Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33863-z, published online 09 May 2023
The original version of this Article contained errors in Table 2, where values were missing under the column “WSIs”. The correct and incorrect columns appear below.
Incorrect:
| All included | Training and validation set | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of cases | WSIs | Number of Cases | WSIs |
| 479 | 1832 | 369 | 1435 |
| 4 | 744* | 2 | 593 |
| 475 | 1087 | 367 | 842 |
| 4 | 744 | 2 | 593 |
| 219 | 178 | ||
| 256 | 189 | ||
| 4 | 744 | 2 | 594 |
| 81 | 63 | 177 | |
| 138 | 115 | 226 | |
| 138 | 98 | 215 | |
| 118 | 91 | 223 | |
Correct:
| All included | Training and validation set | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of cases | WSIs | Number of cases | WSIs |
| 479 | 1832 | 369 | 1435 |
| 4 | 745* | 2 | 594 |
| 475 | 1087 | 367 | 841 |
| 4 | 745 | 2 | 594 |
| 219 | 506 | 178 | 403 |
| 256 | 581 | 189 | 438 |
| 4 | 745 | 2 | 594 |
| 81 | 230 | 63 | 177 |
| 138 | 276 | 115 | 226 |
| 138 | 294 | 98 | 215 |
| 118 | 287 | 91 | 223 |
The original Article has been corrected.