Medical practice and the law in the conflict between traditional belief and empirical evidence: post-mortem caesarean section in the nineteenth century

. 1999 Oct;43(4):485–501. doi: 10.1017/s0025727300065716

Medical practice and the law in the conflict between traditional belief and empirical evidence: post-mortem caesarean section in the nineteenth century.

PMCID: PMC1044182 PMID: 10885146

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

Katz V. L., Dotters D. J., Droegemueller W. Perimortem cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Oct;68(4):571–576. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Meinert J. Die Sectio in mortua. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1982 Apr;42(4):310–312. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1036767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Merchan Lopez D. Cesarea post-mortem. Rev Obstet Ginecol Venez. 1968;28(1):129–146. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Tröhler U. Klinisch-numerische Forschung in der britischen Geburtshilfe 1750-1820. Gesnerus. 1981;38(1-2):69–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
de Demerson P. La cesarea post mortem en la España de la ilustracion. Asclepio. 1976;28:185–233. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]