Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pain. 2023 Apr 27;164(9):2070–2083. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002909

Table 4.

Regression Models of Pelvic Pain Outcome for Summed Z-Score Sensory Testing Composites.

Year Parameter b SE β ηp2 SS MSE F p
1 Intercept 16.3 1.2 0.58 37298 194 191.9 < .001
Baseline Pelvic Pain 0.5 0.1 0.51 0.20 6641 34.2 < .001
QST 0.1 0.1 0.10 0.01 318 1.6 0.20
Bladder Test 0.3 0.2 0.11 0.01 286 1.5 0.23
Audio/Visual 0.2 0.5 0.03 0.00 37 0.2 0.66
2 Intercept 14.2 1.2 0.52 25407 186 135.8 < .001
Baseline Pelvic Pain 0.2 0.1 0.26 0.05 1171 6.3 0.01
QST 0.1 0.1 0.10 0.01 209 1.1 0.29
Bladder Test 0.4 0.2 0.19 0.02 546 2.9 0.09
Audio/Visual 0.2 0.5 0.03 0.00 23 0.1 0.72
3 Intercept 12.8 1.3 0.51 15380 160 95.2 < .001
Baseline Pelvic Pain 0.2 0.1 0.27 0.06 907 5.6 0.02
QST 0.2 0.1 0.17 0.03 493 3.0 0.08
Bladder Test 0.5 0.2 0.26 0.05 762 4.7 0.03
Audio/Visual −0.6 0.5 −0.10 0.01 187 1.2 0.29
4 Intercept 11.7 1.2 0.52 11317 127 89.4 < .001
Baseline Pelvic Pain 0.1 0.1 0.10 0.01 65 0.5 0.48
QST 0.3 0.1 0.27 0.07 801 6.3 0.01
Bladder Test 0.4 0.3 0.21 0.02 262 2.1 0.15
Audio/Visual 0.3 0.5 0.06 0.00 43 0.3 0.56

Note. The df for each model were: Year 1 (1, 138), Year 2 (1, 124), Year 3 (1, 92), and Year 4 (1, 82).