Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2023 Aug 23;13:13746. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40134-4

Non cancer causes of death after gallbladder cancer diagnosis: a population-based analysis

Yang Xia 1,#, Shuangshuang Lu 1,#, Chunyan Huo 1, Li Fan 1, Min Lin 1,, Jin Huang 1,
PMCID: PMC10447554  PMID: 37612302

Abstract

Mortality from non cancer causes in patients with gallbladder cancer (GBC) still unclear. This study evaluated the causes and risk factors of non cancer death during different follow-up periods after GBC diagnosis. Non cancer causes of death for GBC patients diagnosed between 2000 and 2017 in Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database were analyzed and standardized mortality rates (SMR) for each non cancer death were calculated. Predictors for non cancer death were identified through multivariate competing risk analysis. A total 11,927 GBC patients were identified for further analysis, 9393 died during follow up. The largest proportion of non cancer deaths occurred > 3 years after diagnosis (39.4%). Most common non cancer cause were cardiovascular disease (43.3%), followed by other cause of death (34.4%) and infectious diseases (8.6%). Compared with US general population, GBC patients has higher risk of death from disease of heart (SMR, 1.58; 95%CI, 1.41–1.75), septicemia (SMR,3.21; 95%CI, 2.27–4.40), diabetes mellitus (SMR,1.97; 95%CI, 1.43–2.63), alone with other causes. Non cancer causes accounted for a significant proportion of deaths during the follow-up period after GBC diagnosis. The risk of non cancer death is higher in GBC patients than in the general population. Our study provides comprehensive assessment of death from non cancer cause in GBC patients, which has important implications for health management in GBC patients.

Subject terms: Cancer, Medical research

Introduction

Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is the most common tumor of biliary tract and the sixth most common malignant tumor of digestive system1.

With the advancement of medical technology in recent years, the prognosis of cancer patients has been improved, cancer-specific mortality rates are steadily declining, leading to growing population of cancer survivors2,3. The increasing number of cancer survivors lead to an increasing number of non cancer deaths, including deaths from non cancer comorbidities, such as cardiovascular diseases, infectious diseases, COPD and others, which posed major threat to health, survival, and quality of life in cancer patients4. It has been reported that non cancer comorbidities has become the leading cause of death among patients with colorectal, breast, and prostate cancers5, so identifying cancer patients with higher risk of non cancer death is critical and significant.

With the diversification of therapeutic measures and the improvement of public health awareness, the mortality rates of GBC patients were generally decreasing6, but the study about non cancer deaths in GBC patients still lacking. Understanding the causes of death in GBC patients can help prioritize the risk of death and provide ideas for reducing the burden of death. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) based research about non cancer death with high quality population cohort has important clinical value for GBC patients. Our research assessed standardized mortality rates (SMRs) and risk factors for non cancer death in GBC patients with the goal of screening out patients who needs of early diagnosis and treatment, which was helpful for oncologists to improve prognosis. We believe our analysis will helpful to provide constructive suggestions for the health management, which can prolong GBC patients’ survival time and optimize their quality of life.

Material and method

Data source and study population

This study was a retrospective cohort study using data from SEER database. SEER database is a population-based cancer registry sponsored by National Cancer Institute, which regularly collects demographic and clinicopathological information of cancer patients in United States. Due to the population-based program design nature of SEER database, selected data in SEER database can be used to comparison with US general population and estimating cancer incidence, mortality and survival rates7. This study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Due to the open source nature of SEER database, ethical approval of the publicly available information provided through SEER database was not required.

Variable

All patients diagnosed with GBC between 2000 and 2017 were extracted in SEER database through SEER*Stat software (version 8.4.0). Patients whose diagnosis was based on death certificates or autopsy reports were not included in our research. In order to reduce the interference of multiple primary cancers, we excluded patients with multiple primary cancers, in addition, unknown causes of death were also excluded, the specific screening process is shown in Fig. 1. We extracted following variable for analysis: age at diagnosis, race, sex, marital status, degree of differentiation, SEER summary stage, cause of death, surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy status. Well differentiated and moderately differentiated were grouped as grade I + II, poorly differentiated and undifferentiated were grouped as grade III + IV. Other race included American Indian/Alaska Native Asian or Pacific Islander patients.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Inclusion and exclusion flowchart.

Outcome

We examined the causes of death in GBC patients, death events were grouped according to the time interval from diagnosis to death as: < 1 year, 1–3 years and > 3 years. We calculated SMR for each non cancer cause of death at different intervals after GBC diagnosis, SMR is calculated by dividing the observed number of deaths among cancer patients by the expected number of deaths among the cancer-free population, cancer-free population has similar demographic characteristic with study cohort in terms of sex, age, and race within the same interval8. In present study, SMR represents the risk for specific causes of death in GBC patients compared with US general population.

Statistic analysis

We calculated SMR and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) for non cancer deaths within different interval. Multivariate competitive risk analysis was performed to determine independent predictors for non cancer death. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95%CI were used to represent associations between patient characteristics and cause of death. Non cancer death were defined as events of primary concern, while competitive events were defined as deaths from cancer causes. All tests were double-sided, P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Data analysis was performed by R software (version 4.0.0) and SEER*Stat software (version 8.4.0).

Results

Baseline characteristics

After exclusion, 11,927 GBC patients diagnosed between 2000 and 2017 were selected for further analysis. During the whole follow up periods, 9393 patients died with median survival time of 10 months (range: 0 to 215 months), the mean age of death was 71.26 years, the highest number of death occurred within 1 year, account for 62.0% of the total. Most patients in our cohort were female (70.8%), white patients account for 76.3% of the whole, black patients accounted for 12.3% and other patients accounted for 11.4%. The majority included patients in our research were well and moderate differentiation (41.0%), < 70 years old (51.1%), married (50.5%) and regional stage (35.8%). The rates of received surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy in our cohort were 69.9, 15.4 and 39.9%, respectively (Table 1). Concerning deaths from non cancer causes, a total of 1019 GBC patients died from non cancer causes during whole follow-up periods, the most common cause were cardiovascular disease (43.3%), followed by other cause of death (34.4%) and infectious diseases (8.6%). Compared with US general population, GBC patients has higher risk of death from disease of heart (SMR, 1.58; 95%CI, 1.41–1.75), hypertension without heart disease (SMR, 2.12; 95%CI, 1.35–3.19), septicemia (SMR, 3.21; 95%CI, 2.27–4.40), chronic liver disease and cirrhosis (SMR, 4.19; 95%CI, 2.63–6.34), nephritis, nephrotic syndrome and nephrosis (SMR, 1.65; 95%CI, 1.09–2.40) and diabetes mellitus (SMR, 1.97; 95%CI, 1.43–2.63), alone with other causes (Table 2).

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics and distribution of survival time in patients with gallbladder cancer.

Characteristic Total All death  < 1 year 1–3 years  > 3 years Total
N(%) Mean age N(%) N(%) N(%)
Total 11,927 9393 71.26 5828 2583 982
Timing of death after diagnosis
Age  < 70 6090 4473 60.29 2711 1337 425
70–79 3284 2666 76.56 1681 690 295
 >  = 80 2553 2254 86.74 1436 556 262
Sex Female 8439 6625 71.55 4096 1826 703
Male 3488 2768 70.56 1732 757 279
Race White 9104 7207 71.98 4428 2002 777
Black 1469 1164 67.01 745 311 108
Other 1354 1022 71.00 655 270 97
Grade I + II 4896 3407 72.43 1539 1252 616
III + IV 3595 3014 70.41 2034 762 218
Unknown 3436 2972 70.77 2255 569 148
Marital status Single 5395 4362 73.78 2809 1092 461
Married 6021 4643 68.92 2783 1380 480
Unknown 511 388 70.87 236 111 41
Diagnosis year 2000–2009 6053 5347 71.85 3158 1420 769
2010–2017 5874 4046 70.47 2670 1163 213
Stage Localized 1212 543 77.76 184 188 171
Regional 4269 3012 72.87 1484 1102 426
Distant 3823 3472 67.98 2706 710 56
Unknown 2623 2366 72.52 1454 583 329
Surgery No 3547 3257 69.81 2672 529 56
Yes 8333 6091 72.00 3123 2047 921
Unknown 47 45 74.93 33 7 5
Radiotherapy No + Unknown 10,087 7975 71.88 5207 1976 792
Yes 1840 1418 67.77 621 607 190
Chemotherapy No + Unknown 7170 5555 74.93 3519 1309 727
Yes 4757 3838 65.94 2309 1274 255

Table 2.

Standardized-mortality ratios for each cause of death following gallbladder cancer diagnosis.

Cause of death  < 1 year 1–3 years  > 3 years Total
Observed SMR(95%CI) Observed SMR(95%CI) Observed SMR(95%CI) Observed SMR(95%CI)
All cause of death 5828 28.37 2583 11.25 982 2.68 9393 11.71
(27.64–29.10) (10.82–11.70) (2.51–2.85) (11.48–11.95)
Non-cancer of death 355 2.21 277 1.53 387 1.31 1019 1.60
(1.99–2.46) (1.36–1.73) (1.19–1.45) (1.51–1.71)
Cardiovascular diseases 165 2.19 126 1.50 150 1.14 441 1.52
(1.87–2.55) (1.25–1.78) (0.97–1.34) (1.38–1.66)
 Diseases of heart 124 2.21 104 1.66 112 1.15 340 1.58
(1.84–2.64) (1.36–2.02) (0.95–1.39) (1.41–1.75)
 Hypertension without heart disease 8 3.07 6 2.00 9 1.72 23 2.12
(1.33–6.05) (0.73–4.36) (0.79–3.27) (1.35–3.19)
 Aortic aneurysm and dissection 1 1.02 3 2.85 1 0.68 5 1.43
(0.03–5.70) (0.59–8.33) (0.02–3.78) (0.46–3.33)
 Atherosclerosis 2 2.19 2 1.98 4 2.88 8 2.41
(0.27–7.91) (0.24–7.15) (0.78–7.37) (1.04–4.76)
 Cerebrovascular diseases 28 1.99 11 0.70 23 0.93 62 1.14
(1.32–2.88) (0.35–1.26) (0.59–1.40) (0.87–1.46)
 Other diseases of arteries, arterioles, capillaries 2 2.30 0 NA 1 0.67 3 0.90
(0.28–8.32) (0.02–3.73) (0.19–2.63)
Infectious diseases 33 3.24 24 2.11 31 1.74 88 2.24
(2.23–4.55) (1.35–3.14) (1.18–2.47) (1.79–2.76)
 Pneumonia and influenza 8 1.45 9 1.46 15 1.55 32 1.50
(0.63–2.87) (0.67–2.77) (0.87–2.56) (1.03–2.12)
 Syphilis 0 NA 0 NA 0 NA 0 NA
 Tuberculosis 0 NA 0 NA 0 NA 0 NA
 Septicemia 20 6.51 9 2.62 9 1.69 38 3.21
(3.97–10.05) (1.20–4.98) (0.77–3.20) (2.27–4.40)
 Other infectious diseases 5 3.67 6 3.92 7 2.80 18 3.34
(1.19–8.55) (1.44–8.54) (1.13–5.78) (1.98–5.28)
Respiratory diseases 18 1.44 13 0.94 24 1.08 55 1.13
(0.86–2.28) (0.50–1.60) (0.69–1.60) (0.85–1.47)
 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and allied Cond 18 1.44 13 0.94 24 1.08 55 1.13
(0.86–2.28) (0.50–1.60) (0.69–1.60) (0.85–1.47)
Gastrointestinal diseases 8 4.51 13 6.88 6 2.25 27 4.26
(1.95–8.89) (3.66–11.77) (0.82–4.89) (2.81–6.20)
 Stomach and duodenal ulcers 0 NA 4 12.52 1 2.13 5 4.62
(3.41–32.05) (0.05–11.89) (1.50–10.78)
 Chronic liver disease and cirrhosis 8 5.41 9 5.73 5 2.27 22 4.19
(2.34–10.66) (2.62–10.89) (0.74–5.30) (2.63–6.34)
Renal diseases 12 2.87 2 0.42 13 1.73 27 1.65
(1.48–5.02) (0.05–1.54) (0.92–2.96) (1.09–2.40)
 Nephritis, nephrotic syndrome and nephrosis 12 2.87 2 0.42 13 1.73 27 1.65
(1.48–5.02) (0.05–1.54) (0.92–2.96) (1.09–2.40)
External injuries 11 1.77 9 1.31 10 0.90 30 1.24
(0.88–3.17) (0.60–2.48) (0.43–1.66) (0.84–1.77)
 Accidents and adverse effects 9 1.80 7 1.25 9 0.97 25 1.26
(0.82–3.41) (0.50–2.57) (0.44–1.84) (0.81–1.85)
 Suicide and self-inflicted injury 2 2.60 2 2.44 0 NA 4 1.49
(0.31–9.39) (0.30–8.83) (0.40–3.80)
 Homicide and legal intervention 0 NA 0 NA 1 4.77 1 1.82
(0.12–26.57) (0.05–10.17)
Other cause of death 108 2.14 90 1.55 153 1.50 351 1.67
(1.76–2.59) (1.25–1.91) (1.27–1.75) (1.50–1.85)
 Alzheimers (ICD-9 and 10 only) 8 0.87 12 1.10 34 1.63 54 1.32
(0.37–1.71) (0.57–1.93) (1.13–2.28) (0.99–1.72)
 Diabetes mellitus 14 2.28 13 1.94 18 1.80 45 1.97
(1.25–3.83) (1.03–3.31) (1.06–2.84) (1.43–2.63)
 Congenital anomalies 0 NA 1 5.88 0 NA 1 1.76
(0.15–32.74) (0.04–9.78)
 Certain conditions originating in perinatal period 0 NA 0 NA 0 NA 0 NA
 Complications of pregnancy, childbirth, puerperium 0 NA 0 NA 0 NA 0 NA
 Symptoms, signs and ill-defifined conditions 10 3.87 6 2.00 4 0.77 20 1.85
(1.86–7.12) (0.73–4.35) (0.21–1.96) (1.13–2.86)
 Other 76 2.35 58 1.56 97 1.47 231 1.71
(1.85–2.95) (1.19–2.02) (1.19–1.80) (1.49–1.94)

NA: Not Applicable.

Non cancer cause of death within 1 year after diagnosis

A total of 5828 GBC patients died within 1 year after diagnosis, 355 (6.1%) of them died from non cancer causes, the most common non cancer cause within 1 year were cardiovascular disease (46.5%), followed by other cause of death (30.4%) and infectious diseases (9.3%) (Table 2). Compared with US general population, GBC patients has higher risk of death from disease of heart (SMR, 2.21; 95%CI, 1.84–2.64), cerebrovascular diseases (SMR, 1.99; 95%CI, 1.32–2.88), septicemia (SMR, 6.51; 95%CI, 3.97–10.05), chronic liver disease and cirrhosis (SMR, 5.41; 95%CI, 2.34–10.66), nephritis, nephrotic syndrome and nephrosis (SMR, 2.87; 95%CI, 1.48–5.02) and diabetes mellitus (SMR, 2.28; 95%CI, 1.25–3.83), alone with other causes (Table 2). Causes of death within 1 year in specific characteristics subgroups followed the same trends with overall population. GBC patients with age < 70 years has higher risk of death from pneumonia and influenza (SMR, 9.08; 95%CI, 2.47–23.26), accidents and adverse effects (SMR, 4.93; 95%CI, 1.81–10.74) (SI Table 1). White patients has higher risk of death caused by hypertension without heart disease (SMR, 3.62; 95%CI, 1.45–7.45), cerebrovascular diseases (SMR, 1.85; 95%CI, 1.14–2.82) and septicemia (SMR, 5.02; 95%CI, 2.59–8.76) (SI Table 9). For details about all subgroups, see SI Table 123.

