Skip to main content
Science Progress logoLink to Science Progress
. 2021 Apr 29;104(2):00368504211013247. doi: 10.1177/00368504211013247

Pathologies associated with the mandibular third molar impaction

Zhou-Xi Ye 1, Wen-Hao Qian 1,, Yu-Bo Wu 1, Chi Yang 2
PMCID: PMC10454952  PMID: 33913399

Abstract

To evaluate the associations of impaction patterns of mandibular third molars (M3Ms) with pathologies caused by them. In this study, 262 patients with 432 impacted M3Ms who referred in Shanghai Xuhui District Center were reviewed. The pathologies include pericoronitis, mandibular second molar (M2M) caries, and M2M distal periodontal pathology. The impaction patterns of M3Ms and the pathologies were examined, while the M2M outcomes after surgeries were evaluated. A χ2 test was used to analyze the data, with a p value of <0.05 being considered statistically significant. Pericoronitis was the major symptom in all patients, whereas the propensities of M2M distal caries and periodontal pathologies increased in older patients. Soft tissue impacted and vertically angulated teeth were more associated with pericoronitis (p < 0.05); mesio-angular impacted teeth in less deep positions had greater risks of M2Ms distal caries (p < 0.05); mesio-angular and horizontal impacted teeth in relative deep positions were more likely to cause M2Ms distal periodontal pathologies (p < 0.05). Extractions of soft tissue impacted teeth in vertical angulations should be considered, while removals of mesially and horizontally angulated or bony impacted teeth could be delayed.

Keywords: Mandibular third molar, pericoronitis, caries, periodontal pathology

Introduction

Prophylactic extraction of M3M is a controversial issue. 1 M3M extraction may still present risks, the most important of which is the risk of neurological damage. 2 Therefore, some researchers found limited evidence to extract asymptomatic M3Ms3,4; while others suggested the prophylactic M3M removal should be applied conditionally,59 and sometimes the mandibular third molar may be prematurely extracted (germectomy). 10 Therefore, well defined studies are recommended to be conducted to determine the impaction patterns of M3Ms with higher risks of producing pathologies.11,12 The pathologies include: pericoronitis, mandibular second molars (M2Ms) distal caries, and M2Ms distal periodontal pathologies. However, most previous studies focused on one or two pathologies. To our knowledge, there was no a comprehensive analysis of all the pathologies. Therefore, this study was innovatively conducted to examine the association of third molar impaction pattern with prevalent and incident pericoronitis, M2M distal caries and M2M periodontal pathologies. The core concerns in the study focused as follows: (i) What are the characteristics of lower wisdom teeth that have higher risk to cause pathologies? (ii) Regarding a specific disease, which type of wisdom teeth is more likely to produce it? (iii) What is the prognosis of the second molars after the removal of wisdom teeth with pathologies?

Methods

Patients and evaluations

This was a retrospective study. This study was approved by Shanghai Xuhui District Dental Prevention and Control Institute Ethics Committee and was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2013. All participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

This retrospective study searched the patients referring to Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery department of Shanghai Xuhui District Dental Disease Prevention and Control Institute between January 2019 to January 2020 in order to identify patients that fulfilled the following inclusion criteria: (i) the mandibular third molars were fully or partially impacted; (ii) clinical data, orthopantomography were available; (iii) the surgery was performed after the examinations had been undertaken. From January 2019 to January 2020, 262 cases with 432 M3Ms were included. The patients were categorized based on their ages (age < 30, age between 30 and 50, age > 50).

Based on the clinical and Orthopantomography (OPG) examinations, all the teeth were categorized into three types: (i) soft tissue and bony impacted; (ii) position A, B, and C based on Pell & Gregory’s classification 11 ; (iii) vertical, horizontal, mesio-angular, transverse impactions of Winter. 13

The inflammatory lesions associated to mandibular third molars selected in this study were: (i) pericoronitis; (ii) M2M distal caries; (iii) M2M distal periodontal pathology. Pericoronitis was diagnosed when there was pain and swelling at the third molar area. M2M distal caries were defined when the caries (pulp disease, periapical disease) were related to contacts to M3Ms. Periodontal pathologies referred to the distal bony absorptions of the adjacent M2Ms and/or external root resorptions (ERRs) of the second molars, based on the symptoms (M2M loosened), clinical probing tests, and OPG examinations.

Outcome measurement

Outcome criteria included (i) the success rate; (ii) the mucosa healing; (iii) M2M mobility and M2M endodontic problem. The success of the surgery referred to the successful extraction of the M3M. The mucosa around the M3M area without inflammation referred to the mucosa healing well, and it was measured at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months after the surgery. For dental mobility, Miller classification was used. The M2Ms which needed to be extracted included: (i) M2Ms in degree III; (ii) M2Ms with severe root caries. Degree III refers to the tooth with bucco-lingual, mesio-distal, and vertical mobilities.

Statistics

Data was analyzed using the SAS 8.2 statistical package (SAS institute Inc, USA), χ2 test and Fisher test were used to analyze the data, with a p value of <0.05 being considered statistically significant.

Results

In total, 432 teeth in 262 patients enrolled in this study. Of these, 129 were female (216 teeth), and 133 were male (216 teeth). Their ages ranged from 18 to 63 years (average, 31 years). Of all M3Ms, 91.67% were soft tissue impacted and 8.33% bony impacted; 72.22%, 20.83%, and 6.94% were in position A, B, and C; 55.56%, 24.54%, and 19.91% were in vertical, mesio-angular, and horizontal impactions. Among all, 82.41% teeth had pericoronitis, 18.75% teeth caused M2Ms distal caries, and 14.81% teeth had M2Ms distal periodontal pathologies. There were 64 teeth had two or three pathologies. The patients in different age groups and the pathologies were summarized as shown in Table 1. The impaction patterns of the impacted M3Ms and pathologies caused by them were summarized as shown in Table 2. The inflammatory lesions associated to mandibular third molars selected were illustrated on Figure 1.

Table 1.

Patients in different age areas and their symptoms/diseases caused by M3Ms.

Age Pericoronitis Endodontic diseases Loosened M2Ms p
<30 208 34 17 p < 0.0001*
≥30, <50 139 40 40
≥50 9 7 7
*

p ≤ 0.05 is considered statistically significant.

Table 2.

Impaction patterns of mandibular 3rd molars and pathologies.

Classification Pathologies
Pericoronitis p M2M distalcaries p M2M distalperiodontalpathology p
+ + +
Impacted depth(case)
 Soft tissueimpacted 332 64 0.0097* 74 322 0.9113 55 341 0.0727
 Bonyimpacted 24 12 7 29 9 27
Pell & Gregoryclassification(case)
 A 259 53 0.7366 61 251 0.0206* 35 277 <0.0001*
 B 72 18 20 70 15 75
 C 25 5 0 30 14 16
Winter’sclassification(case)
 Vertical 219 21 <0.0001* 20 220 <0.0001* 8 232 <0.0001*
 Mesial 72 34 40 66 29 77
 Horizontal 65 21 20 66 27 59
*

p ≤ 0.05 is considered statistically significant.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

The associations of impaction patterns of mandibular third molars (M3Ms) with pathologies.

The success rate of all extractions was 100%. All the pericoronitis recovered after surgery. In the study, the five M2Ms measured in degree III of mobility and the five M2Ms with uncurable root caries were extracted after the M3Ms removals.

Discussion

In oral surgeries, whether prophylactic extractions of asymmetric M3Ms were indicated had become a hotly discussed issue. To solve this problem, the first question we need to answer is: What are the characteristics of lower wisdom teeth that have higher risk to cause pathologies? The pathologies caused by lower wisdom teeth could be categorized into soft tissue disease and hard tissue disease. Soft tissue disease mainly refers to pericoronitis, whereas hard tissue disease mainly refers to M2M distal caries. Distal periodontal pathologies of M2Ms have both soft and hard tissue defects, which further lead to the mobility of M2Ms increased and distal root absorptions. Therefore, pericoronitis, M2Ms caries and distal M2M periodontal disease were evaluated as the pathologies in this study. The “soft tissue” or ‘bony” impaction was the briefest tooth classification. In this study, 91.67% of the teeth were soft tissue impacted. It was in accordance with the understanding that the loose gap between tooth and soft tissue would be an easy approach to accumulate the bacterial biofilms.1,14 Based on Pell & Gregory’s classification, 72.22%, 20.83%, and 6.94% of the teeth were in position A, B, and C. It suggested that teeth in less deep positions were more likely to cause pathologies, which was in accordance with the other studies.1416 It might due to the teeth in high positions are closer to oral environment than those in deep positions. Based on the Winter’s classification, more than half of the M3Ms were vertically angulated, which were in accordance to the compositions of all M3Ms. The third molar in vertical position was the one with the greatest chance of presenting pericoronitis as literatures reported. 14 It might be a reason of the high rate prevalence of pericoronitis in this study.

In different age groups, the types of pathologies varied. In this study, the age of the patients ranged from 18 to 63. In this study, we found: (i) pericoronitis was the major pathology in all age groups; (ii) the frequency of carious and periodontal lesions increases with age. While similarly, there was a study showed that symptomatic M3Ms in patients over 50 were more related to M2M distal caries. 17 M2M distal caries and periodontal disease appeared in older patients indicated that these two pathologies occurred after a long period of time when M3Ms in inadequate positions and angulations.

The patients in different age groups had different concerns of pathologies, therefore, it was justified to compare M3Ms features with one specific disease. Pericoronitis is an inflammation that occurs in the soft tissues around an erupting tooth.14,16 In this study, soft tissue impacted and vertically angulated teeth were more associated with the occurrence of pericoronitis, due to the occlusal M3M faces which had grooves and fissures in contact with the pericoronary hoods. It was in accordance with the published research. 14 We also found around 70% of the mesio-angular and horizontal impacted teeth caused pericoronitis. The most convincing explanation is that, cementoenamel junction (CEJ) distance increases of M2M and M3M, which accumulates food in the interdental space. In addition, it is difficult to brush and floss due to the lack of ideal interproximal contact point, which enhances the food and bacterial accumulations. In this study, there was no difference among the teeth in position A, B, and C which had pericoronitis. In literature, there was limited evidence that pericoronitis was related to teeth positions based on the Pell & Gregory classification, whereas teeth in position A had a relative greater risk than in position B. 14 It might be interpreted due to the small number of samples in this study. Similar to our study, the data in the literature were collected in the hospital, and the patients included always had symptomatic M3Ms. 14

Impaction depth and angulation of the M3M were associated with distal caries in the M2M. 18 In this study, the frequency of M2Ms distal caries was highest in mesio-angular impacted teeth in position A, which was in accordance with the previous studies. 19 A previous study showed that, M2Ms developed more distal caries with mesial angulations from 43° to 73°. 20 Also, when the CEJ distance between the distal M2M and the mesial M3M ranged from 6 to 15 mm, distal caries in M2Ms occurred more frequently. 19 This was also related to the inappropriate contact point between two teeth which increased the difficulty of daily oral hygiene.

Periodontal pathology of the M2M is related to the impacted depth and inclination of M3M. In this study, we found deeper impacted teeth with mesial and horizontal angulations were more likely to cause adjacent periodontal pathologies. Progression of periodontal probing depth was reported in the literature,2124 but only a few studies considered the impaction patterns. There was a study suggested that the prevalence and the incidence of periodontal pathologies of M2Ms varied significantly depending on whether M3Ms were absent, erupted, soft tissue impacted, or bony impacted. 1 Second molars adjacent to soft tissue impacted third molars had significantly greater chance to cause periodontal pathologies. 1 However, the inclinations of the M3Ms were not discussed. The periodontal pathologies might lead to external root resorptions (ERRs) of the second molars.25,26 The previous studies showed ERRs of the second molars were associated with mesio-angular and horizontally impacted M3Ms.2729 In our study, we found the adjacent periodontal disease also related to this type of M3Ms, suggesting a potential relationship between periodontal pathology and ERR.

What is the prognosis of the second molars after the removal of wisdom teeth with pathologies? In this study, uncurable root caries and severe looseness of M2Ms were the worst outcomes. Among them, most of teeth were soft tissue impacted in position A&B and were mesially and horizontally angulated. The average age in those patients was 44 years old. The severe outcomes suggested the necessity of regular oral examinations every year.

This study has its limitations due to its retrospective character. The patients included in this study were those who referred to Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery department, thus almost all of them had symptoms or pathologies. When regarding to better answer whether prophylactic extraction is in necessity, a community survey with large sample or prospective study is called in the future.

Conclusions

Extractions of soft tissue impacted teeth in vertical angulations should be considered, while removals of mesially and horizontally angulated or bony impacted teeth could be delayed.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Bing Sun, Dr. Zhiyao Li, Dr. Fei Xiang, Dr. Feng Ling, Dr. Minwen Zhu, Dr. Yu Zhang, and Dr. Hongquan Li for the help of patients collection.

Author biographies

Zhou-Xi Ye is the attending doctor in the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery department of Shanghai Xuhui District Dental Disease Prevention and Control Institute. She is mainly engaged in the research of alveolar surgery.

Wen-Hao Qian is the chief physician of Shanghai Xuhui District Dental Disease Prevention and Control Institute. He is mainly engaged in general dentistry and implant surgeries.

Yu-Bo Wu is the attending doctor in the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery department of Shanghai Xuhui District Dental Disease Prevention and Control Institute. He is mainly engaged in the research of alveolar surgery and implant surgeries.

Chi Yang is the professor in Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. He is mainly engaged in maxillofacial surgery.

Footnotes

Authors’ note: There is a preprint available on ResearchSquare for the manuscript. https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-44139/v1. However, we have made several modifications of it.

Author contributions: Zhou-Xi Ye designed the study, analyzed the patient data, and was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. Wen-Hao Qian and Yu-Bo Wu reviewed and modified the manuscript. Chi Yang helped the modification of the manuscript.

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was funded by Shanghai medical key specialty (ZK2019B12).

Ethics approval: Ethical approval to report this case series was obtained from Shanghai Xuhui District Dental Prevention and Control Institute Ethics Committee

Informed consent: Written informed consent was obtained from the patient(s) for their anonymized information to be published in this article.

References

  • 1.Nunn ME, Fish MD, Garcia RI, et al. Retained asymptomatic third molars and risk for second molar pathology. J Dent Res 2013; 92: 1095–1099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cassetta M, Pranno N, Barchetti F, et al. 3.0 Tesla MRI in the early evaluation of inferior alveolar nerve neurological complications after mandibular third molar extraction: a prospective study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2014; 43: 20140152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Guidance on the extraction of wisdom teeth: technology appraisals guidance no 1, https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ta1 (accessed 27 March 2000).
  • 4.Mettes TG, Nienhuijs ME, van der Sanden WJ, et al. Interventions for treating asymptomatic impacted wisdom teeth in adolescents and adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; 2: CD003879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.American Public Health Association. Policy statement no. 20085: Opposition to prophylactic removal of third molars (wisdom teeth), https://www.apha.org/Policies-and-Advocacy/Public-Health-Policy-Statements/Policy-Database/2014/07/24/14/29/Opposition-to-Prophylactic-Removal-of-Third-Molars-Wisdom-Teeth (accessed 28 October 2008).
  • 6.Dodson TB.Wisdom tooth extraction: goals gone wild. Dent Abstr 2010; 55: 4–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Friedman JW.The prophylactic extraction of third molars: a public health hazard. Am J Public Health 2007; 97: 1554–1559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Friedman JW, Presson SM.Wisdom tooth extraction in perspective. Dent Abstr 2010; 55: 228–229. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Elter JR, Offenbacher S, White RP, et al. Third molars associated with periodontal pathology in older Americans. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005; 63: 179–184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cassetta M, Altieri F.The influence of mandibular third molar germectomy on the treatment time of impacted mandibular second molars using brass wire: a prospective clinical pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017; 46: 905–911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.White RPJ. Progress report on third molar clinical trials. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 65: 377–383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Dodson TB, Rafetto LK, Nelson WJ.Introduction to proceedings of the third molar multidisciplinary conference Washington, DC. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 70: S2–S3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zhang ZY, Yu GY. The textbook of Oral and maxillofacial surgery (in Chinese). 7th ed.Peking: People’s Medical Publishing House (PMPH), 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Galvão EL, da Silveira EM, de Oliveira ES, et al. Association between mandibular third molar position and the occurrence of pericoronitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Oral Biol 2019; 107: 104486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pepper T, Konarzewski T, Grimshaw P, et al. Treatment of mandibular third molars and pericoronitis in British military personnel: influence of guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016; 54: 1111–1115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Elter JR, Cuomo CH, Offenbacher S, et al. Third molars associated with periodontal pathology in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004; 62: 440–445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Anyanechi CE, Saheeb BD, Okechi UC.Is prophylactic removal of impacted mandibular third molar justified in all patients? A prospective clinical study of patients 50 years and above. Afr Health Sci 2019; 19: 1789–1794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Marques J, Montserrat-Bosch M, Figueiredo R, et al. Impacted lower third molars and distal caries in the mandibular second molar. Is prophylactic removal of lower third molars justified? J Clin Exp Dent 2017; 9: e794–e798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.McArdle LW, McDonald F, Jones J.Distal cervical caries in the mandibular second molar: an indication for the prophylactic removal of third molar teeth? Update. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014; 52: 185–189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kang F, Huang C, Sah MK, et al. Effect of eruption status of the mandibular third molar on distal caries in the adjacent second molar. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016; 74: 684–692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Blakey GH, Jacks MT, Offenbacher S, et al. Progression of periodontal disease in the second/third molar region in subjects with asymptomatic third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 64: 189–193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Blakey GH, Hull DJ, Haug RH, et al. Changes in third molar and nonthird molar periodontal pathology over time. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 65: 1577–1583 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Blakey GH, Golden BA, White RP, Jr, et al. Changes in third molar and nonthird molar periodontal pathology over time. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 65: 1577–1583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Garaas RN, Fisher EL, Wilson GH, et al. Prevalence of third molars with caries experience or periodontal pathology in young adults. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 70: 507–513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Fuss Z, Tsesis I, Lin S.Root resorption-diagnosis, classification and treatment choices based on stimulation factors. Dent Traumatol 2003; 19: 175–182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Nakata K, Naitoh M, Izumi M, et al. Evaluation of correspondence of dental computed tomography imaging to anatomic observation of external root resorption. J Endod 2009; 35: 1594–1597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wang D, He X, Wang Y, et al. External root resorption of the second molar associated with mesially and horizontally impacted mandibular third molar: evidence from cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Investig 2017; 21: 1335–1342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Oenning AC, Neves FS, Alencar PN, et al. External root resorption of the second molar associated with third molar impaction: comparison of panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014; 72: 1444–1455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Oenning AC, Melo SL, Groppo FC, et al. Mesial inclination of impacted third molars and its propensity to stimulate external root resorption in second molars—a cone-beam computed tomographic evaluation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015; 73: 379–386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Science Progress are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES