Version Changes
Revised. Amendments from Version 1
1) We addressed some typos related to the ability to control the Carrier-Envelope-Phase (CEP) of the THz pulse, previously referred to as Carrier-Envelope-Offset (CEO). 2) Inclusion of a new affiliation for the authors Alessia Pasquazi, Juan Sebastian Totero Gongora, and Marco Peccianti. 3) Change of the email address for the corresponding author.
Abstract
Controlling the transmission of broadband optical pulses in scattering media is a critical open challenge in photonics. To date, wavefront shaping techniques at optical frequencies have been successfully applied to control the spatial properties of multiple-scattered light. However, a fundamental restriction in achieving an equivalent degree of control over the temporal properties of a broadband pulse is the limited availability of experimental techniques to detect the coherent properties (i.e., the spectral amplitude and absolute phase) of the transmitted field. Terahertz experimental frameworks, on the contrary, enable measuring the field dynamics of broadband pulses at ultrafast (sub-cycle) time scales directly. In this work, we provide a theoretical/numerical demonstration that, within this context, complex scattering can be used to achieve spatio-temporal control of instantaneous fields and manipulate the temporal properties of single-cycle pulses by solely acting on spatial degrees of freedom of the illuminating field. As direct application scenarios, we demonstrate spatio-temporal focusing, chirp compensation, and control of the carrier-envelope-phase (CEP) of a CP-stable, transform-limited THz pulse.
Keywords: Scattering, terahertz, time-domain spectroscopy, random medium, spatiotemporal focusing, superfocusing, genetic algorithm
Plain language summary
Multiple scattering of light is a common phenomenon in everyday life. The opaqueness of fog, milk, and clouds are excellent examples of how light is scrambled when travelling through materials composed of thousands of particles scattering light in all directions. While scattering is generally perceived as unwanted, researchers have shown that complex but inexpensive substances like white paint or frosted glass can be adapted to behave as expensive optical devices, such as high-resolution lenses or optical computing devices. This surprising result is achieved by using particular projectors on the incident light to impress specific patterns yielding a desired shape at the output. While manipulating the spatial profile of light is now well-understood, controlling how scattering affects ultra-short light pulses remains exceptionally challenging, primarily due to the difficulty in measuring the effects of scattering at the ultrafast timescales of the pulse (quadrillionths of a second).
In this theoretical work, we propose a new way to tackle this challenge by leveraging the unique properties of terahertz light waves. Terahertz light lies between microwaves and infrared in the electromagnetic spectrum and is highly sought in research and industry. It can easily reveal the material composition of an object and penetrate common materials like paper and plastic as X-rays do, but without being harmful. More importantly, we can experimentally detect the individual oscillations in a terahertz pulse and extract an unprecedented understanding of how scattering affects it.
We show that this added knowledge gives us the ability to finely manipulate the properties of the pulse, compensate the pulse-broadening effects of scattering, and “engineer” specific pulse shapes, a highly-sought ability in photonics. In the long term, this ability could be applied to reveal the internal composition of complex samples, such as biological tissue, or extract images of samples placed behind (or within) scattering materials.
Introduction
Multiple scattering is generally perceived as detrimental in photonics, as it is commonly associated with unpredictability and loss of information. For instance, in microscopy or astronomy, scattering is widely known to severely affect the resolution and fidelity of an imaging system 1, 2 . As a result, a large body of research has historically focused on compensating or straight-out eliminating scattering effects 3– 5 . In a stark paradigm shift, researchers have recently demonstrated that disordered media can become essential ingredients in developing photonic devices with sophisticated optical performances 6– 9 . These include, among others, scattering-assisted super-resolution imaging lenses, wavefront-shaping components, or optical neuro-computing devices 10– 18 . At their heart, these demonstrations rely on wavefront shaping techniques, i.e., on the identification of an optimal incident field distribution, or pattern, yielding a desired intensity distribution at the output of a scattering medium 19, 20 . While the ability to control monochromatic beams' spatial properties has matured recently, manipulating the temporal and spectral properties of the scattered field remains challenging, particularly when considering broadband ultrafast illumination 21– 25 . Multiple scattering is an inherently dispersive phenomenon that naturally leads to the broadening of optical pulses 26, 27 . Recent works have shown that the intrinsic coupling between spatial and temporal dimensions in scattering media can be leveraged to manipulate the temporal properties of pulses by controlling the spatial features of the illumination 28, 29 . As a result, spatial wavefront shaping can be applied to achieve spatiotemporal focusing, corresponding to a simultaneous focusing in space and pulse re-compression in time, either through iterative approaches or by measuring the frequency-dependent transmission matrix of the sample 21, 30– 32 . These approaches have shown how to control the envelope of the transmitted waveform successfully (e.g., to adjust the centre of the transmitted pulse 32– 35 ), but they remain unsuitable for manipulating the carrier-wave properties (e.g., the carrier-envelope offset of the transmitted pulse). Further advances in this area are fundamentally hindered by the inability to directly measure the full-wave properties of the scattered field, most notably the absolute spectral phase 23, 35 . An interesting question is whether a direct measurement of the electric field oscillations could enable controlling the coherent features of the transmitted pulse and devising advanced forms of waveform synthesis and spectral shaping currently out-of-reach at optical frequencies. In this context, field-sensitive detection is well-established in terahertz (THz) photonics, where time-domain spectroscopy (TDS) grants access to the time-resolved detection of the electric field of single-cycle THz pulses 36 . Leveraging this ability, THz-TDS has been applied to study the broadband properties of scattering samples, with a particular emphasis on the role of multiple scattering in biomedical applications 26, 27, 37– 40 and the effects of resonant excitation of the scatterers composing the medium 41– 45 . However, the implementation of a complete, field-based wavefront control methodology to manipulate broadband pulses is essentially unexplored in the THz frequency band. In this work, we provide a first theoretical exploration of the potential advantages offered by time-resolved, field-sensitive detection in manipulating broadband THz pulses using scattering media. We combine the nonlinear generation of THz patterns from structured optical beams with an evolutionary optimisation feedback-loop targeting the coherent, full-field properties of the transmitted field, showcasing the ability to achieve spatiotemporal focus and control the absolute phase of the transmitted pulse. Quite interestingly, access to the absolute spectral phase of the pulse enables the definition of effective spectral shaping strategies, such as the ability to compress an incident chirped-pulse or control the carrier-envelop-phase (CEP) of an incident pulse, a significantly challenging task at optical frequencies.
Physical framework and methodology
Problem definition: full-wave control of THz pulses in complex media
We model the linear transmission properties of the scattering medium through a dispersive transmission operator TM ( x, y, ω) 33, 46 . For the sake of simplicity, we focus on a scalar description of the scatterer, but our approach can be easily extended to a full-vector formulation 47 .
In the presence of an input field distribution E - ( x, y, ω), the field transmitted through the scatterer E + ( x, y, ω) is expressed through a (spatial) convolution relation:
Following Ref. 48, we discretize the output and input planes in M and N two-dimensional, square pixels, respectively. In such a formulation, the spectral components of the fields are re-defined as column arrays, and Equation (1) is rewritten in terms of a frequency-dependent transfer matrix T mn ( ω) as follows:
where represents the field in the m-th ( n-th) pixel of the output (input) field distributions. Following standard approaches, we express the transmission matrix as a complex-valued, random Gaussian matrix:
where ϕ mn ( ω) is a random phase distribution uncorrelated in space and gaussian-correlated along the frequency axis. The degree of spectral correlation, generally expressed in terms of the spectral correlation bandwidth Δ v c , is commonly employed to characterise the spectral response of a scattering medium, and it is generally defined as the inverse of the Thouless time 24 . In practice, a frequency-correlated transfer matrix can be modelled numerically by applying a Gaussian spectral filter of width Δ v c to a white-noise random matrix 49, 50 .
In general terms, a wavefront control approach aims to identify the optimal incident field distribution yielding the desired output field at the output facet of the scatterer 51 . However, when operating at THz frequencies, the ability to control the incident electric field distribution is hindered by the limited availability of spatial light modulator (SLM) devices. To overcome this limitation, we employ the nonlinear conversion of structured optical beams, an approach we have recently developed within the framework of time-resolved nonlinear ghost imaging (NGI) 52– 54 . With this approach, any optical pattern generated through a standard SLM device can act as a direct source of broadband THz patterns. By considering a nonlinear quadratic process (e.g., in a χ (2) crystal such as ZnTe), the relation between incident optical intensity and generated THz field is linear, i.e., E THz ( x, y, t) ∝ I pumb ( x, y, t), enabling the precise control over the THz field profile by simply shaping the incident optical pulse. A key advantage is that the spatial resolution of the THz patterns can be pushed way below the standard THz wavelength scale, as it is only bound by the diffraction limit of the optical beam. Besides, the nonlinear conversion ensures that the spatial pattern is well-defined across the whole THz band, enabling the generation and control of single-cycle, THz structured beams. We can assume that the incident THz patterns are expressed as:
where A 0 is an amplitude, P( x, y) is the (all positive) spatial profile, and f THz (ω) is the spectrum of the THz pulse, which is assumed to be the same for all input points. Figure 1 outlines a possible implementation of our wavefront-control methodology 52– 54 . The spatial pattern, impressed by an optical SLM on the pump field, is transferred to the THz pulse through nonlinear conversion in a quadratic crystal. The patterned THz field impinges on the scatterer, that is placed in close proximity (i.e., in the near-field or direct contact) of the generating crystal. Upon propagation, an electro-optical sampler collects the transmitted field in the typical fashion of standard TDS detection 55 . As our objective is to manipulate the full-field properties of the transmitted THz pulse in a specific pixel of the output plane, we introduce a spatial pinhole at the output facet of the scatterer, corresponding to the desired focal spot ( x 0, y 0). To optimise the wavefront of the transmitted pulse, the collected THz field from a predetermined ensemble of patterns is analysed and ranked through an evolutionary optimisation algorithm (e.g., a genetic algorithm (GA)) that provides the feedback required to iteratively optimise the transmitted field. This configuration enables establishing an optimisation feedback loop relying on the temporal field properties instead of average intensity, as is generally the case when operating at optical frequencies. In our configuration, the combination of near-field coupling and generation of THz patterns from structured optical fields provides a significant advantage in terms of available degrees of freedom. The THz field can be densely sampled in space, with patterns reaching sub-wavelength spatial resolution in the near-field region. This is a drastic difference from typical optical embodiments, where the spatial sampling is limited by the numerical aperture of the illumination 56 . On the contrary, in our case, the sampling can exceed the density of the modes accessible from the scatterer input facet, and the spatial density of the transfer matrix can be as high as required to represent the scattering medium accurately 48 .
Numerical implementation and optimisation strategy
To demonstrate this concept, we numerically simulated the configuration in Figure 1 using MATLAB 2021b. The plotting and simulation codes are fully compatible with Octave open-source software 57 . The simulation codes require the “statistics” Octave package, freely available through the Octave Forge repository. The plotting codes require the “signal” Octave package, freely available through the Octave Forge repository. As a THz input field, we considered a transform-limited THz pulse with a duration of 1 ps, a typical product of a bandwidth-limited optical rectification process in a nonlinear crystal. The incident pulse spectrum is centred at 1 THz (Δ v ⋅ τ p ≃ 0.44, where τ p is the full width half maximum (FWHM) pulse duration and Δ v the bandwidth of the power spectral distribution). In terms of spatial features, we considered grayscale spatial patterns composed of 33 × 33 square pixels of side Δ x = 100 μm. The scattered field spectral correlation bandwidth is Δ v c = 250 GHz, a value that is compatible with experimental literature and which places us in a non-monochromatic case 38– 40, 58 . The optimisation is performed via a standard GA targeting different fitness functions, and corresponding to the genetic algorithm described in Ref. 59. Leveraging the ability to resolve in time the transmitted electric field, we define the fitness functions maximised by the GA in terms of the statistical moments of the electric field waveform, defined as follows:
where μ, σ, and S are the first, second (standard deviation) and third moments (skewness) of the probability
distribution defined by | E( t)|. Practically speaking, these quantities correspond to the centre, duration, and symmetry of the pulse waveform. We stress that all those quantities do not relate to the pulse envelope or to locally averaged intensity profiles, as in the common optical practice. Table 1 summarises the different types of fitness functions employed in our analysis.
Table 1. The set of cost functions used in the genetic algorithm.
Fitness
function |
Definition | Type of Optimisation |
---|---|---|
A | Spatiotemporal focusing | |
B | Spatiotemporal focusing
and phase inversion |
|
C | Achieving a desired time delay t
0, temporal deviation
σ 0 and skeweness S 0 |
|
D | Phase-sensitive spectral shaping, where the aim is to
obtain a measured field E 0( ω) as close as possible to a target field E target ( ω) |
Results
Spatiotemporal focusing and temporal shift of recompressed pulses.
As an initial test case, we targeted the ability to simultaneously focus the transmitted field in space and time (spatiotemporal focusing). Our simulation results are shown in Figure 2. As an input field, we considered a single-cycle, transform-limited THz pulse ( Figure 2a). As illustrated in Figure 2b and c, the corresponding transmitted wavefront for a non-optimised pattern is generally spread in time ( Figure 2b) and scattered in space ( Figure 2c). To obtain a spatiotemporal focus, we applied our GA algorithm to maximise the cost function A, where max E 0( t) ≡ max E( x 0, y 0, t) is the peak electric-field value in the desired focal spot ( x 0, y 0). Such a fitness function simultaneously maximises the transmitted field's peak value and minimises the pulse profile's standard deviation in time.
A typical optimised pulse is shown in Figure 2e and f. showcasing our ability to simultaneously focus and recompress the transmitted pulse in the desired focal spot. The ability to restore the spectral properties of the pulse is particularly evident by comparing the spectrum of the optimised pulsed ( Figure 2d, solid green line) with the incident one ( Figure 2e, blue dashed line). Quantitatively, the optimised spectrum has an FWHM band of 0.52 THz (input 0.8 THz). Quite interestingly, our approach is sensitive to the coherent field properties of the pulse, as illustrated in Figure 2g and h, where we demonstrate the ability to flip, or invert, the optical phase of the THz pulse by employing the fitness function B from Table 1. The corresponding spectral profile is shown in Figure 2d (orange line).
Figure 3 illustrates the ability to simultaneously optimise several temporal properties of the transmitted wavefront in a single GA optimisation cycle. For this scenario, we employed the multi-objective optimisation fitness function C in Table 1, which maximises the peak field in time while simultaneously searching for incident patterns yielding an output wavefront with the desired centre t 0, duration σ 0 and skewness S 0. Specifically, we performed a series of simulations with a target duration t 0 and skewness S 0 coinciding with the transform-limited incident pulse, while we varied the target time-shift within the interval t 0 ∈ [–5 ps, 5 ps]. The factors { α, β, γ, ζ} multiplying each term are the cost function’s weights. As illustrated in Figure 3a, the pulse can be simultaneously recompressed and controllably time-shifted in a similar fashion to the case studied in Ref. 25.
However, the ability to control the pulse centre comes at the price of a reduced ability to achieve a good degree of spatiotemporal focusing, as can be evinced by assessing the properties of the optimised wavefronts ( Figure 3b–e). While in our simulations, we achieved a broad degree of control of the centre of the pulse μ ( Figure 3b), we observed an overall decrease in the peak field ( Figure 3b) and an increase in the pulse duration ( Figure 3d). This behaviour is in good qualitative agreement with the experimental results of Ref. 25. However, in the framework of THz-TDS, these results suggest that one could ideally scan the THz pulse profile within a range of a few ps without mechanical time-delay devices (i.e., translation stages), commonly used in ultrafast optical setups.
Field-sensitive spectral shaping: chirp and CEO control
A key advantage of our methodology is the possibility of detecting the coherent properties of the transmitted THz pulse. These correspond, in particular, to the spectral amplitude and absolute phase, which are generally not directly measurable quantities in experiments at optical frequencies.
The ability to coherently resolve the complex-valued spectrum of the transmitted waveforms is particularly suited to perform phase-sensitive spectral shaping of the incident pulse. For this type of task, we employ the cost function D in Table 1, where E target ( ω) is the desired spectral profile, E out ( ω) is the output spectrum, and σ( E( t)) denotes the standard deviation of the pulse in the desired focal point.
This particular choice of fitness function selects patterns yielding output waveforms with a short duration and a high degree of spectral correlation with the desired waveform. As a first example, in Figure 4, we illustrate the possibility of ‘recompressing’ at the output of the scatterer an incident pulse characterised by a linear chirp. The field profile of the incident pulse is shown in Figure 4a, while the spectral amplitude (blue line) and absolute phase (orange dots) are shown in Figure 4c, respectively. In this scenario, we choose the transform-limited version of the incident pulse as the target waveform in Figure 4a. As can be readily evinced from the optimised pulse profile shown in Figure 4b, in our simulations, we were able to restore the symmetry of the optimised wavefront, albeit for a slightly longer pulse. The ability to flatten the spectral phase is clearly shown in Figure 3d, where we report the spectral amplitude and absolute phase of the optimised pulse. Interestingly, our approach to pulse shaping can be directly applied to achieve extremely fine control of the absolute phase of the output waveform. As a final example, we assessed the possibility of finely tuning the carrier-envelope-phase (CEP) of the optimised waveform. Our results are shown in Figure. 5. In all four cases, we considered an input field corresponding to a transform-limited THz pulse (identical to the case in Figure 2a). As output wavefront targets, we considered waveforms with different CEP values ( Figure 5a–c). The corresponding optimised output fields, illustrated in Figure 5d–f, demonstrate the ability to finely tune the CEP of the output waveform, showcasing a remarkable ability to manipulate the coherent properties of the incident pulse.
