclear entry of PER in LNs is thought to be temporally delayed and/or not to occur in nearly half of LNs in rit flies.

FIG. 8.

FIG. 8

PER localization in lateral neurons at 30°C. Horizontal sections of fly heads obtained at ZT19, -21, and -23.5 were stained with anti-PER antibody coupled to FITC (green color). Counterstaining of nuclei was done with propidium iodide (red color) after RNase treatment. When PER staining overlaps nuclear staining, yellow color is observed. For symbols, see the legend to Fig. 7. In wild-type flies (A to C), PER signals are comparable to those seen with X-Gal staining in Fig. 7C. LNs at a magnification of ×8 are represented in panels D to F. PER signal is observed in the cytoplasm at ZT19 and in nuclei at both ZT21 and ZT23.5. In rit flies (G to I), staining similar to that in wild-type flies can be observed, although the PER signal is weaker especially in the LNs (J to L). Thus, images in which PER signals were amplified are illustrated (M to O). PER is in the cytoplasm at ZT19 (J and M). At ZT21, there are three patterns of PER staining surrounding a nucleus (center and right upper corner in panel N), overlapping in a nucleus of the center of a broad PER staining area (middle left in panel N), and just overlapping in nuclei (inset in panel N). At ZT23.5, PER enters nuclei (O) or stays in the cytoplasm (inset in panel O).

DISCUSSION

rit, a new allele of tim, lengthens or abolishes circadian locomotor rhythms in a temperature-dependent manner. Thus, timrit appears to affect a temperature compensation of period which is one of the most important features of circadian rhythms. However, rit can be regarded as a temperature-sensitive (ts) mutation lengthening a circadian period depending on temperature. Several studies have been performed to determine the mechanism of temperature compensation in Drosophila (12, 15, 38; reviewed in reference 13), but the molecular mechanism has not been defined. Therefore, at present we cannot distinguish a ts mutation of period from a temperature compensation mutation. However, the following results led us to consider how rit affects the circadian rhythm. A tim duplication rescues the abnormal phenotype of temperature compensation in the circadian period of rit, while the period of rit flies having the duplication of tim was still 2 h longer than in wild-type flies. In addition, rit/+ heterozygotes showed a period 1 h longer at all temperature ranges tested. These data mean that the timrit mutation is recessive for the temperature-dependent lengthening of period but semidominant for the temperature-independent lengthening of period. Thus, the tim+ gene enables the circadian system not only to maintain circadian period but also to compensate the period against temperature such that a half dosage of tim+ is enough for function. Our point that tim contributes to the temperature compensation mechanism as well as the maintenance of period is supported by studies of another tim allele, timSL. This mutant restores temperature compensation (or a ts effect of lengthening period) to perL flies (35). Since timSL in the per+ background shows a nearly normal period at all temperature ranges tested (35), timSL may affect temperature compensation rather than keep circadian period constant. In summary, we conclude that rit is a mutation of temperature compensation rather than a ts mutation of period.

The mutation site of timrit, where the amino acid substitution occurs, is separated from that of timSL with respect to the primary structure of TIM. The mutation site of timrit is outside neither the nuclear localization domain nor the dimerization domain with PER (37). Given the behavior phenotype, the extra long locomotor period of rit flies at higher temperatures is similar to that reported for TIM1 transformant flies which lack a 32-amino-acid region in tim cDNA (30). Since our sequence data indicate that this region of tim cDNA is intact in rit, the function of the domain where the timrit mutation occurs is still unknown. Our preliminary computer simulation indicates that the timrit mutation may lead to a local conformation change in secondary structure of TIM from coil to β sheet at the timrit mutation site (24a). Through such a change in conformation, the timrit mutation may alter a protein-protein interaction between TIM and PER. Since PER abundance is lowered in rit flies and the excess of PER rescues the rit phenotype, it is certain that the timrit mutation alters circadian rhythm by affecting PER abundance.

The peak levels of PER and TIM are lowered at 30°C when rit flies shows arrhythmicity or an extra long period of locomotor activity rhythm. Thus, lower levels and amplitudes of PER and TIM cycling correlate with behavioral phenotypes. Since TIM not only acts as a nuclear transporter of PER (44) but also influences PER stability (16, 32), the low level of PER in rit flies is probably caused by the low level of TIMrit. One question arising here is why PER and TIM show rhythmicity in abundance under LD but are basically arrhythmic under DD at 30°C. Null mutants of per and tim genes are arrhythmic at the mRNA and protein levels under both LD and DD (14, 16, 39). One possibility is that the rhythmicities of PER and TIM under LD at 30°C are partially driven by the light-dark cycle itself. Flies kept in LL phenocopy the tim01 mutant with regard to PER expression (32) because the abundance of TIM is rapidly reduced by light (16, 20, 27, 46). Since we confirmed that the level of TIMrit is reduced under constant-light conditions (25a), the response of TIM to light seems not to be affected by the timrit mutation. Another possibility is that rit affects the mode of PER, especially its accumulation in nuclei through altering PER phosphorylation, because we showed that PER is hypophosphorylated in rit at 30°C. Interestingly, an amorphic allele of the dbt gene, dbtP, shows the rit phenotype that mRNAs and protein levels of per and tim fluctuate in a nearly normal manner in LD but not in DD (31). DBT is a protein closely related to human casein kinase Iɛ (17), phosphorylating PER, and this phosphorylation is a key step of circadian fluctuation of PER abundance (31). The dbt locus on the third chromosome is intact in rit flies because the chromosome was changed to wild type in rit. Although little is known about the molecular link between tim and dbt except that the level of tim mRNA decreased prior to reduction of TIM abundance in dbtP under DD (31) and that PER phosphorylation is absent in tim01 (31), our result suggests that TIM and DBT likely cooperate to phosphorylate PER.

If the sole function of TIM is to stabilize PER and to transport PER into the nuclei, our results for timrit cannot be explained with certainty. For example, if we think that arrhythmicity at higher temperature in rit flies is caused by a defect in the interaction between TIMrit and PER, we cannot explain how the additional per+ dosage resulted in the complete recovery of arrhythmicity, except by assuming that PER alone could enter nuclei. Also it is hard to explain why PER and TIM levels in these flies increased even more than in the wild-type flies. These considerations lead us to assume that TIM has some additional role other than binding to PER. So and Rosbash (42) suggested that a posttranscriptional regulation step is involved in per mRNA oscillations. Available data do not support the view that TIM can bind to RNA, but one attractive hypothesis is that TIM is involved in the stability of per mRNA. Then TIMrit may destabilize per mRNA in a temperature-dependent manner, thus lowering the PER level.

The effect of rit on per and tim transcriptional levels appears to be more severe in per than in tim. The peak level of per mRNA in rit flies decreases to 60 to 70% of that in wild-type flies at both 24 and 30°C. Since the timrit mutation probably affects the per feedback loop at a posttranscriptional level, the alteration of per mRNA levels should be induced through the per feedback loop. Recently, two Drosophila genes, Jrk (dClk) and cyc (dBMAL), were identified as transcriptional activators of per and tim genes (1, 6, 36). These genes are intact in rit because they are mapped on the third chromosome, which was changed to the wild-type chromosome in the rit strain. It is believed that per and tim transcriptions are regulated in a similar way through the regulatory element called the E box encompassing the per and tim promoters (6). However, our present results suggest that there are separate transcriptional regulations for per and for tim. Thus, we suspect that TIMrit alters per transcription through interacting with Jrk, cyc, or other transcription factors which have not been identified, although the mode of protein-protein interaction among products of those clock genes is still unknown. Another possibility is that TIMrit destabilizes the per mRNA through posttranscriptional regulation. Posttranscriptional regulation in per mRNA was reported by So and Rosbash (42), although they provided no evidence that TIM influences such regulation either in a direct or an indirect way.

We showed here that the excess of per+ gene dosage ameliorates the temperature dependency not only of period in a behavior rhythm but also of abundances of PER and TIM and the amplitudes of their cyclings. This finding suggests that PER abundance is an important factor in the temperature compensation mechanism. However, because the period of per/+ flies, in which per+ gene dosage should be half as much as in wild-type flies, is well temperature compensated (24a), it would be hard to say that the reduced PER level alone in rit directly reflects its abnormal temperature compensation of period. As PER acts in the nucleus rather than in the cytoplasm, it is essential to compare the amounts of PER in nuclei between wild-type and rit flies. Our histological study using anti-PER antibody and the per-lacZ reporter gene showed that the abundance of PER expressed in LNs was lowered in rit flies and the number of LNs in which PER enters varies among rit flies at 30°C. The nuclear entry of PER probably delays in its timing and/or does not occur in a part of LNs in rit flies. This phenotype can be rescued in +/w+Y; rit. Taken together, the key feature of the temperature compensation of period may be the amount of PER transported in nuclei by TIM. Furthermore, because the nuclear localization of PER and protein cyclings of PER and TIM are rescued only by the increasing per+ gene dosage at 30°C, the ability of the nuclear transportation is virtually normal in TIMrit. The timrit mutation may first affect the interaction between PER and TIM and then disrupt their nuclear localization. Previous reports indicated that the per gene dosage negatively correlates with period length (4, 41). Additionally, Curtin et al. (5) reported that PER accumulates in the cytoplasm for several hours before entering nuclei in LNs and that the nuclear entry of PER is temperature sensitive in the perL mutant whose mutation occurs in the PAS domain, where PER interacts with TIM. It could be concluded that the temperature-dependent lengthening or abolishment of period by timrit is presumably induced as follows: timrit affects the interaction between TIMrit and PER, thereby decreasing the levels of PER and disrupting its nuclear localization. The low abundance of PER in nuclei makes it possible to interpret the long period of rit mutants based on the negative correlation with a gene dosage of per. Arrhythmicity observed in locomotor rhythm under DD might be induced by no or very little entering of PER into nuclei. This result is inconsistent with the fact that circadian locomotor rhythmicity can be rescued only if a very few cells in the restricted nervous system of a brain express the per gene (9, 10), because most of the rit flies lost the circadian rhythmicity of their locomotor activities while half of the nuclei in LNs seemed to be stained even at 30°C in many rit flies. One possible explanation is that the long or arrhythmic phenotype is caused by weak coupling among circadian oscillators in LNs.

In Neurospora, frq-9, an allele of the frequency gene, was isolated as a temperature compensation mutant whose Q10 is about 2 (24). At a molecular level, it was reported that two initiation codons of the frq gene are selectively used at different temperatures (11), and a temperature-dependent threshold level of FRQ is required to establish the feedback loop comprising the oscillator (23). Although the possibility that alternative methionines are used as an initiation site in the tim gene has been proposed (29, 33), such regulation has not yet been reported in Drosophila clock genes. However, it is significant that there is a critical temperature at which the lengthening effect is much more severe in rit. The effect is not so drastic below 24°C, but a drastic change in period is observed above 24°C (Fig. 1C). Furthermore, half a gene dose of per+ was enough to rescue the rit phenotype at low temperatures. It is thus possible that there is a threshold level of PER required to establish the clock mechanism in a temperature-dependent manner.

One further issue to examine is whether transformant flies carrying the timrit point mutation mimic the rit phenotype in the tim01 background. Such analyses have been done in studies on the perS mutation site (2, 34). Another issue is whether the PER-TIM interaction is affected in timrit as a function of temperature. We believe that these studies should give insights into the still mysterious molecular mechanism of temperature compensation of circadian rhythms.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Paul Hardin for use of his laboratory to perform RNase protection assays and for comments on the manuscript. We thank Michael Rosbash for the per-lacZ strain, Joan Rutila for the rh-per strain, Jeffrey C. Hall for per mutants, and Michael W. Young for tim mutants. Ralf Stanewsky and Justin Blau kindly provided anti-PER and anti-TIM antibodies, respectively. Flies for mating procedures and two strains carrying a tim duplication were provided by the Bloomington stock center, Bowling Green stock center, and Umeå stock center. We also thank Dave Allen, Lisa Lyons, and the staff of our lab for the technical support and advice, as well as HaiPing Hao, Jan Qiu, J. C. Hall, and M. W. Young for comments on the manuscript. A.M. thanks Ayako Shigenaga and Yoshitaka Kobayakawa for discussion and continuous encouragement.

