ABSTRACT
The development of whole-genome sequencing technologies is gradually leading to a more detailed description of the population structure of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC). In this study, we correlated previously published classifications on a collection of more than 10,000 genomes and proposed a new, comprehensive nomenclature that unifies the existing ones. In total, we identified 169 lineages and sublineages of M. tuberculosis/M. africanum and 9 animal-adapted species. For the purpose of organizing these genotypes in a more streamlined manner, we stratified them into five hierarchical levels. To represent the classification and compare it with the reference, we compiled a confirmatory data set of 670 high-quality isolates, which includes all genotypes and species of MTBC, and this confirmatory data set can serve as a basis for further studies. We proposed a set of 213 robust barcoding single-nucleotide polymorphisms and a suitable workflow for reliable differentiation of genotypes and species within the complex. This work integrates the results of all the major systematized studies to date to provide an understanding of the global diversity of the MTBC population structure. The results of this work may ultimately help to reliably determine the pathogen genotype and associate it with traits that reflect its prevalence, virulence, vaccination, and treatment efficiency, as well as to reliably find natural features revealed during its spread.
IMPORTANCE
Through years of research into the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC), a number of ambiguous phylogenetic classifications have emerged, which often overlap with one another. In the present study, we have combined all major studies on MTBC classification and inferred a unified, most complete to date classification and accompanying SNP barcodes.
KEYWORDS: tuberculosis, barcoding, Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, SNPs, genotyping
OBSERVATION
The cause of tuberculosis, the MTBC, remains a pressing issue for both public health and scientists around the world. To date, nine human-adapted lineages and nine animal-adapted species have been identified within the MTBC (1,2). Several techniques have been developed for the MTBC genotyping over the years of research. However, only large sequence polymorphisms (LSPs) in regions of difference and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are the least susceptible to the effects of homoplasia and are the most suitable for phylogenetic purposes (3,4).
A landmark study on phylogenetic polymorphisms was conducted by Coll et al. in 2014 (4), and this classification was updated by Napier et al. in 2020 (1). The classification reflects the hierarchical relationship between lineages and sublineages. In order to distinguish the main phylogenetic lineages and species within the MTBC, a set of 90 validated SNPs was proposed by the authors, wherein the numbering of the main lineages corresponded to the Gagneux et al. classification published in 2006 (5), which was based on LSPs. The latter is a disadvantage of the classification, since it did not take into account additional findings of those years based on other phylogenetic markers. The limitations and shortcomings of the aforementioned classification have led to the emergence of additional barcoding and naming schemes, which often overlap with one another (6).
In order to establish a comprehensive and unified classification system for the various lineages and species within the MTBC, we conducted a rigorous cross-referencing of published studies, utilizing SNP-based genotyping. Our analysis resulted in a comprehensive MTBC classification that effectively encompasses all pertinent lineages and species. In brief, five studies were analyzed, using the Napier et al. (1) typing scheme and corresponding barcodes as the primary reference point. The discovered genotypes were validated on the exploratory data set comprising >10,000 sequenced MTBC isolates obtained from the NCBI sequence read archive (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra). To construct the most complete phylogenetic structure of the MTBC, a subset of 670 isolates was selected to represent five isolates per each genotype and animal-adapted species (if the number of isolates for a specific genotype/species was not sufficient, the rule was omitted). A system of SNP barcodes, a workflow for reliable MTBC genotyping, and a companion web app were created at the final stage (see Text S1 for comprehensive analysis details).
In total, from the previously described genotypes, we have identified 169 lineages and sublineages of M. tuberculosis/M. africanum and 9 animal-adapted species. In the resulting classification, we used a five-level system, where the first level corresponds to the main phylogenetic lineage/species, and the last level corresponds to the final phylogroup.
To represent a unified typing scheme, an aforementioned subset of the MTBC isolates (n = 670) was used, including all phylogenetic units: lineage 1 (n = 125), lineage 2 (n = 180), lineage 3 (n = 55), lineage 4 (n = 190), lineage 5 (n = 35), lineage 6 (n = 45), lineage 7 (n = 5), lineage 8 (n = 1), lineage 9 (n = 5), M. microti (n = 5), M. pinnipedii (n = 5), M. orygis (n = 5), M. bovis (n = 5), M. caprae (n = 5), M. suricattae (n = 1), M. mungi (n = 1), Dassie bacillus (n = 1), and Chimpanzee bacillus (n = 1) (Table S1). From the concatenated alignment of 42,724 high-quality genome-wide polymorphic nucleotide sites, a phylogenetic tree was inferred, which showed a structure consistent with previously published phylogenies (Fig. 1) (1,2). Furthermore, for each main lineage, a phylogenetic tree was inferred depicting a correlation with the primary Napier et al. classification (Figs. S1 through S5). The main differences between the two classifications have been described as well (Table S2).