Non cancer cause of death within 1–3 years after diagnosis

A total of 2583 GBC patients died within 1–3 years after diagnosis, 277 (10.7%) of them died from non cancer causes, most common non cancer cause within 1–3 years was cardiovascular disease (45.5%), followed by other cause of death (32.5%) and infectious diseases (8.7%) (Table 2). GBC patients has higher risk of death from disease of heart (SMR, 1.66; 95%CI, 1.36–2.02), septicemia (SMR, 2.62; 95%CI, 1.20–4.98), chronic liver disease and cirrhosis (SMR, 5.73; 95%CI, 2.62–10.89), stomach and duodenal ulcers (SMR, 12.52; 95%CI, 3.41–32.05) and diabetes mellitus (SMR, 1.94; 95%CI, 1.03–3.31) compared with US general population, alone with other causes (Table 2). Causes of death within 1–3 years after GBC diagnosis in specific subgroups followed similar trends to those in general population with the leading cause of non cancer deaths was cardiovascular disease. Female patients has higher risk of death caused by diabetes mellitus (SMR, 2.46; 95%CI, 1.23–4.41), chronic liver disease and cirrhosis (SMR, 5.57; 95%CI, 1.81–12.99) (SI Table 5). Unmarried patients has higher risk of death from pneumonia and influenza (SMR, 2.35; 95%CI, 1.02–4.64) (SI Table 7). It is worth noting that the risk of all non cancer causes of death was not significantly increased compared with US general population in age >  = 80 subgroup (SI Table 3). For details about all subgroups, see SI Table 123.

Non cancer cause of death after more than 3 years after diagnosis

A total 982 GBC patients died after 3 years of diagnosis, 387 (39.4%) patients died from non cancer causes, the most common non cancer cause after 3 years of diagnosis was other cause of death (39.5%), followed by cardiovascular disease (38.8%) and infectious diseases (8.0%) (Table 2). Compared with US general population, GBC patients has higher risk of death from other infectious diseases (SMR, 2.80; 95%CI, 1.13–5.78), alzheimers (SMR, 1.63; 95%CI, 1.13–2.28) and diabetes mellitus (SMR, 1.80; 95%CI, 1.06–2.84) (Table 2). Unmarried patients has higher risk of death caused by COPD (SMR, 1.79; 95%CI, 1.04–2.86), nephritis, nephrotic syndrome and nephrosis (SMR, 2.38; 95%CI, 1.03–4.69) (SI Table 7). Married patients has higher risk of death from chronic liver disease and cirrhosis (SMR, 3.80; 95%CI, 1.23–8.86) (SI Table 6). Localized stage patients has higher risk of death from hypertension without heart disease (SMR, 4.77; 95%CI, 1.75–10.38) and pneumonia and influenza (SMR, 2.78; 95%CI, 1.02–6.04) (SI Table 13). For details about all subgroups, see SI Table 123.

Risk factors for non cancer death in GBC patients

We screened the independent risk factors for non cancer death in GBC patients through multivariate competing risk analysis, the results indicated that following patient characteristics were independently associated with higher risks of non cancer death: 70–79 years old (HR: 1.835; 95% CI: 1.563–2.156), >  = 80 years old (HR: 3.021; 95% CI: 2.583–3.534), black race (HR: 1.517; 95% CI: 1.157–1.990), white race (HR: 1.309; 95% CI: 1.059–1.618) and patients who received surgery (HR: 1.499; 95% CI: 1.210–1.856). Meanwhile, the following patient characteristics were associated with lower risks of non cancer death: female sex (HR: 0.778; 95% CI: 0.677–0.894), grade III + IV (HR: 0.687; 95% CI: 0.590–0.800), regional (HR: 0.653; 95% CI: 0.552–0.772) or distant stage (HR: 0.343; 95% CI: 0.272–0.432), married patients (HR: 0.780; 95% CI: 0.679–0.895) and patients who received chemotherapy (HR: 0.567; 95% CI: 0.471–0.684). For details, see Table 3.

Table 3.

Risk factors for non cancer death and cardiovascular death.

Characteristic HR 95%CI P
Age  < 70 Ref
70–79 1.835 1.563–2.156  < 0.001
 >  = 80 3.021 2.583–3.534  < 0.001
Race Other Ref
Black 1.517 1.157–1.990 0.003
White 1.309 1.059–1.618 0.013
Sex Male Ref
Female 0.778 0.677–0.894  < 0.001
Grade I + II Ref
III + IV 0.687 0.590–0.800  < 0.001
Unknown 0.853 0.707–1.029 0.096
Stage Localized Ref
Regional 0.653 0.552–0.772  < 0.001
Distant 0.343 0.272–0.432  < 0.001
Unknown 0.588 0.487–0.711  < 0.001
Diagnosis year 2000–2009 Ref
2010–2017 0.667 0.579–0.768  < 0.001
Marital status Single Ref
Married 0.780 0.679–0.895  < 0.001
Unknown 0.979 0.739–1.296 0.880
Surgery No Ref
Yes 1.499 1.210–1.856  < 0.001
Unknown 0.497 0.125–1.973 0.320
Radiation No + Unknown Ref
Yes 1.076 0.864–1.339 0.510
Chemotherapy No + Unknown Ref
Yes 0.567 0.471–0.684  < 0.001

Discussion

Our study showed that most deaths among GBC patients occurred within 1 year after diagnosis and most deaths were caused by GBC. However, the proportion of GBC related deaths decreased over time, while non cancer deaths accounted for an increasing proportion after diagnosis. Among patients who survived more than 3 years in our research, 39.4% of them died from non cancer causes. Common non cancer causes of death in GBC patients included cardiovascular disease, infectious disease and others cause of death. In our analysis, the proportion of non cancer death have changed over time, cardiovascular death (CVD) has consistently dominated.

Cancer and heart disease are two main causes of death worldwide9. Previous study assessing causes of death in cancer patients pointed to an increased risk of cardiovascular disease in cancer patients10,11. A SEER database analysis concluded that CVD in cancer patients was time-dependent, with a high risk of CVD in the first year after diagnosis2. Our research get the same conclusion, in our research, GBC patients has higher risk of CVD (SMR, 1.52; 95%CI, 1.38–1.66) during the entire follow-up period, especially within 1 year after diagnosis (SMR, 2.19; 95%CI, 1.87–2.55). The association between GBC and CVD may be attributable to multiple factors, cancer patients tend to have more risk factors for cardiovascular disease, based on previous research, cancer survivors were more likely than cancer-free survivors to have high blood pressure, diabetes, dyslipidemia, overweight and a history of smoking12. In addition, cancer patients are at risk of developing deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism13. On the other hand, due to the psychological burden of tumor diagnosis, treatment and monitoring, additional psychological stress may be placed on patients which leading to the occurrence of cardiovascular events14,15. Further, GBC related treatments, such as chemotherapy, can lead to the risk of thromboembolic events which resulted ischemic heart disease as well as cerebrovascular disease16, radiotherapy is also cardiotoxic, about 10–30% of cancer patients treated with radiation have been reported to develop radiation-induced heart disease 5–10 years after treatment17. Therefore, careful evaluation should be performed before and after cancer treatments, routine cardiac imaging and serological monitoring should be considered for high-risk CVD patients18.

Fatal infections are one of the leading cause of death in cancer patients which be interpreted as results of the immunosuppression caused by the malignancy itself or various modern cancer treatments1921. Cancer patients often has poor nutrition lead to low immunity and easy infection22. Based on previous study, cancer cell affects immune system through various ways23, the process of tumor metastasis damage immune system, which leads to the higher risk of infection24, further, due to the aggressive nature of tumor cells, inadequate blood supply due to rapid tumor growth can also result infection25. In the present study, GBC patients has higher risk of death caused by septicemia (SMR, 3.21; 95%CI, 2.27–4.40), especially within 1 year after diagnosis (SMR, 6.51; 95%CI, 3.97–10.05). The development of sepsis is often associated with cancer related treatments, both surgery and chemotherapy increase the risk of sepsis26,27. In addition, neutropenia as a result of antitumor therapy is a common clinical phenomenon, which has been shown to be independently associated with sepsis2830. Compared with general population, cancer patients has greater risk of death from pneumonia31, our research get the similar conclusion in GBC patients (SMR, 1.50; 95%CI, 1.03–2.12). The susceptibility of pneumonia in cancer patients comes from several factors, including disease itself, chemotherapy and immune dysfunction32, it is reported that 50% of septic shock is caused by bacterial pneumonia within cancer patients31. Therefore, regular monitoring of infection indicators and prompt antibiotic treatment are also important parts of the treatment and follow-up strategy for GBC patients.

About 20 percent of cancer patients has diabetes33. Previous studies suggested that cancer patients, especially prostate, breast, and colorectal cancer patients, has higher risk of death from diabetes than general population4. In our research, GBC patients were more likely to died from diabetes than US general population (SMR, 1.97; 95%CI, 1.43–2.63). Cancer treatment measures can impact blood glucose, it has been suggested that higher risk of diabetes in cancer patients may be due to the processes of chemotherapy34. Further, the application of PD-1 in cancer therapy has become more and more widespread in recent years35. PD-1 inhibitors can rapidly induce severe insulin deficiency, leading to worsening of diabetes, which lead to the higher risk of death from diabetes4. In addition, because of the gallbladder is anatomically adjacent to the pancreas, small local metastases or compression may also affect blood glucose. Researches related to diabetes management models suggested that patients with diabetes have decreased blood glucose control, medication compliance, and self-management ability after cancer diagnosis16, this may lead to poor glycemic control in cancer patients with diabetes, leading to a series of complications that affect prognosis. Therefore, long-term diabetes care for GBC survivors is equally important during follow-up.

Based on Yang et al.’s analysis, cancer patients often has chronic comorbidities in the same or adjacent sites. Lung cancer patients, for example, have an increased risk of dying from respiratory diseases, gastrointestinal and liver cancer patients has increased risk of dying from digestive diseases22. In our research, GBC patients has higher risk of death caused from stomach and duodenal ulcers (SMR, 4.62; 95%CI, 1.50–10.78) and chronic liver disease and cirrhosis (SMR, 4.19; 95%CI, 2.63–6.34), confirming previous reports.

To screen out patients at high risk of non cancer death, we screened independent risk factors for non cancer death in GBC patients through multivariate competitive risk analysis, the results indicated that GBC patients with older age has higher risk of non cancer death. Elderly patients tend to have more comorbidities, such as hypertension, coronary heart disease and diabetes36,37, further, the decline of physical and physiological function in elderly patients are also related to the occurrence of non cancer death38. Mo et al.’s study about the risk of CVD in renal cancer patients suggested that black patients has higher risk of CVD than other races39, which may be due to that black patients has higher risk of venous thromboembolism40. Our study also indicated that black patients has higher risk of non cancer death in GBC patients. GBC patients with poorly differentiated and distant tumor stages has lower risk of non cancer death, these factors were reported to be independent risk factors for prognosis in GBC patients previously41. So it is possible that these patients may not live long enough to die from non cancer causes. Compared with married patients, unmarried GBC patients has higher risk of non cancer death, confirming previous reports39,42. The fact that marriage provides social support may explain this finding30. GBC patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2017 has lower risk of non cancer death than diagnosed between 2004 and 2009, possibly due to the advances in medical technology and growing emphasis on death from non cancer causes43.

Previous studies have shown that cancer patients received surgery will increases the risk of venous thromboembolism44,45. In addition, Hiong et al.’s studies indicated that cancer patients has an increased risk of postoperative sepsis, which leads to decreased cancer survival rates26, these factors may be explain the higher risk of non cancer death in GBC patients treated with surgery. Therefore, the risk of postoperative cardiovascular events in GBC patients should be considered, such as the prevention of acute hypertension and arrhythmia in postoperative care. On the other hand, received chemotherapy were protective factor for non cancer death in our analysis, consistent with previous studies39,46,47. This does not seem to fit with the common belief that chemotherapy causes cardiotoxicity and increases the risk of CVD. This may be due to that patients who receive regular chemotherapy can receive better health monitoring during treatment and receive more timely intervention when at healthy risk to avoid subsequent adverse events47. However, the underlying mechanism why chemotherapy improves non cancer death outcomes in GBC patients has not been clarified, and further studies still needed. To reduce the risk of non cancer death in GBC patients, we suggest that primary prevention should performed to higher risk patients. For most cancer survivors, the most effective strategies for primary prevention of non cancer death are smoking cessation, weight loss, exercise, proper diet, control of blood pressure and blood sugar, prevent atherosclerosis, etc., in addition, lifelong follow-up are also necessary, such as regular monitoring of some health indicators48.

There are several limitations in our analysis, first, information about non cancer comorbidities was not included in SEER database and we were unable to further explore the impact of these comorbidities on non cancer mortality in GBC patients, in addition, different treatment regimens and duration impact non cancer mortality, but the specific dose, type and duration of radiotherapy and chemotherapy regimens are not recorded in detail in SEER database46. Second, all patients in SEER database were selected in United States, so cases from Europe and Asia are needed to further validate our study. Finally, because the study was retrospective, which could biased the results. Despite some limitations mentioned above, this study is still meaningful and helpful in the clinical management for GBC patients.

Conclusion

During the whole follow-up period after GBC diagnosis, the proportion of non cancer death in GBC patients gradually increased with the prolongation of diagnosis time, cardiovascular diseases and infectious diseases were the common causes. GBC patients has higher risk of death caused from cardiovascular diseases, infectious diseases, other cause of death and gastrointestinal diseases. These findings have important implications for clinical management in GBC patients.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Table 1. (17.5KB, docx)
Supplementary Table 2. (17.1KB, docx)
Supplementary Table 3. (17.2KB, docx)
Supplementary Table 4. (17.2KB, docx)
Supplementary Table 5. (17.4KB, docx)
Supplementary Table 6. (17.3KB, docx)
Supplementary Table 7. (18KB, docx)
Supplementary Table 8. (16.7KB, docx)
Supplementary Table 9. (17.4KB, docx)
Supplementary Table 10. (17.7KB, docx)
Supplementary Table 11. (17.1KB, docx)
Supplementary Table 12. (17.2KB, docx)
Supplementary Table 14. (17.3KB, docx)
Supplementary Table 17. (17.2KB, docx)
Supplementary Table 18. (17.4KB, docx)
Supplementary Table 19. (17.2KB, docx)
Supplementary Table 21. (17.2KB, docx)
Supplementary Table 22. (17.1KB, docx)
Supplementary Table 23. (17.3KB, docx)

Acknowledgements

All authors acknowledge contributions from the SEER program.

Abbreviations

GBC

Gallbladder cancer

SEER

Epidemiology and end results

SMR

Standardized mortality rates; 95%

CI

95% Confidence intervals

HRs

Hazard ratios

CVD

Cardiovascular death

Author contributions

Y.X. and S.L. contributed equally to this work. The design of the study was performed by M.L. and J.H., and the study was performed by Y.X. and S.L. Technical assistance was provided by L.F. and C.H. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Changzhou No.2 People’s Hospital Fund (2019HZD001), Nanjing Medical University Science and Technology Development Fund (NMUC2021026A) and Changzhou High-Level Medical Talents Training project (2022CZBJ052).

Data availability

The datasets analyzed in this study are available in the SEER repository and can be obtained from: https://seer.cancer.gov/data/.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Yang Xia and Shuangshuang Lu.

Contributor Information

Min Lin, Email: tianya-liulang@sohu.com.

Jin Huang, Email: hj042153@qq.com.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-023-40134-4.

References

  • 1.Low SK, Giannis D, Thuong ND, Nam NH, Alshareef A, Koulas I, et al. Trends in primary gallbladder cancer incidence and incidence-based mortality in the United States, 1973 to 2015. Am. J. Clin. Oncol. 2022;45(7):306–315. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sturgeon KM, Deng L, Bluethmann SM, Zhou S, Trifiletti DM, Jiang C, et al. A population-based study of cardiovascular disease mortality risk in US cancer patients. Eur. Heart J. 2019;40(48):3889–3897. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zaorsky NG, Zhang Y, Tuanquin L, Bluethmann SM, Park HS, Chinchilli VM. Suicide among cancer patients. Nat. Commun. 2019;10(1):207. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-08170-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zhu X, Heng Y, Zhou L, Zhang M, Cao P, Tao L. Diabetic mortality risk among cancer patients in the United State SEER population, 1975–2016. Endocrine. 2020;70(2):323–330. doi: 10.1007/s12020-020-02405-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wang Q, Zeng Z, Nan J, Zheng Y, Liu H. Cause of death among patients with thyroid cancer: A population-based study. Front. Oncol. 2022;12:852347. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.852347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Huang J, Patel HK, Boakye D, Chandrasekar VT, Koulaouzidis A, Lucero-Prisno Iii DE, et al. Worldwide distribution, associated factors, and trends of gallbladder cancer: A global country-level analysis. Cancer Lett. 2021;521:238–251. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2021.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chen J, Peng J, Zheng Y, Li S, Yang P, Wu X, et al. Primary renal lymphoma: A population-based study in the United States, 1980–2013. Sci. Rep. 2019;9(1):15125. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51635-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Afifi AM, Elmehrath AO, Ruhban IA, Saad AM, Gad MM, Al-Husseini MJ, et al. Causes of death following nonmetastatic colorectal cancer diagnosis in the USA population-based analysis. Oncologist. 2021;26(9):733–739. doi: 10.1002/onco.13854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wu XQ, Li JY, Du WJ. Causes of death following small cell lung cancer diagnosis: A population-based analysis. BMC Pulm. Med. 2022;22(1):262. doi: 10.1186/s12890-022-02053-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ruparel M, Quaife SL, Dickson JL, Horst C, Burke S, Taylor M, et al. Evaluation of cardiovascular risk in a lung cancer screening cohort. Thorax. 2019;74(12):1140–1146. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2018-212812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sun JY, Zhang ZY, Qu Q, Wang N, Zhang YM, Miao LF, et al. Cardiovascular disease-specific mortality in 270,618 patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Int. J. Cardiol. 2021;330:186–193. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.02.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Armenian SH, Xu L, Ky B, Sun C, Farol LT, Pal SK, et al. Cardiovascular disease among survivors of adult-onset cancer: A community-based retrospective cohort study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2016;34(10):1122–1130. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.64.0409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Totzeck M, Schuler M, Stuschke M, Heusch G, Rassaf T. Cardio-oncology-strategies for management of cancer-therapy related cardiovascular disease. Int. J. Cardiol. 2019;280:163–175. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.01.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Shen Q, Lu D, Schelin ME, Jöud A, Cao Y, Adami HO, et al. Injuries before and after diagnosis of cancer: Nationwide register based study. BMJ. 2016;354:i4218. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Fang F, Fall K, Mittleman MA, Sparén P, Ye W, Adami HO, et al. Suicide and cardiovascular death after a cancer diagnosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012;366(14):1310–1318. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1110307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pinheiro LC, Soroka O, Kern LM, Leonard JP, Safford MM. Diabetes care management patterns before and after a cancer diagnosis: A SEER-Medicare matched cohort study. Cancer. 2020;126(8):1727–1735. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Carver JR, Shapiro CL, Ng A, Jacobs L, Schwartz C, Virgo KS, et al. American society of clinical oncology clinical evidence review on the ongoing care of adult cancer survivors: Cardiac and pulmonary late effects. J. Clin. Oncol. 2007;25(25):3991–4008. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.10.9777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Armenian SH, Lacchetti C, Barac A, Carver J, Constine LS, Denduluri N, et al. Prevention and monitoring of cardiac dysfunction in survivors of adult cancers: American society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline. J. Clin. Oncol. 2017;35(8):893–911. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.70.5400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chanock S. Evolving risk factors for infectious complications of cancer therapy. Hematol. Oncol. Clin. North Am. 1993;7(4):771–793. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zembower TR. Epidemiology of infections in cancer patients. Cancer Treat. Res. 2014;161:43–89. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-04220-6_2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Donnelly JP, Blijlevens NM, van der Velden WJ. Host impairments in patients with neoplastic diseases. Cancer Treat. Res. 2014;161:1–41. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-04220-6_1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Yang P, Zheng Y, Chen J, Ma H, Yu K, Chen Y, et al. Immediate risk of non-cancer deaths after a cancer diagnosis. BMC Cancer. 2021;21(1):963. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08707-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Goldszmid RS, Dzutsev A, Trinchieri G. Host immune response to infection and cancer: Unexpected commonalities. Cell Host Microbe. 2014;15(3):295–305. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2014.02.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Liyanage UK, Moore TT, Joo HG, Tanaka Y, Herrmann V, Doherty G, et al. Prevalence of regulatory T cells is increased in peripheral blood and tumor microenvironment of patients with pancreas or breast adenocarcinoma. J. Immunol. 2002;169(5):2756–2761. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.169.5.2756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chen J, Zheng Y, Wang H, Zhang D, Zhao L, Yu D, et al. Cause of death among patients with colorectal cancer: A population-based study in the United States. Aging. 2020;12(22):22927–22948. doi: 10.18632/aging.104022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hiong A, Thursky KA, Teh BW, Haeusler GM, Slavin MA, Worth LJ. Sepsis following cancer surgery: the need for early recognition and standardised clinical care. Expert Rev. Anti Infect. Ther. 2016;14(4):425–433. doi: 10.1586/14787210.2016.1154787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Liu Z, Mahale P, Engels EA. Sepsis and risk of cancer among elderly adults in the United States. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2019;68(5):717–724. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kochanek M, Schalk E, von Bergwelt-Baildon M, Beutel G, Buchheidt D, Hentrich M, et al. Management of sepsis in neutropenic cancer patients: 2018 guidelines from the infectious diseases working party (AGIHO) and intensive care working party (iCHOP) of the German society of hematology and medical oncology (DGHO) Ann. Hematol. 2019;98(5):1051–1069. doi: 10.1007/s00277-019-03622-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Schreiber RD, Old LJ, Smyth MJ. Cancer immunoediting: Integrating immunity's roles in cancer suppression and promotion. Science. 2011;331(6024):1565–1570. doi: 10.1126/science.1203486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Yu DD, Chen WK, Wu CY, Wu WT, Xin X, Jiang YL, et al. Cause of death during renal cell carcinoma survivorship: A contemporary population-based analysis. Front. Oncol. 2022;12:864132. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.864132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.de Montmollin E, Tandjaoui-Lambiotte Y, Legrand M, Lambert J, Mokart D, Kouatchet A, et al. Outcomes in critically ill cancer patients with septic shock of pulmonary origin. Shock. 2013;39(3):250–254. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e3182866d32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Elhadi M, Khaled A, Msherghi A. Infectious diseases as a cause of death among cancer patients: A trend analysis and population-based study of outcome in the United States based on the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database. Infect. Agent Cancer. 2021;16(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s13027-021-00413-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Giovannucci E, Harlan DM, Archer MC, Bergenstal RM, Gapstur SM, Habel LA, et al. Diabetes and cancer: A consensus report. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(7):1674–1685. doi: 10.2337/dc10-0666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Accordino MK, Wright JD, Buono D, Lin A, Huang Y, Neugut AI, et al. Incidence and predictors of diabetes mellitus after a diagnosis of early-stage breast cancer in the elderly using real-world Data. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2020;183(1):201–211. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05756-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wang L, Tang K, Li X, Lu W. Anti-PD-1-based immunotherapy plus lenvatinib to treat advanced gallbladder cancer in the elderly: A case series and review of current literature. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2022;149(3):941–950. doi: 10.1007/s00432-022-04126-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Chen RC, Royce TJ, Extermann M, Reeve BB. Impact of age and comorbidity on treatment and outcomes in elderly cancer patients. Semin. Radiat. Oncol. 2012;22(4):265–271. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2012.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kim MG, Kim HS, Kim BS, Kwon SJ. The impact of old age on surgical outcomes of totally laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Surg. Endosc. 2013;27(11):3990–3997. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3073-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Chen C, Xu F, Yuan S, Zhao X, Qiao M, Han D, et al. Competing risk analysis of cardiovascular death in patients with primary gallbladder cancer. Cancer Med. 2022;12(3):2179–2186. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Mo X, Zhou M, Yan H, Chen X, Wang Y. Competing risk analysis of cardiovascular/cerebrovascular death in T1/2 kidney cancer: A SEER database analysis. BMC Cancer. 2021;21(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07718-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Patel RK, Ford E, Thumpston J, Arya R. Risk factors for venous thrombosis in the black population. Thromb. Haemost. 2003;90(5):835–838. doi: 10.1160/TH03-05-0311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Jiang S, Zhang J, Zhang L, Xu Y, Zhao H, Sang X, et al. A novel nomogram based on log odds of positive lymph nodes to predict survival for non-metastatic gallbladder adenocarcinoma after surgery. Sci. Rep. 2022;12(1):16466. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20933-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Guo Y, Dong X, Mao S, Yang F, Wang R, Ma W, et al. Causes of death after prostate cancer diagnosis: A population-based study. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2022;2022:8145173. doi: 10.1155/2022/8145173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hoang G, Nguyen K, Le A. Metabolic intersection of cancer and cardiovascular diseases: Opportunities for cancer therapy. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2021;1311:249–263. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-65768-0_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Osborne NH, Wakefield TW, Henke PK. Venous thromboembolism in cancer patients undergoing major surgery. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2008;15(12):3567–3578. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-0151-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Agnelli G, Bolis G, Capussotti L, Scarpa RM, Tonelli F, Bonizzoni E, et al. A clinical outcome-based prospective study on venous thromboembolism after cancer surgery: The @RISTOS project. Ann. Surg. 2006;243(1):89–95. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000193959.44677.48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Guan T, Qiu Z, Su M, Yang J, Tang Y, Jiang Y, et al. Cardiovascular death risk in primary central nervous system lymphoma patients treated with chemotherapy: A registry-based cohort study. Front. Oncol. 2021;11:641955. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.641955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Xia Y, Lin M, Huang J, Fan L. Cardiovascular disease related death among patients with esophagus cancer: A population-based competing risk analysis. Front. Oncol. 2022;12:976711. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.976711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Haugnes HS, Wethal T, Aass N, Dahl O, Klepp O, Langberg CW, et al. Cardiovascular risk factors and morbidity in long-term survivors of testicular cancer: A 20-year follow-up study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2010;28(30):4649–4657. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.29.9362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Table 1. (17.5KB, docx)
Supplementary Table 2. (17.1KB, docx)
Supplementary Table 3. (17.2KB, docx)
Supplementary Table 4. (17.2KB, docx)
Supplementary Table 5. (17.4KB, docx)
Supplementary Table 6. (17.3KB, docx)
Supplementary Table 7. (18KB, docx)
Supplementary Table 8. (16.7KB, docx)
Supplementary Table 9. (17.4KB, docx)
Supplementary Table 10. (17.7KB, docx)
Supplementary Table 11. (17.1KB, docx)
Supplementary Table 12. (17.2KB, docx)
Supplementary Table 14. (17.3KB, docx)
Supplementary Table 17. (17.2KB, docx)
Supplementary Table 18. (17.4KB, docx)
Supplementary Table 19. (17.2KB, docx)
Supplementary Table 21. (17.2KB, docx)
Supplementary Table 22. (17.1KB, docx)
Supplementary Table 23. (17.3KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The datasets analyzed in this study are available in the SEER repository and can be obtained from: https://seer.cancer.gov/data/.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES