Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 9;150(15):dev201432. doi: 10.1242/dev.201432

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Changes in expression of key TFs upon disruption of putative EFTF CREs. (A,D) Bigwig tracks of candidate Rax and Six6 enhancers, displaying accessibility changes across days 1, 3 and 5, consensus peaks and regions deleted by CRISPR. (B,E) Brightfield and GFP images of day 5 organoids derived from CRISPR-Cas9-edited cell lines with wild-type (WT; top) or mutant sequences for the predicted Rax and Six6 CREs. Images represent the variability seen in organoid structure and GFP expression. Twenty-four organoids were grown in three replicates, and all showed similar levels of variation between organoids. Scale bars: 100 µm. (C,F) NanoString quantification of gene expression between WT and mutant (KO) organoids for the proximal Rax (C) and distal Six6 (F) enhancers (WT/mutant differences in log2 expression tested using Welch's t-test).