Discussion and conclusions
In this work, we theoretically investigate a field-sensitive wavefront shaping methodology to control the spatiotemporal properties of terahertz pulses transmitted through a scattering medium. Our approach combines the field detection capabilities of TDS techniques with the generation of terahertz structured beams through nonlinear conversion of optical beams. Our simulations show how the full access to the coherent properties of the transmitted terahertz field enables defining phase-sensitive evolutionary optimisation strategies to manipulate the carrier-wave properties of THz pulses as they travel through complex media. As in relevant case studies, we considered different wavefront control applications, including spatiotemporal focusing, phase inversion, temporal shifting control, and re-compression of a chirped THz pulse. Quite remarkably, we demonstrated the ability to manipulate the CEP of a single-cycle, CP-stable incident pulse. Controlling the CEO of ultrafast pulses is a highly challenging task in photonics that usually requires the ability to independently control the group and phase velocity of CP-stable pulse or implementing advanced detection techniques such as f-2f interferometry 60– 62 . Our results differ from traditional spatiotemporal focusing at optical and infrared frequencies as THz-TDS detection provides a direct, coherent measure of the properties of the transmitted electric field. Such a remarkable result would have a profound impact, especially for THz imaging, since time-resolved characterisation techniques are currently highly desired due to the broad spectrum of potential applications, including deep-tissue biological imaging and time-reversal control of optical waves 63, 64 . Although we did not provide specific modelling for near-field interactions in this work, the access to the near field modes is less challenging at terahertz frequencies. Hence, it is to be noted that if the THz source is located in near-field conditions with the sample and spatially controlled with NGI-methodology, the accessible modes within the scattering medium can potentially focus light under the diffraction limit, a potential route to subwavelength imaging resolution. Moreover, TDS-based wavefront control techniques could provide a practical approach to manipulating broadband terahertz pulses' spatiotemporal properties and design entirely new classes of wavefront and spectral shaping applications. It is also important to highlight that due to the scale of the wavelengths, working at THz frequencies offers a considerable advantage to have a precise and determinist approach in sample realisation (e.g., 3D printing) 65, 66 . Additionally, the size of each scattering particle would be bigger (i.e., hundreds of micrometre 45 ) compared to what is usually used in optical frequencies (e.g., nanometre-scale 67 ), therefore rendering samples intrinsically more robust to thermal and mechanical effects. Finally, the combination of THz technology with concepts and methodologies from complex photonics opens up the intriguing (and unexplored) possibility of performing time-resolved, full-wave scattering matrix retrieval experiments.
Data availability
Underlying data
Figshare: Figure data for "Nonlinear field-control of terahertz waves in random media for spatiotemporal focusing". http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19096859 57 .
This project contains the following underlying data, organised by folder:
- Figure 2/
-
○
mat/ (folder containing raw datasets (in .fig and .mat formats) for each panel in Figure 2)
- Figure 3/
-
○
mat/ (folder containing raw datasets (in .mat format) for each panel in Figure 3)
- Figure 4/
-
○
mat/ (folder containing raw datasets (in .fig and .mat formats) for each panel in Figure 4)
- Figure 5/
-
○
mat/ (folder containing raw datasets (in .fig and .mat formats) for each panel in Figure 5)
Extended data
Figshare: Figure data for "Nonlinear field-control of terahertz waves in random media for spatiotemporal focusing". http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19096859 57 .
This project contains the following extended data, organised by folder:
- Figure 2/
-
○
make_f2.m (MATLAB script that reads and processes the raw data and plots the figure)
-
○
make_f2_octave.m (Octave script that reads and processes the raw data and plots the figure)
- Figure 3/
-
○
make_f3.m (MATLAB script that reads and processes the raw data and plots the figure)
-
○
make_f3_octave.m (Octave script that reads and processes the raw data and plots the figure)
- Figure 4/
-
○
make_f4.m (MATLAB script that reads and processes the raw data and plots the figure)
-
○
make_f4_octave.m (Octave script that reads and processes the raw data and plots the figure)
- Figure 5/
-
○
make_f5.m (MATLAB script that reads and processes the raw data and plots the figure)
-
○
make_f5_octave.m (Octave script that reads and processes the raw data and plots the figure)
- simulation_codes_octave/
-
○
Main_costfunction_A.m (simulation code with cost function A from Table 1)
-
○
Main_costfunction_B.m (simulation code with cost function B from Table 1)
-
○
Main_costfunction_C.m (simulation code with cost function C from Table 1)
-
○
Main_costfunction_D.m (simulation code with cost function D from Table 1)
-
○
rsgeng1D.m (function to generate gaussian-correlated 1D data)
-
○
TM_f.m (function to generate a frequency-correlated transmission matrix)
-
○
fwhm.m (function to estimate the FWHM of a temporal pulse profile)
-
○
compute_moment.m (function to calculate the statistical moments of temporal pulse profiles)
-
○
spectr.m (function to calculate the Fourier spectrum of a temporal field profile)
-
○
erdc_fireice_h.m (utility function for customised colormap)
-
○
fireice.m (utility function for customised colormap)
Data and simulation codes are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0).
Ethics and consent
Ethical approval and consent were not required.
Funding Statement
This project has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement No 725046). JSTG acknowledges support from The Leverhulme Trust (Leverhulme Early Career Fellowship ECF-2020-537).
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
References
- 1. Badon A, Boccara AC, Lerosey G, et al. : Multiple scattering limit in optical microscopy. Opt Express. 2017;25(23):28914–28934. 10.1364/OE.25.028914 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Kelsall D: Optical “seeing” through the atmosphere by an interferometric technique*. JOSA. 1973;63(11):1472–1484. 10.1364/JOSA.63.001472 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Muller RA, Buffington A: Real-time correction of atmospherically degraded telescope images through image sharpening. JOSA. 1974;64(9):1200–1210. 10.1364/JOSA.64.001200 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Liu Y, Chen L, Liu W, et al. : Resolution-enhanced imaging through scattering media by high-order correlation. Appl Opt. 2019;58(9):2350–2357. 10.1364/AO.58.002350 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Hampson KM, Turcotte R, Miller DT, et al. : Adaptive optics for high-resolution imaging. Nat Rev Methods Primers. 2021;1:68. 10.1038/s43586-021-00066-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Vellekoop IM, Lagendijk A, Mosk AP: Exploiting disorder for perfect focusing. Nat Photon. 2010;4:320–322. 10.1038/nphoton.2010.3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Waves and Imaging through Complex Media.2001. 10.1007/978-94-010-0975-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Goodman PJ: Speckle Phenomena in Optics.2010. [Google Scholar]
- 9. Bertolotti J, van Putten EG, Blum C, et al. : Non-invasive imaging through opaque scattering layers. Nature. 2012;491(7423):232–234. 10.1038/nature11578 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Popoff SM, Lerosey G, Carminati R, et al. : Measuring the Transmission Matrix in Optics: An Approach to the Study and Control of Light Propagation in Disordered Media. Phys Rev Lett. 2010;104(10):100601. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.100601 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Tyson RK: Principles of Adaptive Optics, Second Edition.1997. [Google Scholar]
- 12. Shemonski ND, South FA, Liu YZ, et al. : Computational high-resolution optical imaging of the living human retina. Nat Photonics. 2015;9:440–443. 10.1038/nphoton.2015.102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Rueckel M, Mack-Bucher JA, Denk W: Adaptive wavefront correction in two-photon microscopy using coherence-gated wavefront sensing. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2006;103(46):17137–17142. 10.1073/pnas.0604791103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Pierangeli D, Palmieri V, Marcucci G, et al. : Living optical random neural network with three dimensional tumor spheroids for cancer morphodynamics. Commun Phys. 2020;3:160. 10.1038/s42005-020-00428-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Fleming A, Conti C, Falco AD: Perturbation of Transmission Matrices in Nonlinear Random Media. Ann Phys. 2019;531(9):1900091. 10.1002/andp.201900091 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Pierangeli D, Marcucci G, Conti C: Photonic extreme learning machine by free-space optical propagation. Photonics Res. 2021;9(8):1446–1454. 10.1364/PRJ.423531 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Dong J, Gigan S, Krzakala F, et al. : Scaling Up Echo-State Networks With Multiple Light Scattering.In: IEEE Stat Signal Processing Workshop (SSP). 2018;448–452. 10.1109/SSP.2018.8450698 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Dong J, Rafayelyan M, Krzakala F, et al. : Optical Reservoir Computing Using Multiple Light Scattering for Chaotic Systems Prediction. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron. 2020;26(1):1–12. 10.1109/JSTQE.2019.2936281 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Yaqoob Z, Psaltis D, Feld MS, et al. : Optical phase conjugation for turbidity suppression in biological samples. Nat Photonics. 2008;2(2):110–115. 10.1038/nphoton.2007.297 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Cui M, Yang C: Implementation of a digital optical phase conjugation system and its application to study the robustness of turbidity suppression by phase conjugation. Opt Express. 2010;18(4):3444–3455. 10.1364/OE.18.003444 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Katz O, Small E, Bromberg Y, et al. : Focusing and compression of ultrashort pulses through scattering media. Nat Photon. 2011;5:372–377. 10.1038/nphoton.2011.72 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22. van Beijnum F, van Putten EG, Lagendijk A, et al. : Frequency bandwidth of light focused through turbid media. Opt Lett. 2011;36(3):373–375. 10.1364/OL.36.000373 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Mounaix M, Defienne H, Gigan S: Deterministic light focusing in space and time through multiple scattering media with a time-resolved transmission matrix approach. Phys Rev A. 2016;94(4):041802. 10.1103/PhysRevA.94.041802 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Lemoult F, Lerosey G, de Rosny J, et al. : Manipulating Spatiotemporal Degrees of Freedom of Waves in Random Media. Phys Rev Lett. 2009;103(17):173902. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.173902 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Aulbach J, Gjonaj B, Johnson PM, et al. : Control of Light Transmission through Opaque Scattering Media in Space and Time. Phys Rev Lett. 2011;106(10):103901. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.103901 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Webster MA, Gerke TD, Weiner AM, et al. : Spectral and temporal speckle field measurements of a random medium. Opt Lett. 2004;29(13):1491–3. 10.1364/ol.29.001491 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Tal E, Silberberg Y: Transformation from an ultrashort pulse to a spatiotemporal speckle by a thin scattering surface. Opt Lett. 2006;31(23):3529–3531. 10.1364/ol.31.003529 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Johnson PM, Imhof A, Bret BP, et al. : Time-resolved pulse propagation in a strongly scattering material. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2003;68(1 Pt 2):016604. 10.1103/PhysRevE.68.016604 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Bruce NC, Schmidt FE, Dainty JC, et al. : Investigation of the temporal spread of an ultrashort light pulse on transmission through a highly scattering medium. Appl Opt. 1995;34(25):5823–5828. 10.1364/AO.34.005823 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Vellekoop IM, Mosk AP: Focusing coherent light through opaque strongly scattering media. Opt Lett. 2007;32(16):2309–11. 10.1364/ol.32.002309 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Wei X, Shen Y, Jing JC, et al. : Real-time frequency-encoded spatiotemporal focusing through scattering media using a programmable 2D ultrafine optical frequency comb. Sci Adv. 2020;6(8):eaay1192. 10.1126/sciadv.aay1192 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. McCabe DJ, Tajalli A, Austin DR, et al. : Spatio-temporal focusing of an ultrafast pulse through a multiply scattering medium. Nat Commun. 2011;2:447. 10.1038/ncomms1434 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Boniface A, Gusachenko I, Dholakia K, et al. : Rapid broadband characterization of scattering medium using hyperspectral imaging. Optica. 2019;6(3):274–279. 10.1364/OPTICA.6.000274 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34. French R, Gigan S, Muskens OL: Speckle-based hyperspectral imaging combining multiple scattering and compressive sensing in nanowire mats. Opt Lett. 2017;42(9):1820–1823. 10.1364/OL.42.001820 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Andreoli D, Volpe G, Popoff S, et al. : Deterministic control of broadband light through a multiply scattering medium via the multispectral transmission matrix. Sci Rep. 2015;5:10347. 10.1038/srep10347 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Withayachumnankul W, Naftaly M: Fundamentals of Measurement in Terahertz Time-Domain Spectroscopy. J Infrared Millim Terahertz Waves. 2014;35:610–637. 10.1007/s10762-013-0042-z [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Gentilini S, Missori M, Ghofraniha N, et al. : Terahertz Radiation Transport in Photonic Glasses. Ann Phys. 2020;532(8):2000005. 10.1002/andp.202000005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Pearce J, Mittleman DM: Scale model experimentation: using terahertz pulses to study light scattering. Phys Med Biol. 2002;47(21):3823–3830. 10.1088/0031-9155/47/21/321 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Pearce J, Mittleman DM: Using terahertz pulses to study light scattering. Phys B Condens Matter. 2003;338(1–4):92–96. 10.1016/S0921-4526(03)00467-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Pearce J, Mittleman DM: Propagation of single-cycle terahertz pulses in random media. Opt Lett. 2001;26(24):2002–2004. 10.1364/ol.26.002002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Oldfield C, Bowman T, El-Shcnawcc M: Development of Tunable Breast Tissue Phantoms for Terahertz Imaging. In 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting.2018;1397–1398. 10.1109/APUSNCURSINRSM.2018.8608493 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Walker GC, Berry E, Smye SW, et al. : Materials for phantoms for terahertz pulsed imaging. Phys Med Biol. 2004;49(21):N363–N369. 10.1088/0031-9155/49/21/n01 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Vilagosh Z, Lajevardipour A, Wood A: Modelling terahertz radiation absorption and reflection with computational phantoms of skin and associated appendages.2018. 10.1117/12.2283206 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Walker GC, Berry E, Smye SW, et al. : Modelling the propagation of terahertz radiation through a tissue simulating phantom. Phys Med Biol. 2004;49(10):1853–1864. 10.1088/0031-9155/49/10/002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Chau KJ, Elezzabi AY: Terahertz transmission through ensembles of subwavelength-size metallic particles. Phys Rev B. 2005;72(7–15):075110. 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.075110 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Mounaix M, Andreoli D, Defienne H, et al. : Spatiotemporal Coherent Control of Light through a Multiple Scattering Medium with the Multispectral Transmission Matrix. Phys Rev Lett. 2016;116(25):253901. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.253901 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Sadel C: Relations between transfer and scattering matrices in the presence of hyperbolic channels. J Math Phys. 2011;52:123511. 10.1063/1.3669483 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Judkewitz B, Horstmeyer R, Vellekoop IM, et al. : Translation correlations in anisotropically scattering media. Nat Phys. 2015;11:684–689. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
- 49. Arienzo A, Argenti F, Alparone L, et al. : Accurate Despeckling and Estimation of Polarimetric Features by Means of a Spatial Decorrelation of the Noise in Complex PolSAR Data. Remote Sens. 2020;12(2):331. 10.3390/rs12020331 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Bergström D: Surface Generation & Analysis - MySimLabs.2012. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
- 51. Mosk AP, Lagendijk A, Lerosey G, et al. : Controlling waves in space and time for imaging and focusing in complex media. Nat Photon. 2012;6:283–292. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
- 52. Olivieri L, Totero Gongora JS, Pasquazi A, et al. : Time-Resolved Nonlinear Ghost Imaging. ACS Photonics. 2018;5(8):3379–3388. 10.1021/acsphotonics.8b00653 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Olivieri L, Totero Gongora JS, Peters L, et al. : Hyperspectral terahertz microscopy via nonlinear ghost imaging. Optica. 2020;7(2):186–191. 10.1364/OPTICA.381035 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Totero Gongora JS, Olivieri L, Peters L, et al. : Route to Intelligent Imaging Reconstruction via Terahertz Nonlinear Ghost Imaging. Micromachines (Basel). 2020;11(5):521. 10.3390/mi11050521 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Gallot G, Grischkowsky D: Electro-optic detection of terahertz radiation. JOSA B. 1999;16(8):1204–1212. 10.1364/JOSAB.16.001204 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Jin H, Hwang B, Lee S, et al. : Limiting the incident NA for efficient wavefront shaping through thin anisotropic scattering media. Optica. 2021;8(4):428–437. 10.1364/OPTICA.413174 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Totero Gongora JS, Peccianti M, Cecconi V, et al. : Figure data for "Nonlinear field-control of terahertz waves in random media for spatiotemporal focusing". figshare. Dataset.2022. 10.6084/m9.figshare.19096859 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. van Albada MP, van Tiggelen BA, Lagendijk A, et al. : Speed of propagation of classical waves in strongly scattering media. Phys Rev Lett. 1991;66(24):3132–3135. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.3132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Vellekoop IM, Mosk AP: Phase control algorithms for focusing light through turbid media. Opt Commun. 2008;281(11):3071–3080. 10.1016/j.optcom.2008.02.022 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Schilt S, Südmeyer T: Carrier-Envelope Offset Stabilized Ultrafast Diode-Pumped Solid-State Lasers. Appl Sci. 2015;5(4):787–816. 10.3390/app5040787 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Imran T, Lee YS, Nam CH, et al. : Stabilization and control of the carrier-envelope phase of high-power femtosecond laser pulses using the direct locking technique. Opt Express. 2007;15(1):104–112. 10.1364/oe.15.000104 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Okubo S, Onae A, Nakamura K, et al. : Offset-free optical frequency comb self-referencing with an f-2f interferometer. Optica. 2018;5(2):188–192. 10.1364/OPTICA.5.000188 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Papadopoulos IN, Jouhanneau JS, Poulet JFA, et al. : Scattering compensation by focus scanning holographic aberration probing (F-SHARP). Nat Photon. 2017;11:116–123. 10.1038/nphoton.2016.252 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Frazier M, Taddese B, Xiao B, et al. : Nonlinear time reversal of classical waves: Experiment and model. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2013;88(6):062910. 10.1103/PhysRevE.88.062910 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Veli M, Mengu D, Yardimci NT, et al. : Terahertz pulse shaping using diffractive surfaces. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):37. 10.1038/s41467-020-20268-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Li J, Mengu D, Yardimci NT, et al. : Spectrally encoded single-pixel machine vision using diffractive networks. Sci Adv. 2021;7(13):eabd7690. 10.1126/sciadv.abd7690 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Vellekoop IM, Aegerter CM: Scattered light fluorescence microscopy: imaging through turbid layers. Opt Lett. 2010;35(8):1245–1247. 10.1364/OL.35.001245 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]