This work was supported by a grant-in-aid from the Nakayama Science Foundation and grants from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan to A.M. and T.T. and by an HFSP grant to T.T.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Allada R, White N E, So W V, Hall J C, Rosbash M. A mutant Drosophila homolog of mammalian Clock disrupts circadian rhythms and transcription of period and timeless. Cell. 1998;93:791–804. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81440-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Baylies M K, Vosshall L B, Sehgal A, Young M W. New short period mutations of the Drosophila clock gene per. Neuron. 1992;9:575–581. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(92)90194-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cooper M K, Hamblen-Coyle M J, Liu X, Rutila J E, Hall J C. Dosage compensation of the period gene in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1994;138:721–732. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.3.721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cote G G, Brody S. Circadian rhythms in Drosophila melanogaster: analysis of period as a function of gene dosage at the per (period) locus. J Theor Biol. 1986;121:487–503. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(86)80104-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Curtin K D, Huang Z J, Rosbash M. Temporally regulated nuclear entry of the Drosophila period protein contributes to the circadian clock. Neuron. 1995;14:365–372. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(95)90292-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Darlington T K, Wager-Smith K, Ceriani M F, Staknis D, Gekakis N, Steeves T D L, Weitz C J, Takahashi J S, Kay S A. Closing the circadian loop: CLOCK-induced transcription of its own inhibitors per and tim. Science. 1998;280:1599–1603. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5369.1599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Edery I, Zwiebel L J, Dembinska M E, Rosbash M. Temporal phosphorylation of the Drosophila period protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91:2260–2264. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.6.2260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ewer J, Hamblen-Coyle M, Rosbash M, Hall J C. Requirement for period gene expression in the adult and not during development for locomotor activity rhythms of imaginal Drosophila melanogaster. J Neurogenet. 1990;7:31–73. doi: 10.3109/01677069009084151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ewer J, Frish B, Hamblen-Coyle M J, Rosbash M, Hall J C. Expression of the period clock gene within different cell types in the brain of Drosophila adults and mosaic analysis of these cells’ influence on circadian behavioral rhythms. J Neurosci. 1992;12:3321–3349. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.12-09-03321.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Frish B, Hardin P E, Hamblen-Coyle M J, Rosbash M, Hall J C. A promoterless period gene mediates behavioral rhythmicity and cyclical per expression in a restricted subset of the Drosophila nervous system. Neuron. 1994;12:555–570. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(94)90212-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Garceau N Y, Liu Y, Loros J L, Dunlap J C. Alternative initiation of translation and time-specific phosphorylation yield multiple forms of the essential clock protein FREQUENCY. Cell. 1997;89:469–476. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80227-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gekakis N, Saez L, Delahaye-Brown A M, Myers M P, Sehgal A, Young M W, Weitz C J. Isolation of timeless by PER protein interaction: defective interaction between timeless protein and long-period mutant PERL. Science. 1995;270:811–815. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5237.811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hall J C. Circadian pacemakers blowing hot and cold—but they’re clocks, not thermometers. Cell. 1997;90:9–12. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80308-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hardin P E, Hall J C, Rosbash M. Feedback of the Drosophila period gene product on circadian cycling of its messenger RNA levels. Nature. 1990;343:536–540. doi: 10.1038/343536a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Huang Z J, Curtin K D, Rosbash M. PER protein interactions and temperature compensation of a circadian clock in Drosophila. Science. 1995;267:1169–1172. doi: 10.1126/science.7855598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hunter-Ensor M, Ousley A, Sehgal A. Regulation of the Drosophila protein timeless suggests a mechanism for resetting the circadian clock by light. Cell. 1996;84:677–685. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81046-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kloss B, Price J K, Saez L, Blau J, Rothenfluh A, Wesley C S, Young M W. The Drosophila clock gene double-time encodes a protein closely related to human casein kinase Iɛ. Cell. 1998;94:97–107. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81225-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Konopka R J, Pittendrigh C, Orr D. Reciprocal behaviour associated with altered homeostasis and photosensitivity of Drosophila clock mutants. J Neurogenet. 1989;6:1–10. doi: 10.3109/01677068909107096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Konopka R J, Hamblen-Coyle M J, Jamison C F, Hall J C. An ultrashort clock mutation at the period locus of Drosophila melanogaster that reveals some new features of the fly’s circadian system. J Biol Rhythms. 1994;9:3–4. doi: 10.1177/074873049400900303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lee C, Parikh V, Itsukaichi T, Bae K, Edery I. Resetting the Drosophila clock by photic regulation of PER and a PER-TIM complex. Science. 1996;271:1740–1744. doi: 10.1126/science.271.5256.1740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lindsley D L, Zimm G G. The genome of Drosophila melanogaster. London, England: Academic Press; 1992. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Liu X, Lorenz L, Yu Q, Hall J C, Rosbash M. Spatial and temporal expression of the period gene in Drosophila melanogaster. Genes Dev. 1988;2:228–238. doi: 10.1101/gad.2.2.228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Liu Y, Garceau N Y, Loros J L, Dunlap J C. Thermally regulated translational control of FRQ mediates aspects of temperature responses in the Neurospora circadian clock. Cell. 1997;89:477–486. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80228-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Loros J J, Feldman J F. Loss of temperature compensation of circadian period length in the frq-9 mutant of Neurospora crassa. J Biol Rhythms. 1986;1:187–198. doi: 10.1177/074873048600100302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24a.Matsumoto, A. Unpublished data.
  • 25.Matsumoto A, Motoshige T, Murata T, Tomioka K, Tanimura T, Chiba Y. Chronobiological analysis of a new clock mutant, Toki, in Drosophila melanogaster. J Neurogenet. 1994;9:141–155. doi: 10.3109/01677069409167276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25a.Matsumoto, A., and T. Tanimura. Unpublished data.
  • 26.Murata T, Matsumoto A, Tomioka K, Chiba Y. Ritsu: a rhythm mutant from a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster. J Neurogenet. 1995;9:239–249. doi: 10.3109/01677069509084160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Myers M P, Wager-Smith K, Rothenfluh-Hilfiker A, Young M W. Light-induced degradation of TIMELESS and entrainment of the Drosophila circadian clock. Science. 1996;271:1736–1740. doi: 10.1126/science.271.5256.1736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Myers M P, Wager-Smith K, Wesley C S, Young M W, Sehgal A. Positional cloning and sequence analysis of the Drosophila clock gene, timeless. Science. 1995;270:805–808. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5237.805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Myers M P, Rothenfluh A, Chang M, Young M W. Comparison of chromosomal DNA composing timeless in Drosophila melanogaster and D. virilis suggests a new conserved structure for the TIMELESS protein. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:4710–4714. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.23.4710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ousley A, Zafarullah K, Chen Y, Emerson M, Hickman L, Sehgal A. Conserved region of timeless (tim) clock gene in Drosophila analyzed through phylogenetic and functional studies. Genetics. 1998;148:815–825. doi: 10.1093/genetics/148.2.815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Price J L, Blau J, Rothenfluh A, Abodeely M, Kloss B, Young M W. double-time is a novel Drosophila clock gene that regulates PERIOD protein accumulation. Cell. 1998;94:83–95. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81224-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Price J L, Dembinska M E, Young M W, Rosbash M. Suppression of PERIOD protein abundance and circadian cycling by the Drosophila clock mutation timeless. EMBO J. 1995;14:4044–4049. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb00075.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Rosato E, Trevisan A, Sandrelli F, Zordan M, Kyriacou C P, Costa R. Conceptual translation of timeless reveals alternative initiating methionines in Drosophila. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:455–457. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.3.455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Rutila J E, Edery I, Hall J C, Rosbash M. The analysis of new short-period circadian rhythm mutants suggests features of D. melanogaster period gene function. J Neurogenet. 1992;8:101–113. doi: 10.3109/01677069209084155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Rutila J E, Zeng H, Le M, Curtin K D, Hall J C, Rosbash M. The timSL mutant of the Drosophila rhythm gene timeless manifests allele-specific interactions with period gene mutants. Neuron. 1996;17:921–929. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80223-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Rutila J E, Suri V, Le M, So W V, Rosbash M, Hall J C. CYCLE is a second bHLH-PAS clock protein essential for circadian rhythmicity and transcription of Drosophila period and timeless. Cell. 1998;93:805–814. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81441-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Saez L, Young M W. Regulation of nuclear entry of the Drosophila clock proteins Period and Timeless. Neuron. 1996;17:911–920. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80222-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sawyer L A, Hennessy J M, Peixoto A A, Rosato E, Parkinson H, Costa R, Kyriacou C P. Natural variation in Drosophila clock gene and temperature compensation. Science. 1997;278:2117–2120. doi: 10.1126/science.278.5346.2117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sehgal A, Rothenfluh-Hilfiker A, Hunter-Ensor M, Chen Y, Myers M P, Young M W. Rhythmic expression of timeless: a basis for promoting circadian cycles in period gene autoregulation. Science. 1995;270:808–810. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5237.808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sehgal A. Molecular genetic analysis of circadian rhythms in vertebrates and invertebrates. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1996;5:824–831. doi: 10.1016/0959-4388(95)80112-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Smith R F, Konopka R J. Effects of dosage alterations at the per locus on the period of the circadian clock of Drosophila. Mol Gen Genet. 1982;185:30–36. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.So W V, Rosbash M. Post-transcriptional regulation contributes to Drosophila clock gene mRNA cycling. EMBO J. 1997;16:7146–7155. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.23.7146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Sokolove P G, Bushell W N. The chi square periodogram: its utility for analysis of circadian rhythms. J Theor Biol. 1978;72:131–160. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(78)90022-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Vosshall L B, Price J L, Sehgal A, Saez L, Young M W. Block in nuclear localization of period protein by a second clock mutation, timeless. Science. 1994;263:1606–1609. doi: 10.1126/science.8128247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zeng H, Hardin P E, Rosbash M. Constitutive overexpression of the Drosophila period protein inhibits period mRNA cycling. EMBO J. 1994;13:3590–3598. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06666.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Zeng H, Qian Z, Myers M P, Rosbash M. A light-entrainment mechanism for the Drosophila circadian clock. Nature. 1996;380:129–135. doi: 10.1038/380129a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES