Skip to main content
National Science Review logoLink to National Science Review
. 2023 Aug 7;10(9):nwad210. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwad210

Spontaneous movement of a retrotransposon generated genic dominant male sterility providing a useful tool for rice breeding

Conghao Xu 1, Yifeng Xu 2, Zhengji Wang 3, Xiaoyu Zhang 4, Yuying Wu 5, Xinyan Lu 6, Hongwei Sun 7, Lei Wang 8, Qinglu Zhang 9, Qinghua Zhang 10, Xianghua Li 11, Jinghua Xiao 12, Xu Li 13, Mingfu Zhao 14, Yidan Ouyang 15,✉, Xianbo Huang 16,✉, Qifa Zhang 17,✉
PMCID: PMC10446136  PMID: 37621414

ABSTRACT

Male sterility in plants provides valuable breeding tools in germplasm innovation and hybrid crop production. However, genetic resources for dominant genic male sterility, which hold great promise to facilitate breeding processes, are extremely rare in natural germplasm. Here we characterized the Sanming Dominant Genic Male Sterility in rice and identified the gene SDGMS using a map-based cloning approach. We found that spontaneous movement of a 1978-bp long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposon into the promoter region of the SDGMS gene activates its expression in anther tapetum, which causes abnormal programmed cell death of tapetal cells resulting in dominant male sterility. SDGMS encodes a ribosome inactivating protein showing N-glycosidase activity. The activation of SDGMS triggers transcription reprogramming of genes responsive to biotic stress leading to a hypersensitive response which causes sterility. The results demonstrate that an ectopic gene activation by transposon movement can give birth to a novel trait which enriches phenotypic diversity with practical utility.

Keywords: Oryza sativa, dominant male sterility, ribosome-inactivating protein, retrotransposon

INTRODUCTION

Male sterility is a widespread phenomenon in the plant kingdom. According to the genetic causes, male sterility can be classified as cytoplasmic male sterility and nuclear (also referred to as genic) male sterility [1]. Cytoplasmic male sterility is caused by mutations of genes in the cytoplasmic genomes, mostly mitochondria, which can be restored by nuclear restorer gene(s). Genic male sterility results from mutations of genes in the nuclear genomes, which may either be genetically recessive or dominant. Although male sterility is unfavourable to plants per se, these genetic resources provide vital breeding tools in hybrid seed production and breeding processes in many crops [2–6]. In the past decades cytoplasmic male sterility and environmentally inducible recessive genic male sterility have been widely exploited for the development of hybrid crops which have greatly boosted global food production [1,7,8]. However, dominant genic male sterility, which may also have the potential to make crucial contributions to both plant science research and crop genetic improvement, has been under explored [9].

Crossing (also referred to as hybridization) is the first and essential procedure in both breeding programs and genetic studies. Hand emasculation is the first step in hybridization of self-pollinating species, which is highly labour-intensive and economically costly especially in large breeding programs. Introduction of dominant genic male sterility can greatly reduce or even eliminate the need for hand emasculation which may revolutionize breeding processes.

However, genetic resources for dominant genic male sterility are extremely rare in natural germplasm, and, so far, only a few cases have been reported in crops [10–12]. In wheat, the insertion of a terminal-repeat retrotransposon in a miniature element in the promoter of Ms2 activates its anther-specific expression and is therefore responsible for sterility in Taigu dominant genic male sterility [13,14]. In rapeseed, the male-sterile allele MS5b acts as a dominant suppressor of the maintainer allele MS5c to induce genic male sterility [15,16]. In maize, a single amino acid change in Ms44 abolishes protein processing and impedes the secretion of protein from tapetal cells into the locule, resulting in dominant male sterility [17]. Due to the lack of natural genetic resources, transgenic technology has also been explored in order to create a dominant male-sterility system by premature expression of ZmMs7 in maize by an anther-specific promoter p5126 [18]. Transgenic dominant male sterile rice was also generated using the barnase gene expressed by the tapetum-specific promoter BoA9 [19].

The Sanming Dominant Genic Male Sterile (SDGMS) Rice was first found in an F2 population of a cross between SE21S and Basmati370 named after the Sanming Institute of Agricultural Science [20]. Male sterility is controlled by a dominant gene that maps to a 99-kb interval on chromosome 8 [21]. This SDGMS line shows stable complete male sterility and practically is not affected by the environment, which is highly useful in breeding. In this study, we identified the SDGMS gene, the first dominant male sterility gene in rice, using a map-based cloning approach. We found that spontaneous movement of a retrotransposon activates SDGMS expression and generates dominant male sterility. Our work demonstrates a mechanism of gene activation which supplies genetic novelty and phenotypic diversity. Our study also provides a promising tool for rice breeding programs.

RESULTS

A naturally occurring dominant genic male sterile mutant

The SDGMS mutant was obtained from an F2 population of a cross between SE21S and Basmati370 (Supplementary Fig. S1a) [20]. Three near-isogenic lines (NILs), 938(SDGMS), ZS97(SDGMS) and NIP(SDGMS), which contained chromosomal segments with the SDGMS gene (in a heterozygous state) from the SDGMS mutant in the genetic background of 938 (a mutant from 93–11), Zhenshan 97 (ZS97) and Nipponbare (NIP), were developed using marker-assisted selection (Supplementary Fig. S1b). All three pairs of NILs grow normally during the vegetative stage; the NILs(SDGMS) showed complete male sterility with small and pale anthers producing no pollen, whereas the NILs(sdgms) showed normal fertility (Supplementary Fig. S2a). In addition, all three NILs could cause stable dominant male sterility when crossed with male-fertile parents, showing a 1:1 segregation ratio of male sterile and fertile plants in the next generation (Supplementary Table S1).

We characterized the cellular abnormality of SDGMS anther development by anther transverse sections. Compared to the wild type, SDGMS anthers had no observable defects before the microspore mother cell stage (MMC). During the meiosis stage, the wild-type tapetal cells and middle-layer cells became thinner and condensed and gradually degenerated before microspore formation (Supplementary Fig. S2b). In contrast, the tapetal cells and middle-layer cells of SDGMS anthers did not undergo degradation and eventually displayed a defective 4-layer anther wall producing no pollen (Supplementary Fig. S2b). These results showed that the abnormal abortion of anther locules was the main cause of male sterility.

A terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labelling (TUNEL) assay showed that in the wild-type anthers, a positive TUNEL signal was detected in tapetal and middle-layer cells during the meiosis stage. The middle layer became invisible after microspore release, and the positive signal of tapetal cells continued before the microspores were formed (Supplementary Fig. S2b). While an abnormally strong TUNEL signal was detected in SDGMS tapetum cells during the early meiosis stage (EM) and disappeared abruptly during the late meiosis stage (LM), no TUNEL signal was observed in middle-layer cells (Supplementary Fig. S2b), suggesting abnormal PCD of tapetal cells. Thus, the SDGMS anthers develop normally at MMC and defects occurred subsequently.

Map-based cloning of SDGMS

To identify the gene responsible for the dominant male sterility, we planted a large BC7F1 population (8241 individuals) from 938(SDGMS) and mapped the SDGMS locus to a 53-kb region that contains 11 predicted genes in the NIP genome (http://rice.uga.edu/) (Fig. 1a). Because of complex variation in this genomic region, we constructed a bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) library of genomic DNA from 938(SDGMS), consisting of 36 480 clones with an average DNA insert size of 110 kb. The library was screened with the markers xch43, xch7 and xch95. Two overlapping BAC clones covering the target genomic region, 62-H-5 with the sdgms genotype and 9-B-10 with the SDGMS genotype, were obtained, and their nucleotide sequences were determined using PCR and sequencing (Fig. 1a). We analyzed the sequence variation in this region and identified a 67.6-kb deletion in 62-H-5 relative to 9-B-10 (Fig. 1b). Sequence comparison of 9-B-10 with the reference genomes of NIP and ZS97 showed that 9-B-10 has an almost identical sequence to the ZS97 genome in this region except a 1978-bp insertion upstream of a predicted gene (hereafter referred to as sdgms) (Fig. 1b). The NIP genome was 27.7-kb shorter relative to ZS97 in this region containing the same predicted gene without the 1978-kb insertion. An analysis of 330 varieties, including 171 indica accessions, 43 Aus accessions, 89 japonica accessions and 27 other types, using a molecular marker, showed that none of the rice varieties had the 1978-bp DNA insertion (Supplementary Table S2).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Map-based cloning and functional analysis of SDGMS. (a) Mapping of SDGMS to a 53.3-kb region on chromosome 8 (chr. 8). The distances are based on the NIP genome sequence. BAC indicates the location of two BAC clones, the dashed line indicates the 67.6-kb deletion. The horizontal lines indicate fragments of chromosome 8. The markers used for map-based cloning are indicated above the horizontal lines. (b) Comparative sequence analysis of genomic fragments between SDGMS and sdgms genotypes. Annotated genes in the mapping region are based on ZS97 genome (http://rice.hzau.edu.cn/rice_rs2/). The tip of the pentagon indicates the 3’ end of the genes. The orange colour pentagons indicate the sdgms and the green triangle indicates the 1978-bp insertion. In the diagram at lower right corner, the orange colour indicates the exon, and the light yellow colour indicates the intron of sdgms. The dark green indicates long terminal repeat (LTR) and TSD indicates the target site duplications (5-bp, CTTCT). (c) Whole plants, panicles, anthers and pollen grains stained with I2-KI of the wild-type and SDGMS-N positive plants at the maturity stage. Scale bar for plants = 10 cm, scale bar for panicles = 5 cm, scale bar for anther = 2 mm, scale bar for pollen grains = 50 μm. (d) Whole plants, panicles, anther and pollen grains stained with I2-KI of the wild-type and SDGMS-OE positive plants at the maturity stage. Scale bar for plants = 10 cm, scale bar for panicles = 5 cm, scale bar for anthers = 2 mm, scale bar for pollen grains = 50 μm. (e) Anthers and pollen grains of different versions of SDGMSkomutants stained with I2-KI. The scale bar for anthers = 2 mm and the scale bar for pollen grains = 50 μm. (See online supplementary material for a colour version of this figure.)

To determine whether the 1978-bp DNA insertion is the cause of the dominant genic male sterility, a transformation construct SDGMS-N of the sdgms gene driven by its native promoter was prepared by PCR amplification of an 8677-bp genomic DNA fragment containing the 1978-bp insertion and 2170-bp upstream region, the 2294 bp gene body (exons and introns) and the 2140-bp 3’region (Supplementary Fig. S3a). The construct was introduced into the NIP variety, producing 25 independent T0 plants. All 17 T0 transgene-positive plants showed very low spikelet fertility (average 13.5%), whereas spikelet fertility of the 8 transgene-negative plants was much higher (average 65.3%) (Supplementary Table S3). Analysis of two independent T1 families from seeds of the transgene-positive T0 plants showed that the negative segregants had nearly normal spikelet fertility (70.6% and 64.9%), while very low fertility was observed in the positive segregants (9.7% and 9.6%) (Fig. 1c and Supplementary Table S3). Two independent T0 plants that were completely male sterile were used as the female parents to cross with the wild-type parent NIP to produce BC1 plants. The average spikelet fertility of the transgene-positive plants was 2.9% and 5.7%, respectively, whereas the negative segregants produced fertility of 70.7% and 62.1% (Supplementary Table S3). This result suggested that the introduced fragment containing the promoter sequence with the 1978-bp insertion and sdgms gene caused the dominant male sterility phenotype.

We next constructed SDGMS-OE, which contains the 7377-bp genomic DNA fragment with the 1978-bp insertion and the SDGMS/sdgms gene driven by the maize ubiquitin promoter, into the NIP variety (Supplementary Fig. S3a). All 26 positive T0 plants showed complete male sterility, producing no pollen in the anthers (Fig. 1d and Supplementary Table S3). Three independent T0 plants, all highly male sterile, were chosen to cross with wild-type NIP. In all the three BC1 populations, negative plants exhibited normal spikelet fertility (67.9%, 67.4% and 69.0%), whereas positive plants showed male sterility with zero spikelet fertility (Supplementary Table S3).

Furthermore, we generated knockout mutants of the SDGMS gene using CRISPR/Cas9 in ZS97(SDGMS) (Supplementary Fig. S3b). Three SDGMSko T0 plants with the deletions in the start codon (ATG) of the SDGMS gene recovered the fertility (67.4%, 71.7%, 62.3%), whereas the mutations upstream of the start codon of the SDGMS gene did not affect fertility (Fig. 1e and Supplementary Table S3). Three fertile T0 plants were chosen to observe the spikelet fertility of T1 families, and there was no significant difference in fertility between SDGMSko and sdgms segregants (Supplementary Table S3). We also crossed the sterile T0 plants with the wild-type parent ZS97, the fertility of the resulting BC1 plants segregated as fertile (82.8%) and sterile (0.6%) groups at a 1:1 ratio (Supplementary Table S3).

We also prepared a sdgms-OE construct, which contains the sdgms gene body driven by the ubiquitin promoter, and introduced into the NIP variety (Supplementary Fig. S3a). Although enhanced expression of the sdgms gene was detected in the transgenic plants (Supplementary Fig. S4), no significant fertility reduction of the transgene-positive plants was observed relative to the negative plants (Supplementary Table S3). We compared the transcript levels of SDGMS/sdgms in the spikelets of SDGMS-OE and sdgms-OE plants at the meiotic stage. The relative expression level of SDGMS/sdgms in independent T1 lines of SDGMS-OE was much higher than that of sdgms-OE plants (Supplementary Fig. S4), suggesting that ubiquitin promoter without the 1987-bp insertion could not drive the sdgms to an adequate level to produce male sterility.

Taken together, the transformation results suggested that the whole complement, including the SDGMS/sdgms coding sequence, the 1978-bp insert and the full-length promoter (or the genomic location), is necessary for SDGMS in its native setting. Less than optimal length of the promoter (or not the right genomic location) would produce less than complete male sterility, like the case of SDGMS-N. Ubiquitin promoter could partly compensate for the insufficiency in the promoter leading to complete sterility (SDGMS-OE); but without the 1978-bp insert (sdgms-OE) it is not sufficient to produce male sterility presumably because of inability to achieve the peak expression level in the specific tissue required for male sterility.

The 1978-bp DNA insertion activates SDGMS expression

To explore the origin and function of the 1978-bp DNA insertion, we conducted a BLAST search in NCBI using the insertion sequence. The results showed that homologous sequences exist widely in different rice genomes, and the best hit (1973-bp, identity 100%) was located on chromosome 2 of ZS97. In view of the pedigree of Sanming-dominant genic male sterility in which ZS97 was one of the parents, the 1978-bp DNA insertion may have been derived from ZS97 (Supplementary Fig. S1a). Using this 1978-bp DNA fragment as the query to search the giriREPBASE database (https://www.girinst.org), it displays the typical structure of the long terminal-repeat (LTR) retrotransposon, which contains two identical LTR sequences (497-bp each) and two identical target site duplications (5-bp each, CTTCT) (Fig. 1b).

Based on rapid amplification of the cDNA ends (RACE), the coding sequences and 3’UTRs of SDGMS from 938(SDGMS) and sdgms from ZS97 were identical, and the 5’UTRs were 239-bp and 368-bp upstream of the start codon (ATG), respectively. The 1978-bp retrotransposon is inserted 94-bp upstream of the start codon of SDGMS and thus does not change its protein coding sequence (Supplementary Fig. S3c).

To investigate the expression profile of SDGMS/sdgms, we searched the plant public RNA-seq Database (http://ipf.sustech.edu.cn/pub/plantrna/?lngdjecbaiecjecj) [22]. SDGMS/sdgms was not expressed in most tissues of diverse varieties and barely detectable only in young panicles and spikelets of some varieties (Supplementary Fig. S5). We also analyzed the transcript levels of SDGMS/sdgms in various tissues of the NILs. The transcript was not detectable in vegetative tissues such as shoots of 4-leaf stage seedlings, leaves at the tillering stage, and palea and lemma before flowering. The expression level was very low in the young panicle and spikelet of fertile plants 938(sdgms) and ZS97(sdgms), but became abundant in the young panicle (stage 5) and spikelet (stages 6–7) of sterile plants 938(SDGMS) and ZS97(SDGMS) (Fig. 2a). RNA in situ hybridization revealed that SDGMS was specifically expressed in the tapetum of anthers from ZS97(SDGMS) at the EM stage, whereas no obvious signal was detected in ZS97(sdgms) anthers at this stage (Supplementary Fig. S6). This expression pattern is in accordance with the strong abnormal PCD signal detected in 938(SDGMS) at the EM stage, which is also supported by the real-time PCR and RNA-seq data showing that SDGMS is highly expressed at the meiotic stage. These results indicate that the dominant male sterility resulted from the acquired expression of SDGMS; the insertion of the 1978-bp retrotransposon boosts expression of SDGMS in the tapetum cells during male gamete development resulting in male sterility.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Upregulated expression of SDGMS by insertion of a 1978-bp retrotransposon. (a) Relative expression levels of SDGMS in young panicles and spikelets of 938(SDGMS) and 938(sdgms) (left) and ZS97(SDGMS) and ZS97(sdgms) (right). Stage 5, young panicles at the microspore mother cell stage. Stage 6, spikelet at meiotic stage. Stage 7, spikelet at microspore stage. Stage 8, spikelets at the mature pollen stage. (b) Left, diagrams of reporter vectors containing the upstream sequence of the sdgms or SDGMS gene using the dual luciferase assay. Right, dual luciferase assay. Different letters indicate significant differences ranked by the LSD test (P < 0.01).

We used the dual luciferase reporter system to assess the effect of the 1978-bp retrotransposon on gene expression. The native promoter of the sdgms gene (2170-bp upstream sequence of sdgms), the native promoter of SDGMS containing the retrotransposon (2170-bp upstream sequence plus 1978-bp retrotransposon), and the retrotransposon alone (1978-bp) were used to drive the expression of the coding sequence of firefly luciferase in rice protoplasts (Fig. 2b). The results showed that the 1978-bp retrotransposon alone produced significantly higher firefly luciferase activity than the native promoter of sdgms, and the native promoter of SDGMS containing the 1978-bp retrotransposon could further increase the activity of firefly luciferase (Fig. 2b). Thus, the 1978-bp retrotransposon could both prime and enhance the expression of SDGMS.

The SDGMS/sdgms gene encodes a ribosome inactivating protein

The predicted SDGMS/sdgms protein was 285 amino acids in length and annotated as a ribosome inactivating protein (IPR110574) by InterPro (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro/). No signal peptide was identified by SignalP 5.0 (https://services.healthtech.dtu.dk/service.php?SignalP-5.0).

Ribosome inactivating proteins are classified as RNA N-glycosidases that catalyze the depurination of adenine in the conserved α-sarcin/ricin loop (α-SRL) of the 28S/25S/23S rRNA [23,24]. To assess whether SDGMS/sdgms encodes a ribosome inactivating protein, we obtained SDGMS/sdgms protein by expressing its coding sequence in Escherichia coli. An in vitro protease assay showed that it depurinated and cleaved the N-glycosidic bond of A30-ssDNA, which mimicked the α-sarcin/ricin loop, and released adenine (Fig. 3a). Expression of SDGMS/sdgms protein in E. coli induced by isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) impeded E. coli growth (Fig. 3b). The SDGMS/sdgms protein exhibited N-glycosidase activity on RNA as evidenced by the released adenine after incubation with rice total RNA (Fig. 3c); SDGMS/sdgms inhibited protein translation in vivo, as indicated by its inhibition of luciferase expression at the translation level but not at the transcription level in rice protoplasts (Fig. 3d). We further investigated the key catalytic residues of SDGMS by mutating the four RIP conserved residues (Tyr100, Glu198, Arg201 and Phe236) of SDGMS to alanine. Expressing each of the four catalytic site-mutated variants of SDGMS had no effect on the growth of E. coli (Fig. 3b), and the mutated form of Tyr100 (SDGMSM1) and Glu198 (SDGMSM2) failed to depurinate and cut the N-glycosidic bond of an A30-ssDNA (Fig. 3a). These results demonstrated that the SDGMS/sdgms-encoded protein possesses N-glycosidase activity and is indeed a ribosome-inactivating protein, and the catalytic residues are necessary for N-glycosidase activity and cytotoxicity to E. coli.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

N-glycosidase activity of SDGMS and catalytic site-mutated SDGMS protein. (a) A30-ssDNA is incubated with SDGMS, SDGMSM1 and SDGMSM2 proteins at 37°C for 8 hours and is separated by thin layer chromatography. The arrow indicates the released adenine. SDGMSM1 (Tyr100 to alanine) and SDGMSM2 (Glu198 to alanine) are catalytic site-mutated forms of SDGMS. (b) Influence of SDGMS and catalytic site-mutated SDGMS expression on E. coli growth. Induced expression of the SDGMS protein hinders the growth of E. coli and is cytotoxic to bacteria, while the mutated form of SDGMS has no effect on the growth of E. coli. SDGMSM3 (Arg201 to alanine) and SDGMSM4 (Phe236 to alanine) are catalytic site-mutated forms of SDGMS. IPTG indicates induced protein expression by IPTG. (c) Rice total RNA was incubated with or without (CK) SDGMS protein at 37°C for 60 min, and the concentration of released adenine was detected by fluorescence. (d) SDGMS protein inhibits LUC protein translation but not transcription in rice protoplasts. The two constructs were co-transformed to rice protoplast and the transcription and translation products were measured after 16 h incubation. Upper, relative transcription level of LUC. Middle, luminance of LUC protein. Lower, the ratio of luminance of LUC protein to relative transcription level of LUC. The illustrations under the histograms indicate the vectors used in rice protoplast transformation.

SDGMS activates defence response in anther disrupting pollen development

To investigate the possible mechanism of male sterility caused by SDGMS, we collected young panicles of 938(SDGMS) and 938(sdgms) at MMC (microspore mother cell) and spikelets at EM (early meiotic), LM (late meiotic) and MP (mature pollen) stages, and identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs) using RNA-Seq transcriptome analysis. A total of 22, 236, 3318 and 4694 DEGs were detected at MMC, EM, LM and MP, respectively, of which 14, 177, 1008 and 686 genes were upregulated at these stages, and 8, 59, 2310 and 4008 genes were downregulated (Supplementary Fig. S7a and Supplementary Table S4).

We checked the key genes regulating tapetal PCD as reported in rice [25]. The expression of UDT1, OsGAMYB, bHLH142, TDR, EAT1, PTC1, DTC1, OsC6, OsAP25, OsAP37 and OsCP1 was downregulated in 938(SDGMS) at LM, during which the fertile anther tapetal cells undergo intense PCD (Supplementary Fig. S7b). This was consistent with the results of the TUNEL assay showing abnormal PCD of tapetal cells of SDGMS anthers.

We performed Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analyses to classify the DEGs at the EM and LM stages. GO analysis of upregulated genes at EM revealed that GO terms related to regulation of gene expression and translation were significantly enriched [false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05], such as gene expression (GO:0 010 467), amino acid activation (GO:0 043 038) and tRNA aminoacylation for protein translation (GO:0 006 418), which may be caused by the protein translation inhibition of SDGMS. Response to biotic stimulus (GO:0 009 607) was also enriched at EM. No GO term was enriched in downregulated genes at EM (Supplementary Table S5).

At LM, GO analysis indicated that upregulated genes were enriched for 53 biological processes, including regulation of gene expression (GO:0 010 468), posttranslational protein modification (GO:0 043 687), response to stimulus (GO:0 050 896) and programmed cell death (GO:0 012 501) (Supplementary Fig. S7c and Supplementary Table S5). GO terms associated with the ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process (GO:0 006 511) and lipid metabolic process (GO:0 006 629) were enriched in downregulated genes at LM (Supplementary Fig. S7c and Supplementary Table S5).

In particular, among the upregulated DEGs, all the 30 genes in the GO term programmed cell death (GO:0 012 501) were annotated as NB-ARC or NB-LRR. The GO term protein amino acid phosphorylation (GO:0 006 468) included 108 genes, 48 associated with receptor-like protein kinase were enriched. Of the 84 genes in the GO term transcription regulation (GO:0 045 449), 21 were WRKYs (Supplementary Table S6). Furthermore, 20 and 23 pathogenesis-related (PR) genes (total 113 in the rice genome) were upregulated at EM and LM, respectively (Supplementary Table S7).

MAPMAN analysis of DEGs at LM obtained similar results to the GO analysis. Genes related to biotic stress, including R genes, PR genes and WRKYs, were upregulated; and conversely, genes involved in ubiquitin-dependent degradation were downregulated (Fig. 4a and b and Supplementary Table S8). Thus, both the MAPMAN and GO results showed that transcription was reprogrammed in 938(SDGMS) spikelets relative to 938(sdgms); and the genes related to response to biotic stress were induced.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

SDGMS activates defence response in anther. (a) Differentially expressed genes related to biotic stress. Each row indicates a differentially expressed gene. The colour of the row represents the expression level of differentially expressed genes based on the log2-fold change. Red rows represent upregulation and blue rows represent downregulation. (b) Differentially expressed genes related to protein degradation. (c) Disease symptoms, lesion length and relative fungal amount of NIP, SDGMS-OE and sdgms-OE leaves after inoculation with M. oryzae RB22. Scale bar = 0.5 cm.

NLRs play a key role in recognizing pathogen effectors and activating effector-triggered immunity (ETI); however, overaccumulated NLRs could be harmful to plant growth and development [26–30]. E3 ubiquitin ligases are reported to suppress the NLR-induced immune response to avoid autoimmunity [31,32], downregulation of the genes related to ubiquitin-dependent degradation may hamper this activity. Therefore, we hypothesized that the ribosome-inactivating protein SDGMS/sdgms may have the function for biotic stress response [24,33]. To test this hypothesis, we inoculated leaves of NIP, SDGMS-OE and sdgms-OE plants with blast fungus at the tillering stage. The results showed that overexpression of SDGMS/sdgms in rice could enhance resistance to M. oryzae RB22 as measured by the length of disease lesions and the relative amount of fungal pathogen (Fig. 4c). Therefore, we speculate that the expression of SDGMS specifically activates the defence pathway in anthers and triggers the hypersensitive response in tapetal cells.

DISCUSSION

Based on the results of our work, we propose a model for the origin and function of the SDGMS. A 1978-bp LTR retrotransposon was accidentally activated and transposed from the genomic region on chromosome 2 of ZS97 to the promoter region of SDGMS during the breeding process, which activated the expression of SDGMS in anther by serving both as a primer and enhancer (Fig. 5). SDGMS/sdgms encodes a ribosome inactivating protein having N-glycosidase activity on RNA and thus may result in irreversible modification of the target A residue, which blocks the activity of elongation factor (EF)-1- and EF-2-dependent GTPase and renders the ribosome unable to bind EF-2, thereby repressing translation [23,24,34,35]. This process consequently causes endogenous biotic stress, thus triggering the hypersensitive response, leading to abnormal PCD of tapetal cells resulting in abortion of the anther locule.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

A working model of dominant male sterility caused by SDGMS. The red colour indicates an upregulation response involved in the sterility process, and blue indicates a downregulation response.

An interesting observation was that expression of sdgms was lightly upregulated in the anther of a sterile mel1 mutant, a mutant of a germ cell-specific AGO protein MEL1 that causes irregularly sized, multinucleated, and vacuolated pollen mother cells in developing anthers via 21-nt phasiRNA-mediated gene silencing [36–39]. By comparison, the expression of sdgms remained very low in other male sterility mutants, such as eat1, msp1, ostdl1, dcl3b, osmyb80 and ago18 (Supplementary Fig. S8). Therefore, it is likely that MEL1 could suppress the expression level of sdgms to ensure the normal development of anther, whereas the insertion of the 1978-bp retrotransposon altered the transcription of SDGMS that could have been suppressed by MEL1.

The demonstration of an LTR retrotransposon insertion in the promoter region of a ribosome-inactivation protein giving birth to a gene for stable dominant male sterility in rice provides a fresh example that TE movement is an ongoing process in genome evolution. Such a process can create novel traits with practical utility contributing to genic diversity and phenotypic novelty.

The SDGMS rice provides a very powerful tool to facilitate outcrossing, which can be explored in many ways for diverse breeding programs. This includes, but is not limited to: (1) precise introgressing of a desired allele of a gene for an agronomic trait by successive backcrosses for rapid directional improvement of elite cultivars [40]; (2) random introgressing of genomic segments from doner lines by backcrosses to produce near isogenic introgressed lines (NIILs) to broaden the genetic basis of the breeding parents [41]; (3) recurrent selection for cyclic population improvement involving a large number of parental lines in a single breeding program, which may simultaneously improve multiple traits, such as better nutrition use efficiency, higher resistance to stress, and high yield potential and quality. Moreover, using any of the male sterile lines presented in this study as the starting point, dominant male sterile lines can be developed for any breeding parents thus eliminating the need for hand emasculation, which will fundamentally improve the efficiency of breeding programs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Detailed materials and methods are available in the supplementary information.

Supplementary Material

nwad210_Supplemental_Files

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

RNA-seq analyses in this paper were run on the bioinformatics computing platform of the National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University.

Contributor Information

Conghao Xu, National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement and National Centre of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan), Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.

Yifeng Xu, Ningde Inspection and Testing Centre for Agricultural Product Quality and Safety, Ningde 352100, China.

Zhengji Wang, National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement and National Centre of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan), Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.

Xiaoyu Zhang, National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement and National Centre of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan), Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.

Yuying Wu, National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement and National Centre of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan), Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.

Xinyan Lu, National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement and National Centre of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan), Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.

Hongwei Sun, National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement and National Centre of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan), Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.

Lei Wang, National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement and National Centre of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan), Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.

Qinglu Zhang, National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement and National Centre of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan), Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.

Qinghua Zhang, National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement and National Centre of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan), Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.

Xianghua Li, National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement and National Centre of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan), Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.

Jinghua Xiao, National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement and National Centre of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan), Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.

Xu Li, National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement and National Centre of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan), Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.

Mingfu Zhao, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou 350018, China.

Yidan Ouyang, National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement and National Centre of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan), Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.

Xianbo Huang, Sanming Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Shaxian 365509, China.

Qifa Zhang, National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement and National Centre of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan), Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.

FUNDING

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31991223, 91940301, 31991222 and 31821005), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFF1002100), the Hubei Key R&D Program in Hongshan Lab (2021hszd005 and 2022hszd017) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2662023PY002).

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Qifa Zhang and Y.O. conceived and designed the experiment; C.X. and Y.X. constructed the NILs and performed map-based cloning; C.X. and Z.W. analyzed the data; C.X., X.Z., Y.W., X.L., H.S. and L.W. performed the experiment; Qinghua Zhang constructed the RNA-seq libraries; Qinglu Zhang and X.L. contributed to the fieldwork; X.L., J.X. and M.Z. contributed reagents and materials; X-B.H. provided the male sterile line. Y.O., Qifa Zhang and C.X. wrote the paper.

Conflict of interest statement. A patent was filed based on this work.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Chen L, Liu Y-G. Male sterility and fertility restoration in crops. Annu Rev Plant Biol 2014; 65: 579–606. 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-040119 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Jiang H, Lu Q, Qiu Set al. Fujian cytoplasmic male sterility and the fertility restorer gene OsRf19 provide a promising breeding system for hybrid rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2022; 119: e2208759119. 10.1073/pnas.2208759119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Fan Y, Yang J, Mathioni SM. et al. PMS1T, producing phased small-interfering RNAs, regulates photoperiod-sensitive male sterility in rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2016; 113: 15144–9. 10.1073/pnas.1619159114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Ding J, Lu Q, Ouyang Yet al. A long noncoding RNA regulates photoperiod-sensitive male sterility, an essential component of hybrid rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 109: 2654–9. 10.1073/pnas.1121374109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Xiao S, Zang J, Pei Yet al. Activation of mitochondrial orf355 gene expression by a nuclear-encoded DREB transcription factor causes cytoplasmic male sterility in maize. Mol Plant 2020; 13: 1270–83. 10.1016/j.molp.2020.07.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Ding J, Shen J, Mao Het al. RNA-directed DNA methylation is involved in regulating photoperiod-sensitive male sterility in rice. Mol Plant 2012; 5: 1210–6. 10.1093/mp/sss095 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Fan Y, Zhang Q. Genetic and molecular characterization of photoperiod and thermo-sensitive male sterility in rice. Plant Reprod 2018; 31: 3–14. 10.1007/s00497-017-0310-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Kim Y-J, Zhang D. Molecular control of male fertility for crop hybrid breeding. Trends Plant Sci 2018; 23: 53–65. 10.1016/j.tplants.2017.10.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Wan X, Wu S, Li X. Breeding with dominant genic male-sterility genes to boost crop grain yield in the post-heterosis utilization era. Mol Plant 2021; 14: 531–4. 10.1016/j.molp.2021.02.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Song L-Q, Fu T-D, Tu J-Xet al. Molecular validation of multiple allele inheritance for dominant genic male sterility gene in Brassica napus L. Theor Appl Genet 2006; 113: 55–62. 10.1007/s00122-006-0271-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Liang J, Ma Y, Wu Jet al. Map-based cloning of the dominant genic male sterile Ms-cd1 gene in cabbage (Brassica oleracea). Theor Appl Genet 2017; 130: 71–9. 10.1007/s00122-016-2792-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Cheng X-Q, Zhang X-Y, Xue Fet al. Characterization and transcriptome analysis of a dominant genic male sterile cotton mutant. BMC Plant Biol 2020; 20: 312. 10.1186/s12870-020-02522-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Liu J, Xia C, Dong Het al. Wheat male-sterile 2 reduces ROS levels to inhibit anther development by deactivating ROS modulator 1. Mol Plant 2022; 15: 1428–39. 10.1016/j.molp.2022.07.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Xia C, Zhang L, Zou Cet al. A TRIM insertion in the promoter of Ms2 causes male sterility in wheat. Nat Commun 2017; 8: 15407. 10.1038/ncomms15407 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Xin Q, Shen Y, Li X. et al. MS5 mediates early meiotic progression and its natural variants may have applications for hybrid production in Brassica napus. Plant Cell 2016; 28: 1263–78. 10.1105/tpc.15.01018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Xin Q, Wang X, Gao Yet al. Molecular mechanisms underpinning the multiallelic inheritance of MS5 in Brassica napus. Plant J 2020; 103: 1723–34. 10.1111/tpj.14857 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Fox T, DeBruin J, Collet KHet al. A single point mutation in Ms44 results in dominant male sterility and improves nitrogen use efficiency in maize. Plant Biotechnol J 2017; 15: 942–52. 10.1111/pbi.12689 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. An X, Ma B, Duan Met al. Molecular regulation of ZmMs7 required for maize male fertility and development of a dominant male-sterility system in multiple species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2020; 117: 23499–509. 10.1073/pnas.2010255117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Abe K, Oshima M, Akasaka Met al. Development and characterization of transgenic dominant male sterile rice toward an outcross-based breeding system. Breed Sci 2018; 68: 248–57. 10.1270/jsbbs.17090 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Huang X-B, Tian Z-H, Deng Z-Qet al. Preliminary identification of a novel sanming dominant male sterile gene in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Acta Agron Sin 2009; 34: 1865–8. 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.01865 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Yang Z-M, Xie X-F, Huang X-Bet al. Mapping of Sanming dominant genic male sterility gene in rice. Hereditas 2012; 34: 615–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Yu Y, Zhang H, Long Yet al. Plant Public RNA-seq Database: a comprehensive online database for expression analysis of ∼45 000 plant public RNA-Seq libraries. Plant Biotechnol J 2022; 20: 806–8. 10.1111/pbi.13798 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Endo Y, Tsurugi K. RNA N-glycosidase activity of ricin A-chain. Mechanism of action of the toxic lectin ricin on eukaryotic ribosomes. J Biol Chem 1987; 262: 8128–30. 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)47538-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Nielsen K, Boston RS. Ribosome-inactivating proteins: a plant perspective. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 2001; 52: 785–816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Daneva A, Gao Z, Van Durme Met al. Functions and regulation of programmed cell death in plant development. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2016; 32: 441–68. 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-111315-124915 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Remick BC, Gaidt MM, Vance RE. Effector-triggered immunity. Annu Rev Immunol 2023; 41: 453–81. 10.1146/annurev-immunol-101721-031732 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Bi G, Zhou J-M. Regulation of cell death and signaling by pore-forming resistosomes. Annu Rev Phytopathol 2021; 59: 239–63. 10.1146/annurev-phyto-020620-095952 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Cui H, Tsuda K, Parker JE. Effector-triggered immunity: from pathogen perception to robust defense. Annu Rev Plant Biol 2015; 66: 487–511. 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-040012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Monteiro F, Nishimura MT. Structural, functional, and genomic diversity of plant NLR proteins: an evolved resource for rational engineering of plant immunity. Annu Rev Phytopathol 2018; 56: 243–67. 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080417-045817 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Greenberg JT, Yao N. The role and regulation of programmed cell death in plant-pathogen interactions. Cell Microbiol 2004; 6: 201–11. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2004.00361.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. You Q, Zhai K, Yang Det al. An E3 ubiquitin ligase-BAG protein module controls plant innate immunity and broad-spectrum disease resistance. Cell Host Microbe 2016; 20: 758–69. 10.1016/j.chom.2016.10.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Wu Z, Tong M, Tian Let al. Plant E3 ligases SNIPER1 and SNIPER2 broadly regulate the homeostasis of sensor NLR immune receptors. EMBO J 2020; 39: e104915. 10.15252/embj.2020104915 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Reinbothe S, Reinbothe C, Lehmann Jet al. JIP60, a methyl jasmonate-induced ribosome-inactivating protein involved in plant stress reactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994; 91: 7012–6. 10.1073/pnas.91.15.7012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Nilsson L, Asano K, Svensson Bet al. Reduced turnover of the elongation factor EF-1 X ribosome complex after treatment with the protein synthesis inhibitor II from barley seeds. Biochim Biophys Acta 1986; 868: 62–70. 10.1016/0167-4781(86)90087-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Montanaro L, Sperti S, Mattioli Aet al. Inhibition by ricin of protein synthesis in vitro. inhibition of the binding of elongation factor 2 and of adenosine diphosphate-ribosylated elongation factor 2 to ribosomes. Biochem J 1975; 146: 127–31. 10.1042/bj1460127 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Ono S, Liu H, Tsuda K. et al. EAT1 transcription factor, a non-cell-autonomous regulator of pollen production, activates meiotic small RNA biogenesis in rice anther tapetum. PLoS Genet 2018; 14: e1007238. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007238 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Komiya R, Ohyanagi H, Niihama Met al. Rice germline-specific argonaute MEL1 protein binds to phasiRNAs generated from more than 700 lincRNAs. Plant J 2014; 78: 385–97. 10.1111/tpj.12483 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Nonomura K-I, Morohoshi A, Nakano Met al. A germ cell specific gene of the ARGONAUTE family is essential for the progression of premeiotic mitosis and meiosis during sporogenesis in rice. Plant Cell 2007; 19: 2583–94. 10.1105/tpc.107.053199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Jiang P, Lian B, Liu Cet al. 21-nt phasiRNAs direct target mRNA cleavage in rice male germ cells. Nat Commun 2020; 11: 5191. 10.1038/s41467-020-19034-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Wing RA, Purugganan MD, Zhang Q. The rice genome revolution: from an ancient grain to Green Super Rice. Nat Rev Genet 2018; 19: 505–17. 10.1038/s41576-018-0024-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Yu S, Ali J, Zhou Set al. From Green Super Rice to green agriculture: reaping the promise of functional genomics research. Mol Plant 2022; 15: 9–26. 10.1016/j.molp.2021.12.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

nwad210_Supplemental_Files

Articles from National Science Review are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES