Abstract
Background: Significant associations between the presence of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and uterine anomalies have been reported. It is unclear whether high anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels coexist with the development of uterine malformations in women with PCOS. This study sought to investigate the association between Müllerian duct anomalies and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels in women with PCOS.
Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, the records of 1,391 women with PCOS were analyzed. The cohort was divided into a low-AMH group (n = 700) and a high-AMH group (n = 691), based on an AMH cutoff value of 8.45 ng/ml. Müllerian duct anomalies were classified into four subtypes based on three-dimensional ultrasonography: septate uterus, bicornuate uterus, uterus didelphys, unicornuate uterus, and arcuate uterus. The primary outcome was the overall incidence of Müllerian duct anomalies. The secondary outcome was the prevalence of the abovementioned specific types of Müllerian duct anomalies. The prevalence of Müllerian duct anomalies was analyzed using the chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test.
Results: Among the patients with PCOS, the prevalence of unicornuate uterus anomalies was higher in the high-AMH group than in the low-AMH group (1.0% vs. 0.1%, P = 0.04). No statistically significant difference in the overall incidence of uterine malformations was found between the two AMH groups (4.3% vs. 5.7%, P = 0.22).
Conclusions: Our study confirmed a higher prevalence of unicornuate uterus in PCOS women with high AMH levels. Clinicians might decide to investigate the possibility of a unicornuate uterus in PCOS women with high AMH levels.
Keywords: uterine malformation, unicornuate uterus, polycystic ovary syndrome, müllerian duct anomalies, anti-mullerian hormone
Introduction
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is common in women, and its pathophysiology appears to be polygenic and multifactorial. It is characterized by abnormal metabolic, endocrine, and reproductive factors, and is clinically diagnosed depending on anovulation/oligo-ovulation, hyperandrogenism, and polycystic ovaries. Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), also called Müllerian inhibiting factor, is secreted by granulosa cells of the small antral and pre-antral ovarian follicles [1]. AMH restrains the recruitment of primordial follicles and contributes to ovulatory disturbances in women [2]. Several studies have confirmed that the serum concentration of AMH is a strong indicator of PCOS [2,3]. AMH plays important roles in sexual gonadal differentiation, development, and functions in women with PCOS [4,5]. In animal models, exposure to high AMH levels in utero reprograms the fetus and induces PCOS in adulthood [6].
Müllerian duct anomalies are a group of disorders that occur when the Müllerian ducts fail to develop normally. The Müllerian ducts are the embryological precursors of the female reproductive tract, including the fallopian tubes, uterus, cervix, and the upper part of the vagina. Müllerian duct anomalies consist of a group of miscellaneous deviations from normal duct anatomy. The most common Müllerian duct anomalies include a unicornuate, didelphys, bicornuate, septate, or arcuate uterus. Müllerian duct anomalies are the result of failure of abnormal formation, fusion, or resorption of the Müllerian ducts during fetal life, and can result in repeated pregnancy loss, preterm delivery, persistent menstrual irregularity, and dysmenorrhea [7,8]. Some studies have reported significant associations between the presence of PCOS and Müllerian duct anomalies [9-11]. However, whether AMH levels play a role in the development of Müllerian duct anomalies in PCOS women is unclear.
To date, no study has investigated whether AMH is associated with Müllerian duct anomalies in women with PCOS. We hypothesized that in women with PCOS, the serum concentration of AMH would be associated with the prevalence of Müllerian duct anomalies. In this retrospective cohort study, we investigated this hypothesis.
Materials and methods
Institutional review board approval
This study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Women’s Hospital School of Medicine, Zhejiang University (IRB-20210110-R). This was a retrospective study with all data extracted from medical records during routine clinical practice; therefore, the need to obtain informed patient consent was waived.
Selection criteria
Data of patients who underwent inpatient surgery at the Women’s Hospital School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, between March 2017 and December 2020 were collected. All clinical records and information were anonymized prior to the analysis. Patients were included if they met all of the following criteria: (i) age between 18-40 years, (ii) PCOS diagnosis based on the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology Recommendations for PCOS 2018 [12], (iii) three-dimensional ultrasonography of the uterus performed at least once. The exclusion criteria were as follows: correction of any Müllerian duct anomalies before the execution of the three-dimensional ultrasonography of the uterus.
All data were extracted from the inpatient database of the Women’s Hospital School of Medicine, Zhejiang University. The workflow of the study is provided in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Workflow of the study.
AMH, anti-Müllerian hormone.
Determination of Müllerian duct anomalies
Müllerian duct anomalies are those structural anomalies caused by errors in the development of the Müllerian duct, which is the embryonic structure that develops into the female reproductive tract. Müllerian duct anomalies usually lead to structural anomalies of the uterus. Three-dimensional ultrasonography was performed by medical sonographers with over 8 years of experience in order to determine Müllerian duct anomalies. Based on the criteria defined by the American Fertility Society system, Müllerian duct anomalies in this study were classified into five subtypes: septate uterus, bicornuate uterus, uterus didelphys, unicornuate uterus, and arcuate uterus [13].
Exposure and outcomes
Patients were assigned to two study groups based on the median AMH level in our study population: the high-AMH group (serum concentration of AMH>8.45 ng/ml), and the low-AMH group (serum concentration of AMH ≤ 8.45 ng/ml). The primary outcome was the overall incidence of Müllerian duct anomalies. The secondary outcome was the prevalence of specific types of müllerian duct anomalies, namely septate uterus, bicornuate uterus, uterus didelphys, unicornuate uterus, and arcuate uterus.
Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed using SPSS Statistics version 22.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). The prevalence of uterine abnormalities was compared between the low- and high-AMH groups. Continuous variables, including age, body mass index (BMI), gravidity, parity, AMH, and testosterone were analyzed using Student’s t-test, whereas categorical variables, including the prevalence of Müllerian duct anomalies, were analyzed using the chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test.
Results
A total of 1,391 women diagnosed with PCOS were enrolled, including 700 in the low-AMH group and 691 in the high-AMH group. Compared to patients in the low-AMH group, those in the high-AMH group had a lower BMI (22.3 ± 2.9 kg/m2 vs. 23.1 ± 3.9 kg/m2, P < 0.05), and higher serum testosterone (1.4 ± 0.7 nmol/L vs. 1.2 ± 0.7 nmol/L, P < 0.05) levels. No significant differences between the two groups were identified for other clinical features (Table 1).
Table 1. Baseline characteristics.
Data were mean (standard deviation). BMI, body mass index; AMH, anti-Müllerian hormone. Variables were calculated by Student t-test.
Variables | Low AMH (n=700) | High AMH (n=691) | P-value |
Age, year | 28.1±3.7 | 28.0±3.7 | 0.59 |
BMI, kg/m2 | 23.1±3.9 | 22.3±2.9 | <0.01 |
Gravidity | 0.7±1.1 | 0.6±0.9 | 0.05 |
Parity | 0.1±0.4 | 0.1±0.4 | 0.96 |
AMH, ng/ml | 5.9±1.6 | 12.7±3.7 | <0.01 |
Testosterone, nmol/l | 1.2±0.7 | 1.4±0.7 | <0.01 |
Menstrual cycle length, n (%) | <0.01 | ||
<26 days | 30 (4.3%) | 41 (5.9%) | |
26-34 days | 51 (7.3%) | 37 (5.3%) | |
35-41 days | 141 (20.1%) | 89 (12.8%) | |
6 weeks to 3 months | 279 (39.8%) | 271 (49.3%) | |
>3 months | 200 (28.5%) | 260 (37.2%) |
Compared to women in the low-AMH group, those in the high-AMH group had a higher prevalence of unicornuate uterus anomalies (1.0% vs. 0.1%, P = 0.04). No other anomalies were significantly different between the two groups. There was no statistical difference in the overall incidence of uterine malformations between the two groups (4.3% vs. 5.7%, P = 0.22) (Table 2).
Table 2. Prevalence of uterine anomalies.
Data were n, %. Variables were calculated with chi-squared tests or Fisher’s exact test. AMH, anti-Müllerian hormone.
Uterine anomalies | Low AMH (n=700) | High AMH (n=691) | P-value |
Overall | 30, 4.3% | 40, 5.7% | 0.22 |
Septate uterus | 15, 2.1% | 16, 2.3% | 0.85 |
Bicornuate uterus | 1, 0.1% | 3, 0.4% | 0.37 |
Uterus didelphys | 1, 0.1% | 0, 0.0% | 1.00 |
Unicornuate uterus | 1, 0.1% | 7, 1.0% | 0.04 |
Arcuate uterus | 12, 1.7% | 14, 2.0% | 0.70 |
Discussion
In this study, we evaluated the association between Müllerian duct anomalies and AMH levels in women with PCOS. Among women with PCOS, we found a significantly (10-fold) higher prevalence of unicornuate uterus anomalies in the high-AMH group compared to the low-AMH group.
Recent studies have suggested that changes in the intrauterine environment, such as excessive androgen [14,15] or AMH [6] exposure during the embryonic period, may be partially responsible for the development of PCOS [16]. One animal study has shown that prenatal AMH exposure could lead to PCOS in adulthood [6]. On the other hand, AMH signals the prenatal regression of the Müllerian ducts in the fetus. AMH and testosterone act synergistically to suppress the development of Müllerian ducts and promote the development of Wolffian ducts in male embryos, whereas in the absence of these two hormones the Müllerian ducts develop into female genitalia [17,18]. Our study confirmed a correlation between the prevalence of Müllerian duct anomalies due to abnormal organogenesis of the uterus and high AMH levels in patients with PCOS, inferring that the association between PCOS and some types of Müllerian duct anomalies, such as unicornuate uterus, could be explained by certain developmental defects that contribute to both PCOS and Müllerian duct anomalies. Considering that AMH and testosterone play an important role during the early degeneration of Müllerian ducts [19-21], as well as the strong heritability of PCOS [15], we suggest that high prenatal AMH exposure leads to both PCOS and Müllerian duct anomalies in female offspring.
Moreover, in animal models of PCOS, exposure to high AMH levels in utero reprograms the fetus and induces PCOS in adulthood [6]. In adult women with PCOS, the severity of the reproductive dysfunction correlates positively with serum AMH levels [22,23], and AMH could also serve as an indicator of PCOS severity. Taken together, a high level of AMH (indicating severe PCOS) and Müllerian duct anomalies may be two consequences of high prenatal AMH exposure.
The development of the Müllerian duct typically involves three stages: organogenesis, fusion, and septal resorption or tabularization. Disruption of development at any stage can lead to uterine abnormalities. Organogenesis abnormalities include uterine hypoplasia, such as Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome and unicornuate uterus. Abnormal fusion, septal absorption, or tabularization can lead to uterus didelphys, bicornuate, septate, and arcuate uterus [24]. The risk factors for Müllerian duct anomalies remain unclear but include hypoxia during pregnancy, the use of diethylstilbestrol, exposure to hazardous waste, ionizing radiation, and viral infections [25-27]. The specific mechanism by which the uterine septum regresses is reported to be associated with apoptosis, which is further regulated by BCL2 [28].
A major limitation of this study is that the number of patients with Müllerian duct anomalies was small, and adjustments for confounding factors, such as age and parity, could not be made. Moreover, the number of patients with bicornuate uterus and uterus didelphys were too few (2 and 4, respectively), and therefore the results of these two types of anomalies may have not reached statistical significance. Further research should expand the study population to address these limitations. Another limitation is that patients with amenorrhea due to uterine hypoplasia were not included in the study, because of the need to measure the menstrual cycle for PCOS diagnosis. Additionally, some data were unavailable, which is inevitable in retrospective studies. This may also have limited the significance of the results obtained in this study.
Conclusions
In conclusion, the present study confirmed a higher prevalence of unicornuate uterus in PCOS women with high AMH levels. These findings could potentially influence the diagnostic process for women with PCOS. If a woman with PCOS presents with high AMH levels, clinicians might decide to investigate the possibility of a unicornuate uterus or other Müllerian duct anomalies. This study expands our understanding of the relationships among PCOS, AMH, and Müllerian duct anomalies, and could inform clinical practice and guide future research. It is essential to note, however, that the relationship uncovered in this study is correlational and does not prove causation. Additional research would be needed to firmly establish the reasons behind these associations.
Acknowledgments
Derived data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on request via email. Min Yang and Fang Zhang contributed equally to the work and should be considered co-first authors.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province under Grant LGF22H040011, the Health Commission of Zhejiang Province under Grant 2022KY857, and the Zhejiang Provincial Department of Education under Grant Y202146852.
Human Ethics
Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Ethics Committee of the Women’s Hospital School of Medicine, Zhejiang University issued approval IRB-20210110-R. This was a retrospective study with all data extracted from medical records during routine clinical practice; therefore, the need to obtain informed patient consent was waived.
Animal Ethics
Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue.
References
- 1.Regulation of ovarian function: the role of anti-Müllerian hormone. Durlinger AL, Visser JA, Themmen AP. Reproduction. 2002;124:601–609. doi: 10.1530/rep.0.1240601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Serum anti-Mullerian hormone as a surrogate for antral follicle count for definition of the polycystic ovary syndrome. Pigny P, Jonard S, Robert Y, Dewailly D. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91:941–945. doi: 10.1210/jc.2005-2076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Anti-Müllerian hormone serum concentrations in normoovulatory and anovulatory women of reproductive age. Laven JS, Mulders AG, Visser JA, Themmen AP, De Jong FH, Fauser BC. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89:318–323. doi: 10.1210/jc.2003-030932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Biological variability in serum anti-Müllerian hormone throughout the menstrual cycle in ovulatory and sporadic anovulatory cycles in eumenorrheic women. Kissell KA, Danaher MR, Schisterman EF, et al. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:1764–1772. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.New insights into anti-Müllerian hormone role in the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis and neuroendocrine development. Silva MS, Giacobini P. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2021;78:1–16. doi: 10.1007/s00018-020-03576-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Elevated prenatal anti-Müllerian hormone reprograms the fetus and induces polycystic ovary syndrome in adulthood. Tata B, Mimouni NE, Barbotin AL, et al. Nat Med. 2018;24:834–846. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0035-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Congenital uterine anomalies affecting reproduction. Reichman DE, Laufer MR. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;24:193–208. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2009.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies: a systematic review. Chan YY, Jayaprakasan K, Tan A, Thornton JG, Coomarasamy A, Raine-Fenning NJ. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38:371–382. doi: 10.1002/uog.10056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.The prevalence of uterine anomalies in infertile patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: a retrospective study in a tertiary center in Southeastern Turkey. Ege S, Peker N, Bademkıran MH. Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;16:224–227. doi: 10.4274/tjod.galenos.2019.62589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Polycystic ovarian syndrome and congenital uterine anomalies: the hidden common player. Saleh HA, Shawky Moiety FM. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;290:355–360. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3193-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.High prevalence of mullerian anomalies diagnosed by ultrasound in women with polycystic ovaries. Appelman Z, Hazan Y, Hagay Z. https://europepmc.org/article/med/12815910. J Reprod Med. 2003;48:362–364. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Recommendations from the international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome. Teede HJ, Misso ML, Costello MF, et al. Hum Reprod. 2018;33:1602–1618. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, mullerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. The American Fertility Society. Fertil Steril. 1988;49:944–955. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59942-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Prenatal androgen exposure and transgenerational susceptibility to polycystic ovary syndrome. Risal S, Pei Y, Lu H, et al. Nat Med. 2019;25:1894–1904. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0666-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.New perspectives on the pathogenesis of PCOS: neuroendocrine origins. Walters KA, Gilchrist RB, Ledger WL, Teede HJ, Handelsman DJ, Campbell RE. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2018;29:841–852. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2018.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Polycystic ovary syndrome is transmitted via a transgenerational epigenetic process. Mimouni NE, Paiva I, Barbotin AL, et al. Cell Metab. 2021;33:513–530. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2021.01.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.The age factor in the castration of male rabbit fetuses. Jost A. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1947;66:302. doi: 10.3181/00379727-66-16071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Investigation of hormonal control of genesis of the sex organs in rabbit and notes on certain malformations of the genital apparatus in man (Article in Spanish) . Jost A. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13010521/ Ginecol Obstet Mex. 1952;7:477–492. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Anti-Mullerian hormone levels reflect severity of PCOS but are negatively influenced by obesity: relationship with increased luteinizing hormone levels. Piouka A, Farmakiotis D, Katsikis I, Macut D, Gerou S, Panidis D. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2009;296:0–43. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.90684.2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Anti-Müllerian hormone and polycystic ovary syndrome: a mountain too high? Pellatt L, Rice S, Mason HD. Reproduction. 2010;139:825–833. doi: 10.1530/REP-09-0415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Differences of the association of anti-Müllerian hormone with clinical or biochemical characteristics between women with and without polycystic ovary syndrome. Woo HY, Kim KH, Rhee EJ, Park H, Lee MK. Endocr J. 2012;59:781–790. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.ej12-0055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Granulosa cell production of anti-Müllerian hormone is increased in polycystic ovaries. Pellatt L, Hanna L, Brincat M, Galea R, Brain H, Whitehead S, Mason H. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92:240–245. doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-1582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Elevated serum level of anti-mullerian hormone in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: relationship to the ovarian follicle excess and to the follicular arrest. Pigny P, Merlen E, Robert Y, Cortet-Rudelli C, Decanter C, Jonard S, Dewailly D. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88:5957–5962. doi: 10.1210/jc.2003-030727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wilson D, Bordoni B. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): Statpearls Publishing; 2023. Embryology, Mullerian ducts (paramesonephric ducts) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Mullerian duct anomalies: from diagnosis to intervention. Chandler TM, Machan LS, Cooperberg PL, Harris AC, Chang SD. Br J Radiol. 2009;82:1034–1042. doi: 10.1259/bjr/99354802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ecological study of effects of industrial watershed on Müllerian anomalies in an obstetric population. Schaible B, Annie F, Seybold D, Calhoun BC. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2020;202:110819. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Müllerian duct anomalies: review of current management. Ribeiro SC, Tormena RA, Peterson TV, Gonzáles Mde O, Serrano PG, Almeida JA, Baracat EC. Sao Paulo Med J. 2009;127:92–96. doi: 10.1590/S1516-31802009000200007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Localization of Bcl-2 in the human fetal mullerian tract. Lee DM, Osathanondh R, Yeh J. Fertil Steril. 1998;70:135–140. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00126-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]