Skip to main content
Heliyon logoLink to Heliyon
. 2023 Aug 7;9(8):e18999. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18999

Inorganic nutrients and heavy metals in some wild edible plants consumed by rural communities in Northern Uganda: Implications for human health

Alfred Nyero a,, Innocent Achaye a, Godwin Upoki Anywar c, Geoffrey Maxwell Malinga b
PMCID: PMC10447991  PMID: 37636347

Abstract

For centuries, wild edible plant species have sustained local communities across Africa by supplementing households’ diets in seasons of food shortage. Wild edible plants contain inorganic nutrients, which are essential for the proper functioning of organisms. However, their nutritional contents have not been well researched and are generally poorly understood. This study aimed to quantify the levels of inorganic micro-and macronutrients as well as heavy metals (Mg, Ca, K, Fe, Zn, Cd, Hg and Pb) in selected wild edible plants traditionally consumed among the Acholi communities in northern Uganda, and associated health risks of consuming them. The leaves and young stems of 12 wild edible plants, viz: Acalypha rhomboidea, Asystacia gangetica, Crassocephalum sacrobasis, Crotalaria ochroleuca, Heterotis rotundifolia, Hibiscus cannabinus, Hibiscus sp., Hibiscus surattensis, Ipomoea eriocarpa, Maerua angolensis, Senna obtusifolia and Vigna membranacea were air-dried and crushed to powder. The powders were then macerated using aqua regia solution and analyzed in triplicates using the Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry (AAS). The target hazard quotient (THQ) of Pb was calculated for non-carcinogenic health risks. Mg, Ca, K, Fe, Zn and Pb were detectable in all the wild edible plants sampled. All inorganic nutrients (mg/100gdw), were below the Recommended Daily Allowance (RDA); Mg (9.4 ± 0.19 to 10.4 ± 0.15), Ca (119 ± 5.82 to 1265 ± 14.9), Fe (3.29 ± 0.02 to 11.2 ± 0.09), Zn (0.52 ± 0.02 to 2.36 ± 0.03). Hg and Cd were below detectable limits in all the samples tested. The content of Pb (0.69 ± 0.11 to1.22 ± 0.07) was higher than the CODEX and EU limits of 0.1 ppm (0.001 mg/g) but was below the recommended threshold of 1. The health risk assessment revealed no potential hazards both in children and adults. However, there is a need to study the bioavailability of Pb when the vegetables are consumed due to factors such as indigestion and antinutritional compounds.

Keywords: Inorganic nutrients, Heavy metals, Target hazard quotient, Food safety, Wild edible plants, Acholi sub-region

1. Introduction

Micronutrient deficiencies remain a significant global public health challenge. More than two billion people in the world suffer from micronutrient deficiencies. This is mainly due to the assimilation of diets that lack essential micronutrients, particularly vitamin A, iodine, iron and zinc [[1], [2], [3]]. The majority of these people live in low-to middle-income countries. The groups most vulnerable to micronutrient deficiencies are young children, pregnant women, lactating mothers and the elderly. This can be mainly attributed to their relatively substantial demand for vitamins and minerals and they are more susceptible to the negative outcome of deficiencies [4,5]. For example, for a pregnant woman, micronutrient deficiencies have been linked to the altered length of gestation, and impaired foetal development and growth, which can lead to pregnancy loss, greater risk of dying during childbirth, and birth to a small or mentally impaired baby [6]. For a young child, micronutrient deficiencies increase the risk of dying due to infections and contribute to impaired physical and mental development.

The consumption of wild edible plants is seen as a sustainable solution to inorganic micronutrient deficiencies. Many communities, particularly in northern Uganda, consume wild edible plants [[7], [8], [9], [10]]. Wild edible plants are essential in supplementing staple foods by supplying vitamins, minerals, phytochemicals and antioxidants. They have also been reported to be good sources of macro-and micronutrients or trace elements, including B, Cu, Fe, Mn, Mo, Zn, Na, K, Mg, Ca, N, S, and P [[11], [12], [13]]. Inorganic micronutrients are particularly needed in the body in small amounts to drive essential processes, including energy metabolism, nerve functions and muscle contraction [14]. Zinc plays a vital role in transmitting information within and between cells. Therefore, these food plants could help overcome macro-and micronutrient deficiencies since the local community easily accesses them cheaply. However, wild edible plants grow in natural environments. They are therefore vulnerable to contamination with heavy metals like Cd, Ag, Se, Fe, Mg, Zn, Cu, Mo, Pb, Hg and Ni from different sources, including soil and run-off water [15]. These wild edible plants take up the metals by absorbing them from contaminated soil, water and deposits on plant parts with high exposure to polluted air [16,17]. Nevertheless, given that wild edible plants are regularly and readily consumed in most rural areas because of their abundance, nutrient richness and potential health benefits, their continued consumption may pose severe health risks for the consumers [18,19]. Human exposure to toxic metals is a global environmental health burden today [20,21]. This is because heavy metals can bioaccumulate in living organisms and can be toxic at elevated levels [22,23]. For instance, Pb is one of the systemic environmental toxicants implicated in causing cancer, neurological and cardiac problems, kidney damage, and hemolytic anemia [24,25]. Pb has been used worldwide for centuries and is present in products such as car batteries, gasoline and paints leading to increased toxicity in humans [23]. In blood, Pb toxicity disrupts the functions of the digestive, circulatory, central nervous, respiratory and reproductive systems and everyday activities of enzymes [26]. Children are at a higher toxicity risk than adults because their body tissues are still young and susceptible to Pb contamination [27]. Another heavy metal of concern is Cd because it is mostly responsible for kidney and liver dysfunction, which is indicated by the passing of proteins in urine [28,29]. Long-term exposure to Cd may cause numerous types of cancer [30]. Knowledge of the inorganic nutrient content in food is needed, especially in the current dietary shift to fast foods, which lack the required nutrients for body health [31]. Consumption of heavy metals contaminated plants negates the benefits of eating such plants and results in heavy metal poisoning. Investigations of the heavy metals in wild edible plants are thus essential for environmental safety and for reducing the risks associated with their consumption. Hence, there is a need for continuous scientific assessment of the heavy metals in wild edible plants, especially those grown in urban areas with contaminations from industrial and domestic wastes [32]. Although certain heavy metals such as Co, Mn, Ni, Cu and Fe are essential components for various biological activities within the body, their elevated levels can cause numerous health consequences to humans. Thus, this study aimed to determine the contents of inorganic micro-and macronutrients and heavy metals in selected wild edible plants consumed in the Acholi sub-region.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Collection and preparation of plant samples

Healthy leaves and young stems of twelve wild edible plants from two sub-counties in Omoro district within the Acholi sub-region of northern Uganda were collected using standard methods according to the World Health Organization guidelines on good agricultural and collection practices for medicinal plants [33]. The Acholi sub-region was severely affected by the war between Joseph's Kony's Lord Resistance Army and the Uganda People's defense forces from mid-1980's to 2006, where heavy weaponries were used [34]. The sampling sites were located far away from roads with heavy traffic or manufacturing industries. Samples of plant materials were randomly collected from between 20 and 30 individual plant species for subsequent analysis. These plants were Acalypha rhomboidea Raf., Asystacia gangetica (L.) T. Anderson, Crassocephalum sacrobasis (DC.) S. Moore, Crotalaria ochroleuca G.Don., Heterotis rotundifolia (Sm.) Jacq.-Fél, Hibiscus cannabinus L., Hibiscus sp., Hibiscus surratensis L., Ipomoea eriocarpa R.Br., Maerua angolensis DC., Senna obtusifolia (L.) Irwin & Barneby and Vigna membranacea A. Rich. Voucher specimens of the plant species were collected and taken to the Makerere University herbarium for identification. The plant samples were shade dried at room temperature for 5–10 days or until the parts were completely dried and subsequently dried in the oven at 100 °C to constant weight. The dried samples were grounded into a fine powder using an electric grinder.

2.2. Determination of inorganic nutrients and heavy metals in edible plants

The powder samples from each plant were used for the elemental assay using a standard procedure based on AOAC methods [35]. Eight inorganic elements were chosen because of their various roles in the human body's physiological and biochemical functions. These elements were Mg, Ca, K, Fe, Pb, Zn, Hg, and Cd. Quantification tests for the elements were done in triplicate. About 2 g of powder sample was weighed into a clean boiling tube. Distilled water (5.0 ml) and concentrated nitric acid (25 ml) were added and mixed by shaking gently. The mixture was refluxed over a water bath at 90 °C for 4 h, cooled and 10 ml of 70% perchloric acid added. The tubes were refluxed over a water bath at the same temperature for 1 h and later cooled to room temperature. Concentrated hydrochloric acid (2 ml) was then added to the sample, made to 100 ml with distilled water and filtered. All glassware used in the analysis was washed, soaked in aqua regia for 2 h, then rinsed with deionised water and dried in the oven. All reagents used in this study were of analytical grade: hydrochloric acid ‘AnalaR’ (sp. gr. 1.18, BDH), nitric acid ‘AnalaR’ (sp. gr. 1.42, BDH), perchloric acid ‘AnalaR’ (sp. gr.1.70 BDH), stock solutions 1000 ppm (1 mg/g) (Sigma-Aldrich) of Mg, Ca, K, Fe, Pb, Zn, Hg and Cd were serially diluted to make standard solutions in the concentrations of 0.125, 0.25, 0.50, 1.00 ppm for calibration. To both standard and sample solutions,1% (w/v) lanthanum solution was added to overcome potential interferences. The samples were then analyzed using a graphite furnace flame Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer (Shimatzu model AA-63000, Japan). The mineral concentrations were expressed as mg/100 g dry weight (dw) and compared with the Recommended Daily Allowances, RDA [33,36,37]. Two reference materials were used for the optimization of sample digestion: ERM-CC580 (Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements, IRMM, Belgium) estuarine sediment with the certified total mercury content of (132 ± 3) μg/g and ERM-CE464 tuna fish (IRMM, Belgium) with the certified total mercury content of (5.24 ± 0.10) μg/g as described in Bulska et al. [38].

2.3. Human health risk assessment

The heavy metals health risk assessment was done using the standard method [39,40]. The estimated daily intake (EDI) and target hazard quotient (THQ) were calculated to determine the potential effects of heavy metal contamination on the health of both children and adults.

2.3.1. Estimated daily intake

The estimated average daily intake, EDI (mg/kg body weight/day), represented an estimate of the daily exposure dose of pollutants/heavy metals that consumers might be exposed to through their diets. The EDI was calculated using the formula = C × CR × IR/BW [41,42], Where C is the concentration of heavy metal, CR is the conversion factor (To convert the concentration of sample from dry weight to fresh weight values, a conversion factor of 0.2 was used based on the moisture content of fresh leaf (80%); IR is the average daily consumption which was considered as 0.3 kg/person/day [43], 0.17 kg/person/day [44] and 0.1 kg/person/day [45]. BW is the average body weight of consumers, which was estimated as 27 kg for children aged 6–9yrs [46] and 70.3 kg for adults [47,48].

2.3.2. Target hazard quotient

The target hazard quotient (THQ) of each pollutant/heavy metal is an estimate of the non-carcinogenic health risk level [41,42] due to the consumption of wild edible plants. THQ refers to the ratio of mean daily dose of heavy metal to its reference dose. According to US EPA [49], and Zhang et al. [50], THQ and HI values > 1 indicate a potential adverse cancer effect, while values < 1 denote non-adverse cancer risk in consumers. To estimate the human health risk from consuming heavy metals/pollutants in food, the THQ was calculated using the following formula:

THQ=EDIRfD,

RfD is the daily intake reference dose (an estimate of the daily dosage to which the consumers may be continuously exposed over a lifetime without experiencing any harmful effects). RfD for Pb = 0.0035 mg/kg/day.

2.4. Statistical analysis

The data were analyzed using the statistical package for social sciences, SPSS version 26.0, and presented as mean ± standard deviation. Differences in inorganic nutrient and heavy metal contents among plant species were evaluated using analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Turkey Post-Hoc test as the multiple comparison procedure.

3. Results and discussion

Our findings on metal elements content of selected wild edible plant species (Table 1) show that Mg content varied between 10.42 ± 0.15 mg/100 g in A. gangetica to 9.48 ± 0.19 mg/100 g (dw) in H. cannabinus. These values are higher than the Mg values for H. cannabinus reported by Amagloh and Nyarko [51], which was 508.28 mg/kg. Magnesium concentration in the fresh weight of the wild edible plants was approximately uniform at 0.02 mg/g, according to our study. The daily intake of Mg in all the wild edible plants in this study for both adults and children was 2 mg (Table 2). This value is lower than the Reference Daily Allowance (RDA) for both children and adults. The assumption is that both adults and children eat at least 100 g of fresh vegetables daily. However, these edible plants are not the sole diet of the locals. Thus, other food items consumed contribute towards the realization of the RDA. The RDA values for Mg are (300–600 mg) for infants below 6 years, and (280–350 mg) adults. Magnesium is a cofactor in more than 300 enzyme systems that regulate diverse biochemical reactions in the body, including protein synthesis, muscle and nerve transmission, neuromuscular conduction, signal transduction, blood glucose control, and blood pressure regulation [52,53]. Magnesium also acts as a cofactor during RNA and DNA synthesis [54].

Table 1.

Mean concentration of macro- and micro-nutrients in mg/100 g (dw) ± standard deviation.

Plant samples Mg Ca Fe K Pb Zn
Acalypha rhomboidea 10.23 ± 0.14cd 1170.14 ± 17.00g 8.21 ± 0.04h 2268.20 ± 15.18f 0.99 ± 0.11ab 1.38 ± 0.01f
Asystasia gangetica 10.42 ± 0.15d 532.39 ± 25.76e 11.20 ± 0.09j 2180.15 ± 19.20f 1.22 ± 0.07b 1.82 ± 0.01h
Crassoccephalum sacrobasis 9.83 ± 0.07ab 150.12 ± 1.82a 9.17 ± 0.03i 3346.84 ± 486.86g 0.98 ± 0.04ab 2.36 ± 0.03i
Crotalaria ochroleuca 10.05 ± 0.07bc 122.18 ± 10.69a 5.06 ± 0.03e 839.48 ± 39.70bc 1.77 ± 0.13c 1.45 ± 0.01g
Heterotis rotundifolia 9.68 ± 0.06a 223.46 ± 9.19b 6.13 ± 0.02f 782.74 ± 4.90bc 0.94 ± 0.03ab 0.95 ± 0.01d
Hibiscus cannabinus 9.48 ± 0.19a 458.13 ± 20.47d 4.31 ± 0.10c 518.65 ± 2.92ab 1.12 ± 0.25b 0.98 ± 0.01d
Hibiscus sp. 9.66 ± 0.11a 576.40 ± 23.85e 11.21 ± 0.08j 532.28 ± 9.77ab 0.87 ± 0.22ab 0.73 ± 0.01c
Hibiscus surattensis 10.23 ± 0.07cd 835.88 ± 10.22f 6.69 ± 0.03g 288.37 ± 1.00a 0.69 ± 0.11a 0.55 ± 0.01d
Ipomoea eriocarpa 9.81 ± 0.13ab 118.51 ± 5.82a 4.75 ± 0.04d 1494.40 ± 14.92de 1.19 ± 0.20b 0.62 ± 0.02b
Maerua angolensis 10.11 ± 0.20bcd 523.73 ± 46.63e 3.82 ± 0.04b 1554.60 ± 13.65e 0.98 ± 0.05ab 0.52 ± 0.02a
Senna obtusifolia 9.77 ± 0.02ab 1265.30 ± 14.94h 3.29 ± 0.02a 1112.13 ± 4.49cd 0.87 ± 0.06ab 1.34 ± 0.01f
Vigna membranacea 10.28 ± 0.07cd 351.60 ± 11.31c 4.42 ± 0.09c 914.63 ± 19.13bc 0.87 ± 0.02ab 1.26 ± 0.01e

All tabulated mean ± standard deviation (s.d) values were derived from triplicate sample tests. Turkeys test at 95% confidence level and statistical significance level was taken at p < 0.05. The superscript letters a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i shown in the table denote significant differences (p < 0.05). Mercury and cadmium were below detectable limits and omitted from table. A one-way ANOVA revealed that there was a statistically significant difference in mean inorganic components among the twelve wild edible plants: Mg [F(11, 23) = 17.73, p = 0.00)]; Ca [F(11, 23) = 1088.94, p = 0.00], Fe [F(11,23) = 7064.15, p = 0.00], K [F(11,23) = 115.42, p = 0.00], Pb [F(11,23) = 12.48, p = 0.00], and Zn [F(11,23) = 4400.87, p = 0.00].

Table 2.

Macro-nutrients concentration of mineral nutrients mg/g for dry weight and fresh weight (dw and fw), daily intake (DI)* and percentage recommended daily allowance (%RDA) for Mg, Ca and K.



Mg



Ca



K


Sample dw fw DI %RDA dw fw DI %RDA dw fw DI %RDA
Acalypha rhomboidea 0.10 0.02 2.05 0.73 11.70 2.34 234.03 39.00 22.70 4.54 453.64 28.35
Asystasiagangetica 0.104 0.02 2.08 0.74 5.32 1.06 106.48 17.75 21.80 4.36 436.03 27.25
Crassoccephalum sacrobasis 0.098 0.02 1.97 0.70 1.50 0.30 30.02 5.00 33.50 6.69 669.37 41.84
Crotalaria ochroleuca 0.101 0.02 2.01 0.72 1.22 0.24 24.44 4.07 8.39 1.68 167.90 10.49
Heterotis rotundifolia 0.097 0.02 1.94 0.69 2.23 0.45 44.69 7.45 7.83 1.57 156.55 9.78
Hibiscus cannabinus 0.095 0.02 1.90 0.68 4.58 0.92 91.63 15.27 5.19 1.04 103.73 6.48
Hibiscus sp. 0.097 0.02 1.93 0.69 5.76 1.15 115.28 19.21 5.32 1.06 106.46 6.65
Hibiscus surattensis 0.102 0.02 2.05 0.73 8.36 1.67 167.18 27.86 2.88 0.58 57.67 3.60
Ipomoea eriocarpa 0.098 0.02 1.96 0.70 1.19 0.24 23.70 3.95 14.90 2.99 298.88 18.68
Maerua angolensis 0.101 0.02 2.02 0.72 5.24 1.05 104.75 17.46 15.60 3.11 310.92 19.43
Senna obtusifolia 0.098 0.02 1.95 0.70 12.65 2.53 253.06 42.18 11.10 2.22 222.43 13.90
Vigna membranacea 0.103 0.02 2.06 0.74 3.57 0.71 71.35 11.59 9.17 1.83 183.33 11.46


RDA (mg/day)

Mg Ca K
Infants 3-6 300–600 600–800 1600
Pregnant/Lactating mothers 280 1200 3500
Post-menupose/men 350 800 3500

Calcium content varied between 1265.30 ± 14.94 mg/g in S. obtusifolia to 118.51 ± 5.82 mg/g in I. eriocarpa. Calcium content in fresh weight of vegetables ranges from 2.53 mg/g in S. obtusifolia to 0.24 in I. eriocarpa and C. ochroleuca (Table 2). Sudi et al. [55] reported Ca content of 2.64 ppm (2.64 × 10−3 mg/g), which is lower than the value in our findings. Again, this consumption does not meet children's and adults' daily requirements. The RDA values for Ca are 600–800 mg for infants below 6 years, and 800–1200 mg for adults. Calcium content in fresh weight (mg/100 g fw) of other conventional vegetables, for instance, cabbages vary from 32.1 ± 0.8 to 44.0 ± 1.4 mg/g [56]. Calcium salts provide rigidity to the skeleton and calcium ions play a role in many metabolic processes. It is essential for maintaining bones and teeth strong over a lifetime. It also ensures the proper functioning of muscles and nerves and helps blood clot processes [57]. Calcium is involved in vascular contraction, vasodilation, muscle functions, nerve transmission, intracellular signaling and hormonal secretion [58].

The potassium content varied between 3346.84 ± 486.86 mg/100 g (dw) in C. sacrobasis to 288.37 ± 1.04 mg (dw) in H. surattensis. Potassium content in fresh weight of vegetables ranges from 6.69 to 0.58 mg/100 g. The daily intake of K through eating 100 g of fresh wild edible plants for adults and children in this study ranged from 58 to 669 mg. This, again does not supply the RDA. The RDA values for K are 1600 mg for infants below six years and 3500 mg for adults (Table 2). Potassium plays an essential role in cell metabolism, participating in energy transduction, hormone secretion, and the regulation of protein and glycogen synthesis [37]. It also reduces the risk of blood pressure, stroke, and cardiovascular disease [59].

The iron content varied between 11.21 ± 0.08 mg/g in Hibiscus sp., and A. gangetica to 3.29 ± 0.02 mg/g in S. obtusifolia. Fe content in fresh weight of the 12 vegetables ranged from 0.02 to 0.01 mg/g. The daily intake of Fe through eating 100 g of fresh wild edible plants for adults and children ranged from 1 to 2 mg which is below the RDA. The RDA value for Fe was 10 mg for infants below three years and adults (Table 3). Iron is an essential mineral for oxygen transport and energy production and is a functional component of hemoglobin and myoglobin. Iron is a crucial part of cytochromes in the electron transport system during the biochemical process of energy production [60].

Table 3.

Micro-nutrients concentration of mineral nutrients mg/g for dry weight (dw)and fresh weight (fw), daily intake (DI)* and percentage recommended daily allowance (%RDA) for Fe and Zn in dry weight (dw) and fresh weight (fw).



Fe



Zn


Sample dw fw DI %RDA dw fw DI %RDA
Acalypha rhomboidea 0.08 0.02 1.64 16.41 0.01 0.003 0.28 2.76
Asystasia gangetica 0.11 0.02 2.24 22.40 0.02 0.004 0.36 3.64
Crassoccephalum sacrobasis 0.09 0.02 1.83 18.34 0.02 0.005 0.47 4.72
Crotalaria ochroleuca 0.05 0.01 1.01 10.13 0.01 0.003 0.29 2.90
Heterotis rotundifolia 0.06 0.01 1.23 12.26 0.01 0.002 0.19 1.89
Hibiscus cannabinus 0.04 0.01 0.86 8.61 0.01 0.002 0.20 1.96
Hibiscus sp. 0.11 0.02 2.24 22.41 0.01 0.001 0.15 1.46
Hibiscus surattensis 0.07 0.01 1.34 13.38 0.01 0.001 0.11 1.10
Ipomoea eriocarpa 0.05 0.01 0.95 9.50 0.01 0.001 0.12 1.23
Maerua angolensis 0.04 0.01 0.76 7.64 0.01 0.001 0.10 1.04
Senna obtusifolia 0.03 0.01 0.66 6.59 0.01 0.003 0.27 2.68
Vigna membranacea 0.04 0.01 0.89 8.87 0.01 0.002 0.25 2.48


RDA (mg/day)
Fe Zn
Infants 3-6 10 10
Pregnancy/Lactating mothers 15 15–22
Post-menupose/men 10 12–15

The zinc content varied between 2.36 ± 0.03 mg/100 g (dw) in C. sacrobasis to 0.52 ± 0.02 mg/100 g (dw) in M. angolensis (Table 3). Zinc concentration in fresh weight of vegetables ranges was highest in C. sacrobasis 0.005 mg. The daily intake of Zn in the wild edible plants for adults and children was 0.5 mg. The RDA values for Zn are 10 mg for infants below three years and adults, respectively. Zinc is an essential component of many enzymes participating in the synthesis and degradation of carbohydrates, lipids, proteins, and nucleic acids, as well as in the metabolism of other micronutrients [61].

The Pb concentration in the twelve vegetables varied from 1.77 ± 0.13 mg/g in C. ochroleuca to 0.87 ± 0.02 mg/g in V. membranacea (Table 4). These values are higher than 0.005–0.1 ppm (5.0 × 10-6–1 × 10-6 mg/g) reported in a study on vegetables in Jamaica [62] and the CODEX and EU limits of 0.1 mg/kg [63,64]. However, the THQ values were less than 1, implying that consumption of wild vegetables does not pose a long-term deleterious effect in children and adults. The high concentration of Pb in the edible wild plants could be due to soil contaminations from the metal residues resulting from the on-going irrational use of pesticides [65] or the use of heavy weapons during the 25 years of insurgency in the study area. Plant species in areas affected by military activities are known to accumulate heavy metals [66,67]. Another study conducted in Soroti (Eastern Uganda), an area similarly affected by armed insurrection, reported a high concentration of heavy metals in beef from cattle grazed within the area [68]. One major main limitation of our study was that we miss collecting data on the nature of the soil from which the samples were collected. This could have helped to pinpoint the sources and mechanisms by which the heavy metals entered the food chain.

Table 4.

Target Hazard Quotient (THQ) values for Lead in the wild edible vegetables.

Sample mg/g (dw) mg/g (fw) DI EDI Children THQ Adult THQ
Acalypha rhomboidea 0.01 0.002 0.197 0.0004 2.59E-05 0.0065 5.50E-06 0.0014
Asystasia gangetica 0.01 0.002 0.244 0.0006 3.98E-05 0.01 8.50E-06 0.0021
Crassoccephalum sacrobasis 0.01 0.002 0.195 0.0004 2.54E-05 0.0063 5.40E-06 0.0014
Crotalaria ochroleuca 0.02 0.004 0.354 0.0013 8.34E-05 0.0208 1.80E-05 0.0045
Heterotis rotundifolia 0.01 0.002 0.188 0.0004 2.36E-05 0.0059 5.10E-06 0.0013
Hibiscus cannabinus 0.01 0.002 0.223 0.0005 3.32E-05 0.0083 7.10E-06 0.0018
Hibiscus sp. 0.01 0.002 0.174 0.0003 2.02E-05 0.005 4.30E-06 0.0011
Hibiscus surattensis 0.01 0.001 0.139 0.0002 1.28E-05 0.0032 2.70E-06 0.0007
Ipomoea eriocarpa 0.01 0.002 0.237 0.0006 3.75E-05 0.0094 8.00E-06 0.002
Maerua angolensis 0.01 0.002 0.195 0.0004 2.54E-05 0.0063 5.40E-06 0.0014
Senna obtusifolia 0.01 0.002 0.174 0.0003 2.02E-05 0.005 4.30E-06 0.0011
Vigna membranacea 0.01 0.002 0.17 0.0003 1.93E-05 0.0048 4.10E-06 0.001

4. Conclusions and recommendations

Wild edible plants consumed in the Acholi sub-region are rich in inorganic nutrients. However, the amount consumed by the community does not meet the RDA. None of the plants contained detectable levels of Hg or Cd. All the plants contained Pb which was higher than the CODEX and EU limits (0.1 ppm/1 × 10−4 mg/g). However, the THQ of Pb in all those plants falls below the limit to cause long-term adverse effects. Therefore, consuming these edible plants does not pose a health risk of public concern to the consumer. There is need to promote use of such edible plant through local community sensitization since their consumption can contribute to attaining the RDA which is important for healthy living. Further studies are needed to quantify other inorganic components such as Se, Mn, As, and estimate their bioavailability.

Data availability statement

Data included in article/supplementary material/referenced in article.

Additional information

No additional information is available for this paper.

Author contribution statement

Alfred Nyero: Conceived and designed the experiments; Performed the experiments; Analyzed and interpreted the data; Contributed reagents, materials, analysis tools or data; Wrote the paper.

Innocent Achaye: Conceived and designed the experiments; Analysed and interpreted the data; Contributed reagents, materials, analysis tools or data; Wrote the paper.

Godwin Anywar Upoki, Geoffrey Maxwell Malinga: Conceived and designed the experiments; Analyzed and interpreted the data; Wrote the paper.

Funding

This study was funded by the African Development Bank (Gulu University Staff Development ADB-HEST Project, Grant/Award Number: P-UG-IAD-001).

Ethical approval

The study was reviewed and approved by the Gulu University Research Ethics Committee in compliance with the Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit Sharing.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to sincerely thank Mr. Rwamburindore Protase of the Makerere University Herbarium for the identification of plant specimens. All the local council personnel and the field assistants are appreciated for assistance during plant samples collection.

Abbreviations

AAS

Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer

SPSS

statistical package for social sciences

USEPA

United State Environmental Protection Agency

WHO

World Health Organisation

References

  • 1.Phillips K.W., Pehrsson P.R., Agnew W.W., Scheett A.J., Follett J.R., Lukaski H.C., Patterson K.Y. Nutrient composition of selected traditional United States Northern plains native American plant foods. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2014;34(2):136–152. doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2014.02.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ritchie H., Roser M. 2017. Micronutrient Deficiency. Our World in Data.https://ourworldindata.org/micronutrient- deficiency (03/3/2023 Accessed. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tribaldos T., Jacobi J., Rist S. Linking sustainable diets to the concept of food system sustainability. Future Food: J. Food Agric. Soc. 2018;6(1):71–84. 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Smith M.E., Coffin A.B., Miller D.L., Popper A.N. Anatomical and functional recovery of the goldfish (Carassius auratus) ear following noise exposure. J. Exp. Biol. 2006;209(21):4193–4202. doi: 10.1242/jeb.02490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Grivetti L.E., Ogle B.M. Value of traditional foods in meeting macro-and micronutrient needs: the wild plant connection. Nutr. Res. Rev. 2000;13(1):31–46. doi: 10.1079/095442200108728990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gernand A.D., Schulze K.J., Stewart C.P., West K.P., Christian P. Micronutrient deficiencies in pregnancy worldwide: health effects and prevention. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2016;12(5):274–289. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2016.37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Acipa A., Kamatenesi-Mugisha N., Oryem-Origa H. Documentation and nutritional profile of some selected food plants of Otwal and Ngai sun counties Oyam District, Northern Uganda. Afr. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 2013;13(2) doi: 10.18697/ajfand.57.10450. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Anywar G., Oryem-Origa H., Kamatenesi-Mugisha M. Wild nutriceutical plants from Nebbi district, Uganda. Eur. J. Med. Plants. 2014;4(6):641–660. doi: 10.9734/EJMP/2014/7634. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nyero A., Achaye I., Odongo W., Anywar G., Malinga G.M. Wild and semi-wild edible plants used by the communities of Acholi sub-region, Northern Uganda. Ethnobot. Res. Appl. 2021;21:1–12. https://ethnobotanyjournal.org/index.php/era/article/view/2491 Retrieved from. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nyero A., Achaye I., Anywar G.U., Malinga G.M. Phytochemical composition and antioxidant activities of some wild edible plants locally consumed by rural communities in northern Uganda. Front. Nutr. 2023:10–2023. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1070031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Anywar G., Kirimuhuzya C. Phytochemical and antibacterial activity of crude extracts of the pod of Aframomum angustifolium (Sonn.) K.Schum. Eur. J. Biol. Res. 2015;5(2):36–41. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Anywar G.U., Oryem-Origa H., Kamatenesi-Mugisha M. Proximate nutrient composition of some wild edible medicinal plants from Uganda. Afr. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 2017;17(3):12215–12226. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cantwell-Jones A., Ball J., Collar D., Diazgranados M., Douglas R., Forest F., Hawkins J., Howes M.J.R., Ulian T., Vaitla B., Pironon S. Global plant diversity as a reservoir of micronutrients for humanity. Global plant diversity as a reservoir of micronutrients for humanity. Nat. Plants. 2022;8(3):225–232. doi: 10.1038/s41477-022-01100-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Maret W. Zinc in cellular regulation: the nature and significance of “zinc signals”. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017;18(11):2285. doi: 10.3390/ijms18112285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Manzoor J., Sharma M., Wani K.A. Heavy metals in vegetables and their impact on the nutrient quality of vegetables: a review. J. Plant Nutr. 2018;41(13):1744–1763. doi: 10.1080/01904167.2018.1462382. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Shahsavani A., Fakhri Y., Ferrante M., Keramati H., Zandsalimi Y., Bay A., Hosseini Pouya S.R., Moradi B., Bahmani Z., Mousavi Khaneghah A. Risk assessment of heavy metals bioaccumulation: fished shrimps from the Persian Gulf. Toxin Rev. 2017;36(4):322–330. doi: 10.1080/15569543.2017.1312451. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Afonne O.J., Ifediba E.C. Heavy metals risks in plant foods–need to step up precautionary measures. Curr. Opin. Toxicol. 2020;22:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.cotox.2019.12.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Volpe M.G., Nazzaro M., Di Stasio M., Siano F., Coppola R., De Marco A. Content of micronutrients, mineral and trace elements in some Mediterranean spontaneous edible herbs. Chem. Cent. J. 2015;9(1):1–9. doi: 10.1186/s13065-015-0137-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ssempijja F., Kasozi K.I., Eze E.D., Tamale A., Ewuzie S.A., Matama K., Ekou J., Bogere P., Mujinya R., Musoke G.H., Atusiimirwe J.K., Zirintunda G., Kalange M., Lyada J., Kiconco R., Pius T., Nandala C., Kamugisha R.M., Hamira Y., Fernandez E.M., Musinguzi S.P. Consumption of raw herbal medicines is associated with major public health risks amongst Ugandans. J. Environ Public Health. 2020:1–10. doi: 10.1155/2020/8516105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Badea M., Luzardo O.P., González-Antuña A., Zumbado M., Rogozea L., Floroian L., Alexandrescu D., Moga M., Gaman L., Radoi M., Boada L.D. Body burden of toxic metals and rare earth elements in non-smokers, cigarette smokers and electronic cigarette users. Environ. Res. 2018;166:269–275. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hassanen E.I., Khalaf A.A.A., Zaki A.R., Ibrahim M.A., Galal M.K., Farroh K.Y., Azouz R.A. Ameliorative effect of ZnO-NPs against bioaggregation and systemic toxicity of lead oxide in some organs of albino rats. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021;28:37940–37952. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13399-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Maurya P.K., Malik D.S., Yadav K.K., Kumar A., Kumar S., Kamyab H. Bioaccumulation and potential sources of heavy metal contamination in fish species in River Ganga basin: possible human health risks evaluation. Toxicol Rep. 2019;6:472–481. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2019.05.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Obeng-Gyasi E. Sources of lead exposure in various countries. Rev. Environ. Health. 2019;34(1):25–34. doi: 10.1515/reveh-2018-0037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Schober S.E., Mirel L.B., Graubard B.I., Brody D.J., Flegal K.M. Blood lead levels and death from all causes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer: results from the NHANES III mortality study. Environ. Health Perspect. 2006;114(10):1538–1541. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Meshref A.M., Moselhy W.A., Hassan N.E.H.Y. Heavy metals and trace elements levels in milk and milk products. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2014;8(4):381–388. doi: 10.1007/s11694-014-9203-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Szymanski M. Molecular mechanisms of lead toxicity. BioTechnologia. J. Biotechnol. Comput. Biol. Bionanotechnol. 2014;95(2):137–149. doi: 10.5114/bta.2014.48856. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Naranjo V.I., Hendricks M., Jones K.S. Lead toxicity in children: an unremitting public health problem. Pediatr. Neurol. 2020;113:51–55. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2020.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Matović V., Buha A., Ðukić-Ćosić D., Bulat Z. Insight into the oxidative stress induced by lead and/or cadmium in blood, liver and kidneys. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2015;78:130–140. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2015.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Satarug S. Dietary cadmium intake and its effects on kidneys. Toxics. 2018;6(1):15. doi: 10.3390/toxics6010015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Genchi G., Sinicropi M.S., Lauria G., Carocci A., Catalano A. The effects of cadmium toxicity. Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health. 2020;17(11):3782. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Jaworowska A., Blackham T., Davies I.G., Stevenson L. Nutritional challenges and health implications of takeaway and fast food. Nutr. Rev. 2013;71(5):310–318. doi: 10.1111/nure.12031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Visconti D., Fiorentino N., G. Caporale A., Stinca A., Adamo P., Motti R., Fagnano M. Analysis of native vegetation for detailed characterization of a soil contaminated by tannery waste. Environ. Pollut. 2019;252:1599–1608. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.06.125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.World Health Organization (WHO) second ed. World Health Organization; 2004. Vitamin and Mineral Requirements in Human Nutrition.https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/42716 [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Day C.R. “Survival mode”: rebel resilience and the lord's resistance army. Terrorism Polit. Violence. 2019;31(5):966–986. doi: 10.1080/09546553.2017.1300580. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.AOAC . Association of Official Analytical Chemists. seventeenth ed. 2000. AOAC official methods of analysis. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Allowances R.D. tenth ed. National Research Council-National Academies Press; Washington, DC, USA: 1989. Recommended Dietary Allowances (RDA) [Google Scholar]
  • 37.EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) Turck D., Bresson J.L., Burlingame B., Dean T., Fairweather-Tait S., Heinonen M., Hirsch-Ernst K.I., Mangelsdorf I., McArdle H., Neuhäuser-Berthold M. Dietary reference values for potassium. EFSA J. 2016;14(10) doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4592. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Bulska E., Krata A., Kałabun M., Wojciechowski M. On the use of certified reference materials for assuring the quality of results for the determination of mercury in environmental samples. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2017;24(9):7889–7897. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-7262-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Rahmdel S., Rezaei M., Ekhlasi J., Zarei S.H., Akhlaghi M., Abdollahzadeh S.M., Mazloomi S.M. Heavy metals (Pb, Cd, Cu, Zn, Ni, Co) in leafy vegetables collected from production sites: their potential health risk to the general population in Shiraz, Iran. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2018;190(11):1–10. doi: 10.1007/s10661-018-7042-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kasozi K.I., Namubiru S., Kamugisha R., Eze E.D., Tayebwa D.S., Ssempijja F., Okpanachi A.O., Kinyi H.W., Atusiimirwe J.K., Suubo J., Fernandez E.M., Nshakira N., Tamale A. Safety of drinking water from primary water sources and implications for the general public in Uganda. J. Environ. Public. Health. 2019 doi: 10.1155/2019/7813962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.García-Rico L., Tejeda-Valenzuela L. Metal concentrations in oysters Crassostrea gigas cultured in the Gulf of California and risk assessment to human health. Expos. Health. 2020;12(1):33–39. doi: 10.1007/s12403-018-0281-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Xiong B., Xu T., Li R., Johnson D., Ren D., Liu H., Xi Y., Huang Y. Heavy metal accumulation and health risk assessment of crayfish collected from cultivated and uncultivated ponds in the Middle Reach of Yangtze River. Sci. Total Environ. 2020;739 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Thang N.Q., Huy B.T., Khanh D.N.N., Vy N.T.T., Phuong T.H., Sy D.T., Tham L.T., Phuong N.T.K. Potential health risks of toxic heavy metals and nitrate via commonly consumed bivalve and vegetable species in Ho Chi Minh City. Vietnam. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021;28(39):54960–54971. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14808-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Liu J., Luo X., Wang J., Xiao T., Chen D., Sheng G., Yin M., Lippold H., Wang C., Chen Y. Thallium contamination in arable soils and vegetables around a steel plant—a newly found significant source of Tl pollution in South China. Environ. Pollut. 2017;224:445–453. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.02.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Njuguna S.M., Makokha V.A., Yan X., Gituru R.W., Wang Q., Wang J. Health risk assessment by consumption of vegetables irrigated with reclaimed waste water: a case study in Thika (Kenya) J. Environ. Manag. 2019;231:576–581. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Nsibambi C.A.N. Body composition analysis of pupils in urban schools in Central Uganda. Int. J. Bus. Manag. Soc. Sci. 2013;4(7) [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kirunda B.E. Univ. Bergen; 2017. Body Weight and Physical Activity of Adults in Rural Uganda; pp. 1–110.http://bora.uib.no/bitstream/handle/1956/16414/dr-thesis-2017-Barbara-Eva-Kiruna.pdf?sequence=4&isAllowed=y [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Echodu R., Malinga G.M., Kaducu J.M., Ovuga E., Haesaert G. Prevalence of aflatoxin, ochratoxin and deoxynivalenol in cereal grains in northern Uganda: implication for food safety and health. Toxicol Rep. 2019;6:1012–1017. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2019.09.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.US-EPA . 2011. Exposure Factors Handbook 2011 Edition (Final)http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/risk/recordisplay.cfm?deid=236252 [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Zhang W., Zhang X., Tian Y., Zhu Y., Tong Y., Li Y., Wang X. Risk assessment of total mercury and methylmercury in aquatic products from offshore farms in China. J. Hazard Mater. 2018;354:198–205. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.04.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Amagloh F.K., Nyarko E.S. Mineral nutrient content of commonly consumed leafy vegetables in northern Ghana. Afr. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 2012;12(5):6397–6408. doi: 10.18697/ajfand.53.10840. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Faryadi Q. The magnificent effect of magnesium to human health: a critical review. Int. J. Appl. Sci. Technol. 2012;2(3):118–126. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Gröber U., Schmidt J., Kisters K. Magnesium in prevention and therapy. Nutrients. 2015;7(9):8199–8226. doi: 10.3390/nu7095388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Glasdam S.M., Glasdam S., Peters G.H. The importance of magnesium in the human body: a systematic literature review. Adv. Clin. Chem. 2016;73:169–193. doi: 10.1016/bs.acc.2015.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Sudi I.Y., Ksgbiya D.M., Muluh E.K., Clement A. Nutritional and phytochemical screening of Senna obtusifolia indigenous to Mubi, Nigeria. Adv. Appl. Sci. Res. 2011;2(3):432–437. www.pelagiaresearchlibrary.com [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Masamba K.G., Nguyen M. Determination and comparison of vitamin C, calcium and potassium in four selected conventionally and organically grown fruits and vegetables. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2008;7(16) http://www.academicjournals.org/AJB [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Pravina P., Sayaji D., Avinash M. Calcium and its role in human body. International Int. J. Res. Pharm. Biomed. Sci. 2013;4(2):659–668. www.ijrpbsonline.com [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Beto J.A. The role of calcium in human aging. Clin. Nutr. Res. 2015;4(1):1–8. doi: 10.7762/cnr.2015.4.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Aaron K.J., Sanders P.W. Role of dietary salt and potassium intake in cardiovascular health and disease: a review of the evidence. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2013;88(9):987–995. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.06.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Alaunyte I., Stojceska V., Plunkett A., Derbyshire E. Dietary iron intervention using a staple food product for improvement of iron status in female runners. J. Int. Soc. Sports Nutr. 2014;11(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12970-014-0050-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Mills C.F. Springer Science & Business Media; 2013. Zinc in Human Biology. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Antoine J.M., Fung L.A.H., Grant C.N. Assessment of the potential health risks associated with the aluminium, arsenic, cadmium and lead content in selected fruits and vegetables grown in Jamaica. Toxicol Rep. 2017;4:181–187. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2017.03.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Additives, F. Codex General Standard for Contaminants and Toxins Infood and Feed (CODEX STAN 193-1995) 1. PREAMBLE 1.1 SCOPE.
  • 64.European Union Commission Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 of 19 December 2006 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs. Off. J. Eur. Union. 2006;364:5–24. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Kasozi K.I., Namazi C., Basemera E., Atuheire C., Odwee A., Majalija S., Kateregga J.N. Inorganic pollutants in edible grasshoppers (Ruspolia nitidula) of Uganda and their major public health implications. Afr. Health Sci. 2019;19(3):2679–2691. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v19i3.44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Broomandi P., Guney M., Kim J.R., Karaca F. Soil contamination in areas impacted by military activities: a critical review. Sustainability. 2020;12(21) doi: 10.3390/su12219002. 9002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Williams O.H., Rintoul-Hynes N.L. Legacy of war: pedogenesis divergence and heavy metal contamination on the WWI front line a century after battle. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2022;73(4) doi: 10.1111/ejss.13297. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Kasozi K.I., Hamira Y., Zirintunda G., Alsharif K.F., Altalbawy F.M., Ekou J., Otim O. Descriptive analysis of heavy metals content of beef from eastern Uganda and their safety for public consumption. Front. Nutr. 2021;8 doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.592340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data included in article/supplementary material/referenced in article.


Articles from Heliyon are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES