Skip to main content
The British Journal of Venereal Diseases logoLink to The British Journal of Venereal Diseases
. 1977 Apr;53(2):121–122. doi: 10.1136/sti.53.2.121

Yeasts and circumcision in the male.

F Davidson
PMCID: PMC1045367  PMID: 322822

Abstract

Sixty-six circumcised men and 69 uncircumcised men, both heterosexual and homosexual, had specimens taken from the coronal sulcus and meatus of the penis. Yeasts were isolated at similar rates in both the circumcised (14%) and uncircumcised (17%) men. The circumcised men had significantly fewer symptoms (P = 0-0058). Therefore the female partners of both circumcised and uncircumcised men are exposed to similar rates of yeast infection despite the absence of symptoms in circumcised men. Eighty per cent of the female contacts of yeast-positive men had yeast infection while 32% of the contacts of yeast-negative men were affected. This difference was statistically significant (0-05 greater than P greater than 0-025). Men with non-specific genital infection seemed more likely to carry yeasts than men with gonorrhoea or normal men.

Full text

PDF
121

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Hilton A. L., Warnock D. W. Vaginal candidiasis and the role of the digestive tract as a source of infection. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1975 Nov;82(11):922–926. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1975.tb00599.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Oates J. K., Selwyn S., Breach M. R. Polyester sponge swabs to facilitate examination for genital infection in women. Br J Vener Dis. 1971 Aug;47(4):289–292. doi: 10.1136/sti.47.4.289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Rodin P., Kolator B. Carriage of yeasts on the penis. Br Med J. 1976 May 8;1(6018):1123–1124. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6018.1123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Venereal Diseases are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES