Skip to main content
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology logoLink to Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology
. 1998 May;5(3):348–354. doi: 10.1128/cdli.5.3.348-354.1998

Correlation between Serological and Sequencing Analyses of the PorB Outer Membrane Protein in the Neisseria meningitidis Serotyping System

Claudio T Sacchi 1,*, Ana P S Lemos 1, Anne M Whitney 2, Claude A Solari 3, Mary E Brandt 2, Carmo E A Melles 1, Carl E Frasch 4, Leonard W Mayer 2
PMCID: PMC104523  PMID: 9605990

Abstract

The current serological typing scheme for Neisseria meningitidis is not comprehensive; a proportion of isolates are not serotypeable. DNA sequence analysis and predicted amino acid sequences were used to characterize the structures of variable-region (VR) epitopes on N. meningitidis PorB proteins (PorB VR typing). Twenty-six porB gene sequences were obtained from GenBank and aligned with 41 new sequences. Primary amino acid structures predicted from those genes were grouped into 30 VR families of related variants that displayed at least 60% similarity. We correlated VR families with monoclonal antibody (MAb) reactivities, establishing a relationship between VR families and epitope locations for 15 serotype-defining MAbs. The current panel of serotype-defining MAbs underestimates by at least 50% the PorB VR variability because reagents for several major VR families are lacking or because a number of VR variants within some families are not recognized by serotype-defining MAbs. These difficulties, also reported for serosubtyping based on the PorA protein, are shown as inconsistent results between serological and sequence analyses, leading to inaccurate strain identification and incomplete epidemiological data. The information from this study enabled the expansion of the panel of MAbs currently available for serotyping, by including MAbs of previously undetermined specificities. Use of the expanded serotype panel enabled us to improve the sensitivity of serotyping by resolving a number of formerly nonserotypeable strains. In most cases, this information can be used to predict the VR family placement of unknown PorB proteins without sequencing the entire porB gene. PorB VR typing complements serotyping, and a combination of both techniques may be used for full characterization of meningococcal strains. The present work represents the most complete and integrated data set of PorB VR sequences and MAb reactivities of serogroup B and C meningococci produced to date.


Meningococcal disease has been a significant cause of mortality and morbidity throughout the world (1, 17). Most epidemiological investigations of meningococcal disease utilize classification schemes based on differences among meningococcal cell envelope molecules. All meningococci express PorB, an outer membrane porin protein (OMP); porB genes have been assigned to either class 2 or class 3 homology allele groups (11, 21). Most strains also express a class 1 OMP (9, 24), which has been named PorA; its gene is designated porA. Variations in PorB and PorA form the basis for meningococcal serotyping and serosubtyping, respectively (9). Antibodies against both proteins are bactericidal, making serotyping results useful not only for epidemiologic surveillance of meningococcal disease, but also for identifying potential vaccine components (4, 8, 19).

Several studies characterizing strains based on serosubtyping and primary structure predicted from porA gene sequencing (PorA variable-region [VR] typing), have elucidated the natures, structures, topologies, and reactivities of epitopes in VRs of PorA proteins. A new serosubtyping designation was created on the basis of differences in two VRs located in surface-exposed loops I (VR1) and IV (VR2) of PorA (14, 16, 22, 26). A similar sequence analysis of PorB proteins has shown four regions with a high level of amino acid variability, VR1 through -4, located in loops I, V, VI, and VII, respectively, of the protein (2, 4, 7, 27, 32).

The current panel of 15 serotype-defining monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) reacts with only one PorB VR in any given strain; this finding has historically been interpreted to suggest that a given strain possesses only one immunodominant epitope on the entire PorB protein. Furthermore, 20 to 60% of meningococcal B and C isolates from any given population cannot be serotyped with these reagents, a problem which could distort the serotype prevalence data in defined areas (18, 20, 25). The characterization of VR loops and recent evidence that a serotype-specific sequence can reside in any of four loops suggest that the sensitivity of serotyping could be improved through further antigenic analysis of the PorB protein.

The goal of this study was to expand the number of PorB epitopes available as discriminatory markers on meningococcal strains. This study (i) establishes the nucleotide sequences of porB genes in 41 strains, (ii) estimates the degree of variation in each of the four VRs, (iii) establishes a VR type classification scheme for the PorB protein, (iv) identifies the reactivities of all available serotyping MAbs with those strains, and (v) predicts the locations of serotype-defining MAb binding.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains.

Neisseria meningitidis strains were obtained from M. Achtman, Max-Planck-Institut fur Molekulare Genetic, Berlin, Germany; O. L. Frøholm, Statens Institute for Folkehelse (SIF), Oslo, Norway; P. Kriz, National Institute of Public Health (NIPH), Prague, Czech Republic; and F. E. Ashton, Laboratory Center for Disease Control, Tunney’s Pasture, Ottawa, Canada (Table 1). Brazilian N. meningitidis strains were recovered from blood or cerebrospinal fluid samples from patients with systemic disease in several states and cities.

TABLE 1.

Serotype, serosubtype, and PorB VR type characteristics of N. meningitidis strains analyzed

Strain Sourceh Serogroup Serotype
Serosubtypef Accession no.c PorB protein classd PorB VR typee
Originala Proposedb 1 2 3 4
Prototype strains
 M1080 FDA B 1 19,7,1 P1.7,1 X65530 3 19 Ac 7a 1
 B16B6 FDA B 2a 2a P1.5,2 X67937 2 C Eb 2a C
 2996 FDA B 2b 2b P1.5,2 X67939 2 C Ea 2b C
 2396 SIF B 2c 2c P1.5,2 U92911 2 C 2c 2bb Db
 126E SIF C 3 19,10 P1.5,2 U07191 3 19 Ac 10 14a
 Z-4008j MPIG B 4 4,7 P1.4 U59868 3 4 D 7 14a
 H-276k MPIG B 4 4,7 P1.10 U59870 3 4 D 7 14a
 M981 FDA B 4 4,7 P1− X65531 3 4 B 7 14a
 M992 FDA B 5 5 P1.7,1 U92909 2 Ca Ec 5 Ca
 M990 FDA B 6 16,6 P1.6 X67936 2 D 16 6 D
 M978 FDA B 8 19,10 P1.7,1 U07189 3 19 Aa 10 14a
 M982 FDA B 9 NT P1.9 X67938 2 C E B Da
 N.34/94 IAL B NTi 19,10 P1.4 U34194 3 19 Db 10 Aa
 M136 SIF B 11 16,11 P1− U95366 2 D 16 11 D
 S3032 SIF B 12 19,7 P1.12,16 X65534 3 19 Ab 7a A
 S3446 SIF B 14 19,14 P1.23,14 U07188 3 19 Db 7c 14
 H.44/76 SIF B 15 15 P1.7,16 X83428 3 A A A Ba
 BB393 FDA B 15 15 P1.3 U62905 3 A A A Ba
 H355 FDA B 15 15 P1.15 M68962 3 A A A B
 60E FDA C 16 16,2bg P1.7,1 U92908 2 C 16 2ba Db
 6557 FDA B 17 17,7 P1.23,14 U07190 3 B C 7 14b
 190I FDA B 18 19,10 P1.6 U07192 3 19 Aa 10 14a
 6940 FDA B 19 19,10 P1.6 U11030 3 19 Ac 10 14a
 35E SIF C 20 2c P1.1 X67940 2 C 2c 2bb Db
 M1027 FDA A 21 4,21 P1− U59869 3 (4) D 7b (21)
 503/93 NIPH B 22 NT nt U92906 2 C Ed 5a Db
Additional strains
 94010 LCDCTP C 2a 2a P1.5,2 U92907 2 C Eb 2a C
 M986 FDA B 2a 2a P1.5,2 U92912 2 C Eb 2a C
 N.446/95 IAL C 2b 2b P1.10 U92910 2 C Ea 2b C
 N.781/95 IAL C 2b 2b P1.10 U92913 2 C Ea 2b C
 N.862/95 IAL C 2b 2b nt U94962 2 C Ea 2b C
 N.1302/95 IAL B 2b 2b P1.5 U92905 2 C Ea 2b C
 N.459/93 IAL B 4 4,7 P1.7,1 U92903 3 4 Da 7 14a
 N.585/94 IAL B 4 4,7 P1.13 U92899 3 4 B 7 14a
 N.300/94 IAL B 4 4,7 P1.9 U59866 3 4 B 7 14a
 CU385 FDA B 4 4,7 P1.15 L03786 3 4 B 7 14a
 N.1281/95 IAL B 4 4,7 nt AF012017 3 4 B 7 14a
 N.150/88 IAL B 4 4,7 P1.15 U59872 3 4 D 7 14a
 N.44/89 IAL B 4 4,7 P1.15 U59871 3 4 D 7 14a
 N.155/94 IAL B 4 4,7 P1.15 U94960 3 4 D 7 14a
 N.610/93 IAL B 4 4,7 P1.15 U59867 3 4 D 7 14a
 N.314/95 IAL B 4 4,7 P1.15 AF012015 3 4 D 7 14a
 N.454/95 IAL B 4 4,7 P1.15 AF012013 3 4 D 7 14a
 N.45/95 IAL B 4 4,7 P1.15 AF012014 3 4 D 7 14a
 501 CDC B 4,15 4,15 nt AF002250 3 4 A A Ba
 N.294/97 IAL B 15 15 P1.16 AF012018 3 A A A Ba
 N.109/93 IAL B 4 4,10 P1.9 U92904 3 4b D 10 14a
 N.23/97 IAL B 4 4,10 P1.15 AF001321 3 4 D 10 14a
 N.520/95 IAL B 4 4,10 P1.15 AF012016 3 4 B 10 14c
 N.163/94 IAL B 8 19,10 P1.6 U92902 3 19 Aa 10 14a
 N.19/93 IAL B 7 7 nt U92901 3 A D 7d 14a
 N.105/93 IAL B 17 17,7 nt U92900 3 B C 7 14b
 N.1342/96 IAL B 17 17,7 P1.7,16 AF001322 3 B C 7 14b
 N.1329/96 IAL B 17 17,7 P1.7,16 AF001319 3 B C 7 14b
 N.405/94 IAL B 19 19,7,1 nt U94961 3 19 Ac 7a 1
 N.1434/96 IAL B 19 19,14 P1.23,3 AF001323 3 19 Db 7c 14
 N.1450/96 IAL B 19 19,14 P1.23,3 AF001320 3 19 Db 7c 14
 N.1454/96 IAL B 19 19,14 P1.23,3 AF001318 3 19 Db 7c 14
 N.257/93 IAL B NT NT nt U92914 2 Cb Ed C Ca
 J129 GB B 4 (4),(7)h P1.15 X67933 3 4a D 7 14a
 BB1350 GB B 4 (4),(7) UK U07193 3 4 D 7 14a
 PM36 GB B 4 (4),(7) P1.15 X79464 3 4 B 7 Bb
 PM40 GB B 4 (4),(7) P1.2 X78579 3 4 B 7 14a
 B54 GB A 4,21 (4),(21) P1.X,9 X67934 3 4 D 7b 21
 B227 GB A 4,21 (4),(21) P1.5,9 X67935 3 4 D 7b 21
 G1960 GB B 15 (15) P1.7,16 X67932 3 Aa A A Ba
 MC58 GB B 15 (15) UK X65532 3 A A A Ba
a

Original serotypes were defined by Frasch et al. (9) by using rabbit immunosera and MAbs. 

b

Proposed serotypes were characterized by dot blotting reactions using serotype-defining MAbs, including the new MAbs 7, 10, and 19 as described in the text. Because we did not have access to eight meningococcal strains from sequences obtained from the GenBank, the serotyping of those strains was not repeated in our laboratory; the serotypes based on predicted reactions with the serotype-defining MAbs are presented in parentheses. 

c

Boldface GenBank accession numbers are those for which the nucleotide sequences were determined in this work. 

d

PorB protein classes were defined by SDS-PAGE (24). 

e

PorB VR types were defined by a comparison of MAb reactivities and amino acid sequence homology as described in the text. 

f

P1−, no expression of PorA class 1 protein by SDS-PAGE; nt, nonserosubtypeable; UK, unknown serosubtype. 

g

VR3-2ba can only be detected by dot blotting using serotype-defining MAb 2b (F1-9H10/1B3) or 1082E7. 

h

MPIG, Max-Planck-Institut Fur Molekulare Genetic; LCDCTP, Laboratory Center for Disease Control, Tunney’s Pasture. GB, GenBank. 

i

NT, nonserotypeable. 

j

882066. 

k

870227. 

Serotyping.

All N. meningitidis strains were serotyped and serosubtyped by dot blotting of whole-cell suspensions (30) with all MAbs listed below. MAbs for serotypes 2a (F12-7B7/1E10), 2b (F1-9H10/1B3), 4 (F10-2H7/1F7), 7 (F22-8B5/1D10), 17 (F4-3C1/1A6), and 10 (F11-6D12/1C5) and for serosubtypes P1.4 (F11-2A9/1A4), P1.1 (F10-5G6/1B11), P1.23 (F4-1F1/1F3), and P1.15 (F8-8F12/1D6) were produced at the Adolfo Lutz Institute (IAL), São Paulo, Brazil, by the authors. MAbs for serotypes 8 (2725H6) and 15 (1951C8) and for serosubtype P1.2 (1649C7) were provided by C. E. Frasch, Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Bethesda, Md. MAbs for serotypes 2b (2H10-2), 2c (5-1-P2c), 5 (7BG5-H2), 11 (9-1-P11), and 19 (17-1-P19) and for serosubtypes P1.3 (12-1) and P1.16 (3-1-P1.16) were provided by W. D. Zollinger, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR), Washington, D.C. MAbs for serotypes 6 (MN1-B4C), 9 (MN5C10D), and 16 (93E9.1) and serosubtypes P1.6 (MN19D6-10) and P1.9 (MN5A10.7) were provided by J. T. Poolman, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. The MAb for serotype 22 (ATIA5A7/5) was provided by P. Kriz, NIPH, Prague, Czech Republic. We used an additional set of MAbs provided by the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC), Potters Barr, England, for serotypes 1 (MN3C6B-95/680), 2a (5D4-5-95/682), 2b (MN2C3B-95/684), 4 (MN14G21-95/686), 14 (MN5C8C-95/688), 15 (8B5-5-G9-95/690), and 21 (6B11-F2-B5-95/692) and for serosubtypes P1.1 (MN14C2.3-95/694), P1.2 (MN16C10F4-95/696), P1.3 (5G8B2F9-95/698), P1.4 (MN20B9.34-95/700), P1.5 (MN22A9.19-95/702), P1.7 (MN14C11.6-95/706), P1.10 (MN20F4.17-95/710), P1.12 (MN20A7.10-95/712), P1.13 (MN25H10.75-95/714), P1.14 (MN21G3.17-95/716), P1.15 (MN3C5C-95/718), and P1.16 (MN5C11G-95/720).

MAb production and characterization.

The methods used for the production of MAbs 7 and 10 were described previously (10). MAbs were prepared against N. meningitidis H-276 (870227) and N.34/94 (Table 1). The MAb class and subclass were determined by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse immunoglobulins as described by the manufacturer (mouse hybridoma subtyping kit; Boehringer Mannheim Biochemicals, Indianapolis, Ind.). The cell lines and MAbs for serotypes 7 and 10 are available by request from IAL.

Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) was performed with 12% (wt/vol) polyacrylamide gels as previously described (13). Whole-cell bacterial suspensions were boiled in sample buffer containing 2-mercaptoethanol for 5 min. After electrophoresis, either the gels were stained with Coomassie brilliant blue R-250 or proteins were transferred onto BA85 nitrocellulose (Schleicher & Schuell, Inc., Keene, N.H.). Immunoblots and dot blots were probed with appropriate dilutions of ascitic fluid (Table 1). Reactivity was visualized by using horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse immunoglobulin G, followed by the substrate 3-amino-9-ethyl-carbazole and hydrogen peroxide (30). The incubation of immunoblots with primary antibodies was performed either without detergent or with 0.25% detergent Empigen BB to restore the antibody-binding capacity of the boiled antigens (15, 29).

DNA extraction and PCR.

Cells were harvested from tryptic soy agar (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich.) containing 1% (vol/vol) horse serum into 10 ml of 0.1 M NaCl–0.05 M EDTA–0.05 M Tris, pH 8. Cells were lysed with SDS, and high-molecular-weight DNA was extracted as previously described (3). Each DNA sample was examined spectrophotometrically to determine concentration and purity.

Primers P27 and P28 were used to amplify the porB gene (7). Each final PCR mixture (50 μl) contained 0.5 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Boehringer Mannheim), template DNA at 1 ng μl−1, 10 mM Tris-Cl (pH 8), 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 200 μM (each) dATP, dCTP, dGTP, and dTTP, and 0.4 μM concentrations of each primer. Reaction mixtures were first incubated for 5 min at 95°C. Then 5 cycles were performed as follows: 1 min at 94°C, 2 min at the annealing temperature of 60°C, and 20 s at 72°C; this was followed by 25 cycles of 30 s at 90°C, 20 s at 60°C, and 20 s at 72°C. Reaction mixtures were then incubated at 72°C for a further 5 min. PCR products were purified with the High Pure PCR product purification kit (Boehringer Mannheim).

Sequences of porB genes.

For sequencing the porB genes encoding the class 3 protein, 14 primers were used (6 forward and 8 reverse), and for sequencing the porB genes encoding the class 2 protein, 11 primers were used (6 forward and 5 reverse). The primers were designed to be complementary to the conserved regions of the porB gene (Table 2). Sequencing was performed by using the Taq Dye-deoxy terminator cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.). Sequencing products were purified by using Centri-Sep spin columns (Princeton Separations, Adelphia, N.J.) and resolved on a 5% acrylamide–8 M urea gel with an Applied Biosystems model 373S automated DNA sequencing system. DNA sequences obtained from these reactions were aligned and edited, and consensus sequences were determined with the University of Wisconsin Genetics Computer Group (GCG) package. When a new nucleotide sequence for any VR was found, the porB gene amplification and sequencing were repeated once.

TABLE 2.

Nucleotide sequences of primers used for porB gene amplification and sequencing

Primera Nucleotide sequence
porB gene
 (F) P27 TTG TAC GGT ACA ATT AAA GCA GGC GT
 (R) P28 TTA GAA TTT GTG ACG CAG ACC AAC
Class 2 protein-encoding porB gene
 (F) 2F327 GGG TAC TAT CGG TCG TGT AGA AAG
 (F) 2F657 GTA CGT TTC TGT TGC CGG TCA G
 (F) 2F505 GCC GGT TTC TTC GGT CAA TAC GCA G
 (F) 2F476 CTT ACC ACG CCG GTC TGA AAT ACG
 (F) 2F777 CGT AAC GCC TCG CGT TTC TTA CGC
 (R) 2R327 CTT TCT ACA CGA CCG ATA GTA CCC
 (R) 2R177 GAC TGG CGG TTA CCC CAG CCG CTG
 (R) 2R476 CGT ATT TCA GAC CGG CGT GGT AAG
 (R) 2R777 GCG TAA GAA ACG CGA GGC GTT ACG
Class 3 protein-encoding porB gene
 (F) 273 CGA CAT CAA TCC TTG GGA TAG C
 (F) 392 GCG TAC AAT ACG CGC TTA ACG A
 (F) 685 CGC TTC GGC AAC GTA ACG CCC C
 (F) 731 CGA CAA TGA TGC CCT GTA C
 (F) 651 GGC GGT GCC TAT AAA AGA CAT
 (R) 439 GTA GCG TAC GGA AAT GAG GCG
 (R) C3RVR1 CGG TTT GAG AGT TGT GCG
 (R) 714 GGT GAA TCT GGT ATT TCT CAA T
 (R) 294 GCT ATC CCA AGG ATT GAT GTC G
 (R) 414 GTC GTT AAG CGC GTA TTG TAC G
 (R) 700 TTA CGT TGC CGA AGC GGT ATG C
 (R) 202 GTT ACC GAG GTC TTC TTG GCC
a

Primers P27 and P28 were used to amplify the porB gene (7). Primer C3RVR1 was described previously (32). (F) and (R), forward and reverse orientations of primers, respectively, in relation to the direction of gene transcription. 

Twenty-six porB gene nucleotide sequences were obtained from GenBank and aligned with the 41 new sequences by using GCG sequence analysis software (5). Amino acid alignments were obtained by translating the nucleotide sequences that had been aligned such that codons were in frame. Distance matrices were calculated by using the Distances program of the GCG package (5). An exact amino acid match was scored as 1.5, and any other residue was scored as 0.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

The sequences of porB genes obtained during the study have been submitted to the GenBank database and have been assigned the accession numbers listed in Table 1.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

MAb production and characterization.

We produced two new MAbs, F22-8B5/1D10 (IgG2aκ) and F11-6D12/1C5 (IgG2bκ). We characterized these and a third MAb, 17-1-P19 (IgG2bκ), by dot blotting and Western blotting with all strains in Table 1 as antigens. Our results were consistent with those of Tsai et al. (24) in defining the PorB classes for these strains. The dot blot results with these 3 new MAbs in addition to the currently used panel of 15 serotyping MAbs are presented in Table 1 (Proposed serotypes column). The three new MAbs recognized only PorB class 3 proteins and failed to react with any class 2 PorB proteins. Western blotting results with 37 strains known to express class 3 proteins showed that these MAbs bound only in the presence of the detergent Empigen BB (Calbiochem-Novabiochem Corp., La Jolla, Calif.), verifying that the MAb reactivity had been restored. No discrepancies between the two methods were found.

We have renamed MAb F22-8B5/1D10 MAb 7 and have renamed MAb F11-6D12/1C5 MAb 10 to fill the gaps in the serotype scheme designations. MAb 17-1-P19 was renamed MAb 19 since it was developed against the prototype 19 serotype reference strain (32a).

porB gene analysis.

To identify PorB amino acid sequences associated with serotype-defining MAb epitopes, we sequenced 41 porB genes (Table 1) and obtained 26 additional porB sequences from GenBank. The alignment of 67 predicted PorB amino acid sequences identifies the 4 PorB VR sequences on loops I, V, VI, and VII according to the structural model of class 2 and 3 OMPs (26). A distance matrix of amino acid sequences for each of the four VRs identified 60 distinct VR types (11, 16, 17, and 16 different VR types in VR1 to -4, respectively; Table 3).

TABLE 3.

Characteristics of porB gene VR nucleotide sequences, PorB protein VR families, and types of N. meningitidis

Loop PorB VR typea PorB protein classb Reactivity with serotype-defining MAbc Strain Sequenced
Accession no.
VR nucleotides VR amino acids
124                           156 42       52
I VR1-4 3 + M981 GAGCACAATGGAGGTCAGGTGGTTAGCGTTGAA EHNGGQVVSVE X65531
VR1-[4] 3 + M1027 ..A.............................. ........... U59869
VR1-4a 3 (+) J129 ........G........................ ..K........ X67933
VR1-4b 3 + N.109/93 A................................ K.......... U92904
VR1-19 3 + 6940 GCTCACAATGGAGCTCAGGCGGCTAGCGTTGAA AHNGAQAASVE U11030
VR1-A 3 NAA H355 TTTCACCAGAACGGCCAAGTTACTGAAGTTACA FHQNGQVTEVT M68962
VR1-Aa 3 NAA G1960 ..............................G.. ..........A X67932
VR1-B 3 NAA 6557 TATTACGAAGACGGCAAAGCTGCTGAAGTTACA YYEDGKAAEVT U07190
19                               54 7        18
VR1-C 2 NAA B16B6 GATGCTGGTACATATAAAGCTCAAGGCGGAAAATCT DAGTYKAQGGKS X67937
VR1-Ca 2 NAA M992 .......C...........A................ ..A...D..... U92909
VR1-Cb 2 NAA N.257/93 .......A............................ ..D......... U92914
VR1-D 2 NAA M990 AATCAAGGCGTAAAAACC NQGVKT X67936
610                  633 204  211
V VR2-A 3 NAA H355 CATCAAGTGCAAGAGGGCTTGAAT HQVQEGLN M68962
VR2-Aa 3 NAA M978 ........A.......A....... .....D.. U07189
VR2-Ab 3 NAA S3032 ....G...........A.A.A... .R...DI. X65534
VR2-Ac 3 NAA M1080 ...............AA.G..... .....NV. X65530
VR2-B 3 NAA M981 GTGCGGGTGGATGAGAACGTGAAT VRVDENVN X65531
VR2-C 3 NAA 6557 GAGCAGATAGATAACGTGAAG EQIDNVK U07190
VR2-D 3 NAA J129 CAGGATGTGGATGACGTGAAG QDVDDVK X67933
VR2-Da 3 NAA N.459/93 .........A........... ...N... U92903
VR2-Db 3 NAA N.34/94 ...A........A........ .N..N.. U34194
556                                          603 186          201
VR2-2c 2 + 2396 AACACTGATGCAGAACGTGTTGCAGTAGGTGCTACAGATGCCAATCCT NTDAERVAVGATDANP U92911
VR2-16 2 + 60E AACAAGGATGCAGAACGTGTTGCAGCAGGTACTTCAGGTGCCTATGCT NKDAERVAAGTSGAYA U92908
VR2-E 2 NAA M982 AACAATGATGCAGAACGTGTTGCAGTAAATACTCCAAATGCCCATGCT NNDAERVAVNTPNAHA X67938
VR2-Ea 2 NAA 2996 ..AG..A..........................G...........C.. KDN........A...P X67939
VR2-Eb 2 NAA B16B6 ....C............................G...........C.. .T.........A...P X67937
VR2-Ec 2 NAA M992 ...G.............................A.............. .D.........T.... U92909
VR2-Ed 2 NAA N.257/93 ..AG.TA.......G............GG....A..GG.......C.. KDN......G.TG..P U92914
727         741 243 247
VI VR3-7 3 + H-276 GTTGAAGACAATTAT VEDNY U59870
VR3-7a 3 + S3032 ........A...... ..E.. X65534
VR3-7b 3 B54 ............––– ....– X67934
VR3-7c 3 S3446 ...A........––– .K..– U07188
VR3-7d 3 + N.19/93 ...A........... .K... U92901
VR3-10 3 + N.34/94 GCTTTGCCAAACGACAAT ALPNDN U34194
VR3-A 3 NAA H355 ACTGATGCTTCCAAT TDASN M68962
694                  717 232   239
VR3-2a 2 + B16B6 AACAACGAGGTTGGTTCTACCAAG NNEVGSTK X67937
VR3-2b 2 + 2996 AATAACACTGGTACTGTCGGCAAACAA NNTGTVGKQ X67939
VR3-2ba 2 −/+ 60E .....................G..... .......E. U92908
VR3-2bb 2 35E ..........T..G.......G..... ...VS..E. X67940
VR3-5 2 + M992 AACAACGACGGTTCTGCCAATAAT NNDGSANN U92909
VR3-5a 2 503/93 ........T...A........C.A ....T..Q U92906
VR3-6 2 + M990 CAA Q X67936
VR3-11 2 + M136 AACAACGAAGGTGCTGCTAAACAA NNEGAAKQ U95366
VR3-B 2 NAA M982 AACAACGAGGTTGGTAATCTCAATATT NNEVGNLNI X67938
VR3-C 2 NAA N.257/93 AATAACACCGGTGTTGCCGCCGATCAA NNTGVAADQ U92914
835                        864 279    288
VII VR4-1 3 + M1080 TCGTTTGATGCTACAAACTACAACAACGAT SFDATNYNND X65530
VR4-14 3 + S3446 TCGTTTGATGATGCAGACTACACCAACGAT SFDDADYTND U07188
VR4-14a 3 M978 ...................TA.G....... ......LS.. U07189
VR4-14b 3 6557 ..................CG.TA...TAC. ......RY.T U07190
VR4-14c 3 N.520/95 .........A.........TA.G....... ...N..LS.. AF01201
VR4-21 3 + M1027 TCGGTTGATGATGCAAAACGCGACAATACT SVDDAKRDNT U59869
VR4-[21] 3 + B54 ..A........................... .......... X67934
VR4-Ae 3 NAA S3032 TTGGTTGATAGTGCAGACTACACCAACGAT LVDSADYTND X65534
VR4-Aa 3 NAA N.34/94 ...................TA.G....... ......LS.. U34194
VR4-B 3 NAA H355 TTGGTTGATAATGCAGACATAGGCAACGAA LVDNADIGNE M68962
VR4-Ba 3 NAA MC58 .........G.................... ...D...... X65532
VR4-Bb 3 NAA PM36 .C.T.......................... SF........ X79464
826         840 277 281
VR4-C 2 NAA B16B6 GTGAAAGACGCAAAT VKDAN X67937
VR4-Ca 2 NAA M992 .............G. ....S U92909
VR4-D 2 NAA M990 GAGAAAGTAGCACGT EKVAR X67936
VR4-Da 2 NAA M982 .......C....... ..A.. X67938
VR4-Db 2 NAA 35E A......C....... K.A.. X67940
a

PorB VR types were defined by comparison of MAb reactivities and amino acid sequence similarity as described in the text. Brackets indicate that nucleotide sequence differences produce no amino acid changes with respect to the prototype. 

b

PorB protein classes were defined by SDS-PAGE (24). 

c

Reactivity with serotype-defining MAbs was evaluated by dot blotting and immunoblotting reactions; the results were 100% concordant. Immunoblot reactions were positive only in the presence of detergent Empigen BB. +, positive reaction; −, negative reaction; −/+, the reaction can be negative or positive depending on the MAb used; see text. Parentheses indicate that the reactivity is not based in experimental evidence but rather is predicted. NAA, no antibody available. 

d

The numbers above the sequences refer to the nucleotide or amino acid VR position, based on the porB gene sequence of B16B6 strain for the class 2 protein and S3032 strain for the class 3 protein; conserved regions of the loops were not considered part of the VRs. –, nucleotide or amino acid deletion; ., nucleotide or amino acid identical to that of the prototype. 

e

For serotype 12, the corresponding epitope is most probably VR4-A(2), but since there is no MAb 12 available, we did not consider this designation. 

VR families and VR typing.

Type and subtype (identified by letters) were defined as the VR types for PorB and PorA proteins, respectively (23). Serotype and serosubtype were defined solely by MAb reactivity with PorB and PorA proteins, respectively, and were designated by numbers (except for the serotypes 2a, 2b, and 2c). Numbers were reserved for epitopes defined by MAbs, while letters were used for those VR sequences for which no MAbs are currently available.

The 60 VR types were grouped into 30 amino acid sequence families, similar to those described for PorA proteins (22), except that a 60% cutoff was used. Each VR type is a member of a family of related variants that displayed at least 60% amino acid sequence similarity to the prototype. VR families were designated by sequential capital letters for each VR; however, when a particular VR family was established as the epitope for a serotype-defining MAb, the VR family name was the same as that of the MAb recognizing that region (numbers). A prototype for each VR family was defined as the amino acid sequence of the appropriate VR present in the original strain providing the antigen to produce the MAb. For a VR family not recognized by any available MAb, the prototype was defined as the amino acid sequence of the appropriate VR in the strain first analyzed (Table 3). Amino acid sequences within a VR family were distinguished from those of the prototype VR and other variants by lowercase letters given in the order of elucidation (e.g., 7, 7a or A, Aa); however, since the detection of those variants was not made by immunochemical reactions, we used the additional letters only as part of the VR typing system and not as part of the serotyping designation. A VR amino acid sequence variant with less than 60% sequence relatedness to the prototype of any VR family was assigned to a new VR family, in order of elucidation. When nucleotide changes produced no difference in the amino acid sequence, the same prototype letter or number designation was placed in brackets, e.g., VR type A, [A]; VR type 4, [4].

Relationships between MAb reactivity and PorB VR family.

The comparison of all available serotype-defining MAb reactivities and amino acid sequences of VR families is presented in Table 3. All strains of a given serotype possessed amino acid sequences characteristic of their respective family at the epitope-defining VR; only strains with amino acid sequences at least 60% related (same family) in the same VR reacted with a particular MAb. We then correlated VR families with MAb reactivities, establishing a relationship between VR families and epitope locations for all serotype-defining MAbs (Table 3). In most cases, a sequence change in one VR loop occurred independently of changes in any other loops. Some exceptions were noted; for example, VR2-B or VR2-D was almost exclusively present in combination with VR1-4.

A comparison of PorB amino acid sequences and serological results permitted a rational reassignment of serotype designations as well as a determination of probable epitope locations for serotype-defining MAbs. The serotype characterization of an unknown meningococcal strain included a determination of epitope reactivities at regions VR1, VR2, VR3, and VR4 when MAbs were available for those epitopes. For example, the serotype designation 19,7,1 for strain M1080 indicates the PorB protein with sequences of VR family 19 in VR1 (VR1-19), VR family 7 in VR3 (VR3-7), and VR family 1 in VR4 (VR4-1). There is no available MAb for VR family A on VR2 (VR2-A) (Tables 1 and 3). Since serotyping becomes a summation of up to four results, we have expanded the definition of serotyping to include the immunological characterization of VR1 to -4 of the meningococcal PorB protein.

The probable epitope location for serotype 15 strains could most likely have been identified as VR1, VR3, or VR4 by using nucleotide probes (2). Our porB nucleotide sequence and the immunological results for meningococcal strain 501 showed that the epitope location for serotype 15 was not VR1. Strain 501 has VR1-4 and reacted by dot blotting and Western blotting with serotype-defining MAbs 4 and 15. For serotype 17, the probable epitope location could most likely have been VR1 or VR2. Additional studies are necessary to locate the VR epitope for serotype-defining MAb 15 within either VR2-A, VR3-A, or VR4-B and to locate that for serotype-defining MAb 17 within either VR1-B or VR2-C of the PorB class 3 protein (Table 1).

We determined 14 previously unknown epitope locations by correlating VR types with MAb reactivities: serotype 1 (VR4-1), serotype 2a (VR3-2a), serotype 2b (VR3-2b), serotype 2c (VR2-2c), serotype 4 (VR1-4), serotype 5 (VR3-5), serotype 6 (VR3-6), serotype 7 (VR3-7), serotype 10 (VR3-10), serotype 11 (VR3-11), serotype 14 (VR4-14), serotype 16 (VR2-16), serotype 19 (VR1-19), and serotype 21 (VR4-21) (Table 1).

Epitope mapping studies of PorA proteins have shown that a single amino acid change may or may not modify recognition by the relevant serosubtype antibody (16, 22, 23, 28, 31). A similar effect was observed with PorB proteins and serotype-defining MAbs. For example, amino acid substitutions in VR1-4a and VR1-4b were not close to the apex on loop I, and reactivity with serotype-defining MAb 4 was not affected. On the other hand, serotype-defining MAb 7 reacts with VR3-7, VR3-7a, and VR3-7d strains but not with VR3-7b or VR3-7c isolates, where a tyrosine on the top of loop VI has been deleted (Table 3).

We also observed differences in specificity between serotype-defining MAbs produced by different laboratories. The VR3-2b family possesses three VR types: VR3-2b, VR3-2ba, and VR3-2bb. The difference between VR3-2b and VR3-2ba is a lysine-to-glutamic acid substitution on the top of loop VI. For two serotype 2b MAbs, F1-9H10/1B3 (IAL) and 1082E7 (FDA), the substitution did not abolish antibody binding in dot blot reactions, while serotype-defining MAbs MN2C3B (NIBSC) and 2H10-2 (WRAIR) failed to react with VR3-2ba strains.

Serotypes to be removed.

An analysis of results in Table 1 suggested that new MAbs 7, 10, and 19 identify epitopes on class 3 proteins that are shared among some meningococcal strains of different serotypes. In the past these MAbs would have been disqualified because the previous dogma stated that each serotype-defining MAb should recognize only one serotype. For this reason, serotype-defining MAbs 2c and 16 have not been considered suitable for serotyping. Since we now appreciate that a given MAb can recognize a VR common to several serotypes, these MAbs can be incorporated and used to improve the sensitivity and discriminatory power of serotyping (Table 1). New serotype-defining MAbs and VR sequences can be easily identified and incorporated into the system by using Tables 1 and 3. Epitope-predicted sequence information can be used as a guide for future serotype-defining MAb production.

Some reference strains, previously defined as having different serotypes, have identical VR amino acid sequences, or VR types, at all four VRs of their PorB proteins (Table 1). One example is serotypes 2c and 20, and another is serotypes 3, 8, 18, and 19 (2; this study). The VR sequences for serotypes 8 and 18 are identical at all four VRs, as are those for serotypes 3 and 19. Serotypes 3 and 19 are identical to serotypes 8 and 18 at VR1, -3, and -4, but they differ by two amino acids at VR2. It is not clear whether this difference of two amino acids is sufficient to generate an epitope that could discriminate these two serosubtypes (Tables 1 and 3). In addition, serotype-defining MAb 8 failed to recognize any PorB protein epitope by Western blotting and was not further considered. It should be noted that the type 8 MAb reactivity may be to a very conformational epitope that requires more renaturing than usually occurs even with Empigen BB. We suggest keeping serotypes 2c and 19, since specific MAbs for these prototypes are available, and removing from the serotype scheme serotypes 3, 8, 18, and 20.

The MAb defining new serotype 22 (12) recognized the prototype strain by dot blotting and the corresponding PorB class 2 protein by immunoblotting. Because the PorB VR sequences of the prototype strain are VR1-C, VR2-Ed, and VR4-Db, we predict that MAb 22 would react with similar PorB VR sequences such as those present on strains B16B6, N.257/93, and 60E (Table 1). However, MAb 22 failed to react with any of these strains, suggesting that MAb 22 may not be directed against any of the four VRs of PorB. Since we are basing the serotype system on reactivity with PorB VR epitopes, we dropped this serotype from consideration.

Two MAbs failed to recognize strains of reported homologous specificities. MAb MN14G21 (serotype-defining MAb 4) did not recognize any of the serotype 4 strains listed in Table 3 with the exception of strain M1027; on the other hand, MAb MN5C10D (serotype-defining MAb 9) reacted in dot blots with whole-cell suspensions from all strains listed in Table 3. We did not analyze these MAbs further.

Serotyping versus PorB VR typing.

The 30 PorB VR families are observed on both class 2 (14 families) and class 3 (16 families) proteins. The current MAb panel identifies only 50 and 25% of these families, respectively. With the addition of the three new MAbs (MAbs 7, 10, and 19), we were able to identify 44% of the PorB class 3 protein families (Table 3).

To examine the effects of the serotyping panel expansion on serotyping sensitivity, we tested 113 nonserotypeable strains expressing the class 3 PorB, which represented 11% of 1,047 meningococcal strains isolated in Brazil during 1994. The percentage of nonserotypeable strains was reduced to 3% (n = 31) when the three new MAbs were added to the 13-member serotyping panel (MAbs 1, 2a, 2b, 2c, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19, and 21). We believe that the preparation and characterization of additional MAbs for serotyping will increase the discriminatory power of this system further.

PorB VR typing is important to characterize the precise structures of VR epitopes on PorB molecules. These data demonstrate that the current panel of MAbs underestimates this variability by at least 50% because reagents for several major VR families are lacking or because a number of VR types are not recognized by serotype-defining MAbs. These difficulties, also reported for serosubtyping (6), are shown as inconsistent results between serological and sequence analyses, leading to inaccurate strain identification and incomplete epidemiological data.

In addition to its importance for epidemiological analysis and classification, serology is the most practical method to screen large numbers of samples during epidemics or to screen samples in field situations where specialized equipment is not accessible. PorB and PorA sequencing (VR typing) can be done only in specialized laboratories, is not currently practical for large numbers of samples, and is laborious and expensive. These concerns warrant improvements in serology systems based upon the production of new MAbs, based in turn on the use of VR sequence data such as that presented here.

In conclusion, we determined that the reactivities of serotype-defining MAbs could be correlated with PorB VR sequences. This information enabled us to expand the panel of MAbs currently available for serotyping by including MAbs of previously undetermined specificities. Use of the expanded serotype panel enabled us to improve the sensitivity of serotyping by resolving a number of formerly nonserotypeable strains. Furthermore, this information can be used to predict the family placement of unknown PorB proteins, without sequencing the entire porB gene. PorB VR typing complements serotyping results, and a combination of both techniques may be used to fully characterize meningococcal strains. The present work represents the most complete and integrated set of PorB VR sequences and MAb reactivities of meningococci produced to date.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank J. Suker of the NIBSC and L. O. Frøholm of the SIF for the provision of MAbs used in this work. We also thank W. D. Zollinger, WRAIR, and G. Carlone, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga., for providing serotype-defining MAb 19 (17-1-P19) and serotype-defining MAbs 5 (7BG5-H2) and 11 (9-1-P11), respectively. We are grateful to M. C. Bash for critically reading the manuscript.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Achtman M. Epidemic spread and antigenic variability of Neisseria meningitidis. Trends Microbiol. 1995;3:186–192. doi: 10.1016/s0966-842x(00)88918-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bash M C, Lesiak K B, Banks S D, Frasch C E. Analysis of Neisseria meningitidis class 3 outer membrane protein gene variable regions and type identification using genetic techniques. Infect Immun. 1995;63:1484–1490. doi: 10.1128/iai.63.4.1484-1490.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Brenner D J, McWhorter A C, Knutson J K L, Steigerwalt A G. Escherichia vulneris: a new species of Enterobacteriaceae associated with human wounds. J Clin Microbiol. 1982;15:1103–1140. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.6.1133-1140.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Butcher S, Sarvas M, Runeberg-Nyman K. Class-3 porin protein of Neisseria meningitidis: cloning and structure of the gene. Gene. 1991;105:125–128. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(91)90523-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Devereux J P, Haeberli P, Smithies O. A comprehensive set of sequence analysis programs for the VAX. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984;12:387–395. doi: 10.1093/nar/12.1part1.387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Feavers I M, Fox A J, Gray S, Jones D M, Maiden M C J. Antigenic diversity of meningococcal outer membrane protein PorA has implications for epidemiological analysis and vaccine design. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1996;3:444–450. doi: 10.1128/cdli.3.4.444-450.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Feavers I M, Suker J, McKenna A J, Heath A B, Maiden M C J. Molecular analysis of the serotyping antigens of Neisseria meningitidis. Infect Immun. 1992;60:3620–3629. doi: 10.1128/iai.60.9.3620-3629.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Frasch C E, Peppler M S. Protection against group B Neisseria meningitidis disease: preparation of soluble proteins and protein-polysaccharide immunogens. Infect Immun. 1982;37:271–280. doi: 10.1128/iai.37.1.271-280.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Frasch C E, Zollinger W D, Poolman J T. Serotype antigens of Neisseria meningitidis and a proposed scheme for designation of serotypes. Rev Infect Dis. 1985;7:504–510. doi: 10.1093/clinids/7.4.504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Harlow E, Lane D. Antibodies: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory; 1988. pp. 139–318. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hitchcock P J. Unified nomenclature for pathogenic Neisseria species. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1989;2:S64–S65. doi: 10.1128/cmr.2.suppl.s64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Krizova P, Musilek M, Danielova V, Holubova J. New serotype candidate of Neisseria meningitidis. Cent Eur J Public Health. 1996;4:169–172. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Laemmli U K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature (London) 1970;227:680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Maiden M C, Suker J, McKenna A J, Bygraves J A, Feavers I M. Comparison of the class 1 outer membrane proteins of eight serological reference strains of Neisseria meningitidis. Mol Microbiol. 1991;5:727–736. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1991.tb00743.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mandrell R E, Zollinger W D. Use of a zwitterionic detergent for the restoration of the antibody-binding capacity of electroblotted meningococcal outer membrane proteins. J Immunol Methods. 1984;67:1–11. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(84)90080-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.McGuinness B T, Lambden P R, Heckels J E. Class 1 outer membrane protein of Neisseria meningitidis: epitope analysis of the antigenic diversity between strains, implications for subtype definition and molecular epidemiology. Mol Microbiol. 1993;7:505–514. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb01141.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Peltola H. Meningococcal disease: still with us. Rev Infect Dis. 1983;5:71–91. doi: 10.1093/clinids/5.1.71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sacchi C T, Lemos A P S, Gorla M C O, Frasch C E. Monoclonal antibody to serotype 17 of Neisseria meningitidis and its prevalence in Brazilian states. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 1995;37:1–5. doi: 10.1590/s0036-46651995000100001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Saukkonen K, Abdillahi H, Poolmam J T, Leinonem M. Protective efficacy of monoclonal antibodies to class 1 and 3 outer membrane proteins of Neisseria meningitidis B:15:P1.16 in infant rat infection model: new prospects for vaccine development. Microb Pathog. 1987;3:261–267. doi: 10.1016/0882-4010(87)90059-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Scholten R J P M, Bijlmer H A, Poolman J T, Kuipers B, Caugant D A, Alphen L V, Dankert J, Valkenburg H A. Meningococcal disease in The Netherlands, 1958–1990: a steady increase in the incidence since 1982 partially caused by new serotypes and subtypes of Neisseria meningitidis. Clin Infect Dis. 1993;16:237–246. doi: 10.1093/clind/16.2.237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Smith N H, Smith J M, Spratt B G. Sequence evolution of the porB gene of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Neisseria meningitidis: evidence of positive Darwinian selection. Mol Biol Evol. 1995;12:363–370. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Suker J, Feavers I M, Achtman M, Morelli G, Wang J-F, Maiden M C J. The porA gene in serogroup A meningococci: evolution stability and mechanism of genetic variation. Mol Microbiol. 1994;12:253–265. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb01014.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Suker J, Feavers I M, Maiden M C J. Monoclonal antibody recognition of members of the meningococcal P1.10 variable region family: implications for serological typing and vaccine design. Microbiology. 1996;142:63–69. doi: 10.1099/13500872-142-1-63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tsai C M, Frasch C E, Mocca L F. Five structural classes of major outer membrane proteins in Neisseria meningitidis. J Bacteriol. 1981;146:69–78. doi: 10.1128/jb.146.1.69-78.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tzanakaki G, Blackwell C C, Kremastinou J, Weir D M, Mentis A, Fallon R J. Serogroups, serotypes and subtypes of Neisseria meningitidis isolated from patients and carriers in Greece. J Med Microbiol. 1993;38:19–22. doi: 10.1099/00222615-38-1-19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.van der Ley P, Heckels J E, Virji M, Hoogerhout P, Poolman J T. Topology of outer membrane porins in pathogenic Neisseria spp. Infect Immun. 1991;59:2963–2971. doi: 10.1128/iai.59.9.2963-2971.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ward M J, Lambden P R, Heckels J E. Sequence analysis and relationships between meningococcal class 3 serotype protein and other porins from pathogenic and nonpathogenic Neisseria species. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1992;94:283–290. doi: 10.1016/0378-1097(92)90644-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wedege E, Dalseg R, Caugant D A, Poolman J T, Frøholm L O. Expression of an inaccessible P1.7 subtype epitope on meningococcal class 1 proteins. J Med Microbiol. 1993;38:23–28. doi: 10.1099/00222615-38-1-23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wedege E, Frøholm L O. Restoration of antibody binding to blotted meningococcal outer membrane proteins using various detergents. J Immunol Methods. 1988;113:51–59. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(88)90381-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wedege E, Høiby E A, Rosenqvist E, Frøholm L O. Serotyping and subtyping of Neisseria meningitidis isolates by co-agglutination, dot-blotting and ELISA. J Med Microbiol. 1990;31:195–201. doi: 10.1099/00222615-31-3-195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wedege E, Kolberg J, Delvig A, Høiby E A, Holten E, Rosenqvist E, Caugant D A. Emergence of a new virulent clone within the electrophoretic type 5 complex of serogroup B meningococci in Norway. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1995;2:314–321. doi: 10.1128/cdli.2.3.314-321.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zapata G A, Vann W F, Rubinstein Y, Frasch C E. Identification of variable region differences in Neisseria meningitidis class 3 protein sequences among five group B serotypes. Mol Microbiol. 1992;6:3493–3499. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1992.tb01784.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32a.Zollinger, W. D. Personal communication.

Articles from Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES