Text Correction
There was an error in the original publication [1]. In the simple summary conclusion, “…to combat the antimicrobial-resistant infections” should be replaced with “…to monitor resistance trends in beef cattle”.
Table Correction
In Table 1, a correction is needed for the tetracycline resistance breakpoints: “6” should be replaced with “16”.
The authors apologize for any inconvenience this change may cause. The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected because the correction involves a typing error that was not caught during proofreading.
This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Reference
- 1.Messele Y.E., Hasoon M.F., Trott D.J., Veltman T., McMeniman J.P., Kidd S.P., Low W.Y., Petrovski K.R. Longitudinal analysis of antimicrobial resistance among Enterococcus species isolated from Australian beef cattle faeces at feedlot entry and exit. Animals. 2022;12:2690. doi: 10.3390/ani12192690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]