Abstract
Purpose of review
This review briefly summarizes the significant impact of thromboinflammation in sickle cell disease in relation to recent advances in biomarkers that are used in functional microfluidic assays.
Recent findings
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is an inherited hemoglobinopathy that affects 100 000 Americans and millions worldwide. Patients with SCD exhibit chronic haemolysis, chronic inflammation and thrombosis, and vaso-occlusion, triggering various clinical complications, including organ damage and increased mortality and morbidity. Recent advances in functional microfluidic assays provide direct biomarkers of disease, including abnormal white blood cell and red blood cell adhesion, cell aggregation, endothelial degradation and contraction, and thrombus formation.
Summary
Novel and emerging functional microfluidic assays are a promising and feasible strategy to comprehensively characterize thromboinflammatory reactions in SCD, which can be used for personalized risk assessment and tailored therapeutic decisions.
Keywords: cell adhesion, endothelial cells, functional biomarkers, leukocytes, microfluidic assays, platelets, sickle cell disease, thromboinflammation, thrombus formation
INTRODUCTION
Inherited haemoglobin (Hb) disorders are carried by nearly 7% of the world’s population, with most structural Hb variants having the recessive b-globin gene mutations, βS or S and βC or C [1–3]. Sickle cell disease (SCD) arises when these mutations are inherited homozygously (Hb SS or SCD-SS) or paired with another b-globin gene mutation, such as Hb C (Hb SC or SCD-SC). Chronic inflammatory processes, haemostatic alterations and thrombotic events are common in SCD [4,5]. Under hypoxic conditions, HbS polymerizes in red blood cells (RBCs) and provokes a complex pathophysiology of acute and chronic organ damage [5,6]. Sickle RBCs exhibit reduced deformability [7–10], increased adhesion to the endothelium [9,11–15], and are prone to haemolysis, which contributes to endothelial inflammation and coagulation activation [4]. This complex crosstalk between thrombosis and vascular inflammation, termed thromboinflammation, ultimately plays a significant role in major complications of SCD, including venous thromboembolism (VTE), vaso-occlusion, ischemia-reperfusion and chronic organ damage, resulting in increased morbidity, healthcare utilization and reduced life expectancy [16,17,18■■]. Understanding the heterogeneity of pathogenic thromboinflammatory responses in SCD may assist in providing timely, tailored therapeutic interventions to patients with SCD [18■■,19,20]. However, the crosstalk between thrombosis and vascular inflammation in SCD has not been thoroughly characterized and predictive biomarkers of disease severity and response to therapies remain under-developed [21].
To date, studies of thromboinflammatory responses in SCD have either utilized animal models or in-vitro assays. The main limitations of available in-vitro assays include among others the lack of components of the microcirculation such as endothelial cells and the inability to precisely regulate the oxygen content or shear stress, which can directly impact sickle RBC behaviour. Therefore, a comprehensive assessment of how cellular, plasma-derived and vessel wall components contribute to the thromboinflammatory milieu in SCD cannot be thoroughly captured.
ENDOTHELIAL ACTIVATION AND INFLAMMATION IN SICKLE CELL DISEASE
The pathophysiologic mechanisms in SCD have been extensively reviewed in prior publications [4,22,23], but we would like to draw attention to the concept that proinflammatory and prothrombotic signals reciprocally activate each other to promote vascular damage, vaso-occlusion and end-organ damage. During intravascular haemolysis, SCD RBCs release damage-associated molecular patterns, including free heme and heme-laden red blood cell-derived extracellular vesicles (REVs), which activate endothelial cells through Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) and initiate the translocation of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) from the cytoplasm to the nucleus, wherein it induces the transcription of genes for adhesion molecules [24,25] (Fig. 1). As a result, endothelial expression of vascular cell adhesion protein 1 (VCAM-1) [26,27] and intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) [28,29] is significantly enhanced, an event that propagates platelet capture, SCD RBC and leukocyte firm adhesion. These adhered leukocytes release free radical species that inactivate nitric oxide, a homeostatic mediator that reduces platelet activation and thrombosis and restricts endothelin-1 and VCAM-1 overexpression [30]. Recruited neutrophils also engage in heterotypic cell interactions with platelets, which were previously shown to contribute to vascular thrombosis in SCD [31]. Release of SCD REVs can activate the intrinsic pathway of coagulation in a mechanism that is partially dependent on FXI, and is associated with elevated plasma levels of prothrombin fragment 1·2 and D-dimer [32–35]. In murine models of SCD, leukocytes expressed significantly higher levels of tissue factor (TF) and had increased TF activity compared with control (AA) mice [36]. Systemic inhibition of TF reduced inflammatory cytokine and myeloperoxidase levels in the lungs of treated SCD mice, and attenuated endothelial cell injury as demonstrated by reduced plasma levels of IL-6, serum amyloid P and soluble VCAM-1. In contrast, endothelial cell specific deletion of TF had no effect on coagulation but selectively attenuated plasma levels of IL-6 injury in SCD. In murine studies of SCD vaso-occlusive crisis, thrombin activation of protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR-1) on endothelial cells contributed to lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced pulmonary vaso-occlusion mediated by arteriolar neutrophil-platelet microthrombi [35]. In our preliminary studies, REV-treated endothelial cells expressed higher levels of von Willebrand factor (vWF) and enhanced formation of vWF multimers, which have been shown to mediate sickle RBC and platelet recruitment (Fig. 1) [37]. The above processes support that several proinflammatory and prothrombotic mediators have distinct contributions to activation of coagulation, vascular inflammation and endothelial cell injury in SCD.
FIGURE 1.

Overview of thromboinflammation in sickle cell disease.
EXISTING MICROFLUIDIC ASSAYS FOR ASSESSING ABNORMAL CELLULAR ADHESION IN SICKLE CELL DISEASE
Red blood cell [38] and white blood cell (WBC) [39] adhesion to the endothelium can be used as biomarkers of microvascular inflammation [40,41], and likely contribute to SCD pathogenesis [15,42–46]. Sickling-dependent damage of the RBC membrane promotes the expression of molecules that are either not expressed in healthy RBCs [e.g. very late activation antigen-4 (VLA-4)], or are physiologically shielded from the cell surface, including negatively charged phosphatidylserine, CD36, intercellular adhesion molecule-4 (ICAM-4) and basal cell adhesion molecule and Lutheran blood group (BCAM/LU) [47–55]. Early studies of ex-vivo blood cell adhesion relied on open systems under static conditions and parallel plate flow chambers [56]. Flow cytometry of aberrant surface molecule expression or activation has served as a surrogate to directly measure abnormal cell adhesion in individuals with SCD [57–59], but quantitative changes in surface molecules (e.g. BCAM/LU) do not always faithfully recapitulate changes in cell adhesive properties [51,60]. Key clinical and experimental studies employing flow chambers or ex-vivo rat mesocecum [11,12,61,62] have shown that sickle red cell and WBC adhesion [39], plausibly contribute to the pathogenesis of vascular occlusion [15,42,43,61] and may correlate with disease severity [38,46,63]. However, few measurements of blood cell adhesion in SCD at baseline and with therapy have been reported, and none of these studies were conducted under pathologically relevant conditions (i.e. hypoxia, activation of endothelium) [12,25,29].
To address these unmet needs, our laboratory has focused on the development and utilization of microfluidic technologies such as the SCD-BioChip, which is integrated with a micro-gas exchanger, biomolecular probes, laminated endothelium, high-throughput microscopic imaging and data analysis methods to study blood-endothelium interactions and adhesion dynamics under both normoxic and hypoxic conditions (Fig. 2a,b). We have focused on standardizing these microfluidic assays to measure abnormal blood cell adhesion in whole blood samples and have uncovered significant associations with clinical phenotypes and response to treatment in SCD [56,64–73].
FIGURE 2.

Functional microfluidic assay for assessing cellular adhesion and endothelial activation. (a) SCD-BioChip microfluidic chips are manufactured using glass slides, double-side adhesive and polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), containing three parallel microchannels of 50 μm height. The outlet tubing has the option to be connected to a micro-gas exchanger demonstrated in (b). The micro-gas exchanger is composed of an outer gas impermeable tubing and an inner gas permeable tubing enabling controllable gas exchange. The SCD-BioChip assay is versatile allowing quantitative assessment of endothelial cell contraction, blood cell interactions with endothelial cells, cell adhesion to adhesion molecules (i.e. P-selectin, E-selectin, ICAM-1, VCAM-1) and extracellular matrix proteins (i.e. laminin and fibronectin). (c) Thrombin-mediated endothelial contraction (scale bar represents 100 μm). (d) RBC adhesion on REV-activated endothelium (scale bar represents 100 μm). (e) Adhesion of purified peripheral neutrophils on E-selectin coated microchannels (scale bar represents 50 μm).
Utilizing our SCD-BioChip assays (Fig. 2a), we demonstrated that adhesion profiles of SCD RBCs on laminin-coated microfluidic surfaces capture patient clinical Hb composition, wherein patients with SCD (HbSS) demonstrated higher adhesion profiles compared with patients with HbSC, beta-thalassemia and healthy donors (HbAA) [64]. Moreover, we incorporated a micro-gas exchanger (Fig. 2b) and demonstrated that SCD RBC adhesion profiles to laminin and fibronectin were significantly increased under hypoxia compared with normoxia [66]. Further analysis identified a unique patient sub-population whose RBCs showed maximal adhesion to laminin and fibronectin in response to hypoxia, which in turn correlated with a more severe clinical SCD phenotype [66]. Using ICAM-1 laminated in microchannels, we found that RBC-ICAM-1 interactions were mediated by fibrinogen bound to the RBC membrane [68]. Specifically, SCD RBCs exhibited rolling adhesion and firm attachment to ICAM-1 at highershearstressover3000/s, and lower shear stress below 2000/s, respectively. In separate studies, we demonstrated that SCD RBC adhesion on heme-activated endothelialized microfluidic channels varied amongst individual patients and was associated with biomarkers of haemolysis and inflammation, age and a recent history of transfusion [67]. In another study, we showed the in-vitro efficacy of an FDA-approved Syk tyrosine kinase inhibitor for chronic myeloid leukaemia (Imatinib) in blocking Band 3 tyrosine phosphorylation on SCD RBCs and reducing RBC adhesion to heme-activated human pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells under combined hypoxia (83% SpO2) and controlled shear stress (1dyne/cm2) [74]. Thrombin activation of endothelial cells interferes with their barrier function, promotes cell contraction and leads to increased expression of ICAM-1, VCAM-1 and vWF, which results in circulating SCD RBC capture and firm adhesion (Fig. 2c). An endogenous serine protease inhibitor, antithrombin-III (AT-III), capable of inhibiting several enzymes in the coagulation cascade, including thrombin, was demonstrated to mitigate the endothelial cell contraction and reduced surface expression of vWF and VCAM-1, downregulating SCD RBC adhesion [69,73]. Alternatively, SCD REV-treated microvascular endothelial cells demonstrated elevated levels of ICAM-1 [29] and vWF[65] compared with REVs derived from normal RBCs and these effects correlated with biomarkers of haemolysis and incidence of deep vein thrombosis [65]. Targeting vWF with its endogenous protease ADAMTS13 or neutralizing heme with hemopexin, each resulted in significant reduction of REV-mediated adhesion events [65].
Monocytes [75–78] and neutrophils [79–81] are increased in number, abnormally activated and associated with adverse outcomes in SCD [24,78,82–85]. Abnormal interactions between leukocytes and endothelial selectins (i.e. P-selectin and E-selectin) have been targeted in vitro and in vivo with antibodies and small molecules [70,71,86–89], and have been the focus of Phase II and III clinical studies in SCD. In our previous work, heterogeneous leukocyte adhesion was observed in P-selectin coated microchannels, and these adhesion events were inhibited dose-dependently following pretreatment with Crizanlizumab (ADAKVEO; Novartis International AG) [70,90]. In addition, we demonstrated that pretreating whole blood with Crizanlizumab attenuated leukocyte rolling but did not affect firmly adhesion of cells. When we used E-selectin coated microfluidic channels, we found that neutrophils from SCD individuals exhibited significantly higher adhesion under normoxic and hypoxic conditions compared with neutrophils from healthy AA donors (Fig. 2e). Similarly, inhibiting E-selectin with a blocking monoclonal CD62E antibody significantly reduced endothelial adhesion of neutrophils from patients with SCD.
Together, these results demonstrate that microfluidic assessment of abnormal blood cell adhesion on sub-endothelial matrices, endothelial adhesive molecules or on activated endothelium, is a powerful approach to diagnose and quantitate abnormalities in cell activation state and for assessing the therapeutic efficacy of disease modifying therapies targeting blood cells. In addition, we anticipate that blood cell adhesion on endothelial cells preactivated with patient blood components, such as plasma or circulating extracellular vesicles, can be used as a functional biomarker of vascular inflammation for individual patients with SCD.
EMERGING THROMBUS FORMATION ASSAYS FOR ASSESSING THROMBOSIS IN SICKLE CELL DISEASE
Thrombin generation assays and thromboelastometry have demonstrated that patients with SCD exhibit increased levels of thrombin-antithrombin complexes, D-dimer, prothrombin fragment 1.2, factor VII and fibrinogen [32,91–94]. However, these assays lack key components, cellular fractions or endothelial cells that are known to contribute to fibrin deposition and the structure, properties and dynamics of sickle thrombus formation [95■,96]. Further, current thrombus formation assays lack the capability of conducting tests under hypoxia, which was previously shown to augment endothelial cell TF expression and promote thrombosis in SCD [96,97] among other mechanisms.
Using the SCD-BioChip technology laminated with E-selectin, we found that hypoxia leads to the formation of large RBC aggregates, specifically in SCD individuals with lower baseline haemoglobin content and higher LDH levels. Importantly, this subgroup of SCD patients exhibited reduced neutrophil adhesion to E-selectin, suggesting that the degree of neutrophil activation in SCD is inversely proportional to leukocyte L-selectin expression (manuscript under review). Ongoing studies will focus on the diagnostic utility of this assay in steady-state SCD [71,98–100].
Recently, we have developed a functional microfluidic assay for the quantitative and dynamic measurement of thrombus formation using combined particle image velocimetry (PIV) and wavelet-based optical flow velocimetry (wOFV) [72]. This thrombus formation assay was tested using citrate-anti-coagulated whole blood supplemented with 100mmol/l CaCl2. Whole blood flow was introduced using a constant pressure pump. Higher degree of coagulation represented by increased thrombus formation within microchannels altered the blood flow resistance, which can be visualized and quantitated by measuring local flow velocity field alterations under the provided constant pressure. Both PIV and wOFV were utilized to analyse microscopic images of whole blood flow in a microchannel during coagulation. PIV was used to compute the average velocity over the entire image domain, while wOFV was used because it provides orders of magnitude higher spatial resolution and is well suited at determining RBC velocity from captured images of whole blood (Fig. 3a–f) [72].
FIGURE 3.

Thrombus formation microfluidic assay [72]. (a) Photo of microfluidic channel with formed thrombus. (b) Temporal evolution of the horizontal component of velocity along the flow channel is used for quantification of the thrombus formation process including kinetic rate of thrombus formation and percentage of occlusive thrombus within the entire microchannel. (c, e) Representative microscopic images at 230 and 380 s during a thrombus formation assay. (d, f) Wavelet-based optical flow velocimetry (wOFV) determines the velocity field from blood flow streamlines. Higher blood flow velocity is indicated by the bright yellow velocity field and streamlines are shown in green. Blood coagulation is induced by recalcification of whole blood with 100 mmol/l CaCl2. As a thrombus is formed, the blood flow velocity field changes significantly from the 230 to 380 s timepoint.
CONCLUSION
Experimental evidence is mounting that a complex crosstalk between inflammatory and thrombotic pathways become operative in SCD and is critical for major clinical manifestations of SCD, including stroke, venous thromboembolism, acute chest syndromeand ischemia-reperfusion injury [20]. Despite our improved understanding of pathophysiologic mechanisms in SCD, there are persistent challenges in the diagnostic assessment and management of SCD patients that relate to the inherent heterogeneity of the disease, the lack of reliable biomarkers of disease severity and thrombotic risk, and the lack of in-vitro diagnostics that comprehensively capture thromboinflammatory events ex vivo [18■■,20]. As a result, future studies in the SCD field should also include the development of clinical microfluidic technologies for the assessment of heterotypic cell–cell interactions, thromboinflammation, organ-on-chip applications and in-vitro preclinical drug screening endeavours.
KEY POINTS.
The complex crosstalk between inflammation and thrombosis (thromboinflammation) is incompletely understood in SCD, in part due to lack of available biomarkers of disease and because of limited diagnostic tools.
Recent advances in functional microfluidics can capture changes in white blood cell and red blood cell adhesion, cell aggregation, endothelial degradation and contraction, and thrombus formation for comprehensive assessment of microvascular thrombosis mechanisms in SCD.
Future efforts should focus on the refinement and optimization of microfluidic tools to better define the functional components of thromboinflammatory processes across various diseases that will allow for individualized risk assessment and tailored therapeutic decisions.
Acknowledgements
R.A. and U.A.G. conceived and planned the organization of the review. R.A. searched and collected literature. R.A. and U.A.G. discussed the structure and contents of the manuscript. R.A. created the figures and drafted the manuscript. R.A. and U.A.G. reviewed and edited the manuscript.
Financial support and sponsorship
This work is supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) R01HL133574 (UAG), OT2HL152643 (UAG), R42HL160384 (UAG) and T32HL134622 (RA). The contents of this article are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Footnotes
Conflicts of interest
R.A., U.A.G. and Case Western Reserve University have financial interests in Hemex Health Inc. UAG and Case Western Reserve University have financial interests in BioChip Labs Inc. U.A.G. and Case Western Reserve University have financial interests in Xatek Inc. U.A.G. has financial interests in DxNow Inc. Financial interests include licensed intellectual property, stock ownership, research funding, employment and consulting. Hemex Health Inc. offers point-of-care diagnostics for haemoglobin disorders, anaemia and malaria. BioChip Labs Inc. offers commercial clinical microfluidic biomarker assays for inherited or acquired blood disorders. Xatek Inc. offers point-of-care global assays to evaluate the haemostatic process. DxNow Inc. offers microfluidic and bio-imaging technologies for in-vitro fertilization, forensics and diagnostics. Competing interests of Case Western Reserve University employees are overseen and managed by the Conflict of Interests Committee according to a Conflict-of-Interest Management Plan.
REFERENCES AND RECOMMENDED READING
Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:
■ of special interest
■■ of outstanding interest
- 1.Modell Bernadette and Darlison Matthew. Global epidemiology of haemoglobin disorders and derived service indicators. Bull World Health Organ 2008; 86:480–487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Jamison DT; World Bank, and Disease Control Priorities Project. Disease control priorities in developing countries. The World Bank and Oxford University Press: Oxford University Press; 2006. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Weatherall DJ, Clegg JB. Inherited haemoglobin disorders: an increasing global health problem. Bull World Health Organ 2001; 79:704–712. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kato GJ, Steinberg MH, Gladwin MT. Intravascular hemolysis and the pathophysiology of sickle cell disease. J Clin Invest 2017; 127:750–760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kato GJ, Piel FB, Reid CD, et al. Sickle cell disease. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2018; 18010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Vekilov PG. Sickle-cell haemoglobin polymerization: is it the primary pathogenic event of sickle-cell anaemia? Br J Haematol 2007; 139:173–184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Nash GB, Johnson CS, Meiselman HJ. Mechanical properties of oxygenated red blood cells in sickle cell (HbSS) disease. Blood 1984; 63:73–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Brandao MM, Fontes A, Barjas-Castro ML, et al. Optical tweezers for measuring red blood cell elasticity: application to the study of drug response in sickle cell disease. Eur J Haematol 2003; 70:207–211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mohandas N, Evans E. Sickle erythrocyte adherence to vascular endothelium. Morphologic correlates and the requirement for divalent cations and collagen-binding plasma proteins. J Clin Invest 1985; 76:1605–1612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Byun H, Hillman TR, Higgins JM, et al. Optical measurement of biomechanical properties of individual erythrocytes from a sickle cell patient. Acta Biomater 2012; 8:4130–4138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Montes RA, Eckman JR, Hsu LL, Wick TM. Sickle erythrocyte adherence to endothelium at low shear: role of shear stress in propagation of vaso-occlusion. Am J Hematol 2002; 70:216–227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hillery CA, Du MC, Montgomery RR, Scott JP. Increased adhesion of erythrocytes to components of the extracellular matrix: isolation and characterization of a red blood cell lipid that binds thrombospondin and laminin.. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kasschau MR, Barabino GA, Bridges KR, Golan DE. Adhesion of sickle neutrophils and erythrocytes to fibronectin. Blood 1996; 87:771–780. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bartolucci P, Brugnara C, Teixeira-Pinto A, et al. Erythrocyte density in sickle cell syndromes is associated with specific clinical manifestations and hemolysis. Blood 2012; 120:3136–3141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kaul DK, Finnegan E, Barabino GA. Sickle red cell-endothelium interactions. Microcirculation 2009; 16:97–111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ballas SK, Mohandas N. Sickle red cell microrheology and sickle blood rheology. Microcirculation 2004; 11:209–225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bunn HF. Pathogenesis and treatment of sickle cell disease. N Engl J Med 1997; 337:762–769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Conran N, De Paula EV. Thromboinflammatory mechanisms in sickle cell disease: challenging the hemostatic balance. Haematologica 2020; 105:2380–2390. ■■ This article provides a systematic review of current thrombosis assays, and provided insights and suggestion for future thrombosis assays.
- 19.Erich V, De Paula NC. Thrombotic manifestation of sickle cell disease in the spectrum of thromboinflammation. Haematologica 2020; 105:1–11. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Jackson SP, Darbousset R, Schoenwaelder SM. Thromboinflammation: challenges of therapeutically targeting coagulation and other host defense mechanisms. Blood 2019; 133:906–918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Romana M, Connes P, Key NS. Microparticles in sickle cell disease. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 2018; 68:319–329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Conran N, Belcher JD. Inflammation in sickle cell disease. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 2018; 68:263–299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gurkan UA. Biophysical and rheological biomarkers of red blood cell physiology and pathophysiology. Curr Opin Hematol 2021; 28:138–149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Belcher JD, Chen C, Nguyen J, et al. Heme triggers TLR4 signaling leading to endothelial cell activation and vaso-occlusion in murine sickle cell disease. Blood 2014; 123:377–390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Camus SM, De Moraes JA, Bonnin P, et al. Circulating cell membrane microparticles transfer heme to endothelial cells and trigger vasoocclusions in sickle cell disease. Blood 2015; 125:3805–3814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kaul DK, Tsai HM, Liu XD, et al. Monoclonal antibodies to alphaVbeta3 (7E3 and LM609) inhibit sickle red blood cell-endothelium interactions induced by platelet-activating factor. Blood 2000; 95:368–374. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Setty BN, Stuart MJ. Vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 is involved in mediating hypoxia-induced sickle red blood cell adherence to endothelium: potential role in sickle cell disease. Blood 1996; 88:2311–2320. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hines PC, Zen Q, Burney SN, et al. Novel epinephrine and cyclic AMP-mediated activation of BCAM/Lu-dependent sickle (SS) RBC adhesion. Blood 2003; 101:3281–3287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Garnier Y, Ferdinand S, Garnier M, et al. Plasma microparticles of sickle patients during crisis or taking hydroxyurea modify endothelium inflammatory properties. Blood 2020; 136:247–256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Daniel BKS, Mark TG. Nitric oxide pathology and therapeutics in sickle cell disease. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 2018; 68:223–237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Li J, Kim K, Hahm E, et al. Neutrophil AKT2 regulates heterotypic cell-cell interactions during vascular inflammation. J Clin Invest 2014; 124:1483–1496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.van Beers EJ, Schaap MC, Berckmans RJ, et al. Circulating erythrocyte-derived microparticles are associated with coagulation activation in sickle cell disease. Haematologica 2009; 94:1513–1519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Foley JH, Conway EM. Cross talk pathways between coagulation and inflammation. Circ Res 2016; 118:1392–1408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Sparkenbaugh E, Pawlinski R. Interplay between coagulation and vascular inflammation in sickle cell disease. Br J Haematol 2013; 162:3–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Sparkenbaugh EM, Chen C, Brzoska T, et al. Thrombin-mediated activation of PAR-1 contributes to microvascular stasis in mouse models of sickle cell disease. Blood 2020; 135:1783–1787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Chantrathammachart P, Mackman N, Sparkenbaugh E, et al. Tissue factor promotes activation of coagulation and inflammation in a mouse model of sickle cell disease. Blood 2012; 120:636–646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kawecki C, Lenting PJ, Denis CV. von Willebrand factor and inflammation. J Thromb Haemost 2017; 15:1285–1294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hebbel RP, Boogaerts MA, Eaton JW, Steinberg MH. Erythrocyte adherence to endothelium in sickle-cell anemia. A possible determinant of disease severity. N Engl J Med 1980; 302:992–995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Turhan A, Weiss LA, Mohandas N, et al. Primary role for adherent leukocytes in sickle cell vascular occlusion: a new paradigm. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002; 99:3047–3051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Camus SM, Gausseres B, Bonnin P, et al. Erythrocyte microparticles can induce kidney vaso-occlusions in a murine model of sickle cell disease. Blood 2012; 120:5050–5058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Jana S, Strader MB, Meng F, et al. Hemoglobin oxidation–dependent reactions promote interactions with band 3 and oxidative changes in sickle cell–derived microparticles. JCI Insight 2018; 3:. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Matsui NM, Varki A, Embury SH. Heparin inhibits the flow adhesion of sickle red blood cells to P-selectin. Blood 2002; 100:3790–3796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Matsui NM, Borsig L, Rosen SD, et al. P-selectin mediates the adhesion of sickle erythrocytes to the endothelium. Blood 2001; 98:1955–1962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Lim MY, Ataga KI, Key NS. Hemostatic abnormalities in sickle cell disease. Curr Opin Hematol 2013; 20:472–477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Hebbel RP. Adhesive interactions of sickle erythrocytes with endothelium. J Clin Invest 1997; 100(11 Suppl):S83–S86. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ballas SK, Smith ED. Red blood cell changes during the evolution of the sickle cell painful crisis. Blood 1992; 79:2154–2163. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Sugihara K, Sugihara T, Mohandas N, et al. Thrombospondin mediates adherence of CD36þsickle reticulocytes to endothelial cells. Blood 1992; 80:2634–2642. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Telen MJ. Erythrocyte adhesion receptors: blood group antigens and related molecules. Transfus Med Rev 2005; 19:32–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.El Nemer W, Wautier MP, Rahuel C, et al. Endothelial Lu/BCAM glycoproteins are novel ligands for red blood cell alpha4beta1 integrin: role in adhesion of sickle red blood cells to endothelial cells. Blood 2007; 109:3544–3551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Brown MD, Wick TM, Eckman JR. Activation of vascular endothelial cell adhesion molecule expression by sickle blood cells. Pediatr Pathol Mol Med 2001; 20:47–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Johnson C, Telen MJ. Adhesion molecules and hydroxyurea in the pathophysiology of sickle cell disease. Haematologica 2008; 93:481–485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Wick TM, Eckman JR. Molecular basis of sickle cell-endothelial cell interactions. Curr Opin Hematol 1996; 3:118–124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Swerlick RA, Eckman JR, Kumar A, et al. Alpha 4 beta 1-integrin expression on sickle reticulocytes: vascular cell adhesion molecule-1-dependent binding to endothelium. Blood 1993; 82:1891–1899. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Christopher CJ, Rhonda LA, Eugene PO, et al. Integrin a4b1 and glycoprotein IV (CD36) are expressed on circulating reticulocytes in sickle cell anemia. Blood 1993; 82:3548–3555. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Zennadi R, Moeller BJ, Whalen EJ, et al. Epinephrine-induced activation of LW-mediated sickle cell adhesion and vaso-occlusion in vivo. Blood 2007; 110:2708–2717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Alapan Y, Fraiwan A, Kucukal E, et al. Emerging point-of-care technologies for sickle cell disease screening and monitoring. Expert Rev Med Devices 2016; 13:1073–1093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Styles LA, Lubin B, Vichinsky E, et al. Decrease of very late activation antigen-4 and CD36 on reticulocytes in sickle cell patients treated with hydroxyurea. Blood 1997; 89:2554–2559. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Manwani D, Chen G, Carullo V, et al. Single-dose intravenous gammaglobulin can stabilize neutrophil Mac-1 activation in sickle cell pain crisis. Am J Hematol 2015; 90:381–385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Picot J, Goudot C, Berkenou J, et al. Flow cytometry analyses reveal association between Lu/BCAM adhesion molecule and osteonecrosis in sickle cell disease. Am J Hematol 2014; 89:115–117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Chaar V, Laurance S, Lapoumeroulie C, et al. Hydroxycarbamide decreases sickle reticulocyte adhesion to resting endothelium by inhibiting endothelial lutheran/basal cell adhesion molecule (Lu/BCAM) through phosphodiesterase 4A activation. J Biol Chem 2014; 289:11512–11521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Kaul DK, Fabry ME, Nagel RL. Microvascular sites and characteristics of sickle cell adhesion to vascular endothelium in shear flow conditions: pathophysiological implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1989; 86:3356–3360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Barabino GA, McIntire LV, Eskin SG, et al. Endothelial cell interactions with sickle cell, sickle trait, mechanically injured, and normal erythrocytes under controlled flow. Blood 1987; 70:152–157. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Hebbel RP. Adhesive interactions of sickle erythrocytes with endothelium. J Clin Invest 1997; 100:S83–S86. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Alapan Y, Kim C, Adhikari A, et al. Sickle cell disease biochip: a functional red blood cell adhesion assay for monitoring sickle cell disease. Transl Res 2016; 173:74–91; e8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.An R, Man Y, Cheng K, et al. Sickle red blood cell derived extracellular vesicles activate endothelial cells and enhance sickle red cell adhesion mediated by von Willebrand factor. bioRxiv 2022; 2022.05.25.492883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Kim M, Alapan Y, Adhikari A, et al. Hypoxia-enhanced adhesion of red blood cells in microscale flow. Microcirculation 2017; 24:e12374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Kucukal E, Ilich A, Nigel SK, et al. Red blood cell adhesion to heme-activated endothelial cells reflects clinical phenotype in sickle cell disease. Am J Hematol 2018; 93:1050–1060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Kucukal E, Man Y, Quinn E, et al. Red blood cell adhesion to ICAM-1 is mediated by fibrinogen and is associated with right-to-left shunts in sickle cell disease. Blood Adv 2020; 4:3688–3698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Wulftange W, Kucukal E, Man Y, et al. Thrombin-induced endothelial cell damage is mitigated by human anti-thrombin III in a microfluidic device. Blood 2020; 136:24–25.32430494 [Google Scholar]
- 70.Man Y, Goreke U, Kucukal E, et al. Leukocyte adhesion to P-selectin and the inhibitory role of Crizanlizumab in sickle cell disease: a standardized microfluidic assessment. Blood Cells Mol Dis 2020; 83:102424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Man Y, Kucukal E, Liu S, et al. Heterogeneous hypoxia-mediated neutrophil and red blood cell adhesion to E-selectin in microscale flow. Blood 2018; 132(Suppl 1):3671–13671. [Google Scholar]
- 72.Kucukal E, Man Y, Gurkan UA, Schmidt BE. Blood flow velocimetry in a microchannel during coagulation using particle image velocimetry and wavelet-based optical flow velocimetry. J Biomech Eng 2021; 143:. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Kucukal E, William JW, Man Y, et al. Antithrombin-III mitigates thrombin mediated endothelial cell contraction and sickle red blood cell adhesion in microscale flow. Br J Haematol (in press). doi: 10.1111/bjh.18328 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Noomuna P, Risinger M, Zhou S, et al. Inhibition of Band 3 tyrosine phosphorylation: a new mechanism for treatment of sickle cell disease. Br J Haematol 2020; 190:599–609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Belcher JD, Marker PH, Weber JP, et al. Activated monocytes in sickle cell disease: potential role in the activation of vascular endothelium and vaso-occlusion. Blood 2000; 96:2451–2459. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Shet AS, Aras O, Gupta K, et al. Sickle blood contains tissue factor-positive microparticles derived from endothelial cells and monocytes. Blood 2003; 102:2678–2683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Setty BN, Key NS, Rao AK, et al. Tissue factor-positive monocytes in children with sickle cell disease: correlation with biomarkers of haemolysis. Br J Haematol 2012; 157:370–380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Perelman N, Selvaraj SK, Batra S, et al. Placenta growth factor activates monocytes and correlates with sickle cell disease severity. Blood 2003; 102:1506–1514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Kaul DK, Hebbel RP. Hypoxia/reoxygenation causes inflammatory response in transgenic sickle mice but not in normal mice. J Clin Invest 2000; 106:411–420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Hofstra TC, Kalra VK, Meiselman HJ, Coates TD. Sickle erythrocytes adhere to polymorphonuclear neutrophils and activate the neutrophil respiratory burst. Blood 1996; 87:4440–4447. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Chang J, Shi PA, Chiang EY, Frenette PS. Intravenous immunoglobulins reverse acute vaso-occlusive crises in sickle cell mice through rapid inhibition of neutrophil adhesion. Blood 2008; 111:915–923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Miller ST, Sleeper LA, Pegelow CH, et al. Prediction of adverse outcomes in children with sickle cell disease. N Engl J Med 2000; 342:83–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Wongtong N, Jones S, Deng Y, et al. Monocytosis is associated with hemolysis in sickle cell disease. Hematology 2015; 20:593–597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Elmariah H, Garrett ME, De Castro LM, et al. Factors associated with survival in a contemporary adult sickle cell disease cohort. Am J Hematol 2014; 89:530–535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Boghossian SH, Nash G, Dormandy J, Bevan DH. Abnormal neutrophil adhesion in sickle cell anaemia and crisis: relationship to blood rheology. Br J Haematol 1991; 78:437–441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Telen MJ. Cellular adhesion and the endothelium: E-selectin, L-selectin, and pan-selectin inhibitors. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2014; 28:341–354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Field JJ, Nathan DG. Advances in sickle cell therapies in the hydroxyurea era. Mol Med 2014; 20(Suppl 1):S37–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Okpala I Investigational selectin-targeted therapy of sickle cell disease. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2015; 24:229–238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Telen MJ, Wun T, McCavit TL, et al. Randomized phase 2 study of GMI-1070 in SCD: reduction in time to resolution of vaso-occlusive events and decreased opioid use. Blood 2015; 125:2656–2664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Kucukal E, Wolfe A, Kocevar R, et al. Assessment of the effect of crizanlizumab on red blood cell adhesion to endothelial cells using a standardized endothelium-on-a-chip microfluidic platform. Blood 2021; 138(Suppl 1):2021–12021.33895794 [Google Scholar]
- 91.Ataga KI, Key NS. Hypercoagulability in sickle cell disease: new approaches to an old problem. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. Hematology 2007; 2007:91–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Nasimuzzaman M, Malik P. Role of the coagulation system in the pathogenesis of sickle cell disease. Blood Adv 2019; 3:3170–3180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Sparkenbaugh E, Pawlinski R. Prothrombotic aspects of sickle cell disease. J Thromb Haemost 2017; 15:1307–1316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Nsiri B, Gritli N, Bayoudh F, et al. Abnormalities of coagulation and fibrinolysis in homozygous sickle cell disease. Hematol Cell Ther 1996; 38:279–284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Faes C, Ilich A, Sotiaux A, et al. Red blood cells modulate structure and dynamics of venous clot formation in sickle cell disease. Blood 2019; 133:2529–2541. ■ This article systematically studied the role of SCD RBCs in clot formation in SCD.
- 96.Pandian NKR, Mannino RG, Lam WA, Jain A. Thrombosis-on-a-chip: prospective impact of microphysiological models of vascular thrombosis. Curr Opin Biomed Eng 2018; 5:29–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Solovey A, Kollander R, Shet A, et al. Endothelial cell expression of tissue factor in sickle mice is augmented by hypoxia/reoxygenation and inhibited by lovastatin. Blood 2004; 104:840–846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Zhang D, Xu C, Manwani D, Frenette PS. Neutrophils, platelets, and inflammatory pathways at the nexus of sickle cell disease pathophysiology. Blood 2016; 127:801–809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Inwald DP, Kirkham FJ, Peters MJ, et al. Platelet and leucocyte activation in childhood sickle cell disease: association with nocturnal hypoxaemia. Br J Haematol 2000; 111:474–481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Dominical VM, Samsel L, Nichols JS, et al. Prominent role of platelets in the formation of circulating neutrophil-red cell heterocellular aggregates in sickle cell anemia. Haematologica 2014; 99:e214–e217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