Lineage 2 classification is the most revised one. In 2021, Thawornwattana et al. (7) presented the most comprehensive classification of lineage 2 based on the analysis of over 4,000 isolates from 34 countries. Four additional genotypes from other studies were added to the revised lineage 2 classification, in addition to the aforementioned classification. Lineage 1 and lineage 3 have also undergone extensive revision, at least three major works can be distinguished to complement the classifications of these lineages (8 - 10). In the Napier et al. study (1), the classification for lineage 5 and lineage 6 was only presented by the main lineage but was updated by introducing differentiation into sublineages in a recent work by Coscolla et al. (11). The classification remained the same as the primary one for lineage 4, for which no additional studies were published, as well as for lineage 7, lineage 8, and lineage 9, for which the number of genomes in the public databases is still quite limited. In the case of animal-adapted species, the classification was expanded to include six species that are not listed in the Napier et al. classification (1). It is noteworthy that the phylogenetic analysis of animal-adapted species exhibited similarities with previously published studies, and as a result, they were classified into four distinct clades, namely A1 through A4 (Fig. 1) (2).
Using previously published SNP schemes, we compiled a set of 213 barcoding SNPs (Table S3) for reliable differentiation of 169 M. tuberculosis/M. africanum genotypes and 5 animal-adapted species (M. mungi, M. surricattae, D. bacillus, and C. bacillus are represented by single isolates; therefore, they were not used for barcoding). Two SNPs were chosen for each genotype at the first and second levels for better reliability and false-positive exclusion. We verified these 213 barcodes using the confirmatory data set of 670 isolates. All genotypes were correctly called using the proposed barcodes (Table S1). The proposed typing scheme is available and implemented in the reproducible workflow TBvar.
We have developed a web application called TB-gen (https://tb-gen.streamlit.app/) using Streamlit (https://streamlit.io/) to improve the representation of our study results. TB-gen provides a graphical interface to explore our findings. The application includes a curated set of barcoding SNPs and a reference data set with detailed information about isolates. Additionally, phylogenies that visualize the relationships between these isolates are available within the application. Users can also barcode MTBC lineage from the variant call format (VCF) file via the “Genotype lineage” page.
Additionally, we have developed a Python-based command-line tool TbLG (https://github.com/dbespiatykh/tblg), which facilitates the classification of MTBC lineages from a VCF file. The tool employs a curated panel of reference barcoding SNPs, identified in this study, for precise lineage classification.
Taken together, we have introduced the most extensive and flexible level-based MTBC classification scheme, comprising 169 genotypes and 5 animal-adapted species. From this analysis, we identified 213 robust barcoding SNPs and created a workflow for reliable MTBC genotyping. Furthermore, we report the confirmatory data set of 670 MTBC isolates available in public databases, which can serve as a basis for further phylogenetic studies. Overall, our findings might help to more reliably associate the genotype of isolates with phylogeography and such traits of individual genotypes as the incidence of drug resistance, transmission, virulence, vaccination efficiency, and disease severity.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the RFBR (research project no. 20-04-00686) and performed using the core facilities of the LOPUKHIN FRCC PCM “Genomics, proteomics, metabolomics” (http://rcpcm.org/?p=2806).
The authors declare no competing interests.
Contributor Information
Egor Shitikov, Email: egorshtkv@gmail.com.
Dmitry Bespiatykh, Email: d.bespiatykh@gmail.com.
Lifeng Zhu, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China .
DATA AVAILABILITY
Reproducible variant calling and lineage barcoding workflow TBvar is available at GitHub (https://github.com/dbespiatykh/TBvar). TB-gen can be accessed at Streamlit cloud (https://tb-gen.streamlit.app) and at GitHub (https://github.com/dbespiatykh/TB-gen). TbLG is available at GitHub (https://github.com/dbespiatykh/tblg) and PyPI (https://pypi.org/project/tblg/).
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/msphere.00169-23.
ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.
REFERENCES
- 1. Napier G, Campino S, Merid Y, Abebe M, Woldeamanuel Y, Aseffa A, Hibberd ML, Phelan J, Clark TG. 2020. Robust barcoding and identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis lineages for epidemiological and clinical studies. Genome Med 12:114. doi: 10.1186/s13073-020-00817-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Brites D, Loiseau C, Menardo F, Borrell S, Boniotti MB, Warren R, Dippenaar A, Parsons SDC, Beisel C, Behr MA, Fyfe JA, Coscolla M, Gagneux S. 2018. A new phylogenetic framework for the animal-adapted Mycobacterium Tuberculosis complex. Front Microbiol 9:2820. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02820 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Brosch R, Gordon SV, Marmiesse M, Brodin P, Buchrieser C, Eiglmeier K, Garnier T, Gutierrez C, Hewinson G, Kremer K, Parsons LM, Pym AS, Samper S, van Soolingen D, Cole ST. 2002. A new evolutionary scenario for the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:3684–3689. doi: 10.1073/pnas.052548299 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Coll F, McNerney R, Guerra-Assunção JA, Glynn JR, Perdigão J, Viveiros M, Portugal I, Pain A, Martin N, Clark TG. 2014. A robust SNP barcode for typing Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains. Nat Commun 5:4812. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5812 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Gagneux S, DeRiemer K, Van T, Kato-Maeda M, de Jong BC, Narayanan S, Nicol M, Niemann S, Kremer K, Gutierrez MC, Hilty M, Hopewell PC, Small PM. 2006. Variable host-pathogen compatibility in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:2869–2873. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0511240103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Shitikov E, Kolchenko S, Mokrousov I, Bespyatykh J, Ischenko D, Ilina E, Govorun V. 2017. Evolutionary pathway analysis and unified classification of East Asian lineage of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Sci Rep 7:9227. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10018-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Thawornwattana Y, Mahasirimongkol S, Yanai H, Maung HMW, Cui Z, Chongsuvivatwong V, Palittapongarnpim P. 2021. Revised nomenclature and SNP barcode for Mycobacterium tuberculosis lineage 2. Microb Genom 7:000697. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000697 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Netikul T, Thawornwattana Y, Mahasirimongkol S, Yanai H, Maung HMW, Chongsuvivatwong V, Palittapongarnpim P. 2022. Whole-genome single nucleotide variant phylogenetic analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis lineage 1 in endemic regions of Asia and Africa. Sci Rep 12:1565. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05524-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Palittapongarnpim P, Ajawatanawong P, Viratyosin W, Smittipat N, Disratthakit A, Mahasirimongkol S, Yanai H, Yamada N, Nedsuwan S, Imasanguan W, Kantipong P, Chaiyasirinroje B, Wongyai J, Toyo-Oka L, Phelan J, Parkhill J, Clark TG, Hibberd ML, Ruengchai W, Palittapongarnpim P, Juthayothin T, Tongsima S, Tokunaga K. 2018. Evidence for host-bacterial Co-evolution via genome sequence analysis of 480 Thai Mycobacterium tuberculosis lineage 1 isolates. Sci Rep 8:11597. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-29986-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Shuaib YA, Utpatel C, Kohl TA, Barilar I, Diricks M, Ashraf N, Wieler LH, Kerubo G, Mesfin EA, Diallo AB, Al-Hajoj S, Ndung’u P, Fitzgibbon MM, Vaziri F, Sintchenko V, Martinez E, Viegas SO, Zhou Y, Azmy A, Al-Amry K, Godreuil S, Varma-Basil M, Narang A, Ali S, Beckert P, Dreyer V, Kabwe M, Bates M, Hoelscher M, Rachow A, Gori A, Tekwu EM, Sidze LK, Jean-Paul AA, Beng VP, Ntoumi F, Frank M, Diallo AG, Mboup S, Tessema B, Beyene D, Khan SN, Diel R, Supply P, Maurer FP, Hoffmann H, Niemann S, Merker M. 2022. Origin and global expansion of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex lineage 3. Genes 13:990. doi: 10.3390/genes13060990 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Coscolla M, Gagneux S, Menardo F, Loiseau C, Ruiz-Rodriguez P, Borrell S, Otchere ID, Asante-Poku A, Asare P, Sánchez-Busó L, Gehre F, Sanoussi CN, Antonio M, Affolabi D, Fyfe J, Beckert P, Niemann S, Alabi AS, Grobusch MP, Kobbe R, Parkhill J, Beisel C, Fenner L, Böttger EC, Meehan CJ, Harris SR, de Jong BC, Yeboah-Manu D, Brites D. 2021. Phylogenomics of Mycobacterium Africanum reveals a new lineage and a complex evolutionary history. Microb Genom 7:000477. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000477 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Reproducible variant calling and lineage barcoding workflow TBvar is available at GitHub (https://github.com/dbespiatykh/TBvar). TB-gen can be accessed at Streamlit cloud (https://tb-gen.streamlit.app) and at GitHub (https://github.com/dbespiatykh/TB-gen). TbLG is available at GitHub (https://github.com/dbespiatykh/tblg) and PyPI (https://pypi.org/project/tblg/).